Week 2 – Assignment psy699Resources for the Integrative Literatu.docx
1. Week 2 – Assignment psy699
Resources for the Integrative Literature Review
Prior to beginning work on this written assignment, be sure to
carefully review the instructions for the Final Assignment,
which is due at the end of Week Six. In preparation for that
assignment, you will list the four required content domains you
have chosen for the Integrative Literature Review and provide a
minimum list of six resources you intend to use for each
domain. For assistance with researching your resources, please
view the Psychology Subject Guide (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site. in the Ashford University
Library.
For the group of resources in each domain, evaluate the
reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research findings
and provide a rationale for including the group within the
domain. These rationales should include descriptions of how the
research findings will function together in the Integrative
Literature Review.
Please use the format below for each of the four domains.
Name of the Domain: (e.g., Psychopharmacology)
List the complete references for each of the six resources.
Format your reference list in alphabetical order according to
APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to
an external site.)Links to an external site..
Rationale:
One to two paragraphs including the required information noted
above.
The Resources for the Integrative Literature Review
· Must include a separate title page with the following:
· Title of paper
· Student’s name
· Course name and number
· Instructor’s name
· Date submitted
20. people commit crimes. The concept of eugenics and the 1927
U.S. Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell present a particularly
unique situation.
Research the 1927 U.S. Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell.
The case involved state-enforced eugenic sterilization for
people who were considered feebleminded or otherwise
genetically inferior. Write a two-page research paper (not
counting the title and reference pages) on your findings.
Summarize the case, define the eugenic movement, and discuss
its role in this case. Address the following points within your
research paper:
· Define eugenics. What theory or theories of criminology does
eugenics relate to?
· What happened to eugenics, particularly to enforced
sterilization, in the years following the Supreme Court’s
findings in the Buck v. Bell case? What is the current legal
status of enforced sterilization in the United States? BCJ 2501,
Criminology 3
· Is the study of genetics (especially heredity) sufficiently
predictable to justify using it to make decisions such as those
imposed on Carrie Buck? Should genetics be used as the basis
for any type of legal decision? Make sure that you support your
answers.
You are required to use at least two outside sources for your
research paper. All sources used, including the textbook, must
be cited and referenced.
Week 6 - Final Assignment psy699:
Integrative Literature Review
Path builder is being used for this assignment. Please be certain
21. to complete the “Survey Acknowledgement Quiz” this week to
submit the Integrative Literature Review. You will not be
allowed to submit your Final Paper until you have completed
the quiz this week.
The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate
concepts from four different content domains within the larger
field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen
from previous coursework in this program. In this paper,
students will review the findings in the individual empirical
articles, organize the research in a meaningful way, evaluate the
reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research
findings, and present an integrated synthesis of the research that
sheds new light on the topics within and across the four
domains.
The result of a successful integrative literature review may be a
significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and,
consequently, to research and practice. Therefore, before
writing this literature review, substantive new research must be
conducted via the Internet and within the Ashford University
Library for each of the four chosen domains. A minimum of six
sources must be included for each of the four domains.
Although content from literature reviews completed in prior
courses within this program may be included, it may not
constitute the total research for the individual domains
addressed within this assignment. No more than four sources
from previous literature reviews completed in this program may
be utilized for this integrative review.
The headings listed below must be used within the paper to
delineate the sections of content. These sections include the
following: a clear introduction that provides a general review
and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in
which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and
synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn
together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are
brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed.
Introduction
22. · Provide a conceptual framework for the review.
· Describe how the review will be organized. The questions
below may be used to guide this section.
· What are the guiding theories within the domains?
· How are the domains connected?
· Are there competing points of view across the domains?
· Why is the integration of these domains important?
· What is the history of these domains?
· What are the related theories or findings?
· Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and
synthesized.
· How and why was the literature chosen?
· What is your claim or thesis statement?
Discussion
· Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review.
Analysis
· Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the
literature across the four domains.
· Integrate concepts from the four different content domains
within the larger field of psychology.
· What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?
· What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?
Critique
· Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the
chosen research findings.
· How well does the literature represent the issues across the
four domains?
· Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the
literature.
· What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?
· Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?
· What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the
literature?
· What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the
introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims
presented?
23. · Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists
and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or
generalizability of the chosen findings.
· Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?
· Were ethical considerations different across the domains?
