edu 645 week 1 assignment response to intervention,edu 645 week 1 dq 1 assessment crisis,edu 645 week 1 dq 2 no child left behind nclb and high stakes testing hst debate,ash edu 645 week 1,ash edu 645 week 1,ash edu 645,ash edu 645 week 1 tutorial,ash edu 645 week 1 assignment,ash edu 645 week 1 help

1. ASH EDU 645 Week 1 Discussion 2 Standards and
Objectives NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/edu-645-
ash/edu-645-week-1-discussion-2-standards-
and-objectives-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
a. Describe the purpose of a learning standard
(referred to as a goal in Chapter 1) and the critical
components of a learning objective.
How would you differentiate between the two if
attempting to explain it to somebody else?
What is the relationship between formative
assessments during instruction and the standards
and objectives of that lesson?
b. Take the challenge Karen Lea presents in her
blog article Meaningful Connections: Objectives
and Standards. Select a grade level standard and
design two learning objectives AND a way to assess
students FOR learning for each objective. Be sure
to use the criteria for writing high-quality
objectives as discussed in your assigned reading
and videos.

2. Guided Response: Respond to at least one
classmate with objectives and assessment ideas in
the same grade range you chose (Pre-K-2nd, 3-5, 6-
8, 9-12, and other) and one with objectives and
assessment ideas in a completely different grade
range.
Are their objectives clear and measurable?
Do they identify specifically, what the STUDENT
will be doing and how?
Are they aligned (related) to the given standard?
It is important to remember professionalism in
your feedback. You are to give constructive
feedback by giving the author a different lens with
which to view their original ideas. Therefore,
provide them with a specific suggestion for making
their objective and/or assessment more complex
according to Bloom’s Taxonomy
Note: Before the last day of the week, you are
expected to provide a secondary response to any
comments or questions your instructor may have
provided. This is part of the grading criteria as a
demonstration of critical thinking.