The document provides an agenda for a training academy hosted by Distribution Technology Ltd. on their Dynamic Planner software. The agenda includes sessions on Dynamic Planner client success features like case studies, fund risk profiling, and the client review process. There will also be presentations from partner firms on topics like global economic updates. The event will take place in Newcastle and include breakfast, sessions, refreshments and networking opportunities.
75. This document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the person to whom it is given or sent and may not be reproduced,
copied or given, in whole or in part, to any other person.
GAMManaged FundSolutions
Dynamic Planner Training Academy
October 2019
Marketing material for professional investors only.
Tony Morton
Client Manager
76. 7 investment centres in Europe, the US and Asia
Source: GAM.
Data as at 30 Jun 2019, excluding GBP 0.81 billion ARBF-related AuM in liquidation. 1. The assets under management breakdown applies to GBP 42.0bn assets managed
within the Group’s investment management area; it excludes assets of GBP 67.7bn in the Group’s private labelling business.
Distinctive product offering combined with significant global presence and reach
Group overview
Overview
Independent asset management group focused on active investing
GBP 109.7bn in assets under management, of which
Investment management business is GBP 42.0bn
Private label business is GBP 67.7bn
SIX Swiss Exchange listed company
Distinctive offering covering the full spectrum of asset classes and
strategies
AUM1 by product type
AUM1 by client type
AUM of GBP 42.0bn in the Group’s investment management business
46%
47%
7%
Intermediaries
Institutional clients
Private clients
52%
13%
15%
9%
8%
3%
Fixed Income
Multi Asset
Equity
Systematic
Alternatives
Absolute Return
863 employees in offices in 14 countries
New YorkLondon Zurich LuganoHong Kong MilanCambridge
78. Understanding our Emotions
Source: GAM
The views are those of the manager and are subject to change.
2007
Runners up
2011
Lose in
quarter finals
2015
Knocked out in
group stages
Emotionalsensitivity
HighHighLow
2003
Winning the
world cup
2015
Eddie Jones
appointed
Head coach
2019
Winning the Japan world cup???
2016
6 Nations Grand Slam and
whitewash Australia
Would you continue to support…?
79. 79
Investing is also emotional
Source: GAM
The views are those of the manager and are subject to change.
Maximum
financial
opportunity
Maximum
financial
risk
Emotionalsensitivity
HighHighLow
Euphoria
Capitulation
Euphoria
Depression
Hope
Optimism
Excitement
ThrillAnxiety
Denial
Fear
Desperation
Panic
Would you stay invested… ?
80. Chart comparing flows to equity funds related to a 12 month S&P 500 Index return
80
Emotional investing in practice…
Source: blog.wealthfront.com, “Investors’ Most Serious Mistake” – 28 Feb 2013
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
For illustrative purposes only
81. 81
Timing the market is difficult
Source: Prepared by J.P Morgan Asset Management using data from Lipper. 20-year annualized returns are based on the S&P 500 Total Returns Index, an unmanaged,
capitalization-weighted index that measures the performance of 500 large capitalization domestic stocks representing all major industries. Past performance is not indicative
of future returns. An individual cannot invest directly in an index. Data as at30 Jun 2016.
This chart is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any investment or group of investments. Past
performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
$65,453
(9.85% return)
$32,665
(6.10% return)
$20,354
(3.62% return)
$13,446
(1.49% return)
$9,140
(-0.45% return) $6,392
(-2.21% return) $4,570
(-3.84% return)
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
Fully Invested Missed 10 best
days
Missed 20 Best
days
Missed 30 best
days
Missed 40 best
days
Missed 50 best
days
Missed 60 best
days
Did you know six of the 10 best days occurred within
two weeks of the 10 worst days?
Performance of a $10,000 investment between 3 Jan 1995 and 31 Dec 2014
Returns of the S&P 500 For illustrative purposes only
83. Source: Financial Express analytics. Assumes: nil Initial Charge and no switching charge.
The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment
advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
Starting with a GBP 1,000 investing in arrears in the top performing fund over 12 months
Fund picking: The benefits of hindsight…
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
84. 84Source: Financial Express analytics. Assumes: nil Initial Charge and no switching charge.
The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment
advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
Starting with a GBP 1,000 investing in last year’s top performing fund
… and now the reality!
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
85. Every asset class has its day
The need for a professionally managed, multi-asset solution
Source: RIMES, MSCI, Bloomberg, as at 31 Dec 2018.
Indices represented by: Lipper Global Mixed Asset GBP Balanced (GAM Hedged) in USD, HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index in USD, MSCI World Index in USD, MSCI Emerging Markets Index in USD, Barclays Global Agg
Credit Total Return Index Hedged in USD, FTSE (WGBI) World Govt. Bond Index in USD, Barclays Macro: Global High Yield Bond Index in USD, Average USD 1 Month Deposit Rate. The mentioned financial instruments
are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. Funds do not have the security of capital
that is characteristic of a bank deposit.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Simple performance returns
For illustrative purposes only.
