1. ANALYSIS OF DELHI CWG PROJECT &
MELBOURNE CWG PROJECT
Awanish Kumar Shukla
Saxena
Submitted By:
Rajat
Ankit Shah
Mohnil
Hradesh Varshney

2. Contents





Introduction
Project Management
Completion aspects
Comparing CWG Delhi & Melbourne
Awards to Projects

3. Introduction


CWG 2010 Delhi
CWG 2006 Melbourne
2 Important things

Project Deliverables
ConstraintsEconomy, time, resources, technicality

4. Journey to CWG Delhi &
Melbourn

5. Construction Phase

6. Facilities By Effective
Management

7. Journey with Different Specs

9. Tribute to Master Blaster in this
PPT

10. Melbourne Cricket
Ground redevelopment

12. KEY FACTOR’S
1.Timely completion
2.Within Budget
3.Client satisfaction
4.Lowest accident record
5.Sustainable Structure

13. MEET TO CLIENTS REQUIREMENT “CLEAR
VISON “
• An iconic and globally recognizable roof form
• New corporate entertainment suites
• New media and broadcast facilities
• Upgraded security and crowd control
• Enhanced Member dining and bar facilities
• Construction of a new Long Room
• Member car parking at basement level

14. TIMELY COMPLETION
The civil engineering strategy involved the staged construction of the
athletics facility in short periods between football and cricket seasons in
2004 and 2005, and finally “uncovering” the track in early 2006 in
readiness for the Games.

15. 
Overall project planning, programming, monitoring and reporting. Design
and documentation project planning, programming, monitoring and
reporting.

Advising on appropriate contractual strategies, and assistance in
development/refining of novated design contruction contract.

16. An Environmentaly Sustainable Stadium

Its environmental plan was developed govt
ESD guideline

New construction methods has reduced
energy consumption upto 18 %.

MCC achieved ISO 14001 CERTIFICATION.

17. Comparing this project with CWG 2010- Project held in India

18. DELHI CWG v MELBOURNE
CWG

Time aspect:

Delhi (Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium):- 2003-2010 ( approx. 7yrs)
IOA bid for CWG in May 2003 and formed a special organization.
2004-2005 planning phase (delayed)
2006- 2008 planning clubbed with execution (total mess).
2010 deadline.
I.
II.
III.
IV.

I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
Melbourne Cricket Ground:- 1999-2006
1999 bid application submitted to CGF.
2000 planning completed
2001 execution with designing (phase wise).
2001-2005 functioning for various events along with construction.
2006 opening of the track and welcoming CWG successfully.

19. • Financial aspect:
•
Delhi:-
I.
II.
Estimated budget at the time of bid about Rs.300 cr.
Actual requirement for completion Rs.17,000 cr. (including supplementary
infra and operational costs).
III. Unaccounted hidden costs.
• Melbourne:I. Estimated budget about Rs. 3000 cr.
II. The requirement was more or less the same.
III. Proper planning and utilization of funds.

20. End result:
• Delhi:•
•
•
•
•
No doubt the project was completed but resulted in shear waste of funds for the
same.
The CWG scam exposed the plight of Indian governance and systems.
Largest common wealth held game to date.
Fourth largest multipurpose stadium in India and 51st in the world.
Reduced capacity of Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium’s spectator seats from 78,000 to
60,000.
• Melbourne:• The Melbourne Cricket Ground was redeveloped and redesigned as a
common stadium for many sports events.
• Optimum utilization of time and funds.
• 10th largest stadium in the world.
• Can seat about 100,000 spectators.

21. CONCLUSION
“A large part of the success of the MCG is due to a seamless
integration between engineering and architecture. The result is a
light and transparent new structure that is a fitting evolution on
the ongoing history of this remarkable place.”