Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•5 views
The document is a laboratory report for a COVID-19 test. It summarizes that the test for the patient Mohammed Shazin V F was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 20-year-old female patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on August 10, 2021 and the report was issued on September 10, 2021. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used. It emphasizes that test results should be considered in the clinical context of the patient.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
01115831 2021-09-20
A COVID-19 test was performed on samples collected from B Chidambara Naik, a 66-year-old male. The test was performed using an ICMR-approved RT-PCR kit and the results were negative for the SARS CoV-2 virus. The report notes that negative results do not rule out COVID-19 and should not be the sole basis for patient management. It also notes that viral nucleic acid may still be present even if the test is negative and detection does not necessarily indicate an active infection or that the virus is the cause of any symptoms. The results only pertain to the specific samples received and tested.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 48-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and symptoms. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology at an ICMR-approved laboratory to qualitatively detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 30-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Gokul Das and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Recommended
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 20-year-old female patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on August 10, 2021 and the report was issued on September 10, 2021. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used. It emphasizes that test results should be considered in the clinical context of the patient.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
01115831 2021-09-20
A COVID-19 test was performed on samples collected from B Chidambara Naik, a 66-year-old male. The test was performed using an ICMR-approved RT-PCR kit and the results were negative for the SARS CoV-2 virus. The report notes that negative results do not rule out COVID-19 and should not be the sole basis for patient management. It also notes that viral nucleic acid may still be present even if the test is negative and detection does not necessarily indicate an active infection or that the virus is the cause of any symptoms. The results only pertain to the specific samples received and tested.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 48-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and symptoms. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology at an ICMR-approved laboratory to qualitatively detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 30-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Gokul Das and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mufeedh Ali Baramy, a 33-year-old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Ashthaf Ali C, a 34-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and interpretation of positive and negative test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Abdul Janif B M and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 46-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 23/10/2021 and reported on the same day. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 41-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq summarizes that: a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction testing; the test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19; and a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 67-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the implications of positive and negative test results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in upper and lower respiratory specimens. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results in the context of a patient's clinical presentation and exposure history.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient to detect SARS-CoV-2. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not present in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the RT-PCR test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the testing method used, details on coronavirus and the test interpretation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Ayshath Nafla summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, the meaning of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient. The test result for the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting negative and positive test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Shazin shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of his nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not rule out infection, as the test can return false negatives. The interpretation guidance notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and recommends repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimens for severe or progressive disease.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mufeedh Ali Baramy, a 33-year-old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Ashthaf Ali C, a 34-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and interpretation of positive and negative test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Abdul Janif B M and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 46-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 23/10/2021 and reported on the same day. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 41-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq summarizes that: a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction testing; the test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19; and a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 67-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the implications of positive and negative test results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in upper and lower respiratory specimens. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results in the context of a patient's clinical presentation and exposure history.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient to detect SARS-CoV-2. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not present in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the RT-PCR test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the testing method used, details on coronavirus and the test interpretation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Ayshath Nafla summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, the meaning of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient. The test result for the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting negative and positive test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Shazin shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of his nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not rule out infection, as the test can return false negatives. The interpretation guidance notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and recommends repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimens for severe or progressive disease.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A molecular biology report for a patient named Fathima Afreen summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen. However, the report notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 21-year-old male patient named Mohammed Valeed. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on March 10, 2021. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140
A molecular biology report for a patient named Farzaan Sayyah showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases like MERS and SARS. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not rule out infection, and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 21-year-old male patient named Mohammed Valeed. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 15/10/2021 and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 21-year old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 23-year-old male patient. The test was a Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) test, and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210930041407
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Fathima Afreen, a 21-year old female patient, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper sample collection, transport, or handling. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Abdul Kader Arafath. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Nidhi Subhash, a 24 year old female, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report also provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes with the signatures of the reviewing microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mohammed Thamees and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Nidhi Subhash shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. Real-time PCR was used to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 23-year-old female patient using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on August 9th and the results were reported on September 9th. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Similar to Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745 (20)
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Nidhi subash rtpcr
This document is a lab report for a COVID-19 RT-PCR test. It indicates that the test for the sample from Miss. Nidhi Subash, a 24-year-old female, came back negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The test was performed at Sankar's Healthcare Scans and Diagnostics in Alappuzha, Kerala, India and analyzed samples from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab using real-time RT-PCR. The report provides background on SARS-CoV-2 and the test methodology, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical observations.
More from Care Reference Laboratory (20)
Recently uploaded
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
The benefits of an ePCR solution should extend to the whole EMS organization, not just certain groups of people or certain departments. It should provide more than just a form for entering and a database for storing information. It should also include a workflow of how information is communicated, used and stored across the entire organization.
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a simplified look into the mechanisms involved in the regulation of respiration:
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the organisation of respiratory center
2. Describe the nervous control of inspiration and respiratory rhythm
3. Describe the functions of the dorsal and respiratory groups of neurons
4. Describe the influences of the Pneumotaxic and Apneustic centers
5. Explain the role of Hering-Breur inflation reflex in regulation of inspiration
6. Explain the role of central chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
7. Explain the role of peripheral chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
8. Explain the regulation of respiration during exercise
9. Integrate the respiratory regulatory mechanisms
10. Describe the Cheyne-Stokes breathing
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 42, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 36, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 13, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
Ketone bodies and metabolism-biochemistry
This slide consists of all the topics of ketone . This can be used for exam purpose for writing about Diabetic keto acidosis etc . Thank you
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
• Pitfalls and pivots needed to use AI effectively in public health
• Evidence-based strategies to address health misinformation effectively
• Building trust with communities online and offline
• Equipping health professionals to address questions, concerns and health misinformation
• Assessing risk and mitigating harm from adverse health narratives in communities, health workforce and health system
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
une 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Acute Gout Care & Urate Lowering Therapy .pdf
In this document , the management of acute gout attacks and a description of urate lowering therapy is mentioned.
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
The skin is the largest organ and its health plays a vital role among the other sense organs. The skin concerns like acne breakout, psoriasis, or anything similar along the lines, finding a qualified and experienced dermatologist becomes paramount.
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
This quiz was conducted as a promotional event for the 2024 Annual Meet of Kerala Chapter of API.
More than 20 participants took part everyday !
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS)
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS). Parc Taulí. Sabadell
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Travel Clinic Cardiff offers comprehensive travel health services, including vaccinations, travel advice, and preventive care for international travelers. Our expert team ensures you are well-prepared and protected for your journey, providing personalized consultations tailored to your destination. Conveniently located in Cardiff, we help you travel with confidence and peace of mind. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Do you have abnormal smell after periods? It may be vaginitis. Do not worry, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can help you get a cure.
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
Vonoprazan, a new potassium acid channel blocker used in the conditions of GERD and gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer ....
CLEAR ALIGNER THERAPY IN ORTHODONTICS .pptx
Dr. ZANAB FARHEEN FAYAZ ,MDS(ORTHODONTICS & DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS ).
Recently uploaded (20)
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Tests for analysis of different pharmaceutical.pptx
Tests for analysis of different pharmaceutical.pptx
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135662 : 08/10/2021 4:16 PM : 08/10/2021 4:21 PM : 09/10/2021 7:28 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : Mohammed Shazin V F : V134268 : 21 Y/ M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara : XXXX XXXX XXXX : DD/MM/YYYY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist