SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 50
Download to read offline
X-ray Interferometry 
Webster Cash 
University of Colorado
Co-Investigators 
• Steve Kahn - Columbia University 
• Mark Schattenburg - MIT 
• David Windt - Lucent (Bell-Labs)
Outline of Presentation 
• Science Potential 
• How to Do It 
• Laboratory Efforts 
• Mission Design 
• A Surprise Application 
• Summary
A Sufficiently Good Image is 
Like a Visit 
Resolution Log 
(arcsec) Improvement 
Cavemen 100 -- 
Galileo 3 1.5 
Palomar 1 2 
HST 0.1 3 
VLBA .001 5 
Voyager 10-5 7 
X-ray Int. 10-7 9
Capella 0.1”
Capella 0.01”
Capella 0.001”
Capella 0.0001”
Capella 0.00001”
Capella 0.000001”
AR Lac 
Simulation @ 100μas
AGN Accretion Disk 
Simulation @ 0.1μas 
(Chris Reynolds) 
Seeing the Strong Field Limit 
Is Believing
Need Resolution and Signal 
If we are going to do this, we need to support 
two basic capabilities: 
• Signal 
• Resolution
X-ray Source Brightness 
A more important [requirement] is astronomical and is critical: 
one needs at least one x-ray photon per resolution element to do 
interferometry. There are not that many x-ray photons around. 
This makes the proposal, though revolutionary, unrealizable. 
Anonymous Referee 
October, 1998 
WRONG!! 
Some X-ray sources are the brightest in the universe. 
We can actually see much smaller structures in the x-ray.
Optically Thick Sources 
Example: Mass Transfer Binary 
1037ergs/s from 109cm object 
That is ~10,000L from 10-4A = 108 B 
where B is the solar brightness in ergs/cm2/s/steradian 
Brightness is a conserved quantity and is the measure of visibility 
for a resolved object 
Note: Optically thin x-ray sources can have 
very low brightness and are inappropriate 
targets for interferometry. 
Same is true in all parts of spectrum!
Why X-ray Sources are Brighter 
The peak frequency of emission from a blackbody of temperature T is given 
by: 
The number of photons detected in an instrument is given by: 
1.8 x 10 − 
5 N G θ 
T 
Where N is in photons/cm2/s/ster. 
h 
ν 
Requiring N to be 100 photons and grasp G to be 1010cm2s, we find: 
min θ = 6x10− T − 
where θmin is the minimum detectable angular feature in radians. 
The baseline required to resolve θmin is: 
L = c = 5.8x10 T 
ν θ 
where L is the baseline in centimeters 
8 1/ 2 
max min 
11T 
max ν =10 
2 4 
max 
= 
10 1.5
Minimum Resolution
Status of X-ray Optics 
• Modest Resolution 
– 1 arcsec telescopes 
– 5 micron microscopes 
• Severe Scatter Problem 
– Mid-Frequency Ripple 
• Extreme Cost 
– Millions of Dollars Each 
– Years to Fabricate
Achieving High Resolution 
Use Interferometry to Bypass Diffraction Limit 
Michelson Stellar Interferometer 
R=λ/20000D 
R in Arcsec 
λ in Angstroms 
D in Meters
Classes of X-ray Interferometers 
Dispersive 
Non-Dispersive 
Elements are Crystals or Gratings 
Elements are Mirrors  Telescopes
Creating Fringes 
Requirements 
• Path Lengths Nearly Equal 
• Plate Scale Matched to Detector 
Pixels 
• Adequate Stability 
• Adequate Pointing 
• Diffraction Limited Optics 
D d
δ 
sin 
B1= 
θ 
B2 = B1cos(2θ ) 
[ ( )] δ θ 
Pathlength Tolerance Analysis at Grazing Incidence 
δ θ 2 sin 
OPD = B1− B2 = 1− cos 2 = 
θ 
sin 
θ 
δ λ 
20sin 
 
