SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Download to read offline
C O M P R E H E N S I V E H O U S I N G M A R K E T A N A L Y S I S
Montgomery-Frederick, Maryland
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research As of January 1, 2016
Frederick
Montgomery
Maryland
Virginia
Pennsylvania
W
estVirginia
District of
Columbia
Carroll
Loudoun
Washington
Howard
Fairfax
AdamsFranklin York
Prince
George’s
Jefferson
Arlington
Housing Market Area
The Montgomery-Frederick Housing
Market Area (HMA), which is cotermi-
nous with the Silver Spring-Frederick-
Rockville, MD Metropolitan Division
within the Washington-Arlington-­
Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropol-
itan Statistical Area (MSA), comprises
Montgomery and Frederick Counties in
Maryland. This report examines each
county as a separate submarket. An
established biotechnology industry is
a particular economic strength for the
HMA, which boasts a highly educated
workforce and high household incomes
relative to national averages.
Summary
Economy
Nonfarm payrolls in the Montgomery-
Frederick HMA increased an average
of 1.0 percent annually during the
past 5 years, culminating in a gain of
8,300 jobs, or 1.4 percent, during 2015.
Nearly every sector of the economy
added jobs during 2015, with significant
con­tributions from the scientific research,
healthcare services, and food services
industries. During the next 3 years,
nonfarm payrolls are expected to
increase annually by an average of
6,450 jobs, or 1.1 percent.
Sales Market
The sales housing market in the
Montgomery-Frederick HMA is slightly
tight. An increase in sales of existing
homes and limited homebuilding
activity have contributed to a
tightening of the sales market since
2010. During the 3-year forecast period,
demand is expected for 8,675 new
homes (Table 1). The 970 single-family
homes under construction and a portion
of the 11,700 other vacant units that
may reenter the sales market will satisfy
some of the forecast demand.
Rental Market
The rental housing market in the
Montgomery-Frederick HMA is
balanced, with a vacancy rate of 5.2
percent. Conditions are softer in areas
of concentrated apartment construction
activity, including the Reis, Inc.-defined
Bethesda/Chevy Chase, Rockville, and
Frederick County market areas. Demand
is estimated for 7,250 new market-rate
rental units in the HMA (Table 1). The
2,575 apartments under construction
will meet some of the demand.
Table 1.	Housing Demand in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA During the
Forecast Period
Montgomery-Frederick
HMA
Montgomery County
Submarket
Frederick County
Submarket
Sales
Units
Rental
Units
Sales
Units
Rental
Units
Sales
Units
Rental
Units
Total demand 8,675 7,250 5,900 6,500 2,775 750
Under construction 970 2,575 570 2,225 400 350
Notes: Total demand represents estimated production necessary to achieve a balanced
market at the end of the forecast period. Units under construction as of January 1, 2016.
A portion of the estimated 11,700 other vacant units in the HMA will likely satisfy some
of the forecast demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019.
Source: Estimates by analyst
Market Details
Economic Conditions................2
Population and Households......6
Housing Market Trends.............8
Data Profiles............................17
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
2
Economic Conditions
Economic strengths of the
Montgomery-Frederick HMA
include an established biotechnology
industry and an emerging cybertech-
nology industry. These industries are
supported by a number of federal
government agencies, private manu­
facturing and research firms, and a
highly educated workforce. Approxi-
mately 55 percent of the population
ages 25 years and older has obtained
a bachelor’s, graduate, or professional
degree compared with only 30 percent
nationally (2014 American Commu-
nity Survey [ACS] 1-year data).
The economy of the HMA has added
payrolls during 12 of the past 15 years,
mostly because of growth in service-
providing sectors. Among all sectors
in the HMA, the greatest percentage
gain in jobs from 2000 through 2015
was in the education and health
services sector (Figure 1). From 2001
through 2007, payrolls in the HMA
increased by an average of 4,300 jobs,
or 0.8 percent, annually, and the larg-
est gains were in the education and
health services and the professional
and business services sectors. After
the onset of the national recession in
December 2007, nonfarm payrolls in
the HMA declined by an average of
5,700 jobs, or 1.0 percent, annually
from 2008 through 2010. Job losses in
most sectors of the economy during
this period more than offset gains
in the education and health services
sector and the federal government
subsector. From 2011 through 2014,
nonfarm payrolls increased by an
average of 4,700 jobs, or 0.8 percent,
annually. The sectors that contributed
most to gains from 2011 through
2014 were the education and health
services and the leisure and hospital-
ity sectors. Holy Cross Germantown
Hospital opened in the Montgomery
County submarket in October 2014,
adding approximately 600 jobs to the
education and health services sector.
Payroll growth accelerated to 1.4
percent in 2015 with the addition of
8,300 jobs (Table 2), the most jobs
added year over year since 2005.
Figure 1. Sector Growth in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA, Percentage Change, 2000 to Current
Notes: Current is based on 12-month averages through December 2015. During this period, payrolls in the financial activities sector
showed no net change.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Total nonfarm payroll jobs
Goods-producing sectors
Mining, logging, & construction
Manufacturing
Service-providing sectors
Information
Financial activities
Professional & business services
Education & health services
Government
Other services
Leisure & hospitality
Transportation & utilities
Wholesale & retail trade
– 30 20– 20 10– 10 0– 40 5030 40
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
3
Table 2. 12-Month Average Nonfarm Payroll Jobs in the Montgomery-
Frederick HMA, by Sector
12 Months Ending
Absolute
Change
Percent
ChangeDecember
2014
December
2015
Total nonfarm payroll jobs 577,600 585,900 8,300 1.4
Goods-producing sectors 49,700 50,600 900 1.8
Mining, logging, & construction 33,200 33,700 500 1.5
Manufacturing 16,500 17,000 500 3.0
Service-providing sectors 527,900 535,300 7,400 1.4
Wholesale & retail trade 71,500 71,700 200 0.3
Transportation & utilities 5,900 6,000 100 1.7
Information 14,400 14,200 – 200 – 1.4
Financial activities 38,700 38,900 200 0.5
Professional & business services 123,400 125,000 1,600 1.3
Education & health services 83,500 86,300 2,800 3.4
Leisure & hospitality 52,300 53,800 1,500 2.9
Other services 31,800 31,900 100 0.3
Government 106,400 107,400 1,000 0.9
Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Based on 12-month
averages through December 2014 and December 2015.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
The education and health services
sector led job growth, increasing by
2,800 jobs, or 3.4 percent. Holy Cross
Health, one of the largest healthcare
employers in the HMA, completed
the construction of a 232,000-square-
foot patient tower in Silver Spring, in
the Montgomery County submarket,
in November 2015. The leisure and
hospitality sector gained 1,500 jobs,
or 2.9 percent, including an increase
of 1,200 jobs, or 3.1 percent, in the
food services and drinking places
industry. The new 140-room Cambria
hotel & suites in the city of Rockville,
in the Montgomery County submar-
ket, also added jobs to the leisure and
hospitality sector. The hotel is part of
a $130 million mixed-use development
that also includes the recently com-
pleted 263-unit The Upton apartment
community and 16,000 square feet of
retail space.
The professional and business services
sector is the largest in the HMA, with
21 percent of total nonfarm payroll
jobs (Figure 2). In 2015, the sector
added 1,600 jobs, an increase of 1.3
percent, including a gain of 1,400 jobs,
or 8.8 percent, in the scientific research
and development services industry.
The HMA is home to about 330
bio­­technology firms, including Glaxo­
SmithKline plc and MedImmune, Inc.
(Maryland Department of Commerce).
GlaxoSmithKline established a vaccine
research center in Rockville in late
2015, adding approximately 600 jobs
to the professional and business ser­vices
sector. Other expansions anticipated to
add jobs to this sector include those at
the National Cybersecurity Center of
Excellence, which is currently under
construction in the Montgomery
County submarket and expected to
add 20 jobs on completion in early
Figure 2.	Current Nonfarm Payroll Jobs in the Montgomery-Frederick
HMA, by Sector
Note: Based on 12-month averages through December 2015.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Economic Conditions Continued
Government 18.3%
Leisure & hospitality 9.2%
Other services 5.5%
Education & health services 14.7% Professional & business services 21.3%
Wholesale & retail trade 12.2%
Manufacturing 2.9%
Mining, logging, & construction 5.7%
Information 2.4%
Transportation & utilities 1.0%
Financial activities 6.6%
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
4
2016, and at VariQ Corporation, a
cybersecurity services firm in the
Montgomery County submarket that
plans to add 250 employees through
2020.
The government sector, which accounts
for approximately 18 percent of total
nonfarm payrolls, is the second larg-
est sector in the HMA. The National
Institutes of Health and the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration are major
employers in the federal government
subsector and are the two largest
employers in the HMA, with 17,300
and 13,130 employees, respectively
(Table 3). From 2007 through 2012,
the federal government subsector
increased by an average of 1,400 jobs,
or 2.9 percent, annually. Across-the-
board federal spending cuts mandated
by the Budget Control Act of 2011
(also known as sequestration) led to
declines of 400 jobs, or 0.7 percent,
annually in the federal government
subsector during 2013 and 2014. The
budget agreement signed in 2015 con­
tributed to a gain of 600 jobs, or 1.4
percent, in federal government payrolls
in the HMA during the past year.
The financial activities sector repre-
sents less than 7 percent of nonfarm
payroll jobs in the HMA but is one of
the highest-paying sectors. Employers
in the sector paid average weekly
wages of $1,745 and $1,335 in the
Montgomery County and Frederick
County submarkets, respectively, as of
the third quarter of 2015, ranking as
the second highest wage by sector in
the Montgomery County submarket
and the highest wage by sector in the
Frederick County submarket. From
2001 through 2007, the financial
activities sector added an average of
800 jobs, an increase of 2.0 percent,
annually. The sector subsequently
declined by 1,200 jobs, or 2.7 percent,
annually from 2008 through 2010
because of the national recession. The
sector continued to lose jobs from
2011 through 2014 because of losses
in the finance and insurance industry,
including layoffs of approximately 70
employees at RoundPoint Mortgage
Servicing Corporation in the Mont-
gomery County submarket in late
2014. Jobs in the financial activities
sector increased during 2015, however,
by 200 jobs. An expanding apartment
inventory in the HMA led, in part, to
a gain of 300 jobs, or 2.4 percent, in
the real estate and rental and leasing
industry that more than offset a decline
of 100 jobs in the finance and insur-
ance industry.
The manufacturing sector is also among
the highest-paying sectors in the
HMA. With average weekly wages
of $1,947 and $1,072, manufacturing
is the highest-paying sector in the
Montgomery County submarket and
the fourth highest-paying sector in the
Frederick County submarket. Manu­
facturing jobs declined 41.5 percent
overall from 2001 through 2013 but
increased by an average of 400 jobs,
or 2.8 percent, annually during 2014
and 2015. MedImmune, a pharmaceu-
tical research and development firm
with approximately 2,900 employees
Table 3.	Major Employers in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA
Name of Employer Nonfarm Payroll Sector
Number of
Employees
National Institutes of Health Government 17,300
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Government 13,130
Naval Support Activity Bethesda Government 11,690
Fort Detrick Government 6,400
Marriott International Leisure & hospitality 5,500
Lockheed Martin Corporation Manufacturing 4,690
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Government 4,600
Adventist Healthcare Education & health services 4,290
Holy Cross Hospital Education & health services 3,900
Giant Food Stores, LLC Wholesale & retail trade 3,150
Notes: Excludes local school districts. Data include military personnel, who are
generally not included in nonfarm payroll survey data.
Source: Maryland Department of Commerce
Economic Conditions Continued
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
5
in the HMA, added 160 employees
at its manufacturing facility in the
Frederick County submarket during
2014. In addition, MedImmune is
investing $200 million to expand the
facility, which is expected to add 300
jobs to the manufacturing sector by
the time it is complete in 2017.
The wholesale and retail trade sector
increased by 200 jobs, or 0.3 percent,
during 2015. The increase included
the addition of 300 jobs, an increase
of 0.5 percent, in the retail trade sub­­
sector and the loss of 100 jobs, or 0.7
percent, in the wholesale trade subsec­
tor. The opening in December 2015 of
a new Safeway Inc. grocery store in
Rockville added 150 jobs to the retail
trade subsector. The construction of
Clarksburg Premium Outlets began in
the Montgomery County submarket
in September 2015 and is anticipated
to add 800 jobs to the wholesale and
retail trade sector when it opens in
October 2016.
The unemployment rate in the HMA
declined for the past 5 years because
gains in resident employment outpaced
growth in the labor force (Figure 3).
Resident employment has increased
each year since 2010, 1 year before
the recovery in nonfarm payroll jobs
began in the HMA, mostly because
of the proximity of the HMA to the
District of Columbia. The percentages
of residents who commute to jobs
in the District of Columbia are 15
percent for the HMA as a whole and
33 percent for Bethesda and Silver
Spring, which directly border the
national capital (U.S. Census Bureau).
Because of economic expansion in the
District of Columbia since 2010 and
job growth in the HMA since 2011,
the unemployment rate declined from
a peak of 5.9 percent during 2010 to
4.1 percent during 2015. The average
during 2015 was 1 percentage point
higher than the average of 3.1 percent
during the previous expansion period
from 2001 through 2007.
During the 3-year forecast period, non­
farm payrolls are expected to increase
by 6,450 jobs, or 1.1 percent, annually.
The professional and business services,
education and health services, and
wholesale and retail trade sectors are
expected to lead job growth. The unem­
ployment rate is expected to return to
the low levels of the early-to-mid 2000s.
Two significant projects in planning
are expected to add jobs to the min-
ing, logging, and construction sector.
The construction of the $3.3 billion
commuter rail line, known as the
Purple Line, connecting Bethesda and
Silver Spring with Prince George’s
County to the east is expected to begin
in late 2016. It is estimated that the
project will create thousands of jobs
related to the design and construction
of the line and add 420 jobs to the
transportation and utilities sector when
it is operational in 2022. In addition,
The Universities at Shady Grove
expects to begin construction in July
2016 on a $162 million biomedical
sciences and engineering facility, with
completion expected in 2018.
Figure 3. Trends in Labor Force, Resident Employment, and Unem-
ployment Rate in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA, 2000
Through 2015
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Economic Conditions Continued
Unemploymentrate
Laborforceand
residentemployment
720,000
670,000
620,000
570,000
520,000
2000
2002
2004
Labor force	 Resident employment	 Unemployment rate
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
2006
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2010
2008
2012
2013
2015
2014
2011
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
6
Population and Households
As of January 1, 2016, the
population of the Montgomery-
Frederick HMA is an estimated 1.29
million. From 2010 through the
current date, population growth
aver­aged 14,750 people, or 1.2 percent,
annually (Figure 4). From 2000 to
2007, a period of economic expansion
in the HMA, population growth aver-
aged 12,500, or 1.1 percent, annually
(U.S. Census Bureau decennial census
counts and population estimates as of
July 1). During this time, growth
peaked at 1.9 percent from 2000 to
2001 but slowed to an average of 0.7
percent annually from 2005 to 2007,
in part because rapidly increasing
home prices deterred in-migration.
From 2007 to 2010, population
growth averaged 16,750, or 1.4 percent,
annually. Growth was relatively
strong during this period because of
job gains in the District of Columbia,
which, along with North Dakota and
Alaska, was one of the few areas in
the nation that added jobs overall
from 2008 through 2010. During the
3-year forecast period, population
growth is expected to average 14,650
people, or 1.1 percent, annually.
Since 2010, net in-migration has aver-
aged 6,300 people annually, account-
ing for approximately 43 percent of
population growth (Figure 5). From
2000 through 2007, net in-migration
was relatively low, at an average of
2,825 people annually and only 23
percent of population growth. The
rapid increase in home sales prices
during the period contributed to the
low level of net in-migration. In the
Montgomery County submarket,
where price increases were the great­est,
net in-migration averaged 5,550
people annually from 2000 to 2002
and net out-migration averaged 2,500
people annually from 2002 to 2007.
All the net in-migration to the HMA
during the 2000-to-2007 period accrued
to the Frederick County submarket.
From 2007 through 2010, net in-
migration to the HMA averaged 6,925
people annually. Net in-migration to
the Montgomery County submarket
was strong, at an average of 6,300
people a year, because of job growth
in the District of Columbia. During
the forecast period, net in-migration
to the HMA is expected to average
6,000 people annually. Tables DP-1
through DP-3 at the end of this report
contain demographic data for the
HMA and submarkets from 2000 to
the current date.
Figure 4.	Population and Household Growth in the Montgomery-
Frederick HMA, 2000 to Forecast
Notes: The current date is January 1, 2016. The forecast date is January 1, 2019.
Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current and forecast—estimates
by analyst
Figure 5.	Components of Population Change in the Montgomery-
Frederick HMA, 2000 to Forecast
Notes: The current date is January 1, 2016. The forecast date is January 1, 2019.
Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current and forecast—estimates
by analyst
Net natural change Net migration
2000 to 2010 2010 to current Current to forecast
Averageannualchange
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2000 to 2010 2010 to current Current to forecast
Averageannualchange
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Population Households
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
7
The population of the Montgomery
County submarket is an estimated
1.04 million. Since 2010, population
growth has averaged 12,550 people,
or 1.3 percent, annually. The submar-
ket accounts for about 80 percent of
the population of the HMA, and,
since 2010, 85 percent of the popula-
tion growth. Net in-migration aver­aged
5,250 people annually from 2010
through the current date. International
migration is a significant portion of
net in-migration in the submarket,
where 33 percent of residents were
born outside the United States (2014
ACS 1-year data). From 2010 to 2015,
a net average of 9,975 people moved
each year into the submarket from
outside of the country (U.S. Census
Bureau). Within the Washington-
Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-
WV MSA, this figure was second
only to Fairfax County, Virginia,
where international net in-migration
averaged 10,600 people annually.
Domestic in-migration to the Mont­
gomery County submarket is most
commonly from the District of
Columbia, whereas out-migration
occurs to most nearby counties in
Maryland and Virginia (2009–2013
ACS 5-year data). The population of
the submarket is expected to increase
by an average of 12,000, or 1.1 percent,
annually during the forecast period.
The population of the Frederick
County submarket is an estimated
246,200, reflecting an average annual
increase of 2,225, or 0.9 percent, since
2010. Net in-migration during that
period has averaged 1,075 people
annually, mostly from the Montgom-
ery County submarket and from
Howard and Carroll Counties to the
east. Population growth in the Freder­
ick County submarket is expected to
increase from the current rate to an
average of 2,800 people, or 1.1 percent,
annually, during the forecast period,
in part because of the relative afford-
ability of housing in the county com­
pared with the Montgomery County
submarket and Howard County.
An estimated 469,900 households
currently reside in the Montgomery-
Frederick HMA. Since 2010, the
number of households has increased
by an average of 4,875, or 1.1 percent,
annually. The increase from 2000 to
2010 was similar, at 4,725, or 1.1
percent, annually. Renter households
have accounted for 57 percent of
household growth since 2010 compared
with 37 percent during the 2000s.
The increase was mostly because of a
decline in owner household growth
since 2010, especially among house-
holders ages 25 to 54. This increase
in renter households has contributed
to a decline in the rental vacancy rate
since 2010. Since 2010, population
growth in the HMA has been relatively
strong in the population ages 55 to
74, which supported an increase in
existing home sales in recent years.
During the forecast period, it is antici­
pated that the number of house­holds
in the HMA will increase by an aver­age
of 5,100, or 1.1 percent, annually.
Population and Households Continued
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
8
Housing Market Trends
Sales Market—Montgomery County Submarket
The sales housing market in the
Montgomery County submarket is
slightly tight. The sales vacancy rate is
currently estimated at 0.9 percent,
down from 1.5 percent in 2010. The
inventory of available homes aver-
aged a 3-month supply during 2015,
unchanged from the average during
2014 and down from an average supply
of 4 months during 2010 (Metropoli-
tan Regional Information Systems
[MRIS®
]).
During 2015, existing home sales in
the submarket reached the highest
level since 2006. Approximately
12,200 existing single-family homes,
townhomes, and condominiums sold
during 2015, up 11 percent from the
number sold during 2014 (MRIS®
).
The total during 2015 was 31 percent
less than the peak of 17,550 existing
homes sold during 2004. Existing home
sales reached a low of 8,525 homes in
2008 before increasing an average of
5 percent annually from 2009 through
2015. Home sales increased year over
year in all but 2 years during the period.
In 2011, existing home sales declined
9 percent from 2010 because of new
statewide foreclosure procedures
implemented in mid-2010 that provided
greater protection for homeowners
facing foreclosure and also lengthened
the foreclosure process. In the submar­
ket, sales of foreclosed homes fell from
2,000 in 2010 to 400 in 2011 (Metro­
study, A Hanley Wood Company). The
second decline was 4 percent in 2014
from the year before, in part because
of a rise in mortgage interest rates.
During 2015, existing home sales prices
averaged $501,300, down 1 percent
from the average during 2014 (MRIS®
).
The average price had increased an
average of 3 percent each year from
2010 through 2014. By comparison,
the average existing home sales price
in the submarket doubled from 2000
through 2005, an average increase of
15 percent annually. The rapid increase
in home prices contributed to net
out-migration from the submarket in
the mid-2000s, and price gains sub­
sequently slowed during 2006 and 2007
to an average of 4 percent annually.
The average price peaked at $550,200
during 2007. Because of weakening
economic conditions in the HMA, the
average existing home sales price fell
rapidly during 2008 and 2009, declining
an average of 11 percent annually to
$434,200 during 2009.
Sales of foreclosed and real estate
owned (REO) properties comprised
30 percent of existing homes sold in
the HMA during 2008 and 2009 (Metro­
study, A Hanley Wood Company).
Because average sales prices for REO
homes are typically 45 percent less
than for nondistressed existing homes,
the large share during this period
weighed on home prices. During
2015, foreclosure and REO sales were
17 percent of existing home sales in
the Montgomery County submarket,
down from the share in 2008 and
2009 but significantly greater than the
1-percent share of existing home sales
in 2005 and 2006. The higher share of
foreclosures has contributed to a decline
in the homeownership rate since 2010;
the estimated 250,100 owner house-
holds currently residing in the submar-
ket represent 66.0 percent of total
households, down from 67.6 percent
in 2010 (Figure 6). Mortgage delin-
quency has improved, however, in
recent years. As of December 2015,
2.0 percent of home loans in the
submarket were seriously delinquent
(90 or more days delinquent or in
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
9
Figure 6.	Number of Households by Tenure in the Montgomery County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Note: The current date is January 1, 2016.
Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst
foreclosure) or had transitioned into
REO status, down from 2.7 percent a
year earlier and a peak of 6.1 percent
in January 2010 (CoreLogic, Inc.).
Sales of new homes totaled 1,125
during 2015, down 15 percent from
the number sold during 2014 (Metro­
study, A Hanley Wood Company).
New home sales reached a low of
1,000 units sold during 2011, partly
because of job losses during the
previous 3 years. From 2012 through
2013, new home sales increased an
average of 17 percent annually; sales
of new single-family detached homes
and townhomes increased, while sales
of new condominiums declined. New
home sales declined 5 percent in 2014.
The declines in 2014 and in 2015 are
partly because of a relatively high
volume of apartment completions in
the submarket.
Townhomes, single-family detached
homes, and condominiums represented
48, 41, and 11 percent of new homes
sold during 2015, respectively. Sales
prices during 2015 for new single-family
detached homes and townhomes aver-
aged $824,100 and $494,100, respectively.
New lowrise and midrise condominium
sales prices averaged $477,400, while
new highrise condominium prices
averaged $1.2 million. The highrise
condominium units sold during 2015
were exclusively at The Darcy, an
88-unit luxury building in Bethesda
that was completed in June 2015.
Homebuilding activity, as measured
by the number of single-family homes
permitted, generally has coincided
with the rise and fall in new home sales
since 2010. Homebuilding activity
increased by an average of 210 units,
or 18 percent, annually from 2010
through 2013 but declined by 260
homes, or 15 percent, during 2014
(Figure 7). During 2015, 1,325 single-
family homes were permitted in the
Montgomery County submarket, down
9 percent from the number permitted
during 2014 (preliminary data). Approx­
imately 140 single-family homes were
started during 2015 at Clarksburg
Village, a large, multiphase community
of 2,400 homes in the northwestern
portion of the submarket that has been
under construction since 2004, with
Figure 7.	Single-Family Homes Permitted in the Montgomery County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Notes: Includes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst
Housing Market Trends
Sales Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
2015
2014
2012
2007
Renter Owner
2000 2010 Current
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
10
prices currently starting at $543,000
(Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood
Company). The construction of 142
townhomes began in mid-2015 at
Grosvenor Heights, in Bethesda, with
prices for a three-bedroom elevator
unit with a two-car garage starting at
$1.17 million.
During the next 3 years, demand is
expected for 5,900 new homes in the
submarket (Table 1). The 570 homes
currently under construction will meet
a portion of the demand. New home
sales prices are expected to start at
$250,000 (Table 4). Because the median
household income in the submarket is
among the highest in the nation, 20
percent of the forecast demand is
expected for homes priced at $750,000
and above, which are typically found
in the Bethesda and Chevy Chase areas
bordering the District of Columbia.
A portion of the estimated 9,250
other vacant units in the submarket
may reenter the market and satisfy an
addi­­tional segment of the forecast
demand.
Table 4.	Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Sales Housing
in the Montgomery County Submarket During the
Forecast Period
Price Range ($) Units of Percent
From To Demand of Total
250,000 349,999 590 10.0
350,000 449,999 1,175 20.0
450,000 549,999 890 15.0
550,000 649,999 1,175 20.0
650,000 749,999 890 15.0
750,000 and higher 1,175 20.0
Notes: The 570 homes currently under construction and a portion of the esti-
mated 9,250 other vacant units in the submarket will likely satisfy some of the
forecast demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019.
Source: Estimates by analyst
Rental Market—Montgomery County Submarket
The rental housing market in the Mont­
gomery County submarket is currently
balanced. The overall vacancy rate is
estimated at 5.0 percent, down from
5.4 percent in 2010 (Figure 8). Strong
population growth and a relatively
high number of foreclosures has con­
tributed to the decline in the vacancy
rate since 2010. The overall rate includes
single-family homes and mobile homes,
which constitute 25 percent of occupied
rental units in the submarket (2014
ACS 1-year data). Single-family homes
in the submarket are typically rented
by larger, higher-income households
than the households that rent apart-
ments. Households that moved into a
rented single-family home in 2013 or
2014 (the most recent data available)
had an average income of $114,700,
had an average of 3.2 people in the
household, and paid a monthly rent
of approximately $2,175. By com-
parison, households that moved into
an apartment during the same period
had an average income of $70,300,
had an average of 2.0 people in the
household, and paid a monthly rent
of $1,525.
Apartment market conditions in the
submarket range from tight to slightly
soft. Of the six Reis, Inc.-defined
mar­ket areas that comprise the
sub­market, vacancy rates were lowest
in the North­east Montgomery and
Figure 8.	Rental Vacancy Rates in the Montgomery County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Note: The current date is January 1, 2016.
Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst
Housing Market Trends
Sales Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued
2000 Current2010
3.3
5.0
5.46.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
11
Kensington/Wheaton areas, with
rates of 1.7 and 2.7 percent, respec-
tively, during the fourth quarter of
2015 (Reis, Inc.). Vacancy rates were
slightly higher in the Gaithersburg/
Germantown and Silver Spring areas,
at 4.3 and 5.4 percent, respectively,
during the fourth quarter of 2015. In
the Bethesda/Chevy Chase and Rock-
ville areas, vacancy rates were highest,
at 6.0 and 9.2 percent, respectively;
each rate was up from a year earlier
because of concentrated construction
activity in these areas. Approximately
70 percent of apartments completed
in 2015 in the Montgomery County
submarket are in Bethesda or Rockville.
During the fourth quarter of 2015,
the increase in effective rents from the
fourth quarter of 2014 ranged from
1 to 3 percent in the six market areas.
At $2,176, the effective rent in the
Bethesda/Chevy Chase area is the
highest in the Montgomery County
submarket (Reis, Inc.). About 25 per­cent
of apartment properties in the market
area are highrise buildings compared
with 9 percent for the submarket as a
whole (Montgomery County Depart-
ment of Housing and Community Af-
fairs). Highrise apartments completed
in 2015 in the Bethesda/Chevy Chase
market area include Pallas at Pike 
Rose, with 319 apartments starting at
$1,800 and $1,960 for one- and two-
bedroom apartments, respectively.
Since construction was completed
in June 2015, 30 percent of the units
have been leased (Axiometrics Inc.).
The Silver Spring area is directly
north of the District of Columbia.
The effective rent in the market
area was $1,564 during the fourth
quarter of 2015. In terms of average
weekday passengers, the Silver Spring
station had the highest level of
ridership in 2015 of any Washington
Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
(metro) station in the Montgomery
County submarket. In close proximity
to the Silver Spring metro station,
construction began in September
2015 on Central, a 243-unit apart-
ment building that is expected to be
complete in mid-2017.
The Rockville area is near the geo-
graphic center of the Montgomery
County submarket. Along with the
city of Gaithersburg to the northwest,
Rockville is a major hub for jobs
related to scientific research. With
an effective rent of $1,766 as of the
fourth quarter of 2015 (Reis, Inc.),
apartments in the Rockville area are
generally less expensive than those
closer to the District of Columbia
in the Bethesda/Chevy Chase area.
Mallory Square Phase I is a 365-unit
apartment community completed in
2015 in the Rockville area, with rents
for studio, one-bedroom, and two-
bedroom apartments starting at $1,350,
$1,575, and $1,990, respectively. Nearly
one-half of the units at Mallory Square
Phase I have been rented since leasing
began in the second quarter of 2015
(Axiometrics Inc.). Permits were issued
in July 2015 for an additional 315
units at Mallory Square Phase II, with
com­pletion expected in mid-2016.
Multifamily construction activity, as
measured by the number of multifam-
ily units permitted, was strong in the
submarket in recent years. During
2015, 2,350 multifamily units were
permitted, down 19 percent from
the 2,925 units permitted in 2014
(preliminary data, with adjustments
by the analyst). From 2011 through
2013, the number of units permitted
averaged 2,800 annually (Figure 9),
more than three times the average of
900 units permitted annually from
2008 through 2010. By comparison,
Housing Market Trends
Rental Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
12
Figure 9.	Multifamily Units Permitted in the Montgomery County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Notes: Excludes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst
multifamily units permitted from
2000 through 2007 averaged 2,225
annually. Approximately 27 percent
of units permitted from 2000 through
2007 were condominiums, but only
7 percent were condominiums from
2010 through 2015.
During the next 3 years, demand is
expected for 6,500 new rental units in
the Montgomery County submarket
(Table 1). Demand is expected to
de­crease slightly each year with
improve­ment in the sales market
and household income growth. The
estimated 2,225 apartments currently
under construction, all of which are
expected to be complete by the end
of 2017, will satisfy a portion of the
demand. In addition, approximately
580 apartments are expected to begin
construction in early 2016, fulfilling
an additional portion of the forecast
demand by the end of 2017. Table 5
illustrates the demand for new market-
rate rental housing in the submarket
by number of bedrooms and rent level.
Table 5.	Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Rental Housing in the Montgomery County
Submarket During the Forecast Period
Zero Bedrooms One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three or More Bedrooms
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
1,300 to 1,499 230 1,350 to 1,549 1,550 1,650 to 1,849 1,475 1,900 to 2,099 260
1,500 to 1,699 65 1,550 to 1,749 390 1,850 to 2,049 730 2,100 to 2,299 200
1,700 or more 35 1,750 to 1,949 260 2,050 to 2,249 290 2,300 to 2,499 65
