The Communist Manifesto Marx And Engels

The Communist Manifesto Marx And Engels
For Karl Marx, the analysis of social class, class structures and changes in those structures are key to understanding capitalism and other social
systems or modes of production. In the Communist Manifesto Marx and Engels comment that the history of all hitherto existing society is the history
of class struggles. Analysis of class divisions and struggles is especially important in developing an understanding of the nature of capitalism. For
Marx, classes are defined and structured by the relations concerning (i) work and labour and (ii) ownership or possession of property and the means of
production. These economic factors more fully govern social relationships in capitalism than they did in earlier societies. While earlier societies
contained various strata or groupings which might be considered classes, these may have been strata or elites that were not based solely on economic
factors like that of priesthood, knights, or military elite.
Marx 's theories about society, economics and politics, which are collectively known as Marxism, argue that all society progresses through the dialectic
of class struggle. He was heavily critical of the current socio–economic form of society, capitalism, which he called the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie
," believing it to be run by the wealthy middle and upper classes purely for their own benefit, and predicted that it would inevitably produce internal
tensions which would lead to its self–destruction and replacement by a new system,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Mussolini Cause Ww2
The laws of cause and effect govern our lives, the consequences of the actions we take can have sizable impacts on the world. Keynote speaker
Stephan Covey once said that "While we are free to choose our actions, we are not free to choose the consequences of those actions." Why did
Mussolini choose to make the choices he did? The consequences that occurred from the actions taken by Mussolini were one of the biggest causes of
World War Two. Mussolini's rise to power through the creation offascism against democracy, opposition against Marxism for dictatorship, and utilizing
extreme nationalism had major consequences to ultimately cause World War Two. Mussolini's Rise to power was the most important cause to WW2
because he forged the paramilitary ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Fascism is a government system led by an all–powerful dictator who emphasized racist and nationalist views. Some effects of Italy after the war caused
numerous problems including negatively affecting the economy, riots, and unemployment (evidence). As fascism against democracy rose partially
through nationalistic views, the people of Italy looked at fascist leaders like Mussolini to fix the many problems. Mussolini used the Black Shirts, his
gangs of thugs, to promote the fascist views of anti–anarchy, while ironically causing chaos and suggesting that he was the ultimate champion of order
and law (evidence). Although German and Italian Fascism contrasted in some ways the fascism of Italy allowed for Germany's "final solution" to start
being implemented in Germany, which was a cause of WW2. Fascism in Italy caused the alignment of Germany and Italy, causing

Marxism And The Marxist Theory Of Karl Marx
Intro – Karl Marx, born 1818, a founder of sociology and famous for writings such as The Communist Manifesto, was an influential ideologist during
the 1800's whose ideas focused on historical materialism and whose philosophy tended to focus on the understanding of a capitalist society, he aimed to
create a materialist analysis, being a historical account, which examines the means in which humans collectively produce the necessities for life. Class–
One of the main focuses of Marx's ideology was class, the belief that all human history is just a succession of form of class societies. Under a
capitalist state there is believed to be three class categories the landowners, capitalists and wage labourers but Marx theorised the emergence of only...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Marx believed that the existence of these two classes will lead to an eventual conflict, an uprising of the proletariat by seizing production from the
bourgeoisie leading to a 'dictatorship of the proletariat', Marx stated in a letter to J. Wedeymeyer "And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for
discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. Long before me bourgeois historians had described the historical
development of this class struggle and bourgeois economists, the economic anatomy of classes. What I did that was new was to prove: (1) that the
existence of classes is only bound up with the particular, historical phases in the development of production, (2) that the class struggle necessarily
leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat, (3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless
society", a communist state where law would hold no real place, similar to the events of the Russian Revolution of 1917. In Marx's key work The
Communist Manifesto, he drives home his belief that the divide between these two classes

Marxist Revolutions And Early 20th Century Essay
Introduction to the Parameters of Analysis Because are so many different kinds of revolutions with their own theoretical frameworks, I will analyze
the merits of Marxism as it unfolds in the various authors. Because the writers speak of a particular time and place, all examinations will limit itself to
the Europe in the lifetimes of the authors, drawing from V for Vendetta and modernity mostly as counterexamples. Therefore, this paper will focus on
Marxist revolutions in mid–19th century to early 20th century Europe. With regards to the definitions of success and failure, there is a difference
between what political leaders would see as successful and what philosophers and theorists would see as successful but so far as theorists laid the
foundation of revolution from which political leaders justify their revolution, then the standards of success and failure depend on the extent to which
the new revolutionary society carries the final stage of the revolution set out by philosophers, which in our case are the Marxists. From here we must
evaluate the multiple stages of change for a true revolution to occur and how they affect 4 levels of society: the revolutionist, the masses, the old elite,
and the state. Without the revolutionist, however, there is no revolution therefore all analysis must begin there. From understanding the revolutionists
we can begin to analyze the long term objective of their revolution and the mechanism by which they achieve that goal. The other 3

Marxist View Of What Law Is The Foundation Of Society And Law
1.Marxists argue that control of the means of production is the foundation of society and law is a reflection of that dynamic. Do you agree? Discuss.
"Law is only a superstructure; in reality it only translates the interests of those who hold the reins of command in any given society; it is an instrument
in the service of those who exercise their 'dictatorship' in this society because they have the instruments of production within their control."
For Marx there were two distinct classes in society, the ruling class, the owners of the means of production, the "Bourgeoisie" and the ruled class, the
"Proletariat". The quote, with which I begin this essay, clearly explains the Marxist view of what law is in a given society. For Marxists... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Those in power within the law–making bodies are quite clearly what Marx would consider bourgeois: they are highly paid, highly educated
individuals who have a means of controlling how (and indeed what) laws are put in to place. Arguably it is unavoidable, to find ourselves in a
situation, in which, we have a select group in society in positions of power, who can implement and change legislation. Most would argue that these
people have been democratically elected, and chosen by democratic means. Marxists believe that the bourgeoisie have the control of law–making
bodies and thus make laws which are favourable towards their social class whilst penalising the proletariat. We can see this expressed in the Communist
Manifesto
"Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the
will of your class made in to a law for all".
This statement highlights the Marxist belief that control of the means of creation of law, allows for the creation of laws which could be seen as
coercive and controlling. An example of these, unjust laws, within our society which coincide with this Marxist view could be the under–occupancy
charge, more commonly known as the "bedroom tax." Under this legislation we see a reduction in housing benefits for people who have

Jeremy Bentham And Utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham was an English philosophy (1748–1632) who challenged the idea of the Social Contract theory, which states that the people create a
social contract to agree to form of government. Bentham opposed the idea of natural rights and followed the idea of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is
the idea that political and moral decision should not be based on natural rights, but based on which choice produces the "greatest good for the
greatest number". For an example, this principle explains whether a student should start a food fight or not. The food fight could cause injuries (i.e
someone slipping on food), property damage, and extra work for the people who must clean it up. Starting the food fight may produce good for some
people, but... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The only way to fix this would be through a classless society. In this society, there would be no churches, and no one would have to pay for their
personal properties. Money would basically be none existent, as people will contribute to the things they want. In the Communist Manifesto, Karl
Marx writes "Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive home of the power to
subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation" (Caste 265). Under this classless society "communism", everyone would be on equal
grounds with no more classes. Everyone would also be given the necessities they need to live, such as a home. By doing this, Marx thought it would
eliminate capitalism, which would eliminate the greediness of people. Comparison As stated earlier, utilitarianism is the idea that political and moral
decisions should be not be based on the pursuit of natural rights (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness), but based on the decision of which choice
would produce the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. In other words, one should not be selfish when it comes to making decisions. That
is what utilitarianism and Marx's classless society has in common. Marx's classless society is also trying to eliminate the greediness of society, which
is a form of selfishness. Both philosophies are ultimately trying to better society in their own way, but both are trying to eliminate the

Trotsky 's Assessment Of The Continuity Between Stalinism...
Trotsky's assessment of the continuity between Stalinism and Leninism–Bolshevism is valid to a certain extent. It is axiomatic that there is a
multiplicity of factors that seem to correlate Stalinism to Leninism, thus adding validity to Trotsky's assessment of the continuity. However the
"straight–line" theory of the continuity between the two ideological phenomena, implied by Trotsky, undermines the divergence between them. Both
phenomenons rose up in the Soviet Russia during the times of civil unrest, but Stalinism can be seen as more of a "revolution from above" whilst the
Bolsheviks–Leninism can be seen as more of a "revolution from below".
The historical development of Stalinism can be traced and analyzed through its several stages. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, elements of discontinuity are also present as the revolution was perverted by the Stalinist structure as the 'dictatorship of the proletariat" soon
became the dictatorship of Stalin. Furthermore Stalin's theory of "Socialism in One Country" betrayed that of the Marxist–Leninist theory of
propagating socialism to other countries.
In order to fully assess the validity of the statement, two fundamental factors must we must firstly look at. Firstly the aspects of continuity that may
have lead to the the statement.Secondly, factors within the Stalinist regime that illustrate aspects of discontinuity from the Bolshevik regime. Lastly, the
reason for the characterization, on behalf of Trotsky to possibility to give validity to the Stalinist regime, likening that to the popularized
Leninist–Bolshevik regime.
Why does Trotsky legitimize the Stalinist regime as being linked to the Bolsheviks? Trotsky's assessment of the of the Stalinist phenomenon certainly
seems unexpected considering that any link between the two systems would certainly seem to undermine Trotsky's creditably as the appropriate
successor of Lenin.
Trotsky was a renowned revolutionary who played a pivotal role during the Bolshevik Revolutionary. He was born on November 7th, 1879 in
Yanovka, Ukraine, to Jewish parents. In many regards, Trotsky

Communism And Fascism Similarities
The difference between fascism and communism can be difficult to tell, other times it's simple to tell. Fascism is a form of government in which the
state has all the power. Fascism is an authoritarian and nationalistic right–wing system of government and social organization. Communism is a form of
socialism, that abolishes private ownership of land. Communism is a member of the left wing system of government and organization. While
communism and fascism may be slightly similar, they are different.
The idea of communism originated in a writing by Karl Marx, in which he explained communism as a dictatorship of the proletariat. Although Marx,
wrote of a perfect dictatorship of the proletariat, this has sadly not been seen as possible. Throughout

The Communist Manifesto
Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in 1848 amidst a wave of revolutions that were changing the political course of Europe. The Manifesto is
one of the most influential political writings throughout the world. The Communist Manifesto put forward a unique view on the relevance and
significance of history which relied more heavily on economical distinctions than revolutionary progress. It also proposed a process, by which the
working proletariat class would overthrow the ruling bourgeoisie class and create a classless society in which private property would be abolished.
However, if looked at closely the Manifesto contains some contradictions and oversimplifications that allow communism to be suspect to
misinterpretation and manipulation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the overthrow of the bourgeoisie the communists' goal is to create a classless society in which private property will be abolished in favor of a
state controlled common labor system. While this ideally would be a solution to the immoralities of bourgeois society, it places a great deal of trust in
the hands of the few, who in theory could be just as immoral and exploitative as the old bourgeois society. However, incapitalism, Marx argues, the
worker only labors for the advancement of the bourgeoisie, but in a communist society his work serves only to better the society as a whole, and
therefore his own life as well. The bourgeoisie will object to the abolishment of things such as religion, laws, political science, and morality, that have
all stood up to the test of time, saying that these are eternal truths that are common to all history. However Marx replies that "the Communist revolution
is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideals"
(52) This chapter also lays out ten key principles to the communist ideology. These include the abolition of private property and inheritance, a large
income tax, centralization of the economy and transportation in the hands of the state, the establishment of a common labor system, and free public
education for

A Very Breif Biography of Karl Marx
Karl Marx was born in Trier in Prussia in 1818, and he passed away in London in 1883. The overall approach characterized in Marx's theoretical
writings and his analysis of capitalism can be defined as historical materialism, or the materialist perception of history. Actually, that view may well be
deemed the foundation of Marxism. Marx contested that the superstructure of society was predicated precisely by the productive roots of society, so
that the main system must always be seen in relation to the roots. The roots are made up by the means of production, in which influences of production
(land, raw materials, capital, and labor) are combined, and in which relations among individuals come forth, determined by their relationship to the
means of production. As Marx said in the preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy in 1859, "The sum total of these relations of
production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which rises a legal and political superstructure and to which
correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the social, political, and intellectual life process
in general." Marx viewed this main system to consist of the family, the culture, the state, philosophy, and religion.
In Marx's opinion, all the aspects of the main system benefitted the interests of the strongest class in a society. He saw the class separation in any
society beyond a primitive level