θ Β2 If OPD to be  λ/10 then 
( ) 
λ 
θ θ 
20sin cos 
d Baseline  
( ) 
θ 
λ 
20sin2 
d focal  
A1 A2 
S1 
S2 
δ 
A1  A2 in Phase Here 
C 
θ 
θ 
θ 
Β1
A Simple X-ray Interferometer 
Flats Beams Cross 
Detector
Beams Cross to Form Fringes 
d 
Two Plane Wavefronts Cross 
L
Wavefront Interference 
λ=θs (where s is fringe spacing) 
θ=d/L 
s = L λ s 
d
Beam Combiner 
•Just use two grazing incidence flats to steer two 
beams together. 
•Beats will occur, even if not focused 
•Fringe is spacing function of beam crossing angle 
•Grazing Incidence Mirrors Only 
•Flats OK 
•No 
•Partially Silvered Mirrors 
•Diffraction Gratings 
•Paraboloids 
•Windows or Filters 
•Diffraction Limited Optics OK
Slit 
Hg Source 
Fringes with Visible Light 
Double Slit 
4 Flats 
Filter 
CCD 
Picture of Interferometer One Channel Blocked Both Channel Open
Schematic 
of X-ray Interferometer 
Slit 
X-ray Source 
Double Slit 
4 Flats 
Filter 
CCD
Optics 
Each Mirror Was Adjustable 
From Outside Vacuum 
System was covered by thermal shroud
Stray Light Facility MSFC 
Source, filter and slit 
16m 
Interferometer CCD 
100m 
Used Long Distance To 
Maximize Fringe Spacing
CCD Image @ 1.25keV 
2 Beams Separate 2 Beams Superimposed
Fringes at 1.25keV 
Profile Across Illuminated Region
Argon 900-1000Å
Helium 304  584Å
Observatory Design 
Arbitrary Distance D 
Flats 
Wedge of Flats 
Detector
Observatory Design 
Multiple Spacings and Rotation 
Angles Needed Simultaneously to 
Sample UV Plan
Observatory Parameters 
(Example) 
4 Mirrors 300x100cm at 2degree graze makes 10x100cm beam 
Effective Area ~1000cm2 at 1.2keV (λ=1nm) 
Spacing (d) of combiner mirrors - 20cm 
Distance to Detector (L) - 1000km (Separate Spacecraft) 
Fringe Spacing (s) - 5mm (across 100mm at λ=1nm) 
Detector E/δE - 20 (100mm/5mm ) 
Resolution: D (m) Arcseconds 
60cm 3x10-4 
600m 3x10-7 
600km 3x10-10 
600,000km 3x10-13
Tolerance Table 
Resolution Arcseconds 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 
Baseline (m) 1 10 100 1000 
Mirror Size (cm) 3x100 3x100 3x100 3x100 
Position Stability (nm) 20 20 20 20 
Angular Stability (arcsec) 10-3 10-3 10-3 10-3 
Figure λ/100 λ/200 λ/200 λ/200 
Polish (Å rms) 20 20 20 20 
Angular Knowledge (as) 3x10-5 3x10-6 3x10-7 3x10-8 
Position Knowledge (nm) 2 2 2 2 
Field of View (Pixels) 20x20 20x20 1000x1000 1000x1000 
E/ΔE Detector 20 20 1000 1000 
Notes: 
•Angular stability is for individual mirrors relative to target direction. 
•Only the Angular Knowledge requirement grows tighter with baseline, but this is achieved by a (fixed) 
2nm relative position knowledge over a longer baseline. 
•Absolute positioning remains constant as interferometer grows, but does not get tighter!
Flats Held in Phase 
Sample Many Frequencies
As More Flats Are Used 
Pattern Approaches Image 
2 4 8 
12 16 32
Metrology 
Tightest Tolerance is Separation of Entrance Apertures 
d = λ/20θ=for tenth fringe stability 
At 1keV and 2deg, d=1.7nm 
At 6keV and 0.5deg, d=1.1nm 
Remains Constant No Matter the Baseline!
Pointing 
Need stability and information wrt to the celestial sphere 
at level of required resolution. 
L2 or Fly-away orbit probably necessary 
Pointing Angle Constraint is Positional Accuracy 
With Respect To Celestial Sphere
Pointing Solves Problem 
A 
B 
C 
D 
E 
F 
Visible light wavefront 
from distant star 
Consider, instead, line F. 
Mount the visible light interferometer on structures 
at the ends of line F. They then maintain 1nm precision 
wrt to guide star that lies perpendicular to F. This defines 
pointing AND maintains lateral position of convergers. 
(40pm not needed in D and E after all.) 
A, B, C, D and E all maintain position relative to F.
High Contrast Astronomy 
• Search for Planets 
• Problem: Close to Bright Stars 
• Diffraction and Scatter are Severe 
• Never Yet Been Done at Needed Level 
Grazing incidence may play a role!
Terrestrial 
Planet 
Finder 
Has A 
Problem!
Alternate Approach to TPF 
2 sin  
Scatter σ θ 
  ∝ 
λ 
• We have been assuming sinθ=1 and σ must 
be made small 
• Use grazing incidence: at sinθ=.01, the 
scatter is reduced a factor of 10,000 !!
Grazing Incidence Planetary Telescope 
• Tolerances similar to those needed for x-ray 
interferometry 
• Flats still attractive 
• Build arrays of flats to suppress diffraction
NIAC Program 
• Tolerances and Tradeoffs 
• Ball Aerospace Subcontract 
– Find Solution to Mission Problem 
– Discover Limitations 
• Simulation Code 
• Investigate Planetary Options
Summary 
• Science Will Be Outstanding - 
– Much Like Exploring 
• Resolution and Collecting are Achievable 
• Have Taken First Steps in the Lab 
• Mission Design Appear Feasible 
• May Have Application to Planet Imaging 
• Program Underway
Cash nov99

More Related Content

What's hot

Nov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagi
Nov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagiNov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagi
Nov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagiVikash Babu Rajput
 
SAR image interpretation
SAR image interpretationSAR image interpretation
SAR image interpretationElise Colin
 
Chapter 1 radiometry_and_photometry
Chapter 1 radiometry_and_photometryChapter 1 radiometry_and_photometry
Chapter 1 radiometry_and_photometryGabriel O'Brien
 
SIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light Fields
SIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light FieldsSIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light Fields
SIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light FieldsGordon Wetzstein
 
Double Slit Experiment
Double Slit ExperimentDouble Slit Experiment
Double Slit ExperimentG C
 
Diffraction
DiffractionDiffraction
DiffractionMidoOoz
 
Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment
Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment
Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment dwsutherland
 
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.pptzhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.pptgrssieee
 
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015Allison Westin, G.I.T.
 
Physics 102 formal report interference
Physics 102 formal report interferencePhysics 102 formal report interference
Physics 102 formal report interferencekgreine
 

What's hot (20)

Calculation of the temporal evolution of sound pressure levels in rooms - ICA...
Calculation of the temporal evolution of sound pressure levels in rooms - ICA...Calculation of the temporal evolution of sound pressure levels in rooms - ICA...
Calculation of the temporal evolution of sound pressure levels in rooms - ICA...
 
Nov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagi
Nov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagiNov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagi
Nov 2013 radiographic exposure and processing technique sp tyagi
 
SAR image interpretation
SAR image interpretationSAR image interpretation
SAR image interpretation
 
Ray tracing
Ray tracingRay tracing
Ray tracing
 
Chapter 1 radiometry_and_photometry
Chapter 1 radiometry_and_photometryChapter 1 radiometry_and_photometry
Chapter 1 radiometry_and_photometry
 
SIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light Fields
SIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light FieldsSIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light Fields
SIGGRAPH 2012 Computational Plenoptic Imaging Course - 4 Light Fields
 
Double slit
Double slitDouble slit
Double slit
 
Laser source
Laser sourceLaser source
Laser source
 
Double Slit Experiment
Double Slit ExperimentDouble Slit Experiment
Double Slit Experiment
 
What are stars made of?
What are stars made of?What are stars made of?
What are stars made of?
 
DIFFRACTION OF LIGHT
DIFFRACTION OF LIGHTDIFFRACTION OF LIGHT
DIFFRACTION OF LIGHT
 
Diffraction
DiffractionDiffraction
Diffraction
 
Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment
Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment
Diffraction & Double Slit Experiment
 
Cc ds
Cc dsCc ds
Cc ds
 
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.pptzhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
 
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
AGU - DEC 2015 - Point Grey Poster-Nov112015
 
Telescope
TelescopeTelescope
Telescope
 
Physics 102 formal report interference
Physics 102 formal report interferencePhysics 102 formal report interference
Physics 102 formal report interference
 
Influence of artificial soiling on the power losses of different PV technologies
Influence of artificial soiling on the power losses of different PV technologiesInfluence of artificial soiling on the power losses of different PV technologies
Influence of artificial soiling on the power losses of different PV technologies
 
Prism
PrismPrism
Prism
 

Viewers also liked

Financial Communications
Financial CommunicationsFinancial Communications
Financial CommunicationsClaudio Missier
 
Stiforp - how to make money online - Czech
Stiforp - how to make money online - CzechStiforp - how to make money online - Czech
Stiforp - how to make money online - CzechFilipe Porto
 
Adamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpoint
Adamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpointAdamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpoint
Adamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpointSTIFORP
 
Podporující komunikace2
Podporující komunikace2Podporující komunikace2
Podporující komunikace2romanbiath
 
Essens prezentace-cz
Essens prezentace-czEssens prezentace-cz
Essens prezentace-czShahid Rao
 
21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set
21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set
21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways setMarc Heleven
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Financial Communications
Financial CommunicationsFinancial Communications
Financial Communications
 
Stiforp - how to make money online - Czech
Stiforp - how to make money online - CzechStiforp - how to make money online - Czech
Stiforp - how to make money online - Czech
 
Adamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpoint
Adamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpointAdamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpoint
Adamasa.marketing plan.new2.powerpoint
 
Podporující komunikace2
Podporující komunikace2Podporující komunikace2
Podporující komunikace2
 
Analyza 2015 3cast
Analyza 2015 3castAnalyza 2015 3cast
Analyza 2015 3cast
 
Essens prezentace-cz
Essens prezentace-czEssens prezentace-cz
Essens prezentace-cz
 
Fresh Ideas In To Your Business ...
Fresh Ideas In To Your Business ...Fresh Ideas In To Your Business ...
Fresh Ideas In To Your Business ...
 
21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set
21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set
21 ways for innovation. Get your own 21 ways set
 

Similar to Cash nov99

Ultimate astronomicalimaging
Ultimate astronomicalimagingUltimate astronomicalimaging
Ultimate astronomicalimagingClifford Stone
 
Transmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptx
Transmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptxTransmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptx
Transmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptxBagraBay
 
Microprobing with electrons
Microprobing with electronsMicroprobing with electrons
Microprobing with electronsJonathan Price
 
Analysis of SAED patterns
Analysis of SAED patternsAnalysis of SAED patterns
Analysis of SAED patternsAntilen Jacob
 
XRF Basic Principles
XRF Basic PrinciplesXRF Basic Principles
XRF Basic PrinciplesMarion Becker
 
4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt
4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt
4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.pptRajniGarg39
 
8.1. microtech ion implant,1,2
8.1. microtech ion implant,1,28.1. microtech ion implant,1,2
8.1. microtech ion implant,1,2Bhargav Veepuri
 
Spectrophotometry methods for molecule analysis
Spectrophotometry methods for molecule analysisSpectrophotometry methods for molecule analysis
Spectrophotometry methods for molecule analysisygpark2221
 
Crystal structure analysis
Crystal structure analysisCrystal structure analysis
Crystal structure analysiszoelfalia
 
03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf
03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf
03-GenXrays-PPT.pdfHassanSoboh
 
X ray generation Radiology information by rahul ppt 2
X ray generation  Radiology information by rahul ppt 2X ray generation  Radiology information by rahul ppt 2
X ray generation Radiology information by rahul ppt 2Rahul Midha
 
Diffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detail
Diffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detailDiffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detail
Diffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detailDivyaPatel294431
 
Small-angle X-ray Diffraction
Small-angle X-ray Diffraction Small-angle X-ray Diffraction
Small-angle X-ray Diffraction ssuser3eb6b21
 
Slide share version historical background of diffractometer
Slide share version historical background of diffractometerSlide share version historical background of diffractometer
Slide share version historical background of diffractometerUniversity of Karachi
 
X ray diffraction or braggs diffraction or
X ray diffraction or braggs diffraction orX ray diffraction or braggs diffraction or
X ray diffraction or braggs diffraction orbpati5271
 

Similar to Cash nov99 (20)

Xray interferometry
Xray interferometryXray interferometry
Xray interferometry
 
Ultimate astronomicalimaging
Ultimate astronomicalimagingUltimate astronomicalimaging
Ultimate astronomicalimaging
 
Transmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptx
Transmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptxTransmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptx
Transmission Electron Microscope_Lecture1.pptx
 
