The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
Business Law 3
1. VII The Tort of Negligence
Privacy
Human Rights
SWOT
Review
NAIT Bus Law
April 2, 2006
Part 3
1
2. Tort Law Pg 19
A: A civil wrong (between individuals)
When an intentional or careless act harms
another
Injured party usually sues for monetary
compensation
B: Purpose to compensate victim
C: to determine liability
– person at fault pays
– Strict liability – did act reasonably
– Vicarious liability
2
3. Torts p 19
Because Torts is a "common law” (court
developed) area of liability, it requires
judges to interpret and apply earlier
precedents.
Torts is still very much a live subject
For example, they have created new areas
of liability for negligent statements and
financial loss, or for car accidents when
automobile was invented
3
4. Liability for businesses p 19
Directly
Indirectly
Careful HR practices, hiring, training,
performance appraisals
See Rylands v Fletcher case p1 (case handout)
4
5. Categories of Tort pg 20
Intentional or Careless or
deliberate acts negligent acts
that cause that cause
injury or loss injury or loss
On purpose Accidental or
unintentional
5
6. Intentional Torts pg 20
Intentional conduct that causes injury
Examples
– Assault and Battery
– Trespass to Land
– False Imprisonment
– Nuisance
– Defamation
Courts may award punitive damages
6
7. Intentional Torts pg 20
Assault and Battery
– Assault - where there is fear of
contact
– Battery - least touching in
anger
Defenses
1. Consent (informed)
2. Self-defense (reasonable
force)
R. v McSorley (case handout)
7
8. Trespass on Land pg 21
entering another’s land
without authority
– permission implied for business
offering public services
Occupier owes only minimal
duty to trespasser
Continuing trespass remedied
by injunction
8
9. False Imprisonment pg 22
The unlawful and Restraint may be
intentional restraint justified if the
of a person against trespassing person
his/her will has done something
Restraint must be s/he can be arrested
total for – ie robbery
Victim must submit
or be forced to
comply
9
10. Private Nuisance pg 22
Private nuisance interferes with
another’s use of his/her property
Interference must involve unusual
activity
10
11. Defamation pg 22
A false statement about someone to his
detriment - must be published or broadcast
Slander - spoken defamation
Libel - written defamation
Note the innuendo
11
12. Defamation/2
Defences
1. Truth (Justification)
2. Absolute Privilege
3. Qualified Privilege
4. Fair Comment
But mistake is no defence
12
14. Negligence pg 23
Inadvertent, careless conduct that
causes injury to another
Important area of tort liability for
professionals
14
15. Negligence A – D pg 24
Essential Elements:
A: A duty to exercise care
B: Breach of the standard of care
C: Causation – The act caused the
injury
D: Damages -Victim suffered a loss
15
16. Reasonable Person Test
Reasonable person is a prudent person
exercising care
– conduct falling between
average and perfect
– Like par in golf
16
17. Is a Duty Owed?
Reasonable Foreseeability Test
- If it would be apparent to a prudent person that
the conduct was likely to cause injury - duty is
owed.
We owe a duty to anyone we can
reasonably anticipate might be harmed by
our conduct
17
18. A - Duty of Care
Misfeasance
– an act that causes harm to another
– court will provide remedy
Nonfeasance
– a failure to prevent an injury
– courts reluctant to provide remedy
If a person attempts to help there is a duty to exercise
reasonable care
Courts reluctant to provide remedy without special
relationship
18
19. B – Breach of a Standard of Conduct
What would a reasonable person have done
in the circumstances?
