Economic Systems Essay

Economic Systems Essay
Introduction
Economic systems are organized way in which a state or nation allocates its resources and
apportions goods and services in the national community. An economic system is slackly defined as
country's plan for its services, goods produced, and the exact way in which its economic plan is
carried out. There are three types of economic systems exist, they are command economy, market
economy, and mixed economy. Command economy is also sometimes called planned economy. The
expectations of this type of economy is that all major decisions that related to the construction or
production, distribution, commodity and service prices are all made by the government. However, in
market economy, national and state governments play a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Businesses can decide which goods to produce and in what quantity and consumers can decide what
they want to purchase and at what price. The role of the state is limited to ensure right precision in
the prices charged by the sellers. Prices also have the function to allocate and distribute a country's
resources. Market leads to complete effectiveness bringing about the best possible distribution of a
country's resources in a perfect world. This would only happen in a state of equilibrium and there is
a unique price for every commodity. But in a realistic world which is imperfect by nature, prices are
never at equilibrium and very unstable depending upon the vagaries of the market forces. This
generally harms people living below the poverty line. It is impossible for them to pay high prices in
cases of demand shortage. Thus, the free market model is not a viable option in developing
countries which has a large number of poor. Besides, producers are aim to minimize profit and
maximize rent of production. Examples of countries that are using this economy system are Hong
Kong, USA, and UK. Many developing countries like India and China are moving towards totally
free–market economy. The command economy is government directed. The market forces have very
little say in such an economy. There is no private property. On the other hand, a command economy
aims at using all available resources for developing either
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

China
INTRODUCTION
China is the world second biggest economy in the world; this result was achieved in the last 30
years as its economy has been growing in average 10% annually (According to International
Monetary Fund). This uncommon economics performance compels economists all around the world
to ask them selves is a democracy an only system of government which guarantee sustainable
growth and development of an economy?
Though some economists believe that democracy, as the most common type of capitalism, is the
most "healthful" and useful economics and government system, China is a socialist country.
Socialism – "Compare capitalism an economic theory or system in which the means of production,
distribution, and exchange are owned by the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to this there are no demerit goods and public goods are produced in the required amount. But,
as the government controls everything there is lack of motivation and innovation, as producers don't
have any reasons to minimize their costs of production, because they won't get any profit from
these.
A free market economy and a command economy have their own advantages and disadvantages,
however, currently China is in a Transition process; it is switching from Command economy to free
market. So it might combine all benefits of both systems and due to this expose a unique rate of
growth of the economy.
According to Sai Ding and John Knight report about China's growth this process has been divided
into 3 stages. First stage of this reform occurred in the period from 1978 to 1984, it was focused on
the rural areas: farming households received permission for long–term collective ownership of the
land and non–farming firms were also allowed. This lead to an increase in the investment's level and
a decrease of the savings as investors had discovered a new opportunity for earning profit. An
increasing in Investments lead to an increase in the Gross Domestic Product as they are part of
aggregated demand.
GDP=AD= Consumption + Investments + Gov.Spending + Export – Import
During second stage of the reforms (1985–92) most of the changes were focused on the urban
economy, especially on state–owned

Differences among Nations:Compared and Contrasted Essay
There are many aspects that affect the way in social, culture, economic, legal and political
conditions can greatly affect the way globalized businesses are managed. Doing business abroad
presents enormous challenges simply because countries and societies are so incredibly different.
There is a need to appreciate not only that these differences exist, but also to appreciate how these
differences impact doing business abroad. Doing business abroad requires flexibility to conform to
the value systems and norms of that country. Adaptation can embrace all aspects of an international
business's operations in a foreign country, from the way deals are negotiated, to the appropriate
incentive pay systems, to the organization structure, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Where possible it is necessary to provide written materials and/or copies of presentations. During a
verbal presentation, it may be advisable to repeat key points for emphasis, and in almost all cases to
have a professional interpreter. Another major difference in the social etiquette pertaining to
business between The Netherlands and Mexico is the way business appointments and meetings are
handled. Business appointments are required and visitors are expected to be punctual, it is
considered rude and frowned upon heavily to do so otherwise in The Netherlands. In Mexico,
however, be prepared to wait for your appointment beyond the scheduled time. Mexicans often
schedule business appointments during siesta time (between 2 and 5 pm), when they will be at lunch
or off–duty. They may also schedule several appointments at the same time, knowing that many
people will not show up. (Gottlieb, 2003). These differences can cause major communication
problems while trying to conduct business. These are just a couple, among countless other reasons
why it is so important to be aware and become acquainted with the social differences in the country
that you are going to be doing business with. We have a great need to understand the cultural
differences among nations. Cultural differences can affect the success or failure of an international
company in a number of important ways. In studies of international business negotiations between
Americans, on the one

China Reform
I"It matters not whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice." Deng Xiaoping
Paper
DENG XIAOPING : The chinese reform
Elmahdi Fathi : 2014–81611
China has always been renowned for being successful in the domains of science and arts, however
in previous decades, China has been ravaged by famines, civil discomfort and foreign outsourcing.
China was consumed by this injustice until well after the Second World War when Mao Zedong
introduced Communism adapted from the U.S.S.R, and created an autocratic socialist system which
imposes firm constraints upon the Chinese social, political and economic system. It wasn't until the
1980's China's following leader Deng Xiaoping who focused focused on developing China into a ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With the 'open door' policy, China boosted the publications and entertainment of all kinds. New
brands of clothing appeared in China. a number of
privateowned restaurants and roadside vendors increased along with the appearance of disco in
big cities. These new changes in the Chinese society showed that it was a sign of change for the bet
ter, and the Chinese economy kept on growing.
What social, cultural and political impacts has the economic development produced? With the
growth of the economic development, there were some impacts that it produced that affected the
social, cultural and political. As China opened its door for foreign investors to invest in China and to
trade with China, a lot of officials found opportunities to enrich themselves and their friends in the
changed of economic. embezzling state property, smuggling Western–made products, and taking
bribes were major issues in the Chinese government. As China's economy started growing, large and
small–scale corruption continued at faster pace. Not only corruptions of the officials, but there was
also other crimes such as prostitution and drug trafficking also reemerged along with the economic
reforms. Even though the people at that time knew that the punishment could be death penalty, but
they were still willing to take the risks because the profits of these illegal activities were very high.
But as the China's economy rose, people expected to have a better life. So

