Libr 559 M - Final Project - Cosco, Grace, McElroy
1.
2.
3. Is a link out to a separate site from the "official site" preferable or should interactive tools be incorporated into the SLAIS site?
4.
5. The visibility and access structures may be more hierarchical and restrictive ... and have many types of users (such as faculty, staff and students in varying degree programs).
6. There may be tighter integration of back end enterprise data and service to create contents catering to the domain-specific applications. (For example, integration with an open journal system).
7. Different design and composition of social network features may be chosen to satisfy the domain requirements.
16. The aggregator has its own rss feed, making it even easier to subscribe to news from the school.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21. Thoughtful blog post by Tony Hirst about why the site was launched, intentions for its use: http://ouseful.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/ou-goes-social-with-platform/Recommendations for improving the SLAIS website Considering the literature about student participation online, and our brief survey of existing departmental and university websites, we have compiled the following recommendations for the SLAIS website. Most of the effective use of social media by LIS schools has involved external-domain sites, either social networking sites like Facebook, virtual worlds such as Second Life, and blogs hosted elsewhere on the university website. Sticking with this trend, SLAIS could incorporate some relatively simple tools, including: Establishing a hashtag (e.g. #SLAIS) and aggregating Tweets using the tag to display on the homepage. Including links to student and faculty blogs. Creating an official SLAIS facebook page -- there is currently a group called,
SLAIS: It's Alright
created by students. Providing RSS feeds for student or faculty blogs, news updates, or other site updates. Permitting comments, for example on the news section. Adding a protected section of the site to include a student directory. Recognizing possible administrative limitations to the website, alternatives include adding these tools to the LASSA website http://www.slais.ubc.ca/PEOPLE/students/student-groups/lassa/index.htm. (The site already incorporates feeds from Twitter and Students could also create independent tools such as Twitter lists (http://twitter.com/#/list/kellymce/slais) or a Ning network (http://www.ning.com/). However, although these initiatives could encourage participation, collaboration, and community-building, their long term sustainability would be greatly improved with support from the department administration. That is, students come and go, while staff and faculty stick around longer. Alternatively, an additional website could be established, like the Open University Platform site or the
Department 2.0
site at Utah State. This kind of initiative could be incorporated into a course or a student directed study. Because there may be limitations to what can be used on the website due to university policy, launching an independent site offers some flexibility. However, it also requires a great deal of effort both to create and to maintain. A content management tool such as Doug Holton's Department 2.0 could be a great choice -- nonetheless, it would need to be customized for SLAIS. Buy-in from students, faculty, and staff would be mandatory for such a site to succeed. Trying out some of the easier, external-domain tools, could demonstrate to the administration that students will take advantage of social networking, paving the way for more extensive and innovative tools. Conclusion This project has been the impetus for us to research the benefits associated with incorporating social media in the redesign of the SLAIS website. Our survey of websites demonstrates that some information schools are already incorporating social tools to enhance their sites. The literature shows the student demographic contains active users of social media, outside of the educational context, and that domain-specific social networking is an under-utilized approach in education. Incorporating social media into a departmental website has the potential to foster the development of an academic community, enable students to network with alumni and prospective employers, assist students in developing a professional online identity and market the school by showcasing student projects and thoughtful discussion of current issues. As evidenced by the success of the capstone project cited in the literature review, the abilities of SLAIS students could be further demonstrated if they were involved in the creation and design of a departmental social network within a Directed Study or Directed Research project. Such a project could give students valuable experience with content management systems and managing social networks – skills that are both increasingly useful in the information professions. References and Further Reading Alexander, B. (2008). Social Networking in Higher Education. The Tower and the Cloud. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB7202s.pdf Bocchi, J., Eastman, J. and Owens Swift, C.(2004)Retaining the Online Learner: Profile of Students in an Online MBA Program and Implications for Teaching Them. Journal of Education for Business Vol. 79(4), p.245- boyd, danah. 2007.
Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace .
Apophenia Blog Essay. June 24 . http://www.danah.org/papers/essays/ClassDivisions.html Coiro, J. & Fogleman, J. (2009). A Conceptual Analysis of How Multimodal Content-Area Websites Align with Emerging Theories of New Literacies and Technology Use in Classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Deng, L. and Yuen, A.H.K. (2007). Connecting adult learners with an online community: challenges and opportunities. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. Vol 2(3): p. 192-212. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. and Hughes, E. (2009). Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age: Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now?. Educational Researcher. 2009; 38; 246 Haythornthwaite, C. (2005),
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects.
