1. Reading Strategies:
What do “Good” Readers do?
Aurora Tsai
Department of Modern Languages
Carnegie Mellon University
2. Workshop Overview
1. What do “good” and “poor” readers do
when they read?
2. What reading skills and strategies do you
already use? Will you try in the future?
3. “Poor” Readers . . .
1. Are less adept at recognizing a comprehension problem
exists or in identifying its source
2. Often feel the need to understand every word/detail
rather than focusing attention on main ideas
3. Use more test-taking strategies (process of elimination,
getting help from another question)
4. Have less resources (i.e., strategies) for solving problems
in comprehension
(E. Block, 1992; Stavans & Oden, 1993; Upton & Cohen, 2006; Yitiger et al.,
2005)
4. “Good” Readers . . .
1. Identify the purpose of reading
– To answer question X
– To get a general understanding about the topic
– To write paper (e.g., analysis, argument)
2. Activate relevant background knowledge
– considered essential for learning (Koda & Yamashita, 2017)
– From relevant personal experiences
– From relevant class discussions or previously read papers
– From news, media, documentaries, essays, etc.
(E. Block, 1992; Brown, Palinscar, & Armbruster, 2004; Janzen & Stoller, 1998;
Sheory & Mokhtari, 2001; Yitiger, Saricoban, Gurses, 2005)
5. “Good” Readers . . .
3. Allocate attention to main ideas
3. Critically evaluate content of text internally and
externally
– Does this agree with what that other author said?
– Is the author contradicting themselves?
– This contrasts with everything else I have learned about this
topic . . . is there new information I should be considering?
(E. Block, 1992; Brown, Palinscar, & Armbruster, 2004; Janzen & Stoller, 1998;
Sheory & Mokhtari, 2001; Yitiger, Saricoban, Gurses, 2005)
“Hindi and English are important world languages.”
6. “Good” Readers . . .
5. Monitor comprehension (identify, strategize, evaluate)
– Identify where they are having difficulty
– Draw from a variety of strategies to solve the problem
– Evaluate whether or not the strategy worked
6. Draw/test inferences (predict, interpret, evaluate, etc.)
– Make predictions about the rest of the text
– Check if their prediction was correct
(E. Block, 1992; Brown, Palinscar, & Armbruster, 2004; Janzen & Stoller,
1998; Sheory & Mokhtari, 2001; Yitiger, Saricoban, Gurses, 2005)
7. Which strategies do you want to work on?
• Identify the purpose of reading:
Decide if you are trying to learn about the content, writing style/structure, or something else?
Ask questions as you read?
• Activate relevant background knowledge: Think about . . .
Personal experiences with the topic
Prior knowledge about the topic
What other authors have said or written about the topic
• Allocate attention to main ideas:
Focus the majority of your time on understanding main ideas instead of minor details?
• Critically evaluate content of text internally and externally: Check if author’s
ideas are . . .
Consistent with the rest of the reading passage?
Consistent with other information you have learned
• Monitor comprehension: Actively . . .
Identify where you have break-downs in comprehending the text?
Use a variety of strategies to solve break-downs in comprehension
Evaluate whether or not your comprehension strategy worked
• Draw/test inferences:
Make predictions about what will come next
Try to interpret the authors’ ideas based on the text and what you already know?
Evaluate whether or not your prediction was correct?
Do you feel like you are a slow reader?
Do you want to know what research indicates about the effective reading strategies?
If so, this video should be helpful.
Research consistently shows that “good” readers draw from a large variety of strategies when they have trouble comprehending a text, while “poor” readers rely on reusing the same ones.
In addition, good readers have higher metacognitive awareness of the strategies they use.
For this reason, please think about which of the “good” reader strategies you currently use as you watch the rest of this video. Many of these strategies overlap.
Brown, Palinscar & Armbruster conducted a meta-analysis on reading strategies, and found that there are six reading strategies that are consistently recognized in helping students read.
ID purpose
Academic reading vs reading for pleasure or entertainment
Within academic reading: reading to write a paper, reading to prepare for class discussion, reading to learn
Within reading to learn: comparing author’s ideas, definitions, arguments, logic, evidence OR noticing what type of language, rhetoric, transition phrases they use to organize their paper and transition from one idea to another
If the reader isn’t assigned a purpose, they create their own purpose by generating questions: This paper is about …. Before finishing this paper, I want to answer the Q, “ “.
Activate relevant BG K
Personal experiences that are related to the reading topic
Other papers you’ve read on the same topic; other author’s arguments, supportive evidence
This skill is considered essential for the learning process
*****Notes****** (not part of presentation)
Brown et al. and Janzen & Stoller is from L1 research—doesn’t include L2 skills. Block (1992) looked at diff.s b/t L1 and L2 strategies and found that
Schema Theory aligns with 2 (orderly searches of memory), 6,
These strategies were used to inform Palinscar & Brown’s development of Reciprical reading, which has become a widespread pedagogical technique in ESL teaching and learning programs. These strategies are also used in SERT
Allocate attention to main ideas
Rather than looking up every unknown word and detail in a passage, good readers focus on guessing or looking up the meaning of key words and phrases that are important to the overall passage.
There may be some attention paid to details, but they are quickly connected to the main ideas of each paragraph
Critically evaluate content of text internally and externally
Good readers think about whether or not the information within the text is consistent: does the argument have a logical flow? Or are there inconsistencies in what the author is saying?
Good readers also compare what the author is saying with external information: (think of funny example)
*****Notes****** (not part of presentation)
Brown et al. and Janzen & Stoller is from L1 research—doesn’t include L2 skills. Block (1992) looked at diff.s b/t L1 and L2 strategies and found that
Schema Theory aligns with 2 (orderly searches of memory), 6,
Monitor comprehension
Good readers are able to use previous strategies to monitor their comprehension. They’ll identify that they don’t understand a certain part of the text, use strategies (reread, guessing words from context, reading other sections and coming back, guess and come back), and evaluate whether or not the strategy worked.
They will also draw/test inferences. For example, they will make predictions about what the rest of the text will say and see if their prediction is correct.
*****Notes****** (not part of presentation)
Brown et al. and Janzen & Stoller is from L1 research—doesn’t include L2 skills. Block (1992) looked at diff.s b/t L1 and L2 strategies and found that
Schema Theory aligns with 2 (orderly searches of memory), 6,
These strategies were used to inform Palinscar & Brown’s development of Recipricol reading, which has become a widespread pedagogical technique in ESL teaching and learning programs.
They also repeat words and phrases
*****Notes****** (not part of presentation)
Brown et al. and Janzen & Stoller is from L1 research—doesn’t include L2 skills. Block (1992) looked at diff.s b/t L1 and L2 strategies and found that
Schema Theory aligns with 2 (orderly searches of memory), 6,