Actions that fall below socially acceptable
standards create liability for damages
Risk - The greater the risk of injury the
higher the standard
Note Reasonable expert
19
20. Special situations
- Children liable for their torts
– standard is that of a reasonable child of that age
- Occupiers must take reasonable steps to
protect visitors
- Innkeepers must look after property of guest
- Note modification of duty by statute
20
21. C - Causation
There must be injury or damage
Which was a direct result of the careless
conduct
Note thin skull rule
21
23. Defenses to contributory neg pg 26
Contributory negligence
– plaintiff partially responsible for own loss
– This used to be a complete defence
Negligence Act now allows court to apportion
responsibility
23
24. Defenses/2
Voluntarily assuming the risk
– a person who volunteers to enter a situation where
the risk of injury is obvious cannot recover
damages
– But must assume the legal risk as well
Note Crocker v Sundance case (p 2 case
handout)
24
25. Occupiers Liability pg 26, 27
Applies to owner or renter
Duty of care owed by occupier to
– Visitors
– Trespassers – adult, child
Applies to
– Conditions, sidewalks, holes, floors, stairs
– Activities, hot tubs
– Conduct of third parties
Reduce risk – waivers, signs, safe practices
25
26. Alcohol related pg 27, 28
Commercial hosts
Stewart v Pettie p 3 case handout
Employer parties
Jacobsen v Nike Canada p 4 case handout
26
27. Other business torts pg 28
Inducing breach
– Persuading person to breach contract
(inducement)
– Enticement – competitor
Fraud – Vancouver used car dealers CTV
show W5 and APA found 60% of cars offered
were odo rollbacks or wrecks welded together
Conversion – selling car don’t own
Trespass to chattels – damaging others
property
27
28. Other business torts ctd pg 29
Passing off
– Product offered in misleading way
– Mail scams
– Advertising with misleading photos
Trade slander or defamation
– Making false statements about plaintiff’s products
or services that hurt plaintiff
28
29. Discussion – Case Study
A 13 year-old defendant threw nitric acid at the 12
year-old plaintiff walking by his home. She suffered
severe burns to the back of her right leg and required
skin grafts. She has permanent cosmetic
disfigurements. The boy hid the nitric acid from his
parents. In an action for personal injuries, the plaintiff
sues the boy in tort and his parents in negligence
claiming they knowingly permitted their son to have a
dangerous substance.
Issues:
Is the boy liable for the injuries he caused?
Is his infancy a defence?
Are his parents liable in negligence for permitting him
to possess this substance?
29
30. Pollock et al. v. Lipkowitz et al. (1970), 17 D.L.R. (3d) 766 (Man. Q.B.)
Decision: Bastin J. concluded the boy was liable
but his parents were not. This was not an
appropriate case to award punitive damages
Reasons: Infancy is not a defence to a tort action.
The boy must be responsible for the injuries he
caused given that he was of normal
intelligence, knew the dangers of nitric acid and
had the antidote for nitric acid burns. It is not
relevant whether he intended to throw the acid on
the plaintiff or merely scare her since his actions
caused the injuries.
30
31. Reasons ctd
His parents are not liable because it would not occur
to even the most conscientious parent that a child
could obtain such a dangerous substance. There is a
great deal of difference between a harmless chemical
found in a child’s chemistry set and commercial
nitric acid.
Further, the boy concealed the nitric acid from his
parent. They were unaware of his possession of it.
As such, they were not negligent and did not
contribute to the injuries.
31
32. VIII Privacy Law pg 29, 30
Pragmatic solutions
HR Issues
Getting employee
buy-in
Lessons learned
32
33. Breach of Privacy pg 29
Privacy legislation prohibits using another
person’s name or photograph without
permission
Note application of Federal Personal
Information Protection and Electronic
Documents Act
33
34. Security and Privacy
Misuse of private information growing
concern
Care must be taken about giving personal
information over the internet
Unauthorized interception of private
communications difficult to control
Data stored on computers is vulnerable to
hackers
34
35. Employee Access
Ees have a right of access to their own
information
They have the ability to request correction of
errors
Should include access process in your policy
When an organization collects personal
information from an individual, it must give
notice of the purpose of collection and a
contact for questions
35
36. Informal Openness
Employers should allow employees to
access their own personal employee
records without needing formal request
for access under PIPA
A call to HR should permit the ee to
obtain the information they need
36
37. Purpose of Privacy Policy
Correct a situation
Prevent a situation
Outline rules or regulations
Ensure consistency within the
organization
Demonstrate due diligence
Support privacy complaint
resolution
Educate
37
38. HR Policies
Don’t have any – get some
– Develop a team
– Review
– Revise
– Keep current
– Three ring binder
Integrate privacy policies into overall co
policies
38
39. How to Involve Staff
Since staff are most affected by
policy, it is wise to involve
them
How much should staff be
involved depends on how you
want to spent the time
Time spent with staff in
advance is inversely
proportional to time spent
fixing things
39
40. Build privacy policy from
