How Did Henry Viii Influence The Colonies

How Did Henry Viii Influence The Colonies
The English Reformation began in 1634, it had large influences on the settlement and the policies of
the North American colonies. Henry VIII had a large influence on the rules as he wanted to receive
an heir from his wife, Catherine of Aragon. The report will discuss who the Puritans, Separatists
(Pilgrims/Brownists), and Baptists are and how they vary from each other. Also, how they will all
came together to attack the Church of England (Anglicans). This report will also explain the
reformed (Calvinists) theology and how the Arminian theology differs from it.
Henry VIII was a Roman Catholic who wanted a divorce but his Roman Catholic Church didn't
believe in divorce. They only way someone could re–marry is if they became widowed. As Henry
VIII was the king of England he permitted himself access to a divorce; the pope didn't agree with his
choice and he excluded him .
In the early fifteenth and sixteenth century the Separatists (Puritans) and Pilgrims escaped from
Europe and made the first the first states in the Unites States due to the Church of England's
religious beliefs. Europeans believed that if they didn't have the same religious beliefs then they
were punished . Both Puritans and Pilgrims became protestants who were followers of any Western
Christian churches that separated from the Roman Catholic Church. Separatists and Pilgrims
followed the principles of the Reformation that included Baptist, Presbyterian and Lutheran
churches . Separatists referred to themselves
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The And The Bible
Introduction
For centuries predestination has been a meticulously discussed subject which causes many divides
in opinion due to some verses in the Bible being potentially ambiguous or contradictory and it is
therefore necessary to look at this ancient text as a whole in order to get an accurate understanding.
Predestination is a significant topic as it brings into question the nature of the traditional Judeo–
Christian God who has long been seen as omniscient (possessing universal and complete
knowledge), omnibenevolent (infinitely good and all–loving), omnipotent (all–powerful) and
immanent (permanently interacting with the universe). For some, the idea of having a supreme god
and yet a sin–filled world is either impossible or simply means that this god is the 'father of all
evils'. Could it be that God is the alpha and the omega (the beginning and the end) but not the
intermediate because he lacks the power, knowledge and love to regulate this world which has been
spiralling out of control since the Fall of Man in Genesis 3? Another reason as to why it is
significant is that it will reveal to us whether we are accountable for our actions or whether God's
sovereignty takes precedence over our culpability. The examination can be fragmented into two
opposing perspectives, Calvinism and Arminianism, which both try to explain the predicament of
predestination in regards to seven key areas: sovereignty, man's depravity, election, Christ's
atonement, grace, man's will and

Arminianism Research Paper
While various doctrines can cause conflict between others with opposing views, it is a convenient
way to share one's beliefs concerning different topics within the Bible. For example, in regards to
the magnitude of sin, there are many doctrines that try to explain the effects and nature of sin within
man himself. By labeling one's belief, one can help give insight to what he or she believes what the
Bible says about that topic. One doctrine that gives great insight to the nature of sin itself, is
Arminianism. First mentioned by the Dutch theologian James Arminius, and then later modified by
John Wesley, the Arminian approach to explaining the origins and magnitude of sin is that all of
mankind has received a corrupted nature after Adam had sinned in the garden. This differs from
other views such as Pelagianism, which states that man is not born with either a sinful nature, or any
guilt from Adam's sinful act. Because of Adam's disobedience to God, man is now born without any
righteousness, and is unable to be fulfill God's commands without divine help. Arminianism also
different from other doctrines because it states that the inability to fulfill God's commands is both
physical and intellectual, but does not compromise man's free will. Because of what Jesus did on the
cross, every man has the option to accept the free gift of prevenient grace, and could then no longer
have to be bound by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This realization of how we are all the same is not only humbling, but also helps prevent me from
dehumanizing others when they sin. We as humans are so quick to point the finger when others do a
wrongful act, which only makes us hypocrites in doing so when we either have committed the same
act ourselves, or have done some other type that is no less displeasing to God. This doctrine is
humbling, and helps me not become a

Eternal Security: Can a Christian Lose His Salvation? Essay
Some view their Christian liberty as a license to sin. As Bible–believing Christians, we know this is
absolutely not the case! Indeed, we are saved by grace, and not through our good works. But what
happens when a Christian falls from the path, into his old ways? A Calvinist would say that a true
believer cannot lose his salvation, while an Arminian would say that one can lose his salvation
(Dunham 41). The purpose of this paper is to look at the issue of eternal security, and to determine
whether "once saved, always saved" does hold true, or whether a Christian can lose his salvation.
Eternal Security
The definition of eternal security, or perseverance of the saints, is defined in the Moody Handbook
of Theology as "The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his book Salvation, Charles Horne quotes G.C. Berkouwer as saying:
"...Peter's fall was miserable. He, the one who had confessed Christ at Caesarea Philippi, was the
very one who forsook Him in the darkest hour of His life. He made his contribution to the total
forsakenness of the Man of Sorrows. Truly, it was not Peter's faith, love, and faithfulness that
preserved him. His life was saved by the intercession of Christ... (Horne 100)."
Salvation is not earned by our own merit; it is a gift given to desperate sinners. According to
Calvinistic theology, it is not whether or not one continues doing good works that determines
salvation; the strength of the Father is that which guarantees this condition of safety (Strombeck 1).
This point has been a hotbed of controversy for many years, since it seems to say that one can accept
Christ's gift of salvation, but then going on living a life of deliberate and willful sin and debauchery.
This is not at all what eternal security is about! "Belief in Jesus Christ entails denying oneself both
gratification of sinful appetites and any pleasure, though not evil in itself, that steals affection for
Christ. One who believes in Jesus Christ picks up one's own cross, an instrument of death to sin, and
follows after Him (Schreiner 135)."
Loss–of–Rewards View
There are two theories found among those who adhere to the doctrine of

The Great Awakening By Jonathan Edwards And George...
Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield had an indirect impact on the American Revolution due
the Great Awakening. The Great Awakening was a revival of a person's personal spirituality sparked
by Whitefield and Edwards; which de–emphasized the church. The revolution preached similar
messages regarding criticism and tensions of authority. Without these two men, the American
Revolution would not have happened as early as it did, if it all.
George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards were both two extreme zealous preachers and very
different from each other but had a similar message. George Whitefield was an English Minster,
evangelist, and preacher. Whitefield's purpose was to encourage people to repent their sins and
transmute their sinful ways and become preserved to Christ. As for Jonathan Edwards he was a
Puritan, preacher and philosopher. Edwards' concept was to fixate on the experience in religion; he
wanted people to understand the distinction between what Edward called a 'merely notional
understanding ' of something and 'being in some way inclined ' with reverence. He wanted people to
understand the nature and experience of religion. Both Whitefield and Edwards were important
figures in Christianity; they could also be seen as entertainers of that time.
Called the "Son of Thunder", George Whitefield's released his powerful voice to spread his message.
He constructed messages which revolved around the concept that humankind could never know or
reach God because of original

John Wesley and George Whitefield View on the Doctrine of...
INTRODUCTION
John Wesley and George Whitefield were two very influential men in the great awakening. Though
the impact of both of these men was felt far and wide during the great awakening; their view on the
doctrine of election could not be more at odds. Justo L. Gonzalez in his book The Story of
Christianity spoke about the dynamic nature of Whitefield and Wesley relationship. He stated,
"Wesley and Whitefield worked together for some time, although slowly Wesley became the main
leader of the movement. Eventually, they parted because of theological differences. Both were
Calvinist in most matters; but, on the issue of predestination and free will, Wesley departed from
orthodox Calvinism, preferring the Arminian position". ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was the love and natural talent for speaking that would eventually shape his path. George would
later attend Oxford to obtain his undergraduate degree. It was at school that George was introduced
to John Wesley through his participation in the Holy Club. Mark Noll explained this time by saying,
"Whitefield had been an Oxford undergraduate of very modest means when he was recruited into
the Holy Club where John Wesley and his brother, the hymn writer Charles, were prominent". Noll
goes on to say that it was through the participation in the club that George was saved. After
Whitefield graduated his talent for preaching was almost immediately recognized. He was asked to
travel to many churches throughout England preaching the good news of Jesus Christ. Arnold
Dallimore explained that during this time that people would simply try to touch George's garments
as he passed them. Though Whitefield had celebrity type success in England he was called to
continue his preaching in America. George had a profound impact in England, however; his work in
America was absolutely remarkable. Whitefield often spoke to well over one thousand people.
Given the fact that he spoke to such a large number many of his sermons in America were preached
outdoors. Dallimore speaks of this type of preaching by saying, "Whitefield took to himself the
liberty anywhere opportunities afforded. If a church was allowed he used it, but if not, he stood on

Buckingham's Grievances
Another major issue during this period and one that was linked to this fear of new Councils was that
of Buckingham. Buckingham was the paramount grievance and focus of the 1626 session which
resulted in the declaration and Impeachment of Buckingham. This document highlights how much
the grievances of Buckingham were court grievances. The first grievance listed against Buckingham
is that he had 'for his own profit, procured and engrossed into his hands the said several offices and
the corruption of the Duke is a key aspect through this document. This highlights how the
grievances against Buckingham are levelled against both his corruption and domination of office.
Sharpe also notes the case example of Arundel whose opposition on Buckingham ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The final major political issue of this period is that of religion. At the start of this period, religion
was a concern rather than a serious grievance and was centred on the on the issue of Catholicism.
Charles marriage in 1625 to the French Henrietta Maria and his agreement to be more tolerant
towards Catholics led to reaction fear over the extent of this religious toleration. Another issue at
this time was also the rise of Arminianism. Richard Montagu's recently published Apello was a
religiously Arminian and inexplicably linked to Charles as it was published under the King's
warrant. Additionally, Charles prevention of proceeding against Montagu by appointing him to the
Royal Chaplaincy led to fears over Charles own religious leanings. Arminianism due to its different
beliefs on the issue of predestination and its more ceremonial nature was viewed as being crypto–
catholic. The importance of this issue to the Parliament is shown by the Commons protestation in
1625 in which it asserts that they needed 'His Majesty's late gracious answer touching religion' and
that after this they would 'in like sort to afford all necessary supply'. Sue to the fact that
Arminianism was a threat from within and that it claimed to be the Doctrine of the Church of

Lake 's Assertion Of Religious Conflict
Lake's assertion that religious conflict in early Stuart England was the result of a pursuit of
traditional conformity by the Puritans holds true to a large extent. In the earlier half of the 17th
Century, the Puritans have consistently sought for reforms to make changes to the English Church,
with an unfaltering insistence of removing any perceived popish practices to create church in the
model of a more traditional Calvinism. He should not, however, go as far as to proclaim that there
was no 'rise of Arminianism' as there was indeed an ostensible influx of Arminianism during the
reign of Charles I. Arminianism did burgeoned steadily, especially under the quasi–Catholic policies
of Charles I and innovations that William Laud brought to the Church. However, with or without the
antagonistic ideological differences of Arminianism and Calvinism, there was always the constant
seeking of reforms by the Puritans, to move as far away from Catholicism as possible. The
introduction of Arminianism merely 'created a politically assertive Puritanism '. The fear that
Arminian practices would force the English Church towards a more Catholic–liked system invoked
fear amongst the Puritans resulting in a 'call for more sweeping changes'. The Puritans wanted
change before any major form of Arminianism took shape and with the latter's increasing influence
from the 1620s, puritans simply became more aggressive in seeking reforms. The accession of
James I in 1603 saw the Millenary

Similarities Between Calvinism And Arminianism
The destiny of the unevangelized is a topic with varying viewpoints that sprout out of two distinctly
different theological positions; these positions are that of Calvinism and Arminianism. Calvinists
hold a viewpoint regarding salvation that entails the election of certain group of individuals that will
be saved. This viewpoint is based on the Biblical passages found in Romans 11:2 and 8:28–30.
These verses speak to a chosen few who Christ specifically died for and that are predestined to enter
Heaven. Those who fall under the Arminianism category have a differing viewpoint in regards to
salvation. Instead of a predetermined group of individual's going to Heaven, this viewpoint
acknowledges God's omniscient nature and postulates that He knows who will choose ... Show more
A person also receives salvation through the steps outlined in Romans 10:9, "if you confess with
your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will
be saved." While individual's from both Calvinist and Arminian backgrounds hold the restrictive
view to be the most accurate in regards to the destiny of the unevangelized, this viewpoint is most
commonly supported by the Calvinist viewpoint regarding the elect, "REA (Restrictive–access
exclusivism) is held mainly by strict Calvinists, but also by non–Calvinist evangelicals." The
Restrictive view, in regards to those who have never been evangelized to or have never encountered
the gospel, holds that those particular individuals cannot receive salvation. This is due to the
viewpoint that an individual must "respond to the preaching of the gospel in this life" in order to be

John Calvinism Research Paper
Calvinism is considered to be the system of a Christen belief in France, the Netherlands, and
Scotland. Calvinism is also to be the religious ideology that went and had inspired the massive
politician resistance. Calvinism was designed by no one other than John Calvin. Calvinism consists
of five points, which make up the TULIP. TULIP is stand for Total Depravity Unconditional
Election Limited Atonement Irresistible Grace Perseverance of the Saints. The way that his writings
influenced the European thought would have to be is idea of predestination. The writings also made
the people to believe that both men and woman had to be determined to live their life's externally as
they professed to believe internally and eternally. Some ways that Calvinism

The Differences Between Calvinism And Arminianism
Has God decided whether or not you will be saved and go to Heaven? Is there anything you can do
in determining your place in either Heaven or Hell? Calvinism and Arminianism are two differing
theological standpoints that have been and are being debated frequently. These stances give an
answer to the question of whether or not people are subject to predestination. Both sides hold that
they are correct and backed by biblical proofs. Upon having a first look towards both views it is
immediately clear and evident that it is rather difficult to discern which of the two have strong
biblical support. Calvinism and Arminianism are held by all sorts of Christians from all
denominations. To achieve a better understanding of each view it is important ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This means that without God granting us faith we cannot choose to have it and therefore not receive
a key to paradise. So Calvinism rose as a new way of viewing salvation in response towards the
Catholic Church 's twisted and deformed teachings to gain money from the common man. What
does Calvinism teach exactly? According to David N. Steele and Curtis Thomas in their article The
Five Points of CALVINISM – Defined, Defended, Documented Calvinism holds that "Salvation is
accomplished by the almighty power of the Triune God. The Father chose a people, the Son died for
them, the Holy Spirit makes Christ 's death effective by bringing the elect to faith and repentance,
thereby causing them to willingly obey the gospel. The entire process (election, redemption,
regeneration) is the work of God and is by grace alone. Thus God, not man, determines who will be
the recipients of the gift of salvation." Calvinism can be better understood when taking a look at the
five points of Calvinism commonly referred to as T.U.L.I.P, which stands for Total Depravity,
Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints
(Slick "The Five Points of Calvinism"). The first point, total depravity, states that man is completely
affected by sin. However, this does not mean that man is

How Did The First Great Awakening Influence The Role Of...
During the early eighteenth century between 1730 and 1750, a resurgence in religious fervor known
as the First Great Awakening developed throughout the thirteen British Colonies. As the European
Enlightenment ideas of reason and logic in all things began to grow in Europe and the colonies, the
First Great Awakening derived from an attempt to restore the predominance of emotion and spiritual
piety in religion. Likewise, throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the Second Great
Awakening again invigorated religious zeal in the United States in response to the growing
secularism in America and complacency of religious believers. The First Great Awakening's
prominent figures, Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield, discredited the socially stratified
religious ideology of established churches such as the Christ Church and popularized the religious
ideology of fervent personal connections with God and the principles of spiritual guilt and Calvinist
predestination, or the selective and predetermined salvation and damnation of people. From the First
Great Awakening also arose the decrease in traditional church parish worship and the appearance of
emotionally impassioned itinerant preachers in the thirteen colonies and the mass preaching to
emotional crowds outside. The Second Great Awakening eroded Calvinist predestination, and
instead religions such as Methodists and Baptists professed the equality of all before God and
salvation for all who repent for their sins and

Comparing Calvinism And Arminius Viewpoints And Touch On...
Throughout history people have questioned election. The question is whether people are predestined
to be called to heaven and can not reject the Holy Spirit's calling such as a John Calvin. Or do we
have the free will to accept or deny the Holy Spirit's calling into our lives such as James Arminius
believed. Or is it something else just as Karl Barth or Augustine believed in. But for the purpose of
this paper we will look at Calvinism and Arminius viewpoints and touch on the view points of other
theologians throughout history to come up with an accurate conclusion of which of the two main
theological ideas is most likely the case of election. Election has always been a sensitive subject
many in Christian circles. Most Christians lean ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the old and new testament he Understanding of election in terms of salvation was not clearly
stated but there are scriptures in the Old Testament that you can see where election was in place. The
Old Testament election mainly involved the nation of Israel. And when he chose the nation of Israel
it almost seemed in a way that God chose the nation because he could. In Genesis God chose Abram
later named Abraham to become a mighty nation from his seed and be a blessing to all nations
(Genesis 18). And through that seed of Abraham in Deuteronomy chose Israel nation even though
they where hard hearted often (Deut 9:6). But there are other examples outside the nation of Israel.
Most notably Cyrus, Cyrus was chosen to rebuild the temple. God even revealed Himself to Cyrus
but there is no evidence to suggest that Cyrus was in fact regenerated So it seems that the Old
Testament does not support the concept that personal salvation is a result of individual election. In
the New Testament there are verses on election and both sides to support their case. For example in
Romans 8 it seems like that predestination is conformed when it mentions that we as believers
would be predestined to be in Jesus image. In Ephesians 1 it states that we where predestined to be
adopted. But in John 3 it seems that everyone is called to God. And in Ephesians 2 God gives us the
gift of salvation. I think that what

The Great Awakening By Christine Leigh Heyrman
The Great Awakening
A restructuring of religious doctrine, beliefs, and social practices during the 17th and 18th centuries
in England, and in North America, infused with Calvinistic religious doctrine initiated the beginning
of The Great Awakening. Following this further, according to Christine Leigh Heyrman, The First
Great Awakening: Divining America," a New Age of faith rose to counter the currents of the Age of
Enlightenment. Ultimately reaffirming the view that being truly religious meant trusting the heart
rather than the head, prizing feeling more than thinking, and relying on biblical revelation rather
than human reason. After a while, several religious revivals sprung forth appeasing the colonists in
America desire for a deep and significant personal relationship with God. Thus, this dogma spread
to other denominations throughout the colonies in America (Heyrman)." As a result, The Great
Awakening spread throughout the middle colonies in America by notable revivalist preachers
instituting moderate Calvinistic doctrinal theology especially for the Presbyterians and the
Congregationalists, and opened the door to unprecedented world societal changes.
Whether answering a call from God or by invitation, Theodorus Jacobus Frelinghuysen came to
America to minister to the Dutch population. Frelinghuysen had acquired many of the theological
leanings of a confessional pietist, among which was a view of conversion. Although never officially
systematized, confessional pietists

Eternal Security
ETERNAL SECURITY (ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED) DR. LEMONS SYSTEMATIC
THEOLOGY RELI 4350 01 The doctrine of eternal security or (once saved always saved)has been
at the center of the discussion of salvation. While we will look at the theological beliefs and frame
works of someof our church fathers, some of our contemporary Theologians and Pastors, we will
primarily focus on key biblical passages that seem to speak on both sides of the issue. I am a born–
again believer who have been saved for 21 years, ministering for 19 years, and now is the Pastor of
a local Baptist Church. I chose this topic because I wrestled with this question myself when I was
first saved. However I am now convinced that I could never lose what was eternally given to ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ephesians 2:8–9, tells us that "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not your selves: it is
the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast". The scripture even tells us that the faith it
takes to believe comes from God, so there is no way on our part we can stop believing. As I read
both views I see wherethere cannot be a reconciliation of the two, except for unconditional election
and free will based on the notion of walking away or stop believing. However, I do see howthere
can be a bridge to connect the two. John Wesley, have this view of "Prevenient Grace or Preparing
Grace". The word prevenientmeans preceding, implying the grace God sends before conversion.
Although Arminianist teach that this grace can be rejected, and that man is not totally depraved but
can sense a spark of prevenientgrace to draw a person to God through Jesus Christ. I believe this is
the link that can correspond to unconditional election in a conditional way. We will now look at
some church teaching on Easy believism: It is the coming to Christ without any commitment, mental
assent to Christ, praying a quick prayer, and receiving a quick decision. John MacArthur writes "The
gospel Jesus proclaimed was a call to discipleship, a call to follow Him in submissive obedience, not
just a plea to make a

John Owen 's Holy Spirit
JOHN OWEN'S VINDICATION OF HOLY SPIRIT'S DEITY AND ITS BENEFITS FOR
BELIEVERS
Against the Socinians, John Owen vindicated the deity of the Holy Spirit, as well as his benefits for
believers, within a Christological context. The Socinians were not the only opponents Owen dealt
with, but they were notorious for their anti–Trinitarian views. On Owen's theological engagement,
Crawford Gribben assessed the Socinian threat as a gift to Owen for drawing "attention to the
ambiguity of the boundaries of orthodoxy permitted by the state," and that Owen "took advantage of
the moral panic." While it is true that Owen produced theological works in response to Socinianism,
Owen regarded Socinianism as a major threat. The same applies to other ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Before examining the doctrines of Socinian and those of Owen, however, it is important to consider
the historical context of these theological controversies.
Historical Context
John Owen's Context
John Owen (1616–1683) was born in Stadhampton, near Oxford, to Henry Owen, a man of Puritan
sympathies. After finishing local grammar school, Owen matriculated at Queen's College, Oxford,
in 1631. Owen achieved his Bachelor of Arts in 1632. He finished his Master of Arts studies in 1635
and ordained deacon. Then Owen engaged in a 7–year course for a Bachelor of Divinity. In 1642,
Owen published A Display of Arminianism, the first among many of his works. Owen soon received
much attention and was invited to preach before Parliament.
In 1649, after the execution of Charles, Owen again preached to parliament. Here, Oliver Cromwell
was present and chose Owen as his chaplain. Owen was then appointed Dean of Christ Church,
Oxford, in 1651. In the following year, Owen became vice–chancellor and served until 1657. As a
preacher who joined Cromwell's revolution, Owen's appointment was a symbolic victory over
monarchy. In other words, the new appointments to key university positions were symbolic of the
wider ambitions of the Cromwellian administration.
As the "Oxford Reformer," as Gribben put it, Owen promoted Calvinistic piety that transcended the
political and cultural division of the university. In 1651, for example, Owen outlined the qualities of
Calvinistic piety when he

John Wesley and the Methodist Church- Analysis of...
I have been a firm believer that if one does not understand where you come from you can have little
understanding of where your heading. The first thirty–two pages of the book on "Methodism and the
Christian Heritage in England" gave a background as to Wesley's foundation that so many authors
overlook. The first page summed it up best in: "The long course of English ecclesiastical history met
the force of a new concern for renewal, both individual and institutional. A long tradition of
propositional certainty of faith met the power of a personal experience of faith. An institution built
by and for the establishment met a concern for the souls and bodies of the disenfranchised" (p.1,
Heitzenrater). This explained the transformation of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
15, Heitzenrater). He was stripped of his ability to preach and in his mid–twenties would "spend the
remaining years of his life in a variety of pulpits and prisons" (p. 15, Heitzenrater). The Act of
Toleration of 1689 was enacted to accommodate the nonconformists to the Thirty–Nine Articles to
legally exist "under certain prescribed conditions: (1) meeting houses must be registered with the
government; (2) dissenting preachers must be licensed; (3) meetings for worship must be held in the
registered meeting houses, not in private homes; (4) Roman Catholic or Unitarian groups were not
to be included under these provision. Many privileges of English citizenship thereby became
dependent upon conformity to the official doctrines of the Church–subscription to the Articles was
required of all who matriculated at the universities, of all who held public office, of all who held
commissions in the armed forces, and of all who wished to vote in elections (p. 17, Heitzenrater).
The formation of small groups knows as collegia pietatis in Spencer's plan and the English version,
the religious societies. How these groups formed, and purpose: "their approach was aimed more
toward quality than quantity and was grounded more in the process of nurture than conversion" (p.
22, Heitzenrater). "The stated purpose of the societies was to promote "real holiness of heart and
life." The meetings were designed primarily to offer mutual encouragement in the development of
devotional piety

Predestination And Its Impact On The Theological Landscape
Predestination Any study on predestination as it pertains to salvation would be incomplete without
the mention of John Calvin. Calvin was born in 1509 and died in 1564. He is well known for his
book titled Institutes of the Christian Religion, in which he explained his views on the church and
other subjects like the sacraments, justification, Christian liberty and the sovereignty of God.
Norman Geisler of the Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics described him as, "a pioneer
Protestant exegete of the Bible." Nevertheless, his theories on predestination, foreordination, and
election have had a tremendous influence on the study of theology and helped to shape the
theological landscape during his time as well as the current theological landscape. His influence is
so predominate regarding the predestination doctrine that it is often also referred to as Calvinism.
Some scholars would even point to the doctrine's origins as being developed by Calvin. Calvinism's
main focus is on God's sovereignty, but a portion of Calvinism directly addresses predestination,
election, and foreordination. To get a better understanding of the Calvinists interpretation of
predestination, as well as what is commonly the general consensus for those espousing the
predestination doctrine, one need go no farther than John Calvin himself,
We call predestination God's eternal decree, by which he compacted with himself what he willed to
become of each man. For all are not created in equal condition,

