3. CONTENTS
• Introduction
• Historical Background
• GCF as transudate and exudate
• Formation of GCF
• Factors affecting flow of GCF
• Permeability of Junctional and sulcular epithelia
• Methods of collection.
• Methods of estimating the GCF volume collected
• Amount
4. • Problems with GCF collection and data interpretation
• Composition
• Methodology used to analyze GCF components
• Functions of GCF
• Clinical significance
• Drugs in Gingival Crevicular Fluid
• GCF as biomarker
• Conclusion
• References
6. • The gingival sulcus is the shallow
crevice or space around the tooth
bounded by the surface of the tooth on
one side and the epithelium lining the
free margin of the gingiva on the
other side.
• Sulcular fluid, or gingival crevicular
fluid (GCF), contains an array of
biologic mediators, cells, and bacteria
11. • According to Alfano and Pashley, the initial fluid produced could
simply represent interstitial fluid which appears in the crevice as a
result of an osmotic gradient.
• This initial, pre-inflammatory fluid was considered to be a transudate,
and, on stimulation, this changed to become an inflammatory exudate
14. Alfano Model (1974)
Bacterial plaque
Accumulation of high molecular
weight molecules
Permeate the intercellular regions
of the epithelium
Osmotic gradient
Flow of interstitial fluid from the
connective tissue to the gingival
sulcus.
15. Pashley Model (1976)
When the rate of capillary filtrate exceeds that of
lymphatic uptake, fluid will accumulate as edema
and/or leave the area as GCF.
Capillaries Tissues
Lymphatic
system
16. Factors affecting flow of GCF:
Osmotic pressure
within the
different
compartments.
Filtration
coefficients of the
lymphatic and
capillary
endothelium
18. • The initial studies by Brill and Krasse (1958) involving the use of
fluorescein were later conirmed with substances such as India ink and
saccharated iron oxide.
• Substances that have been shown to penetrate the sulcular epithelium
include:
Albumin
Endotoxin
Thymidine
Histamine
Phenytoin
Horseradish peroxidase.
19. • Squier and Johnson (1975) reviewed the mechanisms of penetration
through an intact epithelium. The intercellular movement of molecules
and ions along intercellular spaces appears to be a possible
mechanism.
• Substances that take this route do not traverse the cell membranes.
21. Absorbing paper strips
• Intra sulcular method:
The Brill (1958) technique involves
inserting it into the pocket until resistance
is encountered.
This method introduces a degree of
irritation of the sulcular epithelium that
can, by itself, trigger the flow of fluid
22. • Extrasulcular method:
Löe and Holm-Pedersen (1965) placed the
filter paper strip just at or over the pocket
entrance .
In this way, fluid that seeps out is picked up
by the strip, but the sulcular epithelium is not
in contact with the paper
23. Advantages
Quick and easy to use.
It can be applied to individual
sites.
Possibly, it is the least traumatic
method when correctly used
Disadvantages
The procedure delivers a level of
aggravation of the crevicular
epithelium that expands the
creation of gingival crevicular
liquid
GCF tests are typically debased
by blood, spit, or dental plaque
and their essence influences the
precision in volume assurance
and organization of GCF.
24. Preweighed twisted threads
(Weinstein and colleagues(1967) )
• Threads were set in the gingival hole
around the tooth
• The strings were weighed before
assortment inside a fixed micro
centrifugation plastic cylinder and
the weighing was rehashed following
the collection.
25. Micropipettes or capillary tubing method
(Krasse and Egelberg (1962) )
• Capillary tubes of standardized length and
diameter are placed in the pocket.
• Their contents are later centrifuged and
analyzed.
26. Advantages
Larger volume can be collected
It provides an undiluted sample
of native GCF whose volume can
be accurately assessed.
Disadvantages
Time consuming
It would also require more effort
from the clinician
Difficulty of removing complete
sample from the tubing
27. Gingival crevicular washings methods:
Oppenheim (1970)
Suggested the use of an appliance that consists of a hard acrylic plate
that covers the maxilla, with soft borders and a groove that follows the
gingival margins.
It is connected to four collection tubes.
Washings are obtained by rinsing the crevicular areas from one side to
the other with the use of a peristaltic pump
28. Skapski and Lehner (1976):
Suggested the use of two injection needles
that have been fitted one within the other.
During sampling, the inside (ejection) needle
is at the bottom of the pocket and the outside
(collecting) needle is at the gingival margin.
The collection needle is drained into a
sample tube via continuous suction.
29. 10μl of Hank's reasonable salt arrangement shot out into interdental
papilla from a miniaturized scale syringe and the arrangement is re-
suctioned once more.
Advantages
Qualitative appraisal
Valuable for gathering cells and microscopic organisms from the
gingival hole.
Disadvantages
GCF from singular destinations can't be examined.
High pace of blood sullying because of the expanded chance of
gingival aggravation.
Production of altered acrylic stents is confused and in fact requesting.
31. Advantages
• Quick and simple to utilize
Disadvantages
• The measure of gathered liquid is
incredibly little. GCF tests are
generally defiled by blood, spit,
or dental plaque and their
essence influences the exactness
in volume assurance a structure
of GCF.
33. Staining of strips
• The wetted area can be made
more visible by staining with
Ninhydrin.
• It is then measured
planimetrically on an enlarged
photograph or with a magnifying
glass or a microscope.
34. Electronic method
• An electronic method has been devised
for measuring the fluid collected on a
“blotter” (Periopaper) with the use of
an electronic transducer (Periotron,
Harco Electronics, Winnipeg,
Manitoba, Canada).
• The wetness of the paper strip affects
the flow of an electric current and
provides a digital readout.
35. Three models of Periotron have been produced:-
600
6000
8000
Advantages
Rapid technique
Has no discernable effect on GCF sample
36.
37. Weighting the strip
Pre-weighted strip is inserted into the gingival crevice & then
determined the amount of fluid collected by weighting the sample
Isotope dilution method
To measure extremely small amount of GCF present in a particular
space at any given time (Challacombe 1980)
39. • The amount of GCF collected is extremely small.
• Measurements performed by Cimasoni (1983) showed that a strip of
paper 1.5-mm wide and inserted 1 mm within the gingival sulcus of a
slightly inflamed gingiva absorbs about 0.1 mg of GCF in 3 minutes
• Challacombe’s calculations for human volunteers with mean gingival
indices of less than 1 showed that the mean GCF volume in the
proximal spaces from the molar teeth ranged from 0.43 to 1.56 µL.
46. Bacteria Associated with GCF
Diagnostic tests based on the use of
GCF sample can also indicate the
presence of bacteria such as:
Porphyromonas gingivalis,
Actinobacillus
actinomycetemcomitans
Prevotella intermedia
Treponema denticola
Tannarella forsythensisi
Capnocytophaga spp
52. Circadian Periodicity
Gradual increase in the
amount of GCF from 6
a.m. to 10 p.m. and a
decrease thereafter.
(Bissada et al in 1967)
Daytime variations did not
have significant impact on
GCF volume (Suppipat et
al 1997, Denizer et al 2000)
54. Mechanical Stimulation
i) Chewing
ii) Vigorous gingival brushing
iii) Minor stimuli represented by
intrasulcular placement of paper strips
(Brill in 1959)
Increases
GCF
flow
58. Drugs in Gingival Crevicular Fluid
• Drugs that are excreted through the GCF may be used advantageously
in periodontal therapy.
• Bader and Goldhaber (1966) demonstrated in dogs that tetracyclines
are excreted through the GCF.
• Azithromycin concentrations in GCF were higher and more sustained
than those in serum. (Pin-Chuang Lai et al (2011))
59. • Stephen et al (1980) measured the concentrations of ampicillin,
tetracycline, erythromycin and clindamycin in serum, saliva and
gingival fluid after a single oral dose administration.
• Eisenberg et al. (1991) detected metronidazole in GCF
• Gingival fluid antibiotic concentrations were equal to those found in
saliva
• They were, however, always much lower than the concentrations
found in serum
61. Biomarker???
A biomarker is defined as a “Parameter that is objectively measured and
evaluated as an indicator of normal biological or pathological processes, or
pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention” (NIH 1998).
62. The rationale behind the use of GCF as a
biomarker
Identify specific
periodontal diseases
Identify antibiotic
susceptibility of
infecting organisms
colonizing diseased
sites.
Predict disease activity
63. According to Armitage (2004), more than 65 GCF constituents have
been evaluated as potential diagnostic markers of periodontal diseases.
These components fall into 3 general categories:
Biomarkers
Host derived enzymes
and their inhibitors
Inflammatory mediators
and host response
modifiers
Byproduct of tissue
breakdown
65. GCF Composition in Relation with
Systemic Diseases
Systemic conditions are associated with changes in the levels of certain
biomarkers that could be detected in GCF.
• Increase glucose in diabetic patient.
• Increase urea, alteration of protein in kidney disease.
• Increase lactic acid in liver disease.
• Increase calcium in hyperparathyroidism.
• Increase alkaline phosphatase in bone disease (Ricket's, Paget's
disease)
66. Advantages of collecting GCF as a
biomarker
noninvasive
site-specific about
teeth
comparatively easy
to perform
offers one of the most
accessible entrees of any
tissue in the body
67. Conclusion
The origin, the composition and the clinical significance of GCF have
significantly helped our understanding of the pathogenesis of
periodontal diseases. Through the biomarker discovery process, new
therapeutics have been designed linking therapeutic and diagnostic
approaches together leading to more individualized and targeted
treatments for oral health
68. References
• Newman Takei, Klokkevold, Carranza, Carranza’s clinical periodontology,
Elsevier publication 13th edition
• Newman Takei, Klokkevold, Carranza, Carranza’s clinical periodontology,
Elsevier publication 10th edition
• Griffiths. Formation, collection and significance of GCF.Periodontol2000; 2003:
volume 31,32-42.
• Gingival Crevicular Fluid Lecture: 12 Dr. Ali A Abdulkareem
• A comprehensive updated review on gingival crevicular fluid: characteristics,
collection and estimation Gajbhiye Pranali, Gholse Yogesh, Kasliwal Rahul,
Thakre Anup Priyadarshini Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Allied
Sciences, V 9-I 1, 901. March-April 2020, 2405-2411.
69. • Evaluation of Components of Gingival Crevicular Fluid as Diagnostic
Tests Ira B. Lamster: Annals of Periodontology; Vol. 2, No. 1, March
1997; 123-137.
• The Origin of Gingival Fluid Michael C. Alfano J. Theor. Biol. (1974)
47, 127-136.
• Pin-Chuang Lai, Weiting Ho, Nidhi Jain, John D.Walters J Periodontol
2011;82:1582-1586.
• Analysis of gingival crevice fluid and risk of progression of
periodontitis. Gary C Armitage. Periodontol2000; 2004: volume 34,
109-119.
• Analysis of Daytime Variations in Gingival Crevicular Fluid: A
Circadian Periodicity. Sevim Gunday, Ali Orkun Topcu, Esra Ercan,
and Nermin Yamalik. J Periodontol 2014; 85:47-56.
Editor's Notes
(1st point)It is V shaped
(2nd point) which have been shown to indicate the metabolic status of the periodontium
HISTORICAL TIMELINE REVIEWING THE STUDY OF GCF
Waerhaug 1950 (focused on anatomy of sulcus and its transformation into gingival pocket during course of periodontits)
Brill et al 1958 (laid the foundation for understanding the physiology of GCF formation and its composition)
Lӧe et al 1965 (GCF as indicator of periodontal diseases)
Egelberg 1969 (focused his studies on dentogingival blood vessels And their permeability as they relate GCF flow)
Sueda Bang Cimasoni 1969 (Presence and functions of proteins)
Schroeder and Listgarten 1970 (The rationale for understanding dentogingival structure and physiology was created by outstanding electron microscopic studies)
Cimasoni 1974 (Gave the comprehensive review “ The crevicular fluid”)
Ohisson et al 1983 (Collagenase and elastase in GCF are derieved from humn cells)
Brill confirmed the presence of GCF in humans and considered it as “transudate.”
Löe H and Weinstein E et al demonstrated that GCF is an inflammatory exudate rather than a continuous transudate
In healthy condition, the majority of interstitial fluid is drained by lymphatic system and only small amount leak into gingival crevice forming transude.
During periodontal disease, the amount of leaked fluid from blood vessels is beyond the drainage capacity of lymphatics, leading to formation of inflammatory exudate.
The first studies by Alfano (1974) suggested that, at a clinically healthy gingival crevice, bacterial plaque would result in the accumulation of high molecular weight molecules. These would permeate the intercellular regions of the epithelium, but would then be limited by the basement membrane. Here they would accumulate and produce an osmotic gradient which would induce the flow of interstitial fluid from the connective tissue to the gingival sulcus.
The model proposed by Pashley (1976) predicted that GCF production is governed by the passage of fluid from capillaries into the tissues (capillary filtrate) and the removal of this fluid by the lymphatic system (lymphatic uptake). When the rate of capillary filtrate exceeds that of lymphatic uptake, fluid will accumulate as edema and/or leave the area as GCF.
These findings indicate permeability to substances with a molecular weight of up to 1000 kD
Contamination: The major sources of contamination of GCF samples would be blood, saliva, or plaque. Careful isolation should be performed in an effort to minimize the potential for saliva contamination.
Sampling time: the nature of the GCF sample collected is likely to change with the protein concentration of the initial GCF collected
Volume determination: evaporation is considered to be a significant problem in accurate volume determination of GCF samples., because the total sample of GCF collected is small the percentage of error is considered to be of more major significance.
Recovery from strips: A variety of methods of elution have been employed, but it is essential in all instances to determine the percentage recovery from the original samples. There are significant differences in the percentage recovery of proteins from filter papers, which were dependent on both the type of paper and the concentration of the original protein sample
Data reporting: Constituents found within GCF samples have either been reported as absolute amount (mg), concentrations (mg/ml) or either of these two measurements with reference to pocket depth or duration of sample collection. because of the inherent problems of accurate determination of GCF volume, concentration was not an appropriate method of data presentation