essay/02_Template_Essay.docx Title of Essay Your Full Name I. Introduction II. Summary of the Case III. Personal Feelings on the Issue IV. Stakeholders V. Act Utilitarian VI. Rawls’ Theory of Justice VII. Rule Utilitarian VIII. Moral Rights IX. Social Contract X. Kant XI. Summary/Conclusion XII. References It is required that you include these components in your Essay, in the correct order and including the Roman numeral reference to each (I, II, III, etc.) essay/03_CSC208_Essay_Assignment_draft.docx Essay Rough Draft Page 1 of 4 Essay Rough Draft Page 1 of 4 Essay Rough Draft Page 1 of 4 CSC 208 Outline for Ethical Analysis Essay Assignment Rough Draft Worth 50 points You will receive 50 points if you submit a complete paper on time. Complete paper means no parts missing. This is a writing-to-learn essay. You are encouraged to visit the Writing Center for assistance: http://condor.depaul.edu/~writing/ Important information: 1. The average paper length is 6 pages, but can be as long as it takes to meet the criteria. 2. You should NOT provide an explanation of the philosophy behind each framework. Assume your reader knows the philosophy. 3. However, you must apply the frameworks and show the steps, including the problems with the philosophy. 4. Your paper should be typed in Microsoft Word, or similar text editor, doubled-spaced, Times New Roman type, and 12pt 5. Your paper must be cited correctly in the style of your choice. See MLA Examples at the end of this document. 6. You must use the outline given. The outline of your paper must be as follows: I. Introduction II. Summary of The Case III. Personal Feelings on The Issue IV. Stakeholders V. Act Utilitarian VI. Rawls’ Theory of Justice VII. Rule Utilitarian VIII. Moral Rights IX. Social Contract X. Kant XI. Summary/Conclusion XII. References Explanation of Outline I. Introduction Clearly state, in one sentence, the single ethical issue you are addressing. II. Summary of the case you are examining in your own words. III. Discuss your personal feelings on the issue. IV. List and discuss all the stakeholders (This is the part of the paper where you list and describe all parties that have a stake in the outcome of the issue you are addressing.) a) List each and discuss why they are stakeholders b) Did you leave anyone out and why? V. Apply the act utilitarian framework exactly the way we did in lab, including addressing all the problems with the philosophy/proof. VI. Apply Rawls’ Theory of Justice exactly the way we did in lab, including addressing all the problems with the philosophy/proof. VII. Apply the rule utilitarian framework exactly the way we did in lab, including addressing all the problems with the philosophy/proof. VIII. Apply the moral rights procedure exactly the way we did in lab, including addressing all the problems with the ...

1. essay/02_Template_Essay.docx
Title of Essay
Your Full Name
I. Introduction
II. Summary of the Case
III. Personal Feelings on the Issue
IV. Stakeholders
V. Act Utilitarian
VI. Rawls’ Theory of Justice
VII. Rule Utilitarian
VIII. Moral Rights
IX. Social Contract
X. Kant
XI. Summary/Conclusion
XII. References
It is required that you include these components in your Essay,
in the correct order and including the Roman numeral reference
to each (I, II, III, etc.)
essay/03_CSC208_Essay_Assignment_draft.docx
Essay Rough Draft Page 1 of 4
Essay Rough Draft Page 1 of 4
Essay Rough Draft Page 1 of 4
CSC 208
Outline for Ethical Analysis Essay Assignment Rough Draft
Worth 50 points
You will receive 50 points if you submit a complete paper on
time.
Complete paper means no parts missing.

2. This is a writing-to-learn essay.
You are encouraged to visit the Writing Center for assistance:
http://condor.depaul.edu/~writing/
Important information:
1. The average paper length is 6 pages, but can be as long as it
takes to meet the criteria.
2. You should NOT provide an explanation of the philosophy
behind each framework. Assume your reader knows the
philosophy.
3. However, you must apply the frameworks and show the steps,
including the problems with the philosophy.
4. Your paper should be typed in Microsoft Word, or similar
text editor, doubled-spaced, Times New Roman type, and 12pt
5. Your paper must be cited correctly in the style of your
choice.
See MLA Examples at the end of this document.
6. You must use the outline given.
The outline of your paper must be as follows:
I. Introduction
II. Summary of The Case
III. Personal Feelings on The Issue
IV. Stakeholders
V. Act Utilitarian
VI. Rawls’ Theory of Justice
VII. Rule Utilitarian
VIII. Moral Rights
IX. Social Contract
X. Kant
XI. Summary/Conclusion
XII. References
Explanation of Outline