ground up
The worst situation is where
consultants “hit & run”
Privacy policies should be
developed by staff and managers
who use them
They can reflect values the
organization wants to exhibit
Ab reasonableness test
40
41. Privacy Gap Analysis
Files
Forms
Employe
e
Practices
HR
Payroll
Gap Standardized Forms
Analysis
Awareness
Information
Requests
Employee Driven
41
43. HR Audit Conduct an information audit:
who what, why, where and
how? Consider employee
involvement or their reps
Stop collecting personal
data that is irrelevant or
excessive
Ready - Ensure that workers
are aware of their individual
responsibility
Go – implement your
information policy and
review it on a regular basis
43
44. Privacy Policy Summary
Developing policies, procedures and
practices is a practical way of minimizing
employer risk of non-compliance
Policy should reflect values and direction of
the organization
Should assist the organization, not hinder it
Lastly they are a guide for staff, not a
substitute for good privacy management
44
45. Privacy Officer
Privacy Coach
Responsible to assist
individuals with concerns or
requests regarding
Access, collection, use or
disclosure of their own
personal
information, including
personal employee
information
45
46. Employee Information
The act specifically says that organizations
may collect personal employee info without
consent if the individual is an employee of the
organization, or the info is for recruiting
purposes
Orgs may not collect personal info unless the
collection is for reasonable purposes and is
related to the employment or volunteer work
relationship
46
47. Recruiting Info Sources
Your notes
Other peoples notes
Your forms
Your written comments
Who has access
Your policies
Your memos
47
48. Recruitment
Employers will be able to collect, use and
disclose certain employee information
without consent when it is reasonable to do
so.
What is reasonable?
Extension of existing Human Rights
legislation
Source OIPC
48
49. Recruitment
At hire - opportunity to have
employee consent to use of their
info while employed and after
If the employee is not hired, the
org must destroy the info, or
give it back to the individual,
unless that individual consents
otherwise
If keep resume on file, say for
how long, then destroy
Source Bill 44
49
50. Definition of Employee
Includes
apprentices, volunteers, participants, stu
dents, and individuals under contract to
an organization
Your policy should include all
May wish to include your Board of
Directors as well
50
51. Employee calls in sick
Er may ask for general
information necessary for
operation of the position
how long the employee
is expected to be away
from the workplace and
an date of return to work
Doctor’s note
No diagnostic info pls
51
52. Reference Checks
Only an individual's name and title is
public, most other information requested
for in a reference is considered personal
Many organizations have chosen not to
provide references of any kind, even
prior to privacy legislation concerns, due
to the potential risk of litigation.
52
53. Little risk of privacy implications with this
approach, however, it may not be in the best
interest of your organization
The goodwill of your organization in the minds
of former employees who left on good terms may
suffer, as they may have difficulty securing
employment without a reference
Morale – be reasonable, get consent
Rule of thumb – state facts not opinions, don’t
day anything you wouldn’t say to their face
Try to control ees providing references directly –
control info flow – tough to do, but worthwhile
53
54. You may wish to confirm employment
dates, titles and salaries only, with the
provision of a signed authorization by
the former employee.
May be done at time of request or
include at employee hire
Have departing employees complete a
standard Reference Authorization Form
detailing what specific information you
can release, to whom you can release it
and for what period of time.
54
55. You receive a call from a potential employer
requesting a reference
Prudent to request that they provide you with
authorization in writing from the former
employee via fax, unless you have an auth on
file
Compare signatures on file
55
56. EAP
Er should not get involved in EAP
Be very careful about release of any info
EAP counsellor usually owns the info
under contract, and the employer should
not have any access, except in very
specific situations like return to work, or
danger, or managed referrals
EAP counsellor should obtain consent
from ee
56
57. “Mortgage” Letters
Information like status (full
time or part-time), date of
hire, salary is personal
The employee would
specify exactly what
information is to be
released and to whom
Handle in hire letter
57
58. Duplicate Personnel Files
Managers often keep personal notes and
information about staff in duplicate corp files
Risky practice from more than just a privacy
perspective
Should an ee file a complaint under Human
Rights, Employment Standards or launch a civil
suit against an employer, documents contained
in both the manager's file and the official file are
subject to subpoena and disclosure
HR File Audit – Boy Scouts said it best “Be
Prepared”
58
59. Access to ee info
Differing departments need different
information about an employee
Not all need to see everything
Segregating certain types of employee
information as separate files or within
the file with different access protocols
would help
59
60. Benefits
How does your carrier
measure up?
