Patrician Revolt Research Paper

Patrician Revolt Research Paper
Introduction
According to Morey (1901) The Roman Republic were comprised of The Patrician and Plebeian
Classes. However, in no shape or form did these two classes have the same rights. Perhaps more
succinctly put, the Plebeians did not enjoy the same rights from an economic and political
standpoint as did the Patricians of Roman Society. This paper serves to discuss these and other
conditions which ultimately led to the Plebeian revolt of Ancient Rome.
The end of Monarchy in Rome
Kings ruled in the Roman Empire for countless years however, over time, the Roman population
became increasingly disenfranchised with tyranny and the monarchs who ruled the land, as a result,
the Plebeians and Patricians united in their efforts to rid Rome of its Monarchy ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, power utterly and completely fell to the Patricians to the extent that they held all of the
new offices, to include seats on the Senate. In addition, the new republic was aristocratic in nature
and not at all democratic. This meant that absolute power was held by a wealthy few which did not
adequately represent the whole of society. This wealthy few were largely Patrician.
THE INEVITABILITY OF THE PLEBEIAN REVOLT 3
Non Inclusive Laws
The Plebeian community consisted of laborers such as farmers and builders as a result; they lived
outside of the protection of the city walls. Ironically, during times of war, while fighting, farmland
and homes were often neglected or even destroyed by the enemy during conflict. Interestingly while
serving their country, the plebeians were deprived of their means of survival which is ultimately
what led to their extreme poverty as they no longer had the means to support themselves.
To further exacerbate the problem, the law of debt was enacted in such a way where in order to
survive the Plebeians had to borrow money. In doing so they were subsequently reduced to a debtor
class where if the debt went unpaid, the borrower was subject to arrest, prison, or even made the
slave of their creditors. Morey (1901)
Land
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

What Is The Difference Between The Patrician And The...
Introduction:
The unit asked about the Economic and political Difference between the patrician and the plebeian
class ultimately led to Plebeian revolt and asked the results of the first revolt or secession.
Therefore, my research paper also focusing on this historic development, from this unit
understanding that I have gathered the Patricians and Plebeian classes together made up the Roman
Republic. These two historic classes development surprisingly was being together and united in
their efforts to drive out the king leadership. However, after the kingship ended both are not entirely
treated the same and they did not share equal rights. They differed economically and politically.
Ultimately, their different impact and unfortunately led what would become a plebeian revolt within
Rome. According to Morey, W. (1901), "In Ancient Rome history development", the patricians and
plebeians made a great history by United and in their effort drive out the monarchy kingship system.
This was the time the Roman populous was fed up with their tyrant Kings. The time when they were
overthrowing the Kings, such as Brutus, they began to make new laws, and make many political
changes such as the valerian laws. Condemning anyone claiming to be King as traitor, the formation
of three voting assemblies, etc. but backtracking, even though both united in order to overthrow the
Kings, Unfortunately, upon the overthrow of the kingship and the birth of the new republic, the
major victories, and power fell into hands of the patricians only.
One great example is. "The comitia centuriata" is one of the three voting assemblies. From the
Romans, historic statement information record shows that it is true plebeians, still vote in the
comitia centuriata; but the point is they could never hold any of the new offices since then, nor
could they sit in the Senate. This makes a big difference between the two and mostly the power of
the patrician's domination affected and the hurts plebeians very hard. It was not only politically but
the dominant was with every scenario such as including politics, economics, integrity, and
sustainability, also right and the freedom of plebeians was affected under the

The Struggles Of The Orders
A1. The "Struggles of the Orders" was when the Plebians rebelled against the Patricians for changes
of their way of life because they did not like the way they were treated and had no say. The Plebians
did not know their own laws because there was no tablets or written documents saying all of the
laws. The Plebians wanted to make their own laws and have their own representatives kind of like
our House of Representatives. They make up a big bulk of the population and the Army, so they
could try and influence change. In 494 BCE the Plebians end up going on a strike against the
Patricians. The outcome of the strike was successful for the Plebians. They were able to get the
Patricians to write down all of the laws on 12 bronze tablets. They were able to have their own
representative called a Tribune that was able to veto acts of the consuls of the senate. There were
laws in place against physically harming a tribune. Plebians were able to marry into the Patrician
class. They were also granted to the write to have at least one consul must be Plebian.
A2. When the Romans conquered more land and saw the way the Greeks were living and saw all of
the beautiful buildings they had they started to adapt some of the Greek ways. They saw all of the
amazing statues, baths and gymnasiums that the Greeks had and they started building their own. The
Romans started their own cosmopolitan. They also adapted the Greek literature and language for
their own amusement like poetry and plays they

Economic And Political Differences Between The Patricians...
Introduction
In the fight for Rome's transfer from a monarchy to a republic, the Roman populace united in its
entirety to achieve one goal, to get rid of the kings. The Roman population consisted of two classes:
The Patricians and The Plebians, in which their unity was crucial in the long struggle of ending the
unjust monarchy. While the plebians were less privileged in the aspects of economics and politics
under the former monarchy, the early Roman Republic witnessed an absolute domination from the
patricians to the economic and political life in Rome. The patricians' oppression put the plebians in
even greater distress than they already suffered under the rule of the kings, which led to an
inevitable revolt, known as the first secession. This paper discusses the economic and political
differences between the patrician and the plebeian classes that ultimately led to the first plebeian
revolt.
Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians and the Plebians
According to the Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica (1998), "Patricians were members of a group
of citizen families who, in contrast with the Plebeian class, formed a privileged class in early
Rome". With the Roman Republic entering a new era after eradicating the monarchy, the patricians
practiced total control over the Roman affairs and claimed all the economic and political spoils.
They dominated the political positions and decision making was exclusive to them while taking
control of the protected lands and

How The Strict Social Classes Of Ancient Rome
Early in Roman society classes were divided by strict customs. However, in order to maintain their
power Rome began to change the rules of society. This change allowed the people to move classes
therefore gaining more capable men to lead. Throughout the reign of the Roman Empire there were
several classes, most notably were the Patricians, Senators, Plebeians, Freemen, and Slaves.
(McKay, et al., 2014). Society was based on heredity, property, wealth, citizenship, and freedom.
The Patricians were the pinnacle of Roman elite just below the emperor and his relatives. Patrician
refers to those members that were of the ruling class of Ancient Rome. They were the ones who
derived from the old ruling elite and powerful families. We know that the

