The document discusses the role and benefits of human resource auditing for organizational effectiveness. It explains that HR auditing provides independent assurance by evaluating HR departments and practices against agreed standards to identify areas for improvement. The benefits of HR auditing include a focus on objectives, standards, and future improvements through an evidence-based approach and high-level reporting.
3. Audit Assurance
Auditing as: listening to the records
Independent
Standards based
Agreed Work Program
Standard Processes/evidence based
High level credibility and reporting
Action-in-response
Follow up; look toward replication
18/03/2022
3
4. 18/03/2022
4
Performance to an auditor ..
• Effectiveness (doing the right thing)
• Efficiency (doing things right)
• Economy (alternative cost)
• Equity – as effectiveness criteria
HR tend to focus on effectiveness, auditors
on efficiency and economy (Craven & McNulty 1994)
5. 18/03/2022
5
Org. Effectiveness Involves:
Khan 2005
Extent to which organisational objectives are
being achieved (outcomes).
Ensuring the costs of reaching these
objectives were as expected, or within the
range of expectations
Analyse the causes of failure (gap analysis)
Isolate external factors
Report on the monitoring or reporting
system that tracks progress to achievement
6. 18/03/2022
6
HR Performance Auditing
The case study demonstrated that a
properly constructed performance audit of
human resource activities can identify areas
where future improvements can be made,
even to a valued, responsive and award
winning HR department.
Endgame – reverse chronology;
performance evaluation; outcomes focus ;
standards: framework; external evaluation:
evidence based: big data analytics;
workforce management standards.
7. 18/03/2022
7
Observation
A performance audit of HR
activity is difficult when the
current evaluation practices do
not address the concepts of
efficiency, effectiveness or
economy.
There is a need to align
measurement and reporting to
performance evaluation – 3 E’s
8. 18/03/2022
8
Context – Last Decade
HR is rated as the worst performing of
all business functions (Global Survey of 555 Senior
Executives, April 2006).
The world’s best performing companies
spend 25% less on HR and rely on 16%
fewer staff (HR Magazine Nov 2005).
Could there, or should there be, HR
standards? (SHRM 2005)
9. Recent literature:
Deloitte Human Capital Trends 2015
– Nearly 40% of new ‘Chief HR Officers’ come
from business, not HR.
Harvard Business Review:
– It’s time to blow up HR (Cover, 2015)
The Rise of HR (2015)
– What do HR professionals need to know or do to
be effective in today’s and tomorrow's business
world? … 73 different answers but not standards
or auditing.
18/03/2022
9
10. 18/03/2022
10
What to do about our profession?
HR Framework - SABPP
HR Standards - SABPP
HR Auditing (independent) - SABPP
HR Performance Auditing - SABPP
Design of HR outcomes criteria - SABPP
HR Reporting that address the 3 E’s.
HR ROI and business justifications
HR Standards & Big Data/Analytics
HR Workforce Management Standard
11. 18/03/2022
11
The Role of HR Auditing
Evaluation of HR Department
Evaluation of People Practices
Provides Audit Assurance
Provides Independent Assurance
Types of audits
Certification against Standards
Performance Improvement
Risk Assessment/Assurance
12. The benefits of HR Auditing
Evaluation by trained experts
Focus on Standards
Focus on Objectives: I – P – O - O – R
Future orientated; gain funding support
High level reporting (CEO, Board)
Big data – a database of better
practices, analytics, etc
Demonstrate our professionalism
Recognition & promotion of HR
18/03/2022
12
13. The costs of HR Auditing
Direct and indirect costs?
Time taken acceptable?
Alternative cost (economics)
Value (value-for-money)
Does the whole process add value to
the organisation?
Does it enhance or detract from HR’s
professional reputations and standing?
18/03/2022
13
14. The Evaluation of HR Audits
Are they effective in achieving
objectives?
Are they efficient?
Are they economic?
Can we use technology to improve our
auditing performance?
Calculating the Return on Investment
(ROI)
Demonstrating the ROI in case studies
18/03/2022
14
16. 18/03/2022
16
Potential Research topics:
HDR students; more of these.
HR Auditing case studies; database of better
practice
HR Performance Auditing case studies; database
Evidence based staffing – health sector model
HR Standards & Big Data Analytics
HR ROI and business justifications
Mapping & Aligning: HR competency, membership
and performance standards
Workforce Management Standard
Editor's Notes
Will so slightly outside the brief to include evaluation of HR Auditing.
