Week 1· Organizational Theory read all sections from Why Study .docx

Week 1
· Organizational Theory: read all sections from Why Study
Organizational Theory, Classical Perspectives, Behavioral
Perspectives, Modern Thinking, and Evolving Organizations
· Organizational Theory Timeline (This timeline is an outline of
the Schools of Thought and the theorists who proposed their
philosophies of management since the early 1900's to current
day. This timeline is important in completing Assignment #1
due in week 3). Note: This document provides snippets of brief
information and is not meant to be the only source document
used to complete Assignment 1.
· Accelerate! The Evolution of the 21st Century Organization
· Introduction to Management: Current Challenges in
Management - read all sections
· Organizational Structure: Trends in Organization: read all
sections
· Diversity in a Global Business World: Diversity in
Organizations - read section Trends in Organizational Diversity
· History of Management Thought
Week 2
· Organizational Culture and Innovation: read all sections
from Adapting and Innovating, Technology and
Innovation, Managing Change for Organizations, and Managing
Change for Employees
· Strategic Management: Internal Analysis Inputs to Strategy -
read section Porter's Competitive Strategies
· Organizational Capability - Creating Competitive Advantage
· Adaptability: The New Competitive Advantage
· Building a Learning Organization
· Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building
strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st
century
· Competitive Advantage in the Enterprise Performance

Week 3
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-
management/chapter/internal-analysis-inputs-to-strategy/
management/chapter/strategic-management/
management/chapter/defining-leadership/
https://www.diffen.com/difference/Mission_Statement_vs_Visio
n_Statement
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/purpose-mission-vision-
statements-strategic-planning-13161.html
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/develop-strategic-planning-
vision-statements-4501.html
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/vision-mission-statement-
30844.html
Week 4
Strategic Management: Internal Analysis Inputs to Strategy -
read section SWOT Analysis
SWOT Analysis
· Strategic Management: Planning Tools - read sections Goal
Setting, Management by Objectives, and SMART Goals
· Strategic Management: Strategic Management - read sections
The Importance of Strategy, and Making Strategy Effective
Project 2 Group Project Due Week 5
In this group project your team will begin to learn about the
elements of strategic planning. Specifically, students will

complete an external environmental analysis and an internal
environmental analysis. For an organization to do a
comprehensive analysis both the external and internal analysis
must be completed. The external environment consists of
variables that an organization cannot control whereas the
internal environment consists of controllable
variable. Assessing both the external and internal environments
helps develop strategies that create a competitive
advantage for an organization. An organization wants to
leverage its internal strengths and take advantage of external
opportunities.
In this project, your group will complete a SWOT analysis, a
PESTLE analysis and a Porter’s Five Forces analysis for
BIOTECH. You will then discuss the relationship between
these assessment tools and the company’s vision statement
and mission statement in developing a strategic plan. Lastly,
you will provide a convincing argument as to why the new
project meets the strategic plan and why Biotech is well
positioned for the future in the nutraceuticals and supplements
market.
The instructor will create teams of no more than four team
members. If your team has less than four member, it is still
possible to complete the project. If for some reason, the
members of your group decide to drop the course and you are
the only member, you will contact the instructor immediately so
that you can be moved to an active group. You may not
move to another group because you are unhappy with your team
members. You may also not do the project as an
individual.
You will act as a self-managed team, which means you are
accountable for all of the requirements of the
assignment. You team may assign roles and responsibilities.
Each member is responsible to meet the requirements of

timeline of the project. If a team member does not complete his
or her work, it is the responsibility of the other team
members to complete that work. If a team does not meet the
deadlines for the project, the Late Assignment policy will
apply.
At the end of the project, each team member will complete a
Peer Evaluation Form. If you fail to complete the form, a
zero will be assigned for the grade. Each member should
complete the Peer Evaluation Form accurately.
NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work. You
may not use any work from another student, the
Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to
understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism
Policy, and know that it is your responsibility to learn about
instructor and general academic expectations with
regard to proper citation of sources as specified in the APA
Publication Manual, 6th Ed. (Students are held
accountable for in-text citations and an associated reference list
only).
Read the following scenario:
Valerie Harper has often been responsible for the development
of new products based on what marketing considers high
target markets. Valerie has recently been handed the research
results on Biotech’s customer demographics. Based on
the research, the Marketing Department would like to see
Biotech develop products geared toward the baby boomer
market.
From reviewing the research, Valerie noted that Biotech has

done little development of the over 50 customer
demographics. The current Biotech line has a few joint
supplement products and vitamins targeted toward this age
group
but nothing more. Valerie researched the trends and found high
blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes and
Alzheimer’s/dementia were a few of the major health concerns
for the over 50 customers. Further research revealed
clinically proven effects of hibiscus tea on reducing blood
pressure. This finding led Valerie to consider developing a
product that was all-natural, good tasting, and competitive with
existing teas. The tea would be pre-made and packaged
in paper cartons with coated sealant. The plan is to promote the
tea as natural products for green accountability. The tea
container would include a straw so potential tooth erosion from
the acidic tea could be minimized.
Valerie also thought about other products that might be
appealing to baby boomers. She came across several ideas. The
first is a protein bar that was made with coconut, dark
chocolate, almonds, and blueberries. The bar would contains
all-
natural products that would increase the protection of brain
function through protective antioxidants, thus protecting
against dementia and Alzheimer’s. A second bar would contain
natural herbs and would be developed with help from a
vendor located in India, which helps lower blood sugar in Type
2 diabetes.
Valerie named the test line Boomers Best Bets for the purposes
of development. Having come up with samples of the
products, costs and overall descriptions of the products, Valerie
and the head of marketing were now ready to approach
the Strategic Planning Committee with their new product ideas.
Valerie put together a team including a person from
Marketing, Production, and Quality Control to review the

products and decide how to position the products for acceptance
by the Strategic Planning Committee.
Instructions
Step 1: Role as a Member of the Pitch Team
Your team is part of Valerie’s Pitch Team and has been tasked
with creating PowerPoint presentation that Valerie will use
to “pitch” the Boomers Best Bets to the Strategic Planning
Committee.
Valerie has given detailed instructions for the PowerPoint
presentation. Make sure to follow the instructions. To better
prepare you for the tasks at hand, you will:
assess the external environment of the business;
looking at
the Company Profile;
analysis.
For the purpose of this project assume that budget and financial
issues can be reasonably met.
Step 2: The PowerPoint Presentation
The PowerPoint presentation must include the following:

the purpose of the presentation;
Forces analysis;
atements with an
explanation of how the vision and mission of the Biotech
works in concert with the SWOT analysis, PESTLE analysis,
and Porter’s Five Forces analysis to help develop a
strategic plan for the company’s future;
to why:
o Boomer’s Best Bets meets the strategic plan suggested by the
total analysis;
o Biotech has a strong position for a future in the
nutraceuticals and supplements market.
Step 3: Preparations for the Power Point Presentation
To prepare for creating the PowerPoint presentation, your team
will:
-managed group;
and supplement market to gain a thorough
understanding of what will need to be placed in the
presentation;
of each person’s research and determine what key

information will be part of the presentation;
in the presentation;
the final presentation.
Step 4: Review the Presentation
Read through the slides to ensure all required elements are
present. Use the grading rubric to ensure that you gain the
most points possible for this assignment.
Proofread the slides for spelling and grammatical issues, and
third person writing.
measure;
paper;
(EWC). The EWC will provide 4-6 areas that may
need improvement.
Step 5: Submit the Presentation in the Assignment Folder (The
assignment submitted to the Assignment Folder will
be considered the student's final product and therefore ready for
grading by the instructor. It is incumbent upon the
student to verify the assignment is the correct submission. No
exceptions will be considered by the instructor).

How to Set Up the Presentation
Create a PowerPoint Presentation with no more than 15 slides,
which includes the title page and reference page.
Use the following resource to learn how to create a PowerPoint
presentation:
How to Create a Winning PowerPoint Presentation
Completing the Presentation
rubric while completing the project to ensure all
requirements are met that will lead to the highest possible
grade.
there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first
person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second
person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third
person, view this link:
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-
second-and-third-person.
them.
means you do not use more than four consecutive
words from a source document, but put a passage from a source
document into your own words and attribute the
passage to the source document. Not using direct quotation
marks means that there should be no passages with
quotation marks and instead the source material is paraphrased

as stated above. Provide the page or paragraph
number when using in-text citations. Note that a reference
within a reference list cannot exist without an
associated in-text citation and vice versa.
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-create-a-winning-
powerpoint-presentation-2011-2
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-
second-and-third-person
pected to use the facts from the case scenario
paired with the weekly courses readings to develop the
analysis and support the reasoning. The expectation is that you
provide a robust use of the course readings. If
any material is used from a source document, it must be cited
and referenced.
Grade Rubric

Criteria Above Average Sufficient Developing
Needs
Improvement
Failure
Introductio
n
1.15 points
Writes an introduction
that captures the
reader's attention,
explains the purpose
of the presentation
clearly, correctly, and
concisely.
(1.035 - 1.15)
0.9775 points
Writes an

introduction that
explains the
purpose of the
presentation
correctly but
needs minor
clarity or
development.
(0.92 - 1.034)
0.8625 points
Writes an
introduction that
provides a general
idea of the purpose
of the
presentation. Needs
more development.

(0.805 - 0.91)
0.7475 points
Writes an
introduction
that provides a
general idea of
the purpose of
the presentation
or needs
significant
development.
(0.69 - 0.804)
0 points
No
attempt at
presenting
an

introduction.
(0)
Developme
nt of SWOT
Analysis
2.3 points
Response
demonstrates
understanding of all
components of a
SWOT analysis and
1.955 points
Response
demonstrates
understanding of
all components of
a SWOT analysis

1.725 points
Response
demonstrates
components of a
SWOT analysis and
1.495 points
Response
demonstrates
understanding
of all
components of
0 points
Little to no
attempt at
presenting a

includes insightful
analysis of all four
quadrants of the
chosen company’s
SWOT. Minimum of
four items are listed
per quadrant. A
discussion of how the
company can turn a
weakness into
strength and takes
advantage of an
opportunity is clearly
detailed. All
elements correctly
presented and
reasoning and

conclusions made are
well supported with
the course material
and case scenario
facts.
(2.07 - 2.3)
and includes
insightful analysis
of all four
quadrants of the
chosen company’s
SWOT. Minimum
of three items are
listed per
quadrant. A
discussion of how
the company can
turn a weakness

into strength and
takes advantage
of an opportunity
is clearly detailed
OR response
demonstrates
understanding of
most components
of a SWOT
analysis. A
discussion of how
the company can
turn a weakness
includes insightful
quadrants of the
chosen company’s
SWOT. Minimum of

two items are listed
per quadrant. A
discussion of how
the company can
turn a weakness into
strength and takes
advantage of an
opportunity is
provided OR
response is generic
and not
insightful. How the
company can turn a
weakness into a
strength and turned
into an opportunity
is mentioned but not
detailed. Analysis

needs some
development or
a SWOT analysis
and includes
insightful
analysis of all
four quadrants
of the chosen
company’s
SWOT. Minimum
of two items are
listed per
quadrant. A
discussion of
how the
company can
turn a weakness
into strength

and takes
advantage of an
opportunity is
provided OR not
all the areas of
the SWOT are
addressed. List
is generic and
not
SWOT
analysis.
(0 - 1.37)
into strength and
take advantage of
an opportunity is
detailed. Analysis
needs minor

development
and/or
correction. Uses
course material
and facts from
case scenario but
analysis needs
more support of
reasoning/conclus
ions made.
(1.84 - 2.06)
several errors
noted. Limited use
of course material
and case scenario
facts that does not
well support
reasoning and

conclusions – may
rely on facts only.
(1.61 - 1.83)
insightful. How
the company
can turn a
weakness into
strength and
take advantage
of an
opportunity
barely touched
on or
incorrectly
presented. Anal
ysis needs
significant
development or

many errors
noted. Little
use of course
material and
case scenario
facts or course
material/facts
from case
scenario
presented but
does not
support
reasoning and
conclusions.
(1.38 - 1.60)
Developme
nt of

PESTLE
Analysis
2.3 points
Includes all 6
elements of the
PESTLE, explains each
element, and provides
insightful analysis
that emphasizes how
each element affects
the business and its
success, and
identifies various
stakeholders and how
they impact the
business or are
impacted by the
business. All

elements correctly
1.955 points
Includes all 6
elements of the
PESTLE, explains
each element, and
provides an
analysis
about how each
element affects
the business and
its success, and
identifies various
stakeholders and
how they impact
the business or
1.725 points

Response
demonstrates
components of a
SWOT analysis and
includes insightful
quadrants of the
chosen company’s
SWOT. Minimum of
two items are listed
per quadrant. A
discussion of how
the company can
turn a weakness into
strength and takes
1.495 points

Includes all 6
elements of the
PESTLE and
does not
demonstrate a
clear
understanding
of how each
element affects
the business
and its
success. Does
not discuss
stakeholders or
mentions
stakeholders
0 points

Does not
discuss the
PESTLE or
does not
discuss
several of the
elements.
(0 - 1.37)
presented and
reasoning and
well supported with
the course material
and case scenario
facts.
(2.07 - 2.3)
are impacted by

the business but
minor
development
and/or correction
is needed. Uses
course material
and facts from
case scenario but
analysis needs
more support of
reasoning/conclus
ions made.
(1.84 - 2.06)
advantage of an
opportunity is
provided OR
response is generic
and not

insightful. How the
company can turn a
weakness into a
strength and turned
into an opportunity
is mentioned but not
detailed. Analysis
needs some
development or
several errors
noted. Limited use
of course material
and case scenario
facts that does not
well support
reasoning and
conclusions – may
rely on facts only.

without
discussing in
any detail. May
discuss several
of the elements
of the PESTLE in
detail but not
all of
them. Analysis
needs
significant
development or
many errors
noted. Little
use of course
material and
case scenario
facts or course

material/facts
from case
scenario
presented but
does not
support
(1.61 - 1.83) reasoning and
conclusions.
(1.38 - 1.60)
Developme
nt of
Porter's
Five Forces
2.3 points
Insightful analysis
that demonstrates
how each of the

identified factors
affect the company
and its industry,
assesses company’s
strategic position,
competitiveness, and
the attractiveness of
the company. All
elements correctly
presented and
reasoning and
well supported with
the course material
1.955 points
Insightful analysis
that demonstrates

how each of the
identified factors
affect the
company and its
industry, assesses
company’s
strategic position,
competitiveness,
and the
attractiveness of
the
company. Analysi
s needs minor
development and
or correction.
Uses course
1.725 points
Demonstrates a

generic analysis that
is not insightful
about how each of
the identified factors
affect the company
and its industry,
assesses company’s
strategic position,
competitiveness, and
the attractiveness of
the
company. Analysis
needs some
development or
several errors
noted. Limited use
of course material
1.495 points

Demonstrates a
generic analysis
that is not
insightful about
how each of the
identified
factors affect
the company
and its industry,
assesses
company’s
strategic
position,
competitiveness
, and the
attractiveness
of the

company. Anal
0 points
Little to no
attempt at
presenting a
SWOT
analysis.
(0- 1.37)
and case scenario
facts.
(2.07 - 2.3)
material and facts
from case
scenario but
analysis needs
more support of
reasoning/conclus

ions made.
(1.84 - 2.06)
and case scenario
facts that does not
well support
reasoning and
conclusions – may
rely on facts only.
(1.61 - 1.83)
ysis needs
significant
development or
many errors
noted. Little
use of course
material and
case scenario
facts or course

material/facts
from case
scenario
presented but
does not
support
reasoning and
conclusions.
(1.38 - 1.60)
Vision and
Mission
Statements
1.15 points
Insightful discussion
of the vision and
mission statements
0.9775 points

Insightful
discussion of the
vision and
0.8625 points
Demonstrates an
analysis that is not
insightful about the
0.7475 points
0 points
Little to no
attempt
at discussing
explaining how the
vision and mission of
Biotech works in

concert with the three
analyses to help
develop the strategic
plan for company’s
future. All elements
correctly presented
and reasoning and
well supported with
the course material
and case scenario
facts.
(1.035 - 1.15)
mission
statements
explaining how
the vision and
mission of Biotech

works in concert
with the three
analyses to help
develop the
strategic plan for
company’s
future. Analysis
needs minor
development and
or correction.
Uses course
material and facts
from case
scenario but
analysis needs
more support of
reasoning/conclus
ions made.

vision and mission
statements
explaining how the
vision and mission of
Biotech works in
concert with the
three analyses to
help develop the
strategic plan for
company’s
future. Analysis
needs some
development or
several errors
noted. Limited use
of course material
and case scenario
facts that does not

well support
reasoning and
conclusions – may
rely on facts only.
(0.805 - 0.91)
Demonstrates
an analysis that
is not insightful
about the vision
and mission
statements
explaining how
the vision and
mission of
Biotech works in
concert with the
three analyses
to help develop

the strategic
plan for
company’s
future. Analysis
needs
significant
development or
many errors
noted. Little
use of course
material and
case scenario
Biotech's
vision and
mission
statements
and how the
vision and

mission
works in
concert with
the three
analyses
tools.
(0)
(0.92 - 1.034) facts or course
material/facts
from case
scenario
presented but
does not
support
reasoning and
conclusions.
(0.69 - 0.804)