Capitalism And Socialism
Do two wrongs actually make a right? In the case of creating a perfect economy, that is true. Pure
capitalism and socialism both have many flaws, but when they mix together you have an almost
perfect economic system. In a pure capitalist society, there would be no ceiling and no floor. 98% on
the citizens are in the middle but the the 1%'s are 100 times more rich than the rest or 100 times
more poor. If you are disabled or old, the government would not help you more than someone
having everything going their way. A pure socialist society is the exact opposite. Everyone would
get the same luxuries, necessities, and money given. Even if one man works 12 hours a day and the
other works 12 hours a week, they will be treated with the same respect ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the case of making a perfect economy, two wrongs do make a right. Capitalism and Socialism are
like peanut and jelly, they are good but have flaws by themselves but are perfect together. Ethan
Ritz Jr. is a businessman, he makes very risk decision that either make him rich or poor. He only
does this because he lives in a society with a mixed economy. He knows the government won't stop
him from becoming a billionaire but also knows that they will provide him with social security if he
becomes poor. Furthermore his father Ethan Ritz Sr. has social security help him stay in a
financially balanced place. David Bernstein is an old man, he retired 10 years ago and is 75 years
old. He is very grateful to live in a mixed economy because he has social security help him stay
financially stable. David's grandson, Bob, also loves living in a mixed economy because he doesn't
have tax away all his money. Bob loves the idea of capitalism, but wants socialism ways in his
economy because his grandfather cannot work anymore.
Capitalism and socialism by themselves may not be capable of having a successful society, but
when put together they create an almost perfect economy. Pure socialist and capitalist societies are
both doomed to fail but a mixed which is mostly capitalist and has some socialist aspects meshed
into it is perfect.My argument is valid because all countries should decide to become mixed instead
of dealing with the flaws of pure economies. Capitalism and socialism have their pros and cons, but
a mixed economy eliminates the cons of pure economies and keeps the

Command Vs Command System Analysis
A state chooses its economic system by answering three important questions: what goods need to be
produced, how will they be produced, and who are they being produced for? The two main
economic structures used in the world today are command and market systems. In a command
system, everything relating to the economy, such as production, employment, and wages, is
controlled by a central planning authority in the government. The government decides what goods
will be produced, how they will be priced, and who they will be distributed to. Command
economies are designed to benefit the entire population rather than the individual consumer. On the
other end of the spectrum is the market economy; government interference is kept to a minimum in
this

Capitalism Vs. Socialism And Socialism
Capitalism vs Socialism Capitalism and socialism have been two school of thoughts in economics
that have opposing factors, and there have been a lot of criticisms and comparison on which
economy is better in terms of economic equality, and the role that the government plays in the
society. In most situations, a society with a better economic opportunities and choices, with more
technological advancement and private owned businesses would be a better option to a society that
is collectively owned, and operated by all members of a society. While the socialist believe that
economic inequality is inappropriate for a society, and the government playing the role of providing
"free education, subsidized health care for the elderly, and higher taxes on the rich", the capitalist
believe the government; a socialist economy lacks the effective use of economic resources, therefore
providing a system of government that provides individual rights, objective laws, and a free market
economy would be more efficient. In a capitalist economy, an individual is allowed to own a
property, and have the freedom to organize and operate for profit purpose; emphasis on individual
profit rather than on workers or the society as a whole, therefore encouraging firms to be more
efficient and innovate new products that acknowledges the interest of the people without the
interference by the government or any regulation necessary to protect public interest, and at the
same time, keeping the national

The State Hampering Of A Capitalist Economy Essay
The state hampering with a capitalist economy can have positive and negative to society. Theorist
such as Hayek was against state intervention and believed in the neoliberalist movement, which
meant that firms would are able to privatize their businesses and still trade in free markets. Hayek
identifies that capital theory "was an area where he found that the coordinating processes of the
market were underappreciated" and that the "evolved institutions and market competition as
irreplaceable means for social coordination" (White, 1999, pg. 753–4). Despite Hayek's claims of
state intervention, it has been proved that the state hampering in a capitalist economy has brought
positive effects. For example, mixed markets such as Sweden have 52% government spending
shares, and 48% privatized firms in the market. Conversely, without the state intervening in the
market, this could also lead to negative effects in the economy by monopolies being created by
privatized firms, which leads to market inequality, diminish the marginal utility of wealth and social
benefits will be ignored. The government only intervenes in areas such as regulation and spending
money on public services and amenities; which is why some economies have been able to strive and
grow. Government intervention could be viewed as an essential element to regulate the economy,
but over the past decades, we have seen that it is not the case. Adam Smith a classical liberal
proposed the idea of Laissez Faire, which

Economic Policies: Adam Smith Vs. Karl Marx
Many of Canada's current economic policies are based upon ideas proposed by Adam Smith and
Karl Marx. Although the two have opposing ideologies, combining their ideologies has proven to
create an effective mixed market economy. Canada's mixed market economy would satisfy Adam
Smith more than Karl Marx due to the decisions made regarding production, price determination,
and private ownership of resources.
What, how, and for whom to produce are fundamental economic questions that are answered in
opposing ways by Smith's capitalist view versus Marx's socialist view. In capitalism, primarily
goods that will sell for the highest profit are produced, whereas in socialism, primarily goods that
will benefit society are produced. Goods are produced ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A key example is Canada's unregulated gasoline and fuel oil prices. In Ottawa, has dropped 15 cents
per litre from between November 2015 to February 2016 according to Statistics Canada (2016). This
is due to an "oil glut", as the supply of crude oil is rising rapidly around the world (Krauss, 2016).
Although the demand also increased, the supply increased faster, resulting in a decrease of the
equilibrium price. This drop clearly illustrated Smith's claim that short–run prices and long term
equilibrium is determined by supply and demand. In recent months, oil prices have dropped below
what is profitable for oil–sands project such as Kearl Phase 1, whose break even price was US$42
per barrel (Hussain, 2015a) while oil prices were at US$32.19 (Investing.com Canada, 2016), both
as of 22 January 2015. This has resulted in approximately 100 000 layoffs in 2015 in the oil and gas
sector (Hussain, 2015b), and perhaps a decrease in the wages of workers as well. Marx would not be
happy with this at all, as it implies that workers are not being compensated adequately for the labour
they provide. If Marx's view on price determination were to be adopted in Canada, foreign oil and
gas producers would simply outcompete domestic producers, and it would result in more layoffs
than the current situation. This would also lose the confidence of investors, leading to less
investment and even more financial trouble for the oil companies. Smith's free market price
determination is not perfect, but Marx's system is ill–suited for the oil industry along with many
others in

