Organization change management

Organisational Change Management 1
ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT
by Student’s Name
The Name of the Class (Course)
Professor
The Name of the School (University)
The Date

Introduction
In a growing dynamism and competition climate, a company's ability to alter and adapt is
more crucial than ever. Some businesses such as Google, Apple, and Toyota succeed in thriving
despite such difficult conditions. In this instance, the distinctive feature in business change
management is usually seen as new technology, shattered organizational boundaries, and a more
international workforce. Corporate modifications are made to enhance the functioning of the
company or department. There is no reason for change except to improve the operation of the
company (Evans, 2020, 1). A lot of research is thus required before it starts. Corporate adjustments
occur, notably when an institution amends its overall strategy for success and removes the primary
practice or department, adds, or tries to improve. It also occurs when an institution passes through
various stages of its life. In a company in multiple stages of development, there must be many
changes. Managers often attempt to meet their job needs. The only continuous change that does
not adapt or manage the changing process in the organization may damage or degrade the
company's performance, Businesses must thus underline the efficiency and sustainability of
change management (Lyons, 2018, 9).
Need For a Strategy
Big businesses are better than rivals and are the next step to benefit from every employee
than from companies. You affect your company successfully. Fewer companies still view their
businesses as strategic since institutes influence the significance of the company nowadays as a
potential and performance. Today, companies are not ready to provide tomorrow's anticipated
business outcomes (Bailey, 2020, 126). Various amendments are necessary to guarantee the
complete achievement of the strategic goal. Alas, many companies translate their company goals
into concrete and practical strategies, but institutional requirements for the system are seldom strict

at the same level. An efficient corporate approach enables an enterprise to communicate its strategy
(Arnold, 2020, 115). The organization's process demonstrates the significance of a business
transformation and provides a transition strategy and a realistic plan.
Causes of Organizational Change
The technology used in businesses is often upgraded over time. It implies that an enterprise
must be open to the innovation of technology. The skills of employees must also be improved with
technological progress (Lewis et al, 2020, 13). Non-changing organizations will be less frequent
in the next several years. Corporate modifications are made to enhance the functioning of the
company or department. There is no reason for change except to improve the operation of the
company. A lot of research is thus required before it starts. Corporate adjustments occur, notably
when an institution amends its overall strategy for success and removes the primary practice or
department, ads, or tries to improve (Camino, 2020, 2). It also occurs when an institution passes
through various stages of its life. Managers often attempt to meet their job needs.
External Analysis
Without the influence of other organizations, no organization can exist. It needs to deal
with consumers, stakeholders, public officials, suppliers, and syndicates all the time. In any
corporate setting, each organization has duties and goals related to each other (Alani, 2018, 1163).
The social, cultural, political, environmental, technical, competitive, and international market
variables encompass other aspects of the transition as stated above. Changes in economic control,
labor relations, production processes, and competitiveness may change organizations. Due to
globalization, technology is changing with time. When technology changes little, firms decrease
costs and reduce their competitiveness. The new technology must be implemented and used by

these businesses. The purchase of new software is necessary, which affects the company's
operation. With any business exporting its goods, it is competitive globally. Many factors may
influence the competitive position of one industry – other companies provide the same products,
and customers do not buy the product. Several liberalized economy multinationals are on the
market. Organizations must reorganize to meet the changing circumstances. Demand for goods
and services is constantly shifting for buyers on the market (Scotland, 2017, 1). To satisfy the
consumers' needs, companies must thus alter their interests. Due to their methods, expectations,
and objectives, social and cultural changes are apparent in daily life. Moreover, they influence
employee behavior in enterprises because of different backgrounds in education, development,
autonomy, and globalization. Adjustments to particular tones are thus necessary. Legal and
political issues significantly influence an Organization's operations and the techniques used to
accomplish these objectives. Therefore, changes to these factors may affect the running business.
Internal Evaluation
Adjustments in the internal components of an organization may need modifications. These
adjustments are required since managers have changed and company traditions are lacking.
Continuous change, cancelations, promotions, or transfers are subject to administration. As he
knows best, every leader works. When a new leader is selected, he adopts his own opinions. Staff
- Managerial changes are often due to management shifts (Rosenbaum, 2018, 1). Furthermore,
even when no change obliges the business to adjust, employees will modify their operating views
(Aguinis, 2019, 127).The employee's nature develops over time. The current generation of
employees is highly educated and concentrates on their own beliefs and even their management.
Their behavior is highly complex, making business success difficult for managers. An essential
aspect of domestic transformation is the stability of a business. If a company has financial

problems, it must evaluate all prospects of the organization's existence. These alternatives may
include transactions reduction, the abolition of non-profits, and operating costs reduction. Reduced
expenditure may also reduce the number of employees. Downsizing staff often has many problems
that may lead to employee’s strikes. Management is often confronted with challenging times since
the actions are ambiguous.
Stakeholder Analysis and Management
The analysis of stakeholders is not easy. The leader decides which applications of the
stakeholders may be impacted or influenced. Stakeholders may oppose organizational changes or
control them. In the interests of the parties concerned are both the financial advantages and the
management of a business (Holmes, 2017, 35). A method that can be best supported is needed to
assess the various interests of a participating organization. Stakeholder analysis involves
stakeholders to ensure more effective programs and services at all levels of organizational
transformation.The interest and priority application process also enables interested parties to
satisfy requests from parties concerned and supports behavior modification at the early phases of
monitoring and assessment. Stakeholder engagement and responsibility provide an opportunity to
assess, persuade and learn the hypotheses and alternatives. Changes are also better welcomed. The
same market groupings may generate rivalry. To get market share in particular sectors, companies
employ promotional techniques, promises, and pricing contests (Albort-Morant, 2018, 189). The
rivalry may frequently contribute to the sluggish development of companies, in particular price
cuts and significant stakeholders—modifications to provide any company a competitive
advantage. A group of companies strengthens suppliers since no alternative is available. The
organization does not control these consequences. Buyers can reduce their costs and require goods

and services of improved quality. As a result, buyers are more substantial; buyers are more
interested in goods and services, shifting costs are decreased, suppliers are reduced, prices and
demand, and transparency in pricing. The buyer's negotiated power depends on a company's time
and competitive strategy. The hazards faced by new applicants include conversion costs, diversity
of products, regulatory restrictions, and financial requirements. In addition, challenges, including
technology, employment, and strategic business plan, maybe anticipated in new organizations.
Driving and Restraining Forces
The drivers assist the process of change. It helps to alter people and motivates them to
change and modify the equilibrium. On the other hand, restrictive forces oppose the forces of push.
They hinder people from changing via change prevention (Stern, 2019, 42). They thus produce a
balance shift that will resist the effort to change.
Passive Resistance
It is a method of protest that is not violently altering the law. It encompasses boycotts,
strikes, and demonstrations. Passive resistance comprises characteristics such as reservations and
concerns about change management (Kasayanond, 2019, 345). A severe matter must be
investigated and addressed. It may reduce the pace of learning for the whole company and adapt
to change management techniques.
Aggressive Resistance
Fierce resistance is seen in hostile behavior. It may be characterized as a personality
disorder by negative attitudes and working conditions (Sjøtun, 2020, 113). The delay, difficulty,
and desire to do activities show such resistance.

Embracing Change
The change-making workers and firms are better than those who finally embrace change.
Changes are often so complex that they may be resisted from time to time. The process of change
needs vision and determination (Lopes, 2012, 64). During the change process, motivators and
training are necessary. The environment should be transforming enough.
SWOT Analysis
The SWOT examines external dangers and options to determine the internal flaws and
stability of an organization (Jiskani, 2020, 13). It is a vital tool to prepare an institution's
evaluation. The concept is that managers may use it to ensure the business's success for the proper
strategy. The strength of an enterprise is significant since it provides a competitive advantage to
rival companies. As a result, the firm is positioned well on the market. Organizations must ensure
that they do not harm their strengths throughout the implementation of reforms. An organization,
on the other hand, threatens a weakness. For the company, this represents a competitive
disadvantage. Weaknesses need to be handled carefully since they may lead to the collapse of
organizations. Vision problems, poor eyesight, lack of technology and facilities may also include
inadequate employee enthusiasm. (Akan, 2016, 59)An organization should ensure that any
changes do not improve the organization's vulnerabilities. If differences are not minimized,
vulnerabilities should permanently be removed. It would likely benefit an organization from
circumstances that can be utilized for good ends. The outside environment often provides
possibilities for the company to use.