Compare And Contrast Calvinism And Arminianism
Arminianism and Calvinism both have five points. The first point in Arminianism is Freewill or
Human Ability. God enables all sinners to repent and believe, but at the same time, He does not
interfere with man's freedom. Calvinism's first point is Total Inability or Total Depravation. This
takes regeneration by which the Spirit makes the sinner alive and gives us a new nature. The second
point of Arminianism is Conditional Election, in which God chooses certain individuals to be saved
before the foundation of the world was based upon His foreseeing that they would respond to His
call. This is in contrast to Calvinism's Unconditional Election, in which God's choice of certain
individuals into salvation before the foundation of the world rested on His will. ... Show more
In this point, Christ's redeeming work made it possible for everyone to be saved but did not actually
secure the salvation for them. Calvinism, on the other hand, believes that Christ's redeeming work
was intended to save the elect only and actually secured salvation for them. The Spirit calling
inwardly all those who are called outwardly by the gospel invitation illustrates Arminianism's fourth
point, The Holy Spirit Can Be Effectually Resisted. The Holy Spirit extending to the elect a special
inward call that inevitable brings those to salvation is Calvinism's fourth point, The Efficacious Call
of the Spirit or Irresistable Grace. The last point of Arminianism is Falling From Grace. According
to this point, those who believe and are truly saved can lose their salvation by failing to keep up
their faith. Calvinism's last point, Perseverance of the Faith, says that all who are chosen by God,
redeemed by Christ, and given faith by the Spirit are eternally saved. In summary, the Arminianism
theological system says that salvation is accomplished through the combined efforts of God and man
while the Calvinism system believes that salvation is accomplished through the power of God.
(Steele,

Essay on The Providence Debate
The Providence Debate Barbara J. Best Theology 350 July 3, 2013 When one defines God's
providence it is referring to the way God governs the world. Does God really sit on His throne and
dictate or rule the world? It is not surprising that there is some disagreement in the evangelical
world concerning the control of God, His dealing with salvation especially as affected by Jesus and
the freewill of mankind. Some theologians think that the three are in contradictory of each other. Are
they really in conflict with each other's or can all three exist in full scriptural belief without doing
any injustice to the other two? When one talks about the sovereignty of God the actual word is not
used in the bible but He is there ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And it is in your hand to make great and to give strength to all. Romans 9:22–23 What if God,
willing to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much long–suffering the
vessels of wrath fitted to destruction; and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the
vessels of mercy which He had before prepared to glory This is truly a hot topic because it deals
with one of the most important facet of the Believer walk and that is which side of the fence are you
on when it comes to your salvation. Are you satisfied knowing that God made the choice for you or
that you made the choice for yourself to accept His son Jesus? John Calvin was born in (1509–1564)
he was a leader in the Reformation. He was a highly respected as a theologian. John Calvin wrote a
book entitled the Institutes of the Christian Religion in 1535. This book was written primary for the
Protestant welfares and it had an astounding effect on many. "It proved to be the most influential
work of the Protestant Reformation. Protestants in different countries saw Calvin as a pillar of
strength to their cause, a theologian of the highest rank, while Romanists feared his pen as one of
their most formidable foes." John Calvin was adamant about his belief. He is called the systematical
theologian who had a remarkable gift of interrupting biblical doctrine and making it understandable
and appealing. He was definitely a man who relied solely on the scripture

Arminianism Vs Pelagianism
Dave Hunt says that usually Calvinist call Pelagians or Semi–Pelagian to those Christians that reject
their doctrine, but it is important to know the differences between Arminianism and Pelagianism to
avoid being confused.
In conclusion, we can say that Pelagianism rejects the belief and the doctrine of the Original Sin and
claim that humans have not been corrupted, so people are capable of deciding to do good and avoid
sin without the help of God. In summary, humans are capable of merit salvation on their own
without God's grace. Pelagius believed that the only thing that can affect us to obey God would be
the human ignorance of God's will.
Salvation in Pelagianism came through obedience. People are justified in on the basis of merits as

Comparing Calvinism And Arminianism And Two Systems Of...
There is no debate in the Christian community that over 2000 years ago, Jesus Christ died on the
cross. However, the question raised by many is just "who" did he die for? Whose sins did he atone?
Did he die for all of us or only the elect? Many Christians have openly debated about just how one is
saved for centuries, but not everyone sees eye–to–eye on the matter. Both Calvinism and
Arminianism, two systems of theology, "attempt to explain the relationship between God's
sovereignty and man's responsibility in the matter of salvation" (Calvinism vs. Arminianism). Just
what is Calvinism and Arminianism? Which group of thoughts is right? Where did they come from?
Before being able to answer that question, one must understand each ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He was born in Oudewater, Holland in 1560, the same year "John Calvin was busy establishing the
Genevan Academy to propagate his ideas of predestination" (Jacob Arminius, Christian History). In
1575 Arminius started attending the University of Leyden. While there, the municipal authorities of
Amsterdam agreed to pay all of Arminius's academic expenses in return for his pledge to spend the
remainder of his life serving the Amsterdam church (Christian History Institute). A year after he
began his public ministry in 1588, the ecclesiastical senate of Amsterdam asked Arminius to respond
to the teachings of Dutch poet, translator, playwright, and moralist Dirk Coornhert.
Coornhert rejected much of Calvin's doctrine of predestination, justification, and punishment of
heretics by death (Christian History Institute). "Weighing the arguments, Arminius thought
Coornhert right, but would not commit himself until he had made a diligent study of the scriptures,
the early church fathers, and later divines" (Christian History Institute). Arminius later became
firmly against Calvinism after thoroughly studying the Epistle to the Romans. He found that "it is an
eternal and gracious decree of God in Christ, by which he determines to justify and adopt believers,
and to endow them with eternal life but to condemn unbelievers, and impenitent persons" (Galli 42).
A year after Arminius's death in 1609, Arminius's followers came to be known as the

Differences Between Calvinism And Arminianism
The purpose of this paper is to compare two theological positions, namely Calvinism and
Arminianism. These are two positions on either side of the extreme concerning free will and
predestination. There are those who believe that we have the free will to love and obey God or deny
God, and there are those who believe that God, in his sovereignty, has predetermined who will be
saved or who will not be saved and neither group is willing to budge. Both sides claim to have the
support of Scripture, and both have specific verses that are twisted and manipulated to show support
and reasoning. The problem is that both sides appear, on some levels at least, to be right. The
question that can be answered from a comparison of these two views is this: What are the basic
differences between Calvinism and Arminianism, as well as, their relation to theology, biblical
evidence and worldviews? This research paper covers the five key points or articles of Calvinism
and Arminianism, as well as, the history, view of God and biblical evidence or support for each
position.
History
The history of Calvinism and Arminianism dates back to the 16th century, where a man named John
Calvin was born in 1509. John Calvin was a son of a lawyer and born in Noyon, France where he
developed a love for theology and literature. In 1523 he went to the University of Paris where he
studied theology, yet in 1528 he went to Orleans and a year later Bourges to study law. With Calvin's
father being a lawyer, he was

Arminianism And John Calvin Similarities
At the turn of the 17 th century there was a major theological movement involving the Calvinistic
Systematic Theology (known as Calvinism) and Arminian Systematic Theology (known as
Arminianism). While they are both historically related, having been born from the Protestant
Reformation, they are also conflicting with each other. Calvinism– In 1536 John Calvin published
his work The Institutes of the Christian Religion in which he covered several theological topics.
Such teachings attracted the church of Geneva leading to the reformation of the church to an
apostolic model (following the biblical model Jesus had established with his apostles) and the
establishment of several schools including the University of Geneva. One of the things ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice
in hope of the glory of God.͟ Romans 5:1–2 While both systems of theology can be supported by
scripture there is one that I lean towards the most. I believe Calvinism to be the most biblically
sound. However, both of these are teachings of man and not Jesus. I want to learn from Him and so
I'll go straight to the Bible and let God take it from there. I also believe that once God has called you
it is then that you are able to exercise your God given free will to accept His call, put it on hold, or
ignore His call completely. One of the scriptures that I base this on is Deuteronomy 30:19–20: ͞This
day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and
death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live and that you
may love the Lord your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to

Paul 's Epistles : An Theologian And Church History Scholar
People studying Paul 's epistles know that to understand them, they must first put them in their
proper context. We like to state that Paul's epistles were "occasional" writings. This simply means,
they were occasioned by their context. This can relate to the current situation that is also important
for understanding the perspective that Olson portrays in his book. Olson is an Arminian theologian
and church history scholar who is aware of the climate of evangelicalism. Olson has also become
aware of Calvinists who would like to see him removed from his position as professor and
theologian based on the fact that he is not a Calvinist. He identiﬁes these Calvinists as those who
have been called the, "young, restless, and Reformed." And Olson ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It seems as though Olson finds it difficult to believe, when he encounters this form of Calvinism, "to
see the difference between God and the devil" (23).
Olson is very aware that some Calvinists accuse non–Calvinists of rejecting their theology because
of "a latent humanistic love for free will" (23). But it is not humanism that leads Olson and other
non–Calvinist theologians to embrace free will, he does so because: (1) "it is necessary to preserve
human responsibility for sin and evil" and (2) "it is necessary to preserve God from being
responsible for sin and evil."
Olson operates with the criteria of theological truth defined by Wesley and this statement is "the
primary source and norm" (24). So Olson will argue in this book that high Calvinism: (1) "is not the
only or the best way of interpreting Scripture," (2) "stands in tension with the ancient faith of the
Christian church and much of the heritage of evangelical faith," and (3) "falls into contradictions"
(24–25).
If one has such a firm belief in a theology, then one should be able to teach it "standing in front of
the gates of Auschwitz" (25); however, Olson "could not stand at those gates and preach a version of
God's sovereignty that makes the extermination of six million Jews, including many children, a part
of the will and plan of God such that God foreordained and rendered it certain" (25).
The issue of

Arminianism and Calvinism
Everyday people argue who is and isn't right, but in all honesty whose to know? A big topic of
argument is religion. Now one would think that in something so pure it would be hard to twist things
but mankind has found it rather easy. Especially in The Bible, there are so many questions that are
unanswered. God did not do this on accident but there has been a lot for man to make the decisions.
Two topics that are frequently debated are Arminianism and Calvinism. As it has already been stated
no one can have a 100% correct answer to each topics 5 main points but that doesn't mean man
should just avoid them, people should dig deeper and discover for themselves what is right in their
hearts. Calvinism has five main topics (as well as Arminianism). Calvinism uses T.U.L.I.P; total
depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, and perseverance of the saints. To speak on
just one of these topics is difficult due to the fact that they all relate with each other. Perseverance of
the saints is also known as once saved always saved. It states that once man has been elected by God
through unconditional election and then gets saved by the drawing of irritable grace that man is now
saved and has salvation forever. If a man is to fall away from God it was if he was never saved to
begin with. Think of a friend, you might do something that isn't agreeable by said friend's standards
and that friend might not talk to you for a while but that doesn't mean that you are not friends

Why Do Arminians Believe In Conditional Election
Arminians believe in Conditional Election, which is similar to Unconditional Election in that God
chose certain individuals unto salvation before the foundation of the world, but it was based upon
his foreseeing that they would respond to his call (thehighway). God's election was determined upon
man's choices. He predestined "those whom he knew would, of their own free will, choose Christ"
(thehighway). The choice we make whether to believe has already been calculated into the equation.
God, being an omniscient being, simply looks ahead at the choice we will make and elects those
who would choose him freely. All he calls us to do is to respond the grace that he has given us "by
exercising our God–restored human freedom as a condition of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
All those who have been chosen by God (the saints) who are given faith by the Holy Spirit are
eternally saved. By the power of God, the elected are kept in faith and thus persevere to the end
(thehighway). "Since God has decreed the elect, and they cannot resist grace, they are
unconditionally and eternally secure in that election" (crivoice). God has brought about the work of
sanctification in his elect. This process will continue until it reaches its fulfillment in eternal life
(Phil. 1:6) (reformed). In John 6:39, Christ promises the elect that he will never lose them. He
promises them that they will be glorified "at the last day." Ultimately, Calvinist believe that Christ
will fulfill the will of the Father in saving the elect as promised to us in the scriptures

Theological Debate in the Bible
Few subjects in the Bible have been subjected to as much theological debate as the issue of God's
sovereignty and human responsibility. Theologians on both sides of the issue have attempted to
answer the age old question of whether God chooses who will be "saved" or if the responsibility
falls to man to determine the outcome of their eternal soul. As found in the theories of John Calvin
and Joseph Arminius, each theologian attempted to prove their viewpoint on predestination, free–
will, and exactly who in humanity will go to an eternal paradise. In this paper, the evidence will be
presented from both sides of the debate leaving the reader to draw their own conclusions.
The foundation of the debate originates from the Biblical passages found in the book of Romans,
chapters nine through eleven. However, for the purposes of this paper, the focus will be primarily on
Romans chapter nine. In this section of his epistle, the Apostle Paul wrote of his deep concern for
Israel, the seven privileges God gave to Israel, the difference between Jews who naturally descended
from Abraham and Jews who are his spiritual seed, the fact that God's mercy is controlled by his
sovereign will, that the Old Testament prophets predicted the spiritual blindness of Israel, and God's
mercy being extended to the Gentiles. (King James Version Bible, Romans 9:1–33)
Professor Thomas Schreiner stated that, "Paul's words about predestination in these chapters have
also precipitated a great deal of