Business Ethics vs. Capitalism Essay
The concept of business ethics has tried to change the way businesses operate over the years.
Business ethics is a form of ethics that governs the actions of businesses to circumvent the affects
business has on every day society. But some question its effectiveness in the application of
capitalism. Several case studies have shown that this is the case; many companies place the pursuit
of money in front of the pursuit of virtue. Although, the majority of companies are not in the
spotlight of acting unethically, can we conclude that they follow the ethical norms? It is natural for
normal human beings to act ethical but businesses are on a completely different playing field. But
could business ethics be clearly possible in capitalism? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Businesses will compete with each other giving consumers the advantage and therefore help the
economy profit. Friedman believes that capitalism the economy will take care of itself and any
outside forces would disrupt its process. In capitalism the worker is a commodity in so as to produce
the products needed for the market. Each individual does what they are best at producing and if
everyone does this then each person's needs are taken care of. When each person is working they are
paid money for their labor. With this money they can buy goods, which can fulfill their own desires,
and so the trading of money for goods can take place in a capitalist market driving the economy
forward (Smith 158). Capitalism depends on a free economy but does business ethics shake the very
structure of a free economy? Some critics agree that business ethics infringe on the right of a free
capitalist economy but others say that businesses are not following their social responsibility and so
there should be a place for business ethics in a capitalist economy. But what kinds of ethics would
be applicable to a free market economy such as capitalism? In business ethics there are several
different types of ethical behavior that exist. Although there are many different kinds of ethical
behavior, three are the most prevalent within society; these are utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue
ethics. In Utilitarianism ethical

The Mixed Economic System In The United States
All countries around the world have some form of economic system that is there to provide a basis
on which their economies can grow and prosper. Current economic systems are based on growth to
remain stable to be successful. Sustainable economies are when the output is steady over the long
term but may change in the short term an economic system that does not promote growth is going to
collapse. In economics capitalism and socialism influence views on how the economy should be
managed. Capitalist argue that the economy should encourage innovation and freedom to provide
people with the highest standard of living possible, and socialist argue that the economy should
provide a degree of equality so the pie is evenly split and everything is fair. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Economic policies are there to ensure that the economy will remain stable in the future and also
ensure that everything is being run fair and everyone is getting equal opportunity. Mixed economies
can enact policies that benefit both the consumer and business. In a mixed economy the government
and market work together to determine the best policies for future long term stability and growth.
During a recession in a mixed economy the government will put more money and resources into the
public sector, such as repairing roads, building schools and hospitals and create more jobs. The
government will also lower taxes so consumers have more money to spend.
(http://econsguide.blogspot.ca/, 2009). Private sectors main interest is to make a profit and not the
state of the economy such as inflation and unemployment is not their concern although they
contribute to it. (http://econsguide.blogspot.ca/, 2009). The government acts as a referee carefully
enacting policies that benefit the greater good and improve the economic stability. In times of slow
growth and recession the government can take control and regulate the economy to prevent further
slow growth and bring the economy back to a stable state. At the same time corporations are free to
manage their own business provided they agree to the rules and laws set by the government. A
mixed economy has more

The Enigma Of Capital And The Crisis Of Capitalism
A Critical Review of David Harvey's The Enigma of Capital and the Crisis of Capitalism Sudheer
Vemuru
Economics 490
10 November, 2014
In writing this paper, I have abided by the Honor Code at UNC–Chapel Hill.
Signature:____________________ ______________________

The Enigma of Capital and the Crisis of Capitalism is a forum for author David Harvey to voice his
concerns on the contemporary global capitalist model. As a Marxist geographer and anthropologist,
Harvey analyzes modern capitalism through a lens of skepticism that results in a scathing
renunciation of the capitalist goals of perpetual accumulation and creative destruction. Harvey
argues that in a world constrained by scarce resources and burgeoning social barriers, the capitalist
process produces a strange dynamic that oscillates between periods of crisis and boom (40). In the
end the capitalist may be able to hedge against her losses, but the vast majority of the population
will wallow in the doldrums, enslaved by the power of capital and unable to pull themselves up by
their bootstraps. Such is the extent of the problem we face in the wake of the Great Recession. The
economy continues to grow modestly, while median household income shrinks (Noss 2). The
capitalists are reloading once again at the expense of Main Street. As Harvey points out, there is a
great need to reevaluate of our views of modern capitalism. The Enigma of Capital is just a starting
point.
Harvey begins his analysis of capitalism with a

Egypt And The Corporatist System
Corporatism has often been called a "third way" or a "mixed economy", it's perceived as a
combination of socialism and capitalism, but in reality it's a separate unique political economic
system. Although many of us are not acquainted with the "corporatism", most of the world
economies are corporatists. A corporatist system is a system where the society and the economy are
structured into main interest groups whose representatives settle problems through "negotiation" and
"joint agreement". Corporatist system works through collective bargaining and certain key groups
are closely integrated into the formal political process. Corporatism has its roots back then in the
nineteenth century Roman Catholic social thought as well as in German romanticism and idealism.
It first appeared in Europe as a response to the social ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These are evidence that corporatist system exists in Egypt. Taking Ezz Steel as an example, we can
see that Ahmed Ezz was a political figure as well as a businessman. Ahmed Ezz held high ranking
political positions and was one of the richest businessmen in Egypt. Ezz steel controlled the steel
market in Egypt. "Allegations of corruption, monopolistic practices and illegal obtaining of licenses
had surfaced for years around Ezzsteel"(Ammous) and the government was passive about it. The
government was "politically influenced" to clear Ezz's name from all the wrongdoing. Ezz took over
Alexandria Iron and Steel Company Dekhila (AISCD) which was established in 1982 and owned by
state banks and petroleum companies. AISCD used to be the biggest steel producer. Gradually,
through political connections and loans, Ezz was able to transform (AISCD) from statist control to
his ownership(Ammous). This is a good example to show how Egypt moved from socialism to
corporatism. Ezz also benefitted government initiatives and laws which is a clear evidence of

Command Economy Vs. Command Economies
A market economy is an economy in which decisions regarding investment production and
distribution are based on supply and demand, and prices of goods and services are determined in a
free price system. (Alvather, 1993) Market economies may be practical, but they also rest upon the
fundamental principle of individual freedom: freedom as a consumer to choose among competing
products and services; freedom as a producer to start or expand a business and share its risks and
rewards; freedom as a worker to choose a job or career, join a labor union, or change employers.
Market economies are not without their inequities and misuses. A number of them genuine, however
it is likewise verifiable that cutting edge private endeavor and entrepreneurial soul, coupled with
political vote based system, offers the best prospect for safeguarding flexibility and giving the most
extensive streets to investment development and success for all. (Davis, 2009) A command economy
is a system where the government, rather than the free market, determines what goods should be
produced, how much should be produced and the price at which the goods will be offered for sale.
The command economy is a key feature of any communist society. Command economy also known
as are not able to proficiently allot merchandise on account of the learning issue that the focal
organizer 's powerlessness to observe how much of a good ought to be delivered. Shortages and
surpluses are a common consequence of command economies.