Compare And Contrast The Revolt Of Patricians And Plebeians
Introduction
During the period when the Roman Kingdom was struggling under the tyranny of Tarquin,
Patricians and the plebeians had united in their efforts to drive out the king. However, after the
kingdom was overthrown, the patricians became powerful in the Roman republic, which was an
aristocratic government, rather than democratic (Morey, n.d.).
In this paper, I'll compare and contrast between the patricians and the plebeians, and address what
drove the plebeians to revolt and carry out a secession.
Allow me to open this discussion by first defining patricians and plebeians. The patricians is a term
that originally referred to a group of ruling class families in ancient Rome. ("Patrician
(ancient Rome)", n.d.) The plebeians, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The plebeians seceded from the army and declared not to participate in the wars. They made camp
on the Sacred Mount
(Mons Sacer) in 494BC, and this secession led to a negotiated settlement with the patricians. The
patricians saw that the loss of the plebeian army would be the destruction of Rome, and that
compelled the disbanding of the harsh law of debt. Moreover, the creation of the "Tribune of the
Plebs (Tribunes of the people)" was a revolutionary result of the first secession. It protected the
plebeians from the oppressive acts of patricians and gave them the rights to veto, which can forbid
harmful rules for the plebeians (Morey, n.d.). These were positive improvements for the
The Patricians and The Plebeians, and The Causes and Consequences of The Revolt plebeians, but
there was still another great cause of complaint for them, which was the unjust land distribution.
A patriot and statesmen named Spurious Cassius made the effort to changing the unjust land
distribution. He did so by proposing the first "agrarian law", a law that intended to reform the
division of the public land in 486BC s (Morey, n.d.). Cassius' intention was not to take away

Patricians And Plebeians In Ancient Rome
In ancient Rome, citizens were classified into two separate groups: patrician or plebeian. The
patricians were the privileged class of citizens in early Rome; they had the nobility of birth, were
wealthy, and monopolized the political and religious aspects of Rome in early times ("Patrician,"
2014, para. 2). In contrast, the plebeians were the general citizenry that made up the majority of the
Roman population; initially, they were excluded from the Senate and all public offices ("Plebeian,"
2014, para. 1). The distinction was possibly based on wealth and influence of certain aristocratic
families that became the patricians; intermarriage was also forbidden between the two classes in the
beginning ("Plebeian," 2014, para. 1). Originally, Rome ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
6 UNIT 4 ASSIGNMENT – PATRICIANS AND PLEBEIANS Furthermore, the Plebeian Assembly,
which had previously been held occasionally, would become a permanent assembly thereafter. This
assembly, the concilium plebis, could be called together by the tribunes to address the interests of
the people, and no magistrate could interrupt or break up the assembly (Morey, 1901b, the First
Secession and Its Results section, para. 3). Additionally, resolutions binding upon the plebeians
could also be passed by the assembly. As such, the plebeians finally acquired a position in the state.
5. Conclusion Up until the first secession, the plebeians suffered from poverty and continual debt
caused by the unfair Roman debt law. The political and economic oppression of the patricians had
driven the plebeians to revolt. As a result, the patricians were forced to acknowledge the importance
of plebeian army in Rome's national defence against foreign enemies. Hence, the plebeians fought
for and finally acquired their first foothold in the Roman politics. There would be other revolts later
on that would involve further improvements to plebeian class; however, the first secession was the
initial step that the plebeians took in fighting for their own

Roman Women And Men Rights
Men and women did not have the same rights as each other. The romans limited citizenship and did
not let everyone vote and could not be elected. Slaves were considered property and lacked
personhood. Women could not vote or hold political office. Men were named more frequently than
women by Roman historians. "Plebeians" were peasants compared to others. They lived in
apartments but had no political rights. If they were lucky enough, they could be a client or a
"Obedient servant" to a Patrician family. The family would in return offer their protection to the
servant. Patricians were powerful, noble, ancient families. They were wealthy, lived in large homes
and had political power in the Senate. They only married and had businesses with their

Difference Between Patricians And Plebeians
Introduction
The patricians and plebeians were the two tribes that united to rule out the kingship in Rome. When
the struggle to remove kingship ended, the patricians gained more power from the victory than its
alliance the plebeians. Even though the plebeians could vote in the comitia centuriata, they could
not hold office. Patricians were richer as compared to plebeians and despite Rome becoming a
republic; it was an aristocratic way of government and not democracy. In this text I am to discuss
how this economic and political imbalance between the two orders led to the inferior Romans
known as plebeian to revolt.
The struggle against kingship left the plebeians poorer because they left their homes at most time,
they are the ones who ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, they were not satisfied because the political powers still belonged to the patricians and the
law was administered solely by patrician. So the plebeians now demanded political equality and
rights. This resulted in the second secession of the plebeians. The plebeians could be charged
unjustly because the law was only known by the patricians. Harsa the tribune proposed that the law
be in writing and be published but it wasn't approved until ten years later when the group of ten men
called decemvirs gathered to draw up the law. They formed the XII Table which was a set of laws.
However, the law was still not fair to the plebeians because the patricians still claimed that they had
the power of life and death. This marked the beginning of the second secession. The tragic death of
Virginia aroused the people to vengeance, after killing her daughter, with his bloody knife in his
hands Virginius ran to the soldiers and asked them to resist the power of the decemvirs (William,
Ch. 8). The army followed by citizens took their station again to the hill and decided not to defend
the tranny. Before the state could be ruined the decemvirs were forced to resign and the Valerio–
Horatian law was passed. This resulted in the plebeians to be given the rights to form laws abiding
all Romans in the assembly. From this point the right of intermarriage was upheld and the plebeians
had equal political rights with the

Patricians And The Plebs Research Paper
Dr. Ng, The situation between the patricians and the plebs were just social classification that had
some aims for the Roman executives that the plebs seemed just like foreigners, although they were
rich, very rich, poor, or military personal. Yes, they involved in many business and military
activities, but they were not allowed to be commanders or leaders in the military at first, but later,
the plebs took the advantage of some privileges after the social reform, for example, Lex Licinia
Sextia. The plebs demanded for social reforms because they wanted to pay off their debts, to make
profits through their lands and farms, to have lands to use and make them be profitable for
themselves, and to have some executive duties to represent the other

The Plebeians In Ancient Rome
Plebeians were critical to the security of Rome as well as to its economic, political and social
development.
Military and economic importance
The second Etruscan king (Servius Tullius) was perhaps the first Roman leader to explicitly
recognize the plebeians' military and economic potential. Accordingly, he instituted reforms that
included redistributing Rome into local geographic districts whose inhabitants, patrician and
plebeian alike, formed new "tribes" – 20 in total. All such tribesmen were then required to serve in
the army and to pay taxes (Morey, 1901, Chapter V).
Together with re–organisation of the army, this greatly enhanced Rome's military capabilities
enabling the conquest of neighbouring lands and the overthrow of the monarchy. Ultimately, with
astute building of lasting alliances and incorporation of outlying towns into the Roman domain and
their inhabitants into Roman citizenship, Rome came to dominate across the Italian peninsula and in
the south. However, this would not have been the case without the initial capability provided by the
plebeians. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While slaves were a crucial component of the labour force, the agrarian economy was largely based
on production from small land–holdings, often worked by tenant farmers (Crystalinks, n.d.; Kehoe,
n.d.). These farmers were usually plebeians, as were the majority of vendors in marketplaces.
Produce and other goods were supplied via the plebeians.
In addition, as in ancient Greece, attitudes to trade amongst the higher classes were often ambivalent
or negative (Cartwright, 2013). It is therefore likely that the plebeians played a significant role in

Differences In Ancient Rome
Written Assignment Unit 4: The Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians and the
Plebeian Classes and the Results of the Revolt
Ancient Rome was comprised of two main classes of people; the Patricians and the Plebeians. Their
many differences in both economic and political status lead the way to the uprising and revolt of the
Plebeians that would forever change the economic fairness and governing of Rome.
The term Patrician refers to the ruling class of Ancient Rome. They were derived from the old
governing elite and Senatorial families. According to Roman Tradition Romulus, himself, created
and divided the Patrician class. As a show of self–importance, they were appointed by the Founder
of Rome. Also, it is factual that they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The hosted strikes and would leave the city for a time of refusal to work and even participate in the
Army. These walkouts would significantly cripple Rome as we have learned that the Plebeians were
the craftsmen and laborer of the country. Over time, and many battles, the Patricians gave into many
of the demands of the Plebeians. They were granted the right of running and holding more
prominent positions in the government. They were given the right to marry within both classes.
One of the first concessions granted to the Plebeians was the Law of the Twelve Tables. This would
ensure the protection of fundamental rights and that their voices were heard and also that the laws
were applied fairly and justly to both classes. As the revolt progressed, the Plebeians gained the
right to elect their governmental officials, Tribune, who represented them and fought solely for their
rights and had veto power over the Roman Senate.
As time passed, fewer laws existed between the two classes. The Plebeians could and would be
elected to the Senate as well as the Consuls. Both classes could now inter–marry. There now existed
wealthy Plebeians who ultimately became part of Roman Nobility. Despite the enormous changes,
the Patricians would continue to hold a majority in the wealth and power of

How Did Social Class Change In Ancient Rome
Imagine that you were a citizen in Ancient rome. Would you be a patrician or a plebeian? Plebeians
are the lower class of ancient rome and make up 95% of the population. Patricians were the upper
class of ancient rome and made up 5% of the population. Having 2 different Social classes causes
their to be change in the Social, Political and Economical Characteristics of Ancient Rome.
A political aspect of anger rome was the forms of government they had. The 2 social classes
affected this because they helped shaper rome. According to Rome as a World of Power ""Rome
became a republic, but it was an aristocratic, and not a democratic republic" (2).The patrician had all
the say in the government to start. It could also be classified as an oligarchy. Having a republic or an
oligarchy relates to political because it is a form of government and their problems that were caused.
But soon the plebeians rebelled and the patricians agreed to let citizens vote. But it was not
everybody who lived in rome was a citizen. In the article Rome as a World of Power it says that
"The inhabitants of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Ancient Rome, the plebeians lived in the country and the patricians lived in the city. According to
Rome as a World of Power, "Patricians, for the most part, lived in the city; and their property was
protected by the city walls. But the homes of the plebeians were generally in the country" (3). This
means that the poor people lived in the country, while the rich had nice homes that were safe. This
affected geography because the 2 social classes were in different locations caused the people to be
more scattered out across the way and change population density. Since 5% of the population was
patricians the patricians that did live in the country often owned farms and had slaves do work for
them. So, it caused their to be much higher population density it certain sections. It was not an even

Patricians And Plebeians Essay
The Gap between the Patricians and the Plebeians
Introduction
After the kingship, the consulship was the first form of government established tin Rome. In those
days, Rome was experiencing the Republic for the first time. Consequently, the political, social and
economic structure of Rome was an emerging one. The upcoming events would finally shape the
definitive government form of the republic. Anyway, we can clearly assert that at the genesis of the
Roman republic the political system was rather an Aristocratic one, instead of a Democratic one. In
other words, the inequality between the Patricians and the Plebeians described a contrasting
landscape. Thus, those lines are about to discuss how the economic and political differences
between both patrician and plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian revolt.
Development
After the destitution of the king, Rome has become a new "kingship"; since the patricians who have
all the power were so despotic to the plebeians. If both patricians and plebeians did like the king;
they also have some dissimilarity. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
So the patricians knew that in spite of the divergence they should preserve their unity with the
plebeians. The project of creating an independent city was unacceptable and inconceivable by the
patricians who cannot exist without the plebeians. Finally, the patricians had made some concession
to the plebeians. That's why, the plebeians created the Tribune of the People which served as a
"counter power" for the plebeians. The Tribune of the People allowed the plebeians to veto the
despotic laws of the patricians. In addition, the debts were canceled and the prisoners were free.
Moreover, the Plebeians Assembly gives any plebeians a say in the public affairs of Rome. Finally,
the Agrarian Law of Spurius Cassius would be considered as the satisfaction point of the plebeians.
However, he was the victim of a conspiracy and died with his goodwill to better the plebeians'

The Patricians And Aristocratic Republic
INTRODUCTION The Patricians and Plebeians were initially united and drove out the last King of
Rome, Tarquinius Superbus, along with his whole family in B.C.510. This allowed Rome and the
Roman people to transition from a Kingdom to a Republic, however, because of certain
circumstances, the Plebeians were not allowed to fully participate politically and ended up as a
subservient class to the Patricians. This created what is called an Aristocratic Republic and not a
Democratic Republic. This difference in political and economic power between these two groups
ultimately led to the Plebeian revolt. CAUSES As a general rule, the plebeians lived in the
countryside and had farms and other property outside of the protection of the city walls and the
patricians mostly lived within the city walls. During the wars this created the situation where when
the plebeians were serving in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This basically put them into a debtor class which if they fell behind in their payments they were
likely to be arrested, thrown into a dungeon, and made the slave of their creditor.(Morey, 1901) The
terms were such that it was difficult, if not impossible, for someone to pay off their debts and move
out of the debtor class. The effect was to basically keep the poor in a perpetual state of poverty. This
obviously did not sit well with the plebeians and was a major source of discontent for them. This
was referred to as the Unjust Law of Debt. Another issue that kept the plebeians perpetually poverty
stricken was the fact that public lands that had been acquired in war were not distributed equally
amongst all people but instead were rented out to members of the patricians. This effectively tied up
the land in perpetuity and it was unable to be rented or sold to anyone else as long as it was in this
condition. This was referred to as the Unequal Division of the Public

The Plebeian Revolution
discuss how the economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes
ultimately led to a plebeian revolt. Include in your discussion the results of the first revolt or
secession. Greek and Roman Civilization Unit4 Assignment Early Roman Republic; Conquest of
Italy University of the People Introduction My paper will quickly outline or educate reader(s), the
economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes eventually led to
a plebeian revolt. I will also include in my paper information about the first revolt or secession. I
believe it's fair to say that the Patricians people were very wealthy. This being said, they perhaps
were the leaders of the more important ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Plebeians were the merchants, farmers, and the craft workers of Rome. The Plebeians refused to
fight in Rom's way in after the Senate declared war in 491 BC. This was because the Patricians
forbade the Plebeians from taking part in the Senate, so they stood their grounds and decided not to
take part in their war. It is told that the Plebeians removed themselves from the city until a time they
had the right to elect their own leaders, which This Historians calls the struggle of the orders. Also,
their great struggle aid in the continued effort of the plebeians to achieve political equality to safe
guard economic relief for their less fortunate people, and to break the political and religious control
(monopoly) of the patricians. The Plebeians didn't remain under the control the Patricians forever. It
took some time, but bit by bit, closer to the end of the early republic they were partly successful and
took back some control they could of the old priesthoods, the office of interim head of state and
possibly the senate leader. In the late republic to the 1st century BC, distinctions between patricians
and plebeians lost political importance for differences or distinctions; in fact, some patricians were
adopted and became plebeians and so on. Regarding the first plebian revolt: It led to the removal of
debts and the freedom at last from the hash laws and control they were put under. According to the
Encyclopedia Britannica (n.d.) the tribune was elected by the plebeians which symbolizes freedom
and where their people now had a voice. Their objectives were to offer their people, mostly the less
privilege a better and safe livelihood. The

Republic And Struggles Of Plebeians
The Rise of Republic and Struggle of Plebeians
Introduction
It was the unification of two classes of Rome (Patricians and plebeians) against the tyranny of
kingship that gave birth to the republic of Rome, however, it was the patrician who gained more
power and influence in government and began to rule the lower–class plebeians. Eventually the
plebeians were successful to change the unfair condition and gain many political rights.
The unfair share of power
After the rebellion against the last roman king, the wealthier patrician made the all aspects of
political power exclusive to themselves. All the important officials and religious figures were and
should elected from these upper class of romans. The two most important branches of political
power after the fall of kingship was the senate and the consuls but neither the members of the senate
or the two consuls were elected from the lower–class plebeians. The only place that the plebeians
could participate in political power was the Comitia Centuriata, and even in this assembly their say
was ineffective since most of the members of this assembly were also aristocrat patricians.
The hardship of plebeians' condition ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While the wealthy patrician was living behind safe city walls and their properties and families were
well protected, the poor plebeians were living in the country with no such protection for their
families, their little houses and farms. At the time of wars these disparate people had to join the
army and fight for the all romans including those rich patricians as their unprotected farms and
properties destroyed by the enemies and their families had been taken away from their houses. Their
situation was so bad that even some slaves who were living with patricians had a better standard of
living compared to many

A Marxist Reading of Shakespeare's Coriolanus Essay examples
A Marxist Reading of Coriolanus
One popular dissecting instrument of any Shakespearean character is the modern tool of
psychoanalysis. Many of Shakespeare's great tragic heroes–Macbeth, Hamlet, King Lear, and
Othello, to name a few–have all been understood by this method of plying back and interpreting the
layers of motivation and desire that constitute every individual. Add to this list Shakespeare's
Roman warrior Coriolanus. His strong maternal ties coupled with his aggressive and intractable
nature have been ideal fodder for modern psychoanalytic interpretation. This interpretation,
however, falls within a larger, political context. For despite the fact that Coriolanus is a tragedy
largely because of the foibles of its title ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Marxism, essentially, is a theory of the proletarian liberation movement. This theory is dialectic in
that society is seen as a composition of contraries (e.g., rich vs. poor), and that what makes
humanity evolve is the struggle between these contraries. The triumph of one over the other
produces change. Change, however, is resisted by the ruling class because most, if not all, of the
wealth is concentrated in their hands; they in turn control the means of production, allowing them to
exploit the workers for their own ends and widen the gap between the rich and poor even more in
the process. This situation produces alienation in the worker; it deprives him of something, and this
is not only degrading but depersonalizing as well (Appignanesi, 79).
From this perspective, Menenius' fable of the belly is clearly fallacious and intended to instill a false
state of consciousness in his listeners. The tale deflects the cause of the plebeians hunger from the
patricians right back at the plebeians themselves:
... For the dearth,
The gods, not the patricians, make it, and
Your knees to them, not arms, must help (I.i.63–65).
Modern capitalist apologists use much the same argument as this, only instead of directing the
working class to pray to the gods to better their lot in life, they

