tell. Why September the 26th, I don't have a good picture, but I know for the first half the intelligence was saying it's gonna be a long war. He decided then to do it, and he had set it up so he could just say yes and a day later would blow away. You said it and say work by sonars. Frequency, you can blow them up, you can do it. So tough thing to do. And so why at that point, whether he was deciding is this is going to be a long war, it's going to cost a lot of money. I'm going to go all the way. He's now moving a lot of American troops and equipment into Poland. I don't know if he's going to commit native to it. I don't know if NATO wants to go, but he basically gave Chancellor Schultz, took away the option of Schultz to say I'm going to stop giving them arms. Winter's coming. I want that pipeline. I want to keep my people warm and wealthy. So he blew it up. So there's been a lot of news reporting, a lot of interest on this very simple question. Who blew up the North Stream pipelines? Remember in September of last year, the North Stream One and N Stream Two, which are two parallelly running pipelines carrying natural gas from Russia to Germany, were blown up. There were massive explosions which happened 250 feet are below the sea. Now the first report that came out, which was last month by a famous American journalist, which seemed to suggest that this was an inside job, it was carried out by the United States using state actors. now just this past week there's been some follow up reporting September the 26th last year and. I there was no way. Common sense. You have to deal with common sense. Well, let's see. I knew that no Russia would have done it because of Putin already had responded. There's two major pipelines, N Stream one, which has been alive for since 2011, and Nord Stream two, which is. These are huge. They moved millions of whatever the measurement is of natural gas. There is a different measurement and it's not cubic feet, it's they they they move in, they mouth stream one turn Germany because they supplied cheap natural gas. That was very clear. Then they needed it anyway. I'm just giving you all this because I'm not here. I can answer your question, but I be coming from the blue one. I don't want to come from the blue. I want people to understand I've done this a long time. So the White House, Mr. Hush, they have rejected your story outright. They've called it a figment of your imagination. More fiction than fact is the wording that they used. Germany has also taken a very cautious mind on your story. You referred before in your first answer to Western media like the New York Times, The Washington Post. Had you taken your story to the editors there, would they have published such a consequential story basis, Just one single, unnamed anonymous source? How would you react to that? This source? Would I the way described the story and the intent of how I sourced it? Was to be as as vague as possible. It would have been very

1. PATENT COOPERATION TREATY
PCT
INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
(PCT Article 18 and Rules 43 and 44)
Applicant
International application No. (Earliest) Priority Date (day/month/year)
International filing date (day/month/year)
Applicant’s or agent’s file reference
Form PCT/ISA/210 (first sheet) (July 2022)
This international search report has been prepared by this International SearchingAuthority and is transmitted to the applicant according
to Article 18. A copy is being transmitted to the International Bureau.
This international search report consists of a total of _______ sheets.
It is also accompanied by a copy of each prior art document cited in this report.
1. Basis of the report
a. With regard to the language, the international search was carried out on the basis of:
the international application in the language in which it was filed.
a translation of the international application into ______________________________ which is the language of
a translation furnished for the purposes of international search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1(b)).
b. This international search report has been established taking into account the rectification of an obvious mistake authorized
by or notified to this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43.6bis(a)).
c. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, see Box No. I.
2. Certain claims were found unsearchable (see Box No. II).
3. Unity of invention is lacking (see Box No. III).
4. With regard to the title,
the text is approved as submitted by the applicant.
the text has been established by this Authority to read as follows:
5. With regard to the abstract,
the text is approved as submitted by the applicant.
the text has been established, according to Rule 38.2, by this Authority as it appears in Box No. IV. The applicant may,
within one month from the date of mailing of this international search report, submit comments to this Authority.
6. With regard to the drawings,
a. the figure of the drawings to be published with the abstract is Figure No.______________
as suggested by the applicant.
as selected by this Authority, because the applicant failed to suggest a figure.
as selected by this Authority, because this figure better characterizes the invention.
b. none of the figures is to be published with the abstract.
FOR FURTHER ACTION
see Form PCT/ISA/220 as well as, where applicable, item 5 below.
ZEN108-PK-AN
PCT/IN2022/051037 28-11-2022 29-11-2021
KUMAR, PRASHANT
2
6

2. Form PCT/ISA/210 (second sheet) (July 2022)
International application No.
INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
A. CLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT MATTER
According to International Patent Classification (IPC) or to both national classification and IPC
Minimum documentation searched (classification system followed by classification symbols)
B. FIELDS SEARCHED
Electronic database consulted during the international search (name of database and, where practicable, search terms used)
Documentation searched other than minimum documentation to the extent that such documents are included in the fields searched
* Special categories of cited documents:
“A” document defining the general state of the art which is not considered
to be of particular relevance
“D” document cited by the applicant in the international application
“E” earlier application or patent but published on or after the international
filing date
“L” document which may throw doubts on priority claim(s) or which
is cited to establish the publication date of another citation or other
special reason (as specified)
“O” documentreferringtoanoraldisclosure,use,exhibitionorothermeans
“P” document published prior to the international filing date but later than
the priority date claimed
Name and mailing address of the ISA/ Authorized officer
Date of mailing of the international search report
Date of the actual completion of the international search
“T” later document published after the international filing date or priority
date and not in conflict with the application but cited to understand
the principle or theory underlying the invention
“X” document of particular relevance; the claimed invention cannot be
considered novel or cannot be considered to involve an inventive step
when the document is taken alone
“Y” document of particular relevance; the claimed invention cannot
be considered to involve an inventive step when the document is
combined with one or more other such documents, such combination
being obvious to a person skilled in the art
“&” document member of the same patent family
Facsimile No. Telephone No.
Category* Relevant to claim No.
Citation of document, with indication, where appropriate, of the relevant passages
C. DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT
Further documents are listed in the continuation of Box C. See patent family annex.
PCT/IN2022/051037
G06Q10/0639 Version=2023.01
G06Q
Databases: PatSeer, IPO Internal Database
Keywords: skill assess, skill upgrade, score, evaluate, database, match
Y
Y
US 2017221165 A1 (ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD),
03 August 2017 (03/08/2017) abstract ,
claims [1-5], paragraphs [0085, 0101-0105]
--------------------------------------------------
US 2018268341 A1 (SELLERATION INC), 20 September
2018 (20/09/2018) abstract and paragraph [0199]
1-18
1-18
20-03-2023 20-03-2023
Indian Patent Office
Plot No.32, Sector 14,Dwarka,New Delhi-110075
Pritish Ranjan Pradhan
+91-1125300200