Synthesis
· Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new
knowledge and new perspectives.
· Describe the research that has previously been done across
these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate
opinions that currently exist.
· Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being
made.
· Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based
psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships
and perspectives on the topics within the domains.
Conclusion
· Provide a conclusion and present potential future
considerations.
· State your final conclusion(s).
· Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a
succinct summary.
· What questions remain?
· What are the possible implications of your argument for
existing theories and for everyday life?
· Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for
future research?
· What do the overarching implications of the studies show?
· Where should the research go from this point to further the
understanding of these domains and the greater study of
psychology?
Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program
is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for
student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments
completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this
Integrative Literature Review, please implement any changes
24. recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site. and upload the revised
Integrative Literature Review to the portfolio. (Use the
Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide (Links to an external site.)Links to
an external site. to create an account if you do not already have
one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after
completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature
assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its
contents will be used in other courses and may be used by
individual students as a professional resource tool. See the
Pathbrite (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
website for information and further instructions on using this
portfolio tool.
The Integrative Literature Review
· Must be 20 to 30 double-spaced pages in length (not including
title and references pages) and formatted according to APA
style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site.
· Must include a separate title page with the following:
· Title of paper
· Student’s name
· Course name and number
· Instructor’s name
· Date submitted
· Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct
thesis statement.
· Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
· Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
· Must use at least 24 peer-reviewed sources, including a
minimum of 20 from the Ashford University Library.
· Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center.
· Must include a separate reference list that is formatted
according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center.
25. Week two assignment psy699
Required Resources
Articles
Auxier, A., Farley, T., & Seifert, K. (2011). Establishing an
integrated care practice in a community health center.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(5), 391–
397. doi:10.1037/a0024982
· The full-text version of this article can be accessed through
the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library.
This article describes a working integrated primary care model
that encompasses universal screening, consultation,
psychotherapy, and psychological testing.
Funderburk, J. S., Fielder, R. L., DE Martini, K. S., & Flynn, C.
A. (2012). Integrating behavioral health services into a
university health center: Patient and provider satisfaction.
Families, Systems, & Health, 30(2), 130–140.
doi:10.1037/a0028378
· The full-text version of this article can be accessed through
the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library.
This article describes a study in which an integrated behavioral
health care services program was implemented in a university
health center. One of the primary goals was to assess provider
and patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program.
Kelly, J. F., & Coons, H. L. (2012). Integrated health care and
professional psychology: Is the setting right for
you?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(6),
586–595. Retrieved from
https://library.ashford.edu/ezproxy.aspx?url=http%3A//search.e
bscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%2526AuthType=ip,cpid%
2526custid=s8856897%2526db=pdh%2526AN=2012-33696-
001%2526site=ehost-live
· The full-text version of this article can be accessed through
the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library.
This article provides an overview of integrated care to help
practicing psychologists develop a better understanding of the
26. advantages and challenges associated with integrated care.
London, L. H., Watson, E. C., & Berger, J. (2013). An
integrated primary care approach to help children B-
HIP!Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 1(2), 196–200.
doi:10.1037/cpp0000014
· The full-text version of this article can be accessed through
the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library.
This article outlines a collaborative health care initiative
designed to address the previously undiagnosed mental health
care needs of pediatric patients in a primary care setting.
Runyan, C. N. (2011). Psychology can be indispensable to
health care reform and the patient-centered medical home.
Psychological Services, 8(2), 53–68. doi:10.1037/a0023454
· The full-text version of this article can be accessed through
the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library.
This article argues for the role of psychology in integrated
health care and discusses training implications and
opportunities for psychologists.
Soklaridis, S., Kelner, M., Love, R., & Cassidy, D.J. (2009).
Integrative health care in a hospital setting: Communication
patterns between CAM and biomedical practitioners. Journal of
Interprofessional Care, 23(6), 655–667. Retrieved from
https://library.ashford.edu/ezproxy.aspx?url=http%3A//search.e
bscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%2526AuthType=ip,cpid%
2526custid=s8856897%2526db=a9h%2526AN=44746564%2526
site=ehost-live
· The full-text version of this article can be accessed through
the EBSCOhost database in the Ashford University Library.
This article explores communication and collaboration among
key stakeholders, including complementary and alternative
medicine (CAM) and biomedical practitioners, at an integrative
health clinic
Week two assignment psy699