Argument
for
Boomer’s
Best Bets
2.3 points
Well-developed
argumentative points
that directly support
the
claim/position. Supp
orting examples are
concrete and detailed.
Commentary is logical
and well-thought-
out. Counter claims
acknowledge
1.955 points

Most
argumentative
points are related
to the thesis, but
one may lack
sufficient support
or deviates from
claim. Counter
claims
acknowledge
opposing
1.725 points
More than one
argumentative point
lacks sufficient
details and
support. Attempts to

address one or more
opposing arguments,
but may not refute
the opposition clearly
or
adequately. Conclusi
1.495 points
Most
argumentative
points are
poorly
developed.
Counter claims
are missing or
vague.
Commentary is
0 points

Little to no
attempt
at presenting
an argument
for Boomer's
Best Bet.
(0 - 1.37)
opposing viewpoints
clearly and skillfully.
Conclusion re-visits
the claim in a new
way and applies the
position
universally. The reas
oning and
well supported with

the course material
and case scenario
facts.
(2.07 - 2.3)
viewpoint(s) with
some logic and
clarity. Conclusion
summarizes the
claim and key
points with some
“fresh”
commentary
present. Uses
course material
and facts from
case scenario but
argument needs
more support of

reasoning/conclus
ions made.
(1.84 - 2.06)
on mirrors
introduction too
closely, with little or
no new commentary
on the writer’s
claim/position. Limit
ed use of course
material and case
scenario facts that do
not well support
reasoning and
conclusions – may
rely on facts only.
(1.61 - 1.83)
not present.

Conclusion
does not re-
visit the claim
or summarize
key
argumentative
point(s). Little
use of course
material and
case scenario
facts or course
material/facts
from case
scenario
presented but
does not
support
reasoning and

conclusions.
(1.38 - 1.60)
Argument
for Biotech
2.3 points
1.955 points
1.725 points
1.495 points
0 points
having a
strong
position
for a future
in the

nutraceutic
als and
supplemen
ts market.
Well-developed
argumentative points
that directly support
the
claim/position. Supp
orting examples are
concrete and detailed.
Commentary is logical
and well-thought-
out. Counter claims
acknowledge
opposing viewpoints
clearly and skillfully.
Conclusion re-visits

the claim in a new
way and applies the
position
universally. The reas
oning and
well supported with
the course material
and case scenario
facts.
Most
argumentative
points are related
to the thesis, but
one may lack
sufficient support
or deviates from
claim. Counter

claims
acknowledge
opposing
viewpoint(s) with
some logic and
clarity. Conclusion
summarizes the
claim and key
points with some
“fresh”
commentary
present. Uses
course material
and facts from
case scenario but
argument needs
More than one
argumentative point

lacks sufficient
details and
support. Attempts to
address one or more
opposing arguments,
but may not refute
the opposition clearly
or
adequately. Conclusi
on mirrors
introduction too
closely, with little or
no new commentary
on the writer’s
claim/position. Limit
ed use of course
material and case
scenario facts that do

not well support
reasoning and
conclusions – may
rely on facts only.
Most
argumentative
points are
poorly
developed.
Counter claims
are missing or
vague.
Commentary is
not present.
Conclusion
does not re-
visit the claim

or summarize
key
argumentative
point(s). Little
use of course
material and
case scenario
facts or course
material/facts
from case
Little to no
attempt
at presenting
an argument
for Boomer's
Best Bet.
(0 - 1.37)

(2.07 - 2.3) more support of
reasoning/conclus
ions made.
(1.84 - 2.06)
(1.61 - 1.83) scenario
presented but
does not
support
reasoning and
conclusions.
(1.38 - 1.60)
Slides:
Informatio
n Balance
2.3 points
Each slide outlines or
supplements a major
point or details a

previous point. Does
not visually overload
or contain small font
– all text clearly
visible. Ten to 30
words per
slide. Completely
logical sequence of
ideas.
(2.07 - 2.3)
1.955 points
Most slides
outline or
supplement a
major point. Most
slides do not
visually overload

or contain small
font – all words
clearly
visible. Eight – 40
words on a few
slides. Sequence
1.725 points
Some slides outline
or supplement a
major point. Most
slides do not visually
overload or contain
small font –words
clearly visible. Six –
45 words on a few
slides. Hard to tell
where talk was

heading sometimes.
1.495 points
Few slides
outline or
supplement a
major
point. Slides
often visually
overload or
contain small
font – all words
clearly
visible. Too
many or too few
words on a
slide. Direction
0 points