What Was The Conflict Between The Plebeians And The...
The Plebeians and the Patricians
Introduction
Ancient Rome consisted of two different social classes: the plebeians and the patricians. The
patricians were the wealthy, upper class, whereas the plebeians were everyone else. Although
outnumbered by the plebeians, patricians saw themselves as morally superior, and this caused much
conflict among Roman life. The quest for power, equal rights, and land further fueled this discord. It
took a series of laws, disagreements, and even a revolt, to level the playing field among both parties.
In this paper, I will discuss the qualities of each class, the changes in law that affected them, the
revolt the ensued, and the results.
Body
The patricians were a group of people who contained massive ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This left them resentful. Four, was the unequal distribution of land. Although all lands were owned
by the people, the plebeians were denied them. They were allowed to occupy the land, but had to
pay rent to their patrician overlords. This angered them.
The plebeian plight changed in 494 BC. At this time, there was a revolt. Plebeians, fed up with the
way they were treated by the Roman government, rose up against the patricians. They called this
struggle, "The Conflict of the Orders." This lasted for about 200 years. As a result, plebeians gained
more rights. They also fought back by protesting, going on strike, and refusing to work. Many fled
the city of Rome to live elsewhere. This made a lasting impression on the Roman government. A
host a rights followed: the right to marry patricians, own land, and run for religious and political
positions.
Following the Conflict of the Orders, plebeians were granted many new political positions. One of
these was known as a "Tribune." They were elected by fellow plebeians and had the power to veto
new laws from the Roman Senate. As time progressed, many plebeians acquired more wealth. They
were regarded as nobles, and could intermarry with patricians. Many were also elected to the
Senate, and worked as consuls. Despite these changes, the patricians still had the majority of the
power. The Agrarian Law, suggested by consul member Spurius Cassius,

What Are The Differences Between The Patricians And...
The Patricians were a privileged class of Roman citizens, membership in the Patrician class was
hereditary and was only ever achieved by birth. On the other hand, the Plebeians were all of the
citizens of Rome whom weren't Patricians. Plebeians were average working citizens of Rome –
farmers, bakers, builders or craftsmen – who worked hard to support their families and pay their
taxes. Romans were in fact able to tell whether you were a Patrician or a Plebeian simply by hearing
your second name, this had a major impact on both the Plebeians and Patricians ... Show more
There began to be a lot of clashes between the people, the way the Patricians ruled began to irritate
the Plebeians, bringing them to the edge of revolt. Lucius Sicinius Vellutus advised the plebeians to
secede en masse to the Mons Sacer (The Sacred Mount), a hill outside of Rome. The senate was
panicked by this and dispatched Agrippa Menenius Lanatus, a former consul who was liked by the
Plebeians, they saw him as one of their own. Menenius was well received and told them the fable of
the belly and the limbs, comparing the people to the limbs who chose not to support the belly–and
thus starved themselves, just as the belly and the limbs, the city could not survive without the
Patricians and Plebeians working together in unison. Plebeians negotiated for their return to the city
under one condition. They wanted tribunes to be appointed to represent the Plebeians and to protect
them from the consuls power. Over two decades later, another tribune, Lucius Genucius, had a law
passed requiring

Patricianss And Plebeians Research Paper
THE PATRICIANS AND THE PLEBEIANS After the fall of the kingship, Rome was essentially
made up of two economic classes of free people. The first were the Patricians, who were the wealthy
who according to legend were the descendants of Romulus, founder or Rome. (Morey, 1901) The
second group, were the middle to lower class called Plebeians, or Plebes for short. As is the case in
many societies, the interests of the aristocracy and the common people were at odds. Under the new
Roman Republic, the Patricians had all of the economic, social, and political power, and the
Plebeians had very little opportunity to arise from their class. As one would expect, this was a recipe
for conflict between the classes. While plebeians were serving in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The plebeians had been rendered impoverished by wars, and as a result many had borrowed money
from the rich. Under the law of debt, if they were unable to pay their debt they could be arrested,
imprisoned, or even lose their freedom. (Gill,n.d) Also, the plebeians were not equal partakers in the
spoils of war. Lands seized from the enemy during war should have been public property and as
such should have afforded the plebes an equal share, but that was not what occurred. Since political
power resided with the patricians, they saw to it that land distribution benefited their own interests.
The patricians were allowed "occupy" land plots at a small rent rate and thereby kept the land under
their control for long periods of time. (Gill, n.d.) These grievances led the plebeians to revolt by
refusing to serve the interests of the patricians by serving in the army. In 494 BC they deserted their
general's army and assembled at a placed called Anio seeking to establish an independent state. This
event became known as the first secession of the plebes. When the patricians saw that without the
plebeians serving in their army would mean the demise of Rome, they canceled their debt and
release economic prisoners. (Morey,

Patricians Vs Plebeians
In this paper we will be discussing The Economic and Political differences between the Patricians
and the Plebeian classes. In ancient Rome, the patricians were "the wealthy landowners that
generally had a residence in the metropolis and a villa in the u.s.a. of us run by means of slaves. The
plebeians should nonetheless vote inside the comitia centuriata; but they could not maintain any of
the modern day offices, nor must they sit inside the Senate. They had been the noblemen, the
aristocrats, and the higher elegance ruling elegance. It wouldn't have been so terrible, and the
plebeians might now not were in such an uproar had the patricians no longer used their political
energy in such pompous and abusive approaches. It's miles recounted ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After the spoils of conflict, the ruling patricians unfairly and unequally divided and disbursed the
public land in addition to a few different subjects. With the plebeians already disenchanted and
already feeling as though their remedy changed into unfair, the patricians simply made it worse.
Those troubles are in reality scratching the floor although. Among the referred to troubles along
with not being capable of take a seat inside the Senate, not being able to maintain place of job,
between the plebeians being disillusioned about their land being destroyed in struggle at the same
time as the patricians land modified into covered, and the plebeians being constantly in debt to the
patricians changed into sufficient to begin a revolution. So when they went to struggle they were
prevented for the exceptional of everybody. They already have been generally not as wealthy due to
the fact the patricians. But they were the regular citizens which have been not taken into
consideration elite and were those

The Twelve Tables Argument
The Twelve Tables were drawn up by the ten appointed patrician decemvir under the public pressure
around 449 B.C.. They probably were the elder to be qualified as a experienced statement, but they
must be the male Roman citizens. There are a lot of bias in The Twelve Tables, such as pro
patriarchy, pro preseving blood line, pro–male, pro–healthy offspring, and the most obvious was
pro–patricians. Laws in The Twelve Tables targeted plebeians and have a presence to patricians. For
example, it prohibited "the intermarriage between plebeians and patricians"(XI, 1). In order to
preserve the power in a small social group, such as the patrician, the intermarriage between the
different social classes was strictly prohibited. In this way, the power

