2. Logical result of the
claims of cultural
relativism.
MORAL/ETHICAL RELATIVISM
3. A descriptive claim that ethical
practices differ among cultures,
that, as a matter of fact, what is
considered right in one culture
may be considered wrong in
another culture.
CULTURAL RELATIVISM
4. “a descriptive claim that ethical
practices differ among cultures,
that, as a matter of fact, what is
considered right in one culture
may be considered wrong in
another culture”
NORMAN BOWIE DEFINED CULTURAL RELATIVISM AS:
5. Here in the Philippines,
premarital sex is morally
unacceptable. If go to another
country, teenagers want to lose
their virginity at a young age.
EXAMPLE 1:
6. Here in the Philippines, we do
not cease to debate on the moral
acceptability of contraceptives,.
In another country, abortion is
perfectly normal, more so the
use of artificial contraceptives.
EXAMPLE 2:
7. One society make any
prohibitions on women; while
another society allows women
to have equal opportunities
and obligations as men.
EXAMPLE 3
8. They practice infanticide.
They lend their wives to their
visitors as a sign of hospitality.
Abandon their old and feeble
people in the snow to die.
JAMES RACHELS NOTES ON THE INTERESTING BUT
SEEMINGLY SCANDALOUS PRACTICES OF THE ESKIMOS:
9. WHO AND WHAT
DECIDES WHETHER
AN ACT IS MORALLY
RIGHT OR WRONG?
THE QUESTION FOR YOU IS!
19. SERIOUS LAPSE IN THE REASONING OF
THE ETHICAL RELATIVISTS WHEN IT
CONCLUDES THAT THERE IS NO
OBJECTIVE TRUTH IN ETHICS MERELY
FROM THE FACT THAT THERE ARE
DISAGREEMENT ABOUT AND
DIFFERENCES IN MORAL BELIEFS,
MORAL CODES AND MORAL PRACTICES
RACHELS: