The Arab-Israeli War

The Arab-Israeli War
1)Starting from November 1914 the ottoman empire entered the first world war with the alliance of
Germany. At first it was mentioned that the empire wanted to avoid any wars and wanted to have a
secure alliance with Britain. The reason being is that a leader named Enver Pasha felt that it was in
the empires best interest. Knowing that France, Britain, and Russia had grew their own empires and
could try and sabotage the Ottoman empire again. So enver led a secret negation with the
government of Germany and made a treaty to secure an alliance. This treaty in particular promised
things such as war material, financial assistance and military advisor. (chapter 6 pge148–149). The
outcome of starting a jihad on November,11,1914 wasn't as the Germany ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Going back to chapter six and seven France and Britain wanted to control and divide the Arab
countries to themselves. They saw Gamal abd el naser as "the champion of a dangerous new force".
Which obviously could hurt the mobilization of the vital interest in the middle east. (pg296–298).
Once the canal was secured the French authorities asked the government of Israel to attack, in result
that actually started the Arab–Israeli war. All three parties had a secret agreement to invade and
provoke the Arabs. But France and Britain knowing that they are both aiming towards their own
agenda and had a whole ultimatum to both the Egyptians and Israel. (pg301) regardless of the three
power houses fighting against Egypt, the Suez crisis was one of the most classic examples a military
defeat but turned into political victory. Another party emerges which is called ba'thism and it also
calls for full Arab unity, with the revolution Egypt and Syria had a new age of Arab unity. (pg306–
308). Chapter 11 is all about the decline of the Arab Nationalism. Now the blame shifts to the
Jordanian. The Saudis and Americans. They were seen as the progressive states unlike Syria, Egypt,
and Iraq. It seemed like every Arab state wanted to fight each other. Mostly the Palestinian and the
Jordanians. The only person that everyone thought could help was Gamal abd el Naser, being such
an influence to the whole Arab kingdom. But sadly, he died of a heart heart once the Jordanian and
Palestinian stop fighting for a bit. The Arab nation become depressed and then something happened
to the Arab world. It was firmly divided into states. They had their own agenda and interest to seek
for themselves. The governments to each decided each had their own wealth and some even could
control with oil.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Gush Thief
It has been ten years since the population of Gush Katif were ordered to move from their homes.
The enforced evacuation was an agonizing episode that has been recorded with tears in the annals of
Israeli history. Soldiers were forced to execute a plan with which they disagreed and images of IDF
soldiers confronting Israeli residents during the evacuation were heartbreaking. Even today.
Many residents were religious, but there were countless secular Jews. The community of 8,600 were
confident that the sand dunes of this ocean side area could be productive farming land and they
worked hard to develop this smallest region. In nourishing the desert, Israel gained another area that
could flourish.
Nezer Hazani was the first Gazan Jewish village ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Today, you can visit the Gush Katif Museum in Jerusalem and the event is remembered each year on
Gush Katif Day, celebrated on February 11th by every school in the Israeli Educational system.
"The Gush Katif Committee and the Gush Katif and Northern Shomron Heritage Center decided
that there is an educational value to the Gush Katif story. The 22nd of Shvat, is a day that celebrates
religious faith, Zionism, settlements, and the Israeli State as well as discussing their complexity.
This day was chosen as Gush Katif Day because it is the anniversary of the day when Netzer
Hazani, the first civilian community in Gush Katif, was

Arab Israeli Conflict
1.1 WHAT IS THE ARAB ISRAELI CONFLICT? The Arab–Israeli conflict is a hotly contested
issue both in the Middle East and the broader global community.1 The modern conflict is essentially
a dispute over the area known up until 1948 as Palestine, which is considered holy to all three major
monotheistic religions.2 The primary parties in the conflict are Israeli (formerly Zionist) Jews and
Palestinian Arabs (who are predominately Muslim).3 It is one of the unresolved problems
bequeathed to the region by the British and French imperialist powers following the division of the
Ottoman Empire between them at the end of World War 1.4 There are many features of the Middle
East, specifically Palestine, that account for the interest and rivalry it ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The agreement carved up the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire and divided control of the
region between the two superpowers. Britain's three agreements were incompatible, and laid the
foundations for future frustration and conflict.3 2.2 THE MANDATE PERIOD Following triumph
in World War 1, Britain was given a mandate to govern the Holy Land from the League of Nations,
from 29 September 1923.13 In August 1929 violence erupted in Palestine between Muslims and
Jews over access to the Western Wall in Jerusalem. Between 23 and 29 August, 133 Jews were
killed and 339 others were injured by Arabs. 110 Arabs were killed and 232 were also injured, many
by British police trying to quash the riots.11 In May 1936, the Arab community revolted again
against British rule, demanding independence and opposing increasing Jewish immigration.8 During
the British mandate, the political landscape of Palestine was completely transformed.1 3.1 World
War II Britain's policies changed drastically throughout the early stages of the Arab Israeli conflict.
Britain began to reconsidered her

Israeli Security Concerns
Abstract The following essay takes a realist approach to the issue of Israel's refugee problem. The
essay addresses the security issue of the 'Right of Return 'where more than 4 million Palestinian
termed refugees clamor to return to their homes that they were displaced from during the 1948 war.
Whilst Palestinians demand the right to return to their Israeli–located homes under the right of
United Nations General Assembly article 11 of Resolution 194, Israelis fear the displacement of
their state by a huge and exponential number of Palestinian refugees returning. The essay
summarizes historical points that constitute the problem. Analysis of the problems shows that the
traditional definition of 'refugee' has been corrupted to suit UNRWA agenda where the refugee
number has grown and will continue to grow to absurd lengths. One policy therefore recommends
that the UN amend this definition to reflect a more solid reality. An alternate policy recommends
that the UNRWA be replaced by its more affective predecessor, the UNHRCA. The essay, too,
recommends that America work in amending this change since by so doing America will be
assisting her own terrorist problem. Table of contents A "Realistic" Approach to Regional Security
in Israel Why the USA should care Key Issues to be Resolved The Issue of 'Right of Return'
Refugees Introduction: Historical points: The Refugee Issue at the Moment Analysis of 'Refugee'
Policy An alternate policy recommendation for the refugee

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Essay
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict was started when the United Nations proposed the partition plan for
Jewish homeland in 1947. The Jewish agrees with the plan but the Palestinians disagree because
they think it is unfair for their land being taken. Since then, many wars have been fought between
Israel and Palestinians such as:
–1948 War of independence –1956 Sinai war
–1967 six day war –1973 Yom Kippur war etc.
These wars had made angry Palestinian lost more and more land causing many terrorist attacks and
suicide bombings occurred during the conflict planned by Palestinian terrorist organizations such as
the Hamas. Civil Palestinians' anger had also lead to Intifada (1987) and Second ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
–Israeli settlements––––––––––––––Should the Israelis take down the settlements and let
Palestinian build their own? (land problem)
–Palestinians –The anger of Palestinians has lead to the circle of violence and suicide bombings and
Intifada had caused more Palestinians to die. (Violence issue)
–Israelis–the Israeli government have to protect their boarders by using armed forces from being
attack but this can lead to collateral damages (violence issue) Different perspectives
–Quartet of Middle east– recognizes Israel but also wants Palestinian to have their own state. They
struggle to find a way for peace. There are different resolutions that have been suggested such as the
Oslo Peace Accords in 1993, Road map for peace, Camp David Summit 2000, etc. but it all failed.
–Palestinians–most Palestinian organizations like Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) just
want to have their own state and Israelis withdrawn from the occupied territories but extremist like
Hamas wants to takeover the whole Israel and either make Jews as second citizens or push them to
the sea.
–Israelis–most political group in Israel also wants peace with Palestinians and come up with plans
like the disengagement plan in 2005. But Zionism extremist suggests that they should takeover the
occupied

Israeli Palestinian Conflict
The Israeli– Palestinian conflict, which arguably began following the creation of Israel in the mid–
twentieth century after the Second World War, traces its roots back down to concepts such as
zionism and arab nationalism that developed throughout the century, and through injustices dealt by
both sides, manages to reap on the lives of countless individuals, regardless of religious and racial
affiliation. Although one can argue for the case of one side over the other, not one position seems to
be more justified in their actions, as both angles depict strong rationale and, on the other hand,
illustrate tenuous inequity expanded or eliminated through emotionally driven biases and framing,
In spite of both sides being both warranted and unreasonable, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If, for example, most people are aligned with a particular atmosphere surrounding an aspect of a
definite conception, but, if for some reason one person may not completely agree with the idea, they
are more likely to follow the tide instead of speaking out because assertiveness on a unpopular
standpoint can result in gradual ostracization. This is because humans are naturally social creatures,
and by social cues, humans are guided as norms present what is appropriate to a given society; by
asserting an avoided stance on a thought, one can easily be disregarded if there is no support given
by culture. Staying impressionable to society is safe in most every way, and is done by
generalizations (i.e. thin slicing). However, environments can present limitations as not all
information is credible, nor is the information sustainable– it is flexible, which can smoothy muddle
the boundaries of what is socially acceptable. In addition, generalizations can feed into negative
labels that can push violence and bigotry without any objective

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
"Since Biblical times there has been a conflict between the Arabs and the Jews in what today is
known as Israel. It began with the birth of two boys, Ismael and Isaac; born to two different mothers
and fathered by Abraham. That conflict has become more intricate, more serious and much more
complicated" ("Israeli–Palestinian Conflict."). "Beginning with the Diaspora and furthered by the
British Mandate post World War I and the Holocaust during the period of World War II, Jews sought
to return to their Homeland only to find that they once again were unwanted; this time by their Arab
brethren. Wars ensued and further complications arose.Time and again war has broken out between
the two peoples, solutions sought but not found and the search for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Barriers to Peace in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict." Kas.de. The Jerusalem Institute for Israel
Studies, 2010. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Introduction to Israel: Opposing Viewpoints." Israel. Ed. Myra Immell. Detroit: Greenhaven Press,
2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Israeli–Palestinian Conflict." Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. 23 July 2014. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Primer on Palestine, Israel and the Arab–Israeli Conflict." Primer on Palestine, Israel and the Arab–
Israeli Conflict | Middle East Research and Information Project. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
"Stick a label on it; Israel and Palestine." The Economist 14 Nov. 2015: 49(US). Religion and
Philosophy Collection. Web. 24 Apr. 2016.
Zamkanei, Shayna. "The politics of defining Jews from Arab countries." Israel Studies 21.2 (2016):
1+. Religion and Philosophy Collection. Web. 24 Apr.

The Arab-Israeli Conflict Essays
The current conflict in the Middle East between the Israeli Jews and the Palestinian Arabs has many
historical roots. Several events in the history of this conflict have been very important and also have
a strong connection with the current situation between the two sides.
One of these important events was the Nazi Holocaust. During the Second World War the Jews were
persecuted by the Nazis and sent to concentration camps. By the end of the war in 1945 6 million
Jews were killed and 250,000 were freed from the concentration camps. As news about the
holocaust emerged there was widespread sympathy for the Jews especially in the U.S.A. which had
a large Jewish population. As a result of this, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Six Day War of 1967 was a dramatic military victory for the Israelis. In just six days the Israeli
army managed to take out most of the surrounding Arab state's air force and regained control of the
land that was lost in previous battles. The Israelis had taken Sinai, the Gaza Strip, the West Bankand
Jerusalem. The Golan Heights were also seized by the Israelis which is a very advantageous military
spot because it is an area of high ground on the border of Israel and Syria. The Israelis came out of
the war feeling proud and victorious that they managed to take on the three Arab countries by
themselves. They were seen as the stronger military side by the rest of the world. The Arab states
were left with little land or pride after the humiliation of the war. The PLO (Palestine Liberation
Organisation) began to grow in size because the Palestinians were determined to fight for their
homeland after this embarrassing defeat. Terrorism soon started to spread to Europe and other parts
of the world like in 1972 when 9 Palestinians seized and killed 11 Israeli athletes at the Olympic
Games. This act of terrorism and others like it were the result of divisions within the PLO which
lead to the creation of extremist groups who decided that raids on

The Arab-Israeli Conflict Essay
Name 1
Your Name
Pol 340–01
March 20, 2008
Term Paper
The Arab– Israeli Conflict
The Arab– Israeli Conflict is a conflict between the Arab and Jewish people in the Middle East over
Israel and Palestine. This conflict has led to wars and millions of displaced people. This particular
conflict has historical origins in the lives of the Arab and Jewish people. "The beginning of Zionism
and the Arab–Israeli Conflict explain the basic principles of this complicated dispute"(Frankel 17).
During the course of history, different groups have invaded Israel and Palestine. The area is
historically the homeland of the Jewish people who migrated to the area in the thirteenth century as
Hebrew tribes. These Hebrew tribes are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Between 1920 and 1921 clashes arose between the Arabs and Jews and equal amounts of people
were killed on both sides.
After World War II the conflict between the Arabs and Jews over Palestine caused the British to
release their mandate over Palestine. The British requested that the United Nations determine the
fate of Palestine. The UN determined that the country would have to be divided in order to meet the
needs of both the Jewish and Arab people. In 1947 the UN determined that there should be a
partition of two states, one Jewish state and one Arab state. The land was divided so that each state
would have a majority of its own population, although some of the Jewish state would fall under the
Palestinian state and some of the Palestinian state would fall under the Jewish state. Jerusalem and
Bethlehem were determined to be an international zone. The Zionist Jewish people
Name 4 accepted the partition and the Arab people did not. The Arab people felt that because the
Jewish people received a little more territory that the land was divided unequally. The UN claim that
the land was divided the way that it was because the Jewish people were the majority and the idea
that more people would migrate to the Jewish territory for the blended border lines was the reason

for allowing the Jewish people more space. "Fighting began between the Arab and Jewish residents
of Palestine days