Highest
return
(%)
Lowest
return
(%)
85
86. Every asset class has its day
The need for a professionally managed, multi-asset solution
Source: RIMES, MSCI, Bloomberg, as at 30 Jun 2019.
Indices represented by: Lipper Global Mixed Asset GBP Balanced (GAM Hedged) in USD, HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index in USD, MSCI World Index in USD, MSCI Emerging Markets Index in USD, Barclays Global Agg
Credit Total Return Index Hedged in USD, FTSE (WGBI) World Govt. Bond Index in USD, Barclays Macro: Global High Yield Bond Index in USD, Average USD 1 Month Deposit Rate. The mentioned financial instruments
are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges. Funds do not have the security of capital that is characteristic of a bank deposit.
Highest
return
(%)
Lowest
return
(%)
Simple performance returns
For illustrative purposes only.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
6.1%
0.8%
10.6%
2.8%
0.8%
1.2%
5.1%
3.9%
2013-2019 H1
(ann.)
6.8%
86
88. Source: GAM
The views are those of the manager and are subject to change.
Three key benefits
Investing in an actively managed multi asset fund
Avoid the pitfalls of
emotional investing
Avoid the issues
of fund picking
Benefit from a one-stop,
fully diversified portfolio
The nature of “buy low, sell high” is often
overlooked when personally investing
Individuals frequently sell out of loss-
making positions for the fear of greater
losses, or buy into over-priced assets due
to excitement over expected superior
returns
Active asset managers invest solely for
the benefit of their clients, and only make
investments based on rigorous analysis
and due diligence, as well as with
complete conviction and sound economic
reasoning
It can often be very easy to invest in funds
that have had a recent spell of excellent
performance, or funds that gained a great
deal of popularity
Very rarely can fund managers sustain
long periods of superior performance, and
often spells of strong performance are
followed by periods of below-par
performance
Active multi manager funds seek to invest
in funds that can demonstrate consistent
long-term performance above their
benchmark
A wealth of research and evidence exists
to support the benefits of a fully diversified
portfolio, but this can be difficult to
achieve in practice
Many decisions such as the right asset
class mix, how much attention is paid to
changing economic environments,
accessibility of funds, transaction costs
and more need to be considered
Active multi asset, multi manager funds
combine all of the benefits of
diversification while removing the
responsibility of individual decision-
making
89. 89Source: GAM
The views expressed are those of the manager and are subject to change.
The benefits for you and your clients
Why consider GAM Managed Fund Solutions?
GAM Managed Fund Solutions offers investors: Benefits for intermediaries:
Choice
Five multi-asset, risk-targeted funds
designed to suit a range of different client
needs
Flexibility
Each portfolio invests in actively managed
funds with a change in emphasis between
capital preservation and capital growth
Expertise
The funds combine GAM’s expertise in
manager research, asset allocation and
active investment management
Freedom
These core, outsourced investment
solutions can help to save time and create
efficiencies within your business
Simplicity
Help to reduce the burden of investment
selection and portfolio management and
ensure the portfolio is appropriate for each
client
Control
With GAM’s investment specialists
navigating financial markets on your behalf
you have more time to concentrate on your
all important client relationships
91. Source: GAM.
For illustrative purposes only.There is no guarantee that targets will be achieved. The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be
considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
An overview of the fund range
92. Performance from 21 Nov 2012 to 30 Aug 2019
Source: GAM
¹Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Dynamic Growth. ²Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Growth. ³Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star
Balanced.4Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Cautious. 5Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Defensive.
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
12.6 – 14.7
8.4 – 10.5
6.3 – 8.4
4.2 – 6.3
Vol Target
10.5 – 12.6
¹
²
³
4
5
Performance of GAM Managed Fund Solutions
(Since inception of GAM Star Global Defensive – GBP Institutional)
93. Performance from 1 Jul 2013 to 30 Aug 2019
Source: GAM
¹Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Dynamic Growth. ²Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Growth. ³Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star
Balanced.4Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Cautious. 5Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Defensive.
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
93
12.6 – 14.7
8.4 – 10.5
6.3 – 8.4
4.2 – 6.3
Vol Target
10.5 – 12.6
¹
²
³
4
5
Performance of GAM Managed Fund Solutions
(Since inception of GAM Star Global Cautious – Z GBP)
94. Performance of GAM Managed Fund Solutions – (YTD)
Performance from 31 Dec 2018 to 30 Aug 2019
Source: GAM
¹Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Dynamic Growth. ²Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Growth. ³Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star
Balanced.4Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Cautious. 5Full legal name: GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Defensive.