Why Capitalism Is Bad?
Why Argue Capitalist Values? The main goal of capitalism is to create profit. Capitalism values
private ownership of property and discourages government intervention in the economy. Cultural
misconceptions have suggested that capitalism is bad because it has lead to a large separation of
wealth from the wealthiest individuals in a nation. The separation of wealth is not a misconception
but I believe that blaming capitalism and wealthy individuals for societies economic woes are. I also
do not believe that socialism is a bad thing either. I believe that both capitalism and socialism have a
place amongst our society however I would lean towards capitalism because of an emphasis on
utilizing resources to create more consumer goods where as socialism emphasizes evenly
distributing resources. The government cannot detect consumer preferences, shortages, and
surpluses accurately and cannot efficiently co–ordinate production. Economists Ludwig von Mises
and Friedrich Hayek have both referred to this as the "economic calculation problem." Market
system and a free economy are used to solve this problem. Some economists say Adam Smith best
describes the principle of supply and demand in his book Wealth of Nations, "When the quantity of
any commodity which is brought to market falls short of the effectual demand, all those who are
willing to pay... cannot be supplied with the quantity which they want... Some of them will be
willing to give more. A competition will begin among them,

Socialist Command Economy
An economy could be considered the blood of a nation's body; as everything flows smoothly, the
body performs its functions properly. Two major types of economy in the world today are capitalist
market economies and socialist command economies. Under a market economy, the people are
granted the rights to free enterprise and build the economy through private business; they can create
and trade products and services as they wish. Within a command economy, the government controls
the land and capital and makes all the decisions involving economic issues. Both of these economies
share some goals, but are also quite different in how each functions and each possess their own
share of advantages and disadvantages. Command economies and market economies, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Within the command economy system, the government has control and/or ownership of all the
available land and capital.. This may seem like a negative point, but the command system does have
some advantages. The economy, under this system, is capable of changing rapidly over a brief
period of time. People know what they are going to do for work; there is little room for uncertainty
about what someone will do with their lives. Under this economy, equality is a high priority;
everyone has similar amounts and forms of wealth and lifestyles. Public services such as defense,
education, and health care cost almost nothing because the government provides them to keep
equality and make sure the services are available to everyone. However, there are some problems
with this economic system. One is the fact that the work done to achieve equality does not always
meet the needs and wants of the consumers. Another is that the quality of products is not always the
best because there is no competition or incentive to try to become better. Individuality pushed so far
that it is almost nonexistent. Also, a large bureaucracy is required to run the system, which means
that even though major changes in the economy can be made very quickly, small, day–to–day
changes are often neglected. A command economy can be effective in achieving equality, but it also
limits the people. Market economies and command economies may have some small similarities,
but they do have myriad differences. One economy focuses chance and individual freedom; the
other, equality and certainty. Each one functions differently, and the situation of the nation's
economy balanced with either system's advantages and disadvantages will determine which one will
work the best for the

Planned Market And Mixed Market Economies
Planned, Market, and Mixed Economies
Each country has its own economic system, a "system for allocating its resources among its citizens,
both individual and organizations" (Ebert & Griffin, 2015, p. 11). There are three economic systems:
planned economies, market economies, and mixed market economies. Economic systems are
defined by how the five factors of productions are handled: labor, capital, entrepreneurs, physical
resources, and information resources. Factors of production are "the resources that a country's
businesses use to produce goods and services" (Ebert & Griffin, 2015, p. 11).
Planned Economies
A planned economy can be defined as an "economy that relies on a centralized government to
control all or most factors of production and to make all or most production and allocation
decisions" (Ebert & Griffin, 2015, p. 12). There are two forms of planned economies: communism,
in which the government owns and operates all factors of productions, and socialism, where the
government owns and operates only selected factors of productions. China and North Korea are
both examples of current communist countries; Denmark and Sweden are both examples of current
socialist countries.
Planned Economies and Labor Factor of Production
"People who work for businesses provide labor. Labor, sometimes called human resources, includes
the physical and intellectual contributions people make while engaging in economic productions"
(Ebert & Griffin, 2015, p. 11). In a communist planned

Healthcare Affecting China's Free Market
Healthcare does not only affect the United States' free market but also affects China's command
market and Australia's strict market. Healthcare is essential around the world, as it provides jobs for
many and serves to help and save people. Hospitals, in particular, provide jobs to doctors, nurses,
machine companies, and even insurance companies. There are many economies around the world
and most economies have the same basic procedures when it comes to healthcare although there are
some major differences between them. "China's economy is subject to market forces, and capitalists
are involved, but the Party does not believe that capitalists run their economy"(Macrohistory and
world timeline). With a population of over 1.3 billion China has received much attention, including
its spectacular economic development since 1978 and the accompanied deterioration of health care
for a substantial segment of its large rural population. "China's healthcare system is best described
as inconsistent"(Edoardo Maria Nofri). With rural and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Web. 26 Apr. 2017. "China's Socialist Market Economy." China's "Socialist Market Economy" Web.
26 Apr. 2017. "The Chinese Healthcare System: How It Works And Future Trends." Alberto
Forchielli. 07 Jan. 2016. Web. 26 Apr. 2017. Daemmrich, Arthur. "The Political Economy of
Healthcare Reform in China: Negotiating Public and Private." SpringerPlus. Springer International
Publishing, 2013. Web. 26 Apr. 2017. Daemmrich, Arthur. "The Political Economy of Healthcare
Reform in China: Negotiating Public and Private." SpringerPlus. Springer International Publishing,
2013. Web. 26 Apr. 2017. Harrah, Scott. "Health Care Around the World: Why Australia Is #1." The
UMHS Endeavour. 31 Mar. 2016. Web. 26 Apr. 2017. Hays, Jeffrey. "HEALTH CARE IN
CHINA––DOCTORS, INSURANCE AND COSTS." Facts and Details. Web. 26 Apr. 2017. "Health
Care System and Health Policy in Australia." The Commonwealth Fund. Web. 26 Apr.

Equilibrium Without Intervention : America And The Free...
Equilibrium without Intervention Rebecca Dannay America and the Free Market Professor Shaanan
April 7, 2016 Table of Contents Introduction of American Economy
............................................................3 o Free Market System
......................................................................3 o Problem with American Economy
.....................................................4 Government Intervention
.........................................................................5 o 2008 Bailouts
..............................................................................6 o Large Corporations
.......................................................................7 Analysis
...............................................................................................8 Conclusion
.........................................................................................10 Bibliography
.......................................................................................11 Equilibrium without Intervention America
is believed to have a Free Market Economic System which other countries have aspired to follow. A
market economy can be defined as where supply and demand drive and regulate the economy
instead of government intervention. Also, we are seen as having a laissez–faire economy, which is
"a capitalist society where the profit motive is given free rein and the pursuit of economic success is
the top priority" (Shaanan). But how can America have a Free Market system if it has a laissez–faire
economy? The difference between free market and capitalist market is; under a capitalist system,
businesses are supporters of free market principles for themselves and government intervention for
their competitors. To have a Free Market economy, it is assumed to possess three things: free flow
of information, no barriers to competition, and direct responsibility.