The Israeli-Palestinian Wall
The Israeli–Palestinian wall that has been under construction for nearly twelve years is adding more
fuel to a fire that appears to only be growing. The wall has been doing more harm to the Israeli–
Palestinian conflict than good. Ironically, the wall was created to help the conflict during the time of
the Second Intifada that occurred from 2000 to 2006. The intention of the wall at the time was to put
"...an end to the phenomenon of cross–border Palestinian suicide bombers", and also had a "...wide
support withing Israel, where it is seen as a security measure" (Procon.org 2). Over time, the once
perceived "security measure" turned into a negative aftereffect, mainly for the Palestinians. The
Israeli–Palestinian wall has negative outcomes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Palestinian economy, due to the route of the wall, has suffered tremendously. The displacement
of Palestinian civilians has been a major contributor to this issue. New rules and regulations require
citizens who live in the territory between the green line must apply for a series of permits that would
allow them to live, drive, and work in the zone in which they are entrapped (Roy 34). Therefore, as
Theirry Delbreuve said, "...agricultural communities were losing contact with the land on which
they depended both for their present livelihood and for their future survival" (United Nations Page
2). Palestine's economy has suffered tremendously, because Israel has made it possible through the
construction of the wall to have full control over Palestinian's resources, such as land, water, and
labor. This in turn has created Palestinian economic dependence on and with Israel (Current History
Page 32). As stated in Current History, the World Bank estimates that it will take some 20 years for
the Palestinian economy to return to where it was on the eve of the current Intifada, as their
economy has contracted by half (Page 32). Palestine's "...access to work, food, housing, and other
needed resources has been severely eroded" (Current History Page 35), having a huge economic toll
on Palestine's economy, which in turn has increased tensions between the

Essay on Israeli Settlements
On the 17th of April 2012, Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent a letter to Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicating the only way the Palestinian Authority would agree
to move forward with peace talks is if Israel would agree to freeze the building of settlements in the
West Bank1. Israeli settlements in the West Bank have become the largest obstacle in negotiating a
two–state solution and it appears the continued expansion of Israeli settlements may render a two–
state solution impossible. Inside the Israeli government following the 1967 war there was a debate
about how to deal with the newly occupied territories of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula,
and Golan Heights. The debate revolved around two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With Israel's border needs in mind, Allon proposed a multifaceted solution for Israel's occupation of
the West Bank. He suggested Israel would incorporate the Jordan Valley, the Judean desert along the
west coast of the Dead Sea, the area surrounding the Jerusalem metropolitan area, and a small tract
of land south west of the Palestinian city of Hebron6. This configuration of newly incorporated land
was designed to "provide Israel with the minimal defensible borders that are indispensable without
impairing, to any meaningful extent, the basic interests of the other side, including those of the
Palestinian community"7. It is important to note that Allon envisioned that the non–incorporated
"Palestinian" parts of the West Bank would remain free of Israeli settlers and would eventually be
handed back to the Kingdom of Jordan in order to form a future Jordanian–Palestinian state. The
second important part of Allon's plan is the use of a "selective settlement policy" within the
incorporated areas of the West Bank as part of Israel's defense strategy8. The selective settlement
policy allowed for Israelis to settle in the West Bank, but only in areas lacking large Palestinian
cities and villages. Unfortunately, the Allon Plan failed to account for the religious fundamentalism
that would motivate much of the settlement building in the West Bank.
Founded in 1974, the Gush Emunim movement strongly advocated the return of Jews to the

Arab Israeli Conflict Dbq
The Arab Israeli conflict is one of the major dilemmas in the world in the modern history. Many
political leaders assume that this is the most complicated conflict around the world, even bigger than
Cold War. During the 1960's and the 1970's, the Arab world decided to go with confrontation and
fight fire with fire. The Middle East became a war zone where all the Arab countries lined up to win
back Palestine. However, the Israeli cabinet was smart enough to maintain their presence in the
Palestinian Land. Nevertheless, many Arabic Leaders did not manage the war against Israel
vigorously.
There were many other reasons that caused the tense relationship between Nasser and the western
powers. However the Arab– Israeli conflict was the biggest ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The declaration was written by the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour. The
declaration was directed to the Zionist community where it stated:
His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non–Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in
any other country.
This declaration triggered the hatred of the Arabs towards the Jewish people, ringing the bells of an
unending war. This shows that Britain was the biggest ally of the Jewish state during the early 20th
century.
Soon the USA was able to substitute the British role. After WWII, the Jewish society were able to
deliver the tragedy that took place in Germany; they were able to influence the ultimate powers in
the world, convening them that the Nazis tortured the Jewish people and burned them down to death
during the Holocaust. Therefore the Jewish people were able to gain the sympathy of all Europe and
the USA. The Jews were really clever in utilizing this event to sustain Palestine. They convinced the
world that they are the population that was labored throughout history; and all they are asking for is
to live peacefully in their holly land. Furthermore, many of the six

Israel 's Impact On The West Bank
Israel has made travel between major Palestinian population centers (Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah,
Bethlehem, and Hebron) in the West Bank easier over the last several years. Several major
checkpoints in the West Bank that restricted direct movement between and into these cities have
been removed or modified. However, in general this opening is less the result of an overall easing in
movement restrictions than the result of the institutionalization of movement controls into a formal
and permanent regime of restrictions that has replaced roadblocks with gates that can be opened and
closed at the whim of the military and that has reconfiguring how Palestinians travel.
According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
While Palestinian movement is severely restricted, a separate system of roads that are closed to
Palestinians or that bypass Palestinian communities has been set up for Settlers to ensure their
unrestricted movement in the West Bank and between the West Bank and Israel.[iii] According to
the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem,
"there were 67 kilometers of roads in the West Bank that Israel classified for the sole, or practically
sole, use of Israelis, first and foremost of settlers. Israel also prohibits Palestinians from even
crossing some of these roads with vehicles, thereby restricting their access to nearby roads that they
are ostensibly not prohibited from using. In these cases, Palestinians travelers have to get out of
their vehicle, cross the road on foot, and find an alternative mode of transportation on the other
side."[iv]
OCHA has also reported that in 2013 at least 55 West Bank communities which are home to more
than 180,000 people remain completely isolated as a result of roadblocks, barriers, checkpoints and
other movement restrictions. All of the main roads into and out of these communities remain
blocked and residents wishing to leave these communities must use alternative routes that are two to
five times longer than the blocked direct routes. Many

The Arab Israeli Palestinian Conflict
The Middle East has long been home to very deep–rooted conflict. For too long, the citizens of the
Middle East have lived in the central of death and fear. The animosity between few, takes the hope
of hundreds. The Arab–Israeli–Palestinian conflict is most notably the largest issue preventing peace
in the Middle East, but it is by no means the only issue. The issue of bankrolling and foreign aid are
also issues preventing peace; because the U.S provides so much funding and foreign aid to certain
countries, it is in some sense encouraging them to continue acting the way they act now and not
change for the better of the region. It is also making the U.S look biased and can potentially cause
issues for America in the long run, if they haven't already. There is also the conflict of the Persian
Gulf; the importance of these "new" resources and how it could affect the world economy and also
the balancing of powers in the Persian Gulf; The U.S and the Middle Eastern nations will need to
work to together to bring about security and stability into the Persian Gulf and hopefully it can
overflow to the Middle East as well.
ISRAELI–PALESTINIAN CONFLICTS
President George W. Bush in his June 24, 2002 address to the nation said this: "The conflict between
Israel and Palestine is just one of the many facets that have shaped modern day politics in the
Middle East. It is a conflict rooted in generations of violence, discrimination and prejudice that is
complicated by a history older