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
94
96. UK equities vs the Rest of the World
Performance from 2 Sep 2009 to 2 Sep 2019
Source: RIMES, MSCI
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
97. UK equities vs the Rest of the World
Annualised performance from 2 Sep 2009 to 2 Sep 2019
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
Source: RIMES, MSCI
98. 98Source: GAM
vs Dynamic Planner
Asset Allocation
Dynamic Planner UK DT 5 GAM MFS Star Balanced % Difference
Cash (Money Markets) 5% 9% +4%
UK Gilts 3% 0% -3%
UK Index Linked Gilts 4% 0% -4%
Sterling Corporate Bonds 19% 6% -13%
Global Inv Grade Bonds 4% 24% +20%
UK Equity 23% 8% -15%
Europe Ex UK Equity 5% 9% +4%
North American Equity 16% 12% -4%
Japanese Equity 6% 9% +3%
Asia Pacific Ex Japan Equity 5% 5% -
Emerging Markets Equity 5% 7% +2%
Property 5% 3% -2%
Commodities 0% 4% +4%
Absolute Return 0% 5% +5%
100% 100%
99. 99Source: IA
The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment
advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
GAM MFS global positioning verses competitor funds
Fund UK Equity Global Equity Total Equity
GAM Star Global Balanced 8.1% 52.0% 60.1%
Quilter Cirilian Moderate 15.0% 47.7% 62.7%
L&G Multi-Index 5 12.6% 42.3% 54.9%
Rathbone Multi Asset Strategic Growth 16.3% 45.9% 62.2%
SVS Cornelian Managed Growth 16.2% 30.0% 46.2%
SLI MyFolio Managed IV 22.8% 33.6% 56.4%
BMO MM Lifestyle 5 21.7% 36.5% 58.2%
Premier Liberation V 27.0% 29.0% 56.0%
Santander Atlas Portfolio 5 16.5% 41.9% 58.4%
Average 17.4% 40.0% 57.2%
100. GAM Star Global Balanced
Asset Allocation analysis history - Equity from 31 Oct 2012 to 31 Aug 2019
Source: GAM
101. GAM Global Growth v IA Flexible in 2013: +8%
Performance from 1 Jan 2013 to 31 Dec 2013
Source: MSCI, RIMES, Thomson Reuters
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. Performance is shown net of management
fees of the underlying funds held but gross of management fee at the portfolio level.
102. GAM Global Growth v IA Flexible in 2015: +1.9%
Performance from 1 Jan 2015 to 31 Dec 2015
Source: MSCI, RIMES, Thomson Reuters
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. Performance is shown net of management
fees of the underlying funds held but gross of management fee at the portfolio level.
103. GAM Global Growth v IA Flexible in 2017: +3.7%
Performance from 2 Jan 2017 to 29 Dec 2017
Source: MSCI, RIMES, Thomson Reuters
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. Performance is shown net of management
fees of the underlying funds held but gross of management fee at the portfolio level.
104. GAM Global Growth v IA Flexible in 2019: +3%
Performance from 31 Dec 2018 to 6 Sep 2019
Source: MSCI, RIMES, Thomson Reuters
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. Performance is shown net of management
fees of the underlying funds held but gross of management fee at the portfolio level.
106. Source: GAM
The views expressed are those of the manager and are subject to change.
Learning objectives
Summary
Awareness
Investors can be their own
worst enemy, particularly
when fund picking and trying
to time the market
Risk Profiled
GAM MFS is aligned to
Dynamic planner Risk Profiles
3 to 7
Diversification
Benefits of Diversification
Global
Be disciplined with
Diversification by thinking
global
137. This document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the person to whom it is given or sent and may not be reproduced,
copied or given, in whole or in part, to any other person.
GAMManaged FundSolutions
Dynamic Planner Training Academy
October 2019
Marketing material for professional investors only.
Tony Morton
Client Manager
139. Scenario 1: Fed continues to drain liquidity and China refuses to jump start the world economy – oil trades in a tight range. The US deficit
crowds out money from private sector and ECB ends quant easing. Overpriced assets of early 2018 (tech) continue to deflate but value
starts to meaningfully outperform
Scenario 2: Oil stumbles. Global growth continues to slow. Fed intercedes and becomes more dovish putting rate rises on hold – dollar
supremacy starts to fall. Asia gets the holy trifecta of easier Fed, falling oil and weaker dollar – EM and Asia enter bull market
Scenario 3: Fed does a U-turn and re-injects liquidity into the system. Unlikely until we see some systemic blow-up eg Italian recession,
banking system collapse, China hard landing and/or China banking system, US corporate bond market collapse
Scenario 4: China rides to the rescue as they did in 2012 and 2015. Their focus is on domestic protection rather than saving the RoW. A
massive stimulus would likely cause more currency related weakness which would exacerbate any export slowdown already underway - so a
moderated stimulus only this time round
On balance we do not see a recession (either a US or a global one) in 2019 – market price adjustments in Q4 2018 had gone too far and
were too quick. A slowdown was clearly starting to take effect at the start of 2018
Central bank action has inevitably become more supportive again and the narrative needs to walk a fine line avoiding a panic and to help lift
sentiment again
Resolutions to the current trade war will provide an immediate relief rally - both sides are firmly entrenched but Trump must realise he wont
see any economic benefits from this approach under his watch. China seems more than happy to ‘wait’ him out
2019 – what we thought at the start of the year
141. China credit management global swing factor now
1 year rolling returns from 31 Jul 2006 to 31 Jul 2019
Source: MSCI, Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
142. Policy uncertainty still elevated
From 31 Mar 1997 to 31 Jul 2019
Source: Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
143. Oil Price sets the expected inflation rate
From 14 Jul 2009 to 1 Aug 2019
Source: Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
144. The central bank punchbowl
1 year rolling returns from 31 May 2010 to 31 Jul 2019
Source: Bloomberg, MSCI
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
YoY decline of $787bn in central bank assets. Returns generally directed by central bank flow
145. Bond markets are telling you something
From 30 Sep 1992 to 31 Aug 2019
Source: Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
Overly restrictive monetary policy de-stablises growth. Recession risks may not be immediate, but the direction of trend points to a slowdown. including the potential
for an inversion of the yield curve.