Marxism And Its Effects On The World 's Republic Of China
During the nineteenth century, in the midst of increased industrialization, worker exploitation, and growing gaps in wealth, Karl Marx formulated a
political theory which would go on to remodel global politics in an unprecedented manner. Marxism, as it would later be known, or more generally,
Communism, was destined to guide countless nations' paths to "liberation." Two countries in particular, the USSR and the People's Republic of China,
can trace their rapid escapes from "backwardness" into industrial powerhouses, and international superpower and rising superpower, respectively, to
their adoption, as well as their exclusive interpretations, of Marxism. However, such flexible and broad adaptations of Marxism to these nations' ...
The aforementioned information is detailed within The Marxian Revolution Chapters 1 and 3. So where did Lenin and Mao diverge from and align
with the ideas of Marx? From the start, Lenin was working with a Russia that did not yet meet the criteria of a conscious proletariat, indicating
readiness for revolution. As such, he amended Marxism to better suit the circumstances of the Russian population. The first manner in which Lenin
contrasts with Marx is through his utilization of a peasant uprising, rather than a worker uprising. At that point in Russia's history, Russia was still in
a feudal phase, where industry has not yet taken off, and the vast majority of the population was peasants, whom were controlled by landlords as well
as the Tsarist Government. Lenin justified the propriety of revolution by asserting that Russia was in a state of capitalism. Lenin further diverged from
Marx in the fact that Marx believed that the revolution should be lead by the self aware proletariat, rather than merely consisting of proletarian
participants. However, lacking both a proletariat majority, as well as a conscious class, Lenin determined that the revolution must be lead by an elite
base. As mentioned in Comrades!, Marx greatly feared a preemptive revolution, and it is plausible that such a faulty foundation of Communism in
Russia is what eventually lead to the USSR's downfall. Nonetheless, Lenin proceeded with his Bolshevik Revolution and disbanded with

Transition Of Capitalism: The Communist Manifesto By Karl...
Summary of reading: Karl Marx, the father of Marxism, often misunderstood dreamt more of a utopian society than draconian. Marx envisioned the
world where people worked not for self–fulfillment but the welfare of all. Additionally, Marx's abhorrence for capitalism laid the foundation for
revolutionary ideas and tactics. His exile to England led to the creation of the International Working Men's Association, conversely, the first
international worker's organization. In Marx's book "The Communist Manifesto" he notes three parts: the flaws and injustices of capitalism, second his
Communist vision for society; and lastly, his viewpoint on the misleading doctrines of competing for socialist ideologies. Comparatively, Marx like
Adam Smith, the founder of capitalism, believed that society is governed by certain unchangeable laws and must be rationally examined to predict the
future. This belief led to many people identifying Marxism with "scientific socialism." Although Karl Marx died at a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, Karl Marx believes the state can be nothing more than the dictatorship of the proletariat, or the wage–earners; for this to take place the
proletariat must overthrow the bourgeoisie or the class who owns most of the country's wealth and means of production. In essence, Karl Marx,
believed that there is a chronological order of the development of society from capitalism, which is developing into communism is impossible without a
transition period; the state can only be the revolutionary dictatorship of the working class. After which, the people are no longer wage slaves and no
more classes, then will the state cease to exist and freedom truly comes forth. Nevertheless, Karl Marx believes a capitalistic society conveys a false
democracy, a democracy only for the rich; that communism is only capable of providing a full democracy, a democracy for

Karl Marx and the Ideal Society Essay
Karl Marx and the Ideal Society
One of the greatest debates of all time has been regarding the issue of the freedom of mankind. The one determining factor, for Marx, it that freedom
is linked with class conflict. As a historian, Karl Marx traced the history of mankind by the ways in which the economy operated and the role of
classes within the economy. For Marx, the biggest question that needed to be answered was "Who owns freedom?" With this in mind, Marx gives us a
solution to both the issues of freedom and class conflict in his critique of capitalism and theory of communism, which is the ideal society for Marx. His
theory of communism is based on the "ultimate end of human history" because there will be freedom for all humankind. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Marx dismissed the relevance of all but two of these classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, because they didn't have any real impact on
society as a whole. They weren't in a position to exploit labor. His theory focuses on the conflict and antagonism between those who owned the
modes of production, the bourgeoisie, and those who were forced into selling their labor to them, the proletariat. As Marx saw it, "class is about
the transfer of surplus (profit) from below and the exercise of power from above". The class with the means of material production also has the
means of intellectual control. Those in charge have a political doctrine to control their interests, at whatever cost. This led to what Marx terms
"brain colonization". The concept of ideology was used in the defense of capitalism. It was a strategy used to support the system and keep the
workers concerns quieted. Liberalism was the ideology used by the bourgeoisie. Marx said, "Liberal ideology is used to blind the workers to the
injustice of exploitation". It was an official veil to persuade the masses that they are free by extolling the myths of progress to them. They argued that
since slavery was no longer used for labor, the workers were indeed free. The workers were also told to find happiness and freedom through religion for
their material conditions were as

Comparing Vladimir Lenin 's Eyes And A Capitalist Society
The popular, the majority, the working class, the predominant, the masses. There are countless terms available to describe who has the most
socio–political power, the most weathered; the proletariats. In Vladimir Lenin's eyes, in a capitalist society a proletariat is the term used to describe
the working class, the class that does not have ownership of any means of production(land and capital) and whose sole income source derives from
labor. The minority, who own the majority of the wealth, the means of production, and the means of coercion(law enforcement and legal system). In a
capitalist society, the bourgeoisie exploit the proletariats. Only the bourgeoisie could afford the means of production, therefore they control the
proletariat's... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They would prohibit any Soviet that had a capitalist agenda from gaining any socio–political power, therefore creating the first completely proletarian
government, made by and for the working class. Another example of where this method was applied is the Chinese Communist Revolution. Qu
Lindong, a prominent Chinese historian at the University of Beijing, describes "Marxism as the dominant outlook in[Chinese] history." In fact, the
Chinese Revolution was championed by Mao Zedong, a devout believer in the Marxism–Leninism revolutionary theories, whom attempted to apply the
techniques used by Lenin in the Russian Revolution, adapted slightly to fit China's socio–political needs, to his own nation. Both of these revolution's
occurred for the same reason; the majority's exasperation in their respective, unequal social structure. Essentially, the working class got tired of being
exploited and suppressed by the ruling class, and decided to take a stand against them, as one unit. The Chinese Revolution was similar to the Russian
Revolution because, once capitalism reigned globally supreme, the only type of revolt that could occur is the overthrow of capitalism by the conscious
revolutionary acts of the proletariat. Therefore, almost all revolutions are based on class conflict and