The Nature Of God's Foreknowledge
Foreknowledge, in the Christian sense, has been sharply debated for centuries. Though it directly
means God's prior and perfect knowledge of people and events regardless of time, it is
fundamentally tied to the understanding of the elect and the competing arguments of Calvinism and
Arminianism. To some, it may seem like the nature of God's foreknowledge is high, impractical
theology, but it deeply affects one's understanding of God, which in turn affects one's response to
God. A proper understanding of God's foreknowledge and the issues tied to it will cause one to
scrutinize, and possibly shift, the basis of their faith. Though knowledge is a communicable attribute
of God, foreknowledge is the segment of it reserved for God alone, making it incommunicable.
Surprisingly, it is not directly mentioned in the Old Testament, however the idea is clearly present in
places such as Isaiah 46:10 and Daniel 2:28 (blueletterbible.com). The New Testament authors,
particularly Paul, Peter, and Luke, were more concerned with the Christian application of this
attribute. Paul, in the epistle to the Romans, brings it up in Romans 8:29, "For those whom he
foreknew he also predestined to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Later, in Romans 11:2, Paul uses the same word, but the context makes this particular reference
irrelevant to a discussion about the attribute as a whole.) In Acts 2:22–23 Luke

Write An Essay On James Arminius
Jacobus "James" Arminius was born on October 10, 1560. He lived most of his early childhood in
Oudewater, Utrecht, which is a province of the Netherlands. After his parents were killed at a very
young age, he was adopted by a pastor named Theodorus Aemilius, who sent him to study theology
at the University of Leiden. James Arminius is notable for teaching theology at the University of
Leiden and writing multiple theology based books. He is most famous for Arminianism, which are
his teachings and theological beliefs. Although he is commonly known for his disagreements with
John Calvin, the two theologians agree on many biblical doctrines.
In his early life, James Arminius fully rejected the Pelagianism viewpoint, specifically on the fall of
Adam. Pelagianism states that the fall of Adam virtually had no affect on humanity. Furthermore, it
views humanity as morally good and acceptable. In response to this, Arminius says, "In this state,
the Free Will of man towards the True Good is not only wounded, maimed, infirm, bent, and
weakened [attenuatem]; but it is also imprisoned [captivatum], destroyed, and lost. And its powers
are not only debilitated and useless unless they be assisted by grace, but it has no powers whatever
except such as are excited by Divine grace...." With this viewpoint, James ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
James Arminius himself came from a background of Calvinistic viewpoints and embraced many of
them. The problem is not John Calvin or James Arminius, but we as imperfect humans. While
defending one side, we tend to use straw men and misrepresent the other side of the argument. What
we must understand is that both men loved the Lord and wanted to further their understanding of
God. Although they may disagree on some issues pertaining to God's word, me must recognize that
both men were imperfect

Baptist Churches Essay
Baptist Churches Calvary Baptist Church, that's the name of the church I recently attended, and
although it was a lot different from my own catholic faith, I enjoyed it very much. The Pastor,
Sergio Reyes, started out the service with an opening prayer which led us into a hymn about
America and how wonderful our country is. Most of the songs we sang were about America,
considering the fact that Independence Day was right around the corner. After a few songs and a few
prayers Pastor Reyes got up to deliver his sermon, or message as he liked to put it. The message was
one that hit me kind of hard, he was telling us how the majority of Americans don't like to hear the
truth, mainly because the truth hurts. He was also saying how we, as ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Because of their belief in a general atonement these believers were know as General Baptists. A
second group of Baptists began during the 1630s they were known as the Jacob–Lathrop–Jessey
church, named for its first three pastors: Henry Jacob (1563–1624), John Lathrop (1653), and Henry
Jessey (1601–1663). They were known as particular Baptists because of their belief that Christ died
for a particular group of people "the elect" chosen out of gods mercy before the foundation of the
world. They also believed that all people were born in total depravity worthy only of complete
damnation by a just and righteous God. Yet God, in mercy, had "elected" some individuals to
salvation unconditionally, a result of Gods sovereign choice, not because of any merit in the
individual believer. All the elect would be saved through Gods irresistible grace and would
persevere in Christian discipleship until the end. Therefore Christ death on the cross was "particular"
to the elect and did not apply to the entire human race. Thus by the 1640s there were two
distinguishable and diverse groups of Baptists in England. Each using a common set of practices but
presenting totally different theological ideals. By the 1650s another group of Baptists had appeared
in England. These Baptists were known as Seventh Day Baptists because they insisted that Saturday
was the divinely

Religious Doctrine, Beliefs, And Social Practices
A restructuring of religious doctrine, beliefs, and social practices during the 17th and 18th centuries
in England, and in North America, infused with Calvinistic religious doctrine initiated the beginning
of The Great Awakening. Following this further, according to Christine Leigh Heyrman, The First
Great Awakening: Divining America," a New Age of faith rose to counter the currents of the Age of
Enlightenment. Ultimately reaffirming the view that being truly religious meant trusting the heart
rather than the head, prizing feeling more than thinking, and relying on biblical revelation rather
than human reason. After a while, several religious revivals sprung forth appeasing the colonists in
America desire for a deep and significant personal relationship with God. Thus, this dogma spread
to other denominations throughout the colonies in America (Heyrman)." As a result, The Great
Awakening spread throughout the middle colonies in America by notable revivalist preachers
instituting moderate Calvinistic doctrinal theology especially for the Presbyterians and the
Congregationalists, and opened the door to unprecedented world societal changes. Whether
answering a call from God or by invitation, Theodorus Jacobus Frelinghuysen came to America to
minister to the Dutch population. Frelinghuysen had acquired many of the theological leanings of a
confessional pietist, among which was a view of conversion. Although never officially systematized,
confessional pietists in the German

The Theory Of Free Will
Free Will Jacob Arminius was born in 1560 and died in 1690. Although Arminius originally began
his learned career as a follower of Calvin's teachings, his interpretation of scripture eventually
brought him in direct contrast to Calvin's. While Arminius is not credited with developing the
doctrine of free will, his name has become synonymous with it. Likewise, the movement he inspired
became synonymous with "anti–Calvinism." Arminianism maintains that the Bible does in fact
communicate the message of predestination. However, Arminianism conveys that God by way of
His foreknowledge was able to look into the future and observe who would choose Him–God then
predestined them. Moreover, Jesus gave Himself a ransom for all, literally. As a ... Show more
The major sticking point with this theory is that free will allows mankind to make a choice– either
accept the gift of salvation or reject it.
As mentioned before, there is agreement between the two camps of thought regarding predestination
and election being taught in the Bible. Clearly, where the difference lies is in the interpretation.
Those backing the free will doctrine believe that God, by way of foreknowledge knows who will
and will not be saved. However, He does not interfere with free will and does not predestine the
outcome. Instead, the predestined or elect are those that He knows ahead of time will make the
choice to accept the gift of salvation. In order for one to accept the gift of salvation there are certain
conditions set forth by God in Scripture that one must meet. For example, Luke states,
While God has overlooked the times of human ignorance, now he commands all people everywhere
to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will have the world judged in righteousness by a
man whom he has appointed, and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.
(Acts 17:30–31)
One of the conditions set forth by God in Scripture is that people must repent. The two camps of
thought are also at odds regarding whom benefits from the sacrifice of Christ. Universal Atonement
implies that Christ gave himself a ransom for all. The Apostle Paul says as much in 1Timothy,
This is right and is

