tell. Why September the 26th, I don't have a good picture, but I know for the first half the intelligence was saying it's gonna be a long war. He decided then to do it, and he had set it up so he could just say yes and a day later would blow away. You said it and say work by sonars. Frequency, you can blow them up, you can do it. So tough thing to do. And so why at that point, whether he was deciding is this is going to be a long war, it's going to cost a lot of money. I'm going to go all the way. He's now moving a lot of American troops and equipment into Poland. I don't know if he's going to commit native to it. I don't know if NATO wants to go, but he basically gave Chancellor Schultz, took away the option of Schultz to say I'm going to stop giving them arms. Winter's coming. I want that pipeline. I want to keep my people warm and wealthy. So he blew it up. So there's been a lot of news reporting, a lot of interest on this very simple question. Who blew up the North Stream pipelines? Remember in September of last year, the North Stream One and N Stream Two, which are two parallelly running pipelines carrying natural gas from Russia to Germany, were blown up. There were massive explosions which happened 250 feet are below the sea. Now the first report that came out, which was last month by a famous American journalist, which seemed to suggest that this was an inside job, it was carried out by the United States using state actors. now just this past week there's been some follow up reporting September the 26th last year and. I there was no way. Common sense. You have to deal with common sense. Well, let's see. I knew that no Russia would have done it because of Putin already had responded. There's two major pipelines, N Stream one, which has been alive for since 2011, and Nord Stream two, which is. These are huge. They moved millions of whatever the measurement is of natural gas. There is a different measurement and it's not cubic feet, it's they they they move in, they mouth stream one turn Germany because they supplied cheap natural gas. That was very clear. Then they needed it anyway. I'm just giving you all this because I'm not here. I can answer your question, but I be coming from the blue one. I don't want to come from the blue. I want people to understand I've done this a long time. So the White House, Mr. Hush, they have rejected your story outright. They've called it a figment of your imagination. More fiction than fact is the wording that they used. Germany has also taken a very cautious mind on your story. You referred before in your first answer to Western media like the New York Times, The Washington Post. Had you taken your story to the editors there, would they have published such a consequential story basis, Just one single, unnamed anonymous source? How would you react to that? This source? Would I the way described the story and the intent of how I sourced it? Was to be as as vague as possible. It would have been very

1. PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
To:
Name and mailing address of the ISA/ Authorized officer
Facsimile No. Telephone No.
Form PCT/ISA/237 (cover sheet) (July 2022)
PCT
Date of mailing
(day/month/year)
Applicant’s or agent’s file reference
International application No. International filing date (day/month/year) Priority date (day/month/year)
From the
INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
See paragraph 2 below
WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
(PCT Rule 43bis.1)
International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
Applicant
1. This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
Box No. I Basis of the opinion
Box No. II Priority
Box No. III Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
Box No. IV Lack of unity of invention
Box No. V Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability;
citations and explanations supporting such statement
Box No. VI Certain documents cited
Box No. VII Certain defects in the international application
Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
2. FURTHER ACTION
If a demand for international preliminary examination is made, this opinion will be considered to be a written opinion of the
International Preliminary Examining Authority (“IPEA”) except that this does not apply where the applicant chooses an Authority
other than this one to be the IPEA and the chosen IPEA has notified the International Bureau under Rule 66.1bis(b) that written
opinions of this International Searching Authority will not be so considered.
If this opinion is, as provided above, considered to be a written opinion of the IPEA, the applicant is invited to submit to the IPEA
a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments, before the expiration of 3 months from the date of mailing of Form
PCT/ISA/220 or before the expiration of 22 months from the priority date, whichever expires later.
For further options, see Form PCT/ISA/220.
FOR FURTHER ACTION
Date of completion of this opinion
KHASTGIR, PRITY TECH CORP
INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIST (TCIS)
C/C3A/436, JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-
110058 INDIA
17-04-2023
PK-101-KOL
PCT/IN2023/050082 26-01-2023 29-01-2022
H04L67/04 Version=2023.01
HURREY TECH VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
Indian Patent Office
Plot No. 32, Sector 14,
Dwarka,New Delhi-110075
17-04-2023 Ranjan Biswas
+91-1125300200

2. WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
International application No.
Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. I) (July 2022)
Box No. I Basis of this opinion
1. With regard to the language, this opinion has been established on the basis of:
the international application in the language in which it was filed.
a translation of the international application into ___________________________ which is the language of a translation
furnished for the purposes of international search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1(b)).
2. This opinion has been established taking into account the rectification of an obvious mistake authorized by or notified to
this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43bis.1(b)).
3. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, this opinion has been
established on the basis of a sequence listing:
a. forming part of the international application as filed.
b. furnished subsequent to the international filing date for the purposes of international search (Rule 13ter.1(a)),
accompanied by a statement to the effect that the sequence listing does not go beyond the disclosure in the
international application as filed.
4. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, this opinion has been
established to the extent that a meaningful opinion could be formed without a WIPO Standard ST.26 compliant sequence
listing.
5. Additional comments:
PCT/IN2023/050082