Economic Markets And State Governments Share An...
Do economic markets and state governments share an adversarial or symbiotic relationship?
Scholars of International Political Economics have been at odds over what role, if any, the state
should have in the International Economy. Despite such disagreements, most scholars can concur
that IPE is ultimately concerned with the ways in which states shape the systems through which
economic interactions are expressed, and conversely the results that economic interactions
(including the power of collective markets and individuals acting both within and outside them)
have upon political structures and outcomes. The relation between states and markets in the
international scene, and whether, the relationship at home affects relationships abroad, is of great
importance. One contemporary in particular Ian Bremmer has attempted to explain this relationship
in light of the latest economic recession, and what impact the state should have in the future. In his
book titled The End of the Free Market Bremmer believes that the Free Market Capitalism which
has been a staple of American Economic prosperity is still the system that will provide for
innovation and the free flow of ideas, information, people, money, goods, and services
(Bremmer,183–184). Countries like China, Russia, Brazil, Mexico, and regions like Southeast Asia
and Africa have all converted from command economies to a degree into state capitalist countries.
These countries have all experienced the positives of the free market

The Balcerowicz Plan
organization essentially split in two: Solidarity continued its existence as the union, but it also
established a new political wing, Citizens' Committee Solidarity, that would nominate delegates in
the elections (Klein 219). It took part in the elections of 1989 and won 99 percent of all the Senate
seats, thus attesting to the party's overwhelming popularity among the Polish electorate (Walicki
114). Tadeusz Mazoviecki, a Solidarity leader and political dissident who was imprisoned during the
martial law period, was elected as the first non–communist prime minister since the advent of the
People's Republic of Poland. As a Solidarity candidate, Wałęsa participated in the first democratic
presidential elections and won the presidency in 1990. In the same year, Balcerowicz, a recently–
appointed Deputy Prime Minister with long–lasting ties to Solidarity, announced a radical reform
program that came to be known as the Balcerowicz Plan. It consisted of a shock–therapy reform
package, which the new Polish government officially ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Likewise, it failed to outline concrete goals for the future and, as neoliberals were quick to point,
espoused perilous utopian sentiments. By contrast, the neoliberal position had the advantage of
modeling itself on the successes of Western free market economies. For this reason, it promoted
itself as aspiring towards concrete and realistic goals. Furthermore, neoliberals enjoyed a rhetorical
advantage over the proponents of the third way approach since the former relied on a binary
thinking that pitted the new vision of market reform against the old vision of failed socialist
planning. On the contrary, those on the Left who continued to espouse egalitarian and collectivist
ideas appeared to be compromised by their association with the marred legacy of the old socialist
system (Bohle and Neunhöffer

The Voice
The term socialist has been thrown around quite a bit in the past few years. Not since the cold war
has the term garnered so much attention in the press and from politicians. But when you look at
countries who actually have a socialist economic structure, you can see some similarities to the
United States – but there are some really stark differences. Below, you will see some of the most
socialistic nations in the world today: China Denmark Finland Netherlands Canada Sweden Norway
Ireland New Zealand Belgium Despite popular myths, there is very little connection between
economic performance and welfare expenditure. Many of the countries on this list are proof of that,
such as Denmark and Finland. Even though both countries are ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The most realistic way to devise a list of Socialist countries is to base it upon which nations have
substantial amounts of state–run industry, numerous govt. social programs, or other traits which
make them actually Socialist. The following is a list of such countries with reasons for including
them. Keep in mind that this information is as of 2006, some countries may eventually need to be
added or removed from the list. Cuba: Cuba is one of the most Socialist nations, as it has a mostly
state–run economy, universal healthcare, government–paid education at all levels, and a number of
of social programs. It does not have a stock exchange. North Korea: The same is true of North
Korea, which has an almost entirely state–run economy, as well as the same social programs
mentioned for Cuba. Like Cuba, North Korea does not have a stock exchange. Venezuela: Economy
has more private ownership, but the government social programs are quite extensive and the foreign
policy is very left–wing. Cuban doctors and teachers have been brought to Venezuela to provide
some medical and educational services. China: A substantial part of the economy is still state–run,
although there are not as many social programs as there once were and universal healthcare has been
eliminated. Still has a Socialist–type foreign policy, for the most part. Vietnam: A significant part of
the economy is state–run. Close ties with Cuba, Venezuela,

Fin 515 Week 1 Homework Minicase
Kimberly Pulda
Mini Case A. Corporate finance is important to all managers because it helps identify the goals of
the company. These goals are: a. Identifying b. Creating c. Delivering highly valued products and
services to customers
The goals require the three attributes which are first, successful companies have skilled people at all
levels inside the company. Second, successful companies have a strong relationship outside the
company. Third, successful companies have enough funding to execute their plans and support their
operations.
The skills provided are to identify and select the corporate strategies and individual projects that add
value to their firm and also to forecast the funding requirements of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
G. Weighted average cost of capital is the average rate of return required by all of the company's
investors. H. They interact with intrinsic value which is the sum of all the future expected free cash
flows when converted into today's dollars. m. FCF has sales revenue to operating costs to required
investments in operating capital n. WACC has market interest rates and market risk aversion, firms
debt/equity mix and firm's business risk which all go to cost of debt and cost of equity which both
areas end up at the value. I. o. The providers and users of capital are x. households: net savers, xi.
non–financial corporations: net users xii. governments: U.S. governments are net borrowers, some
foreign governments are net savers xiii. financial corporations: slightly net borrows, but almost
breakeven p. Capital is transferred between savers and borrows by xiv. Direct transfer xv. Through
an investment banking house xvi. Through a financial intermediary J. The price that a borrower
must pay for debt capital is called interest.
The price of equity capital is called required return
The four most fundamental factors that affect the cost of money are 1. Production opportunities 2.
Time preferences for consumption 3. Risk 4. Expected inflation K. Some