1,950 or more 390 2,250 or more 440 2,500 or more 130
Total 330 Total 2,600 Total 2,925 Total 650
Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Monthly rent does not include utilities or concessions. The 2,225 units cur-
rently under construction will likely satisfy some of the estimated demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019.
Source: Estimates by analyst
Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket
The sales housing market in the Fred­
erick County submarket is currently
balanced. Increasing levels of home
sales and limited homebuilding activity
during the past 5 years contributed
to a decline in the sales vacancy rate
from 1.8 percent in 2010 to a current
esti­mate of 1.4 percent. The inventory
of available homes averaged slightly
less than a 4-month supply during
2015, down from a 4-month supply
during 2014 and a 6-month supply
during 2010 (MRIS®
).
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
2015
2014
2012
2007
Housing Market Trends
Rental Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
13
Existing home sales activity in the
submarket has increased in nearly
every year since 2009. Approximately
3,850 existing homes sold during 2015,
a 19-percent increase compared with
the number sold during 2014. Home
sales activity in 2015 was 19 percent
less than the peak of 4,750 homes
sold during 2004 but was 78 percent
more than the 2,150 homes sold
during 2008. Home sales increased
an average of 7 percent annually
from 2009 through 2014, including a
4-percent decrease during 2011. The
decline in 2011 was related to new
statewide foreclosure procedures. In
the submarket, sales of foreclosed
homes totaled 1,600 homes in 2010
and 740 in 2011 (Metrostudy, A Hanley
Wood Company).
During 2015, the average price for
existing homes sold in the submarket
increased 1 percent, to $296,700,
compared with the average sales price
during 2014 (MRIS®
). The increase
during 2015 was less than the average
increase of 5 percent annually from
2012 through 2014. By comparison,
home sales prices increased an average
of more than 13 percent annually from
2001 through 2006 but declined an
av­erage of 7 percent annually from 2007
through 2011. The average existing
home sales price during 2015 remained
18 percent less than the peak of
$363,700 for homes sold during 2006.
The presence of distressed properties
contributed to the decline in the exist­ing
sales price at the peak of the local
economic contraction, but the effect
has attenuated in recent years. During
2009 and 2010, sales of foreclosed
and REO properties were 45 percent
of existing home sales in the Freder-
ick County submarket (Metrostudy,
A Hanley Wood Company). Distressed
sales declined to 26 percent of existing
sales during 2015. Likewise, the
per­centage of mortgage-delinquent
home­owners declined during the past
5 years. The percentage of home loans
that were seriously delinquent or had
transitioned into REO status in the
submarket peaked at 6.9 percent in
January 2010 before falling to 3.9 percent
in December 2014 and 3.0 percent in
December 2015 (CoreLogic, Inc.).
Sales of new homes totaled 630 during
2015, up 20 percent from the number
sold during 2014 and the highest
an­nual total since 725 new homes
sold during 2010 (Metrostudy, A
Hanley Wood Company). Townhomes,
single-family detached homes, and
condo­miniums represented 53, 37,
and 10 percent of new homes sold
during 2015, respectively. Townhomes
and condominiums have garnered an
increasing share of new home sales
each year since 2013. Sales prices
during 2015 for new single-family
detached homes, townhomes, and
condominiums averaged $511,400,
$372,500, and $255,800, respectively.
Single-family construction activity, as
measured by the number of single-
family homes permitted, was relative-
ly modest in recent years compared
with building in the early-to-mid
2000s. Although the homeownership
rate in the Frederick County submar-
ket is higher than in the Montgomery
County submarket, owner household
growth since 2010 in the Frederick
County submarket has been less than
one-half the rate during the 2000s.
The number of owner households in
the submarket is currently estimated
at 67,700 (Figure 10). From 2008
through 2014, an average of 710
single-family homes were permitted
annually, less than one-half of the
1,575 homes permitted annually
from 2000 through 2007 (Figure 11).
Housing Market Trends
Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
14
Figure 10.	Number of Households by Tenure in the Frederick County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Note: The current date is January 1, 2016.
Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst
Figure 11.	Single-Family Homes Permitted in the Frederick County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Notes: Includes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst
During 2015, 740 single-family homes
were permitted, down 7 percent from
the number permitted during 2014
(preliminary data). About 80 percent
of the 3,250 homes planned at Vil-
lages of Urbana, in the southeastern
portion of the submarket, have been
completed since construction began
in 2003 (Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood
Company). Construction began on
approximately 90 townhomes at
Villages of Urbana in 2015.
Major subdivisions that began construc-
tion in 2015 include Jefferson Place,
near the center of the submarket to
the southwest of the city of Frederick,
with prices for 825 townhomes and
condominiums starting at $274,990
and $252,990, respectively. The
construction of 600 single-family homes,
townhomes, and condominiums began
in November 2015 at Westview South,
also in the center of the submarket,
to the south of the city of Frederick.
Sales prices for single-family homes,
townhomes, and condominiums at
Westview South start at $449,990,
$322,990, and $266,990, respectively.
During the 3-year forecast period,
demand is expected for 2,775 new
homes in the Frederick County
sub­market (Table 1). The 400 homes
currently under construction will
meet a portion of the demand. New
home sales prices are expected to start
at $200,000, and the most demand
is expected for homes priced from
$300,000 to $399,999 (Table 6). A
portion of the estimated 2,450 other
vacant units in the submarket may
reenter the market and satisfy some
of the forecast demand.
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
2015
2014
2012
2007
Renter Owner
2000 2010 Current
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Housing Market Trends
Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
15
Table 6.	Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Sales Housing in
the Frederick County Submarket During the Forecast Period
Price Range ($) Units of Percent
From To Demand of Total
200,000 299,999 420 15.0
300,000 399,999 1,125 40.0
400,000 499,999 840 30.0
500,000 599,999 280 10.0
600,000 and higher 140 5.0
Notes: The 400 homes currently under construction and a portion of the estimated
2,450 other vacant units in the submarket will likely satisfy some of the forecast
demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019.
Source: Estimates by analyst
Rental Market—Frederick County Submarket
The rental housing market in the
Frederick County submarket is
currently slightly soft. The overall
rental vacancy rate is estimated at 6.5
percent, down from 6.8 percent in
2010 (Figure 12). In the submarket,
single-family homes and mobile homes
comprise 47 percent of occupied rental
units (2014 ACS 1-year data). As in
the Montgomery County submarket,
single-family homes in the Frederick
County submarket are typically rented
by larger, higher-income households
than the households that rent apart-
ments. Households that moved into a
rented single-family home in 2013 or
2014 had an average income of
$83,200, had an average of 2.7 people
in the household, and paid a monthly
rent of approximately $1,500. By
comparison, households that moved
into an apartment during the same
period had an average income of
$47,700, had an average of 1.8 persons
in the household, and paid a monthly
rent of $1,025.
The apartment market is slightly soft.
The completion in 2015 of two market-
rate apartment communities totaling
nearly 540 units contributed to a rise
in the apartment vacancy rate from
5.1 to 8.4 percent from the fourth
quarter of 2014 to the fourth quarter
of 2015 (Reis, Inc.). From early 2008
through mid-2010, a moratorium was
placed on major new residential
developments in unincorporated areas
of the Frederick County submarket,
which covers most land area in the
submarket. The moratorium limited
apartment construction activity, as
measured by the number of multifamily
units permitted, from 2009 through
2011 to an average of 80 units permit-
ted annually. The apartment vacancy
rate descended from 6.7 percent during
2009 to 3.2 percent during 2012.
Multi­family construction activity
increased significantly in 2012, when
420 multifamily units were permitted.
The 204-unit Park at Walnut Ridge
opened in early 2013, the first market-
rate apartment community built in
the submarket since 2007.
Figure 12. Rental Vacancy Rates in the Frederick County Submarket,
2000 to Current
Note: The current date is January 1, 2016.
Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst
Housing Market Trends
Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued
2000 Current2010
5.2
6.5
6.8
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
16
Construction activity remained rela­tively
strong in 2013 and 2014, with an aver-
age of 540 multifamily units permitted
annually (Figure 13). As new units
became available, the vacancy rate
increased to 4.4 percent during 2013
and again to 5.1 percent during 2014
(Reis, Inc.). East of Market, with 160
apartments in the city of Frederick,
opened in April 2015 with rents start­ing
at $1,395 and $1,680 for one- and
two-bedroom apartments, respectively
(Axiometrics Inc.). Prospect Hall,
with 376 units and also in the city of
Frederick, opened in June 2015 with
rents starting at $1,224 and $1,299 for
one- and two-bedroom units, respec-
tively; 50 percent of the units at Prospect
Hall are currently leased. The relatively
high number of apartments completed
during 2015 contributed to a flattening
of rents in the submarket. From 2010
through 2014, the average asking rent
increased an average of 3 percent
annually (Reis, Inc.). The average rent
was unchanged, however, from the
fourth quarter of 2014 to the fourth
quarter of 2015, at $1,126.
Despite the continued increase in
apartment vacancies in 2015, the
number of multifamily units permit-
ted increased further, to 560 units
permitted (preliminary data). Permits
were issued for the first five buildings
and 229 units at Urban Green Apart-
ments, in an area of the Frederick
County submarket bordering the
Montgomery County submarket. In
addition, the first building of 36 units
at Jefferson Place Apartments was
permitted in December. Urban Green
and Jefferson Place are each expected
to be complete in 2017. Rents are not
yet available for either development.
During the next 3 years, demand is
expected for 750 new rental units in
the Frederick County submarket
(Table 1). Demand is expected to
remain relatively stable each year. The
350 units currently under construction,
as well as the remaining units available
for lease at Jefferson Place Apartments,
will meet more than one-half of this
demand. In addition, approximately
450 apartments are expected to begin
construction in 2016, satisfying the
remainder of the forecast demand.
Apartments in planning include the
balance of units at Urban Green and
Jefferson Place and 137 age-restricted,
market-rate apartments at Worman’s
Mill Village in the city of Frederick.
Table 7 shows forecast demand by
number of bedrooms and rent level.
Figure 13.	Multifamily Units Permitted in the Frederick County
Submarket, 2000 to Current
Notes: Excludes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst
Table 7.	Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Rental Housing in
the Frederick County Submarket During the Forecast Period
One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three or More Bedrooms
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
Monthly Gross
Rent ($)
Units of
Demand
1,225 to 1,424 240 1,300 to 1,499 300 2,050 to 2,249 60
1,425 or more 60 1,500 or more 75 2,250 or more 15
Total 300 Total 380 Total 75
Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Monthly rent does not
include utilities or concessions. The 350 units currently under construction will likely
satisfy some of the estimated demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to
January 1, 2019.
Source: Estimates by analyst
Housing Market Trends
Rental Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
2015
2014
2012
2007
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
17
Data Profiles
Table DP-1. Montgomery-Frederick HMA Data Profile, 2000 to Current
Average Annual Change (%)
2000 2010 Current 2000 to 2010 2010 to Current
Total resident employment 581,382 621,789 648,600 0.7 0.8
Unemployment rate 2.7% 5.9% 4.1%
Nonfarm payroll jobs 545,800 558,800 585,900 0.2 1.0
Total population 1,068,618 1,205,162 1,290,000 1.2 1.2
Total households 394,625 441,886 469,900 1.1 1.1
Owner households 276,175 305,780 317,800 1.0 0.7
Percent owner 70.0% 69.2% 67.6%
Renter households 118,450 136,106 152,100 1.4 2.0
Percent renter 30.0% 30.8% 32.4%
Total housing units 407,649 466,041 493,200 1.3 1.0
Owner vacancy rate 1.0% 1.6% 1.0%
Rental vacancy rate 3.6% 5.6% 5.2%
Median Family Income $78,900 $102,700 $107,000 2.7 0.8
Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Employment data represent annual averages for 2000, 2010,
and the 12 months through December 2015. Median Family Incomes are for 1999, 2009, and 2014. The current date is
January 1, 2016.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; estimates by analyst
Table DP-2. Montgomery County Submarket Data Profile, 2000 to Current
Average Annual Change (%)
2000 2010 Current 2000 to 2010 2010 to Current
Total population 873,341 971,777 1,044,000 1.1 1.3
Total households 324,565 357,086 379,000 1.0 1.0
Owner households 223,017 241,465 250,100 0.8 0.6
Percent owner 68.7% 67.6% 66.0%
Rental households 101,548 115,621 128,900 1.3 1.9
Percent renter 31.3% 32.4% 34.0%
Total housing units 334,632 375,905 397,300 1.2 1.0
Owner vacancy rate 0.9% 1.5% 0.9%
Rental vacancy rate 3.3% 5.4% 5.0%
Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. The current date is January 1, 2016.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; estimates by analyst
Table DP-3. Frederick County Submarket Data Profile, 2000 to Current
Average Annual Change (%)
2000 2010 Current 2000 to 2010 2010 to Current
Total population 195,277 233,385 246,200 1.8 0.9
Total households 70,060 84,800 90,850 1.9 1.2
Owner households 53,158 64,315 67,700 1.9 0.9
Percent owner 75.9% 75.8% 74.5%
Rental households 16,902 20,485 23,150 1.9 2.1
Percent renter 24.1% 24.2% 25.5%
Total housing units 73,017 90,136 95,850 2.1 1.1
Owner vacancy rate 1.5% 1.8% 1.4%
Rental vacancy rate 5.2% 6.8% 6.5%
Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. The current date is January 1, 2016.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; estimates by analyst
Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS
18
Data Definitions and Sources
2000: 4/1/2000—U.S. Decennial Census
2010: 4/1/2010—U.S. Decennial Census
Current date: 1/1/2016—Analyst’s estimates
Forecast period: 1/1/2016–1/1/2019—Analyst’s
estimates
The metropolitan division and metropolitan
statistical area definitions in this report are based
on the delineations established by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in the OMB
Bulletin dated February 28, 2013.
Demand: The demand estimates in the analysis
are not a forecast of building activity. They are
the estimates of the total housing production
needed to achieve a balanced market at the end
of the 3-year forecast period given conditions on
the as-of date of the analysis, growth, losses, and
excess vacancies. The estimates do not account
for units currently under construction or units in
the development pipeline.
Other Vacant Units: In the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s)
analysis, other vacant units include all vacant
units that are not available for sale or for rent.
The term therefore includes units rented or sold
but not occupied; held for seasonal, recreational,
or occasional use; used by migrant workers; and
the category specified as “other” vacant by the
Census Bureau.
Building Permits: Building permits do not neces­
sarily reflect all residential building activity that
occurs in an HMA. Some units are constructed
or created without a building permit or are issued
a different type of building permit. For example,
some units classified as commercial structures are
not reflected in the residential building permits.
As a result, the analyst, through diligent fieldwork, makes
an estimate of this additional construction activity. Some
of these estimates are included in the discussions of
single-family and multifamily building permits.
For additional data pertaining to the housing market
for this HMA, go to huduser.gov/publications/pdf/
CMARtables_Montgomery_FrederickMD_16.pdf.
Contact Information
Benjamin Houck, Economist
Philadelphia HUD Regional Office
215–430–6678
benjamin.b.houck@hud.gov
This analysis has been prepared for the assistance and
guidance of HUD in its operations. The factual informa-
tion, findings, and conclusions may also be useful to
builders, mortgagees, and others concerned with local
housing market conditions and trends. The analysis
does not purport to make determinations regarding the
acceptability of any mortgage insurance proposals that
may be under consideration by the Department.
The factual framework for this analysis follows the
guidelines and methods developed by HUD’s Economic
and Market Analysis Division. The analysis and findings
are as thorough and current as possible based on informa­
tion available on the as-of date from local and national
sources. As such, findings or conclusions may be modi-
fied by subsequent developments. HUD expresses its
appreciation to those industry sources and state and local
government officials who provided data and information
on local economic and housing market conditions.
For additional reports on other market areas, please go to
huduser.gov/portal/ushmc/chma_archive.html.

