51. COVID-19 & NIV
Early series suggested high mortality for
patients with COVID-19–associated
respiratory failure who received invasive
mechanical ventilatory support
52. Current thinking suggests that NIV may be an
appropriate bridging adjunct in the early part
of the disease progress and may prevent the
need for intubation or invasive ventilation
53. Published cohorts suggest that noninvasive
ventilation is a commonly used intervention in
COVID-19-related AHRF
It is uncertain whether noninvasive ventilation is
beneficial or harmful for patients with COVID-19
54. A total of 586 confirmed COVID-19-positive patients were
hospitalised during the study period, of whom 103 (17.6%)
required noninvasive ventilation or invasive mechanical
ventilation
Among those patients who had an initial trial of noninvasive
ventilation, 27/ 58 progressed to invasive mechanical
ventilation whereas 31/58 did not require subsequent invasive
mechanical ventilation
55. Of note, 29/31 (94%) patients in Group
NIV alone were discharged from hospital
alive with the remaining 2/31 (6%) being
alive in the ICU at the time of data
collection
56. Network Metaanalysis: Ferreyro BL et.al.JAMA. Published
online June 4, 2020
Association of helmet NIV with reduced
rate of intubation and reduced mortality
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
(CPAP), a form of NIV, appeared to have
a more significant and positive role than
initially thought
66. For some patients, while NIV may temporarily
improve oxygenation and work of breathing, it
does not change natural disease progression
and is not a replacement for intubation and
invasive ventilation
67. General Considerations
The key to the successful application of noninvasive
ventilation is in recognizing its capabilities and
limitations
Identification of the appropriate patient for the
application of noninvasive ventilation (NIV).
It may involve a trial of noninvasive ventilation.
70. Patient inclusion criteria
Patient cooperation (an essential component that excludes agitated,
belligerent, or comatose patients)
Dyspnea (moderate to severe, but short of respiratory failure)
Tachypnea (>24 breaths/min)
Increased work of breathing (accessory muscle use, pursed-lips
breathing)
Hypercapnic respiratory acidosis (pH range 7.10-7.35)
Hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2< 200 mm Hg, best in rapidly reversible
causes of hypoxemia)
88. Mode of Ventilation
Past experience
In part on the capability of ventilators
available to provide support
In part on the condition being treated.
89.
90. Mode of Ventilation
The primary NIV mode is the continuous positive airway
pressure (CPAP), the pressure is initially set at 10 cm H2O and
then adjusted according to SpO2 and clinical tolerance
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) should be considered over
CPAP in patients who showed respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.35),
tachypnea >30/min or a vigorous activity of respiratory
accessory muscles
107. In severe COVID-19, initial CPAP settings have
been suggested 10 cmH2O and 60% oxygen
108.
109. Initial IPAP/EPAP settings
Start at 10 cm water/5 cm water
Pressures less than 8 cm water/4 cm water not
advised as this may be inadequate
Initial adjustments to achieve tidal volume of
5-7 mL/kg (IPAP and/or EPAP)
110.
111. Subsequent adjustments
Increase IPAP by 2 cm water if persistent hypercapnia
Increase IPAP and EPAP by 2 cm water if persistent
hypoxemia
Maximal IPAP limited to 20-25 cm water (avoids
gastric distension, improves patient comfort)
Maximal EPAP limited to 10-15 cm water
112.
113.
114. NIV Failure
A mean VTE higher than
9.5mL/kg over the first four
cumulative hours of NIV
accurately predicted NIV
failure
115.
116. Be careful that NIV may unduly delay
intubation in non-expert hands
We insist on the notion that
intubation should not be delayed