A comparative study of talent management opportunities and
1.
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
• TO STUDY TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTE IN AGRA.
• TO COMPARE THE TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF VARIOUS
INSTITUTE OF AGRA.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
SAMPLE SIZE
WE WILL SELECT 100 RESPONDENTS.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
THE STUDY IS RESTRICTED TO AGRA COMPRISING STUDENTS.
LOCALE OF THE STUDY
STUDENTS IN AGRA WILL BE PURPOSIVELY SELECTED AS THE LOCALE OF THE STUDY.
RESEARCH DESIGN
I WILL CONDUCT THE PRIMARY DATA THROUGH SELF-MADE QUESTIONNAIRE. QUESTIONNAIRE
WILL BE MADE IN DIFFERENT SECTIONS SO THAT ALL THE OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ARE
COVERED AND RELIABLE DATA PERTAINING TO EVERY OBJECT CAN BE OBTAINED.
4. JUSTIFICATION OF SAMPLE SIZE
THE RESPONDENTS FOR COLLECTING THE DATA WOULD BE CHOSEN FROM AGRA. THE
RESPONDENTS WOULD BE SELECTED THROUGH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DATA.
STATISTICAL TOOLS
THE OBTAINED DATA WILL BE ANALYZED BY USING FOLLOWING VARIOUS STATISTICAL
TOOLS: -
• 1. PERCENTAGE
• 2. MEAN
• 3. STANDARD DEVIATION
• 4. T-TEST
6. Count of Srl.no Column Labels
Row Labels 1 2 1-50,2-50 Grand Total
1 1 1 2
1 1 1
2 1 1
2 38 37 75
2 3 1 4
3 34 36 70
4 1 1
3 11 12 23
3 8 10 18
4 3 2 5
1=2,2=75,3=23
1=1,2=5,3=88,4=6
Grand Total 50 50 100
According to the age factor, 2 were of 14-17, 75 were of 18-21, and
23 were 22-25years of age.
According to Education factor where 1 up to high school, 5 up to
intermediate, 88 up to graduate and 6 were above graduate.
According to the institute 50 were from St. Paul’s and 50 were from
St. Conrad’s.
7. ROW LABELS CONSIST 1,2&3 IN BOLD SHOW THE AGE GROUPS OF STUDENTS.
1,2,3&4 IS TO REPRESENT THEIR EDUCATION STATUS.
AGE.
• 14-17
• 18-21
• 22-25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1
2
2
3
4
3
4
1=1,2=5,3=88,4=6
1 2 3 1=2,2=75,3=23
1
2
1-50,2-50
Column labels
consist of 1&2,
Institute.
1- Represent St.
Paul’s institute,
2- Represent St.
Conrad’s institute.
Education.
1-Up to High school
2-Up to Intermediate
3-Up to Graduation
4-Above Graduation
9. GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF
ABOVE MEANS SCORES:
1.32
1.18
1.05
1.07
1.32
1.23
1
1.07
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Cultural Activity
Physical Training
Social
GK
Chart Title
Series 2 Series 1
1.17
1.09
1.06
1.22
1.18
1.04
1.03
1.02
0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25
Software & IT
Reasoning
Mathematics
litrary activity
Chart Title
Series 2 Series 1
10. RESULT:
• IT HAS BEEN FOUND THAT THE DIFFERENT INSTITUTE HAVE DIFFERENT
TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION HELPS US
TO FIND THAT AT MANY POINT INSTITUTE 1 WHICH IS ST. PAUL’S STUDENT
PARTICIPATE IN MORE TALENT ACTIVITIES AND IN SOME POINTS INSTITUTE 2
WHICH CONRAD’S STUDENT HAVE MORE TALENT ACTIVITIES.
11. REASONS AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
• THE DERIVED RESULTS SHOW THAT EACH OF THE INSTITUTE HAVE GOOD TALENT MANAGEMENT
OPPORTUNITIES. THE T-TEST HELPS US TO FIND THAT STUDENTS OF INSTITUTE 1 EXCEL IN LITERARY
ACTIVITY WHICH MEANS INSTITUTE 1 ST. PAUL’S IS GOOD IN ACADEMICS AND HAVE BETTER TALENT
NURTURING OVER INSTITUTE 2 WHICH IS ST. CONRAD’S. MATHEMATICS HAS ALSO GOT MORE SCORE OF
INSTITUTE 1 OVER INSTITUTE 2. REASONING AND SOCIAL INSTITUTE 1 SHOWS THAT IT EXCELS OVER
INSTITUTE 2 WHICH MEANS ST. PAUL’S HAS BETTER TRAINING FOR MATH’S, REASONING AND SOCIAL
ACTIVITY. THIS CONFIRMS ST. PAUL’S HAS BETTER MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THESE ACTIVITIES.
• SOFTWARE & IT AND PHYSICAL TRAINING WITH THE HELP OF T-TEST WE ARE ABLE TO INTERPRET THAT
INSTITUTE 2 WHICH IS ST. CANARDS EXCEL OVER INSTITUTE 1 WHICH IS ST. PAUL’S. THE TALENT
MANAGEMENT IN THESE FIELD IS MORE DEVELOPED OR HAS BETTER OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENT TO
NURTURE THEIR TALENT.
• GK. & CULTURAL ACTIVITY INTERPRETING FROM THE T-TEST SCORE IT’S FOUND THAT THESE ACTIVITIES
HAVE EQUAL MEAN AND T VALUE WHICH INTERPRETS THAT THE BOTH INSTITUTE HAVE SAME TALENT
MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE STUDENT WHICH MEANS THEY HAVE SIMILAR OR EQUAL ACTIVITY
WHICH HELP THEM TO NURTURE.
12. HOW OFTEN DO YOU HAVE THESE
ACTIVITIES IN YOUR INSTITUTE?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Institute 1 Institute 2
frequency of activities
monthly weekly annualy
13. DO YOU FIND THESE ACTIVITIES IDENTIFY
YOUR TALENT?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Institute 1 Institute 2
Question B
Series 1 Series 2 Series 3
14. DO YOU GET GUIDANCE AND MENTORING TO
IMPROVE THESE TALENTS/SKILLS?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Institute 1 Institute 2
Question C
yes Somewhat No
15. ARE YOU SATISFIED BY THESE ACTIVITIES
AT YOUR COLLEGE OR SCHOOLS?
0
5
10
15
20
25
Institute 1 Institute 2
Question D
Yes Somewhat No
17. •IT WAS FOUND INSTITUTE OF AGRA GIVE MORE FOCUS LITERARY
ACTIVITIES IN TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
•IN THE STUDY IT WAS FOUND TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
LIKE CULTURAL ACTIVITIES, SOFTWARE & IT, REASONING, G.K.,
PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES AND MATHEMATICS ARE CONDUCTED TO
NURTURE THE YOUNG TALENTS.
•IT WAS ALSO FOUND IN THE STUDY THE INSTITUTES WERE
LACKING BEHIND IN SOCIAL ACTIVITIES LIKE SOCIAL EVENTS AND
SOCIAL VOLUNTEERING WHICH IS ALSO PART TALENT
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
18. •ST. PAUL’S HAVE BETTER TALENT MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
THAN ST. CONRAD’S IN LITERARY ACTIVITIES, MATHEMATICS
ACTIVITIES, REASONING ACTIVITIES AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES.
•ST. CANARDS HAVE BETTER TALENT MANAGEMENT
OPPORTUNITIES THAN ST. PAUL’S IN SOFTWARE & IT AND
PHYSICAL TRAINING.
•GK. & CULTURAL ACTIVITY WE FOUND THAT BOTH INSTITUTE
HAVE SAME TALENT MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE
STUDENT WHICH MEANS THEY HAVE SIMILAR OR EQUAL ACTIVITY
WHICH HELP THEM TO NURTURE.
19. CONCLUSIONS OF THE STUDY
The conclusion which were drawn on the basis of findings are
stated as follows-
Since talent management practices plays an important part in our
careers. St. Paul’s has better talent management opportunities
and nurturing in comparison to St. Conrad's.
Concluding that institutes of agra have good talent management
practices but there is a room for development. institute of agra
should work on talent management opportunities and should give
proper nurturing to students.
20. LIMITATIONS OF THE PRESENT STUDY ARE
AS FOLLOWS-
• THE STUDY HAS BEEN CONFINED TO AGRA CITY THE SAMPLE OF THE STUDY
HAS BEEN COLLECTED FROM STUDENTS OF 2 CO-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTES.
• THE SAMPLE SIZE WAS LIMITED TO 100 RESPONDENTS ONLY.
• THE SCHOOL WHICH COMPRISES ONLY BOYS OR ONLY GIRLS WERE
EXCLUDED AS THE DATA MAY BE PARTIAL OR INAPPROPRIATE FOR
RESEARCH PURPOSE.
• SOME STUDENTS WERE INTROVERT/SHY SO THEY DIDN’T TAKE INTEREST IN
FILLING THE QUESTIONNAIRE.
