This study examined solid waste management practices in Ukhra Village, India. It found that most households dispose of waste by throwing it in open land. The study evaluated waste generated from residential, commercial, and institutional sources, finding for example that each household produces an average of 76.4 kg of wet waste per year. It provided suggestions for improving solid waste management, such as establishing a budget, training programs, and a new management model for the village.

1. 1

2. A STUDY ON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
OF VILLAGERS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO UKHRA
VILLAGE, BANKOLA COLLIERY
Presented By: Satabdi Sen
2

3. FLOW OF PRESENTATION
3
Conclusion
Glimpses of waste disposal sites and Solid Waste Management System
Suggestions
Data Analysis and Findings
Research Methodology
Research Gap
Objectives of the study
Important Terms

4. IMPORTANT TERMS
 Waste
 Solid Waste
 Solid Waste Management
4

5. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
5
To study the socio-economic status of the
people residing in the village-Ukhra.
To study the present solid waste disposal
practices prevailing in the society.
To study and evaluate the amount of various
solid waste generated from different categories
of sources of solid waste generation.

6. RESEARCH GAP
 Most of the researches that are conducted on Solid Waste
Management focuses mostly on MSW (Municipality Solid Waste). So
to focus on Solid wastes generated in villages, this study is
conducted.
6

7. SCHEMATIC VIEW OF STUDY
7

8. PILOT STUDY
8

9. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
 Research Design: Exploratory
 Tools of Data Collection: Interview schedule
 Graphical Presentation: Bar Graph and Pie Chart
 Universe:
9

10. CONT…
Universe Universe
Size
Sample
Size
Sampling Method
Residential Source:
1. Gulzarbagh Ward
2. Kankar Danga Ward
275
235
55
47
Cluster Sampling
Commercial Source:
1. Open Air Market
2. Daily Market
50
110
10
22
Purposive Sampling
Simple Random
Institutional Source:
1. Schools
2. Dispensary
20
1
4
1
Simple Random
No Sampling method 10

11. DATA ANALYSIS
11

12. PART 1: SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITION OF THE RESPONDENT
FROM THE RESIDENTIAL SOURCE
12
36.30%
16.70%
12.70% 12.70% 12.70% 12.70%
4%
2.00%
No
education
Primary Upper
Primary
Secondary Higher
Secondary
Graduate Post
Graduate
Others
Education Qualifications

13. CONT….
 Family Size
13
37%
40%
16%
6%
1%
1 2 3 4 5
Criteria Number of Family
members
Frequency
1 1-4 38
2 5-8 41
3 9-12 16
4 13-16 6
5 17 and more 1

14. CONT…
64.70%
16.70%
6.90%
11.80%
1
2
3
More than 3
1 2 3 More than 3
14

15. CONT…
47%
53%
Permanent source of income
Yes No
15

16. PART 2: PREVAILING WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES IN THE
VILLAGE.
 Prevailing waste disposal practices
16
87%
3%
9%
1%
Open Land Burned Pond Others
Residential Source

17. CONT…
 Prevailing waste disposal practices
17
90%
10% 0%0% 0%
Open land Pond Burned
Rag pickers Others
Open air market
82%
9%
9%
Open Land Along the road
Rag Pickers
Daily Market

18. CONT…
 Prevailing waste disposal practices
18
Open
Land
20%
Burned
60%
Rag
pickers
20%
Schools
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Burned
Percent
Dispensary

19.  Evaluation of the quantities of various types of solid
wastes generated from different sources of waste
generation.
19
76.4
15.74
0.028
Residential Source
2808
1385
151 0.57
Institutional Source

20. CONT…
20
248
0 0
Wet Waste Dry Non
recyclables
Dry
Recyclables
Quantity in Kg
Open air market
415.37
142.08
81.66
Wet Waste Dry Non
recyclable
Recyclable
Quantity in Kg
Daily market

21. WILLINGNESS TO PAY THE SERVICE CHARGE FOR THE SWM
PROJECT IF IMPLEMENTED.
No
money
20%
10 to 15
10%
21 to
25
10%
26 to 30
50%
36-40
10%
21
No
money
18%
10 to 15
11%
16to20
14%
21 to 25
6%
26-30
26%
36-40
16%
40+
9%
Residential Source Open Air Market

22. WILLINGNESS TO PAY THE SERVICE CHARGE FOR THE SWM
PROJECT IF IMPLEMENTED.
No
money
16%
26-30
26%
36-40
16%
46-50
16%
56-60
26%
22
Daily Market
Rs. 200
50%Rs.1000
25%
Rs.50
25%
School

23. OBJECTIVES FINDINGS
Objective-1: To
study the socio-
economic status
of the people in
the village-Ukhra.
1. 64.7% of households rely on 1 earning member in a family.
2. Around 53% of respondents did not have a permanent source of
income.
Objective-2: To
study the Present
Solid Waste
disposal
practices
prevailing in the
society.
Residential Source:
87% of sample population prefer to throw the garbage in open land.
Open Air Market
90% of the respondent responded that they throw the garbage in
open land and the remaining 10% throw the wastes in the river.
Daily Market
82% of the respondent throw the garbage in open land.
Schools
60% of the respondent from schools responded that they prefer to
burn the daily solid waste generated.
Dispensary
The waste that is collected is burned in a open land behind the
dispensary
23

24. OBJECTIVES FINDINGS
Objective 3: To study
evaluate the amount of
various solid waste
generated from various
categories of sources of
solid waste generation.
Residential Source:
1.Each household generate an average amount of 76.44 Kg of
wet wastes each year.
2.Each household generate an average amount of 0.28 Kg of
recyclable items each year.
Commercial Source:
A. Open Air Market
Each vendors of the Haat Bazaar generate an average
amount of 248 Kg of wet wastes each year.
B. Daily Market
1.Each shops of the daily market generates an average
amount of 415 Kg of wet wastes every year.
2.Each shops of the daily market generates an average
amount of 81.66 Kg of recyclable items each year.
Institutional Source:
Each school generates an average amount of 2808.28 Kg. wet
wastes each year.
Each school generates an average amount of 0.57 Kg of
recyclable items each year. 24

25. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
 Data is collected from only 2 wards, as a result the entire HH
population of the village is not taken into consideration for the study.
 The quantity of solid wastes considered for the study is an estimated
data that is obtained by the responses of the respondents along with
observing the containers used for collection of solid waste . Hence,
proper accurate data about the weight is not available. And its under
further study.
25

26. SUGGESTIONS
 A proposal on Solid Waste Management has been suggested to the
CSR wing of Eastern Coalfields Limited, Bankola Area .
 Estimated Budget Outlay For SWM Project.
 Projected Cash flow
26

27. SUMMARY
27
1. Clean Environment
2. Employment
3.Empowerment
1. Framing of Budget.
2. Training and Awareness Programme
Framing Of SWM Model
Study on:
1. Socio-Economic Conditions of Villagers
2. Prevailing Waste Disposal System
3. Quantity of Various Waste

28. PROPOSED MODEL FOR SWM
28

29. 29
GLIMPSES OF DISPOSAL PRACTICES

30. INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
30

31. CONT…
31
COMPOSTING SITE SEGREGATION SITE

32. 32