The Arab Israeli Conflict
My chosen subteam for this negotiation is based on a Fundamentalist Christians opinion. As I had
the chance to learn previously, Christians fully support the relocation of Jews in this conflict. This is
because one of the main roots of the Arab–Israeli Conflict starts by the Movement of Zionism. The
Bible is interpreted by many religions in many different ways, however the Christian Zionists belief
in a series of Biblical Philosophies and Prophecies. Some of this prophecies are events that have
already happened, but they usually follow a series of chronological steps in order to end with a final
prophecy that comes true and leads to a major event. The Christian Bible says that once the Jews
relocate back in Jerusalem (also called their Holy Land), Jesus will descend to Earth for a Second
Time to judge the living and the dead, finally building his Eternal Kingdom.
Perhaps, there is a belief that the Jewish Population was not as tangent about this conflict before. It
was not until the Zionist Christians influenced them with their beliefs, explaining them about said
Biblical Prophecies that this unleashed a series of thoughts and feelings triggered by said powerful
words, making the Jewish people thrive the retake or relocation to their Holy Land. Thus all of this
thoughts were brought up before the conflict began, they still remain alive in the heads of many
Jewish individuals nowadays.
For many years, there have been numerous attempts to come up with different solutions to

The Israeli and Palestinian Conflict
The Israeli and Palestinian conflict has been an unwavering conflict that has plagued the world for
longer than any can remember. I, myself am hopelessly torn on whether I am Pro–Palestine, or Pro–
Israel. I find it difficult to make an informed and unbiased decision on the conflict with the two
conflicting stories being relayed by the pro–Israel documentary as well as by the Pro–Palestine
documentary. I feel as though it would be impossible for me to make a decision on the issue unless I
was able to see for myself. I see both sides of the issue, and I sympathize with both sides on
different points. The two documentaries that were shown were very different, telling conflicting
stories, and representing the conflict differently which led me to formulate an unclear opinion. The
first documentary: Democracy's Outpost the Case for Israel, seemed a very biased documentary in
favor of Israel. It didn't have actual evidence of their point of view, rather stated their opinions
without any evidence to support it. The documentary in support of Palestine, seemed to have more
evidence of the view points it was supporting.The people that are in favor of Israel claim that Israel
has given Palestine their chance to have an independent state multiple times. Dershowitz, the main
voice of the documentary, claims that Palestine had been given a chance to have their own
independent state multiple times. In 1938 they were offered about 80% of what is now Israel, and
the people of Israel only

The First Arab-Israeli War
After some Arab–Israeli conflict, the Arab countries requested and threatened the U.S. encourage
Israel to find peace, and Richard Nixon should have submitted to their requests because of the
ability for the Arab countries to have oil cutbacks, make price increases and put an Oil Embargo on
the U.S.
The long lasting tension between the Arab countries and Israel led to the first and second Arab–
Israeli war, however, it made King Faisal of Saudi Arabia want to try and have peace with Israel. In
1948 and 1949, during the first Arab–Israeli war, the pipeline, that had Iraqi oil, was cut off on its
way to Haifa. The Arabian pipeline was also delayed during this war which hurt the Middle East and
Their oil profits. Another event was in 1956 during ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On live television Nixon said, "oil without a market, as Dr. Mossadegh learnt many, many years
ago, doesn't do much good.... We and Europe are the market... if they continue to up the price they
will lose the markets." Later, Nixon sent Secretary of State John Irwin to three of the main oil
producing countries in the Middle East: Iran, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. According to State
Department Spokesman, John F. King, Irwin was going to give the three rulers of each country, one
of which was Faisal, a letter from Nixon expressing his concerns with what could transpire. Irwin
was sent to try and persuade the countries to not do anything too rash and discuss ideas that could be
of common interest. Although, some realized that the three countries Irwin visited were the most
conservative out of all the countries in OPEC as well as the ones to have the most economic and
political ties to the U.S. This was seen to some as an attempt to try and break up OPEC countries.
Obviously neither of these approaches worked as the countries stayed together and Faisal was not
too worried about Nixon's threats. Instead, he emphasized his earlier threats by saying they would
take action if the U.S. did not get the Israel troops out of Arab land. Other people, such as Zaki
Yamani, Saudi oil minister and James Akins, a US ambassador, warned that Saudi may very well
cutback their oil.

The Egyptian Arab Israeli Conflict
Introduction: In just 25 years, 5 wars were started with 11492 Israeli and 55300 Arabs deaths
costing the countries not only millions of dollars but also the loss of life and peace. The Arab–Israeli
conflict began in 1948 when Israel declared itself an independent nation after the 2nd world war.
Even as Egypt and the Middle East fought off colonialism and foreign enemies they still managed to
keep a constant stream of war between themselves. The dictionary definition of a hero is, a man
admired for his achievements and noble qualities and/or one who shows great courage. Showing
courage and noble qualities can be taken to mean many things, the most perfect definition I believe
is a person who stands up for what they believe and puts the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
the Suez Canal but France, England and Israel attack and occupy the area
This battle is left unresolved because there is no treaty and France, England and Israel withdraw
because of international pressures (America)
Egypt 's ability to resist outside pressures made them a hero in the Arab world and of nonaligned
countries
The battle of 1956 made Egypt the leading "nonaligned" country and Nassar gave voice to the
desires of undeveloped & post colonial societies
Trying to modernize
The six–day war of 1967 was an Israeli attack on Egypt, Jordan and Syria
Israel gains much Arab territory
There was no treaty at the end of this war only a cease–fire
Israel was extremely successful in these wars in large part due to the fact that America was
supplying most of their weapons and money
As Anwar al–Sadat said, "America is Israel's Lifeblood."
Through all these wars the Arabs never lost hope that they would win and banded together in unity
against Israel; this idea is called Pan Arabism
Pan Arabism is, "The nationalist notion of cultural unity among Arab countries"
The origins of this idea are from the 19th and 20th centuries increased literacy in the Middle East
that lead to a renaissance among Arab Nations
This renaissance also lead to independence from the Ottoman Empire (1918) and the British
Colonists
Another event that spurred this idea to its climax was the foundation of the Arab League in 1945
The peak time of Pan Arabism happened under Nassar in Egypt
He was the charismatic