It may lead to positive environmental improvements or the capacity of the government to
adapt to the outside world. Improved technology, vertical integration, and strong economies may
include some instances (Islam, 2012, 237). Leaders should ensure that any adjustments made
enhance the company's potential. The effects of the organization are not entirely beneficia l.
Companies may also be at risk of developing externally. Leaders should be in a position to
anticipate the dangers and modifications which may prevent the hazard. The new regulations,
economic downturns, and cheaper methods include certain risks. Corporate changes should not
aggravate the effect of such risks and contribute to them.
Formation of a Strong Coalition
People need to be convinced of the necessity for change. It requires good management and
strong support from the top management of the business (Rønningstad, 2018, 21). Change should
not only be noticed but should also be preserved. It needs a coalition to persuade employees from
many sources of influence, including political significance, status, and skill. The alliance should
function as a team and stress the need for change as a need and strength. To build a coalition, it is
necessary to acknowledge and encourage leaders emotionally. Team building also has to be
reinforced in the alliance(Kananura et al, 2012, 27). The team must discover weak areas and fill
them. Different employees from different departments and levels should also be involved.

Develop a Vision for Change
The firm must be aware of its present position and what it wants to accomplish before a
vision comes into being. When an image is clear, staff understand why and how important it is.
When workers understand how the change is being made, they recognize and accept the rationale
for the difference (Muller, 2020, 3). First of all, it is necessary to search for the most basic
principles and convey expectations of future transformation. Next, the vision should be realized
by drawing out a plan. Finally, the alliance created generally should comprehend and exercise the
imagination.
Communicating the Vision
Following its creation, communicating the vision is highly essential. It has to be transmitted
often and vigorously to improve eyesight. It should be inclined to do everything in the business.
Not just at meetings, the vision must be conveyed but continuously (Kimora, 2019, 1). It should
also be used for organizational management and decision-making. Managers should stress this in
the mindset of each employee.
Do Away With Obstacles
Staff will focus on the changes in the stages above. While this is all happening,
management should guarantee that the process of transformation is not obstructed. The removal of
barriers may help workers achieve and make the transformation progress (Fyshchuk, 2019, 592).
Types of Change
Three transformations are connected. The primary transformation is driven by ability,
compliance, and convictions. Next, leaders develop and reveal the change and try to get their

workers to embrace it for the emotional enjoyment of their company. Finally, the changes lead to
a rapid and significant alteration of the institutions (Cuevas, 2018, 200).Since the organization,
wherever the intended change occurs, is backed from above. Change leaders and initiators attempt
to use specific research and experience methods to reduce resistance and productivity loss of
change and sustain change. The modifications suggested do not lead to a change but instead to a
change process. It attempts to engage people, identify and assist critical players in shaping and
implementing the change. Another kind of transition thoroughly guides change. For example,
employee loyalty depends on your contribution to the goal (Lang, 2020, 6).The interactive process
of prior knowledge, preparation, performance and improvisation, information sharing, and
ongoing redesign and restoration, where required, is a leading transformation. This training
improves ongoing efforts for change and the ability to produce new modifications and solutions
constantly.All these changes have a good and bad effects. If changes are made unsuccessfully,
staff must be informed of the recipients. The answers are cold, loss, refusal, negotiation, and truth.
Due to its partnerships and efficiency, the anticipated modifications in the current organizations
may lead to substantial productivity and personnel reduction by separating the main stakeholders.
If the shift situation is not particularly flexible, the change envisaged will be brief as well. Planned
changes may restrict the company's capacity to achieve its objectives. Furthermore, management
continues to confront the challenge of starting and maintaining changes from detecting changes
through the generation of the desired outcomes and possible adjustments ((Mitchell, 2021, 222).
Undermined changes may lead to organizational issues since constant changes and modifications
generate confusion among workers and other significant stakeholders rather than illumination.

Driving Forces of Change and Resistors to Change
The driving force should be greater than preventive if changes take place. Many employees
oppose any change. Managers should be able to address and take account of their problems and
recommendations. If the opposes are aware of their concerns, they will also voice their opinions.
To execute a significant change, a leadership position is necessary (Berwick, 2020, 225). The
leader must design, train, advise, monitor, reward, and report a plan. It provides the leader the
chance to explain why this move will benefit employees. The launch event is significant. The
leader also has to identify and clarify the critical questions posed by the change. It should be an
incredible and inspiring opportunity. Shirts and souvenirs may make a difference (Majumdar,
2021, 4).Management efforts and employees to be rewarded and recognized. It provides
motivation and motivates people to continue working and developing. Progress reports inform
people about the process of change. The manager should often meet the management on urgent
subjects. Institutionalization should absorb changes in the organization's strategy, job descriptions,
and procedures. Corporate infrastructure must be in a position to sustain the new changes to make
the changeover permanent. The upgrade of the manuals and systems continues to incorporate this
modification. It's not simple to change your company. At this moment, the role of leadership is
essential, and the project manager and the employees must grasp the performance and
commitment.
Cost of Change
There is little chance to make a change when this is very costly. Easy to execute cheap
changes with a significant effect (Bekmukhambetova, 2021, 3). Change calls for training.
Education, especially for the whole business, is not affordable. They may require instruction or

training for one week before the modification is fully implemented. Work changes can also be
quite expensive. Interviewing and attracting new employees is likewise very costly.
Resistance to Change
Various methods for handling reservations of change are available. Education and
communication help us realize the need for change. Personnel must listen to their leaders and
follow their instructions with confidence. The whole organization involves participation and
engagement (Seder, 2021, 69). This process of change is unlikely to be opposed by workers. On
the contrary, participation contributes to improving and modifying the cause. Leaders need to be
encouraged and supported. It means that workers may express their opinions and transparently use
their thinking. You should provide your employees a comfortable and enjoyable work
environment. It is advisable to train if required. Co-operative employee development and
recognition need leadership. Specify more excellent wages and incentives. When manipulation
occurs, the choosing of persons to receive, provide, be accurate, and spread the news improves the
possibility of successful change. Cooptation plays an integral part in the process of transformation.
The leaders' recommendations need to be supported. Manipulation and cooperation are not
expensive, and change may be manipulated (Podsakoff, 2019, 33). However, workers may fail if
such techniques are proven incorrect and so lose the trust of superiors.
Assessment
Benchmarking uses the information to produce performance indicators from the leading
enterprises of competing businesses in the industry (Gonzalez et al, 2017, 560) . The use of industry
benchmarking and consumer consciousness-based information may assist in altering the business.
Before comparison starts, the target clients must be chosen to clarify their specific requirements.

It also contributes to creating new industries and reaching customers within the firm (Valdo’s,
2019, 241). Categorize drivers of the current business for every product and service area. For
example, it may be the primary motivation for companies to control operating expenses properly.
The media, the government, or the online are available. The organization's performance compared
to the business chosen. In contrast to business norms, the transaction should present organizational,
financial, and production difficulties.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is the necessity of managing and managing changes, particularly their
intrinsically harsh and chaotic character. The resistance to change stated above is a natural reaction
to change and is often encouraged by an organizational inclination to return to the status quo. In
the light of the examples, while changes are not simple, it's a highly anticipated element of any
organization's lives. Therefore, organizations need to be adjusted as slowly and continuously as
feasible to confront progressively growing dynamism and upheavals in the present economic
climate.

References
Akan, B., Ulcer, F.E. and Unser, A.S., 2016. The effect of organizational communication towards
resistance to change: A case study in banking sector. Economic Review: Journal of
Economics and Business, 14(1), pp.53-67.
Alani, M., Salonitis, K. and Tsinopoulos, C., 2018. A conceptual lean implementation framework
based on change management theory. Procedia cirp, 72, pp.1160-1165.
Arnold, M., 2020. Change Management Education in Social Work Degree Programmes in
Germany: Bridging the Gap Between Management Science and Professional Practice. In
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Work Education (pp. 101-117). Palgrave
Macmillan, Cham.
Bailey, J. and Drew, E., 2020. Change management to initiate and accelerate gender equality. In
The Gender-Sensitive University (pp. 124-139). Routledge.
Bekmukhambetova, A., 2021. Comparative Analysis of Change Management Models Based on an
Exploratory Literature Review.
Berwick, D.M., 2020. The moral determinants of health. Jama, 324(3), pp.225-226.
Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M. and Pinto, R., 2020. How do industry 4.0
technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
Cuevas, J.M., 2018. The transformation of professional selling: Implications for leading the
modern sales organization. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, pp.198-208.