146. Financial Conditions - sub indices
From 31 Mar 1971 to 23 Aug 2019
Source: Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
The risk sub-index captures volatility and funding risk in the financial sector;
The credit sub-index is composed of measures of credit conditions
The leverage sub-index consists of debt and equity measures.
Increasing risk, tighter credit conditions and declining leverage are consistent with increases in the NFCI. Always precede a recession when some or all go positive.
Tighter financial conditions
Looser financial conditions
147. US CAPE
From 1 Jan 1910 to 31 Aug 2019
Source: Shiller
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
• Shiller PE looks at inflation adjusted average earnings over 10 years. A level over 25 has been surpassed only four times historically – 1929, 1999 and 2007 and now.
• Major market drops followed those peaks
Overvaluation Zone
Fair value Zone
Undervaluation Zone
148. If equities look expensive, justify bond prices!
From 1 Jan 1963 to 31 Aug 2019
Source: Shiller, Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
• Another way to compare it on a relative basis is to look at 10 year risk free
• Each time InvCAPE crosses to the upside = strong buy. Each time InvCAPE crosses to the downside = sell
• Basically saying the earnings yield on stocks is now worse than on risk free
• Investors buy equities now for yield/income
characteristics
• And buy bonds (on negative yields) for capital
appreciation!
149. The recession indicators to watch
From 31 Mar 1970 to 31 Jul 2019
Source: Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
US LEI: 1)Avg weekly hours (manufacturing) 2)Avg weekly unemployment claims 3) Manufacturers new orders, consumer goods and materials 4)Manufacturers new orders, non-defence capital goods
excl aircraft 5)ISM New orders 6) Building permits 7)S&P 500 Index 8)Leading Credit Index 9)Int rate spread 10 yr to Fed funds 10)Avg consumer expectations for business conditions
151. The UK economy may already be in recession
From 31 Mar 1971 to 30 Jun 2019
Source: Bloomberg
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
UK LEI: 1)Order book volume (CBI) 2)Vol Expected Output (CBI) 3)Consumer Confidence (EC) 4)FTSE ALL Share 5)Yield spread (BoE) 6) Productivity, whole economy (ONS) 7)Total Gross Operating
Surplus (ONS)
The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment advice.
Allocations and holdings are subject to change.
153. Source: GAM
The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment
advice. Allocations and holdings are subject to change. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Asset allocation analysis as at 5 Sep 2019
GAM Star Global Balanced
60.1%
23.0%
6.4%
4.6%
6.0%
Equity Fixed Income
Alternatives Absolute Return
Net current assets
155. Equity carve-out
Performance from 30 Dec 2016 to 30 Aug 2019
Source: Lipper
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
77% of managers outperformed
60% of managers outperforming
18% of managers outperformed
GAM Star Balanced – Equity Long ( Level 1) is a performance series based on the Equity portion of the GAM Star Balanced Fund. It is not in itself a fund or strategy that can be
accessed separately and so its performance must always be viewed in the context of the wider GAM Star Balanced Fund (GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Balanced).
156. Fixed Income carve-out
Performance from 30 Dec 2016 to 30 Aug 2019
Source: RIMES
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
67% of managers outperformed 20% of managers outperformed
0% of managers outperforming
GAM Star Balanced – Fixed Income Long ( Level 1) is a performance series based on the Fixed Income portion of the GAM Star Balanced Fund. It is not in itself a fund or strategy
that can be accessed separately and so its performance must always be viewed in the context of the wider GAM Star Balanced Fund (GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Balanced).
157. Alternative carve-out
Performance from 30 Dec 2016 to 29 Aug 2019
Source: GAM
Statistics herein based on currency hedged indices, identified by ‘(GAM hedged)’ in their title, have been calculated by GAM with the aim of valid comparison to our currency hedged products. Details of their
calculation are available on request. GAM Star Balanced – Alternative Investments ( Level 1) is a performance series based on the Alternative portion of the GAM Star Balanced Fund. It is not in itself a fund
or strategy that can be accessed separately and so its performance must always be viewed in the context of the wider GAM Star Balanced Fund (GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Balanced).
