Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Content Name: TEACHING EXPERIENCE RUBRIC Grid ViewList View Meets or Exceeds Mostly Meets Approaches Does Not Meet Expectations          Comprehensive Assessment Points: 3.84 (16.00%) Clear and concise discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs,Clear and comprehensive patient assessment data to support a deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis. Feedback: Points: 2.9184 (12.16%) Vague and incomplete discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs.Vague and incomplete patient assessment data to support deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis. Feedback: Points: 1.92 (8.00%) Vague and incomplete discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs. Feedback: Points: 0.96 (4.00%) No discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data and anticipated learning needs.No comprehensive patient assessment data to support deficient knowledge. Feedback: Patient Learning Needs Assessment Points: 3.84 (16.00%) Clear and complete assessment of learner (patient /family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.Clear identification of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs. Feedback: Points: 2.9184 (12.16%) Incomplete assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.Incomplete identification of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs. Feedback: Points: 1.92 (8.00%) Incomplete assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present. Feedback: Points: 0.96 (4.00%) No assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.No discussion of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs Feedback: Organization/ Evidence-based Information Points: 4.08 (17.00%) Open and closing rema ...

1. Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate
student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and
made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to
change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: TEACHING EXPERIENCE RUBRIC
Grid ViewList View
Meets or Exceeds
Mostly Meets
Approaches
Does Not Meet Expectations
Comprehensive
Assessment
Points:
3.84 (16.00%)

2. Clear and concise
discussion of patient’s
admission diagnosis,
demographic data,
and anticipated learning
needs,Clear and comprehensive
patient assessment data to support a deficient
knowledge nursing
diagnosis.
Feedback:
Points:
2.9184 (12.16%)

3. Vague and incomplete
discussion of patient’s
admission diagnosis,
demographic data, and
anticipated learning
needs.Vague and incomplete
patient assessment data to support deficient
knowledge nursing
diagnosis.
Feedback:
Points:
1.92 (8.00%)

4. Vague and incomplete
discussion of patient’s
admission diagnosis,
demographic data, and
anticipated learning
needs.
Feedback:
Points:
0.96 (4.00%)

5. No discussion of
patient’s admission
diagnosis, demographic
data and anticipated
learning needs.No comprehensive
patient assessment data
to support deficient knowledge.
Feedback:
Patient Learning
Needs
Assessment
Points:
3.84 (16.00%)

6. Clear and complete
assessment of learner
(patient
/family), teaching needs,
and special learning
needs, if present.Clear identification of
patient’s strengths and
weaknesses relevant to
learning needs.
Feedback:
Points:
2.9184 (12.16%)

7. Incomplete assessment
of learner (patient
and/or family), teaching
needs, and special
learning needs, if
present.Incomplete
identification of
patient’s strengths and
weaknesses relevant to
learning needs.
Feedback:
Points:
1.92 (8.00%)

8. Incomplete assessment
of learner (patient
and/or family), teaching
needs, and special
learning needs, if
present.
Feedback:
Points:
0.96 (4.00%)

9. No assessment of
learner (patient and/or
family), teaching needs,
and special learning
needs, if present.No discussion of
patient’s strengths and
weaknesses relevant to
learning needs
Feedback:
Organization/
Evidence-based
Information
Points:
4.08 (17.00%)

10. Open and closing
remarks that capture
patient’s attention.Clear and correct
statement of 2 teaching
objectives.Clear and organized
presentation of
evidence-based patient
teaching.
Feedback:
Points:
3.1008 (12.92%)

11. Open or closing remarks
displayed.Vague/incorrect
teaching objectives.Vague/disorganized
presentation of
evidence-based patient
teaching
Feedback:
Points:
2.04 (8.50%)

12. Open or closing remarks
displayed.Vague/incorrect
teaching objectives
Feedback:
Points:
1.02 (4.25%)
No open or closing
remarks displayed.No teaching objective
stated.Poor or disorganized

13. presentation of teaching
from inappropriate
sources.
Feedback:
Body Language
Points:
4.08 (17.00%)
Direct eye contact and
appropriate
gestures/movements

14. during teaching.Relaxed, self-confident
nature and no mistake
during teaching.
Feedback:
Points:
3.1008 (12.92%)
Minimal eye contact and
little movement or
descriptive gesture
during teaching.Mild tension, lack of
self-confidence and
difficulty recovering

15. from mistakes.
Feedback:
Points:
2.04 (8.50%)
Minimal eye contact and
little movement or
descriptive gesture
during teaching.

16. Feedback:
Points:
1.02 (4.25%)
No eye contact and
inappropriate gestures
during teaching.Tension and
nervousness obvious,
trouble recovering from
mistakes.
Feedback:

17. Voice
Points:
4.08 (17.00%)
Use of clear speech and
inflection, maintains the interest of the learner.
Feedback:

18. Points:
3.1008 (12.92%)
Some level of
inflection and clarity during delivery.
Feedback:
Points:
2.04 (8.50%)

19. Monotone voice with
some inflection of delivery
Feedback:
Points:
1.02 (4.25%)

20. Monotone voice
consistently.
Feedback:
Learning
Evaluation
Points:
4.08 (17.00%)
Clear/appropriate

21. evaluation of patient’s
response and
effectiveness/ineffective
ness of teaching.Reflective analysis of
teaching including
discussion of strengths
and weaknesses.
Feedback:
Points:
3.1008 (12.92%)
Vague/inappropriate
evaluation of patient’s

