Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
MIMIC Mantra <ul><li>Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause (Structural Equation Modeling)  </li></ul>
Introduction of MIMIC model <ul><li>“ Conventional wisdom” in psychological wisdom is that a latent variable is the cause ...
Advantage <ul><li>Measuring latent variables that are whether unobservable or not properly measured. </li></ul><ul><li>Est...
Latent Variable <ul><li>In statistics latent variables are variables that are not directly observed but rather inferred fr...
Model <ul><li>MIMIC model consist of two parts   </li></ul><ul><li>Structural part :  The structural part shows how the la...
<ul><li>If we combine the two equations: </li></ul><ul><li>Y =  β (  α x + u) + v  </li></ul><ul><li>=  π x + e  </li></ul...
Path Analysis <ul><li>As this model characterizes a casual relationship between latent variable and set of variables we ca...
Path Diagram <ul><li>Casual links among variables are represented by unidirectional arrows. Their direction  implies relat...
Case Study <ul><li>Example :  Social status and social participation in a sample of 530 women was  studied. It was assume ...
Final equations <ul><li>Structural equation: </li></ul><ul><li>Spart = 0.11*income + 0.045*occup + 0.16*edu , Errorvar  = ...
Path Analysis income occupation education church attendance member friends social participation 0.11 0.045 0.16 1.58 0.86 ...
Conclusion <ul><li>Thus one percent increase in  income  implies an estimated increase in  social participation  by about ...
Popular software for MIMIC modeling <ul><li>LISREL </li></ul><ul><li>AMOS </li></ul><ul><li>EQS </li></ul><ul><li>SAS/SPSS...
<ul><li>Thanks for your time </li></ul>
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Mimic Mantra

1,101 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Mimic Mantra

  1. 1. MIMIC Mantra <ul><li>Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause (Structural Equation Modeling) </li></ul>
  2. 2. Introduction of MIMIC model <ul><li>“ Conventional wisdom” in psychological wisdom is that a latent variable is the cause of the measured variable </li></ul><ul><li>MIMIC model was first described by Swedish statistician Dr. Joreskog and A.S Goldberger in 1975. </li></ul><ul><li>This Modeling technique belongs to Structural Equation Modeling family. </li></ul><ul><li>MIMIC modeling is all about study of latent variables. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Advantage <ul><li>Measuring latent variables that are whether unobservable or not properly measured. </li></ul><ul><li>Estimation of casual link based on theoretical hypothesis. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Latent Variable <ul><li>In statistics latent variables are variables that are not directly observed but rather inferred from other variables and directly measured. </li></ul><ul><li>Latent variables can be identified by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis etc. </li></ul>X1 Y1 L Latent variable X2 Y2 Casual link
  5. 5. Model <ul><li>MIMIC model consist of two parts </li></ul><ul><li>Structural part : The structural part shows how the latent variables are estimated through the observed variable </li></ul><ul><li>Measurement Part: The measurement part displays the casual link among the latent variables and observed causes. </li></ul><ul><li>Structural part </li></ul><ul><li>L = α 1x1 + α 2x2 + α 3x3 ………+ α kxk + u </li></ul><ul><li>(where L= latent variable, α = set of structural coefficient, x = set of obs. Variables, u = set of error) </li></ul><ul><li>Measurement part </li></ul><ul><li>y1 = β 1L + v1 </li></ul><ul><li>y2 = β 2L + v2 </li></ul><ul><li>| </li></ul><ul><li>| </li></ul><ul><li>| </li></ul><ul><li>yp = β pL + vp (where L= latent variable, β = set of measurement coefficient, y = set of obs. causes, v = set of error) </li></ul>
  6. 6. <ul><li>If we combine the two equations: </li></ul><ul><li>Y = β ( α x + u) + v </li></ul><ul><li>= π x + e </li></ul><ul><li>Say π = β α , e = β u + v , </li></ul><ul><li>And has covariance matrix : Ω = E(ee’)= E[( β u + v ) [( β u + v )] </li></ul><ul><li>= σ ²( β β ’) + Θ ² </li></ul><ul><li>Final equation: </li></ul><ul><li>Y = π x + e </li></ul>
  7. 7. Path Analysis <ul><li>As this model characterizes a casual relationship between latent variable and set of variables we can also identify the model with graphical form of representation using path analysis. </li></ul><ul><li>A path analysis is a pictorial representation of a system of simultaneous equation. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Path Diagram <ul><li>Casual links among variables are represented by unidirectional arrows. Their direction implies relationship from independent to dependent variable. The strength of these links are shown by the regression coefficients. </li></ul><ul><li>Simple associations among variables are represented by curve lines, the strength of these links are defined by correlation coefficients. </li></ul>x1 ..... ..... xk y1 yp L α 1 α k ...... β 1 β p ...... Casual link Simple association
  9. 9. Case Study <ul><li>Example : Social status and social participation in a sample of 530 women was studied. It was assume that income , occupation and education explain social participation. Social participation was measured by church attendance , membership and friends seen . </li></ul><ul><li>Say spart = social participation </li></ul><ul><li>cattn = church attendance </li></ul><ul><li>memb = membership </li></ul><ul><li>friends = friends seen </li></ul><ul><li>Correlation matrix : income occup edu cattn memb friends </li></ul><ul><li>income 1.00 </li></ul><ul><li>occup 0.304 1.00 </li></ul><ul><li>edu 0.305 0.344 1.00 </li></ul><ul><li>cattn 0.10 0.156 0.158 1.00 </li></ul><ul><li>Memb 0.284 0.192 0.324 0.360 1.00 </li></ul><ul><li>friends 0.176 0.136 0.226 0.210 0.265 1.00 </li></ul>
  10. 10. Final equations <ul><li>Structural equation: </li></ul><ul><li>Spart = 0.11*income + 0.045*occup + 0.16*edu , Errorvar = 0.16 , R = 0.26 </li></ul><ul><li>(S.E) (0.028) (0.026) (0.031) (0.037) </li></ul><ul><li>t-value 3.82 1.73 4.93 4.35 </li></ul><ul><li>Measurement Equation: </li></ul><ul><li>Cattn = 1.00 * spart , Errorvar = 0.78, R = 0.22 </li></ul><ul><li>(0.058) </li></ul><ul><li>13.61 </li></ul><ul><li>memb = 1.58 * spart , Errorvar = 0.46, R = 0.54 </li></ul><ul><li>(0.24) (0.075) </li></ul><ul><li>6.71 6.10 </li></ul><ul><li>friends = 0.86 * spart , Errorvar = 0.46, R = 0.54 </li></ul><ul><li>(0.14) (0.058) </li></ul><ul><li>6.03 14.51 </li></ul>
  11. 11. Path Analysis income occupation education church attendance member friends social participation 0.11 0.045 0.16 1.58 0.86 1.00 0.304 0.344 0.305
  12. 12. Conclusion <ul><li>Thus one percent increase in income implies an estimated increase in social participation by about 0.11 percent. Similarly 1.58 percent increase in membership is measured by one percent increase in social participation. </li></ul>
  13. 13. Popular software for MIMIC modeling <ul><li>LISREL </li></ul><ul><li>AMOS </li></ul><ul><li>EQS </li></ul><ul><li>SAS/SPSS </li></ul>
  14. 14. <ul><li>Thanks for your time </li></ul>

×