11, 7, 4 now 19, 15 and 12.
Chris Andrews, Director of human Resources, Bond University 1100 employees, HR staff of 10; winners of VC awards 3 times, twice runner-up, (2) , (5) in 10 years. Team of HR degree qualified staff. Completed a doctorate in HR Performance Auditing, Married, wife is a mechanical engineer who decided to go into politics; three daughters, JP (Qual), Scout parent, proud GC Suns AFL supporter, Homeless bus driver. Post-doc: embarked on a A$ 1.36 million HR Standards project – in my spare time.
Acknowledge support from Bond University to attend [Faculty of Business, Research Office, People and Strategy Department]; looking to study consider Bond; Gold Coast. Thank SABPP and CEO Marius for the invitation and the warm welcome received during the visit. Hat dip to Alan Hosking, Christine & Penny. Thinking about this topic since last century (1999).
Signpost: background; audit assurance, HR profession needs solid foundations, last decade – failure to improve, what to do about it.
Effectiveness; Role & Benefits of HR Auditing; HR Review/HR Audit Matrix’; Research Topics
Defining characteristics are:
Independence
Reporting structure – reports received at highest levels
Evaluation experts – evidence based analysis
Methodology – designed for replication – files –
Action-in-response
Respected Reports – well designed - generally don’t have methodology issues.
Good for HR to know where the goal pots are before the evaluation commences.
Research shows HR tends to focus on effectiveness.
My experience is that people are less familiar with economy
Alternative way of doing things; Alternative cost;
There is overlap between the three categories, no neat divide
HR Activities:
Objectives: Increase staff capability
Inputs:
Processes:
Outputs:
Outcomes – compared to objectives -effectiveness
Risks
Objectives should be the same as your outcomes., at the time you commence. They may have to be modified over time.
Doctorate – get the theory right and then demonstrate the application of theory in a practical way.
Case Study: QUT University, Seema Patel, Graham MacAulay
Dr Simon Fry, Professor Ben Swanepoel
Significant issue: lack of standards to audit against, developed them.
Critical issues for HR success: top 5 right you have to get right.
Alignment with Senior Management, budgets, priorities
Performance auditing forces you to examine the three concepts.
Reporting systems are not geared to analyse performance tn this way.
QUT operated the Universities HR benchmarking program – but many of the measures were input, process, or output measures , rather than outcomes.
Post doctorate – HR Standards project - $1.36 M – 22 of 38 universities.
HR Framework
Standards for five activities (obj -input-process- output- outcome-risks)
Mapped benchmarking measures.
Spoke with SHRM about their standards project.
SHRM stepped back
SABPP - Marius
Lee Webster + Dr Ron McKinley - UTMBG
Undergraduate HR course (1985) – A profession in transition - do we focus on getting the basics of personnel management right and then moving on to strategic HR or do we make the jump to the new Human Resources as a single leap upward?
We need to demonstrate our credibility in HR activities, budgets, ROI, client focus first then look at whole of organisation.
HR standards – fairly pedestrian view; good for ensuring al elements were in place but does not provide a direct link to organisational objectives.
By 2005 HR profession had not progressed to where it wanted to be.
SHRM – wrong question; Susan Meisenger
Lean But Agile (2012) – Neil McCormick – wrote about HR standards
SHRM – HR Standards Project – talked
University HR Standards Project
ROI project – Dept of Defence
Workforce Management Standard
Health Administration Standard (UTMB)
Future – University Administration Standard?
Need to build a solid foundation for the profession and that means nailing HR standards
Need to have a solid link between different types of standards:
ACTIVITY STANDARRDS (HR performance)
COMPETENCY STANDARDS (individuals - membership)
LEARNING OUTCOMES (higher education and professional training)
Need to provide assurance – through certification.
Auditors are the evaluation experts.
High level reporting
Adds Credibility
Replication
Methodology – Files – Action-in-response
Co-operation between internal auditors and HR
Respect - Positive Image
Performance Evaluation – direct link to effectiveness
Standards and audits encourage consistency
Provide a database of good practice
Informs what we expect to see
Highlights critical issues for organisational success
Research – sound HR and bottom line performance.
Scale of Review from self review to external audit.
Scale of standards from organisational (if these exist) to national level.
Encourage discussion on how to move the profession forward through a robust research program covering key areas.