22. response and
effectiveness/
ineffectiveness of
teaching.Vague reflective analysis
of teaching including
discussion of strengths
and weaknesses.
Feedback:
Points:
2.04 (8.50%)
Vague/inappropriate
evaluation of patient’s

23. response and
effectiveness/
ineffectiveness of
teaching.
Feedback:
Points:
1.02 (4.25%)
Vague/inappropriate
evaluation of patient’s
response and
effectiveness/
ineffectiveness of

24. teachin
of teaching including
discussion of strengths
and weaknesses.Absent reflective
Feedback:
Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Comprehensive
Assessment--
Levels of Achievement:
Meets or Exceeds
3.84 (16.00%) points

25. Clear and concise
discussion of patient’s
admission diagnosis,
demographic data,
and anticipated learning
needs,Clear and comprehensive
patient assessment data to support a deficient
knowledge nursing
diagnosis.
Mostly Meets
2.9184 (12.16%) points
Vague and incomplete
discussion of patient’s
admission diagnosis,
demographic data, and
anticipated learning
needs.Vague and incomplete
patient assessment data to support deficient
knowledge nursing
diagnosis.
Approaches
1.92 (8.00%) points

26. Vague and incomplete
discussion of patient’s
admission diagnosis,
demographic data, and
anticipated learning
needs.
Does Not Meet Expectations
0.96 (4.00%) points
No discussion of
patient’s admission
diagnosis, demographic
data and anticipated
learning needs.No comprehensive
patient assessment data
to support deficient knowledge.
Feedback:

27. Patient Learning
Needs
Assessment--
Levels of Achievement:
Meets or Exceeds
3.84 (16.00%) points
Clear and complete
assessment of learner
(patient
/family), teaching needs,
and special learning
needs, if present.Clear identification of
patient’s strengths and
weaknesses relevant to
learning needs.
Mostly Meets
2.9184 (12.16%) points
Incomplete assessment
of learner (patient
and/or family), teaching

28. needs, and special
learning needs, if
present.Incomplete
identification of
patient’s strengths and
weaknesses relevant to
learning needs.
Approaches
1.92 (8.00%) points
Incomplete assessment
of learner (patient
and/or family), teaching
needs, and special
learning needs, if
present.
Does Not Meet Expectations
0.96 (4.00%) points
No assessment of
learner (patient and/or
family), teaching needs,
and special learning
needs, if present.No discussion of

29. patient’s strengths and
weaknesses relevant to
learning needs
Feedback:
Organization/
Evidence-based
Information--
Levels of Achievement:
Meets or Exceeds
4.08 (17.00%) points
Open and closing
remarks that capture
patient’s attention.Clear and correct
statement of 2 teaching
objectives.Clear and organized
presentation of
evidence-based patient

30. teaching.
Mostly Meets
3.1008 (12.92%) points
Open or closing remarks
displayed.Vague/incorrect
teaching objectives.Vague/disorganized
presentation of
evidence-based patient
teaching
Approaches
2.04 (8.50%) points
Open or closing remarks
displayed.Vague/incorrect
teaching objectives
Does Not Meet Expectations
1.02 (4.25%) points

31. No open or closing
remarks displayed.No teaching objective
stated.Poor or disorganized
presentation of teaching
from inappropriate
sources.
Feedback:
Body Language--
Levels of Achievement:
Meets or Exceeds
4.08 (17.00%) points
Direct eye contact and
appropriate
gestures/movements
during teaching.Relaxed, self-confident
nature and no mistake

32. during teaching.
Mostly Meets
3.1008 (12.92%) points
Minimal eye contact and
little movement or
descriptive gesture
during teaching.Mild tension, lack of
self-confidence and
difficulty recovering
from mistakes.
Approaches
2.04 (8.50%) points
Minimal eye contact and
little movement or
descriptive gesture
during teaching.
Does Not Meet Expectations
1.02 (4.25%) points

33. No eye contact and
inappropriate gestures
during teaching.Tension and
nervousness obvious,
trouble recovering from
mistakes.
Feedback:
Voice--
Levels of Achievement:
Meets or Exceeds
4.08 (17.00%) points
Use of clear speech and
inflection, maintains the interest of the learner.

34. Mostly Meets
3.1008 (12.92%) points
Some level of
inflection and clarity during delivery.
Approaches
2.04 (8.50%) points
Monotone voice with
some inflection of delivery
Does Not Meet Expectations
1.02 (4.25%) points
Monotone voice
consistently.

35. Feedback:
Learning
Evaluation--
Levels of Achievement:
Meets or Exceeds
4.08 (17.00%) points
Clear/appropriate
evaluation of patient’s
response and
effectiveness/ineffective
ness of teaching.Reflective analysis of
teaching including
discussion of strengths
and weaknesses.
Mostly Meets
3.1008 (12.92%) points

36. Vague/inappropriate
evaluation of patient’s
response and
effectiveness/
ineffectiveness of
teaching.Vague reflective analysis
of teaching including
discussion of strengths
and weaknesses.
Approaches
2.04 (8.50%) points
Vague/inappropriate
evaluation of patient’s
response and
effectiveness/
ineffectiveness of
teaching.
Does Not Meet Expectations
1.02 (4.25%) points
Vague/inappropriate

37. evaluation of patient’s
response and
effectiveness/
ineffectiveness of
of teaching including
discussion of strengths
and weaknesses.Absent reflective
Feedback:
Name:TEACHING EXPERIENCE RUBRIC