3. I. Introduction
Clearly state, in one sentence, the single ethical issue you are
addressing.
II. Summary of the case you are examining in your own words.
III. Discuss your personal feelings on the issue.
IV. List and discuss all the stakeholders
(This is the part of the paper where you list and describe all
parties that have a stake in the outcome of the issue you are
addressing.)
a) List each and discuss why they are stakeholders
b) Did you leave anyone out and why?
V. Apply the act utilitarian framework exactly the way we did
in lab, including addressing all the problems with the
philosophy/proof.
VI. Apply Rawls’ Theory of Justice exactly the way we did in
lab, including addressing all the problems with the
philosophy/proof.
VII. Apply the rule utilitarian framework exactly the way we
did in lab, including addressing all the problems with the
philosophy/proof.
VIII. Apply the moral rights procedure exactly the way we did
in lab, including addressing all the problems with the
philosophy/proof.
IX. Apply the social contract procedure exactly the way we did
in the lab, including addressing all the problems with the
philosophy/proof.
X. Apply Kant’s 1st and 2nd formulations of his categorical
imperative exactly the way we did in lab, including indicating
the relevant duties and addressing all the problems with the
philosophy/proof.
XI. Summary/conclusion – should include the following:
a) Summary of paper
b) Compare the outcomes of applying all the frameworks. Are
the results different? Discuss.
c) You may restate your own opinions/feelings here. Have your

4. feelings changed?
XII. References
a) The case/movie/book you are analyzing
b) Sources for the frameworks (cite the readings)
Structure for MLA Citation description for handouts
Author of quoted source. "Title of work from a published
collection (e.g. poem or article)." Title of Publication. (book or
periodical). "Title of Handout." Handout.
Title of course. (Name of instructor.) Name of school. Date of
handout.
Note: If any of the above information is not given, leave the
information out.
Structure for MLA citations for websites – please include the
URL
Last, First M. “Article Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher,
Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
Retrieved from URL MLA Structure for a movie
Film title. Dir.First Name Last Name. Distributor, Year of
Release. Medium.
For example:
2001: A Space Odyssey. Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-
Mayer, 1968. Film.
MLA Citing a book in print
Last, First M. Book Title. City of Publication: Publisher, Year
Published. Print.
MLA Citing a book found in a database
Note: Some eBooks may be available online through your
library’s databases. Last, First M. Book Title. City: Publisher,
Year Published. Database Name. Web. Date Month Year
Accessed.
For example:
Lichter, S. Robert, and Stanley Rothman. Environmental
Cancer-A Political Disease?. New Haven, CT: Yale UP,

5. 1999. eBook Collection. Web. 1 Apr. 2013.
Sources from our readings in MLA Style (some examples)
Bentham, Jeremy. “Introduction to the Principles of Morals and
Legislation.” Some Texts from Early Modern Philosophy.
Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Annotated byJonathan
Bennett. www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/benthamAccessed
January 2017.
Birsch, Douglas. Introduction to Ethical Theories, A Procedural
Approach. Long Grove:Waveland Press, Inc., 2014. Print.
Hobbs, Thomas. “Leviathan.” Some Texts from Early Modern
Philosophy. Peter
Millican and Amyas Merivale. Annotated byJonathan
Bennett. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/hobbes.Accessed January
2017.
Kant, Immanuel. “Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals.”
Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Annotated byJonathan
Bennett. Web. 17 January 2017.
from
www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1785.pdfAccessed
January 2017.
Locke, John. “Second Treatise of Government.” Some Texts
from Early Modern Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas
Merivale. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/locke1689a_1.pdfAcces
sed January 2017.
Lulis, Evelyn. "Supplementary Handout Applied Ethics."
Handout. Ethics of Computing: Computer Science 208. 2014.
Print.

6. Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism.” Some Texts from Early
Modern Philosophy.
Peter Millican and Amyas Merivale. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/mill1863.pdfAccessed
January 2017.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “The Social Contract.” Some Texts
from Early Modern Philosophy. Peter Millican and Amyas
Merivale. Web. 17 January 2017.
www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/rousseauAccessed January
2017.
essay/04_final draft of essay.pdf
Page 1 of 2
CSC 208 Rules for resubmission of essays
This is called the ‘final version of midterm essay’
Worth 100 points
You must:
Submit your rewrite to D2L on Friday, May 22.
Points to remember:
This assignment requires you to rewrite your essay.
It is a full, next iteration.
You should:

7. • correct issues based on your returned ‘rough draft’
• check the paper’s organization
• check each paragraph’s organization
• check each sentence—watch word usage, grammar, etc.
You are encouraged to visit the Writing Center.
CSC 208 Rubrics for Grading the Ethical Analysis Paper
One course objective is for students to correctly apply the
frameworks, as this course
focuses on critical thinking.
The following general rules apply.
Your paper should:
1) meet the specifications –
a. use proper citation; you may use any style you want (MLA,
APA, Chicago
Manual, etc.)
b. write an analytical paper not an informative essay
c. clearly state the ethical issue you are addressing in the
introduction of the
paper.
d. have the facts of the case right
e. use the correct frameworks: rule utilitarian, act utilitarian,
social contract,
moral rights, Rawl’s Theory of Justice, and Kant’s 1st and 2nd
formulations of

8. the categorical imperative.
f. correctly apply the frameworks
g. pay careful attention to editing for correct grammar and
spelling
h. be well organized
Only exceptional papers meeting all the requirements will
receive an “A”.
Rubric Table
Grade Range Criteria
A all frameworks applied correctly with strong arguments
all criteria met
excellent writing
correct citations
B at least two frameworks applied correctly with strong
arguments
all criteria met
very good writing
correct citations
C at least one framework applied correctly
all criteria met
good writing
correct citations
D at least one framework applied correctly
most criteria met
correct citations

9. You must:Points to remember:You are encouraged to visit the
Writing Center.
essay/Midterm Topic Zihan Wang Update .docx
Zihan Wang
Midterm Topic
4/25/2020
Topic: Apple Inc. use of behavior biometrics to collect
information on logins.
Issue: Is it ethical for scanning users’ biological signs to
collecting users’ privacy information for the purpose of log in?
I need 100 words response to each discussion post
1) Systems and Professional
Integrity
One has to way which is more vital their obligation to the
community or to their client. As a counselor one is not
obligated to provide information to law enforcement unless it
causes risk to the client or others. Conferring to the American
Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists
and Code of Conduct (Links to an external site.)standard
4.05(b), Mental Health Professionals may reveal sensitive
details as allowed by law or where authorized by law for a

10. legitimate reason, such as supplying the requisite medical care,
without the permission of the patient; Receive reasonable
medical consultations; shield patients, physician or others of
danger; otherwise receive reimbursement from the customer for
care where transparency is restricted to the minimal required for
the intent to be accomplished.
They should have professional honesty and grow it, and be
dedicated to various establishments domestic, specialized, and
society which determines a sense of ethics (Eskridge, et al.
2012). In any case, most services that are not mandated by
statute or professional ethics to hold all details private do so,
both out of regard for the law and to maintain confidence with
participants. However, there are limited exceptions to absolute
secrecy. If the system staff member is a designated child
violence and neglect writer, whether the client presents a danger
to himself or to anyone, or if the staff member is recalled in a
court case; mutually the law and the ethical codes usually allow
a person to put his or her duties above his or her secrecy
obligation to the law or to the health of others. Privacy
requirements will be made known to applicants at the outset of
their participation in the project.
What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas is the kind of standard
one should abide by in the world of counseling. What occurs in
counseling remains in counseling unless a person poses a threat
to himself or others. Mental health professionals are held to
extremely strict professional requirements by their state board
of directors, and a breach of these rules may result in fines, lack
of licensure, or even incarceration. Although each state has its
own collection of rules and legislation for what is needed to
disclose to its behavioral health practitioners, there are similar
patterns that overlap nationally.
2) Once I used to work in a community violence program means
that I am obligated to help and protect the kids that trust me
from any danger. In this case, the kids completely trust me such

11. that they offer information of their less-than-savory times. The
police may seek the information I gather but I have to protect
the kids. I have to protect the confidentially of these kids as
they need the help to get help through the Program (Braye, and
Preston-Shoot, 2016) When releasing any information, I have to
be clear on why am releasing the specific info.
However, I must comply with the mandatory reporting laws. I
cannot disclose information to anyone without a written consent
of the individual unless he or she is a danger to herself or
others, whereby am expected to inform the authority of such
cases. These laws are generated to create an understanding of
the obligation where I am expected to bring the facts to the
attention of the authority that made the verdict (Juujärvi,
Kallunki, and Luostari, 2020). Besides I also must ensure that I
carefully generate a balance to the disclosure through the
ethical obligation to ensure that the confidentiality of the
participants is safeguarded.
Issues concerning the society, yet they are not directly involved
with the areas am concerned with are not my concern. I could
only raise the issue to the professions involved to make sure
that they are informed concerning the information. However, I
have to maintain professional boundaries to ensure that the
program is a success. Each person in the field is assigned
according to his or her area of competence and not engaging in
other issues would ensure that it does not affect the professional
responsibilities (Kaplan, Bryan, and Sanders, 2017). However,
if it endangers my community intervention, I would collaborate
with the other professionals to ensure there are no ethical
conflicts. I would also be able to evade causing as much harm
as good. I can only engage in an action that ultimately reduces
the barriers and promoting the betterment of the society.