More Related Content

What's hot

Security Analysis Project on Tata Global Beverages
Security Analysis Project on Tata Global BeveragesSecurity Analysis Project on Tata Global Beverages
Security Analysis Project on Tata Global BeveragesShameem Hamed
 
"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013
"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013
"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013Latvijas Banka
 
Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003
Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003
Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003HarshVerma196
 
Monthly Newsletter 3/2015
Monthly Newsletter 3/2015Monthly Newsletter 3/2015
Monthly Newsletter 3/2015Latvijas Banka
 
Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)
Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)
Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)Michael Matthews
 
Monetary policy review 2012 13
Monetary policy review 2012 13Monetary policy review 2012 13
Monetary policy review 2012 13StudsPlanet.com
 
Weekly media update 20 04_2020
Weekly media update 20 04_2020Weekly media update 20 04_2020
Weekly media update 20 04_2020BalmerLawrie
 
October 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2016 U.S. employment update and outlookOctober 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2016 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
 
Central and Eastern Europe September 17
Central and Eastern Europe September 17Central and Eastern Europe September 17
Central and Eastern Europe September 17CEO Magazyn Polska
 
Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013
Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013
Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013Latvijas Banka
 
October 2017 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2017 U.S. employment update and outlookOctober 2017 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2017 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
 
June 2020 PMI Slidepack
June 2020 PMI SlidepackJune 2020 PMI Slidepack
June 2020 PMI SlidepackRichard Ramsey
 
Mid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB report
Mid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB reportMid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB report
Mid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB reportDaniela Stundel
 
September 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
September 2016 U.S. employment update and outlookSeptember 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
September 2016 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
 
US employment rate data and trends – December 2016
US employment rate data and trends – December 2016 US employment rate data and trends – December 2016
US employment rate data and trends – December 2016 JLL
 
Weekly media update 06 09_2021
Weekly media update 06 09_2021Weekly media update 06 09_2021
Weekly media update 06 09_2021BalmerLawrie
 
Baltic Outlook January 2009
Baltic Outlook January 2009Baltic Outlook January 2009
Baltic Outlook January 2009Swedbank
 
Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)
Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)
Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)PublicFinanceTV
 

What's hot (20)

Security Analysis Project on Tata Global Beverages
Security Analysis Project on Tata Global BeveragesSecurity Analysis Project on Tata Global Beverages
Security Analysis Project on Tata Global Beverages
 
"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013
"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013
"Macroeconomic Developments Report", October 2013
 
Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003
Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003
Impact of-covid-19-on-indian-economy-ficci-2003
 
Monthly Newsletter 3/2015
Monthly Newsletter 3/2015Monthly Newsletter 3/2015
Monthly Newsletter 3/2015
 
Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)
Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)
Fixed Income Market Update (4-30-10)
 
Monetary policy review 2012 13
Monetary policy review 2012 13Monetary policy review 2012 13
Monetary policy review 2012 13
 
Weekly media update 20 04_2020
Weekly media update 20 04_2020Weekly media update 20 04_2020
Weekly media update 20 04_2020
 
October 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2016 U.S. employment update and outlookOctober 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
 
Ibd20131111
Ibd20131111Ibd20131111
Ibd20131111
 
Central and Eastern Europe September 17
Central and Eastern Europe September 17Central and Eastern Europe September 17
Central and Eastern Europe September 17
 
Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013
Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013
Macroeconomic Developments Report. April 2013
 
October 2017 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2017 U.S. employment update and outlookOctober 2017 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2017 U.S. employment update and outlook
 
June 2020 PMI Slidepack
June 2020 PMI SlidepackJune 2020 PMI Slidepack
June 2020 PMI Slidepack
 
hou160531
hou160531hou160531
hou160531
 
Mid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB report
Mid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB reportMid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB report
Mid-Year 2014 Mid Atlantic MOB report
 
September 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
September 2016 U.S. employment update and outlookSeptember 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
September 2016 U.S. employment update and outlook
 
US employment rate data and trends – December 2016
US employment rate data and trends – December 2016 US employment rate data and trends – December 2016
US employment rate data and trends – December 2016
 
Weekly media update 06 09_2021
Weekly media update 06 09_2021Weekly media update 06 09_2021
Weekly media update 06 09_2021
 
Baltic Outlook January 2009
Baltic Outlook January 2009Baltic Outlook January 2009
Baltic Outlook January 2009
 
Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)
Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)
Woody Hall Economic Conditions Presentation to NCLGIA (7/25/13)
 

Viewers also liked (12)

Modelo de relatorio_tecnico-cientifico
Modelo de relatorio_tecnico-cientificoModelo de relatorio_tecnico-cientifico
Modelo de relatorio_tecnico-cientifico
 
Otwarcie Atrium 2
Otwarcie Atrium 2Otwarcie Atrium 2
Otwarcie Atrium 2
 
Narrative theory
Narrative theoryNarrative theory
Narrative theory
 
MapStyle - Besoins et enjeux en cartographie
MapStyle - Besoins et enjeux en cartographieMapStyle - Besoins et enjeux en cartographie
MapStyle - Besoins et enjeux en cartographie
 
FMK2016 - Thomas Hirt- UML für FileMaker Entwickler
FMK2016 - Thomas Hirt- UML für FileMaker EntwicklerFMK2016 - Thomas Hirt- UML für FileMaker Entwickler
FMK2016 - Thomas Hirt- UML für FileMaker Entwickler
 
Verb
VerbVerb
Verb
 
Visualization to the rescue - AgileByExample
Visualization to the rescue - AgileByExampleVisualization to the rescue - AgileByExample
Visualization to the rescue - AgileByExample
 
Mediakit
MediakitMediakit
Mediakit
 
P5 andreadr
P5 andreadrP5 andreadr
P5 andreadr
 
Welcome to TapFox
Welcome to TapFoxWelcome to TapFox
Welcome to TapFox
 
КЕЙСЫ
КЕЙСЫКЕЙСЫ
КЕЙСЫ
 
Impact-Of-Inclusive-Design-UXI2016
Impact-Of-Inclusive-Design-UXI2016Impact-Of-Inclusive-Design-UXI2016
Impact-Of-Inclusive-Design-UXI2016
 

Similar to Montgomery MD comp-16

U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014JLL
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014Mercer Capital
 
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014Don Stewart
 
Lehigh Valley Outlook - June
Lehigh Valley Outlook - JuneLehigh Valley Outlook - June
Lehigh Valley Outlook - JuneDon Stewart
 
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookOctober 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
 
U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014JLL
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014Mercer Capital
 
November 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
November 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookNovember 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
November 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookJLL
 
Community Profile - Vanko
Community Profile - VankoCommunity Profile - Vanko
Community Profile - VankoCassie Vanko
 
Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014
Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014
Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014One Columbus
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015Mercer Capital
 
U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014JLL
 
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - August
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - AugustLehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - August
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - AugustDon Stewart
 
Economic Snapshot March 23, 2015
Economic Snapshot   March 23, 2015Economic Snapshot   March 23, 2015
Economic Snapshot March 23, 2015Kurt S. Altrichter
 
Market monitor template 032814
Market monitor template   032814Market monitor template   032814
Market monitor template 032814Linda Twining
 
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015Don Stewart
 

Similar to Montgomery MD comp-16 (20)

