Rtpcr
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•5 views
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 60-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named Mariyakunhi showed a negative result for COVID-19 from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 26-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 20/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 20-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 21/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient. The test result for the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting negative and positive test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 26-year-old male patient named Mohammed Thamees. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 28/09/2021 and reported on 29/09/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction testing. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 26-year-old female patient named Ayishath Shafeeda K A showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Recommended
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named Mariyakunhi showed a negative result for COVID-19 from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 26-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 20/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 20-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 21/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient. The test result for the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting negative and positive test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 26-year-old male patient named Mohammed Thamees. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 28/09/2021 and reported on 29/09/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction testing. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 26-year-old female patient named Ayishath Shafeeda K A showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 53-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and interpretations for positive and negative test results which should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 28-year-old female patient named Ummul Sakira K A showed a SARS-CoV-2 test result that was negative. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 41-year-old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 15-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the test method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A 16-year-old female presented with a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab that was tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 32-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of COVID-19 testing done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report dated 21/09/2021 provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from 45-year-old female patient Faathimathul Fouziyya Abdulla. The SARS-CoV-2 test was conducted using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample from Sharique Muhammed Pandial, a 32-year-old male. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report also provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. Real-time PCR was used to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides background information on corona viruses and the test methodology. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 23-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 20-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 56-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the test performed, specimen details, interpretation of results, and is signed off by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Thamam Shuhshad summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test results for a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen were negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 53-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and interpretations for positive and negative test results which should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 28-year-old female patient named Ummul Sakira K A showed a SARS-CoV-2 test result that was negative. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 41-year-old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 15-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the test method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A 16-year-old female presented with a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab that was tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 32-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of COVID-19 testing done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report dated 21/09/2021 provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from 45-year-old female patient Faathimathul Fouziyya Abdulla. The SARS-CoV-2 test was conducted using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample from Sharique Muhammed Pandial, a 32-year-old male. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report also provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. Real-time PCR was used to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides background information on corona viruses and the test methodology. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 23-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 20-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
What's hot (20)
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
Similar to Rtpcr
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 56-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the test performed, specimen details, interpretation of results, and is signed off by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Thamam Shuhshad summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test results for a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen were negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 60-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) returned a negative result. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from 21-year-old female patient Mariyam Shabna and tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper sample collection, transport, or handling. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Nidhi Subhash shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 48-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the novel coronavirus was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a sample collected from Mahin Izaan C H on 21/10/2021.
- The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) testing.
- A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the negative test result.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Abdul Janif B M and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 23-year-old female patient using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on August 9th and the results were reported on September 9th. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Abdul Kader Arafath. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's condition.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 21-year-old male patient named Mohammed Valeed. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on March 10, 2021. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The document is a laboratory report for a COVID-19 test. It summarizes that the test for the patient Mohammed Shazin V F was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Haidar Ali P A and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Saifudeen K H, a 26 year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and notes that negative results require correlation with clinical findings.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 23-year-old male patient. The test was a Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) test, and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting test results.
Similar to Rtpcr (20)
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Recently uploaded
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS)
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS). Parc Taulí. Sabadell
Acute Gout Care & Urate Lowering Therapy .pdf
In this document , the management of acute gout attacks and a description of urate lowering therapy is mentioned.
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Fallopian tube blockage may cause female infertility. For treatment, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can be a solution.
SENSORY NEEDS B.SC. NURSING SEMESTER II.
Sensation is the neurological process by which we become aware of surrounding environment.
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
Dr. ZANAB FARHEEN FAYAZ ,MDS(ORTHODONTICS & DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS ).
What are the different types of Dental implants.
Are you looking for a long-lasting solution to your missing tooth?
Dental implants are the most common type of method for replacing the missing tooth. Unlike dentures or bridges, implants are surgically placed in the jawbone. In layman’s terms, a dental implant is similar to the natural root of the tooth. It offers a stable foundation for the artificial tooth giving it the look, feel, and function similar to the natural tooth.
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
Vonoprazan, a new potassium acid channel blocker used in the conditions of GERD and gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer ....
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptx
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
une 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdfChulalongkorn Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group
Pollen and Fungal allergy
Presented by Chaloemchai Chumsaengchotsakul, MD.
June 14, 2024Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
NARCOTICS- POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR ITS USE
This document outlines policies and procedures for handling narcotic and controlled drugs in NABH accredited hospitals.
DECLARATION OF HELSINKI - History and principles
This SlideShare presentation provides a comprehensive overview of the Declaration of Helsinki, a foundational document outlining ethical guidelines for conducting medical research involving human subjects.
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Do you have abnormal smell after periods? It may be vaginitis. Do not worry, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can help you get a cure.
Know the difference between Endodontics and Orthodontics.
Your smile is beautiful.
Let’s be honest. Maintaining that beautiful smile is not an easy task. It is more than brushing and flossing. Sometimes, you might encounter dental issues that need special dental care. These issues can range anywhere from misalignment of the jaw to pain in the root of teeth.
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.Recently uploaded (20)
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Know the difference between Endodontics and Orthodontics.
Know the difference between Endodontics and Orthodontics.
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
Rtpcr
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135657 : 24/09/2021 4:16 PM : 24/09/2021 4:21 PM : 25/09/2021 7:28 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : Mohammed Shafi Bannar Koya : V134262 : 60 Y/ M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara : 8549 0043 6452 : 20/09/1961 MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist