Ethical Argument Paper

Ethical Argument Paper
This article was exactly what I was looking for when I was searching for sources for my ethical argument paper. My topic is about keeping religion
out of public schools and this author hit every topic along the same lines I would. He is not afraid to say what is needed and brings up some very
interesting points. I especially like how he makes sure to include that no one is trying to take any ones right to pray away. Plus I like how he reminds
us at the end of his paper to keep educating the masses so we can preserve our
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Ethical Dilemma Essay
An ethical dilemma is an incident that causes us to question how we should react based on our beliefs. A decision needs to be made between right
and wrong. I have experienced many ethical dilemmas in my lifetime, so I know that there is no such thing as an ethical dilemma that only affects
one person. I also know that some ethical dilemmas are easier to resolve than others are. The easy ones are the ones in which we can make decisions
on the spot. For example, if a cashier gives me too much change, I can immediately make a decision to either return the money or keep it. Based on
Kant's, categorical imperative there are two criteria for determining moral right and wrong. First, there is universalizability, which states, "the person's
...show more content...
My moral character was being tested and because it could have a negative effect on other people's lives, I wrestled with my own beliefs. I needed a
2 plan that worked best for all involved, and one that would not cause me to compromise my morals. I will discuss the dilemma, how it affected me,
and how I made a decision I could live with.
In my profession as a technology consultant one of my responsibilities were to work with the sales team to assist in the architecture of Information
Technology solutions to solve customer problems. I worked with the salespeople throughout the sales process to ensure that customers purchased
all products necessary for a successful implementation. One of my responsibilities was to make a final review of sales quotes to verify no
mistakes were made. When I traveled outside of my territory to work with customers, the sales quotes were reviewed by consultants from that area.
The dilemma occurred at a customer site outside of my territory. I had never met the salesperson or the customer. The only information I had was a
scope of work for the implementation. When I arrived at the customer site, I was given a copy of the purchase order and directed to the computer
room. I performed an inventory to verify that all products on the purchase order were onsite. As I reviewed the scope of work, I noticed there were
quite a few items on the purchase order that were not necessary for this implementation. To

Ethical Argument
Many people think of their parents or a famous person as their hero however, I chose my husband. He poses the number one ethical principle I rely
on the most. Ethical communicators are honest. Despite how much he love and appreciate me, he will always tell me the truth. Honestly there have
been times where my feelings were hurt nonetheless, I am grateful to know I can always depend on him to tell it like it is. Not everyone wants to hear
the truth, especially if it puts anything they are doing in jeopardy. In addition, being an honest communicator people will cling to you for advice. An
audience expects to hear the truth when you are speaking to them (Verderber & Sellnow, 2011). Factual communication allows your listeners to
embrace your

Ethics Essay
TEST 1 REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. What is an "argument" in philosophy?
A set of claims one of which, called the conclusion, is said to be supported by the other claims, called the premises.
1. Premise
2. Premise
3. Conclusion
2. What do the terms "valid" and "sound" mean?
Valid Argument
If the premises are true, then it follows necessarily that the conclusion is true, or it is logically impossible for the conclusion to be false.
Sound Argument
A valid argument that contains only true premises. Soundness = Truth + Validity.
3. Sketch the "benefits arguments" in favor of harvesting Baby's Theresa's organs.
Set out the premises and conclusion for "Benefits Argument" in the Baby Theresa case.
The Benefits Argument
1. If...show more content...
If one bad thing happens then others will follow after.
1. If we permit any sort of mercy killing, we will have stepped onto a dangerous "slippery slope" down which we will inevitably slide.
2. The mercy killing of Tracy was permissible.
3. Hence, we have stepped onto a dangerous slippery slope (which will lead to the view that all life is cheap).
Objection: Are the causal claims supported by any evidence? In general, it is easy to make dire predictions concerning the future. Consider an analogy:

Would gay marriage lead to the disintegration of the family?
6. What does Rachels's "minimum conception of morality" consist of?
Morality is, at the very least, the effort to guide one's conduct by reason–while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one's
decision. Reason and impartiality consist stuff
7. What are five common features of Cultural Relativism?
1.Different societies have different moral codes.
2. (a) The "good" is determined by society; (b) an act is "right" if it is allowed by the guiding ideals od the society in which it is performed, and
"wrong" if it forbidden by those ideals.
3. There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one society's code as better than an other's.
4. The moral code of our society has no special status.
5. We should adopt an attitude to tolerance.
8. What is the "Cultural Differences" argument for Cultural Relativism? Does Rachels think it is sound? he thinks it is

Is it Ethical? Essay
From a young age, individuals learn about what is right and what is wrong. According to Sandra Crosser, Ph.D., many young children do not have a
clear understanding of right and wrong. As children grow, their views on the world develop. Many will argue that children gain their morals from their
parents; others say that children get their morals from the people that they interact with. The development of morals is a topic of controversy in both
the scientific and philosophical/ethical communities. When thinking about higher education and the role ethics play on the individuals, many
psychologists and other professions have considered whether or not universities are capable of creating ethical individuals, or if students develop their
ethics...show more content...
Chen, Dalton, and Crosby begin by discussing how, "moral and religious values were a centerpiece of institutional mission" (Chen). But these authors
discuss as years pass, the value of ethical/moral education has changed. Chen, Dalton, and Crosby state, "By the 1960s, most colleges and universities
in the United States, including many historically faith oriented institutions, had adopted a secular orientation that relegated matters of faith and
religion to the private realm of students' lives and increasingly to the periphery of academic life" (Chen). In the 1960s, ethics and morals were not as
prominent in students' education, as it had been in earlier years. "Over the past twenty years, concern has grown that American higher education is
failing its legacy and responsibility for encouraging moral and civic capacities so critical in a democratic society"(Chen). Chen, Dalton, and Crosby
are demonstrating why they believe that schools are responsible for creating ethical individuals. Chen, Dalton, and Crosby have heard "College
officials [from schools where ethics courses are not required] are now reporting greater student interest and participation in campus organizations and
activities that have a spiritual and ethical focus" (Chen). This example demonstrates that ethics are acquired before the individual enters a college and

Ethics Of Abortion Essay
What are the ethics of Abortion? I believe ethics of abortion is a controversial topic, in which it involves the act of removing a fetus from the womb
of a woman's body. This bioethical issue has been an ongoing debate for over forty years now. For many people, abortion is a moral issue, concerning
the rights of a fetus and a woman's right over her own body. What are your moral beliefs about abortion and a woman's right to having one? I am a
Pro–Choice supporter. I believe a woman has the right to make the ultimate decision on what she wants to do with her own body–safe and legally.
However, I don't believe that abortion should be used as a form of birth control or contraception. Society today, approaches discussions about abortion
with caution; for many in society today, believe that it's an act of murder and against all Godly ways. On the contrary, others like myself believe that
under certain livelihood circumstances, the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy should be a...show more content...
Very disturbing! Terminating the right of having an abortion for woman would only do more harm than good in my opinion, it would increase the
poverty and mental health levels in the U.S.A. today. These horrific dilemmas, would then lead to more crimes, broken homes, families living on
government assistance and so much more. As an ending result, I believe ethics on abortion brings upon several ethical theories, such as, natural law,
Kant's ethical theory, virtue ethic and a few more but one that stands out the most is of the utilitarian theory. I chose this theory, because a utilitarian
would take into consideration if having an abortion would bring the greatest good as an outcome. Abortion is a personal decision, that woman deserve
the right to

Ethics in Science Essay
What do you think of when you hear or see the word "science"; test tubes, Einstein, Space? Science is "generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact
sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact"
(Orwell). Scientists are those who study science by scientific method. These "men of science", which Orwell describes as "a biologist, and astronomer,
perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician", "work by means of induction and deduction, and that by the help of these operations, they, in a sort of
sense, wring from Nature certain other things, which are called natural laws, and causes, and that out of these, by some cunning skill of their own,
...show more content...
This undoubtedly demonstrations the pros and cons of inventions made through science. There are people who abuse medicine, and other creations
from science, for numerous different reasons. Things like guns and nuclear weapons were formed to protect, but with the downside of killing
others. With all of this this being said, should there be a limit to things we make? More importantly, does science have an ethical responsibility to
humanity? I think to answer that question, we need to start with deciding if scientists have an ethical responsibility to humanity. As the saying goes,
with knowledge comes power and with power comes responsibility. However, there can be no limitation on the knowledge obtained from science.
Instead, we must limit what arises from knowledge and power. What are some responsibilities of scientists and the rest of the population? Well, to
start on the broadest sense, science should only be used for the absolute necessary improvement of humanity. It is our ethical responsibility to not
take advantage of science to further the advancement of military power, as we have done with the creation of atomic and nuclear bombs. Is it
responsible to use science for fame, fortune and glory? No, and it is not acceptable, but it is common for people to do so. If, for some reason, we had
the option to save 80% of endangered wildlife through scientific means, but with the consequence of harming the atmosphere, would it be ethical to
continue on? We would have

Ethics Argument Essay
Ethics Argument Essay Jay Bechtel Ethics is the practice of not only understanding where someone is coming from, but also understanding how he or
she got there. Former Supreme Court Justice, Potter Stewart, when commenting on ethics, explained that "ethics" is "knowing the difference between
what you have a right to do, and what is right to do." Potters expression perfectly parallels to any ethical dilemma, as it is not only correct to bring in
different approaches, but also to understand the goal, or as Potter put it– to know the "difference." For the sake of this paper, and for a fair analysis, the
four main ethical approaches will be considered: Virtue, Utilitarian, Justice, and Rights. The academic article "Man and Superman" by renowned
Author, Malcolm Gladwell focuses on many ethical dilemmas in the world of extreme and professional sports, as it raises the question of– "When is
Enhancement acceptable?"–Regarding Natural Versus Engineered athletic ability. He injects: "what qualifies as a sporting chance?" as people should
not be allowed to enhance themselves to compete or catch up with the naturally talented. Honesty, Fairness, and Integrity, counterparts of the Virtue
approach are horribly violated when applied to the ethical dilemma, "Natural versus Engineered" human enhancement. Cross–Country Skier Eero
MГ¤ntyranta, a Finnish man born with a genetic mutation causing irregular production of red blood cells, which in return allowed him to excel in
cross country

Ethical Argument Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Ethical Argument Paper