11.06.14 ed presentation cabinet
11.06.14 ed presentation   cabinet11.06.14 ed presentation   cabinet
11.06.14 ed presentation cabinet
 
HumbBizConfReport_Aug2015
HumbBizConfReport_Aug2015HumbBizConfReport_Aug2015
HumbBizConfReport_Aug2015
 
U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: November 2014
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2014
 
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - December 2014
 
Lehigh Valley Outlook - June
Lehigh Valley Outlook - JuneLehigh Valley Outlook - June
Lehigh Valley Outlook - June
 
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookOctober 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
October 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
 
U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: October 2014
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Year-End 2014
 
November 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
November 2015 U.S. employment update and outlookNovember 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
November 2015 U.S. employment update and outlook
 
Community Profile - Vanko
Community Profile - VankoCommunity Profile - Vanko
Community Profile - Vanko
 
Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014
Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014
Quarterly Economic Update | Q2 2014
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Auto Dealer Industry | Mid-Year 2015
 
Detroit JLL Industrial Employment Update June 2015
Detroit JLL Industrial Employment Update June 2015Detroit JLL Industrial Employment Update June 2015
Detroit JLL Industrial Employment Update June 2015
 
U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014
U.S. employment update and outlook: December 2014
 
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - August
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - AugustLehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - August
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - August
 
DC Development Report: 2014/2015 Edition
DC Development Report: 2014/2015 EditionDC Development Report: 2014/2015 Edition
DC Development Report: 2014/2015 Edition
 
Economic Snapshot March 23, 2015
Economic Snapshot   March 23, 2015Economic Snapshot   March 23, 2015
Economic Snapshot March 23, 2015
 
Market monitor template 032814
Market monitor template   032814Market monitor template   032814
Market monitor template 032814
 
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015
Lehigh Valley Job & Labor Market Outlook - May 2015
 

More from cutmytaxes

Commercial property tax appeal services
Commercial property tax appeal servicesCommercial property tax appeal services
Commercial property tax appeal servicescutmytaxes
 
Property Tax Strategy
Property Tax StrategyProperty Tax Strategy
Property Tax Strategycutmytaxes
 
2017 Final Tax Brochure
2017 Final Tax Brochure2017 Final Tax Brochure
2017 Final Tax Brochurecutmytaxes
 
ARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCAD
ARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCADARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCAD
ARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCADcutmytaxes
 
HFF Investment Overview
HFF Investment OverviewHFF Investment Overview
HFF Investment Overviewcutmytaxes
 
HCAD News Release - June 2017
HCAD News Release - June 2017HCAD News Release - June 2017
HCAD News Release - June 2017cutmytaxes
 
FY 2017-2018 State Tax Revenue
FY 2017-2018 State Tax RevenueFY 2017-2018 State Tax Revenue
FY 2017-2018 State Tax Revenuecutmytaxes
 
Notice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris County
Notice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris CountyNotice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris County
Notice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris Countycutmytaxes
 
Texas Economy Outlook 2017
Texas Economy Outlook 2017Texas Economy Outlook 2017
Texas Economy Outlook 2017cutmytaxes
 
May 2017 Rev - Tarrant County
May 2017 Rev - Tarrant CountyMay 2017 Rev - Tarrant County
May 2017 Rev - Tarrant Countycutmytaxes
 
Property Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for Filing
Property Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for FilingProperty Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for Filing
Property Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for Filingcutmytaxes
 
2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey
2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey
2017 Commercial Lending Trends Surveycutmytaxes
 
Tax Services For Private Capital
Tax Services For Private CapitalTax Services For Private Capital
Tax Services For Private Capitalcutmytaxes
 
HCAD News Release 2017
HCAD News Release 2017HCAD News Release 2017
HCAD News Release 2017cutmytaxes
 
Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017cutmytaxes
 
Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017
Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017
Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017cutmytaxes
 
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest ProceduresWilliamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedurescutmytaxes
 
Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017
Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017
Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017cutmytaxes
 
Tax rates 2017
Tax rates 2017Tax rates 2017
Tax rates 2017cutmytaxes
 
Property Tax Deferral Disabled Senior Citizens
Property Tax Deferral Disabled Senior CitizensProperty Tax Deferral Disabled Senior Citizens
Property Tax Deferral Disabled Senior Citizenscutmytaxes
 

More from cutmytaxes (20)

Commercial property tax appeal services
Commercial property tax appeal servicesCommercial property tax appeal services
Commercial property tax appeal services
 
Property Tax Strategy
Property Tax StrategyProperty Tax Strategy
Property Tax Strategy
 
2017 Final Tax Brochure
2017 Final Tax Brochure2017 Final Tax Brochure
2017 Final Tax Brochure
 
ARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCAD
ARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCADARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCAD
ARB Protest Hearing Procedues - WallerCAD
 
HFF Investment Overview
HFF Investment OverviewHFF Investment Overview
HFF Investment Overview
 
HCAD News Release - June 2017
HCAD News Release - June 2017HCAD News Release - June 2017
HCAD News Release - June 2017
 
FY 2017-2018 State Tax Revenue
FY 2017-2018 State Tax RevenueFY 2017-2018 State Tax Revenue
FY 2017-2018 State Tax Revenue
 
Notice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris County
Notice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris CountyNotice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris County
Notice of a Public Meeting Agenda - Harris County
 
Texas Economy Outlook 2017
Texas Economy Outlook 2017Texas Economy Outlook 2017
Texas Economy Outlook 2017
 
May 2017 Rev - Tarrant County
May 2017 Rev - Tarrant CountyMay 2017 Rev - Tarrant County
May 2017 Rev - Tarrant County
 
Property Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for Filing
Property Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for FilingProperty Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for Filing
Property Tax Appeals Real Property Petition and Instructions for Filing
 
2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey
2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey
2017 Commercial Lending Trends Survey
 
Tax Services For Private Capital
Tax Services For Private CapitalTax Services For Private Capital
Tax Services For Private Capital
 
HCAD News Release 2017
HCAD News Release 2017HCAD News Release 2017
HCAD News Release 2017
 
Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017
 
Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017
Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017
Tarrant Tax Sale - 2017
 
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest ProceduresWilliamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
 
Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017
Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017
Commercial Real Estate Market Trends - 2017
 
Tax rates 2017
Tax rates 2017Tax rates 2017
Tax rates 2017
 
Property Tax Deferral Disabled Senior Citizens
Property Tax Deferral Disabled Senior CitizensProperty Tax Deferral Disabled Senior Citizens
Property Tax Deferral Disabled Senior Citizens
 

Recently uploaded

ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700
ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700
ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700Truhomes
 
M3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial Ventures
M3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial VenturesM3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial Ventures
M3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial Venturessheltercareglobal
 
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate SuccessDavid Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate SuccessDavid Litt
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhidelhimodel235
 
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...asmaqueen5
 
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)Delhi Call girls
 
Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024
Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024
Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024VickyAulakh1
 
Purva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdf
Purva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdfPurva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdf
Purva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdfpritika141199
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhidelhimodel235
 
Vanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdf
Vanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdfVanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdf
Vanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdfkratirudram
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)Delhi Call girls
 
Majestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdf
Majestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdfMajestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdf
Majestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdfBabyrudram
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)Delhi Call girls
 
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...asmaqueen5
 
TENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports Work
TENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports WorkTENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports Work
TENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports WorkTurbo Tenant
 
Shapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time Together
Shapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time TogetherShapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time Together
Shapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time Togetheraidasheikh47
 
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...ApartmentWala1
 
Call Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCR
Call Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCRCall Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCR
Call Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCRasmaqueen5
 

Recently uploaded (20)

ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700
ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700
ACE Terra Yamuna Expressway | 8929888700
 
M3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial Ventures
M3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial VenturesM3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial Ventures
M3M The Line Brochure - Premium Investment Opportunity for Commercial Ventures
 
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate SuccessDavid Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
David Litt Foreclosure Specialist - Your Partner in Real Estate Success
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 55 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 7 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
 
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...Call Girls In Seelampur  Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
Call Girls In Seelampur Delhi ↬8447779280}Seelampur Escorts Service In Delhi...
 
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
2k Shots ≽ 9205541914 ≼ Call Girls In Sainik Farm (Delhi)
 
Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024
Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024
Greater Vancouver Realtors Statistics Package April 2024
 
Purva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdf
Purva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdfPurva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdf
Purva Soukhyam in Guduvancheri Chennai.pdf
 
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
9990771857 Call Girls in Dwarka Sector 08 Delhi (Call Girls) Delhi
 
Vanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdf
Vanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdfVanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdf
Vanam At Purva Soukhyam Guduvanchery.pdf.pdf
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Huda City Centre (Gurgaon)
 
Majestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdf
Majestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdfMajestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdf
Majestique Viman Nagar Pune Brochure.pdf
 
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Iffco Chowk (Gurgaon)
 
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best  in D...
Call Girls in Anand Vihar Delhi +91 8447779280}Call Girls In Delhi Best in D...
 
TENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports Work
TENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports WorkTENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports Work
TENANT SCREENING REPORT SERVICES​ How Tenant Screening Reports Work
 
Retail Center For Sale - 1019 River St., Belleville, WI
Retail Center For Sale - 1019 River St., Belleville, WIRetail Center For Sale - 1019 River St., Belleville, WI
Retail Center For Sale - 1019 River St., Belleville, WI
 
Shapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time Together
Shapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time TogetherShapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time Together
Shapoorji Pallonji Joyville Vista Pune | Spend Your Family Time Together
 
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
BPTP THE AMAARIO For The Royals Of Tomorrow in Sector 37D Gurgaon Dwarka Expr...
 
Call Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCR
Call Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCRCall Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCR
Call Girls in Karkardooma Delhi +91 84487779280}Woman Seeking Man in Delhi NCR
 

