Part 1: V i ew a feature f ilm made between 1970 - 2000 you h a ve not seen before (or w i ll see later in this cl a s s) by a great directo r or featuring a great actor or actress. Just as you did in the first paper, c omment on the specific film you sa w . Pay p a rticular attention to the screenplay, camerawork (cinematography) the editing (montage) and the sound (this can include the music). You may also address special effects. Again, as you did in the first paper, talk about w hat you like, and what you dislike, about what you saw? Why do y o u like the things you like, and w h y do you disli k e the things you dislike? Is the film a good film, or is it n ot? Part 2: N ow that you h a ve commented on the specific film you vie w ed, see if you can draw some g eneral conclusions about the w ork of t h e director and one of the main actors or actresses. Be sure to comment on the overall impressi o n you had of the fil m , includinghow you see it as an example o f the genre and time period. Rem e mbe r , this is not a research pape r . I am interested in what you have to sa y , not in w hat you can learn by reading up on the film or the filmmake r . Part 3: Go back to the "My C riteria for Quality in Film" page. Based on your vie w ing of this week's film, add Five new general conclusi o ns. Th e s e statements should be number e d (6) through (10) . Be sure to include entire page, including all of your previous criteria statements. .

1. Part 1: V
i
ew
a
feature
f
ilm made between 1970 - 2000
you
h
a
ve not
seen
before
(or
w
i
ll
see
later
in
this

2. cl
a
s
s)
by
a
great
directo
r or featuring a great actor or actress.
Just as you did in the first paper, c
omment
on
the
specific
film
you
sa
w
.
Pay
p
a
rticular

3. attention
to
the
screenplay,
camerawork
(cinematography)
the
editing
(montage) and the sound (this can include the music). You may
also address special effects.
Again, as you did in the first paper, talk about w
hat
you
like,
and
what
you
dislike,
about

4. what
you
saw?
Why
do
y
o
u
like
the things
you
like,
and
w
h
y
do
you
disli
k
e

5. the
things
you
dislike?
Is
the
film
a
good
film,
or
is
it
n
ot?
Part
2:
N
ow

6. that
you
h
a
ve
commented
on
the
specific
film
you
vie
w
ed,
see
if
you
can
draw
some

7. g
eneral conclusions
about
the
w
ork
of
t
h
e
director
and
one
of
the
main
actors
or
actresses.
Be

8. sure
to comment
on
the
overall
impressi
o
n
you
had
of
the
fil
m
,
includinghow
you
see
it
as

9. an
example
o
f
the
genre and time period.
Rem
e
mbe
r
,
this
is
not
a
research
pape
r
.
I
am interested
in

10. what
you
have
to
sa
y
,
not
in
w
hat
you
can
learn
by
reading
up
on
the

11. film
or
the
filmmake
r
.
Part
3:
Go back to the
"My
C
riteria
for
Quality
in
Film"
page.
Based
on
your

12. vie
w
ing
of
this
week's
film, add
Five new
general
conclusi
o
ns.
Th
e
s
e
statements
should
be
number
e
d

13. (6)
through (10)
.
Be
sure
to
include
entire page,
including
all
of
your
previous
criteria statements.