Israeli Palestine Conflict
During World War II, the Palestinian leadership actively supported the Nazi party (Beinin). The
israeli–Palestine conflict is one of the longest ongoing conflicts throughout history dating all the
way back to 3,000 years of conflict between these two very different cultures, and the land they live
on. Even though the Palestinian death toll has been unfortunately very high throughout this ongoing
conflict, Israel must and should take necessary action to defend itself from the Palestinian terrorism,
and Israel has done everything in its power to bring a peaceful end to this seemingly never–ending
conflict. The ethical differences that are brought up during the Israeli–Palestine conflict are one of
the leading causes of why this conflict never ends and, why Israel must take action against Palestine.
In the latest conflict between these two, Israel has always taken multiple steps to make sure that
civilian casualties are kept to a minimum. Some examples of Israel's efforts to limit ... Show more
Israelis who practice Judaism and Zionism are constantly being persecuted by Palestinians who
practice a radical form of Islam. Zionism is based on the principle that the Jewish people move to
their homeland, which is present day Israel, and this has led to the main disagreement of these two
very different cultures (Reiter). While some Palestinians are practicing a radical form of Islam that
is very anti–Semitic towards western culture and religion such as Judaism. They use this belief of
radical Islam so that they can justify and continue their terrorist activities against innocent civilians.
The Israelis religion of Judaism and Zionism have been peacefully practiced throughout history,
however the same cannot be said for Islam, because the Palestine leadership and terrorist have
continually used their belief of Islam as a scapegoat for their barbaric actions against the Jewish
people

Five Broken Cameras
Imagine living in a conflict that has divided two nations, literally, by a concrete barrier. This
turbulent and heated confrontation has left many dead and even more injured. Welcome to the
Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The documentary "5 Broken Cameras" is a portrayal of this modern day
dispute through the personal lens of self–taught Palestinian cameraman, Emad Burnat. This
compelling documentary provides a realistic presentation of the hatred that surrounds these two
divided nations. Movie viewers will be drawn to this film is because it demonstrates the harsh
realities of what it is like to live in the midst of a conflict and how the lives of those affected are
altered as a result of this prolonged struggle. Burnat is certainly effective ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Rather, it demonstrates the first hand effects of families who have lived through travesty and
hardship. By connecting the increased intensity of the conflict and displaying it alongside Gibreel's
growth, the audience is quickly drawn in and engaged in the film. Burnat successfully draws this
parallel in order to hit his message close to home and make sure that it sticks. His message is as
follows: The political crisis that unites and separates these two distinct cultures is not necessarily
bound to be resolved soon, however, during the midst of this crisis, it is more than just politics that
needs to be exemplified and understood. Life needs to go

Israel 's International Affairs : A Major Issue Of Social...
Despite all of the focus on Israel's international affairs, ranging from relations with the United
States, persistent conflicts with Palestine, and back and forths with Iran, Israel has a major issue of
social inequality within their nation. Despite narrowing the number of Israelis in poverty and raising
incomes in recent years, Inequality in Israel is still one of the highest of the Western developed
countries. According to a report released by the Organization for Economic Co–operation and
Development, 18.6% of Israelis live beneath the poverty line, which can be defined as those who
earn less than 50% of Israel's median national income. Meanwhile, the top 10%, much to the
chagrin of politicians like Bernie Sanders, were taking in nearly 36% of the Israel's income while
the bottom 10% were pulling less than 2%. Therefore, I believe that for Israel's economy to grow,
the country must focus on addressing the rampant inequality that their citizens face. The more
people that earn more, the better off the nation will be as a whole. One of the most common and
popular statistics to look at when discussing inequality is the famous Gini coefficient. Despite
Israel's Gini coefficient dropping from .371 in 2007 to .360 in 2013, the country still ranks much
closer to the "1" mark than most developed nations. It is important to note that Israel's issue of
income inequality does not stem simply from policies enacted by the current and former
administrations, but rather a cultural

The Settlement Of The Israeli Essay
The settlement of the Israeli started with the ideology of Zionism, which is to found a Jewish–
majority nation that serves as the safe heaven for all Jewish identifying population over the world,
in its most sacred place: the father land. After the long battle against anti–Semitism and the most
traumatic experience of the Holocaust, the Jewish population was compelled to find a nation that it
would provide a safe place; such sentiment and obligation to the both physical and social survival of
the population is sound and legitimate. However, Israel, as a nation, is in a tough spot: geologically,
it is located in the Middle East, sitting on what used to be considered Palestinian territory; due to the
Diaspora, new–not wholly new, but post–Diaspora new–groups settled in the region, and the
founding of the nation is inherently in conflict with the both settler's right to live. Due to the Middle
Easternism and its hostility to the West and the Israelites originating from the West in concept [sic],
Israel's fundamental existence is threatened (Drake, ). As a result, whereas the Palestine–Israel
conflict is situated in post–Cold War era that marks the decline in the physical military front, the
foreign policy of Israel for the most part still adopts classical concept of security; alas, Israeli
government always tried to incorporate human security concerns to be dealt during the peace
processes with surrounding Middle Eastern countries, however short, which shows that the Israeli

The Importance Of Policing In Israel
"Lessons from empirical research on policing in Israel: policing terrorism and police–community
relationships" by Perry, S., & Jonathan–Zamir, T. (2014), was an article set out to review empirical
research on police–community relations in Israel regarding policing terrorism. The goal of the study
was to find insights to improve the impact counter–terrorism has on the community in Israel and
other democratic nations that face similar issues when actively using counter–terrorism tactics.
Much of the data from the articles used in this review were gathered from the Israel National Police
(INP), which is the only police force in Israel, which may weaken the statistics gathered due to
government agencies not having accurate data. This is an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In Israel, the Arabs were the ones, especially unhappy with the police due to the hostile and
militaristic treatment from the police. The article outlines different ways to possibly mitigate these
issues. First, the police should focus on fairness when treating citizens, as well as focus on
traditional police, not just counter–terrorism. There was very little this article cited on the
effectiveness of specific strategies and empirical studies in Israel have been lacking on this subject,
this is due to the sensitive nature of the information regarding counter–terrorism.
When comparing the legitimacy framework for Israel and other western nations, including the
United States they all share similar important factors for police legitimacy including procedural
justice and fairness of the process. In Israel the amount of people who see the process as fair, the
amount of neutrality and transparency, the respect police give, and the ability to participate have
been lacking. This is largely due to the increased amount of counter–terrorism in recent time,
especially during the Intifada and other uprisings. The amount of community policing in Israel was
found to be weak. The Israeli police should consider increasing the implementation of community
policing to improve community trust and support.
Research has shown that the relations between the police and Israeli Arabs can be increased as well
as

Israelis Immigration to Canada
Purpose and Overview
Group rationale
From 2003 to 2012, more than 43,000 Israelis immigrated to Canada as new residents, students, and
workers (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2012). Similarly to other immigrants, Israeli
newcomers tend to populate and reside in large metropolitan cities, such as Toronto. As the majority
of immigrants fall under the "family class" category (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2012), it
is expected that children and adolescents that are part of immigrant families are affected by this life
transition. This proposal will outline a counselling group for Israeli adolescents who had recently
immigration and now reside in the Greater Toronto Area.
New immigrants expect and usually face numerous challenges prior to and after arriving at their
new home country. A recent comprehensive review of the health of immigrant youth in Canada
revealed that immigrant youth experiences stress as they leave familiar settings behind and struggle
to acculturate to their new country of residence (Salehi, 2010). Research has shown that immigrant
youth have higher rates of mental health issues related to negative migration expeirences. In
addition, immgirants are at an increased risk for secondary school dropout as they face greater
obstacles compared to native youh in academic success (Anisef, Brown, Phythian, Sweet, &
Walters, 2010). Thus, there is a need to aid immigrant youth in its transition and assimilation
process to reduce the likelihood of negative

Israeli People Conspiracy Theories
It is often believed that people have used animals to do different tasks. Today we are going to look
at some conspiracy theories about the Israeli people and how they used animals to do their dirty
work. It is believed that the Israeli people have use animals from different species. Some of the
species are; birds, mammals, and reptiles. People have become suspicious of these animals released
by the Israeli government. The Israeli people have been accused of using lizards to spy on nuclear
programs. A former chief of the Iran military, Hassan Firuzabadi, said the military used lizards
because they "attract atomic waves." People have also accused Israelis of using dolphins, equipped
with cameras and killer arrows. A few years ago in 2015, an

The Birth Right Program Essay example
As a Jewish student there is a program available to go to Israel for a summer, if you have never been
before and experience it first hand. It is called the "Birth Right Program." The trip is free, the only
thing you have to pay for is the round trip plane ticket and any souvenirs you may buy. While you
are there with the other students just like yourself, you experience different places like the Wailing
Wall and the city of Jerusalem, as well as different Israeli holidays including Shabbat every Friday
night. I have contemplated going on the Birth Right trip for a few years now. To have the chance to
experience first hand a culture that I really only know through stories and history books ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their small ceremonies and everyday practices serve to reiterate and substantiate their beliefs and
customs (Gibson). Israel has a very high standard of living. Many people in rural areas of Israel live
in collective communities. Members of these communities share food and property. They also
exchange labor for medical care (Davis). In the United States, "Individualism is the economic realm
manifests itself in the belief that individuals, not communities in which they live, determine their
own economical outcomes" (Davis). An individualist solution to poverty is not more government
spending on welfare programs and charities, but greater individual effort by those on the bottom to
improve their incomes. Individuals themselves deserve the credit and/or blame for their economic
fortune or misfortune, while collectivists do not agree with this theory at all.
As the United States is very individualistic, it is also distinctively masculine, while Israel, once
again found in the center of the scale is more feminine. The two characteristics go hang in hand.
High masculinity believes in achievement and judging individuals on their performance, just as
individualist cultures do. Feminine cultures believe more in life choices and equality between the
sexes is normal. It is made clear that both feminine and masculine qualities

The War On Israeli Occupation
War is generally considered a to be a heinous act, a harbinger of death, destruction and disaster. War
is often fought for ignorant reasons such as wealth and property, although defence and fighting for
the greater good is often exhibited through history. Its facile to claim that war is unjustifiable under
personal or political reasons, or that it's a waste of human life and that passive resistance is the key.
Nevertheless, in opposition, there are particular circumstances in which war is justifiable. Examples
of this are: Under international bodies of law (Geneva and Haug conventions), the principals of the
'just war theory' which is in stark contrast to 2 other approaches on the concept of war, being
'Pacifism' and 'Realism', as well as Islamic reasoning on the conduct, "darurah" (necessity) and
justifications of initiating or continuing conflict as well as theoretical and historical understandings
of what it means for a war to be just. An ongoing example being the war on Israeli occupation by
the Palestinians, another example being the British interference in the Second World War against the
belligerent Nazi regime. Although, in retrospect, the Second World War is also used in pacifist
ideologies, against war justification. Various academic enumerations interpret and apply the
renowned "just war Theory" including Peter S.Temes's "The just war: an American reflection on the
morality of war in our times as well as discussions on the Islamic etiquettes of war in Youssef H.

The Prospect Of A Two State Nation Solution For Israel...
The Israel–Palestine conflict is one of the most long–term, pressing, and largely confounding social,
political, and national quandaries of our age. Since we have been moving with surprising velocity
into the vast horizons of globalization, the conflict has built up tremendous momentum and has
called into question the adequacy of our current attempts at coming to a peaceful resolution that can
simultaneously and successfully address both sides of the struggle. The purpose of this paper has
been to understand the prospect of a two–state nation solution for Israel and Palestine. The
discussion arises a retrospective view of the context behind the present analysis. We begin with a
discourse that informs the reader of the historical narrative between the Jewish inhabitants of Israel
and the Palestinians who also seek to live in the lands which comprise Israel. At the forefront of the
discussion are some key issues such as trends in Israeli settlement expansion over time, the manner
in which these settlements create political challenges towards the prospect of a two–state solution,
and the fragmentation of power within Palestinian political parties which inhibit the opportunity for
proper negotiations amongst the two parties. Finally, we delve into a discussion on nationalism, it's
importance in the discussion of a two–state solution, and the challenges posed when trying to
formulate US Foreign Policy towards the matter.
(Part A) R.B.G.
The scope of Israeli settlement activity

Constructed Functionalism
"How will your family react, if they find out how you spend your nights here?" said Gil. Isn't it true
that as a free individual, Nimr has every right to pursue the sexual orientation that makes him feel
most comfortable? Isn't it true that Abir should choose the man she is in love with and not the man
chosen by her family? Isn't it true that Gil's discovery of Nabil's cache of guns is only one small step
towards preventing a shooting war between Israelis and West Bank Palestinians and regrettably
gives credence to the hard measures he takes?
In this paper, it will be shown that the Deconstructed functionalist and Marxist perspectives are
correct. Deconstructed functionalist and Marxist argue that the love between Nimr and Roy is
genuine ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although there is some value to the Deconstructed social constructionist interpretation, it contains
several weaknesses. The following review of some aspects of the plot will reveal some of those
weaknesses. According to Rauch, identity politics is defined as anything that concerns a person's
identity which therefore includes a person's race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Steve Bannon
states that since the Democrats fixate the majority of their time on identity politics, this will be the
reason why they will end up losing voters because they are not focussing on the "real issues" such as
economic nationalism. In other words, Steve Bannon's arguments explain why Donald Trump was
elected and this ideology that he presents states that there is only one race; the white race and this
creates white consciousness. Identity politics plays a huge role in the movie Out in the Dark because
the main protagonists, Nimr and Roy, both have identities that conflict with the reality that they live
in: one

The Arab/Israeli Conflict
The Arab Israeli conflict.
The Arab/Israeli conflict is a conflict between the Arabs and the Jews over a small piece of land
known as the holy land which is an area in the Middle East of the Arab world. The Arabs call the
land Palestine, the Jews call it Israel but both religions have strong religious links with the land.
There is conflict between the two religions because they both believe that the land belongs to them.
it all started back in 135 AD when the Jews were expelled from they're homeland in Palestine
causing them too spread out across Europe creating the Diaspora. Although the jews had been
forced to leave the homeland they never lost their identity as jews and still longed too return to their
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
in 1918 britain aided by the arabs captured palestine from the the ottoman turks but britain had now
made too many promises that hey couldn't keep . Many Arabs opposed British troops because of
England's failure to fulfill its promise and were also getting angry about the increase of jewish
migrating to palestine. Arabs became concerned that Jewish immigration would threaten their
position in Palestine which lead to large scale attacks on the jews. At the time of Hitler's dictatorship
in Germany, Jewish immigration increased dramatically in 1933. An Arab revolt started which
Britain suppressed with the help of Zionist militias. Zionist settlements climaxed in 1936. In 1947,
Britain forbid Jewish refugees from nazi concentration camps to land in Palestine to prevent war
between Jews and Arabs, which resulted in worldwide criticism of Britain. Britain withdrew itself
from the situation handing over the mandate over Palestine, leaving the United Nations to deal with
the situation. The United Nations proposed that Palestine was divided into two states, one for the
Arabs and one for the Jews, however the Arabs opposed this idea claiming that the UN plan allotted
too much territory to the Jews. the arabs thought it was unfair that the jews should get more land
because the arabs were by far the larger population but because of the holocaust the was a lot of
sympathy for the jews and this may be why the got more land.
On May 14th 1948 Israel became

The Israeli-Palestinian Terrorist Attacks
The attack began on September 5, 1972, and involved eight Palestinian terrorists. The terrorists
invaded the Olympic Village, killing two members of the Israeli team and taking an addition nine
other Israelis athletes as hostages in an attempt to bargain for the release of over 230 Palestinian
prisoners in Israeli jails. Following the abduction, all nine athletes, along with five terrorists and a
German policeman, died in a botched rescue attempt (History.com Staff, 2009). I think that this
event is considered significant for a number of reasons. The first is that the Olympics were a
globally televised event with an estimated 1 billion people view the games. This made the terrorist
attack and the events that subsequently ensured, one of the most globally viewed terrorist events of
that time period. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It demonstrated that these problems were not geographically confined and that the targets of the
terrorist's discontent can include innocent bystanders. The failed rescue, that resulted in the death of
all the hostages, helped identify significant deficiencies in security tactics, techniques, and
procedures used during hostage events and highlighted several specific issues in Germanys response
force that ultimately lead to the death of the hostages due to miscommunication and lack of proper
training in extreme

The Israeli-Arab Wars
Israeli–Arab wars basically refer to a series of conflict between Israel and some Arab states. These
wars have been complicated or heightened by a list of factors linked to strategic, political, and
economic interests in the regions of the great powers. In some occasions, people refer to the Israeli–
Arab wars as hostilities caused by religious differences between Jews and Muslims (Quandt, 2013).
Nonetheless, this paper will analyze one of the Israeli–Arab wars, the 1967 War also known as the
Six–Day War, based on facts like its primary cause, the countries involved, the overall strategy for
each side, as well as the state which achieved military victory. Additionally, the primary battle of
this conflict, its overall end result, and the reasons for selecting the Six–Day War will also be
covered.
Cause of the Six–Day War and the Countries Involved The Six–Day War started in June 1967, and
was fought within a period of six days; between 5th June and 10th June. The primary cause of this
war was the dramatic intensification of the tension between Israel and its Arab neighboring states
during the mid–1960s. It's imperative to note that the tension had its own triggers, one being the
Israel's policy of diverting water down to Negev Desert from the Jordan River. Basically, this move
angered the Arab countries, particularly Syria, Egypt and Jordan (Quandt, 2013). Israel got involved
in the war because of the tension caused by the terrorist activity against its land which had

Issues Between Palestine and Israelis
Issues that continue to block peace between Palestinians and Israelis
The issue of Palestine and Israel is one that has been hotly contested for over a thousand years. The
last fifty years have been especially important in the history of the Jewish people and Palestinians.
Since the death of Yasser Arafat on the 11th of November 2004, and the election of Mahmoud
Abbas as his successor as leader of the Palestinian Authority, significant steps have been taken
towards a lasting peace. This will hopefully lead to a conclusion of the second Palestinian intifada,
which began in late September 2000, and to an end of the oppression of the Palestinian people by
the Israeli Defense Forces. Both Jews and Arabs have suffered heavily from the ... Show more
Only around 20% of the existing Arab population remained within the new state of Israel. The
population of Israel doubled within the first year of formation as a result of Holocaust survivors who
no longer felt comfortable living in their existing homelands, and Jewish immigrants from Arab
countries.
War broke out between Israel and its Arab neighbors (Egypt, Syria and Jordan) on June 5th 1967.
Israel successfully defeated the Arab forces after just six days and as a result of the short–lived war,
Israel gained control of the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights.
The newly conquered territory increased the size of Israel by a factor of four and placed one million
more Arabs under the control of Israel. In addition to the Arabs under Israeli control, one million
Arab refugees were created to join the refugee camps in neighboring countries. The 1967 war had
huge political significance. Israel showed the world that it was able to defend its territory and that it
was able, and prepared to launch strategic strikes that could result in gaining territory and upsetting
the balance in the region. The Arab nations did not appear to learn strategic lessons. They launched
a third war in 1973 in the hope of regaining their territory lost to Israel, but they were able to adjust
their military techniques, and so were hopeful that they would be more successful in future conflicts
against the Jewish state.
On holiest day in the Jewish calendar,

The Book Of Amos By The Minor Prophet Amos
The book of Amos, written by the minor prophet Amos, is found towards the end of the Old
Testament of the Bible. The book of Amos is God's message to His people to repent and reform, as
He is angered by the Israelite's unfaithfulness, perversion and distortion of religion. This period in
Israel's history highlights the nation's ignorance, unfaithfulness and disregard of God's authority; the
nation had already blatantly ignored the forewarnings of other minor prophets beforehand. The first
four chapters are a warning of judgment, which the Israelites knew was coming. The passage of
Amos 5 is the climax of the text, and is the epitome of God's intervention expressed as a passionate
warning and emotive lamentation. Amos establishes that God ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Amos utilises the imagery of Israel 'as though a man fled from a lion' to portray the character of God
as a mighty and ferocious power in the symbolism of a lion. Furthermore, the lion simile
embellishes God's authority in the text and demands a strong presence in the dynamics of the text.
Similarly, in verse 6, Amos expresses that God shall 'break out like a fire', again using a symbol of
the ferocity of nature to express God's fury. Amos uses strong emotive language in verse 21, as God
speaks to Israel saying that He 'hates', 'despises' and 'rejects' their supposedly religious actions;
Amos is highlighting to the audience the rich emotion and the extent of anger that God is projecting
unto Israel, as God rarely expresses what He loathes unless administering judgment. The repeated
themes of despair, destruction and darkness in the text foreshadow the downfall Israel would surely
meet as a result of their actions. The author's use of prophetic woe emphasise the purpose of the text
– a warning of judgement and an emotive lamentation for the people of Israel.
Amos 5 centres majorly on God's disdain for the Israelites shallow religious ceremonies and
practices. During the era of Amos 5, the worship of God (or Yahweh) encompassed many strict
religious practices and ceremonies, including prayer, festivals and sacrifices. Amos describes God's
hatred for these practices, as the Israelites have deterred from true