Montgomery MD comp-16

  • 1. C O M P R E H E N S I V E H O U S I N G M A R K E T A N A L Y S I S Montgomery-Frederick, Maryland U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research As of January 1, 2016 Frederick Montgomery Maryland Virginia Pennsylvania W estVirginia District of Columbia Carroll Loudoun Washington Howard Fairfax AdamsFranklin York Prince George’s Jefferson Arlington Housing Market Area The Montgomery-Frederick Housing Market Area (HMA), which is cotermi- nous with the Silver Spring-Frederick- Rockville, MD Metropolitan Division within the Washington-Arlington-­ Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropol- itan Statistical Area (MSA), comprises Montgomery and Frederick Counties in Maryland. This report examines each county as a separate submarket. An established biotechnology industry is a particular economic strength for the HMA, which boasts a highly educated workforce and high household incomes relative to national averages. Summary Economy Nonfarm payrolls in the Montgomery- Frederick HMA increased an average of 1.0 percent annually during the past 5 years, culminating in a gain of 8,300 jobs, or 1.4 percent, during 2015. Nearly every sector of the economy added jobs during 2015, with significant con­tributions from the scientific research, healthcare services, and food services industries. During the next 3 years, nonfarm payrolls are expected to increase annually by an average of 6,450 jobs, or 1.1 percent. Sales Market The sales housing market in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA is slightly tight. An increase in sales of existing homes and limited homebuilding activity have contributed to a tightening of the sales market since 2010. During the 3-year forecast period, demand is expected for 8,675 new homes (Table 1). The 970 single-family homes under construction and a portion of the 11,700 other vacant units that may reenter the sales market will satisfy some of the forecast demand. Rental Market The rental housing market in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA is balanced, with a vacancy rate of 5.2 percent. Conditions are softer in areas of concentrated apartment construction activity, including the Reis, Inc.-defined Bethesda/Chevy Chase, Rockville, and Frederick County market areas. Demand is estimated for 7,250 new market-rate rental units in the HMA (Table 1). The 2,575 apartments under construction will meet some of the demand. Table 1. Housing Demand in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA During the Forecast Period Montgomery-Frederick HMA Montgomery County Submarket Frederick County Submarket Sales Units Rental Units Sales Units Rental Units Sales Units Rental Units Total demand 8,675 7,250 5,900 6,500 2,775 750 Under construction 970 2,575 570 2,225 400 350 Notes: Total demand represents estimated production necessary to achieve a balanced market at the end of the forecast period. Units under construction as of January 1, 2016. A portion of the estimated 11,700 other vacant units in the HMA will likely satisfy some of the forecast demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019. Source: Estimates by analyst Market Details Economic Conditions................2 Population and Households......6 Housing Market Trends.............8 Data Profiles............................17
  • 2. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 2 Economic Conditions Economic strengths of the Montgomery-Frederick HMA include an established biotechnology industry and an emerging cybertech- nology industry. These industries are supported by a number of federal government agencies, private manu­ facturing and research firms, and a highly educated workforce. Approxi- mately 55 percent of the population ages 25 years and older has obtained a bachelor’s, graduate, or professional degree compared with only 30 percent nationally (2014 American Commu- nity Survey [ACS] 1-year data). The economy of the HMA has added payrolls during 12 of the past 15 years, mostly because of growth in service- providing sectors. Among all sectors in the HMA, the greatest percentage gain in jobs from 2000 through 2015 was in the education and health services sector (Figure 1). From 2001 through 2007, payrolls in the HMA increased by an average of 4,300 jobs, or 0.8 percent, annually, and the larg- est gains were in the education and health services and the professional and business services sectors. After the onset of the national recession in December 2007, nonfarm payrolls in the HMA declined by an average of 5,700 jobs, or 1.0 percent, annually from 2008 through 2010. Job losses in most sectors of the economy during this period more than offset gains in the education and health services sector and the federal government subsector. From 2011 through 2014, nonfarm payrolls increased by an average of 4,700 jobs, or 0.8 percent, annually. The sectors that contributed most to gains from 2011 through 2014 were the education and health services and the leisure and hospital- ity sectors. Holy Cross Germantown Hospital opened in the Montgomery County submarket in October 2014, adding approximately 600 jobs to the education and health services sector. Payroll growth accelerated to 1.4 percent in 2015 with the addition of 8,300 jobs (Table 2), the most jobs added year over year since 2005. Figure 1. Sector Growth in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA, Percentage Change, 2000 to Current Notes: Current is based on 12-month averages through December 2015. During this period, payrolls in the financial activities sector showed no net change. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Total nonfarm payroll jobs Goods-producing sectors Mining, logging, & construction Manufacturing Service-providing sectors Information Financial activities Professional & business services Education & health services Government Other services Leisure & hospitality Transportation & utilities Wholesale & retail trade – 30 20– 20 10– 10 0– 40 5030 40
  • 3. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 3 Table 2. 12-Month Average Nonfarm Payroll Jobs in the Montgomery- Frederick HMA, by Sector 12 Months Ending Absolute Change Percent ChangeDecember 2014 December 2015 Total nonfarm payroll jobs 577,600 585,900 8,300 1.4 Goods-producing sectors 49,700 50,600 900 1.8 Mining, logging, & construction 33,200 33,700 500 1.5 Manufacturing 16,500 17,000 500 3.0 Service-providing sectors 527,900 535,300 7,400 1.4 Wholesale & retail trade 71,500 71,700 200 0.3 Transportation & utilities 5,900 6,000 100 1.7 Information 14,400 14,200 – 200 – 1.4 Financial activities 38,700 38,900 200 0.5 Professional & business services 123,400 125,000 1,600 1.3 Education & health services 83,500 86,300 2,800 3.4 Leisure & hospitality 52,300 53,800 1,500 2.9 Other services 31,800 31,900 100 0.3 Government 106,400 107,400 1,000 0.9 Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Based on 12-month averages through December 2014 and December 2015. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics The education and health services sector led job growth, increasing by 2,800 jobs, or 3.4 percent. Holy Cross Health, one of the largest healthcare employers in the HMA, completed the construction of a 232,000-square- foot patient tower in Silver Spring, in the Montgomery County submarket, in November 2015. The leisure and hospitality sector gained 1,500 jobs, or 2.9 percent, including an increase of 1,200 jobs, or 3.1 percent, in the food services and drinking places industry. The new 140-room Cambria hotel & suites in the city of Rockville, in the Montgomery County submar- ket, also added jobs to the leisure and hospitality sector. The hotel is part of a $130 million mixed-use development that also includes the recently com- pleted 263-unit The Upton apartment community and 16,000 square feet of retail space. The professional and business services sector is the largest in the HMA, with 21 percent of total nonfarm payroll jobs (Figure 2). In 2015, the sector added 1,600 jobs, an increase of 1.3 percent, including a gain of 1,400 jobs, or 8.8 percent, in the scientific research and development services industry. The HMA is home to about 330 bio­­technology firms, including Glaxo­ SmithKline plc and MedImmune, Inc. (Maryland Department of Commerce). GlaxoSmithKline established a vaccine research center in Rockville in late 2015, adding approximately 600 jobs to the professional and business ser­vices sector. Other expansions anticipated to add jobs to this sector include those at the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, which is currently under construction in the Montgomery County submarket and expected to add 20 jobs on completion in early Figure 2. Current Nonfarm Payroll Jobs in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA, by Sector Note: Based on 12-month averages through December 2015. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic Conditions Continued Government 18.3% Leisure & hospitality 9.2% Other services 5.5% Education & health services 14.7% Professional & business services 21.3% Wholesale & retail trade 12.2% Manufacturing 2.9% Mining, logging, & construction 5.7% Information 2.4% Transportation & utilities 1.0% Financial activities 6.6%
  • 4. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 4 2016, and at VariQ Corporation, a cybersecurity services firm in the Montgomery County submarket that plans to add 250 employees through 2020. The government sector, which accounts for approximately 18 percent of total nonfarm payrolls, is the second larg- est sector in the HMA. The National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are major employers in the federal government subsector and are the two largest employers in the HMA, with 17,300 and 13,130 employees, respectively (Table 3). From 2007 through 2012, the federal government subsector increased by an average of 1,400 jobs, or 2.9 percent, annually. Across-the- board federal spending cuts mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (also known as sequestration) led to declines of 400 jobs, or 0.7 percent, annually in the federal government subsector during 2013 and 2014. The budget agreement signed in 2015 con­ tributed to a gain of 600 jobs, or 1.4 percent, in federal government payrolls in the HMA during the past year. The financial activities sector repre- sents less than 7 percent of nonfarm payroll jobs in the HMA but is one of the highest-paying sectors. Employers in the sector paid average weekly wages of $1,745 and $1,335 in the Montgomery County and Frederick County submarkets, respectively, as of the third quarter of 2015, ranking as the second highest wage by sector in the Montgomery County submarket and the highest wage by sector in the Frederick County submarket. From 2001 through 2007, the financial activities sector added an average of 800 jobs, an increase of 2.0 percent, annually. The sector subsequently declined by 1,200 jobs, or 2.7 percent, annually from 2008 through 2010 because of the national recession. The sector continued to lose jobs from 2011 through 2014 because of losses in the finance and insurance industry, including layoffs of approximately 70 employees at RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation in the Mont- gomery County submarket in late 2014. Jobs in the financial activities sector increased during 2015, however, by 200 jobs. An expanding apartment inventory in the HMA led, in part, to a gain of 300 jobs, or 2.4 percent, in the real estate and rental and leasing industry that more than offset a decline of 100 jobs in the finance and insur- ance industry. The manufacturing sector is also among the highest-paying sectors in the HMA. With average weekly wages of $1,947 and $1,072, manufacturing is the highest-paying sector in the Montgomery County submarket and the fourth highest-paying sector in the Frederick County submarket. Manu­ facturing jobs declined 41.5 percent overall from 2001 through 2013 but increased by an average of 400 jobs, or 2.8 percent, annually during 2014 and 2015. MedImmune, a pharmaceu- tical research and development firm with approximately 2,900 employees Table 3. Major Employers in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA Name of Employer Nonfarm Payroll Sector Number of Employees National Institutes of Health Government 17,300 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Government 13,130 Naval Support Activity Bethesda Government 11,690 Fort Detrick Government 6,400 Marriott International Leisure & hospitality 5,500 Lockheed Martin Corporation Manufacturing 4,690 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Government 4,600 Adventist Healthcare Education & health services 4,290 Holy Cross Hospital Education & health services 3,900 Giant Food Stores, LLC Wholesale & retail trade 3,150 Notes: Excludes local school districts. Data include military personnel, who are generally not included in nonfarm payroll survey data. Source: Maryland Department of Commerce Economic Conditions Continued
  • 5. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 5 in the HMA, added 160 employees at its manufacturing facility in the Frederick County submarket during 2014. In addition, MedImmune is investing $200 million to expand the facility, which is expected to add 300 jobs to the manufacturing sector by the time it is complete in 2017. The wholesale and retail trade sector increased by 200 jobs, or 0.3 percent, during 2015. The increase included the addition of 300 jobs, an increase of 0.5 percent, in the retail trade sub­­ sector and the loss of 100 jobs, or 0.7 percent, in the wholesale trade subsec­ tor. The opening in December 2015 of a new Safeway Inc. grocery store in Rockville added 150 jobs to the retail trade subsector. The construction of Clarksburg Premium Outlets began in the Montgomery County submarket in September 2015 and is anticipated to add 800 jobs to the wholesale and retail trade sector when it opens in October 2016. The unemployment rate in the HMA declined for the past 5 years because gains in resident employment outpaced growth in the labor force (Figure 3). Resident employment has increased each year since 2010, 1 year before the recovery in nonfarm payroll jobs began in the HMA, mostly because of the proximity of the HMA to the District of Columbia. The percentages of residents who commute to jobs in the District of Columbia are 15 percent for the HMA as a whole and 33 percent for Bethesda and Silver Spring, which directly border the national capital (U.S. Census Bureau). Because of economic expansion in the District of Columbia since 2010 and job growth in the HMA since 2011, the unemployment rate declined from a peak of 5.9 percent during 2010 to 4.1 percent during 2015. The average during 2015 was 1 percentage point higher than the average of 3.1 percent during the previous expansion period from 2001 through 2007. During the 3-year forecast period, non­ farm payrolls are expected to increase by 6,450 jobs, or 1.1 percent, annually. The professional and business services, education and health services, and wholesale and retail trade sectors are expected to lead job growth. The unem­ ployment rate is expected to return to the low levels of the early-to-mid 2000s. Two significant projects in planning are expected to add jobs to the min- ing, logging, and construction sector. The construction of the $3.3 billion commuter rail line, known as the Purple Line, connecting Bethesda and Silver Spring with Prince George’s County to the east is expected to begin in late 2016. It is estimated that the project will create thousands of jobs related to the design and construction of the line and add 420 jobs to the transportation and utilities sector when it is operational in 2022. In addition, The Universities at Shady Grove expects to begin construction in July 2016 on a $162 million biomedical sciences and engineering facility, with completion expected in 2018. Figure 3. Trends in Labor Force, Resident Employment, and Unem- ployment Rate in the Montgomery-Frederick HMA, 2000 Through 2015 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic Conditions Continued Unemploymentrate Laborforceand residentemployment 720,000 670,000 620,000 570,000 520,000 2000 2002 2004 Labor force Resident employment Unemployment rate 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2006 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2010 2008 2012 2013 2015 2014 2011
  • 6. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 6 Population and Households As of January 1, 2016, the population of the Montgomery- Frederick HMA is an estimated 1.29 million. From 2010 through the current date, population growth aver­aged 14,750 people, or 1.2 percent, annually (Figure 4). From 2000 to 2007, a period of economic expansion in the HMA, population growth aver- aged 12,500, or 1.1 percent, annually (U.S. Census Bureau decennial census counts and population estimates as of July 1). During this time, growth peaked at 1.9 percent from 2000 to 2001 but slowed to an average of 0.7 percent annually from 2005 to 2007, in part because rapidly increasing home prices deterred in-migration. From 2007 to 2010, population growth averaged 16,750, or 1.4 percent, annually. Growth was relatively strong during this period because of job gains in the District of Columbia, which, along with North Dakota and Alaska, was one of the few areas in the nation that added jobs overall from 2008 through 2010. During the 3-year forecast period, population growth is expected to average 14,650 people, or 1.1 percent, annually. Since 2010, net in-migration has aver- aged 6,300 people annually, account- ing for approximately 43 percent of population growth (Figure 5). From 2000 through 2007, net in-migration was relatively low, at an average of 2,825 people annually and only 23 percent of population growth. The rapid increase in home sales prices during the period contributed to the low level of net in-migration. In the Montgomery County submarket, where price increases were the great­est, net in-migration averaged 5,550 people annually from 2000 to 2002 and net out-migration averaged 2,500 people annually from 2002 to 2007. All the net in-migration to the HMA during the 2000-to-2007 period accrued to the Frederick County submarket. From 2007 through 2010, net in- migration to the HMA averaged 6,925 people annually. Net in-migration to the Montgomery County submarket was strong, at an average of 6,300 people a year, because of job growth in the District of Columbia. During the forecast period, net in-migration to the HMA is expected to average 6,000 people annually. Tables DP-1 through DP-3 at the end of this report contain demographic data for the HMA and submarkets from 2000 to the current date. Figure 4. Population and Household Growth in the Montgomery- Frederick HMA, 2000 to Forecast Notes: The current date is January 1, 2016. The forecast date is January 1, 2019. Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current and forecast—estimates by analyst Figure 5. Components of Population Change in the Montgomery- Frederick HMA, 2000 to Forecast Notes: The current date is January 1, 2016. The forecast date is January 1, 2019. Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current and forecast—estimates by analyst Net natural change Net migration 2000 to 2010 2010 to current Current to forecast Averageannualchange 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2000 to 2010 2010 to current Current to forecast Averageannualchange 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Population Households