1200 cash[2]
1200 cash[2]1200 cash[2]
1200 cash[2]
 
Microprobing with electrons
Microprobing with electronsMicroprobing with electrons
Microprobing with electrons
 
Analysis of SAED patterns
Analysis of SAED patternsAnalysis of SAED patterns
Analysis of SAED patterns
 
XRF Basic Principles
XRF Basic PrinciplesXRF Basic Principles
XRF Basic Principles
 
Astronomical observations.ppt
Astronomical observations.pptAstronomical observations.ppt
Astronomical observations.ppt
 
4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt
4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt
4_2020_03_20!07_33_21_PM.ppt
 
8.1. microtech ion implant,1,2
8.1. microtech ion implant,1,28.1. microtech ion implant,1,2
8.1. microtech ion implant,1,2
 
Spectrophotometry methods for molecule analysis
Spectrophotometry methods for molecule analysisSpectrophotometry methods for molecule analysis
Spectrophotometry methods for molecule analysis
 
Crystal structure analysis
Crystal structure analysisCrystal structure analysis
Crystal structure analysis
 
03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf
03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf
03-GenXrays-PPT.pdf
 
X ray generation Radiology information by rahul ppt 2
X ray generation  Radiology information by rahul ppt 2X ray generation  Radiology information by rahul ppt 2
X ray generation Radiology information by rahul ppt 2
 
Diffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detail
Diffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detailDiffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detail
Diffraction-grating experiment ppt with full detail
 
Laser lecture 04
Laser lecture 04Laser lecture 04
Laser lecture 04
 
Chap6 photodetectors
Chap6 photodetectorsChap6 photodetectors
Chap6 photodetectors
 
Small-angle X-ray Diffraction
Small-angle X-ray Diffraction Small-angle X-ray Diffraction
Small-angle X-ray Diffraction
 
Slide share version historical background of diffractometer
Slide share version historical background of diffractometerSlide share version historical background of diffractometer
Slide share version historical background of diffractometer
 
X ray diffraction or braggs diffraction or
X ray diffraction or braggs diffraction orX ray diffraction or braggs diffraction or
X ray diffraction or braggs diffraction or
 

More from Clifford Stone (20)

Zubrin nov99
Zubrin nov99Zubrin nov99
Zubrin nov99
 
Xray telescopeconcept
Xray telescopeconceptXray telescopeconcept
Xray telescopeconcept
 
Wpafb blue bookdocuments
Wpafb blue bookdocumentsWpafb blue bookdocuments
Wpafb blue bookdocuments
 
What gov knows_about_ufos
What gov knows_about_ufosWhat gov knows_about_ufos
What gov knows_about_ufos
 
Welcome oct02
Welcome oct02Welcome oct02
Welcome oct02
 
Weather jun02
Weather jun02Weather jun02
Weather jun02
 
Wassersug richard[1]
Wassersug richard[1]Wassersug richard[1]
Wassersug richard[1]
 
Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952
Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952
Washington, d.c., jul 26 27, 1952
 
Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952
Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952
Wash dc jul 19 to 20 1952
 
Vol4ch03
Vol4ch03Vol4ch03
Vol4ch03
 
Vol4ch02
Vol4ch02Vol4ch02
Vol4ch02
 
Vol4ch01
Vol4ch01Vol4ch01
Vol4ch01
 
Vol3ch16
Vol3ch16Vol3ch16
Vol3ch16
 
Vol3ch14
Vol3ch14Vol3ch14
Vol3ch14
 
Vol3ch13
Vol3ch13Vol3ch13
Vol3ch13
 
Vol3ch12
Vol3ch12Vol3ch12
Vol3ch12
 
Vol3ch11
Vol3ch11Vol3ch11
Vol3ch11
 
Vol3ch10
Vol3ch10Vol3ch10
Vol3ch10
 
Vol3ch09
Vol3ch09Vol3ch09
Vol3ch09
 
Vol3ch08
Vol3ch08Vol3ch08
Vol3ch08
 

Cash nov99

  • 1. X-ray Interferometry Webster Cash University of Colorado
  • 2. Co-Investigators • Steve Kahn - Columbia University • Mark Schattenburg - MIT • David Windt - Lucent (Bell-Labs)
  • 3. Outline of Presentation • Science Potential • How to Do It • Laboratory Efforts • Mission Design • A Surprise Application • Summary
  • 4. A Sufficiently Good Image is Like a Visit Resolution Log (arcsec) Improvement Cavemen 100 -- Galileo 3 1.5 Palomar 1 2 HST 0.1 3 VLBA .001 5 Voyager 10-5 7 X-ray Int. 10-7 9
  • 11. AR Lac Simulation @ 100μas
  • 12. AGN Accretion Disk Simulation @ 0.1μas (Chris Reynolds) Seeing the Strong Field Limit Is Believing
  • 13. Need Resolution and Signal If we are going to do this, we need to support two basic capabilities: • Signal • Resolution
  • 14. X-ray Source Brightness A more important [requirement] is astronomical and is critical: one needs at least one x-ray photon per resolution element to do interferometry. There are not that many x-ray photons around. This makes the proposal, though revolutionary, unrealizable. Anonymous Referee October, 1998 WRONG!! Some X-ray sources are the brightest in the universe. We can actually see much smaller structures in the x-ray.
  • 15. Optically Thick Sources Example: Mass Transfer Binary 1037ergs/s from 109cm object That is ~10,000L from 10-4A = 108 B where B is the solar brightness in ergs/cm2/s/steradian Brightness is a conserved quantity and is the measure of visibility for a resolved object Note: Optically thin x-ray sources can have very low brightness and are inappropriate targets for interferometry. Same is true in all parts of spectrum!
  • 16. Why X-ray Sources are Brighter The peak frequency of emission from a blackbody of temperature T is given by: The number of photons detected in an instrument is given by: 1.8 x 10 − 5 N G θ T Where N is in photons/cm2/s/ster. h ν Requiring N to be 100 photons and grasp G to be 1010cm2s, we find: min θ = 6x10− T − where θmin is the minimum detectable angular feature in radians. The baseline required to resolve θmin is: L = c = 5.8x10 T ν θ where L is the baseline in centimeters 8 1/ 2 max min 11T max ν =10 2 4 max = 10 1.5
  • 18. Status of X-ray Optics • Modest Resolution – 1 arcsec telescopes – 5 micron microscopes • Severe Scatter Problem – Mid-Frequency Ripple • Extreme Cost – Millions of Dollars Each – Years to Fabricate
  • 19. Achieving High Resolution Use Interferometry to Bypass Diffraction Limit Michelson Stellar Interferometer R=λ/20000D R in Arcsec λ in Angstroms D in Meters
  • 20. Classes of X-ray Interferometers Dispersive Non-Dispersive Elements are Crystals or Gratings Elements are Mirrors Telescopes
  • 21. Creating Fringes Requirements • Path Lengths Nearly Equal • Plate Scale Matched to Detector Pixels • Adequate Stability • Adequate Pointing • Diffraction Limited Optics D d
  • 22. δ sin B1= θ B2 = B1cos(2θ ) [ ( )] δ θ Pathlength Tolerance Analysis at Grazing Incidence δ θ 2 sin OPD = B1− B2 = 1− cos 2 = θ sin θ δ λ 20sin θ Β2 If OPD to be λ/10 then ( ) λ θ θ 20sin cos d Baseline ( ) θ λ 20sin2 d focal A1 A2 S1 S2 δ A1 A2 in Phase Here C θ θ θ Β1
  • 23. A Simple X-ray Interferometer Flats Beams Cross Detector
  • 24. Beams Cross to Form Fringes d Two Plane Wavefronts Cross L
  • 25. Wavefront Interference λ=θs (where s is fringe spacing) θ=d/L s = L λ s d
  • 26. Beam Combiner •Just use two grazing incidence flats to steer two beams together. •Beats will occur, even if not focused •Fringe is spacing function of beam crossing angle •Grazing Incidence Mirrors Only •Flats OK •No •Partially Silvered Mirrors •Diffraction Gratings •Paraboloids •Windows or Filters •Diffraction Limited Optics OK