Information. Communication. & Society. Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 125-147. Holton, D.L. (2009) Blended learning with Drupal. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 52. Retrieved from http://jjolt.merlot.org/vol5no2/holton_0609.htm Glahn, C., Specht, M. & Kepler, R. (2009) Visualization of interaction footprints for engagement in online communities. Journal of Edcuational Technology & Society. Vol 12(3), p.44-57. Liu, S. (2008)Engaging users: the future of academic library websites. College & Research Libraries. Vol. 69(1), p. 6-27. Mandernach, J. (2009) Three ways to imporve student engagement in the online classroom. Online Classroom. March 2009, p.1-2. Mupinga, D., Nora, R & Yaw, D. (2006)The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching. Vol. 54(1), p.185-189. New Media Consortium. (2008). The horizon report. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved September 24, 2008, from www.nmc.org/pdf/2008-Horizon-Report.pdf Shirky, C. (2008). Gin, Television, and Social Surplus. http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html Sterling, R. (2008, April 29). Writing, technology, and teenagers. Kojo Nnamdi Show. Retrieved from the WAMU Public Radio Web site: http://wamu.org/programs/kn/08/04/29.php Wesch, M. The Future of Education. University of Manitoba. Retrieved from http://umanitoba.ca/ist/production/streaming/podcast_wesch.html Wong, H. (2009) Engage Online Learners with Technology. Online Classroom. March 2009, p.7-8. Yue, K-B. & DeSilva,D. et.al. (2009) Building Real World Domain-Specific Social Network Websites on a Capstone Project. Journal fo Information Systems Education. Vol 20(1) p. 67- Student feedback from the focus group Topic: SLAIS website redesign - what do you want to see on it? Content-wise, front page especially (emphasis is for LIBR559M project) Major Observations/Findings, Challenges/Issues discovered, Stakeholders – discussion leading Layout: L: get rid of long menu on right-hand side of front page -- too much info (K and E concur) K: for an info studies program, our webpage sucks E: changing the font (our own font) L: listserv is stacking like the mid-90s K: need to develop a better aesthetic L: UBC common look and feel problem K: that's fine, but all the other stuff can be changed maybe R: how far can they go within that style, though? K: Sauder school of business has a great webpage, though! R: MIT barely has a common feel in theirs E: Sauder - great webpage, all the important stuff is in a menu on the top of the page - we need to do that too, rather than all that stuff on the right side of the page K: this is not transparent to our listserv, or our courses E: info about LASSA hard to find (the student union does not look connected to the school) E: what is SLAIS is right at the bottom L: and that section is too text-heavy. L: U of A not much better. Dynamic – the website is too static. Never changes L: wasting space with the big image in the middle - doesn't say anything about the school, students shouldn't choose the school based on the view K: maybe change picture to a couple different photos, showing events (create a platform for students to contribute images?) L: not dynamic enough Interaction , Participation – allow students to contribute to the website and to the school – communicate with each other: E: more interactive, social media integrated like other schools maybe, blog for student communication, One page for students so everything is there -- we don't know where things are E: U of T ischool, events right on the front page -- our school depends too much on email L: too static, not interactive-only interactive thing is important is importing th google calendar - should allow me to important my course timetable, let me build my portfolio, be a portal for submitting my work E: at SFU we had our own server for us to storage stuff rather than doing ftp, which is really hard to work with L: should be able to mould this site to my needs, which I can't L: for LWB, we're responsible ourselves for putting up our stuff E: would be nice to have a link to that, though R: You want movement, what can we do to have students feel like they can contribute? L: make it a course, make it a contest J: Susie was talking about people creating and maintaining index for SLAIS site... People would be willing to do this! Both creating and maintaining, people could volunteer to maintain for a year R: Barber is getting students to submit photos of UBC and putting them up on monitors in the centre. What specific things can we try to promote? L: student showcase of work, showcase of extracurriculars (ACRL, etc. - we should have been blogging from there!) E: if I go to a conference for w2, i have someone blogging, twittering, and posting photos on the site. If we had that [for ACRL], we're all on twitter, I would know about that! L: two things in the paper this morning that i thoguht students would find interesting Engagement – this may foster a sense of engagement with the school and give students opportunities: K: none of the stuff they're teaching us is implemented on the website. E: let students be able to post content, videos, etc. Problem of moderation, but it would be good for students to be able to have a voice and be able to interact with other people. We're content creators, we should be creating content, and we're not. We should be using the tools we're being taught about and putting that in there, or at least linking to it. E: we can build our own content! And learn how to do it! E: more interactive and engaging E: just more engaging, we have a greater role now as content creators E: i don't feel engaged, and this stuff does contribute to that K: yeah, and some people don't want to be here because they don't feel engaged New systems – library 2.0 systems: twitter, blog, rss (job postings): D: Use CSS! K: no link to job blog L: no rss feed for blog L: it is there! Just buried. For LWB, our URL is crazy long and it can't be crawled - search engine is only going to go so deep, site won't be found by Google, unfindable by those who don't know exactly where to go R: could provide different domains, or put LWB meta tags in SLAIS website L: Even a ticker would be great! K: we could post things on there. If slais had a twitter feed... L: even if it was just
hey, check this out...
L: web 2.0 Challenging, boundaries – the website will need to address challenges in the information world. Transparency, publication, censorship, etc: L: probbaly a myriad of UBC policies on what we can put on the site, but if that is the case, WE should be the ones butting up against this and teaching people about open access and (stuff) K: we should be pioneering this L: this would be a perfect example of needing to let go when there's a paradigm shift