2. A Presentation Sandra S Kurian (Mar
Athanasius College of Engineering,
Kothamangalam, Kerala)
During the Internship under Prof. Sameer
Mathur ( Marketing Management, IIM
Lucknow)
3. Situation
Colgate – Palmolive’s oral care division
has come up with a technologically
superior tooth brush, primarily named
PRECISION
But…..
There is competition in the market due to
high productivity
5. Features of PRECISION
Bristles of three different lengths
and orientation to
facilitate triple action brushing
effect :
1) Longer outside bristles ( to clean
gum lines )
6. Features of PRECISION( Continued)
An average of 35% more plaque
removal than competitors (Reach and
Oral B)
Same Effect in Horizontal and vertical
brushing
7. Competitions : (1) ORAL B
• 23.1% volume market shares and 30.7% value
shares in US retail sales
• Relied Heavily on Professional Endorsements
• In July 1991, Oral-B launched the Indicator
brush, priced at a 15% premium to its other
brushes
• It had a patch of blue bristles that faded to white
when it was time for replacement
• Consumer promotions were expected to cost
$4.5 million (5% of sales) and include $1.00-off
coupons, “buy-one-get-one-free” offers and
$2.00 mail-in refunds. Media expenditures for
8. Competitions : (2) Johnson and Johnson
• The Reach brand, which, in 1991,
comprised 18 SKUs and Prevent, a brush
with a beveled handle to help consumers
brush at a 45% angle—the recommended
brushing technique
• Reach line was positioned as the
toothbrush that enabled consumers to
brush in even the hardest-to-reach places,
thereby increasing the efficiency of
brushing.
9. Competitions : (3) Procter and Gamble
• Crest had long, rippled bristles of different
lengths, designed to reach between the
teeth. Crest had “the ability to reach
between the teeth up to 37% farther than
leading flat brushes.”
• Consumer promotions already announced
included 55 cent coupons and $1.99
refunds on toothbrushes purchased from
floor stands. Media expenditures for the
last quarter of 1992 were estimated at
$6.4 million;
10. Competitions : (4) Smithkline Beecham
• Aquafresh Flex toothbrushes had flexible
handles that allowed for gentle brushing
• The 1992 promotion plan, estimated at
$4.6 million (25% of sales), included $1.99
mail refunds, “buy-two-get-one-free” offers,
toothbrush on-pack with toothpaste, and a
self-liquidating premium offer of towels.
• Other competitors included Lever, Pfizer,
and Sunstar
11. Colgate Palmolive Background
1) CP’s 5 year plan :
• New product launches
• Entry into new geographic markets
• A continuous focus on core consumer
products
2) 243 million dollars to be spent to upgrade 25
of CP’s manufacturing plants; 275 new
products introduced in market
3) In 1991, CP held 43% of the world toothpaste
market and 16% of the world toothbrush market
4) CP’s U.S. toothbrush sales in 1991 reached $77
12. Colgate Palmolive Background (continued)
• Several strategic acquisitions (e.g., of the Mennen
men’s toiletries company) were completed
• Manufacturing began in China and Eastern
Europe
• New products launched in the U.S. market
included Colgate Baking Soda toothpaste and the
Colgate Angle and Wild Ones toothbrushes.
• CP offered two lines of toothbrushes in 1991—the
Colgate Classic and the Colgate Plus.
• Colgate Classic was positioned in the “value”
segment and was CP’s original entry in the
toothbrush market
• Colgate Plus was positioned as a higher-quality
14. Categories of Toothbrushes
• TWO CATEGORIES:
1) Professional brushes (priced between
$1.59 and $2.09; 42-
44% of the brushes)
2) Value Brushes (priced on average at
$1.29 ( 24% of brushes)
• The late 1980s saw the emergence of
SUPER- PREMIUM brushes (priced above
$2.00 ; retail prices between $2.29 and
15. CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR
• Baby Boom generation had concerns for
gum health when compared to cavity
protection and would pay a premium price
to solve it
• Purchase frequency was low due to 2 for 1
offers
• Brand choice was based on features ,
comfort and professional recommendation
• Factors mainly affecting brand choice :
Size and shape of mouth; Sensitivity of
gums; Personal brushing styles and
16.
17. Types of Brushers
• Therapeutic Brushers ( Avoid oral Care
Problems)
• Cosmetic Brushers ( Try to prevent bad
breath and ensure white teeth)
• Uninvolved Brushers (Not really motivates
by oral care benefits ; adjust their
behaviour only when confronted on oral
hygiene terms)
18. Advertising and Promotion ( progressing
trends)
• Advertising media expenditures ,neededto launch new tooth
brushes , rose
• Total media spending on television advertising grewfroma
total of 55 million dollars in 1992 to 70 million dollars in 1993
• Growingcompetition also increased frequency and value of
consumer promotion events
• Retail advertising features and in store displays increased
toothbrush sales
19. Colgate Palmolive Statistics
• CP toothbrush line held 25% to 40% of
category shelfspace in most stores
• 22% of all toothbrushes were expected
to be distributed to consumers by
dentists with dedicated sales force
• When Colgate brushes were sold with
toothpastes, sales increased to 170%
21. MAINSTREAM POSITINING STRATEGY
• Resulted in larger market
and volume shares within
a year of launch
• Massive proportion of
sales wouldoccur through
mass merchandisingand
club stores
• Highest possibility of Cannibalization
of ColgatePlus
•Rescheduling of production,
designatedfor Niche positioning
•Possibility of inadequate supplyof
product
•Mainsteaming with 7 SKUs will result
in dropping of atleast 1 SKU
22. NICHE POSITIONING STRATEGY
• Targeting
consumers
concerned about
gum diseases
• Captures 3% of US
Toothbrush market
by 1st year of launch
• Gain command of
• If Mainstream
positioned, precision
would capture 10%
of market share in 1st
year
• Volume shares
would be equal to
24. Branding preference
• Stressing Precision as opposed to Colgate
would limit the extent of cannibalization of
Colgate Plus
• Whether mianstream or niche positioned,
cannibalization of Colgate Plus would
increase by 20%, if Colgate brand name
was stressed but would remain unchanged
if Precision brand name was stressed first
• Thus, Precision brand name was alone
25. Test Consumers’ responses
• Prevention of Gum diseases motivated
greatest purchase intent
• 55% test consumers found precision to be
very different; 77% claimed that it was more
effective
• However, the brush looked unusual and test
participants had initially mixed responses
• There was a difficulty to convey the benefit of
reduced gum disease from extra plaque
removal as few consumers only
acknowledged that they had gum disease
• But the more they were enlightened on the
features, the higher rose their enthusiasm.
27. Brand it as
“Precision by
Colagte” to
reduce
Cannibalisation
As Colgate
Plus
is the
bread and
28. Positioning
• Niche position it initially, and later
mainstream it, to avoid cannibalization
possibilities at start itself
• In the short niche timeline, improve a
feature or two of the Colgate Plus as a
safety check against cannibalization
• See for more outlet options beyond club
stores tec.
29. Advertising Strategy and Distribution
• Advertise it, stressing on the issues
overcome, more informatively
• Increase consumer promotions among
kids and maybe provide special discounts
on festive seasons and also for disabled
kids, as rain checks for mainstream
positioning
• Ensure active feedback and most widened
sampling through dentists, schools and
fast food joints
• Mainly dentists, as Professional
30. • Reach out through social initiatives and
make it affordable for the same
• Endorse more to appeal to the sentiments
of therapeutic brushers
• Associate a super premium toothpaste,
dental floss and mouth wash with
precision