You are responsible
What about employee
medical claim information?
Pensions, RSP’s, who has
access to information
60
61. Benefits
Census data for quotes
– No need to name names in lists of ees
Medical info
– Try and have carrier deal direct with ees
– Make experience info generic – no need to name
names
– ie. LTD claim, position title, medical
condition, mo benefit amt, start and expected end
date
61
62. When can opt-out consent be
used (aka negative option)
Notify the employee of the
purpose for which the
information is being
collected, used and disclosed
Allow the ee a reasonable
period of time to decline or
object to the proposed
collection, use or disclosure
62
63. Home Address
Home address is personal
information
Disclosure to third parties, must
be authorized by the employee in
writing
If your org has vendor
arrangements, the best approach
would be to have ees give
consent at hire
63
64. Ees are responsible too
No ee should disclose personal info on
staff, or use for their own personal purposes
Organization should have clear rules for itself
and its ees
Education is key
64
65. Monitoring Ees at work
• Monitoring,
listening, tracking
Ee activities is
controversial
• Ers can do it, but
tell people you are
doing it or may be
doing it
•Must have a reason
– can’t go fishing 65
66. Privacy Review
Put someone in charge
Understand the requirements
Review how you handle personal information
Test to see if you are compliant
Develop privacy policies and practices
Develop access and complaints processes
Review and revise forms
Review and revise contracts with third parties
Train staff
66
67. IX
Charter & Human Rights pg 44
When does it apply
Not to private matters
67
68. What rights are covered? Pg 45
Fundamental freedoms
Democratic
Mobility
Legal
Equality
Language
68
69. Charter Limitations pg 46
Reasonable limits
Notwithstanding clause
Keegstra p 6 case handout
69
70. Courts role pg 46, 47
Judges can rule other laws invalid if they
violate the Charter Section 52
24(1) Askimov case
24(2) evidence obtained in violation of
Charter
70
71. Ab Human Rights pg 47
Must fall in protected area and grounds
Who to complain to?
Ab Human Rights & Citizenship Commission
Within 12 mos
71
72. Process pg 48
Officer will try to resolve
Investigate
Panel
Enforcement thru courts
72
74. Are there some questions I can’t ask
in the interview?
74
75. Question Can’t ask Recommended
Gender, marital Plans for Availability for
status, family marriage, family work including
status childcare, gender, shift work, travel
marital status
Languages Ability in Ability in
languages not language required
required for job for job
Age Specific age Old enough to
work legally in
Alberta
75
76. Question Can’t ask Recommended
Name Maiden name, Previous names,
reference to name only if needed
origin to verify past
employment /
education
Race, colour, Place of birth, Legally
ancestry place citizenship, racial permitted to
of origin origin, next of kin work in Canada
76
77. Question Can’t ask Recommended
Photo- For as they can In rare situations
graphs reveal race, gender modelling,
entertainment
Clubs or Specific inquiries In cases where the
organiz- about memberships club or org are job
ations that would indicate related
race, religion….
Height & Min or max height Describe job
Weight weight norms duties that require
certain physical
requirements
77
78. Question Can’t ask Recommended
Disability General disabilities, Offer contingent
present or past health, upon satisfactory
WCB history job related
medical
Smoking Asthma, respiratory Working in Smoke
free env
Source of Anything unrelated to Job related info
income job about prev jobs
Education Religious or racial
affiliation of Education
Religious Holidays, customs Job related info
beliefs about prev jobs
78
79. BFOR pg 49
Bona fide occupational requirement
Meiorin Case p 8 case handout
79
84. S.W.O.T. Analysis (not in texts)
Factors Internal
Strengths Weakness
to Organization
Factors External Opportunities Threats
to Organization
84
85. SWOT: Description
A SWOT analysis generates
information that is helpful in matching
an organization’s goals, programs, and
capacities to the environment in which
it operates
It is an instrument within strategic
planning
When combined with dialogue it is a
participatory process
85
86. Simple Rules for SWOT Analysis
Be realistic about the strengths and weaknesses
of your organization or group
Distinguish between where your organization is
today, and where it could be in the future
Be specific: Avoid gray areas
Always analyze in relation to your core mission
Keep your SWOT short and simple
Avoid complexity and over analysis
86
87. Strengths
Consider from both the view of the org as
well as customers, competitors and
community members
Be realistic
One’s strength is another’s weakness
Questions:
– What is org’s advantages over others?
