Essay On Indian Removal Act Indian Removal Act Indian Removal Act

1. Essay On Indian Removal Act
Quick! Imagine a life of an Indian and how it felt, it was probably nice to have freedom. Well it
wasn't nice!!! At least for the Indians, the Georgians were forcing the Cherokee to leave their
land or live under their laws. But, the Cherokee (one of the Indians tribes) they refused to leave
their land and live under the laws of America. The Indians/ Cherokee, did mass murdered the
U.S., but the U.S. took their land. The U.S. broken treaties between them and cheated them on
trades, they also killed many of their men, women, and children. So they're only retaliating for
what the U.S did to them. The Indian Removal Act wasn't justified because the Americans took
their land, killed their men, women, children, they have broken treaties and cheated them on
trades. First of all, the land that the U.S. owned such as Georgia or Florida, was actually the
Indian's land. Their land was either cheated in a treaty to turn over land to the Americans or was
forced to sell their land to Americans. In the article, from National Geographic it says that,
"Traditionally, Native Americans are believed to have descended from northeast Asia, arriving over
a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska some 12,000 years ago and then migrating across North
and South America." ("Who Were The First American?"). And the Cherokee was in what known as
Georgia...show more content...
The Removal Act wasn't justified just because the U.S. killed their people, cheated them on trades,
broke treaties, and took their land. They've done some equal brutality to the U.S to fight us in wars,
killed our people, e.t.c. In conclusion, the Removal Act wasn't justified because America did horrible
and gruesome thing to the Indians and even though they did the same on deserve it because we
started it, the Americans started the pain the Indians had to go
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Indian Removal Act
Upon the start of the Indian removal act, America dipped into a dark point in our history. With it's
harsh brutality and forceful nature, we see xenophobia plaque the minds of the Americans. The
removal of Native Americans from their homelands was a denial of basic human rights, it forced
natives off their land and exposed them to terrible conditions during the relocation process.
Native Americans were treated rather unfairly. Casting Native Americans out of their homes was not
only robbing them of their land, but their basic human rights as well. Many colonist refused to bond
with Native Americans out of fear, eventually they got so scared of the Natives that they called for
the "Indian Removal Act." Andrew Jackson was the man behind the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Indian Removal Act
Indian Removal (Zinn Chapter 7) Once the white men decided that they wanted lands belonging to
the Native Americans (Indians), the United States Government did everything in its power to help
the white men acquire Indian land. The US Government did everything from turning a blind eye to
passing legislature requiring the Indians to give up their land (see Indian Removal Bill of 1828).
Aided by his bias against the Indians, General Jackson set the Indian removal into effect in the war
of 1812 when he battled the great Tecumseh and conquered him. Then General, later to become
President, Jackson began the later Indian Removal movement when he conquered TecumsehВ№s
allied Indian nation and began distributing...show more content...
Georgia). The state of Georgia never released them from imprisonment and Jackson never intervened.
The government also turned a blind eye when dealing with treaties that were previously agreed to
with the Indians. In 1791 the Cherokee nation acknowledged themselves to be under the protection
of the United States and no other sovereign, also an agreement was made that white men could not
be on their lands without passports. Jackson himself offered false promises to the Indians that
they would have the lands west of the Mississippi "as long as Grass grows or water runs." These
lands were taken away barely 50 years after they were assessed. The United States government
played a cruel game when it relocated its Indian population (some could argue this as survival of
the fittest, evolution). They turned a blind and mostly bias eye when it came to Indian politics and
treaties they had made twenty years prior. They made promised that were going to be broken, and
which there were no way of avoiding. In short, the government in a way did the same thing to the
Indians that Jackson did to the Bank:
Get more content on HelpWriting.net