Teaching Techniques in Religion by Robert Baird
In the essay "Religion," Robert Baird argues against teaching techniques of secular university
religion courses. Baird's repeated use of phrases like "humanistic," "human culture" and
"understanding of man" in the paragraphs following thesection titled "The Secular Study of
Religion" all accurately describes the state of secular university religion courses. The first point
Baird uses to argue against the methods of teaching, is the humanistic basis of the courses. Braid
also argues that secular religious courses have no specific line of attack. The study of religion does
not possess a distinct methodology. It utilizes the methodologies of history, literary criticism,
philosophy, sociology, or phenomenology when they seem appropriate, avoiding reductionism only
to various degrees.
This leads to the last argument Baird makes against teaching techniques of secular university
religion courses. Baird argues strongly against the secular university's strong reliance on history as a
method of teaching religion. All of the arguments Baird used to support his dislike of teaching
techniques used by secular universities in religion courses; are very accurate and are very well
supported in his essay. For the reminder of the essay, Baird addresses the position Christians need to
take when confronted with the academic study of religion. First he addresses the historical aspect of
teaching the Christian will encounter. When Baird tackles this aspect of

Old Lights Follow Arminianism
The people who perceived the movement as disingenuous and found many errors of the Awakening,
Old Lights denounced the fervor and emotional experiences; they argued that man was naturally a
rational being. Old lights rejected the revivalist belief of salvation through faith and an
understanding of "spiritual knowledge," a knowledge that comes from self–examination and what
Jonathan Edwards called a "sense of the heart." Old Lights believed that works can justify their faith
and said that men could achieve salvation through time, exercise, observation, and instruction.
Although they did not focus on predestination and justification through faith, the Old Lights did not
follow Arminianism, a group centered on justification through works, which

The Essence Of The Debate
The Essence of the Debate
Divine Election according to Calvin
One of the most valuable key sources of information on the subject of divine election is John
Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion. He began weaving doctrinal revelation and explanation
together in 1536 and finished the text in 1559. The initial composed manuscript presented
comprehensive perspectives aligning with the four points of the Apostle's creed. As time passed,
Calvin decided to instruct readers in the rudiments of Christianity and offer a clear confession by
which the French king could judge Reformation's supposed heresy. The twenty first chapter of the
third book of this work offered his understanding on the subject of divine election.
The first line of this section explains "the covenant of life is not preached to all, and among those to
whom it is preached, does not always meet with the same reception". God has chosen, according to
his mere pleasure, to spontaneously offer salvation to some and destruction to others. Although
much scriptural evidence exists supporting this understanding, this revelation remains a mystery.
Paul's declaration in the Book of Romans suggests divine election "cannot be known unless God,
throwing works entirely out of view, elect those whom he has predestined". Hence, individuals need
to remember that this subject of predestination is hidden in the recesses of divine wisdom. All are
not born on the same terms; some are destined for eternal life and others

A Brief Look At The Historical View Of Conditional Election
A brief look at the historical view of conditional election that is briefly stated with Scriptures that is
used today. Giving evidence, that conditional is better than unconditional as in the Five Points of
Calvinism. Though the Bible obviously demonstrates that God selects individuals to redemption,
there are two differences as to the foundation of election. Conditional election is the idea that God
choose individuals for redemption centered on His omniscience of who want to place their belief in
Jesus. The free will of man plays into the scope of eternity. Historical View
Origen was one of the original to believe that predestination and will of man plays an important role
in the doctrine of election. The Scripture he uses is 2 Timothy 2:20–21 to where men can be saved.
John Chrysostom endorsed the thought on how salvation is performed. Semi–Pelagians also
opposed unconditional because of human freedom and preaching would be pointless. The Catholics
believe the part of free choice and being in the grace of God. James Arminius disagreed with
Calvinist on a few issues like atonement and will of man. He formulated major proclamations of the
process of salvation. James' articles were dismissed at Synod of Dort for being against the Scriptures
and where the articles from Calvin were accepted for the churches to teach. John Wesley was
strongly against unconditional and Calvinism that he gave reasons why the theory

The 1915 Genocide: A Forgotten Horror
Katie Haggerty
Period 6
November 14
The 1915 Genocide, A Forgotten Horror Fearful. Controlled. Hated. It's reasonable to imagine that's
the way an Armenian would feel in 1915. Although, a different word describes the event that caused
them to feel that way. That word is 'unrecognized'. The 1915 holocaust was a major historical event
that ended with 1.5 million people dead. It's an occurrence that not many people know even took
place. The Armenian Genocide was a horrible event that deserves more recognition. To begin, it's
important to understand that Armenians and Arminianists aren't the same (Arminianism–Wikipedia).
Arminianism is a religion that was started by a Dutch theologist by the name of Jacobus Arminius,
and although many ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most people don't know the differences between Armenians and Arminianists. Some people didn't
know the genocide took place much less the terrifying things that occurred during it. Some people
didn't even know that Arminianism was a religion, considering they might practice it without
knowing it. Everybody who knows of the holocaust should know about the Armenian

The Theological Definition Of Providence
There are many subjects in Christendom that are heavily debated. One in particular, is the
providence debate. The theological definition of providence is, "God's governing of the universe.
"God's support, care, and supervision of all creation, from its beginning to all eternity. The terms
comes from Latin providentia, which in turn derives from the verb provideo, "to foresee," but far
more is meant than foresight or foreknowledge." Some evangelicals hold that God's providence is
meticulous: He governs each and every detail. Others hold that it is more general: He controls the
"big picture", but gives humans freedom to make their own choices." There are many scriptures in
the Bible to back up God's providence in the world. However, the word providence is not actually
written in the Bible, but it represents a biblical doctrine. Not only that, "there is no Hebrew
equivalent for "providence," used only of human foresight." Many other issues have to be
considered when speaking on the providence of God. The doctrine of salvation, and the doctrine of
God are theological issues that has to be incorporated in this debate. Will an omniscience,
omnipresent, and omnipotent God create the universe and don't have control over it? According to
the book of Genesis God created everything in six days, and rested on the seventh. Would God
create all of creations, and not care about it? "God's works of providence are his most holy, wise and
powerful preserving and governing

How Did Henry Viii Influence The Colonies

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Beth Johnson

More from Beth Johnson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Did Henry Viii Influence The Colonies