4. The Upper Platte River Basin
Fully Appropriated Area
Source: dnr.nebraska.gov/iwm/upper-platte (last accessed 12/28/2016)
5. The Upper Platte River Basin
Over-Appropriated Area
Source: dnr.nr.gov/iwm/upbwp (last accessed 12/29/2016)
6. Integrated Management Plans
Over Appropriated Areas
LB 962 motivated by need to get ahead of the PRRIP
IMPs developed jointly with NRDs
IMPs = no new or expanded ground water wells
IMPs must offset new depletions and/or uses after July 1, 1997
IMPs developed after consultation w/stakeholders
Upper Platte Basin Plan first developed in 2009
Upper Platte Basin planning process starting new ten year cycle
IMP and Basin Wide planning process is “bottom-up”
7. Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
Nebraska New Depletion Plan
USFWS “target flows” to restore critical habitat
NE agreed to prevent/mitigate new depletions to target flows caused
by new and expanded uses of water (effects going back to 7/1/1997)
DNR negotiates with NRDs to share in offsets to depletions whose
effects date back to 1997
Responsibility for offsets to groundwater (GW) in hydrologically
connected (HC) areas.
HC area = cumulative stream depletion over 40 years > 28 percent
total GW consumed from wells.
8. Governance of the Upper Platte River Basin
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (2007)
Extensive system of water diversion and storage
Critical habitat designation of Big Bend Reach
Cooperative Agreement (Interior, NE, CO, WY)
Governance Committee (Interior, NE, CO, WY, NRDs/CNPPID/NPPD, Environmental)
LB 962 (2004) anticipated the PRRIP
Integrated Management Plans
Required where basins over-appropriated/fully appropriated
DNR designates/determines status
IMPs jointly developed between DNR and NRDs
Basin-Wide Plan required for over-appropriated portions of Platte River Basin
Meets NDP requirement
9. A Polycentric Governance Systems
A POLYCENTRIC SYSTEM OF GOVERNANCE HAS MULTIPLE OVERLAPPING
JURISDICTIONS AT DIFFERENT SCALES, EACH WITH SOME INDEPENDENT
AUTHORITY OVER PARTICULAR ISSUES OR FUNCTIONAL AREAS.
A POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE SYSTEM HAS INTERDEPENDENT CENTERS
OF AUTHORITY, EACH WITH QUALIFIED INDEPENDENCE OVER ITS OWN
FUNCTIONAL AREA.
A POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE SYSTEM IS OFTEN DESCRIBED AS SELF-
ORGANIZED, ARISING IN A BOTTOM UP FASHION, WITH NEW
BOUNDARIES THAT CAN MATCH THE SCALE OF THE ISSUE AT HAND, SUCH
AS A WATERSHED.
POLYCENTRICITY PROMOTES INTERACTIONS UP AND DOWN LEVELS OF
GOVERNANCE AND PROMOTES INSTITUTIONS THAT CAN ADAPT TO
CHANGES IN SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS.
10. A Polycentric System of Water Governance
PRIPP Governance
DNR
CNPPID Municipalities
NPPD Environmental
NRDs
12. The Upper Platte River Basin
Over-Appropriated Area
Source: dnr.nr.gov/iwm/upbwp (last accessed 12/29/2016)
13. Central Platte NRD
Partnerships
Partnerships with three canal companies within the NRD involve
purchase or lease agreements to rehabilitate each canal and store
excess stream flows for recharge and return to the Platte.
Helps to meet requirements of LB 962 to return Platte River to its
1997 level of use determined to be 3,400 AFY.
Leasing water formerly used for irrigation to the PRRIP
Using other portion of recharge/return credit for NDP
14. Central Platte NRD
Water Bank
First NRD to establish a water bank
The NRD purchases water rights to offset new uses
Landowner “donates” water rights
Owner restricted to dryland farming
NRD compensates (willing) seller
Price = cost per AF impact on river
NRD holds permanent conservation easement
Avoided need to regulate ground water use
15. Lessons Learned
Questions for Future Research
I. Nebraska’s approach to integrated water management is unique
among the fifty states. Nebraska’s IMP process is “bottom up” with
DNR facilitating the development and implementation of NRD
plans.
II. Polycentric governance systems promote capacity to adapt to
changing environmental conditions. Polycentric governance
systems create opportunities to interact across different scales.