Arab-Israeli Conflict Essay
Arab–Israeli Conflict During the First World War (1914–1918), Britain met with problems
concerning promises made, yet not being kept. Britain, knowing that it needed all the help it could
get against the German allies, promised land to people who desperately wanted it. However, as it
was revealed Britain had no intention of honouring their word. The first promise to be made was to
the Arabs, in a desperate attempt to overpower one of the countries the British were fighting; the
Turks. The Arab leader, Sherif Hussein, agreed to help defeat the Turks, on the condition that at the
end of the war, the Arabs would get their freedom. The British accepted the terms, and in 1915 it
was written up in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was, like the McMahon letter to the Arabs, promising the Jews ownership of Palestine. This
was, made at a time when Britain was having many problems fighting the allies, and needed all the
help they could find. There are a few reasons why historians believe this letter was issued. It was
thought that the Jews in America and Russia had a lot of money and power, and so would therefore
encourage their governments to continue in the war. There was sympathy for the Zionists, as the
leaders like Balfour knew that the Jews had endured a lot of hardship, and suffered many injustices,
and so saw this promise as a chance to right some of the wrongs committed. Britain used the Suez
Canal, in Egypt. However, it was right next door to Palestine, and so it would greatly benefit Britain
if the people who governed the neighbouring Palestine, were friendly towards Britain and their
interests. The new leader of the Zionists, Chaim Weizmann, was a friend of a few leading politicians
such as Balfour and the present Prime minister, Lloyd George. It is quite probable that the British
Government had no idea of the changes that this Declaration would cause on the short and long–
term effects on the problems between the Arabs and the Jews. The consequences of these unkept
promises were quite terrible for Britain, making their situation in Europe much worse. The Arabs

Jewish Folk Dance As A Means Of Creating A New Israeli...
Jewish national identity was colonized when Jewish people were forced out of ancient Israel and
dispersed to various different nations. Anti–Semitism was one of the principle means for this
colonization because it made it dangerous for Jewish people to express their own national identity in
the European nations they dispersed to. As a result, certain traditions, like Jewish folk dance, which
were not codified, were lost. Jewish folk dance also disappeared because folk traditions are strongly
connected to the land in which they originated and the majority of Jews left Israel. Furthermore,
because of the third commandant of the Torah, Jews were not allowed to depict images of their
dance. Consequently, their traditional dance was lost forever. However, when the Jews returned to
Israel in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they found it important to recreate traditions like folk
dance to reassert their fractured nationhood after so many years of diaspora. Thus, Israeli folk dance
was a means of creating a new Israeli culture.
Israeli folk dance was created by using elements from other dance cultures with themes and music
of modern Israel. In this paper, I will argue that while anti–Semitism resulted in the colonization of
Jewish national identity, women re–created Israeli folk dance as a means to establish a new Jewish
identity, as well as an identity for themselves. By focusing on Romania and Yemen, we will identify
the vestiges of colonialism in Israeli folk dance, and

Displacement And Delay Of Photography
Displacement and Delay in Photography
"Photography endows place with a certain freedom, liberating place from the commitment to a
specific point in time and space, exposing some generic dimension that exists there, enables place to
be a 'sort of place' (...)." Taking into account the sentence of Miki Kratsman, I would like to present
his photographs entitled Territory and the way in which they relate to the concepts of space and
time. First, it is necessary to emphasize that the author, born in Argentina and later having
immigrated to Israel, during his career has often documented the difficult Israeli–Palestinian
situation. Moreover, his interest in reporting from this area of conflict is significant since he appears
as "one of the few Israeli journalists who still cross the border today" The project "Territory" was
realized in 2005, seven months before the evacuation of Israeli settlements present in the South of
the Gaza Strip. Thus, the photos do not show the direct conflict between two populations or what
remains of a place tormented by war, on the contrary, they exhibit a zone, an agglomerate of houses
and lives about to disappear forever. Although when Kratzman has reached Gush Katif only a small
part of the inhabitants has already left their home, what emerges through the images is a feeling of
absolute desolation and emptiness. Therefore, despite its being populated, this piece of land seems
to be

A Relationship Based On Paternalism And Condescension...
What was once a relationship based on paternalism and condescension between Ashkenazi and
Mizrahi Jews has gradually transformed into a more leveled socioeconomic platform between the
two ethnic groups. The Jews of Ashkenazi descent, mainly from Eastern European countries and
Britain, arrived in the decades before the creation of the State of Israel and were able to rapidly
create a new society. Shortly after Israel's independence, massive waves of Jewish immigrants
flooded the country, of which a large part were Mizrahim Jews from North Africa and the Middle
East fleeing discrimination in Arab lands. The dominant Ashkenazim viewed the incoming Mizrahi
Jews as backwards and burdensome to the newly–founded country's cultural and economic image
and took measures to make them conform to their customs. This process of conditioning ultimately
led to a wide socioeconomic gap between the two groups that prompted political clashes and riots.
Recent trends and changes in the country's political structure have narrowed the gap and point
toward equal opportunities between Mizrahi Jews and Ashkenazi Jews.
Originating in Europe, Zionism was embedded with Western–leaning principles that aimed at
coalescing the Jews of the Diaspora into one unified and modernized Jewish identity within Israel.
When it was introduced to the old Yishuv, it reflected the Ashkenazim political and cultural values,
including "liberal democracy and national self–determination" and therefore assured their success

The Arab Israeli Conflict Essay
According to an apocryphal story, Pope John Paul once said that he believes there are two possible
solutions to the Arab–Israeli conflict, the realistic and the miraculous. The realistic being divine
intervention, and the miraculous being a voluntary agreement by both parties. On September 13th,
1993, it looked like the miraculous had happened when the Oslo Accords were signed by Israeli
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat
on the White House South Lawn. However, the objectives of the historic accords were never fully
implemented and the Palestinians remain a stateless nation. Further steps toward Israeli–Arab peace,
including the Cairo Agreement, Oslo II and the Camp David Summit, have fallen short of the goals
of both parties.
When he became president in 1993, Bill Clinton and his advisors did not initially make Israeli–
Palestinian peace a priority. The administration looked first to other Middle Eastern affairs,
believing that an Israeli–Syrian agreement was more likely, and that the policy of "dual
containment" in Iran and Iraq was more pressing. They thought that once they made a breakthrough
between Israel and Syria the Lebanese would be close behind, and that this would put pressure on
the Iran and Iraq, the biggest opponents of any sort of Israeli–Arab peace deal (US Office of the
Historian). The Americans were made aware of the secret negotiations that had begun in Oslo in
December 1992 between the

The Arab-Israeli War

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Crystal Williams

More from Crystal Williams (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Arab-Israeli War