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
50% of managers outperformed 100% of managers outperformed
50% of managers outperforming
158. Absolute Return carve-out
Performance from 30 Dec 2016 to 29 Aug 2019
Source: GAM
Statistics herein based on currency hedged indices, identified by ‘(GAM hedged)’ in their title, have been calculated by GAM with the aim of valid comparison to our currency hedged products. Details of their
calculation are available on request. GAM Star Balanced – Absolute Return Long ( Level 1) is a performance series based on the Absolute return portion of the GAM Star Balanced Fund. It is not in itself a
fund or strategy that can be accessed separately and so its performance must always be viewed in the context of the wider GAM Star Balanced Fund (GAM Star Fund plc. - GAM Star Balanced).
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. The performance is net of commissions,
fees and other charges.
33% of managers outperformed 50% of managers outperformed
100% of managers outperforming
160. Source: GaveKal
The passive trap - Last decades winners rarely keep winning
Top 10 stocks by decade – winners rarely remain at the top
161. Dont believe the hype
Source: RIMES, MSCI
Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.
162. 162
Capital at risk – All financial investments involve an element of risk. Therefore, the value of the investment and the income from it will vary
and the initial investment amount cannot be guaranteed.
Counterparty risk / derivatives – If a counterparty to a financial derivative contract were to default, the value of the contract, the cost to
replace it and any cash or securities held by the counterparty to facilitate it, may be lost.
Leverage Risk – Derivatives may multiply the exposure to underlying assets and expose the Fund to the risk of substantial losses.
Credit risk / debt securities – Bonds may be subject to significant fluctuations in value. Bonds are subject to credit risk and interest rate risk.
Credit risk / non-investment grade – Non-investment grade securities, which will generally pay higher yields than more highly rated securities,
will be subject to greater market and credit risk, affecting the performance of the Fund.
Credit risk / structured products – Should the counterparty to a structured note default, the value of those structured notes may be nil.
Interest Rate Risk – A rise or fall in interest rates causes fluctuations in the value of fixed income securities, which may result in a decline or
an increase in the value of such investments.
Currency Risk – The value of investments in assets that are denominated in currencies other than the base currency will be affected by
changes in the relevant exchange rates which may cause a decline.
Fund risks
Source: GAM
163. 163
Currency Risk [non base currency share class] – Non-base currency share classes may or may not be hedged to the base currency of the
Fund. Changes in exchange rates will have an impact on the value of shares in the Fund which are not denominated in the base currency.
Where hedging strategies are employed, they may not be fully effective.
Market Risk / Emerging Markets – Emerging markets will generally be subject to greater political, market, counterparty and operational risks.
Equity – Investments in equities (directly or indirectly via derivatives) may be subject to significant fluctuations in value.
Operational risk / third parties – Investments in other funds have direct and indirect dependence on other service providers. The Fund may
suffer disruption or loss in the event of their failure.
Liquidity Risk (Fund of Funds) – Investments in other funds are subject to the liquidity of those underlying funds. If underlying funds suspend
or defer payment of redemption proceeds, the Fund's ability to meet redemption requests may also be affected.
Brexit Risk – The regulatory regime to which certain of the Investment Managers are subject to in the UK could be materially and adversely
affected. The decision to leave the EU could also result in substantial volatility in foreign exchange markets and a sustained period of
uncertainty for the UK, the EU and the global markets in general.
Fund risks
Source: GAM
164. 164
Important legal information
Source: GAM, unless otherwise stated. (Where applicable and, unless otherwise noted, performance is shown net of fees, on a NAV to NAV basis). GAM has not independently verified the information from
other sources and GAM gives no assurance, expressed or implied, as to whether such information is accurate, true or complete.
This material is confidential and intended solely for the use of the person, persons or entities with nationality of or respectively with their residence, domicile or registered office in a State or Country in which
such distribution, publication, making available or use is not contrary to laws or other regulations, and may not be reproduced, copied or given, in whole or in part, to any other person. It is aimed at
sophisticated, professional, eligible, institutional and/or qualified investors/ intermediaries appointed by GAM who have the knowledge and financial sophistication to understand and bear the
risks associated with the investments described.
Nothing contained herein constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice, nor is it to be solely relied on in making an investment or other decision. This document qualifies as marketing material.
The views expressed herein are those of the manager at the time and are subject to change. The price of shares may go down as well as up and the price will depend on fluctuations in financial
markets outside GAM's control. As a result an investor may not get back the amount invested. Past performance is not indicative of future performance and reference to a security is not a
recommendation to buy or sell that security.
This is not an invitation to invest in any GAM product or strategy. Investments should only be made after a thorough reading of the current prospectus, offering memorandum, the Key Investor Information
Document “KIID”, the articles of association and the current annual and semi-annual reports (the “legal documents”), as well as after consulting an independent finance and tax specialist. The legal
documents can be obtained in hard copy and free of charge from the addresses indicated below.
Some of the sub-funds may not be registered for sale in all jurisdictions. Therefore, no active marketing must be carried out for them. Subscriptions will only be received and shares or units issued on the
basis of the current fund prospectus.
Shares of the fund have not been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the fund is not registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the “Company Act”). Accordingly, such shares may not be offered, sold or distributed in the United States or to US persons unless an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and the
Company Act is available. In addition, certain GAM products are closed to all US investors.
This material/presentation mentions one or several sub-funds of GAM Star Fund p.l.c., registered office at George’s Court, 54-62 Townsend Street, Dublin 2, Ireland, an umbrella investment company with
variable capital and segregated liability between the sub-funds, incorporated under the laws of Ireland and authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) as a UCITS Fund in accordance with the Directive
2009/65/EC. Management Company is GAM Fund Management Limited, George’sCourt, 54-62 Townsend Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
UK: As far as UCITS described herein are recognised schemes under section 264 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: Copies of the legal documents can be obtained in English, free of charge,
from the Facilities Agent GAM Sterling Management Limited, 8 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7GB (authorised and regulated by the FCA) or on the internet at www.gam.com. Investments in the funds are
not protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
Within the UK, this material has been issued and approved by GAM London Ltd, 8 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7GB, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Disclaimer
Reference this is discussion the functionality of a full Dynamic Planner licence. Reference network/service provider may see things differently.
CLO on Student loans issued by the UK Gov
Elements is available at no extra cost to all licence holders who have a full Dynamic Planner licence. Depending on you access via a service or network provider you may not be able to access this functionality?
Thank you to all attending and Dynamic Planner for inviting GAM to be a partner for this training academy
Over the next 30 mins or so we are going to discuss :
How investors can be their own worst enemy
The benefits of disciplined diversification
Advantages of thinking globally about investment
At GAM Investments, we live & breath investing but we understand that often it might not be as fascinating to everybody else.
That said, it is a vital part of the overall financial picture & warrants explanation & discussion.
It is sometimes difficult to demonstrate the relevance of investment management so we find ourselves looking for analogies.
During a fantastic period of sport & with the rugby world cup just around the corner, we thought it would be a sensible place to start to demonstrate the element & importance of emotion in investing.
Reference to something we are familiar with, such as sport, will hopefully help.
I am here today with my colleague Sean Cooney. We had a discussion about who should do this part of the presentation given the nod to rugby.
Sean is South African, his father is part Welsh, his parents now live in Ireland & his son is English; all sorts of conflicts & issues!
So you have me presenting for a few minutes.
Apologies to those of you who are not English
Left axis shows how we react to the highs & lows of supporting our national rugby team; we have called it “emotional sensitivity”
England won the RWC in 2003, & we were euphoric.
Decent string of performances in 2007 saw us achieve the runners up spot & then we lost in the quarter finals in 2011; English rugby fans were still relative happy with their team.
In 2015, we were knocked out in the group stages. It was painful, humiliating etc but……did we still support the team? Would you continue to support? Of course you would.
Why? There are no financial implications. Maybe tickets, travel & a few pints but you aren’t going to lose your house over it.
And then of course, Eddie Jones has done an excellent job since being appointed. We had a great year in 2016 & have a decent chance at the World Cup this & next month.
Same thought process can be applied to investing.
Same “emotional sensitivity” scale.
When we are in a bull market, investors tend to be euphoric & as markets start to fall, humans go through a range of emotions such as anxiety, denial, fear, desperation, panic to the point of capitulation.
It is usually at this point, when things can’t get any worse, that many investors redeem out of markets. You will have heard others talk about this being the worst possible time to get out of markets; the maximum financial opportunity.
And then as markets recover, we can go through more positive emotional phases to, at some point again reaching a euphoria.
Importantly, this euphoric stage tends to represent the maximum financial risk; we are caught up in the excitement of the momentum of risk assets that have become expensive.
Same question applies; would you continue to support markets - & stay invested - at that point of capitulation? For instance, in 2008 when equity markets were down somewhere between 40 & 70%.
Looking at this in practise; what evidence do we have that shows how investors have behaved?
Slide shows the performance of the S&P 500 (grey line) against flows in to equity mutual funds (blue shaded area) between 1993 & 2013.
When the technology bubble was reaching its peak in March 2000, US equity mutual funds had USD350bn of net inflows that month.
When markets were reaching the very bottom of their trough in September 2008, US equity funds saw USD320bn of net outflows that month.
Think back to the previous slides; this chart proves that theory.
Another important point is that net inflows didn’t really pick up following the market falls in 2008 when the recovery in risk assets was so strong.
Clichéd as it is, investors really can be their own worst enemy.
I am sure you have all been told (probably by an investment manager) that timing the market is difficult. It is & here are some numbers to prove it.
We are looking at returns from the S&P 500 over the last 20 years. If you had invested USD10,000 at the start of the period & held it from 1995 until 2014, your investment would have grown to USD65,453 having made 9.85% per annum.
But if you hadn’t held it for the whole period & missed the best 10 days, for instance, your investment at the end of the period would be about half as much; USD32,665 having generated 6.1% over the period.
The point holds true if your investment had missed out on the best 20 / 30 days of performance from the index. Notably, if the investment missed out on the best 40 / 50 / 60 days, the result is a negative return over the whole period.
