Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
SeminarPaperPresentation.pptx
1. BALANCING RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN WITH
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN SPENT
CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN EU
Kamrul Faisal
Faculty of Law
University of Turku
Seminar Paper
2. PURPOSE
• whether right to be forgotten is properly balanced with
freedom of expression in spent convictions in EU.
3. JUSTIFICATION
• Facts:
People with criminal record- Reformed- Criminal records
online in news, articles
Employment, Insurance, Educational opportunities, Aspects
of civil society
75% of employers discriminate against applicants on the
basis of a criminal record, common for employers to use the
internet as a key part of their recruitment process. To some,
it’s human nature to ‘google’ somebody
4. PAPER AT A GLANCE
• Chapter 1: Introduction
• Chapter 2: Propagation to both Rights
• Chapter 3: Balancing Issues
• Chapter 4: Role Players/ Sources in Balancing and Gaps
• Chapter 5: Conclusion
5. EXISTING BALANCING PRACTICES
• Derived from Google Spain
1. Balancing public access to information and privacy rights: public
interest vs. right to removal
2. Balancing access to archived information and right to be
forgotten: scientific, historic or research purpose vs. right to
delink
3. Balancing different provisions of CFR: CJEU upholds right to be
forgotten at the expense of freedom of Charter. Charter gives Art.
11 and Art. 8 equal priority
• Clash between GDPR and ECJ Practice on Privacy Rights:
7. FINDINGS
Balancing is in its grey zone:
1. GDPR ignites tension between these two rights; Art. 17(3)(a)
2. CJEU failed to formulate a test to prioritize among public and
private interest when both interests are competing in the same
litigation
3. Traits of Art. 8 and 11 of CFR reamins in discomfort
4. Disharmonization incited by ECJ, is not harmonized under
GDPR because right is provided without insurance.
8. CONCLUSION
Balancing has just entered into youth after surviving
infancy. To put differently, it is in 2nd generation. We
need to push it to 3rd generation for more tangible
norms.