The document outlines the criteria and scoring rubric for a presentation on an assigned healthcare technology. It provides guidelines in multiple areas, including introducing the technology, discussing its history and use, impact on healthcare and nursing, advantages and disadvantages, challenges and regulatory implications, concluding with a summary and evaluation of team performance. Topics are scored on a scale of outstanding to unsatisfactory based on thoroughly addressing the specified criteria.

1. RUA Technology Presentation (NR360)
RUA Technology Presentation (NR360)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduce Technology
& Team*Title slide identifies the assigned technology and
introduces team members *Provides an introduction *Describes
the technology *States purpose(s) for the technology in
healthcare. *Establishes the professional tone for the
presentation.
20.0
to >18.0
ptsOutstanding
All criteria met and thoroughly explicated.
18.0
to >16.0
ptsVery Good
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
16.0
to >15.0
ptsSatisfactory

2. One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
15.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Three (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistory and
Current Use*Describes significant findings that prompted the
development of the technology *Discusses the history and
current use of the technology in healthcare *Describes three
goals of this technology’s implementation.
30.0
to >27.0
ptsOutstanding
All criteria met and thoroughly explicated.
27.0
to >25.0
ptsVery Good
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately

3. presented.
25.0
to >22.0
ptsSatisfactory
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
22.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Three (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact on
Healthcare and Nursing*Impact on professional nursing
practice. *Patient safety impact (including statistical
justification) *Impact on patient care delivery, quality care
measures/monitoring, and risk management (privacy,
confidentiality, and security) as applicable. *Ethical & legal
considerations. *Infrastructure/ operational consequences (e.g.,
budget, costs, etc.) *Impact on a population and/or geographic
region *Provide examples & statically significant data to
support examples.
40.0
to >36.0

4. ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly describes and accomplishes each criteria.
36.0
to >33.0
ptsVery Good
Describes/accomplishes each criteria.
33.0
to >30.0
ptsSatisfactory
Describes/accomplishes each of the criteria except for one (or
more) component.
30.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Describes/accomplishes each of the criteria except for two (or
more) component.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThree Advantages
and Disadvantages*Patient’s
vantage
point or perspective (e.g., patient outcomes, safety,

5. patient/family satisfaction). *Nurse’s vantage point
(improves/hinders job efficiency/safety) *Healthcare
organization’s vantage point (regulatory compliance, financial,
etc.).
40.0
to >36.0
ptsOutstanding
Describes all criteria thoroughly.
36.0
to >33.0
ptsVery Good
Does not adequately describe one of the criteria thoroughly.
33.0
to >30.0
ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately describe two of the criteria thoroughly.
30.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory

6. Does not adequately describe any of the criteria thoroughly.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControversy/
Issues/ Challenges/ Regulatory ImplicationsHow might issues
surrounding the chosen technology be addressed/solved?
*Provide statically significant data or evidence to support your
findings.
30.0
to >27.0
ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly describes each element.
27.0
to >25.0
ptsVery Good
Adequately describes each element.
25.0
to >22.0
ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately describe at least one element.
22.0

7. to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately describe at least two elements.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary*Key
points *Discoveries/surprises *Lessons learned by the team
20.0
to >18.0
ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly summarizes all elements.
18.0
to >16.0
ptsVery Good
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
16.0
to >15.0
ptsSatisfactory
One (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.

8. 15.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Three (or more) of the criteria are not met or are inadequately
presented.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Project
Evaluation*Place & discuss the following questions and
responses in the slides(s) following the summary slide and prior
to the reference slide(s). *How did the team function well?
(e.g., team strengths, team balance, etc.) *What problems did
you have interacting as a team? (e.g., team weaknesses, outside
challenges, technology, etc.) *What specific actions would you
recommend to future teams to help them interact, function, and
collaborate successfully?
40.0
to >36.0
ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly meets all criteria.
36.0
to >33.0
ptsVery Good

9. Adequately summarizes all elements.
33.0
to >30.0
ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately summarizes one element.
30.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately summarizes two or more elements.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation,
Scholarly Writing, & APA Format*25‐30 PowerPoint slides
*Submitted to Dropbox/ Turnitin by Team leader only *Speaker
Notes *Scholarly writing and APA guidelines *Citations &
references *Spelling, grammar, and punctuation *Copyright and
plagiarism rules.
20.0
to >18.0
ptsOutstanding
Thoroughly accomplishes all guidelines.
18.0

10. to >16.0
ptsVery Good
Adequately accomplishes all guidelines.
16.0
to >15.0
ptsSatisfactory
Does not adequately accomplish one or more of the guidelines.
15.0
to >0
ptsUnsatisfactory
Does not adequately accomplish two or more of the guidelines.
20.0 pts
Total Points: 240.0
Previous
Next
Top