– What does the org do well?
– What makes you stand out from your
competitors?
87
88. Weaknesses
Consider from internal and external
viewpoint
Be truthful so that weaknesses may be
overcome as quickly as possible
One’s strength is another’s weakness
Questions.
– What is done poorly?
– What can be improved?
– What should be avoided?
88
89. Opportunities and Threats
Primarily external in nature
Represent characteristics of:
– the research environment
– growth in potential markets
– changes in the
competitive, economic, political/legal, technolo
gical, or socio-cultural environments
A threat to some is an opportunity to another
89
90. Questions on opportunities
– Is there a product/service area that others have
not yet covered?
– Are there emerging trends that fit with your
company's strengths?
Questions on threats
– Are your competitors becoming stronger?
– Are there emerging trends that amplify one of
your weaknesses?
90
91. For a company a strength could be:
marketing expertise
location of your business
innovative product
Image
Your quality of service
Your reputation
any other aspect that adds value to your
product or service
91
92. For a company a weakness could be:
lack of marketing expertise
undifferentiated products and service (i.e.
in relation to your competitors)
location of your business
damaged reputation
92
93. For a company an opportunity could be:
a developing market such as the Internet.
mergers, joint ventures or strategic
alliances
a new market
a market vacated by an ineffective
competitor
any external factor that may create demand
or the possibility for increased profitability
93
94. For a company a threat could be:
a new competitor in your market
price wars with competitors
a competitor that has a new, innovative
product or service
competitors have superior access to
channels of distribution
94
95. Expanding Your SWOT Analysis
Delve deeper into the details
Include more detailed competitor
information
Take a closer look at the business
environment.
Expand the reach of a SWOT analysis
through surveys.
Customer surveys
95
96. Word of Caution:
– SWOT analysis can be very subjective.
– Do not rely on it too much.
– Two people rarely come-up with the same
final version of SWOT.
96
97. Review, Reasons for JV Failure
P 9 JV booklet
1. Cultural differences
– Cross cultural training
– History of working together
– Successes early on
Poor or unclear leadership
– good communications
– clear decision making roles
– clear governance and accountability strategies
Poor integration process
– Capital contribution (money at risk)
– Clear dispute resolution process
97
98. Review Business Orgs 51, 52, 53
Taxation
Sole prop – not taxed on community
Partnership – same
Corp – separate entity, therefore taxed unless owned
by band then treated as a municipality. Ees working
for Corp on community are not taxed if Treaty
Name registration
– Protects names from other use
– Provides credibility and business number
– Avoids conflict where another business is operating under
same name
98
99. Exam
1. One mark for choice of ADR and 3 marks for
reason, total 10 marks. P 17
2. One mark for element and 1 mark for
description. Total 10 marks. P 31
3. A, B, C One mark for structure and one mark
for explanation/ description. One mark for
choice and one mark for each reason. Total
10 marks p 52, 53, 54
4. One mark for each reason and one mark for
each explanation. Total 10 marks. P 9.
99
100. Our offer to you
Please call if you have any HR, or workplace
issue that you are overwhelmed with
We can help you
We also are pleased to do Free Workshops for
your organization (some limits apply) Let us
know what your needs are and we will make it
happen!
100
101. CG Hylton - Services
HR Consulting Benefits, Pensions,
Job Descriptions EAP
Salary Grids Strategic Planning
Wellness at Work Drug and Alcohol
programs
Staff Morale
Dept re-orgs
Training and
Workshops Leadership
compensation
Tel 403 264 5288
chris@hylton.ca
101
102. Chris Hylton would like to
thank you for your attention
and time!
Questions?
Tel 264-5288
chris@hylton.ca
102