1. AA’s “Big Book”:
A Secular Decomposition of Chapter 4
By Anonymouse
Abstract
This inflammatory, and deeply nihilistic, monograph provides a semiotic parsing of the “We
Agnostics” chapter of the Fourth Edition of AA’s “Big Book” of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA).1
Part I of the paper consists of a brainy discussion of non-trivial syntactic issues in the text. In
particular, this segment identifies the core symbolic terms and abstractions in Chapter 4, and
explores their relation to each other, to their denotata, as well as to AA’s well-known tautological,
solipsistic worldview. Also supplied, in the form of hissy endnotes to the text (which is
reproduced here, without permission, in its mind-numbing totality), is a listing of the grammatical
infelicities that abound in Ch. 4 – one of the many transparent, if not disgustingly sophomoric,
ploys used by the author of the text (see below) to establish his so-called “salt of the earth” props.
Part II is concerned with textual pragmatics. A clarification of the intended effects of this body of
symbolic terminology on secular alcoholics (who might read the chapter in some unguarded,
hung-over moment of intellectual so-called weakness) animates the lively discussion. Important
(underhanded) rhetorical techniques, as well underlying (false) assumptions, contained within the
chapter, are identified explicitly, especially those used as so-called talking points in AA meetings
by evangelical boors. The third segment of the paper, cleverly known as Part III, attempts a
contextual semantic assessment of its own obfuscatory argumentation.
Finally, the paper concludes with a refutation of the persistent, and, yes, malicious, theory that the
author of this chapter, and in fact of the “Big Book” itself, was not the Wilson of AA record (see
below), but in fact another Wilson, an English doppelgänger, whose actual name first appeared a
hundred years earlier, as a character in a short story by Edgar Allen Poe, which was published in
Tales of the Grotesque and Arabesque. An important study supporting this provocative view (by
the well-known late Algerian intellectual, Jacquie Derrida, whose landmark study, W. Griffith
Wilson and Poe’s Opium-laced Imagination, is frequently, if not incessantly, invoked in some of
the tonier AA Topic meetings) will be examined, and the staggering implications of this
revolutionary (but “deeply misguided”) theory discredited.
Before proceeding (with the hard sell portion of this abstract), it should be stated here for the socalled record that it was in fact one of the co-founders of AA who wrote the “Big Book” in the late
1930s. The 400-page completed manuscript, the plagiaristic writing of which some otherwise
sane, recovering alcoholics in AA view as a providential miracle, a veritable act of God, directly
inspired by Holy Scripture, was subject to various revisions by members of the then-nascent
movement, including the Akron, Ohio-based other co-founder of AA, a Dr. Robert Smith, an
(understandably, given his occupation, not to mention, battle-axe wife) alcoholic proctologist who
not only suffered from notorious sleep disorders, but was an reformed, intolerant religious
fundamentalist to boot, one noticeably (and sadly) contemptuous of both the once “gentler sex”
(he was given to characterize female substance abusers as “fallen women”) and agnostics.2
Nevertheless, it is useful to recognize, for the purposes of this academic discussion, that it was a
1
“Alcoholics Anonymous,” Fourth Edition, Copyright 2007, Alcoholics Anonymous World
Services, Inc.
2
Id., “Doctor Bob’s Nightmare.”