  • 7. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 7 The population of the Montgomery County submarket is an estimated 1.04 million. Since 2010, population growth has averaged 12,550 people, or 1.3 percent, annually. The submar- ket accounts for about 80 percent of the population of the HMA, and, since 2010, 85 percent of the popula- tion growth. Net in-migration aver­aged 5,250 people annually from 2010 through the current date. International migration is a significant portion of net in-migration in the submarket, where 33 percent of residents were born outside the United States (2014 ACS 1-year data). From 2010 to 2015, a net average of 9,975 people moved each year into the submarket from outside of the country (U.S. Census Bureau). Within the Washington- Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD- WV MSA, this figure was second only to Fairfax County, Virginia, where international net in-migration averaged 10,600 people annually. Domestic in-migration to the Mont­ gomery County submarket is most commonly from the District of Columbia, whereas out-migration occurs to most nearby counties in Maryland and Virginia (2009–2013 ACS 5-year data). The population of the submarket is expected to increase by an average of 12,000, or 1.1 percent, annually during the forecast period. The population of the Frederick County submarket is an estimated 246,200, reflecting an average annual increase of 2,225, or 0.9 percent, since 2010. Net in-migration during that period has averaged 1,075 people annually, mostly from the Montgom- ery County submarket and from Howard and Carroll Counties to the east. Population growth in the Freder­ ick County submarket is expected to increase from the current rate to an average of 2,800 people, or 1.1 percent, annually, during the forecast period, in part because of the relative afford- ability of housing in the county com­ pared with the Montgomery County submarket and Howard County. An estimated 469,900 households currently reside in the Montgomery- Frederick HMA. Since 2010, the number of households has increased by an average of 4,875, or 1.1 percent, annually. The increase from 2000 to 2010 was similar, at 4,725, or 1.1 percent, annually. Renter households have accounted for 57 percent of household growth since 2010 compared with 37 percent during the 2000s. The increase was mostly because of a decline in owner household growth since 2010, especially among house- holders ages 25 to 54. This increase in renter households has contributed to a decline in the rental vacancy rate since 2010. Since 2010, population growth in the HMA has been relatively strong in the population ages 55 to 74, which supported an increase in existing home sales in recent years. During the forecast period, it is antici­ pated that the number of house­holds in the HMA will increase by an aver­age of 5,100, or 1.1 percent, annually. Population and Households Continued
  • 8. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 8 Housing Market Trends Sales Market—Montgomery County Submarket The sales housing market in the Montgomery County submarket is slightly tight. The sales vacancy rate is currently estimated at 0.9 percent, down from 1.5 percent in 2010. The inventory of available homes aver- aged a 3-month supply during 2015, unchanged from the average during 2014 and down from an average supply of 4 months during 2010 (Metropoli- tan Regional Information Systems [MRIS® ]). During 2015, existing home sales in the submarket reached the highest level since 2006. Approximately 12,200 existing single-family homes, townhomes, and condominiums sold during 2015, up 11 percent from the number sold during 2014 (MRIS® ). The total during 2015 was 31 percent less than the peak of 17,550 existing homes sold during 2004. Existing home sales reached a low of 8,525 homes in 2008 before increasing an average of 5 percent annually from 2009 through 2015. Home sales increased year over year in all but 2 years during the period. In 2011, existing home sales declined 9 percent from 2010 because of new statewide foreclosure procedures implemented in mid-2010 that provided greater protection for homeowners facing foreclosure and also lengthened the foreclosure process. In the submar­ ket, sales of foreclosed homes fell from 2,000 in 2010 to 400 in 2011 (Metro­ study, A Hanley Wood Company). The second decline was 4 percent in 2014 from the year before, in part because of a rise in mortgage interest rates. During 2015, existing home sales prices averaged $501,300, down 1 percent from the average during 2014 (MRIS® ). The average price had increased an average of 3 percent each year from 2010 through 2014. By comparison, the average existing home sales price in the submarket doubled from 2000 through 2005, an average increase of 15 percent annually. The rapid increase in home prices contributed to net out-migration from the submarket in the mid-2000s, and price gains sub­ sequently slowed during 2006 and 2007 to an average of 4 percent annually. The average price peaked at $550,200 during 2007. Because of weakening economic conditions in the HMA, the average existing home sales price fell rapidly during 2008 and 2009, declining an average of 11 percent annually to $434,200 during 2009. Sales of foreclosed and real estate owned (REO) properties comprised 30 percent of existing homes sold in the HMA during 2008 and 2009 (Metro­ study, A Hanley Wood Company). Because average sales prices for REO homes are typically 45 percent less than for nondistressed existing homes, the large share during this period weighed on home prices. During 2015, foreclosure and REO sales were 17 percent of existing home sales in the Montgomery County submarket, down from the share in 2008 and 2009 but significantly greater than the 1-percent share of existing home sales in 2005 and 2006. The higher share of foreclosures has contributed to a decline in the homeownership rate since 2010; the estimated 250,100 owner house- holds currently residing in the submar- ket represent 66.0 percent of total households, down from 67.6 percent in 2010 (Figure 6). Mortgage delin- quency has improved, however, in recent years. As of December 2015, 2.0 percent of home loans in the submarket were seriously delinquent (90 or more days delinquent or in
  • 9. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 9 Figure 6. Number of Households by Tenure in the Montgomery County Submarket, 2000 to Current Note: The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst foreclosure) or had transitioned into REO status, down from 2.7 percent a year earlier and a peak of 6.1 percent in January 2010 (CoreLogic, Inc.). Sales of new homes totaled 1,125 during 2015, down 15 percent from the number sold during 2014 (Metro­ study, A Hanley Wood Company). New home sales reached a low of 1,000 units sold during 2011, partly because of job losses during the previous 3 years. From 2012 through 2013, new home sales increased an average of 17 percent annually; sales of new single-family detached homes and townhomes increased, while sales of new condominiums declined. New home sales declined 5 percent in 2014. The declines in 2014 and in 2015 are partly because of a relatively high volume of apartment completions in the submarket. Townhomes, single-family detached homes, and condominiums represented 48, 41, and 11 percent of new homes sold during 2015, respectively. Sales prices during 2015 for new single-family detached homes and townhomes aver- aged $824,100 and $494,100, respectively. New lowrise and midrise condominium sales prices averaged $477,400, while new highrise condominium prices averaged $1.2 million. The highrise condominium units sold during 2015 were exclusively at The Darcy, an 88-unit luxury building in Bethesda that was completed in June 2015. Homebuilding activity, as measured by the number of single-family homes permitted, generally has coincided with the rise and fall in new home sales since 2010. Homebuilding activity increased by an average of 210 units, or 18 percent, annually from 2010 through 2013 but declined by 260 homes, or 15 percent, during 2014 (Figure 7). During 2015, 1,325 single- family homes were permitted in the Montgomery County submarket, down 9 percent from the number permitted during 2014 (preliminary data). Approx­ imately 140 single-family homes were started during 2015 at Clarksburg Village, a large, multiphase community of 2,400 homes in the northwestern portion of the submarket that has been under construction since 2004, with Figure 7. Single-Family Homes Permitted in the Montgomery County Submarket, 2000 to Current Notes: Includes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst Housing Market Trends Sales Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2015 2014 2012 2007 Renter Owner 2000 2010 Current 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0
  • 10. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 10 prices currently starting at $543,000 (Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood Company). The construction of 142 townhomes began in mid-2015 at Grosvenor Heights, in Bethesda, with prices for a three-bedroom elevator unit with a two-car garage starting at $1.17 million. During the next 3 years, demand is expected for 5,900 new homes in the submarket (Table 1). The 570 homes currently under construction will meet a portion of the demand. New home sales prices are expected to start at $250,000 (Table 4). Because the median household income in the submarket is among the highest in the nation, 20 percent of the forecast demand is expected for homes priced at $750,000 and above, which are typically found in the Bethesda and Chevy Chase areas bordering the District of Columbia. A portion of the estimated 9,250 other vacant units in the submarket may reenter the market and satisfy an addi­­tional segment of the forecast demand. Table 4. Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Sales Housing in the Montgomery County Submarket During the Forecast Period Price Range ($) Units of Percent From To Demand of Total 250,000 349,999 590 10.0 350,000 449,999 1,175 20.0 450,000 549,999 890 15.0 550,000 649,999 1,175 20.0 650,000 749,999 890 15.0 750,000 and higher 1,175 20.0 Notes: The 570 homes currently under construction and a portion of the esti- mated 9,250 other vacant units in the submarket will likely satisfy some of the forecast demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019. Source: Estimates by analyst Rental Market—Montgomery County Submarket The rental housing market in the Mont­ gomery County submarket is currently balanced. The overall vacancy rate is estimated at 5.0 percent, down from 5.4 percent in 2010 (Figure 8). Strong population growth and a relatively high number of foreclosures has con­ tributed to the decline in the vacancy rate since 2010. The overall rate includes single-family homes and mobile homes, which constitute 25 percent of occupied rental units in the submarket (2014 ACS 1-year data). Single-family homes in the submarket are typically rented by larger, higher-income households than the households that rent apart- ments. Households that moved into a rented single-family home in 2013 or 2014 (the most recent data available) had an average income of $114,700, had an average of 3.2 people in the household, and paid a monthly rent of approximately $2,175. By com- parison, households that moved into an apartment during the same period had an average income of $70,300, had an average of 2.0 people in the household, and paid a monthly rent of $1,525. Apartment market conditions in the submarket range from tight to slightly soft. Of the six Reis, Inc.-defined mar­ket areas that comprise the sub­market, vacancy rates were lowest in the North­east Montgomery and Figure 8. Rental Vacancy Rates in the Montgomery County Submarket, 2000 to Current Note: The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst Housing Market Trends Sales Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued 2000 Current2010 3.3 5.0 5.46.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
  • 11. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 11 Kensington/Wheaton areas, with rates of 1.7 and 2.7 percent, respec- tively, during the fourth quarter of 2015 (Reis, Inc.). Vacancy rates were slightly higher in the Gaithersburg/ Germantown and Silver Spring areas, at 4.3 and 5.4 percent, respectively, during the fourth quarter of 2015. In the Bethesda/Chevy Chase and Rock- ville areas, vacancy rates were highest, at 6.0 and 9.2 percent, respectively; each rate was up from a year earlier because of concentrated construction activity in these areas. Approximately 70 percent of apartments completed in 2015 in the Montgomery County submarket are in Bethesda or Rockville. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the increase in effective rents from the fourth quarter of 2014 ranged from 1 to 3 percent in the six market areas. At $2,176, the effective rent in the Bethesda/Chevy Chase area is the highest in the Montgomery County submarket (Reis, Inc.). About 25 per­cent of apartment properties in the market area are highrise buildings compared with 9 percent for the submarket as a whole (Montgomery County Depart- ment of Housing and Community Af- fairs). Highrise apartments completed in 2015 in the Bethesda/Chevy Chase market area include Pallas at Pike Rose, with 319 apartments starting at $1,800 and $1,960 for one- and two- bedroom apartments, respectively. Since construction was completed in June 2015, 30 percent of the units have been leased (Axiometrics Inc.). The Silver Spring area is directly north of the District of Columbia. The effective rent in the market area was $1,564 during the fourth quarter of 2015. In terms of average weekday passengers, the Silver Spring station had the highest level of ridership in 2015 of any Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (metro) station in the Montgomery County submarket. In close proximity to the Silver Spring metro station, construction began in September 2015 on Central, a 243-unit apart- ment building that is expected to be complete in mid-2017. The Rockville area is near the geo- graphic center of the Montgomery County submarket. Along with the city of Gaithersburg to the northwest, Rockville is a major hub for jobs related to scientific research. With an effective rent of $1,766 as of the fourth quarter of 2015 (Reis, Inc.), apartments in the Rockville area are generally less expensive than those closer to the District of Columbia in the Bethesda/Chevy Chase area. Mallory Square Phase I is a 365-unit apartment community completed in 2015 in the Rockville area, with rents for studio, one-bedroom, and two- bedroom apartments starting at $1,350, $1,575, and $1,990, respectively. Nearly one-half of the units at Mallory Square Phase I have been rented since leasing began in the second quarter of 2015 (Axiometrics Inc.). Permits were issued in July 2015 for an additional 315 units at Mallory Square Phase II, with com­pletion expected in mid-2016. Multifamily construction activity, as measured by the number of multifam- ily units permitted, was strong in the submarket in recent years. During 2015, 2,350 multifamily units were permitted, down 19 percent from the 2,925 units permitted in 2014 (preliminary data, with adjustments by the analyst). From 2011 through 2013, the number of units permitted averaged 2,800 annually (Figure 9), more than three times the average of 900 units permitted annually from 2008 through 2010. By comparison, Housing Market Trends Rental Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued
  • 12. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 12 Figure 9. Multifamily Units Permitted in the Montgomery County Submarket, 2000 to Current Notes: Excludes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst multifamily units permitted from 2000 through 2007 averaged 2,225 annually. Approximately 27 percent of units permitted from 2000 through 2007 were condominiums, but only 7 percent were condominiums from 2010 through 2015. During the next 3 years, demand is expected for 6,500 new rental units in the Montgomery County submarket (Table 1). Demand is expected to de­crease slightly each year with improve­ment in the sales market and household income growth. The estimated 2,225 apartments currently under construction, all of which are expected to be complete by the end of 2017, will satisfy a portion of the demand. In addition, approximately 580 apartments are expected to begin construction in early 2016, fulfilling an additional portion of the forecast demand by the end of 2017. Table 5 illustrates the demand for new market- rate rental housing in the submarket by number of bedrooms and rent level. Table 5. Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Rental Housing in the Montgomery County Submarket During the Forecast Period Zero Bedrooms One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three or More Bedrooms Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand 1,300 to 1,499 230 1,350 to 1,549 1,550 1,650 to 1,849 1,475 1,900 to 2,099 260 1,500 to 1,699 65 1,550 to 1,749 390 1,850 to 2,049 730 2,100 to 2,299 200 1,700 or more 35 1,750 to 1,949 260 2,050 to 2,249 290 2,300 to 2,499 65 1,950 or more 390 2,250 or more 440 2,500 or more 130 Total 330 Total 2,600 Total 2,925 Total 650 Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Monthly rent does not include utilities or concessions. The 2,225 units cur- rently under construction will likely satisfy some of the estimated demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019. Source: Estimates by analyst Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket The sales housing market in the Fred­ erick County submarket is currently balanced. Increasing levels of home sales and limited homebuilding activity during the past 5 years contributed to a decline in the sales vacancy rate from 1.8 percent in 2010 to a current esti­mate of 1.4 percent. The inventory of available homes averaged slightly less than a 4-month supply during 2015, down from a 4-month supply during 2014 and a 6-month supply during 2010 (MRIS® ). 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2015 2014 2012 2007 Housing Market Trends Rental Market—Montgomery County Submarket Continued