business q@a Essay example
Chapter Two Economics: The Framework for Business Review Questions 1. How did the global
economic crisis unfold? In 2008 the banking system was on the verge of collapsing. Home
foreclosures soared, due to home and personal loans not being paid off. Property and the housing
marketing plummeted. Layoffs put more than a million Americans out of work 2. What steps did the
Federal government and the Federal Reserve take to mitigate the crisis? The Federal Reserve
stepped in and bailout out AIG Congress passed the Troubled Assets Relief Program The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed by Congress Treasury Department spent money on an
auto industry 3. Compare and contrast microeconomics and macroeconomics. ... Show more content
Describe the 4 degrees of competition within the free market system. Offer 2 to 3 examples of each
type of competition. Degree of competition Examples Pure Competition The seller has the option to
accept any price for the product, regardless of the generally accepted price. Monopolistic
Competition Identical products are sold, but brand loyalty is created so the consumer will keep on
buying the product. Oligopoly The petroleum and telecommunication markets, the automobile
industry, and the bank system Monopoly Say if Comcast was the only cable television provider in
your area. If you want cable, you have no choice but to go to Comcast and because of this they can
charge anything they want 7. Why does quantity supplied tend to increase when prices go up and
decrease when prices go down? Why does quantity demanded move in the opposite direction? As
the supplier tries to increase production, more workers need to be hired. At first, these workers are
very productive. But, as the number of workers increase, average costs rise. The pool of workers
becomes restricted, meaning that additional workers are not as productive as the first hires. Average
costs tend to rise as production increases. This is captured by a supply curve that is upward sloping.
8. Describe the key principles of socialist and communist economic systems. Does more
government control mean less economic opportunity? Why or

Economic Systems
Introduction
Economic systems are organized way in which a state or nation allocates its resources and
apportions goods and services in the national community. An economic system is slackly defined as
country's plan for its services, goods produced, and the exact way in which its economic plan is
carried out. There are three types of economic systems exist, they are command economy, market
economy, and mixed economy. Command economy is also sometimes called planned economy. The
expectations of this type of economy is that all major decisions that related to the construction or
production, distribution, commodity and service prices are all made by the government. However, in
market economy, national and state governments play a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Prices also have the function to allocate and distribute a country's resources. Market leads to
complete effectiveness bringing about the best possible distribution of a country's resources in a
perfect world. This would only happen in a state of equilibrium and there is a unique price for every
commodity. But in a realistic world which is imperfect by nature, prices are never at equilibrium and
very unstable depending upon the vagaries of the market forces. This generally harms people living
below the poverty line. It is impossible for them to pay high prices in cases of demand shortage.
Thus, the free market model is not a viable option in developing countries which has a large number
of poor. Besides, producers are aim to minimize profit and maximize rent of production. Examples
of countries that are using this economy system are Hong Kong, USA, and UK. Many developing
countries like India and China are moving towards totally free–market economy. The command
economy is government directed. The market forces have very little say in such an economy. There
is no private property. On the other hand, a command economy aims at using all available resources
for developing either in advertising or marketing. In order to ensure that the required inputs are
available, the state would probably conduct some form of input–output analysis. All industries act as
the input from other industries and the producers act as the

Economic System: Mixed Economies In The United States
An economic systems is the way a country receives their money and resources and gives good and
services in the community such as Mixed Economies, Free Market, Socialism, communism, and
Fascism.
Mixed Economies is an economic system that protects private properties and it allows the free
market and the laws of supply and demand to determine prices, combining private and public
enterprise, it has the same features as capitalism. Mixed economies protect private properties and
allows economic freedom in the capital. There are many advantages of mixed economies it can
reduce the amount of government regulation, enable some government regulation where places have
market failure. Disadvantages are they are criticized by socialists for market forces ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Food is paid for health care is universal as well as clothing etc. Also there are many disadvantages
you never know where your food is going to come from or if you'll have a roof over your head
because it's all paid for by the government. Since everything is paid for everyone is lazy and doesn't
care to learn new skills. Also nothing is considered "yours" you own absolutely nothing.
Communism is as well an economic system. Communist look at everyone as equal and nobody is
the underdog there is only one class, also communism doesn't allow monopolies in businesses.
Health care, education and employment is accessible to citizens. Downfalls of communism is not
being able to better yourself because you're all equal also having no freedom is a big disadvantage.
No freedom of speech as well whoever goes against the government will be punished.
Fascism is a political philosophy that exalts nation and often race above the individual. Fascism is
not used in today's world it was used back in Germany in the 20th century. When they used it there
were many pros such as; it specialized in making the country as a whole the money is more spent on
cultural improvements like museums and building national land marks. There are many cons as well
like the whole country in under control by one dictator so nobody has the freedom of

Economic Systems And Economic System
Economic system
"Economic system is that it consists of those situations which a given people or nation has nations
has chosen or accepted as the means through which resources are utilized for the satisfaction of
human wants." (studylecturenotes.com, 2016)
Economic system allows countries to follow procedure to produce goods using resources available
in the countries. It allows the countries to know how much and for whom to produce. There are
different types of economic systems in different countries and they all have their different
regulations according to their planned economic system. There are two different types of market:
Free Market and Planned market.
Free market
"An economic system in which prices are determined by unrestricted competition between privately
owned businesses" (oxforddictionaries.com, 2016)
The free market is the economic system where the government has no or few restrictions on buying
and selling goods from different countries. There are no tariffs or regulation processes being
determined for trades. This is a very good economy to start a business has it has no interest rate,
exchange rate or any force to stop them exchange their commodities in order to trade with different
countries. The free market allows the individual or group of people running the business to make
decision by themselves and allow that ease to trade with different countries at fair exchange
schemes.
UK as Free Market:
"The UK is the 9th Largest export economy in the

The Collapse Of The Soviet Union
The collapse of the Soviet Union had ended the communist hold on Eastern Europe and surrounding
former communist states. The year 1990 had also marked the beginning of rapid economic and
social transition from a communist state to a democratic market based economy. Milton Friedman
coined the term shock policy, also referred to as economic liberalism, to describe the abrupt release
of currency and price controls, the extraction of state subsidies, large scale privatization of former
public owned assets, and immediate trade liberalization. Jeffrey Sachs further evolved Friedman's
notion to create his own coined concept, shock therapy. The first occurrence of the liberal economic
concept of shock policy centred on the ideals of the University of Chicago, transpired in Chile in
1975, carried out by the military coup lead by Augusto Pinochet to initiate neoliberal pro–market
reforms. Shock therapy, economic liberalism, grew in popularity in the 1970's, becoming the
common answer to battle economic crisis. This paper will examine the use of shock therapy in the
transition of post– communist states, comparing and contrasting the benefits and consequences of
initializing such a rapid reform. This paper will examine the state of Poland that has successfully
transitioned through shock therapy to open market democracies and those who had failed to
transition because of it, investigating the obstacles and drawbacks. Since 1990 Eastern European
countries from the Baltic to the

