Downloaded 10 times
Uploaded byBeth Beck
NASA's 2014 International Space Apps Challenge: Collaboration Process
The 2014 International Space Apps Challenge saw participation from 46 countries and 735 virtual participants, culminating in 76 hours of collaborative problem-solving on NASA data challenges. It highlighted the importance of diverse thinking, motivation, and effective collaboration while acknowledging the complexities and tensions inherent in team dynamics. The event produced a range of innovative projects, showcasing creativity in tackling space-related issues.
More Related Content
Similar to NASA's 2014 International Space Apps Challenge: Collaboration Process
NASA's 2014 International Space Apps Challenge: Collaboration Process
- 1. 2014 International SpaceApps Challenge Beth Beck, NASA Open Innovation Program Manager
- 2. 2014 International SpaceApps Challenge BethBeck,NASA
- 3. 46 countriesparticipated 735 virtual participants 69 virtual team projects Space Apps 2014 kicked off Thursday night in Doha, Qatar at midnight and ended in Seattle, Washington at 6 p.m. Pacific time —76 hours of around-the-world hacking on NASA data challenges. Volunteer Engagement Around the Planet 2014 Space Apps Challenge Overview BethBeck,NASA
- 4. Earth Watch: Whereon Earth (44 projects) Cool It (21) Robotics: Exomars Rover is My Robot (42) Asteroids: Asteroid Prospector (38) Space Tech: Space Wearables (25) Alert-Alert (24) Space Flight: Growing Food for A Martian Table (22) SpaceT (20) Most Popular Challenges 2014 Space Apps Challenge Overview BethBeck,NASA
- 5. Global Winners 2014 SpaceApps Challenge Overview BethBeck,NASA
- 6. 2014 Space AppsChallenge Overview Global Winners BethBeck,NASA
- 7. Collaboration = Complex+ MESSY! Open-ended solutions, No rules of engagement, No one is in charge, Individuals bring baggage. BethBeck,NASA
- 8. Key Ingredients: Motivation Contribution Disruption Collaborative SecretSauce BethBeck,NASA
- 9. What Brings UsTogether? Shared Purpose/Passion Collaboration: Motivation BethBeck,NASA
- 10. Self-fulfillment within community context: Createsocial good Solve problems Demonstrate skills Try something new Collaboration: Motivation BethBeck,NASA
- 11. What do webring to the community? Intellectual + Social + Physical Capital Collaboration: Contribution BethBeck,NASA
- 12. Collaboration: Contribution Teams, likesolutions, come in all shapes and sizes BethBeck,NASA
- 13. Solvers Come inUnexpected Packages Collaboration: Contribution Space Family Robinson: Toronto’s People’s Choice Winner BethBeck,NASA
- 14. Diversity of Thinking: Coders+ Designers + Artists + Makers Divergents + Convergents Deductives + Inductives + Abductives Right Brains + Left Brains Extroverts + Introverts Collaboration: Contribution Vive la différence! BethBeck,NASA
- 15. Challenge deadlines MAGNIFYtensions. Goals & expectations, Methods, Personality quirks, Idea ownership, and Unequal recognition. Individuals differ over: Collaboration: Disruption Uncertainty and change = discomfort, tension, conflict BethBeck,NASA
- 16. Collaboration: Disruption Disruptive thinkingreveals new possibilities! BethBeck,NASA
- 17. BethBeck,NASA Wanted: Disruptive ThinkingNOT Disruptive Behavior! Share ideas, resources, time. Treat each other with respect. Listen. Seek ideas of others. Offer expertise, as needed. Collaborate, don’t dominate. Create Code of Conduct: Collaboration: Disruption
- 18. Collaborative Match-Making Process Tablesorganized by challenge for self-selection. Provide Virtual + Physical Connection Points Nametags designate team interests or skills. BethBeck,NASA
- 19. Collaborative Match-Making Process Notall teams work. Be prepared to referee…if necessary…. BethBeck,NASA
- 20. Collaboration = Complex+ Messy, but WELL worth it! BethBeck,NASA
- 21. Space Apps: Broughtto you by NASA’s Open Gov Team BethBeck,NASA