  • 13. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 13 Existing home sales activity in the submarket has increased in nearly every year since 2009. Approximately 3,850 existing homes sold during 2015, a 19-percent increase compared with the number sold during 2014. Home sales activity in 2015 was 19 percent less than the peak of 4,750 homes sold during 2004 but was 78 percent more than the 2,150 homes sold during 2008. Home sales increased an average of 7 percent annually from 2009 through 2014, including a 4-percent decrease during 2011. The decline in 2011 was related to new statewide foreclosure procedures. In the submarket, sales of foreclosed homes totaled 1,600 homes in 2010 and 740 in 2011 (Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood Company). During 2015, the average price for existing homes sold in the submarket increased 1 percent, to $296,700, compared with the average sales price during 2014 (MRIS® ). The increase during 2015 was less than the average increase of 5 percent annually from 2012 through 2014. By comparison, home sales prices increased an average of more than 13 percent annually from 2001 through 2006 but declined an av­erage of 7 percent annually from 2007 through 2011. The average existing home sales price during 2015 remained 18 percent less than the peak of $363,700 for homes sold during 2006. The presence of distressed properties contributed to the decline in the exist­ing sales price at the peak of the local economic contraction, but the effect has attenuated in recent years. During 2009 and 2010, sales of foreclosed and REO properties were 45 percent of existing home sales in the Freder- ick County submarket (Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood Company). Distressed sales declined to 26 percent of existing sales during 2015. Likewise, the per­centage of mortgage-delinquent home­owners declined during the past 5 years. The percentage of home loans that were seriously delinquent or had transitioned into REO status in the submarket peaked at 6.9 percent in January 2010 before falling to 3.9 percent in December 2014 and 3.0 percent in December 2015 (CoreLogic, Inc.). Sales of new homes totaled 630 during 2015, up 20 percent from the number sold during 2014 and the highest an­nual total since 725 new homes sold during 2010 (Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood Company). Townhomes, single-family detached homes, and condo­miniums represented 53, 37, and 10 percent of new homes sold during 2015, respectively. Townhomes and condominiums have garnered an increasing share of new home sales each year since 2013. Sales prices during 2015 for new single-family detached homes, townhomes, and condominiums averaged $511,400, $372,500, and $255,800, respectively. Single-family construction activity, as measured by the number of single- family homes permitted, was relative- ly modest in recent years compared with building in the early-to-mid 2000s. Although the homeownership rate in the Frederick County submar- ket is higher than in the Montgomery County submarket, owner household growth since 2010 in the Frederick County submarket has been less than one-half the rate during the 2000s. The number of owner households in the submarket is currently estimated at 67,700 (Figure 10). From 2008 through 2014, an average of 710 single-family homes were permitted annually, less than one-half of the 1,575 homes permitted annually from 2000 through 2007 (Figure 11). Housing Market Trends Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued
  • 14. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 14 Figure 10. Number of Households by Tenure in the Frederick County Submarket, 2000 to Current Note: The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst Figure 11. Single-Family Homes Permitted in the Frederick County Submarket, 2000 to Current Notes: Includes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst During 2015, 740 single-family homes were permitted, down 7 percent from the number permitted during 2014 (preliminary data). About 80 percent of the 3,250 homes planned at Vil- lages of Urbana, in the southeastern portion of the submarket, have been completed since construction began in 2003 (Metrostudy, A Hanley Wood Company). Construction began on approximately 90 townhomes at Villages of Urbana in 2015. Major subdivisions that began construc- tion in 2015 include Jefferson Place, near the center of the submarket to the southwest of the city of Frederick, with prices for 825 townhomes and condominiums starting at $274,990 and $252,990, respectively. The construction of 600 single-family homes, townhomes, and condominiums began in November 2015 at Westview South, also in the center of the submarket, to the south of the city of Frederick. Sales prices for single-family homes, townhomes, and condominiums at Westview South start at $449,990, $322,990, and $266,990, respectively. During the 3-year forecast period, demand is expected for 2,775 new homes in the Frederick County sub­market (Table 1). The 400 homes currently under construction will meet a portion of the demand. New home sales prices are expected to start at $200,000, and the most demand is expected for homes priced from $300,000 to $399,999 (Table 6). A portion of the estimated 2,450 other vacant units in the submarket may reenter the market and satisfy some of the forecast demand. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2015 2014 2012 2007 Renter Owner 2000 2010 Current 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Housing Market Trends Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued
  • 15. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 15 Table 6. Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Sales Housing in the Frederick County Submarket During the Forecast Period Price Range ($) Units of Percent From To Demand of Total 200,000 299,999 420 15.0 300,000 399,999 1,125 40.0 400,000 499,999 840 30.0 500,000 599,999 280 10.0 600,000 and higher 140 5.0 Notes: The 400 homes currently under construction and a portion of the estimated 2,450 other vacant units in the submarket will likely satisfy some of the forecast demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019. Source: Estimates by analyst Rental Market—Frederick County Submarket The rental housing market in the Frederick County submarket is currently slightly soft. The overall rental vacancy rate is estimated at 6.5 percent, down from 6.8 percent in 2010 (Figure 12). In the submarket, single-family homes and mobile homes comprise 47 percent of occupied rental units (2014 ACS 1-year data). As in the Montgomery County submarket, single-family homes in the Frederick County submarket are typically rented by larger, higher-income households than the households that rent apart- ments. Households that moved into a rented single-family home in 2013 or 2014 had an average income of $83,200, had an average of 2.7 people in the household, and paid a monthly rent of approximately $1,500. By comparison, households that moved into an apartment during the same period had an average income of $47,700, had an average of 1.8 persons in the household, and paid a monthly rent of $1,025. The apartment market is slightly soft. The completion in 2015 of two market- rate apartment communities totaling nearly 540 units contributed to a rise in the apartment vacancy rate from 5.1 to 8.4 percent from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the fourth quarter of 2015 (Reis, Inc.). From early 2008 through mid-2010, a moratorium was placed on major new residential developments in unincorporated areas of the Frederick County submarket, which covers most land area in the submarket. The moratorium limited apartment construction activity, as measured by the number of multifamily units permitted, from 2009 through 2011 to an average of 80 units permit- ted annually. The apartment vacancy rate descended from 6.7 percent during 2009 to 3.2 percent during 2012. Multi­family construction activity increased significantly in 2012, when 420 multifamily units were permitted. The 204-unit Park at Walnut Ridge opened in early 2013, the first market- rate apartment community built in the submarket since 2007. Figure 12. Rental Vacancy Rates in the Frederick County Submarket, 2000 to Current Note: The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: 2000 and 2010—2000 Census and 2010 Census; current—estimates by analyst Housing Market Trends Sales Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued 2000 Current2010 5.2 6.5 6.8 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
  • 16. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 16 Construction activity remained rela­tively strong in 2013 and 2014, with an aver- age of 540 multifamily units permitted annually (Figure 13). As new units became available, the vacancy rate increased to 4.4 percent during 2013 and again to 5.1 percent during 2014 (Reis, Inc.). East of Market, with 160 apartments in the city of Frederick, opened in April 2015 with rents start­ing at $1,395 and $1,680 for one- and two-bedroom apartments, respectively (Axiometrics Inc.). Prospect Hall, with 376 units and also in the city of Frederick, opened in June 2015 with rents starting at $1,224 and $1,299 for one- and two-bedroom units, respec- tively; 50 percent of the units at Prospect Hall are currently leased. The relatively high number of apartments completed during 2015 contributed to a flattening of rents in the submarket. From 2010 through 2014, the average asking rent increased an average of 3 percent annually (Reis, Inc.). The average rent was unchanged, however, from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the fourth quarter of 2015, at $1,126. Despite the continued increase in apartment vacancies in 2015, the number of multifamily units permit- ted increased further, to 560 units permitted (preliminary data). Permits were issued for the first five buildings and 229 units at Urban Green Apart- ments, in an area of the Frederick County submarket bordering the Montgomery County submarket. In addition, the first building of 36 units at Jefferson Place Apartments was permitted in December. Urban Green and Jefferson Place are each expected to be complete in 2017. Rents are not yet available for either development. During the next 3 years, demand is expected for 750 new rental units in the Frederick County submarket (Table 1). Demand is expected to remain relatively stable each year. The 350 units currently under construction, as well as the remaining units available for lease at Jefferson Place Apartments, will meet more than one-half of this demand. In addition, approximately 450 apartments are expected to begin construction in 2016, satisfying the remainder of the forecast demand. Apartments in planning include the balance of units at Urban Green and Jefferson Place and 137 age-restricted, market-rate apartments at Worman’s Mill Village in the city of Frederick. Table 7 shows forecast demand by number of bedrooms and rent level. Figure 13. Multifamily Units Permitted in the Frederick County Submarket, 2000 to Current Notes: Excludes townhomes. Current includes data through December 2015. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey; estimates by analyst Table 7. Estimated Demand for New Market-Rate Rental Housing in the Frederick County Submarket During the Forecast Period One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three or More Bedrooms Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand Monthly Gross Rent ($) Units of Demand 1,225 to 1,424 240 1,300 to 1,499 300 2,050 to 2,249 60 1,425 or more 60 1,500 or more 75 2,250 or more 15 Total 300 Total 380 Total 75 Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Monthly rent does not include utilities or concessions. The 350 units currently under construction will likely satisfy some of the estimated demand. The forecast period is January 1, 2016, to January 1, 2019. Source: Estimates by analyst Housing Market Trends Rental Market—Frederick County Submarket Continued 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013 2015 2014 2012 2007
  • 17. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 17 Data Profiles Table DP-1. Montgomery-Frederick HMA Data Profile, 2000 to Current Average Annual Change (%) 2000 2010 Current 2000 to 2010 2010 to Current Total resident employment 581,382 621,789 648,600 0.7 0.8 Unemployment rate 2.7% 5.9% 4.1% Nonfarm payroll jobs 545,800 558,800 585,900 0.2 1.0 Total population 1,068,618 1,205,162 1,290,000 1.2 1.2 Total households 394,625 441,886 469,900 1.1 1.1 Owner households 276,175 305,780 317,800 1.0 0.7 Percent owner 70.0% 69.2% 67.6% Renter households 118,450 136,106 152,100 1.4 2.0 Percent renter 30.0% 30.8% 32.4% Total housing units 407,649 466,041 493,200 1.3 1.0 Owner vacancy rate 1.0% 1.6% 1.0% Rental vacancy rate 3.6% 5.6% 5.2% Median Family Income $78,900 $102,700 $107,000 2.7 0.8 Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. Employment data represent annual averages for 2000, 2010, and the 12 months through December 2015. Median Family Incomes are for 1999, 2009, and 2014. The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; estimates by analyst Table DP-2. Montgomery County Submarket Data Profile, 2000 to Current Average Annual Change (%) 2000 2010 Current 2000 to 2010 2010 to Current Total population 873,341 971,777 1,044,000 1.1 1.3 Total households 324,565 357,086 379,000 1.0 1.0 Owner households 223,017 241,465 250,100 0.8 0.6 Percent owner 68.7% 67.6% 66.0% Rental households 101,548 115,621 128,900 1.3 1.9 Percent renter 31.3% 32.4% 34.0% Total housing units 334,632 375,905 397,300 1.2 1.0 Owner vacancy rate 0.9% 1.5% 0.9% Rental vacancy rate 3.3% 5.4% 5.0% Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; estimates by analyst Table DP-3. Frederick County Submarket Data Profile, 2000 to Current Average Annual Change (%) 2000 2010 Current 2000 to 2010 2010 to Current Total population 195,277 233,385 246,200 1.8 0.9 Total households 70,060 84,800 90,850 1.9 1.2 Owner households 53,158 64,315 67,700 1.9 0.9 Percent owner 75.9% 75.8% 74.5% Rental households 16,902 20,485 23,150 1.9 2.1 Percent renter 24.1% 24.2% 25.5% Total housing units 73,017 90,136 95,850 2.1 1.1 Owner vacancy rate 1.5% 1.8% 1.4% Rental vacancy rate 5.2% 6.8% 6.5% Notes: Numbers may not add to totals because of rounding. The current date is January 1, 2016. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; estimates by analyst
  • 18. Montgomery-Frederick,MD•COMPREHENSIVEHOUSINGMARKETANALYSIS 18 Data Definitions and Sources 2000: 4/1/2000—U.S. Decennial Census 2010: 4/1/2010—U.S. Decennial Census Current date: 1/1/2016—Analyst’s estimates Forecast period: 1/1/2016–1/1/2019—Analyst’s estimates The metropolitan division and metropolitan statistical area definitions in this report are based on the delineations established by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the OMB Bulletin dated February 28, 2013. Demand: The demand estimates in the analysis are not a forecast of building activity. They are the estimates of the total housing production needed to achieve a balanced market at the end of the 3-year forecast period given conditions on the as-of date of the analysis, growth, losses, and excess vacancies. The estimates do not account for units currently under construction or units in the development pipeline. Other Vacant Units: In the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s) analysis, other vacant units include all vacant units that are not available for sale or for rent. The term therefore includes units rented or sold but not occupied; held for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use; used by migrant workers; and the category specified as “other” vacant by the Census Bureau. Building Permits: Building permits do not neces­ sarily reflect all residential building activity that occurs in an HMA. Some units are constructed or created without a building permit or are issued a different type of building permit. For example, some units classified as commercial structures are not reflected in the residential building permits. As a result, the analyst, through diligent fieldwork, makes an estimate of this additional construction activity. Some of these estimates are included in the discussions of single-family and multifamily building permits. For additional data pertaining to the housing market for this HMA, go to huduser.gov/publications/pdf/ CMARtables_Montgomery_FrederickMD_16.pdf. Contact Information Benjamin Houck, Economist Philadelphia HUD Regional Office 215–430–6678 benjamin.b.houck@hud.gov This analysis has been prepared for the assistance and guidance of HUD in its operations. The factual informa- tion, findings, and conclusions may also be useful to builders, mortgagees, and others concerned with local housing market conditions and trends. The analysis does not purport to make determinations regarding the acceptability of any mortgage insurance proposals that may be under consideration by the Department. The factual framework for this analysis follows the guidelines and methods developed by HUD’s Economic and Market Analysis Division. The analysis and findings are as thorough and current as possible based on informa­ tion available on the as-of date from local and national sources. As such, findings or conclusions may be modi- fied by subsequent developments. HUD expresses its appreciation to those industry sources and state and local government officials who provided data and information on local economic and housing market conditions. For additional reports on other market areas, please go to huduser.gov/portal/ushmc/chma_archive.html.