Importance Of Cultural Norms And Practices In Business
establishes their rituals and justifies what are their norms and values. Businesses wanting to expand
to different nations must take into account the countries' culture and values in order to produce and
manufacture products and services according to the norms of their society, and ensure their culture
is respected and preserved in the way the products are marketed and manufactured. The products
must be available and accessible without concerns of dissing religion and aspects of their culture
and way of life.
Businesses can take advantage in a developing country through specialisation, which is producing
products custom made and specifically catered to a certain culture which is similar in various
countries. Businesses will have to overcome language barriers, learn about others religion, receive
advice from local experts of the country and become familiar to the people's behaviour, customs and
aesthetics to properly and appropriately distribute its products
Specialisation can be see through Dr Matthew McDougall investing into the Chinese Market, and
became the founder of DaigouSales. Dr McDougall had found that Chinese students and immigrants
were purchasing Australian products through family and friends of their hometown. They began
exporting products of interest and learnt new ways to do business in China. They became aware of
the Chinese culture and the way their customers were updated on the latest fashion trends and
therefore marketed their products successfully. Their

The Relationship Between Capitalism And Democracy
The relationship between capitalism and democracy has been defined by many as fundamental
complementary ideologies, and social scientists have discovered an undeniable link between the two
structures with some suggesting that "where either capitalism or democracy flourishes, the other
must soon follow" (Reich, 2007). Currently, the main form of modern democracy is polyarchal
democracy which originated from the Greek word polyarkhe, meaning 'many rule'. This infers that
multiple people within a government system possess political power, making it neither a
dictatorship nor a pure democracy ruled by the people. The relationship between these two
complementary yet conflicting social structures have led some to believe that there are in fact
enemies rather than corresponding entities due to the selfish and competitive nature of capitalism
negatively affecting a democracy's notion of equality.
Joseph Schumpeter however, proposed in 'Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy' that democracy
may function just as effectively under socialism rather than drawing the conclusion that democracy
is only generated under the conditions of capitalism. Other social scientists like Rueschemeyer,
Stephens and Stephens (1992) believe that "democracy arises due to its functional fit with the
advanced industrial economy", which provides an answer as to why many 3rd world and developing
countries still have yet to implicate the form of democracy in their political systems due to their lack
of industrial

Founded In 1966, Best Buy Is An American Multinational
Founded in 1966, Best Buy is an American multinational electronic store for technology and
entertainment products and services that have stores in countries like Canada, Mexico, Turkey, UK,
but it no longer does in China (Fang, 2012). China's economic environment has gone through major
ideological reforms. Their economic policy went from a centrally planned socialist economy to
more of a socialist market economy during the 1970's. With the reforms enabling rapid
industrialization, this pushed citizens away from the agriculture sector and transition its people into
the cities. China has the world's largest population and this transition helped strengthen and grow
their middle class (U.S. Census, 2017). This becomes the most ideal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, the fixed prices at Best Buy didn't put pressure on consumers to purchase items right
away. Instead it allowed them to research cheaper prices for the same product on the web. "Many
chain operators have strong bargaining power with suppliers and efficient management of the supply
chain, which gives companies cost advantages that allows them to retain profit margin," (Fang,
2012). These issues hurt Best Buy's expansion into China and, "by 2011, Best Buy closed all of its
stores in China and in December 2014, they announced its decision to sell its Five Star stores to
Jiayuan," (Bailey, 2015). Where Best Buy focused on marketing and customer services to
differentiate their store from others, their competitors understood that the Chinese consumer was
more concerned with products and "good deals" on prices. Since a global strategy requires lots of
centralization, this slowed down Corporate's responsive times to adjust to China's local market.
I believe Best Buy's performance could have been better had they entered the Chinese market
differently. Buying land and building these few big stores similar to what you may find in every
American suburban community created expenses that made it more difficult for Best Buy to
capitalize on. The congestion of people living in metropolitan areas of China made accessibility
very complicated. I would've suggested renting or leasing out smaller retail

China Unbalanced Essay
CASE STUDY
CHINA "UNBALANCED"
In this case study, we will attempt to answer what measures China took in preparation for
acceptance into the WTO and how it adjusted to its eventual admittance in December of 2001. We
will also review some of the problems associated with China's economic growth strategy.
We will begin our analysis of these questions by examining China's economy at the time of Deng
Xiaoping's accession to power in 1978 and the economic growth strategy he and his successor
implemented which ultimately led China to ascension into the WTO. We will then review various
conditions imposed upon China by the WTO and how China reacted to those changes and to what
extent these lead to China's current status and interaction ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
. Xiaoping implemented significant change going from a centrally planned economy run by the
state, towards a private entrepreneur market based economy. This transition to a new type of
socialist thinking, known as the socialist market economy, proved highly successful as it allowed
China to move from a nation in poverty ruled by a single person to the second largest economy in
the world. A more sudden or abrupt change could have easily resulted in the fall of China's
economy, similar to what certain European countries experienced in 1991 at the end of the cold war
between the super powers.
One of the founding principles of a free market system is to give individuals freedom of choice in
how they invest their assets, choose what to consume, improve their knowledge and skills, choose
how they will use their income and invest their wealth or assets as they see fit. Xiaoping began his
growth strategy by allowing farmers to sell some of their output on the black market with a view of
increasing demand, which in turn gave farmers incentive to produce more and increased production
surplus. By doing this, not only did the government increase its production surplus, but it also
allowed its impoverished citizens easier access to fruit, meat and vegetables and reduced the
country's reliance on food imports to sustain its large population This strategy was an indirect way
of subjecting people to competition

Comparing Russia And China Relations
Russia and China face many similar challenges in their transitions to market economies. Both
countries have extremely large populations and huge landmasses. They also both are autonomous
countries that have experienced thousands of years of autocracy. Historically being land empires in
the center of Eurasia, they developed strong central state legacies with distinct identities, cultures,
and legitimacies. As former command socialist economies, establishing a market capitalist system
was a daunting task for both Russia and China. The nations had to attempt to invent the process
throughout transition. They must establish property rights, establish banking systems, deal with
inflation, and overcome ideological antipathy towards capitalism. Considering the similar factors
and conditions both nations dealt with creates for interesting comparison and contrast in analyzing
the causes of China's successes and Russia's failures in transitioning to a market economy. In this
paper, I will compare and contrast the role of property rights in the economic transitions of Russia
and China through an analysis of the states' approaches to transformation and the role of the states
throughout reform. Property rights detail what one is able and not able to do with a particular asset.
They are a package of rights that include the power to consume, to obtain income from, and to
alienate assets, including land, capital, and labor. The state, groups, and individuals as well may
exercise rights