Also, the dynamics of the equity market are such that six of the best days of performance from the index came within two weeks of the 10 worst days.
Summary – timing the market is difficult to nigh-on impossible. Time in the market is much more important.
Second important point to understand is the challenge, or perhaps more dramatically the dangers, of fund picking.
Consider that you invest £1,000 at the start of each calendar year & using your crystal ball that identifies the best performing fund in the Investment Association universe for the next 12 months.
Between 1998 & 2015, you could have turned £1,000 into £54m.
Clearly, there are flaws here (not least the idea of a crystal ball) but bear with me because it helps illustrate the reality.
Now consider that you invest £1,000 at the beginning of each calendar year in last year’s best performing fund over the same period, from 1998 to 2015. This is investing simply based on past performance.
This exercise turns £1,000 in to £1,010.
Again, there are flaws but the point is clear; picking funds to generate consistently positive returns is not easy.
So, we have shown that emotion can cloud investor decision-making, timing the market is somewhere between difficult & impossible & fund picking is tough but it is vital to mitigate the chance of a poor decision.
The last point to cover in this section of our presentation is what we call “disciplined diversification”.
You will likely have seen a chart like this before; it shows the performance of a spread of asset class indices between 2013 & 2018.
It is clear that different asset classes generate a variety of different return numbers each year. Optically, global equities (green) or global hedge funds (red) are perhaps the most consistent performers.
If we put some numbers to this, we can see that EM equities have been the best performing of these asset classes over the period, albeit with a pretty volatile return profile that would likely mean an investor would not have held his / her nerve over the period.
Interestingly, global government bonds (turquoise) have had a torrid time with calendar year performance ranging from -14 to +38%; end result = 2.8% annualised for the six year period.
Notably, the Lipper Balanced Mult-Asset index, that includes various strategies following a diversified approach to investing across asset classes, generated 6.1% with a fairly consistent return profile.
The blue ovals each year show the performance of the GAM Star Global Balanced fund that generated 6.8% net over the six year period, including a disappointing 2018.
Rather than trying to pick each asset class each year, one option is to invest your clients in a strategy that is managed to move between asset classes in a disciplined manner, aiming to mitigate negative surprises & generate a consistent return over the investment cycle.
This is really what active asset allocation & active fund selection is about.
Preaching to the converted here….if your make use of Dynamic Planner you are already award of this but as a reminder there are 3 key benefits
Avoid the pitfalls of market-timing and focus on ‘time in’ the market
Avoid issues of fund picking by diversifying
Reduce risk and complexity by accessing a one-stop diversified portfolio (no VAT, CGT wrapped within the fund structure, transparent on fees)
Focus on 3….
Offer investors:
Choice: 5 multi-asset, risk targeted multi manager funds mapped to Dynamic Planner 3 – 7 risk profiles
Expertise: GAM has a long history in managing multi-asset portfolios. Given our history we have run a considerable amount of private client assets for the likes of UBS and Julius Baer in multi-asset portfolios.
Charlie joined from Quilter Cheviot where he was responsible for running their MPS since 2001
Manager research capability has been established for over 25 years. Their focus is talent and are not drawn to brand names
~350 managers interviewed and reviewed annually
Benefits for intermediaries:
Simplicity – Unitised structure available widely across UK platforms, no VAT, CGT Wrapped within fund, transparent on all fees & transaction costs.
Control – business risk reduced while allowing you to focus more on clients
We’ve recently done a soft re-launch of this offering by including the word ‘Global’ in the name of each fund. this may not sound significant but I’ll come back to this in a minute
The other NB change is that we have capped the OCF at 1.15%
10 years, proof of why global thinking has its advantages.
Annualised of 13.8% vs. 8.8% with almost equal volatility
Doesn’t matter how you cut it
No just a Brexit story
UW – UK Fixed Income & UK Equity
On average almost 1/3rd of equity sleeve is allocated to UK Equity
Disciplined diversification is the key point here. Equity allocation notably geographically diverse
You can see its not only recently that we’ve had a lower allocation to UK equity.
The following slides have a look at this idea of being ‘more globally diverse’ in the context of a multi asset solution
We’ve compared ourselves with IA 40 to 80 and IA Flexible to be transparent and expose ourselves
Thank you to all attending and Dynamic Planner for inviting GAM to be a partner for this training academy
Over the next 30 mins or so we are going to discuss :
How investors can be their own worst enemy
The benefits of disciplined diversification
Advantages of thinking globally about investment
Had four scenarios at start of year. Fact that we had four demonstrates how tough it was (& still is) to call the macro & market environment.
Scenarios 1 & 3, that focused on there being more dramatic negative events that would cause hard landings in the larger economies & risk assets suffered, haven’t happened.
Scenarios 2 & 4, that focused on global growth slowing & central banks being accommodative, seem to be what has happened this year.
Outcome
No recession but signs of slowdown ie no reason to panic
Central bank action remaining very much in focus
US-China trade war on-going with Trump continuing to be Trump but it is clear that China can wait it out.