Talk quite
difficult to
follow. Slide
s typically
confusing or
presented in
illogical
order.
(0 - 1.37)
of ideas mostly
logical.
(1.84 - 2.06)
(1.61 - 1.83) of talk hard to
follow.
(1.38 - 1.60)
Slides:
Presentatio

n and
Language
2.3 points
Presentation flows
well and logically;
transitions are
smooth, interesting
and enhance
presentation. No
grammatical or
spelling errors.
(2.07 - 2.3)
1.955 points
Presentation flows
well; smooth
transitions used
on most slides. A

few grammatical
or spelling errors.
(1.84 - 2.06)
1.725 points
Presentation flows
well; smooth
transitions used on
some slides. Several
grammatical or
spelling errors.
(1.61 - 1.83)
1.495 points
Presentation is
unorganized;
very few
transitions
and/or they

distract from
presentation. M
any
grammatical or
spelling errors.
(1.38 - 1.60)
0 points
Presentation
has no flow;
no
transitions
used
(0 - 1.37)
Attention
to
Instruction
s
2.3 points

The paper contains
completion of all major
assignment tasks. The
paper also includes
1.955 points
The paper contains
completion of all
major assignment
tasks. The paper
1.725 points
The paper missed one
major assignment task
or two minor aspects of
the assignment.
1.495 points
The paper
missed two major
assignment, one
major assignment
0 points

The paper
missed three or
more major
completion of all minor
aspects of the
assignment such as use
of page/paragraph
number, third person
writing, required use of
course readings,
outside sources if
needed, and
assignment format.
(2.07 – 2.3)
missed one minor
aspect of the
assignment such as
use of
page/paragraph
number, third
person writing,

required use of
course readings,
outside sources if
needed, and
assignment format.
(1.84 – 2.06)
(1.61 – 1.83) task & one
minor tasks, or
three or more
minor aspects of
the assignments.
(1.38 - 1.60)
assignment
tasks.
(0 – 1.37)
Writing
Mechanics
1.15 points
Strictly adheres to
standard usage rules of
written English using
paragraphs and

sentence rather than
bullets, including but not
limited to capitalization,
punctuation, run-on
sentences, missing or
extra words, stylistic
errors, spelling and
grammatical errors. No
contractions or jargon
0.9775 points
Excellently adheres
to standard usage
of mechanics:
conventions of
written English,
including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. Three to
six errors noted.
(0.92 – 1.034)
0.8625 points
Satisfactorily adheres

to standard usage rules
of mechanics:
conventions of English,
including capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. Seven to
10 errors noted.
(0.805 – 0.91)
0.7475 points
Minimally
adheres to
standard usage
rules of
mechanics:
conventions of
written English,
including
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling. More
than 10 errors
found.
0 points

Does not
adhere to
standard
usage rules of
mechanics:
conventions of
written English
largely
incomprehensi
ble, or errors
are too
plentiful to
count.
used. Zero to two
errors noted.
(1.035 - 1.15)
(0.69 – 0.804) (0 – 0.68)
APA Style
(6th ed.)
1.15 points

1 - 2 APA style or usage
errors; Proper citation
of source material is
used throughout the
slides and note
section; Reference
titles follow APA with
only the first word, the
first word after a colon
and proper nouns
capitalized.
(1.035 - 1.15)
0.9775 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference list but 3 -
4 APA style errors
noted in slides or
note section, or fails
to use APA citations
when appropriate 1
- 2 times throughout
slides and note
section.

(0.92 – 1.034)
0.8625 points
Attempts in-text
citations and reference
lists; APA style errors
are noted
throughout slides and
note section with 5 - 6
errors noted; Fails to
use APA citations
when appropriate 3 - 4
times in slides and note
section.
(0.805 – 0.91)
0.7475 points
Attempts in-text
citations and
reference lists;
Fails to use APA
citation when
appropriate 5 -
6 times in slides

and note section;
presents a total
of 1 - 2 in-text
citations and
reference list
in slides or note
section
when requires
APA citations are
needed
throughout the
presentation.
(0.69 – 0.804)
0 points
No attempt
at APA style;
or attempts
either in-text
citations or
reference list
but omits the
other.

Week 1· Organizational Theory read all sections from Why Study .docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Week 1· Organizational Theory read all sections from Why Study .docx

Similar to Week 1· Organizational Theory read all sections from Why Study .docx (17)

More from celenarouzie

More from celenarouzie (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Week 1· Organizational Theory read all sections from Why Study .docx