Difference Between Capitalism And Capitalism
Economic Systems: Capitalism & Socialism Ownership is key to both capitalism and socialism. In a
capitalist economy, the means of production, facilities, technology, land etc., are privately owned.
The primary goal is for the owners to make a profit (Smith, 1910). Though that is not to say that
owners are the only beneficiaries in aa capitalist economy. According to George Reisman in his
Treatise on economics, you do not have to own a means of production to receive their benefits, you
merely have to be a consumer in the marketplace. He says there is a general benefit when consumers
can buy the products produced by the capitalists (326). In contrast, a socialist economy is
distinguished by the major means of production being owned by the state. People do not work for
their own good, but for the good of everyone else as well. Wealth that is earned is then distributed
among everyone in the society. Some of the advantages of a capitalist system include greater
consumer choice in the marketplace. Economic efficiency as well, since goods and services are
produced based on demand, it gives producers the incentive to cut costs and avoid waste. Economic
growth is also possible in a capitalist system. When the economy grows and the GDP (gross
domestic product) rises, living standards are observed to increase as well. As well as advantages,
there are some disadvantages as well. These include the creation of monopolies. When a business
business becomes a monopoly they can, and most

The Pros And Cons Of Capitalism In China
China is the second largest economy in the world. It has become the fastest growing economy in the
world with an average rate of 10% for the last thirty years. The largest exporter and second largest
importer of goods has brought China to be ranked first in the foreign exchange reserves. The
country with thousands of years of history, started off and continues today as mostly an agrarian
economy. Over time China's economy continues to change and prosper. Starting with the first
economic change in the early twentieth century, which occurred when the GMD (the Nationalist
Party) lost control due to its poor economic performance. This in turn led to their defeat by the CCP.
During that time many peasants lost their farmland and this led to a peasant ... Show more content
In 1953, was when China became a planned economy, based after the planning system of the Soviet
Union. A planned economy is where the government controls everything. Soon after many peasants
risked their lives to sign an agreement in 1978, Deng Xiaoping (the CCP leader during the time)
who supported them started a nationwide reform. China would then begin to move away from a
planned economy and towards a market economy (Lan Li, Chinese economy slides).
Group 2 opposed the notion that the Western model of capitalism may not be the only way, we
argued that it was the only way. Having said many pros of having a capitalistic economy and the
cons of having a socialist free market economy. Within capitalism, there is efficiency, political and
economic freedom, and economic growth........
Within China's socialist free market economy there are many cons including the one party control,
corruption, societal inequalities, and economic downturn. In Gregory C. Chow's book Knowing
China, he speaks a lot about the different aspects of Chinese society including the government and
the economy. He mentions both positives and negatives of the different laws and regulations placed
upon by the government. The CCP, the one party control system which is in charge of China has a

Market vs. Command Economy Essay
Market vs. Command Economy What is the main purpose of the economic system? The main
purpose of the economic system is method used to produce and distribute goods and service. The
three economic questions are: "What goods should be produced?" "How should these goods and
services be produced" And "Who consumes these goods and services?" The characteristic of a
market economics is that self–interest is the motivating force in the free market, self regulating
market. The interaction of buyers and sellers motivated by self–interest and regulated by
competition, all happen without a central plan. In a market economy, economic decisions are made
by individuals and are based on exchange or trade. However, characteristics of a command
economic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firms buy productive resources in return for making factor payments at factor prices. Product
market is a mechanism that allows people to easily buy and sell products. The interaction between
product and factor markets involves the principle of derived demand. Derived demand refers to the
demand for productive resources, which is derived from the demand for final goods and services or
output. Firms obtain the inputs or factors of production in the factors markets. The goods are sold in
the products markets. In most respects these markets are the same. Price is determined by the
interaction of supply and demand, firm's attempt to maximize profits, factors can influence and
change the equilibrium price and quantities bought and sold and the laws of supply and demand
hold. Consumers (households), in pursuit of their self–interest, have the incentive to look for lower
prices. An incentive is the hope of reward or fear of punishment that encourages a person to behave
in a certain way. Free market offer a wider variety of goods and services, and consumers in essence
decide what gets produced which is called consumer sovereignty. Additionally, Centrally Planned
Economies usually involve 2 types of government: Socialism which is a social and political
philosophy based on the belief that democratic means should be used to distribute wealth evenly
throughout a

Capitalism And Neoliberalism
Throughout history, the concept of politics has reduced through many centuries. Since the beginning
of time the implementation of governance has been a recurring question. Globally, there are
different ideologies and political systems that our citizens must follow. One major concept from the
the ideology Neoliberalism is Globalization which impacts our society in ways that many do not
see. Another ideology that affects our society is the concept of Capitalism. All aspects of Politics
affects the role and nature of the state as we know it today. Neoliberalism is an ideology that express
a means for a free market economy. A free market economy is an economy that those who have
access to, can take part in. As stated before, Globalization is a subheading of Neoliberalism. The
concept of globalization is to unify the globe into one, so that society can run smoother.
Globalization, comes with the concept of a global village. The three components of this "village" are
an open market, society, and technology. An open market is the free movement of goods and
services. This feature of the village allows for new ideas and creations to be introduced to our
society. An open society is the collapsing of national boundaries with the free movement of people.
The free movement of people brings on new nationalities and languages which makes us very
diverse. Lastly, open technology is that anyone can use the free market. This concept of the village
gives those who can, access to the free

Command Economy Vs Command Research Paper
What is a market economy and what kind of government does it rule under? What is a command
economy and does it rule under the government or is it more of a freedom economy? How are
market and command economies similar and different? Command and market economies are
different, but they have the same objective, which is keeping everyone happy and economically
stable. In a market economy, the private–sector business and consumers decide what they will
produce and purchase, with little government intervention (Article #1). In chapter 18, section 1, the
author says," Under capitalism, the means of production are privately owned. Supply and demand
determine prices, and businesses are free to direct resources into activities that promise the greatest
profits"(Page 492). the author is explaining that capitalism productive resources into activities are
privately owned and operated. There are several advantages of capitalism, but the main advantage is
efficiency. Some examples of the advantages of capitalism are freedom, capitalism is highly
decentralized, high degree of consumer satisfaction, and flexibility to accommodate change.
Although not all governments are perfect, capitalism has its advantages, which include that
capitalism ignores the production of many public goods such as roads, public schools, a system of
justice, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In a market economy there is little government control while in a command economy there is total
government control. Socialism addresses the FOR WHOM question exactly. A big advantage to
capitalism is that they give you more freedom than communism and socialism combined. If you
want to have freedom you will chose to live in a market economy, and if you want the government
to control everything you do, you will decide to live in a command

Economic Systems Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Andrea Lee

More from Andrea Lee (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Economic Systems Essay