The Class Struggle Between The Plebeians And The Patricians
Running Head: THE CLASS STRUGGLE 1 THE CLASS STRUGGLE 4 The Class Struggle
between the Plebeians and the Plebeians Hieu Le Columbia Southern University 04/07//2016 The
Class Struggle between the Plebeians and the Patricians In ancient Rome, there were two classes the
Patricians who were the descendants of the senators appointed by King Romulus, and the Plebeians
or plebs who were the free and lower class people. There was a growing tension between the two
classes right from the foundation of Rome. The tension escaladed following the fall of Etruscan king
and the declaration of Rome as a republic; the rise of aristocrats? leadership. As Rome became
economically weaker, the Plebeians were marginalized both politically and economically

Greek And Roman Civilization Essay
HIST 1421: GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION
What are the Economic and Political Differences Between the Patricians & the Plebeian class
ultimately led to Plebeian Revolt HIST 1421: Greek and Roman Civilization Written Assignment
Unit 4 University of the People Term 5 (2016–2017) Introduction:
The unit 4 written assignments asked about the Economic and political Defenses between the
patrician and the plebeian class ultimately led to Plebeian revolt and asked the results of the first
revolt or secession. Therefore, my research paper also focusing into this historic development, from
this unit ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When they were overthrowing the Kings, such as Brutus, they began to make new laws and make
many political changes such as the valerian laws, condemning anyone claiming to be King as traitor,
the formation of three voting assemblies, etc. but backtracking, in order to overthrow the Kings, the
patricians and plebeians united in their efforts to rid of them. Unfortunately, upon the overthrow of
the kingship and the birth of the new republic, the major victories and power fell in hands of the
patricians. One such example is this. The comitia centuriata is one of the three voting assemblies.
From the Romans historic statement information "The plebeians could, it is true, still vote in the
comitia centuriata; but they could not hold any of the new offices, nor could they sit in the senate.
The patricians could though. It would not have been so bad, and the plebeians would not have been
in such an uproar had the patricians not used their political power in such pompous and abusive
ways. How the plebeians saw it, the patricians were not better than the kings area, flaunting their
wealth, but doing little good for the poor. There was an economic problem beyond what was just
mentioned within the politics too. It is known that the plebeians and the patricians united in their
fight/ war to rid of the kings. However, there were a number of wars that took place, For the
patricians, in times of war, the city walls, living a

Differences Between Patricians And Plebeian Classes
From the reading, discuss how the economic and political differences between the patricians and the
plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian revolt. Include in your discussion the results of the first
revolt or secession.
The Roman Republic consisted of the Patricians and Plebeian Classes together. Unlike you would
imagine they were not entirely treated the same. They did not share equal rights although both had
some rights unlike slaves. They were different in both economically and politically views and
positions. Finally leading all this to what would become a plebeian revolt within Rome. The
patricians were the rich landowners in Ancient Rome. They have their own house villa in the
country. Their own house villa in the country were run ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, formation of three voting assemblies etc. In this revolt both patricians and plebeians united in
their efforts and get forwarded. But unfortunately, the major victories and power came into the
hands of patricians. Eventually coming to economic problem, at first when they made war against
kings. But patricians were wealthy and had houses. They have secured within the war. They had
protection. But the plebeians are un–wealthy they had no security and hence they lost many of their
lives and many of their families. They mostly added as a fuel in the fire. Their land was ravaged
almost they lost everything their property in the war. This led them to become debtors to the
patricians. As patricians were lending them money and punishing them harshly if they not repaid the
money. After the war they divided the public land and distributed among them and some other
things. The patricians and plebeians had their fair share of differences and strife. Between the
mentioned issues such as not being able to sit in the senate, not being able to hold office, between
the plebeians being upset about their land being destroyed in war while the patricians land was
protected, and the plebeians being constantly in debt to the

Plebians and The Patricians
Initially, plebeians and the patricians were united to drive out the despotic roman kingship. Rome
was ruled by monarch, Morey, (n.d.). The roman king exercised a lot of powers over his subjects,
Morey, (n.d.). "He was the father of the whole nation, chief priest of the national religion, military
commander of the people (of whom he called to arms in time of war), justice was administered by
him and had power of life and death over all subjects, Morey, (n.d.). This may help explain why the
patricians and the plebeians joined hands to drive the kings.
When the struggle was over, power fell into the hands of the patricians marking the beginning of
another struggle– this time between the ruling class (patricians) and plebeians. The plebeians were
relegated to lesser class politically, Morey, (n.d.). They could participate in the "democratic process"
by voting in the comitia centuriata. However, they were not allowed to hold any of the new offices
neither could they sit in the senate, Morey, (n.d.). When they drove the kings out, Rome became a
republic but one which was more of aristocratic than democratic, Morey, (n.d.). This means that the
political power among others was concentrated in the hands of a particular class (few) instead of the
whole people, Morey, (n.d.). This brewed discontent, political discomfort, and discord among the
plebeians. The plebeians would have easily (perhaps) submitted to the patrician government if only
the patricians would have exercised caution

How Did The Patricians Lead To A Plebeian Revolt
Introduction The Patricians and the plebeians formed a strong alliance to remove the kings and
monarchy governments in the old Roman Empire. This led to the end of the kingship in Rome.
However the fruits or the benefits that came out of this victory favored the Patricians more than the
Plebeians. Therefore this essay look at the , three economic and political differences between the
patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to a plebeian revolt. POLIITICAL POWER.
Though united to remove the kings from Rome. There was a gap in the governance system of Rome.
Though it was a republic, it was not a democratic republic but an autocratic republic and the powers
to rule rested in the hands of the Patricians. It is true that the Plebeians did vote in the comitia
centuriata but they could not hold any office and could not sit in the Senate. Beside that the rule o
the Patricians was no difference from the kings in terms of oppression and brutality, hence the
Plebeians could not submit to the rule of the Patricians forever and this was a recipe of revolting. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Patricians by virtual of being in power and rulers were more wealthy than the Plebeians. They
lived in cities, property protected with City cities. The poverty of the Plebeians was compounded by
the fact that they participated in the wars to defeat the kings. They neglected their farms during this
period such that when the war ended, they were left in a very deplorable condition, and because of
the greediness of the Patricians they could not live in the cities but in the country side in the small

Differences Between The Patricians And The Plebeian
Introduction
The patricians and the plebeian were two distinct classes of ancient Roman residence. The patricians
were generation of aristocracy whereas the plebeian were group such as the native peasants,
laborers, merchants and other residence of Italian states that were grabbed by Rome. The plebeian
clearly outnumbered the patricians. Although they live together, their economic and political
differences were so broad that there was always tension between the classes. Because of lack of
policies to bridge these differences, the plebeian who were the lower class had to revolt. In this
paper, I will try to analysis the economic and the political differences between the two classes and
how this inequality led to a plebeian revolt.
Economic
The patricians and the plebeian had united to fight the enemy and after the late war, the plebeian
were left in an economic hardship due to the fact that most of their properties and home were
destroyed by the enemy. On the other hand, the patricians were living in the city and their properties
were not affected by the wars. Due to the fact that the plebeians were mostly located out of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The main cause of this revolt was the harsh law of the debt which there was no legal way to redress
their wrongs (Morey, 1901). They decided to withdrew their generals from the army and allowed the
patricians to fight any war by themselves and marched to a hill farther on the Anio called sacred
mount and proposed to form an independent city.
As the patricians saw what they plebeians were bend to do and knowing that the lost of the
plebeians army will be the destruction of Rome, they were forced to make serious concession and
granted most wished of the plebeians especially the cancellation of debts and the released of
imprisoned debtors. This is how the first plebeians secession

Patricians And Plebeians Essay
The struggle between the Patricians and the Plebeian was a classic example of allies that again
became enemies after a common goal was accomplished. Time and time again we have seen this in
our world's history, and most recently in WWI and WWII. The differences between the two people
were rooted deep, which ultimately resulted in the conflict. Whenever there is any sort of a class
war, it is usually caused by one class feeling oppressed by the other class. You could relate this to
the post–Civil War African Americans, who fought for nearly 100 years to gain the same rights of
the white people they fought side by side with in the bloody conflict. In order to understand the
conflict between the Patricians and the Plebeians, we must first understand how these people
differed politically and economically. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Patricians were mostly wealthy city dwellers, who's property was protected by the city and its
walls. Patricians controlled most of the trade and commerce in the area, and had major influence
over the Plebian people economically. On the other end of the spectrum, the Plebeian's were poor
country folk, who's property was NOT protected by the city and was constantly being overrun by
their enemies when off to fight in the Army. It was very hard for the Plebeian's to stay ahead
because of these factor's, and were often forced into debt by the patrician's, further oppressing them.
Politically, the Plebeian's were just as bad off as they were economically. They had zero power in
Rome's aristocratic democracy, and were basically limited to the will of the Patrician's. because of
this unbalanced political power, Plebeian's who were unable to pay their debt were often arrested
and forced into slavery. This further oppressed the Plebeian people. Furthermore, the unfair division
of public land kept Rome's land that was meant for ALL people in the hands of the

Social Classes In The Roman Republic
The Roman Republic was made up of two social classes, the Patricians, and the Plebeians. Although
these two social classes made up the republic collectively, they were very different, These two
groups shared a better social status than the slaves of Rome, but their economic and social
differences caused many historical problems in Rome, even a revolt. The patricians were very
wealthy, they owned land and slaves, and were known as the upper class in Rome. The patricians
were also known as the aristocrats and had the advantage in the government and decisions in Rome.
The patricians considered themselves to be noble and privileged and a better choice for the ruling
class. They felt that "certain people were born to lead and others were destined to follow." (Wasson,
2018) The Plebeian class were common men of Rome, they were not slaves and were ... Show more
Both social classes were tired of the continuous bad decisions made by trant kings that affected all
people in Rome. Although the Patricians tried to end the rule of the tyrants by measures to curb their
power, for instance, the Valerian Laws. These laws allowed a Roman citizen, condemned to death
the right of appeal to the senators, patricians, and plebeians. Both parties worked together to rid
Rome of bad kings, and that was the beginning of a new Rome, but that was problematic for
Plebeians because the Patricians remained in power despite the help of the Plebeians to rid Rome of
their terrible tyrant kings. The Plebeians felt that the Patricians only rebelled against the king's
power so that they could be in power themselves. After all of the struggling against the monarchs,
the Plebeians made not gains in the political realm of Rome. The Plebeians also felt that the
Patricians made decisions and laws without the poor and lower class in mind, they made laws that
only benefited the upper

Roman Patrician Research Paper
Ancient Rome was split into two classes: the aristocrats, known as the patricians, and the lower
class, known as the plebeians. They lived harmoniously alongside each other for a while, but after
Rome began to rise from it's ashes the plebeians became resentful and decided to take action. To
fully understand the degree of their anger some light needs to be shined on their situation, and how
the patricians treated them.
While Rome was rebuilding itself after the fall of the Roman Kingdom, it was a Republic. Meaning
there were a small group of people that represented the population, making decisions for the
country. In this case they were all patricians. There is an obvious downside to this, all decisions
were made to benefit the patricians while ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the most important changes that occurred was the creation of new positions for plebeians in
the government, tributes and aediles. There were two of each position and they were elected by the
plebeians, the tributes were the voice of the people and the aediles assisted them. The two tributes
has veto power over the patricians, making it so they couldn't create laws that were unjust to
plebeians. Furthermore, the tributes could freely speak their minds, and anyone that obstructed that
freedom could be put to

Differences Between The Patricians And The Plefuan Revolts
Introduction
The republic of Rome was composed of the patricians, the plebeian classes, and the slaves. Unlike
slaves, patricians and plebeians had rights, even if these rights were not the same for both classes,
they were different both economically and politically. Thus we shall analyze how these differences
led to what was to become a plebeian revolt in Rome.
Economic and political differences between the patricians and the plebeian classes ultimately led to
a plebeian revolt
Ancient Rome was made up of three categories of classes: patricians who were rich landowners,
some possessed several houses and villas that were maintained by slaves. They were aristocrats,
nobles of the ruling class. There was a second category which was the plebeian ... Show more
Thus many kings were overthrown by the union of the patricians and the plebeians. Unfortunately,
after the overthrow of royalty and the birth of the new republic, political power fell into the hands of
the patricians who used their power in a very abusive manner. The plebeian could vote but could not
sit on the senate unlike the patricians. But what revolted the plebeians better was the fact that they
saw that the patricians were no better than the kings, they strutted with their riches while making
any attention to the poor.
In addition to the political boundary separating the plebeians from the patricians, there was also an
economic boundary. The patricians being of the nobles living in beautiful and sumptuous houses,
owned, free from all the damage that can cause the war undertaken in agreement with the plebeians.
Their houses were protected by the walls of the city, which was not the case for the plebeians who
were, as mentioned, above farmers, builders, etc., which means ordinary people who lived in Farms,
in ordinary houses with a simple life; and when they went to war, they had no slaves to maintain
their gardens, their houses, their lands, which left behind, and sometimes even pillaged by the
enemy. They went to war not only for themselves but also for the whole country. And, here they find
themselves deprived of everything and sometimes even their families were hunted of their

The Patricians And Patricians
Introduction:
The Republic of Rome was divided into two classes known as the Plebeians and the Patricians.
These two groups of people lived in close proximity with each other but they had different social
statues and were not entirely treated the same. Both classes had rights however the Patricians didn't
share equal rights with their neighbors, the Plebeians. So great was the economic and political
differences between the two classes that it eventually led to a revolt by the Plebeians within Rome.
Body:
In Ancient Rome, the patricians were the wealthy people and also the rich land owners who lived in
the city. They also owned slaves who worked for them. These men were usually composed of
aristocrats, the noblemen and the upper ruling class in Rome. The plebeians, on the other hand, were
the commoners and other free Romans who were the workers, farmers, builders, artisans, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2 tribunes from among the plebeians were elected and had power to forbid any unjustness upon all
citizens. The Plebeians now had representatives in the government.
An agrarian law was also passed that intended to reform the division of public land. Land which
belonged to the whole state would now be justly distributed among all citizens.
Conclusion:
The patricians and plebeians had various differences between them. These issues infuriated the
Plebeians much so that they started an uprising. The patricians didn't share equal rights with their
neighbors the plebeians and not surprisingly, the plebeian revolt occurred. If the patricians had
treated them better I believe there would have been political and economic growth. The patricians
should have treated the Plebeians the same way they wanted to be treated.
References
1.Morey, William C. (1901). Outlines of Roman History. Chapter VII: The Struggle for Economic
Rights. Section I: The Grievances of the Plebs. The Power of the Patricians. Retrieved from

The Plebeians In The Roman Republic
In the Roman Republic, citizens were divided into two political castes: the Patricians and Plebeians.
The Patricians were a wealthy upper class who were descended from the earliest Roman families,
while the Plebeians were essentially "everyone else." As I have explored in the fourth entry of my
Learning Journal, one reason why the Plebeians were so important was that they comprised the vast
majority of Rome's total population. As such, they had certain power to control the direction of the
Republic; without them, Rome could not function, and the Plebeian class put this power to use on
more than one occasion. Their many secessio (secessions) would become known as the Conflict of
the Orders (McManus, n.d.). There were many political and economic differences between the two
orders. Morey refers to them in four categories, though it is probably easier to think of them as two
types of inequality covering a range of greivances. First, there were the political differences;
Plebeians were forbidden from holding political office after the monarchy was replaced with a
republic. But more importantly, there were often–large ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Patricians were much more capable of weathering a period of no income. Additionally,
Patricians would gain control over supposedly public lands, so the wars would make them even
wealthier (Morey, 1901). Livy recalls a particularly vivid incident wherein a war hero charged into
the forum: "His dress was covered with filth, and the condition of his body was even worse, for he
was pale and half dead with emaciation. Besides this, his straggling beard and hair had given a
savage look to his countenance." The war hero explained how, having returned from the war, he
found his farm destroyed and his cottage burnt to

The Patricians And Pleminian Classes In The Roman Republic
Introduction;
The Patricians and Plebeian Classes together made up the Roman Republic. To no surprise, they
were not entirely treated the same. They did not share equal rights, although both had some rights,
unlike slaves. They differed economically and politically. And ultimately, this all led to what would
become a plebeian revolt within Rome.
Body;
in Ancient Rome, the patricians were "the rich landowners that typically had a house in the city and
a villa in the country run by slaves "Rymer, 2014)." They were the noblemen, the aristocrats, and the
upper–class ruling class. on the other hand, there was the plebeian class. These men were free
Romans and were the commoners. it should be noted that many plebeians were in fact very wealthy.
but they were the ordinary citizens that were not considered elite and were those of any tribe
without advisers to the King. These were the workers, the farmers, builders, merchants, artisans, etc.
In the Roman Empire, there was a power struggle going on. And the Roman populous was fed up
with their tyrant kings. During the time when they were overthrowing the kings, such as Brutus,
they began to make new laws and make many political changes such as the Valerian laws,
condemning anyone claiming to be king as a traitor, the formation of three voting assemblies, etc.
but backtracking, in order to overthrow the kings, the patricians and plebeians united in their efforts
to rid of them. Unfortunately, upon the overthrow of the kingship and

How Did The Roman Americans Become Patrician Citizens
At the top of all Roman society were the patricians right next to the emperors. Patricians were elites
just below the emperors. Their lives were high quality and luxurious. The throne was allowed to be
passed to anyone as long as it was approved by the senate. In order to hold their place on the throne,
it would sometimes require backstabbing, betrayal, and even murder. These patricians were often
wealthy landowners, but sometimes others were chosen deliberately for this class.
Most boys born into a patrician family had an extensive education. They were taught poetry,
literature, history, geography, and sometimes mythology. Once they became young men they would
go into politics and government. The patrician families were expected to continue ... Show more
ladder)
The senators could hold the highest official offices in civil

Differences Between The Plefuans And The Patricians
Today for your review, a discussion of the economic and political differences between the patricians
and the plebeians and an examination of the results of the first revolt.
According to Morey, (1901), in such an ironic conclusion, the plebeians had consolidated with the
patricians to overthrow the kings that were in power, and together were successful in this affiliation.
However, while the patricians were awarded lands and gained more power after the kings were
overthrown, there were disastrous results for the plebeians. There are many things that lead to the
revolt, first, while the plebeians had the right to vote, they could not hold a political office, or sit in
the Senate. The rule of the patricians proved to be as oppressive as the kingship had and the struggle
began in earnest between the two classes. Second to add insult to injury the plebeians were even
worse off monetarily.
Not only were there great economic hardships, but the human suffering was just as great, most of
the plebeians lived outside the city walls, with their home and families vulnerable, and while the
plebeian men were away serving their country, fighting in the war, their families were left
unprotected and many had suffered greatly at the hands of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
They deserted their general and decided they would form their own city and defected beyond Anio,
to a hill they called the Sacred Mount. The patricians suddenly realized that this defection would
cause the destruction of the Rome and began negotiations in earnest. A new protocol was made and
it was decided that all the debts would be canceled and any persons that were imprisoned due to
debt were released. The most significant result of this first secession was the appointment of
Tribunes for the

Patrician Revolt Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Donna Kuhns

More from Donna Kuhns (14)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Patrician Revolt Research Paper