How Karl Mark Views Was Influenced By Views Of The...
In order to make a connection of how Karl Mark views, was in some way, influenced by certain views of the Enlightenment. But, first, we need to
understand what characteristics we can compare of the two. The idea of Enlightenment was an intellectual movement that took place around the late
17th and 18th centuries. This movement had placed emphasis on progress, social structure, materialism, state and individualism. From class lectures
and from the readings of the Communist Manifesto, we can derive the idea that Marx was against social class. With Marx understanding the dire need of
reform within the social structure, he believed in a form of equality for all, stating that not one person would be higher than the other.
He, along with other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was the idea that you are literally taking the lower class of people, the people who are non–land owner, who have no wealth, and now could have a
say in government affairs, in comparison to those who do have the wealth and are landowners. This idea is now providing the lower class people the
power of decision–making, the power of influence. This idea of a democratic state was seen as perhaps, the most radical of all thoughts of a state.
3.
If we can take Marx's and Engel's phrase of "dictatorship of the proletariat," it can be interpreted as the state's power is in the control of the working
people, not the higher classes. This idea was directed towards having finally separated capitalism and communism. According to spunk, a website I've
found, it states that it is " the vehicle of abolishing the state" (spunk.org). The necessity of having the phrase "dictatorship of the proletariat" was to
create a progressive life for the workers, an equality way of living and ruling. On the same website it states that the need to create this proletariat–led
state, was to "...suppress capitalist resistance, and develop the nationalized means of production as rapidly as possible in order to overcome relative
scarcity and shorten the workday, this allowing all workers to participate in the affairs of society" (Spunk.org). 4.
The Marxist concept of "withering away of the state," is in reference to the idea of known social institutions of the state that will

Class And Class Struggle Essay
The concept of class and class struggle have existed ever since there have been the presence and prevalence of the modes of production and
commoditization. Individuals in the society are placed to various levels of hierarchy, on the chronological order following the pattern of those who
possess the most commodities at the top most tiers followed by those who do not in the lower tiers.
Karl Marx brings to our understanding that he is not to be held responsible for or given merit for discovering the existing classes in the modern
society. He also asserts that he is not to be provided any merit of identifying and highlighting the constant mutual struggle between theses classes in
the society. He rather gives emphasis to his contributions in proving that classes and its existence is connected only to certain historical phases of
development of production. He is also to be given stature for highlighting the fact that "The Class Struggle leads necessarily to the dictatorship of the
proletariat and that the dictatorship itself is only a transitional stage leading to the abolition of classes and to a classless society..." Marx hence regards
classes and class struggles as a stage in the historical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Marxism and its explanation do not limit itself to just monetary and economic factors. It also takes into account the subjective and ideological aspects
which play a vital role in the formation of social consciousness. The empirical facet of Marxist theory of classes is the result of the fact that it is
capable of discovering the most important characteristic which underlies the most complex variety of social relations, all the objective and subjective
factors which causes the division of society into classes, strata and

Roy Medvedev Analysis
With the destruction of the Tsarist regime, Russia stood at a crossroads no state had ever been at. For the first time ever, a Socialist nation advocating
Communism had managed to create a functioning state. The works of Marx and Engels, pushed forth as the cure for the oppression of the proletariat,
had fallen successfully on the ears of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, who, with his theory of the Vanguard party, pushed the Russian Empire into the Soviet era.
Leninism became the central tenant of the Soviet system, being advocated and admired by every successive Soviet leader, and by many in modern
Russia to this day. The modernity of the issue leads many in modern Russia to justify certain actions, harkening back to Lenin himself, still displayed in
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The virtues of one are inherently found in the other, the downfalls of one, inherently found in the other as well. Lenin's own realization of this near the
end of his life, his insistence on trying to prevent any one man from taking power in the USSR, proves that while attempting to prevent Stalinism,
Lenin's own foundational government set the path for it. Leninism was naturally led to Stalinism, and that must be addressed lest it be used to justify,
misleadingly, the same once

The Link Between the Industrial Revolution and Socialism...
The Industrial Revolution was period of rapid economic and social growth during the mid 18th and early 19th centuries. The new found power of coal
and iron made for many new innovations in machinery. Not all of the Industrial Revolution's changes were physical. A new ideology arose from the
sweat of the working class: socialism. Socialism is a political theory advocating state or collective ownership of property and industry opposed to
private ownership. To fully understand the relationship between the Industrial Revolution and socialism, one must first be comfortable with the
Revolution and its changes, socialism itself, and the fine line of events linking the two together. The Revolution began in Britain and over the course of
a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once in complete control, it would abandon its dictatorship to form a higher state of democracy then had been seen before. He thought then that the
classes which separated people would surely fall as the bourgeois withered away. He believed that people must liberate themselves. On the other hand,
Eduard Bernstein's revisionist socialism wanted the proletariat to rise to power through democratic office and reforms. He believed that the change
should be more of an evolution rather than a revolution. The revisionist also did not want the proletariat to be in total control. The socialists, believing
everyone is equal, saw that the proletariat was being treated poorly and knew that would have to change. The cruel working conditions and little civil
rights made a gap that no single man could cross without help. Many believed that socialism was the key. Socialism grew from the problems of the
Industrial Revolution. The relationship of the Revolution to socialism was that of a problem to a solution, respectively. If not for the Industrial
Revolution, the problems between the classes would never have grown so apparent. Then again, without the Industrial Revolution the world would be
stuck in the past. While the Industrial Revolution shaped the modern world of today, it also caused problems that, in theory, only

Essay A Comparison of Capitalism and Marxism
A Comparison of Capitalism and Marxism
This essay will compare the economic principles of capitalism and communism by giving brief historical background on both and describing the two. I
will begin with the father of economy, Adam Smith, and finish with the theories of Karl Marx.
Adam Smith believed that if everyone behaves selfishly we are doing what is best for the economy of our society. This is what is known as
"enlightened selfishness." "Enlightened selfishness" is one of the main elements of capitalism. Profit is the motive for production of goods and greed is
a virtue. You can own private property, but to maintain that private property you need capital to invest. Investing in something is always a risk. The
larger the risk, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The workers were, in general, unskilled and often repeated the same series of actions for 12 hours a day. The owners were the people profiting the
most from this system. Because the common worker was so easy to come by and easy to underpay, the owners could have a higher profit. All of this
and child labor too. Children and women were under paid even more so than men. Urbanization forced the creation of working class districts. These
slums had no running water, diseases such as small pox and typhus were commonplace, people were clustered around the factories creating crowded
flats and mortality rates were incredibly high. Marx and others saw capitalism as going hand–in–hand with these horrors.
Communism is considered a reaction to the "evils of capitalism." Another way of saying communism is "dialectical materialism." Karl Marx borrowed
many ideas from the ideas of Gregor Hagel. Karl Marx was a German professor and theoretician, he published 2 famous works The Communist
Manifesto (1848) and Das Kapital (1866). Before he could finish Das Kapital he died, Friedrich Engels finished the book. Frederik Angles was a
collaborator of Marx's and co–author of the book. Marx saw the exploitation of the common worker and predicted a revolution that would see the rise
of the proletariat against the capitalistic suppressors. Proletariat is a term used by Marx to describe the working class. He also