  • 27. Slit Hg Source Fringes with Visible Light Double Slit 4 Flats Filter CCD Picture of Interferometer One Channel Blocked Both Channel Open
  • 28. Schematic of X-ray Interferometer Slit X-ray Source Double Slit 4 Flats Filter CCD
  • 29. Optics Each Mirror Was Adjustable From Outside Vacuum System was covered by thermal shroud
  • 30. Stray Light Facility MSFC Source, filter and slit 16m Interferometer CCD 100m Used Long Distance To Maximize Fringe Spacing
  • 31. CCD Image @ 1.25keV 2 Beams Separate 2 Beams Superimposed
  • 32. Fringes at 1.25keV Profile Across Illuminated Region
  • 34. Helium 304 584Å
  • 35. Observatory Design Arbitrary Distance D Flats Wedge of Flats Detector
  • 36. Observatory Design Multiple Spacings and Rotation Angles Needed Simultaneously to Sample UV Plan
  • 37. Observatory Parameters (Example) 4 Mirrors 300x100cm at 2degree graze makes 10x100cm beam Effective Area ~1000cm2 at 1.2keV (λ=1nm) Spacing (d) of combiner mirrors - 20cm Distance to Detector (L) - 1000km (Separate Spacecraft) Fringe Spacing (s) - 5mm (across 100mm at λ=1nm) Detector E/δE - 20 (100mm/5mm ) Resolution: D (m) Arcseconds 60cm 3x10-4 600m 3x10-7 600km 3x10-10 600,000km 3x10-13
  • 38. Tolerance Table Resolution Arcseconds 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 Baseline (m) 1 10 100 1000 Mirror Size (cm) 3x100 3x100 3x100 3x100 Position Stability (nm) 20 20 20 20 Angular Stability (arcsec) 10-3 10-3 10-3 10-3 Figure λ/100 λ/200 λ/200 λ/200 Polish (Å rms) 20 20 20 20 Angular Knowledge (as) 3x10-5 3x10-6 3x10-7 3x10-8 Position Knowledge (nm) 2 2 2 2 Field of View (Pixels) 20x20 20x20 1000x1000 1000x1000 E/ΔE Detector 20 20 1000 1000 Notes: •Angular stability is for individual mirrors relative to target direction. •Only the Angular Knowledge requirement grows tighter with baseline, but this is achieved by a (fixed) 2nm relative position knowledge over a longer baseline. •Absolute positioning remains constant as interferometer grows, but does not get tighter!
  • 39. Flats Held in Phase Sample Many Frequencies
  • 40. As More Flats Are Used Pattern Approaches Image 2 4 8 12 16 32
  • 41. Metrology Tightest Tolerance is Separation of Entrance Apertures d = λ/20θ=for tenth fringe stability At 1keV and 2deg, d=1.7nm At 6keV and 0.5deg, d=1.1nm Remains Constant No Matter the Baseline!
  • 42. Pointing Need stability and information wrt to the celestial sphere at level of required resolution. L2 or Fly-away orbit probably necessary Pointing Angle Constraint is Positional Accuracy With Respect To Celestial Sphere
  • 43. Pointing Solves Problem A B C D E F Visible light wavefront from distant star Consider, instead, line F. Mount the visible light interferometer on structures at the ends of line F. They then maintain 1nm precision wrt to guide star that lies perpendicular to F. This defines pointing AND maintains lateral position of convergers. (40pm not needed in D and E after all.) A, B, C, D and E all maintain position relative to F.
  • 44. High Contrast Astronomy • Search for Planets • Problem: Close to Bright Stars • Diffraction and Scatter are Severe • Never Yet Been Done at Needed Level Grazing incidence may play a role!
  • 45. Terrestrial Planet Finder Has A Problem!
  • 46. Alternate Approach to TPF 2 sin Scatter σ θ ∝ λ • We have been assuming sinθ=1 and σ must be made small • Use grazing incidence: at sinθ=.01, the scatter is reduced a factor of 10,000 !!
  • 47. Grazing Incidence Planetary Telescope • Tolerances similar to those needed for x-ray interferometry • Flats still attractive • Build arrays of flats to suppress diffraction
  • 48. NIAC Program • Tolerances and Tradeoffs • Ball Aerospace Subcontract – Find Solution to Mission Problem – Discover Limitations • Simulation Code • Investigate Planetary Options
  • 49. Summary • Science Will Be Outstanding - – Much Like Exploring • Resolution and Collecting are Achievable • Have Taken First Steps in the Lab • Mission Design Appear Feasible • May Have Application to Planet Imaging • Program Underway