3. International application No.
Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. V) (July 2022)
Box No. V Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability;
citations and explanations supporting such statement
1. Statement
Novelty (N) Claims ______________________________________________________ YES
Claims ______________________________________________________ NO
Inventive step (IS) Claims ______________________________________________________ YES
Claims ______________________________________________________ NO
Industrial applicability (IA) Claims ______________________________________________________ YES
Claims ______________________________________________________ NO
2. Citations and explanations:
WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY PCT/IN2023/050082
1-12
1-12
1-12
Reference is made to the following document:
D1: US 20120096121 A1 (VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC) 19
April 2012 (19.04.2012).
Novelty:
The subject matter of claims 1-12 does not have Novelty in the
sense of Article 33(2) of PCT because Claimed features are
disclosed in D1.
Regarding independent claim 1, document D1 discloses (the
references in parentheses applying to this document): a method for
communicating streaming data to provide casting content, said
method comprising the steps of: communicating a request to a server
via at least one client device to process said streaming
data in a first protocol (Claim 1:”… receiving, by a server device
and from a user device, a request for content from a home network,
where the request originates via a wireless access network…”);
processing by said server of an Internet of Things (IoT) device a
data file received via first protocol to retrieve at least one data
parameter selected from a presentation description file,
encoding, language, RTSP URLs, destination address, port, and other
parameters (Paragraph [0039]:”… Resource identifier 370 may
include, for example, a uniform resource identifier (URI), an IP
address, a private network address, or other indicator, to enable
user device 110-1 generate a request to CDN 160 to obtain the
requested content. User device 110-1 may receive resource

4. International application No.
Form PCT/ISA/237 (Box No. VII) (July 2022)
Box No. VII Certain defects in the international application
The following defects in the form or contents of the international application have been noted:
WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY PCT/IN2023/050082
1. Reference numerals should be put in the claims (PCT Regulations
6.2(b)) and abstract (PCT Regulations 8.1(d)) to enhance clarity.

5. International application No.
Supplemental Box
Form PCT/ISA/237 (Supplemental Box) (July 2022)
WRITTEN OPINION OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
In case the space in any of the preceding boxes is not sufficient.
Continuation of:
PCT/IN2023/050082
Continuation of Citation and Explanation(Box5)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
identifier 370, and may send, over a private network connection, a
request for the desired content, as indicated by reference number
380. User device 110-1 may receive the desired content over the
private network connection, as further indicated by reference
number 380 …”); creating a message based on received data file
information and generating a hash of said received data file
information by said server includes applying a hash function to
electronic data of said data file; allowing verification of a valid
client based on decoding hash value; authenticating incoming
request of data file and returning response of said authentication
to said client device in said first protocol; obtaining by said IoT
device said received data file via a high-definition multimedia
interface (HDMI) output interface (Paragraph [0035]:”…
user device 110-1 to send a request 310, to mobile server 120, for
content stored within a home network (e.g., on or accessible to STB
152). In one implementation, user device 110-1 may communicate
with mobile server 120 through a hypertext transfer protocol over
secure socket (HTTPS) layer using network 170 (not shown). Request
for content 310 may include, for example, an operation command
(e.g., a “get_content” command), credentials associated with user
device 110-1 (e.g., a mobile directory number (MDN) and/or a
personal access code for the STB associated with the requested
content), an identifier (e.g., a unique device number) for the STB
associated with the requested content, a region identifier, and/or
other information to facilitate a content request transaction…”);
and displaying said request in a connected display device and
communicating data file to be displayed on said connected display
device via a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) input
interface, wherein said high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI)
input interface of said connected display device obtain data
file from said IoT device (Paragraph [0022]:”… STB 152 may
receive data, such as a video signal, may convert the video signal
to a form usable by an output device (e.g., a television), and may
transmit the converted video signal to the output device for
display...”); wherein said data file comprises a data file having a
data form selected from a plurality of data forms comprising
audio data, video data, image data, and document data; and wherein
said first protocol is configured to cast specific content on UI of
said connected display device without compromising with user
privacy (Paragraph [0037]:”… The user may select an item from the
list of available content and user device 110-1 may forward, to
mobile server 120, the selection as content selection 340. Content
selection 340 may include, for example, a title or other identifier
for the selected content. In one implementation, content
selection 340 may also include a delivery format for the
selected content. In another implementation, content selection 340
may include instructions to deliver real-time content or perform a
recording of future content. Mobile server 120 may receive content
selection 340 and may forward content selection 340 to STB server
140, which, in turn, may forward content selection 340 to STB
152…”).

6. WRITTEN OPINION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
All technical features of claim 1 are thus disclosed by document
D1. Thus, the subject matter of claim 1 lacks novelty.
A similar argument applies, mutatis mutandis, to related
independent claim 9. Hence, claim 9 also lacks novelty.
None of the dependent claims contains additional features that lead
to subject matter that involves novelty in view of the
disclosure of D1.
Inventive Step:
The subject matter of claims 1-12 does not have an inventive Step
in the sense of Article 33(3) of PCT because claimed features are
disclosed in D1, as discussed above in novelty consideration.
Industrial Applicability:
The subject matter of claims 1-12 is considered to be industrially
applicable and thus complies with the requirements of Article 33(4)
of PCT.
Form PCT/ISA/237 (supplemental sheet 2)