The Russian Revolution Of 1917
The Russian Revolution of 1917 swept the country into an entirely new epoch, changing a monarch–led country into the Soviet Union and spreading
the red of communism in waves through generations. A powerful team of Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky organized the Bolsheviks, or Red Army, in
political and military strategy against the Menshevik White Army. Part of their success came from the lack of unification of the Mensheviks. While the
White Army banded together under a simply 'anti–Bolshevik' policy, the Red Army was spurred on by one philosophy:communism. However, only the
broader–picture ideals of the Communist Manifesto directly influenced the Bolsheviks. Instead they modified Marx's teachings, because Lenin
believed Marx's plans were created specifically for Germany, and because Russia had not achieved the high level of industrialization needed for a
full proletariat revolution. As a result, the literal teachings of the Communist Manifesto were lost in the whirl of Lenin's socialist dictatorship and
Bolshevik propaganda, but in the end, Russia was still moving towards communist goals. From early on, Lenin was well acquainted with Marx and
Engels' works and referenced them often in his writing. His wife Nadezhda wrote, 'In his first big work, published illegally by him in 1894, "Who are
the Friends of the People?" there are quotations from the "Communist Manifesto," the "Critique of Political Economy," the "Poverty of Philosophy,"
"German Ideology," "The Letter of Marx

Communism In The United States: Summary
In the United States, people tend to believe that communism is always dystopian, and fear it. Although communism can be dystopian, it is not always,
because the main ideology of communism is that every person is equal. The word "communism" is "derived from the Latin communis, meaning
'shared' or 'common'" (Dagger, Ball). The meaning of the word itself shows that the idea of communism is not always malicious. The ideology of
communism was originally created by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, in 1848. The reason the book was written was because the authors believed that
the working class should control the government. They believed that in a truly communist society, there would be no "class divisions" (Dagger, Ball).
Since communism involves ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Marx and Engels, the bourgeoisie are always oppressive, and the proletariat are always oppressed by the bourgeoisie. The labor theory
of value presumes that all of the value in a product comes from the labor it took to create it. This would suggest that since the proletariat are the
working class that creates products,they should be the upper class, instead of the bourgeoisie. The theory of the nature of state assumes that all forms
of government are tools of the bourgeoisie to help oppress the proletariat, which is why, in theory, communism does not have any official government.
They also believe that religion is the opiate of the masses, and this suggests that the bourgeoisie created religion to suppress proletarian uprisings. The
last theory, the communist dictatorship of the proletariat, says that since government is a tool of the bourgeoisie, it must be overthrown in a violent
and bloody revolution, and replaced with a totalitarian dictatorship that will set up economic collectivism (Milligan). Economic collectivism is when
all people do their jobs, and get paid the same amount for

Rosa Luxemburg
Rosa Luxemburg
Before one can even attempt to discuss the Marxists of the World, one must examine and define the meaning of the term itself. What is the definition
of Marxism? How did it come about? How did it change through the years?
" Marxism is the system established by Marx and Engles. The foundation of Marxism is based on Dialectical Materialism––––a way of understanding
reality; whether thoughts emotions, or the material world. Through this Marx and Engles examined history, which led them to explain class struggle
and the basis of social relations throughout economics"
Marx's Communist Manifesto was the first systematic statement of modern socialist doctrine. Marx contributed the central propositions of the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For Marx, then, the limits of capitalism are given by the social production relations as value relations, while for Rosa Luxemburg capitalism cannot
exist at all, except through the absorption of its surplus–value by pro–capitalist economies. " Rosa Luxemburg's theory was quite generally regarded as
an aberration and an unjustified criticism of Marx". Yet her critics were just as far removed from Marx's position as was Rosa Luxemburg herself.
Most of theme critics adhered either to a crude under consumption theory, a theory of disproportionality, or a combination of them. Lenin, for example,
"saw the cause for crises in the disproportionalities due to the anarchic character of capitalist production, and merely added to Tagan–Baranowsky's
arguments that of the under consumption of the workers".
She met with many Russian Social Democrats (at a time before the R.S.D.L.P. split); among them the leading members of the party: Gregory
Plekhanov and Pavel Axelrod. It was not long before Luxemburg voiced sharp theoretical differences with the Russian party, primarily over the issue
of Polish self–determination. Luxemburg believed that self–determination weakened the international Socialist movement, and helped only the
bourgeoisie to strengthen their rule over newly independent nations. Luxemburg split with both the Russian and Polish Socialist Party over this issue,
who believed in the rights of Russian national

Marxism Midterm Essay : State And Revolution
Marxism Midterm Essay: State and Revolution Sarah Elberling University of Denver State and Revolution The early 20th century socialist
revolutionary theorists Vladimir Lenin, Rosa Luxembourg and Leon Trotsky believed that the withering away of the state and the removal of the
capitalist mode of production was a necessary outcome if the individual was to ever realize their true nature as being free, equal and self–determining.
This, however, could only be achieved through the development of the proletariat's class consciousness and their defeat over the bourgeoisie. It is in
this manner where both socialist revolutionary theory and practice share a dialectical relationship. However untied in their revolutionary visions of this
international process, these theorists differ in what the role and functions of the revolutionary party should be in the historical development of the new
socialist state. For Lenin and Trotsky, they envisage the revolutionary vanguard party as being separate from the proletariat class. Their reasoning being
that the working class themselves would remain limited by their own trade's union consciousness and therefore, would need the assistance of the
Central Committee to lead them in the methods to achieve the socialist revolution. For Luxembourg, however, the vanguard party would need to be
rooted and systematically connected to the proletariat class itself in order for the revolution's spontaneity and organizational dialectic

Marx 's Manifesto Of The Communist Party Essay
Karl Marx, lived between 1818 and 1883, was a humanist, materialist, and a philosopher, not an economist, contrary to popular belief. "[...] a man
engaged in endless internecine political and philosophical warfare" (Menand, 2016, pg. 2). He is the author to the popular text, "Manifesto of the
Communist Party" (1848), where Marx defined communism, discussed how industrial capitalism is evil, alienation versus objectification, liberation
from alienation, types of class struggles in society, dialectical materialism, and socialism. Marx have always been harshly criticized for his advocacy of
communism, but often times, it's only because people fail to understand Marx's communism (Marxism). The communism that modern days' people
came to know of are through the political system of Russia, China, North Korea, Vietnam, among other communist countries, where it's controlled
through absolute dictatorship and human's freedom is reduced; the rise of state capitalism and crude communism. In this essay, I will define
communism based Marx's definition in his text, "Manifesto of the Communist Party", and explore why and how communism has been distorted for
political purposes.
Communism was based on the premise of the working class. Marx referred to them as the Proletariat. For clarification, one's wealth and income aren't
to be mistaken as class identity; Marx declared that the relationship of ownership (master versus slavery) is what define the class one belongs to.
Hence, throughout the

Marx's Ideal Society
One of the greatest debates of all time has been regarding the issue of the freedom of mankind. The one determining factor, for Marx, it that freedom
is linked with class conflict. As a historian, Karl Marx traced the history of mankind by the ways in which the economy operated and the role of
classes within the economy. For Marx, the biggest question that needed to be answered was "Who owns freedom?" With this in mind, Marx gives us a
solution to both the issues of freedom and class conflict in his critique of capitalism and theory of communism, which is the ideal society for Marx. His
theory of communism is based on the "ultimate end of human history" because there will be freedom for all humankind. Marx saw communism as the
ideal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This false consciousness was necessary to keep the proletariat's minds from ideas of rebellion. He questioned what would happen if it stopped working.
Would the liberals turn to the real drug to continue the myths of the bourgeoisie?
It is interesting to note that Marx also saw the benefits of capitalism. He claims that capitalism is not evil, just outdated. He agreed that it was a very
efficient means of production. However, he asserts that capitalism leads to social dislocation, when workers are forced to find work elsewhere, and
human suffering, the alienation of workers. The end result from this will be the collapse of capitalism. History is constantly changing and that a new
class war was inevitable, one between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie.
Alienation of the workers, for Marx, was seen as imposed on "a class that has to bear all the burdens of society without enjoying its advantages". This
alienation forces that class "into the most decided antagonism to all other classes". Furthermore, it is the capitalists system that necessitates such
alienation. In a capitalist society, over the long term, fewer and fewer people will own the means of production and the proletariat will be ever
increasing. This happens because of the bourgeoisie's need to protect and maximize profits. Although Marx believed that human identity and
consciousness should be attained from the work one

What Is The Satire In Animal Farm
During the totalitarian reign of Joseph Stalin, he was responsible for the deaths of some fifteen to twenty million people (Naimark 11–12). The
allegorization of these atrocities and other incidents can be seen in the novella Animal Farm, a political satire written by the novelist George Orwell.
The story covers the intentional, erroneous interpretation of the socialist ideals that allowed for the deposition of the last Russian Czar. With the pig
Napoleon portraying the tyrant Joseph Stalin, it is demonstrated how corruption can occur when influence is superadded by authority. However, the
aspirations of a single man weren't the only things responsible for the effective genocide of a mass of people. The citizenry played a role in the
toleration of a dictatorial regime, either through being apolitical or ignorant to what was happening around them. In Animal Farm, George Orwell
cleverly writes a host of creatures that symbolize the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Not unlike others in real life, Benjamin understood the situation with the pigs. However, he predicted that life would continue on as the same (Orwell
12, 20). Therefore, he decided to not encourage the rise of the pigs, but he did not impede their progress either. Hence, as a passive member of the
populace, he contributed to the rise of the totalitarian regime.
George Orwell brilliantly demonstrates how aspiring dictators aren't the only problem in the rise of autocracies. The populace plays a large role in the
process, and their inaction or ignorance contributes, regardless of ill–intent. Orwell was able to successfully send this message through the
implementation of three key characters. In Animal Farm, George Orwell cleverly writes a host of creatures that symbolize the submissive nature and
passiveness of a populace that allows for the continuation of a

Vladimir Lenin's Conception Of The Vanguard Party
Vladimir Lenin's conception of the Vanguard [Communist] Party developed from his commitment to bring about a revolution of Communist ideals.
Lenin thought that this Communist Party is the "organ of revolutionary consciousness" to keep the revolution in the eyes of the proletariat (COFI
1993). The Vanguard Party helps the proletariat carry out its goals of revolution by promoting class consciousness. According to Lenin, the concept of
the Vanguard Party was quite simple. At the forefront of the Russian Revolution of October 1917, there was a need to establish political consciousness
of the proletariat as a whole. The proletariat needed to understand its objectivity in economic society and the Vanguard Party was going to help achieve
that goal. Because the party was a grassroots type organization, the proletariat would develop consciousness through a collective struggle of the masses.
This collective struggle would later transform to be the basis of the party. This collective struggle was also necessary since the proletariats class
consciousness and revolutionary outlook aren't even distributed among the proletariat. Further, political consciousness would develop through a
dialectical method of thought and action/transformation. This dialectical method would compel the proletariat to become conscious of the injustices
they face and form a revolutionary party to carry out their ideals. The Vanguard Party will help transform this consciousness to revolutionary
communism through

Proletariat In Russia Essay
The Proletariat in Russia A proletariat is a key figure in the philosophy of Karl Marx. A proletarian is someone who does not own any means of
production. Their only income comes from selling their own workforce. In the Russian language "proletariat" is describing their working class. In the
middle of the 19th century, German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels saw the "ghost of communism." They both believed the proletariat
would change this revolution. A revolution is an open measurement of strength between social forces in a struggle for power. Marx strongly believed
this could happen if only all proletarians would unite. Engels believed that any small businessman who could not compete with the rich people will join
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His ideas sounded very beneficial and sounded like they could be persuaded easily. They also were thought to be unintelligent. The proletariat in
Russia is represented well in this novel. Each animal represents a member in the working and unskilled class but Boxer and Clover are the leaders.
Boxer is the metaphor for the Boxer rebellion in China. This occurred in the early 20th century. This was the beginning of communism and its form
of government. Boxer, Clover, and the other low society animals have no way to compare Mr. Jones (Czar) government to Napoleon (Stalin)
government. They are treated the same in both because they are unskilled and unintelligent. But the animals were persuaded into thinking there were
getting treated right and fairly. This book did a very good job representing this topic. It was easy to understand what Russia was really like during this
time. But Boxer got taken for granted. The importance of the proletariat is shown when Boxer gets sent away on the glue truck to the slaughter house
and the work productivity decreases. Animal Farm could not have have represented the proletariat in Russia any better. It gave specific examples that
grasped the reality. It was a barnyard farm with with a government of powerful

Is Communism Possible?
The belief that, since the Occupy Movement brought attention to Communal Living, more and more Americans are coming out as Socialists, or even
as Communists; is true. The question for all of them, however, is can it even be done in our country? Is American Communism possible? A simple
answer – on an immediate large scale – no. Pure and Simple, no large population has ever successfully completed the Communist agenda; but can it be
done period? Yes,Communism, at its base, is a return to the way human beings lived before, Government by The People, not for them. Communism is
not an absolution of Government, at any rate; it is the mass socialization of the Governance. The duty of the Proletariat Dictator is not to make
decisions on a long term scale, rather to involve as many diverse people as possible, strategically, in meaningful Governance of The People; and then
to absolve themselves of the Dictatorship. The large scale proletariat Government that results would be capable of involving the majority of the
population in self–governance.
The only means by which this can be successfully accomplished is on a small ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rather, a successful Communist state would be absent in your ability to work; say you buy a boat, you buy your own nets, and the Government has no
say in you going out on the Water to fish; however, you would be asked for a consistent percentage of the gross profit, or even possibly the catch itself;
if you are using the boat, and nets for monetary accumulation. No matter the size, weight or profit brought by the catch, each man would pay the same
amount. In Communism, this is better known as Equivalent Exchange – you give yourself what you need, pay an amount to the Government, and
make your profit from the rest – the Government is responsible for making sure the percentage given to them is re–distributed to the populous
according to their individual

1984 Marxist Analysis
ISP Rough Copy
A class struggle between two economic divisions is not just about the distinction and conflict but also the ideology of dominance that the "have's" has
set on the "have not's". The most general way of understanding economic structure within a literary work is to apply the Marxist Literary Theory.
Marxism is based on the philosophy of Karl Marx, which follows the idea that life within an economic system is the struggle between social classes.
The literary criticism is based on the belief that historical social and economic conditions determine literary works. Marxist literary theory examines a
text containing a power structure between two groups, the Proletariat and Bourgeoisie, and its representation. An example of a Marxist... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
To further explain, the Party entrenches the ideology to remain unquestioned by those capable of recognizing oppression. According to the Party's
slogan, "who controls the present controls the past" (Orwell 37). Based on Marxist Literary belief, historical conditions determine human thought,
as mind is a product of it historical influences. The Party dominates their people because history is rewritten in their favor. As a result, they will
remain in power because their people's consciences will automatically stay devoted under the party without questioning due to insufficient evidence
to prove otherwise. In addition, the Party is also able to prevent rebellion by instilling "doublethink" into their people's mind. The technique
convinces the brain to believe something to be true when it is not, for example, "2 + 2 = 5". The party is successful in maintaining its power due to
the practice of "doublethink" in which the proletariats are incapable of questioning their position in life: "To a Party member it means loyal
willingness to say black is white when the Party discipline demand this" (Orwell 221). Orwell's use of "doublethink" displays an extreme form of
false consciousness. Marxism describes false consciousness as the inability of the human mind to see things, especially during an exploitation or
oppression for they fail to

Communism And Its Impact On Society And The Production Of...
Communism, the idea I will be looking at the theory of communism, which describes an end to bourgeoisie (private) property, according to Marx. I will
argue that it is not a defensible utopia. I accept that we may not have had a true communist nation, but this highlights the unrealistic nature of
communist, rather than its inevitability as Marx believed. Similarly I will argue the nature of communism as described by Marx necessarily leads to
centralised planning, as market relations are abolished, which can have disastrous effects on society and the production of good and services.
Marxist Communism and utopian socialism The term communism is one fraught with many ideas and beliefs. For some, it stands as a humane
alternative to the capitalist society in which we live, and to others it is associated with misery and tyrannical governments. Malia (1994) argues that
when socialism, sometimes considered a precursor to communism or an interchangeable term with communism, does gain power and inevitably fails, it
is often denounced by other communists as the deterioration into state socialism or, even more confusingly, "state capitalism". This makes it difficult
to evaluate the ill effects of nations that are inspired by socialist or communist ideas when analysing the notion of the communist utopia. Marx' works
represent what is coined as scientific socialism, one that is distinct from the French utopian socialists that influenced much of his work (Yassour 1983;
Hoover

Dialectical Change
Marx embraced Hegel's belief that the driving force of historical change was the dialectic. This refers to a process of development in which
interaction between two opposing forces leads to a further stage. Conflict between a thesis and its opposing force, an antithesis, leads to a higher
level, a synthesis, which, in turn, constitutes a new thesis. However, while Hegel explained dialectical change in terms of ideas or the 'world spirit',
Marx gave the concept a materialist interpretation. Perceiving history as a series of economic stages of society, most of which contain two main
classes, Marx explained historical change by reference to the class conflict within each economic system that eventually led to the collapse of each
class society.

How Far Do You Agree That the Brutality of the Bolsheviks...
How far do you agree that the brutality of the Bolsheviks was the main reason why they remained in power in the years 1917–24?
This essay shall address the issue of how the far the brutality of Bolshevik Regime ensured the maintaining of it's power between the years of 1917–24.
This essay shall explore topics concerning the 'Dictatorship Of The Proletariat', The Cheka, WarCommunism, The Red Terror and other potential
reasons for the Bolsheviks remaining in power. This essay shall also explore the various views put forth by various Historians such as Robert
Conquest and Richard Pipes.
The Dictatorship of the Proletariat was an idea advocated by Lenin throughout the course of the initial years of the Bolshevik Regime. The idea
stemmed ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Russian Civil War (1917–1923) saw millions of deaths and millions further starved. The Bolsheviks saw the importance of maintaining their power
in the cities in order to maintain power over the country itself. To keep the people happy thus, they realised they needed to keep the people fed. This
led top the eventual inception of War Communism. An economic/agricultural policy incorporated by War Communism was known as Prodrazvyorstka
– requisition of agricultural surpluses from peasants in excess of absolute minimum for centralized distribution among the remaining population. This
meant that the Bolsheviks could seize whatever food they needed from the countryside towns and villages and distribute it amongst the urban
population in cities such as Petrograd and Moscow.
The peasants in the countryside did not, however, always co–operate with the Bolshevik authorities when it came to handing over their grain. In 1921,
the sailors at Kronstadt revolted in direct response to slipping living standards and the starvation of people across the country. Soon after the
Bolsheviks led an army 10,000 strong to crush the rebellion, one the revolutionaries were defeated around 1,200 to 2,168 were executed in the days
following the revolt.
The coupling of the starvation brought about by War Communism and the crushing of revolts following War Commusism showed the Bolshevik
Regime to

Lenin Followed Marxism, Stalin Did Not Essay
Marxism was defined by a man named Karl Marx and his associate Fredrich Engels. Basically, Marxism is defined as a conflict theory, as Marx said
that society is separated by a conflict between the rich and the poor. Today, when one thinks about Marx's philosophy, he is often tied as an enemy to
Capitalism due to his ties to Communism. Although he did layout the foundry to Communism as we know it, he never saw it to be how it is today.
He saw it as a way for social egalitarianism; Equality for the poor and rich (the Proletariat and Bourgeoisie); a classless society. He wanted to the big
businesses and factories not to be owned by one man or company as in capitalism, but to be owned by everyone. A concept he called Collective... Show
Lenin's side was known as the "Reds". The Reds won after a bloody war. The campaign became known as the "Red Terror", due to the murders of
thousands of Russian peasants, and the use of thousands more of these peasants or members of the White army into concentration camps as
"enemies of the revolution." Lenin caused a terrible Famine in 1921 when his economic innovations began to take place. By 1922, Lenin was the
ruler Russia, He also eventually Russia into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or the USSR. He died on January 21, 1924 due to a series of
strokes that would eventually kill him. He was followed by a man known as Joseph Stalin; the bloodiest man of WWII who would make Hitler
look like a playground bully. Joseph Stalin born into a Osif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili. He was born into an abusive family, and later left to
study at the Tiflis Theological Seminary. He Later left to become a fellow Marxist revolutionist. He was exiled six times into Siberia and six times
which he escaped due his contributions in being a Bolshevik revolutionist. He often led strikes and riots against local authorities. He became one of
the Bolshevik's key contributors, and rose to power by taking out who was above him. Lenin before he died saw Stalin as a threat and proposed to
remove him of power, a proposal which was denied. Stalin along the way of becoming this brute, he changed him name to Stalin, or "Steel–one"
followed by the "lin" referring to

Write An Essay On The Gulag History
The Gulag was an enormous system of labor camps which was once dispersed over the Soviet Union.The word "GULAG" means "Main Camp
Administration", the institution which ran the Soviet camps. In other words, it is specified as punishment camps or labor camps. The camps
operated from the 1930s until the 1950s. The first was formed in 1918. There were an estimated 14 million people who held in the Gulag labor
camps from 1929 to 1953 with a total of around from 1934 to 1953. Most Gulag prisoners were not political prisoners. Petty crimes and jokes directed
at the Soviet government and officials were condemned by incarceration. Many of the prisoners in the Gulag camps were incarcerated without a trial
and were immediately sent to Gulags without hesitation; The Gulag was diminished in size following Stalin's death in 1953, in a period known as the
'Khrushchev Thaw.' Joseph Stalin was the "General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union." The Gulag
system was prefaced to separate and eliminate people whose deeds and thoughts were not contributing to the dictatorships power of the proletariat....
Unlike Concentration camps, the Gulag held their prisoners and freed them after a specified time depending on why they were sent there. There
numerous Gulag camps that covered the Soviet Union much worse than others. There were three main types of Gulag camps. 1. Prisoners were able to
move within the camp zone, but could not leave the zone. If they were caught beyond the 'prisoner zone' they were automatically shot. That was the
typical Gulag camp. The second type was much stricter. It consisted of no windows locked barracks and restricted movement within the camp. That
was most probably the harshest one out of them

Essay on China
China
The history of China is embeded with revolution and tension dating back to the feudal periods and the " first unified Chinese empire under Qi Shi Huang
Di in 221 B.C. " The Confucianism ideology entrenched in the minds of the
Chinese people with its conservative base and the need to achieve harmony in society has yet to be reached and most likely, never will. The proletariat
is at the heart of the Marxist–Maoist approach to politics and the basic way of life for the Chinese masses considering that "...roughly 85% of the
population is based in peasantry..." While Marxism, as implemented by the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) and Nationalism have historically hindered the people of
China; a growing need to conform to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Chinese Communist Party was by no means a military power and it was unable to sustain itself and flourish in the Nationalist–controlled cities. The
Kuomintang, a nationalist party was set out to unify China under one central government. The KMT had in its possession adequate means to quash
the idealistic CCP and did so on a number of occasions. Some of which led to rebellions such as the Long March led by Mao Tse–tung.
China, over history has experienced phases of both Nationalism and
Sinocentrism, both of which can be damaging to a developing country attempting to compete economically in the global market. These ideas can relate
back to the ancient religion of confucianism. " Confucianism has been instramental in the shaping of China's leadership. Not only does it emphasize a
rigid hierarchy kept in place by virtuous behavior. But it also holds that strict adherence to proper behavior actually leads to correct thinking. "
Accompanying Nationalism and Sinocentrism was rebellion and unrest. Twenty–four historic dynasties followed a common pattern of development. At
the beginning of a new dynasty, a period of national unity under virtuous and benevolent rule flourished and usually was accompanied by intellectual
excitement. A

Socialism
I think this has gotten way off track. Let's go back to square one for just a moment. You responded to this video which was regarding anarchism and it
went into details about tactics. Your criticism was that what was offered was a bureaucratic state which offers nothing to the workers. That is a
strawman argument unless you can demonstrate when and where the finnishbolshevik advocates for such a thing. Regardless of that though, it's kind
of beside the point. The state is something that arises naturally given our current material conditions in this stage of history, and that entails bureacracy
in some form or another whether or not you like it. I absolutely welcome people to discuss how that should be managed in the future in order to... Show
Clearly, you're contradicting and deviating from your original argument that no rights (social or political) were had by the soviet people. If you
believed your original argument was sufficient enough you would have stuck to your guns and not changed your tune. And it is a fact that before
the USSR, Russia was a backward country in which most of its citizens couldn't even read. Within a few decades it became a super power on par
with the United States. That is quite a feat, and did all of that while providing the things I mentioned. You did, and your original point should be
tossed out because it is an indefensible one. A piece of advice: In the future, it would demonstrate more intellectual honesty not to use hyperbole to
sell a narrative. That might make you look good to those who already hang on your every word and follow your every lead, but it's not actually
conducive to good argumentative practices. "I think there is a difference between bureacratic tasks which are a part of any complex organization
and the monopoly of political power by a strata which performs those tasks." Firstly, I don't know about you, but I consider a debate a cooperative
process even in the case that two people who are ideologically opposed, and in that spirit I think a certain degree of transparency should be a given. I
prefaced that the question I posed previously was a yes or no question and to

Marx 's Theory On Class Conflict And Society Essay
Since the french and industrial revolution in 18 century, the world had come to a new era: capitalist society. Capitalism represents a big step
forward in human productive abilities compared with previous forms of society. Along with the social development, there was a new group of
people who was called the sociologist who analyze and try to understand how this society works. Marx was one of them and his ideas were
influential. His theory mostly emphasis on class conflict and the society from economic aspects. This essay will first analyze Marx's theory in detail.
Then I will explain how economy and social conflict related to Marx's theory along with the role of these factors in the capitalist society.
Marx defined social class as the class which sets the scene and moves things forward. He sometimes talked about there are only two classes:
Bourgeoisie and proletariat, the class–in–itself and the class–for–itself, sometimes talked about there are many numbers of classes such as capitalist,
working class and landowner. "There is no simple unambiguous, and universally accepted body of Marxist doctrine." As Bob Jessop said, the
thoughts of Marx in his life time were various and far–ranging. In general, Marx refers bourgeoisies as capitalists and they are major class in that
period leading into industrialization. And he thinks the petty bourgeoisie as middle classes who cannot see themselves as part of class, only as
individual. The last one, the proletariat, was described by

The Communist Manifesto Marx And Engels

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from April Ford

More from April Ford (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Communist Manifesto Marx And Engels