Evans, T.R., 2020. Improving evidence quality for organisational change management through
open science. Journal of Organizational Change Management.
Fyshchuk, I., Giese, R. and Tussupova, L., 2019. Change Management Process Through Tourism
In Finance Aspects According To The Transnational Project As The New Silk Road. Public
Administration and Regional Development, (5), pp.581-601.
Gonzalez, E., Nanos, E.M., Seyr, H., Valldecabres, L., Yürüşen, N.Y., Smolka, U., Muskulus, M.
and Melero, J.J., 2017. Key performance indicators for wind farm operation and
maintenance. Energy Procedia, 137, pp.559-570.
Holmes, J., 2017. Leadership and change management: examining gender, cultural and ‘hero
leader’stereotypes. In Challenging leadership stereotypes through discourse (pp. 15-43).
Springer, Singapore.
Islam, M.A., Ali, A.J. and Wafi, S.M., 2012. Resistance to change among first line managers in
multinational organizations in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research
Papers, 6(4), pp.232-245.
Jiskani, I.M., Shah, S.A.A., Qingxiang, C., Zhou, W. and Lu, X., 2020. A multi-criteria based
SWOT analysis of sustainable planning for mining and mineral industry in Pakistan.
Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13(21), pp.1-16.
Kananura, R.M., Ekirapa-Kiracho, E., Paina, L., Bumba, A., Mulekwa, G., Nakiganda-Busiku, D.,
Oo, H.N.L., Kiwanuka, S.N., George, A. and Peters, D.H., 2017. Participatory monitoring
and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and
newborn study in Eastern Uganda. Health research policy and systems, 15(2), pp.55-68.

Kasayanond, A., 2019. Environmental sustainability and its growth in Malaysia by elaborating the
green economy and environmental efficiency. 670216917.
Klimova, A.S., 2019. Theoretical aspects of resistance to change.
Lang, K.R., 2020. Key Aspects of Successful Change Management (Doctoral dissertation, Cleary
University).
Leal-Rodríguez, A.L., Ariza-Montes, A.J., Morales-Fernández, E. and Albort-Morant, G., 2018.
Green innovation, indeed a cornerstone in linking market requests and business
performance. Evidence from the Spanish automotive components industry. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 129, pp.185-193.
Lewis, M.A., Schweitzer, J., Cunningham, R. and Jacobs, B., 2020. Navigating complex
organisational change: putting sustainable transitions theory to practice. In ISPIM
Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-16). The International Society for Professional Innovation
Management (ISPIM).
Lopes, I.T., 2012. Monitoring the Sustainable Development Performance: an integrated approach
to business management. Contemporary challenges in the process of management in
organization of the future, pp.59-73.
Lyons, G., 2018. Getting smart about urban mobility–aligning the paradigms of smart and
sustainable. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, pp.4-14.
Majumdar, A., Sinha, S.K. and Govindan, K., 2021. Prioritising Risk Mitigation Strategies for
Environmentally Sustainable Clothing Supply Chains: Insights from Selected
Organisational Theories. Sustainable Production and Consumption.

Mitchell, T.L., 2021. The United States civil engineer transformation initiative: A case study of
successfully leading CRE organisational change management. Corporate Real Estate
Journal, 10(2), pp.216-229.
Muller, G., 2020. Change Management; Introducing Systems Architecting Aspects.
Ng, T.W., Yam, K.C. and Aguinis, H., 2019. Employee perceptions of corporate social
responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 72(1),
pp.107-137.
Podsakoff, P.M. and Podsakoff, N.P., 2019. Experimental designs in management and leadership
research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The
Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), pp.11-33.
Rønningstad, C., 2018. Us and them–First-line management and change resistance.
Rosenbaum, D., More, E. and Steane, P., 2018. Planned organisational change management:
Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. Journal of Organizational Change
Management.
Sedej, T., 2021. The change management process in the contemporary environment. International
Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 7(1), pp.66-78.
Sjøtun, S.G., 2020. The role of engineers in the greening of the South-Western Norwegian
Maritime Industry: Practices, agency and social fields. Geoforum, 113, pp.111-120.
Skogland, M.A.C. and Hansen, G.K., 2017. Change your space, change your culture: exploring
spatial change management strategies. Journal of Corporate Real Estate.

Stern, N., 2019. Sustainability and internationalism: driving development in the 21st century.
Policy Insight, London: Grantham Research Institute and Centre for Climate Change
Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Vlados, C., 2019. Change management and innovation in the “living organization”: The Stra. Tech.
Man approach. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(2), pp.229-256.

Organization change management

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Organization change management

Similar to Organization change management (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Organization change management