Must not underestimate China’s capacity to influence global markets.
Chart shows that if Chinese authorities decide to support the domestic economy (grey line), it has an impact on global markets (blue line).
Grey line shows how Chinese authorities either increase or decrease the availability of credit.
Blue line shows the performance of global equities.
When the grey line goes down, the Chinese authorities are reigning in credit……markets tend to be flat or go down.
When more credit is provided, global equities tend to go down.
Important to remember that China is second largest economy globally.
Prior to 2008, when Chinese monetary authority made a move, it didn’t really have an effect on markets.
It now does have an effect on Rest of the World.
General uncertainty about the direction of central bank policy remains high.
As shown by the blue line.
When it is elevated, it can be an indication of recession; the red shaded areas show the last two major recessions.
With the blue line rising as it has been over the last few years, it is sensible to consider that recession could happen.
Various issues;
Fed…..Trump influence on chairman Powell.
Brexit
US-China trade uncertainty
Argentina
Policy news
But despite all this, it doesn’t necessarily imply recession. As mentioned previously, our view leans more towards slowing growth.
(2012 peak in blue line was ECB intervention)
(2017 peak was China devaluing renminbi)
Everyone worries about inflation.
Developed market inflation target is 2%.
Blue line shows expected inflation & grey line shows price of oil.
For inflation to be above 2%, oil price has to be at USD60-70 a barrel. Given conditions in oil market (such as over supply & slowing demand) , difficult to see how it can rise to this level again any time soon.
Outcome – with inflation subdued, unlikely that rates will be increased which means the monetary environment remains accommodative.
This leads nicely in to understanding the current state of central bank balance sheets.
This chart shows total global central bank balance sheets assets & shows that when central banks have been more or less accommodative.
Outcome – correlation between more accommodative policy & rising risk assets.
That said, not necessarily a reason to increase exposure to risk assets at this point.
Always important to look at what bond markets are telling us.
Historically, when spreads converge, recessions usually happen 6-12 months later.
This time might be different though; ECB has gone negative which has never happened before.
Another signal that while recession odds are not flashing up a 100% likelihood, they have increased & we should be cautious.
This chart looks at periods of recession going back to the 1970s.
The blue, grey & green lines measure the level of leverage, risk & credit in the US financial system.
When these lines are above the zero level, financial conditions are tighter & vice versa when they are below the zero line.
When there is a shock move above the zero line, there tends to be a recession then or soon after.
Current levels support the view that we are unlikely to see recession.
CAPE stands for cyclically adjusted price earnings & measures the valuations of companies in the S&P 500 index.
You can see here the levels at which the aggregate number for the valuation of these companies is considered to be expensive / overvalued or cheap / undervalued.
Right now, it is extended.
Why? Because large cap companies are trading at high multiples.
US looks expensive.
We are underweight US equities.
Note that we are long way from fair value.
People have talked about how odd the markets look at the moment, & indeed have looked over recent years.
This is particularly evident when we look at the relationship between equity & fixed income markets.
Bonds have been in massive bubble for a long time. Longer than many of us realise.
Certain economies have negative rates & many government bonds have very low to zero to negative yields.
Chart shows that equities are cheap relative to bonds.
Bizarrely, people are buying bonds for capital appreciation & equities for income.
Other recession indicators to watch are the US conference board leading economic indicator & the US Institute of Supply Management manufacturing PMI.
Manufacturing (grey line) is not in recession but is slowing from peak levels in 2017.
This is correlated with the Leading Economic Indicator.
More of warning sign for where we are in the business cycle rather than a harbinger of recession.
We have talked about the US a fair amount, important given that it is the world’s largest economy.
Turning to the UK briefly, UK leading economic indicators do imply the possibility of recession.
Not all of this is Brexit-related but everyone hates uncertainty…..& that can lead to recession.
Q1 = +0.5%
Q2 = -0.2%
Q3 = released on 30th September.
Still actively engaged in equities.
o/w – EM / Japan / Asia / Europe (moderate)
u/w – US / UK
Equity carve-out of the Balanced strategy performing well YTD and has been the principle source of our outperformance – accounting for over 90% of overall return YTD. The resurgence of active management continues so far in 2019.
All fixed income funds outperforming YTD compared to just 1 of the 5 last year. The performance shape and texture of the Fixed Income carve out is exactly what we want to see – acting as the low vol anchor on the overall portfolio with good metrics on up market capture and equally so on down market capture.
Property and gold exposure solely still in alternatives. Property up 11.5% YTD and outperforming but gold fairly uninspiring YTD. Included due to its downside protection characteristics when markets correct on geopolitical noise (and did offer that in Q4 2018) but the prevalence of that noise is dissipating of late.
Still a relatively uninspiring allocation on the face of it but remember this exposure albeit very small compliments our underweight to fixed income and has in aggregate performed better than the fixed income allocation. We have exited one GAM fund in this carve-out and now solely hold one external global macro fund. It’s a small and relatively low impact allocation for us but would increase should we get more bearish on fixed income.