SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 37
Current/New PAT Projects
• Change Overs
• PM Completion
• Metal sticks
• Bulk Management
• Temp Orientation
• Operations
Consistency/Mentoring
• Forecasting
• Marsh printer holds
Old PAT projects will be
closed and tracked as
we move into the new
ones.
Vibratory Waste Tracking
Vibratory improvement waste in dollars line 2
$1,345.18
$733.00
$2,640.00
$2,374.15
$1,234.97
$2,039.40
$1,482.17
$932.00
$979.53
$697.31
$2,763.49
$6,285.06
$2,867.52
$2,530.71
$-
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$5,000.00
$6,000.00
$7,000.00
Aug
Sept
O
ct
N
ov
D
ec
Jan
Feb
M
arch
April
M
ay
June
July
Aug
Sept
Average waste per run
64657744 6425456
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200 Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Runs
avg. per run
Goal to be less
than 300lbs
per run
Identify Safety Hazard PAT
Process Action Team
Team Owner: John King Team Name: Identify Safety Hazards
Team Members Current Process Proposed Process
1 John King 1 See attachments 1 See attachments
2 Duane Gagnon 2 2
3 Ronnel Porter 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
Metrics Identified to Measure Effectiveness Goals
1 Total incident rate for plant 1 Identify safety hazards
2 Before & After pics to identify change 2 Fix safety hazards
3 3
4 4
5 5
Current Projects all Complete
• Board replaced in deck at smoking area
–Complete
• Bottom of stairs by casepacker #2 to
have non-slip tape replaced
–Complete
• Eye wash station leaking at base on
Feed station.
– Complete
PM Completion PAT
Process Action Team
Team Owner: John King Team Name: PM Completion
Team Members Current Process Proposed Process
1 Duane Gagnon 1 See attachments 1 See attachments
2 Frank Brown 2 2
3 John King 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
Metrics Identified to Measure Effectiveness Goals
1 Graphs of PM status, Downtime, & Eff. 1 95% completion
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
PM Completion vs. Plant Efficiency
Started Aug 14th
07’
PM completion vs. Plant Efficiency
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
105.0%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
PM's
Efficiency
Goal is
95% PM
completion
PM Completion vs. Downtime
PM's
93.0%
84.0%
90.0%91.0%
79.0%
91.0%
68.0%
95.5%
91.6%89.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
PM's
Down Time in Minutes
3270 3168
4900
3435
5972
4895
5575
7006
3729
3395
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Downtime
Goal less
than 3,500
minutes
PAT in effect Aug. 14th
Change Over
(Quickie Rinse)
Where the team is at
• Team is currently outlining the process and cycle
timing the steps.
• Due to the slow schedule, there has not been
many chances for cycle timing.
• Have identified 3 changes that require no rinse,
and formed a Matrix showing what to rinse on
the items that need a rinse.
• Focus is the time to rinse the former not mixer.
Mixer will be complete and mix ready if Kanbans
are followed.
Pareto of rinse down
Rinse steps at former
0.56
3.45
5.36
8.9
10.53
48.45
10
0.36
10.5
10
0.56
50
5
8.5
38
23
58
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Roll up
hose
Go get
hose
Turn
on
water
4.85 minutes to
rinse the former
• 4.85 minutes current rinse time per mach..
– Three longest cycles are non value non
needed.
– Saving time in motion could drop these from
158.45 seconds to 150 seconds or less. (Un-
verified)
– Or 2.5 minutes out of the process.
• 2.5 minutes on line 2 = 187.5 lbs retail gained, 250
lbs Food service gained. At 2 per week could result
in the possible gain of 18,000 lbs a year produced
on this line.
Idea’s
• Retractable hose reels at the formers and mixers.
• Water on / off is controlled by a lever instead of a turn
handle.
• 2 pressure washers that are on carts and water line is
hooked up and un-hooked like an air line. The formers
have this connection? Could be a spray hose connected
to the former line.
• 10-30-07 Rinse and plate change done in 18.75 minutes
total gap time (goal is 15 min). Waiting on back half
issues. On this day, saving 2.5 minutes would have
yielded 129.75 lbs by saving 2.5 minutes or 224 lbs by
meeting the 15 minute goal through time saving.
Bulgar Wheat Reduction
P.A.T.
Presented by Stephanie Lobato
B ulge r W he a t M a t e r ia l $ $ V a r ia n c e by M on t h. .
$1,907. 00
$1, 384. 00
$2, 487.00
$2,612.00
$698. 00
$1, 346.00
34 30 32 31 20 27
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07
A v g. LB S . Los s pe r r un .
.
56. 09
46. 13
77.72
84. 26
34.90
49. 85
0. 00
10. 00
20. 00
30. 00
40. 00
50. 00
60. 00
70. 00
80. 00
90. 00
May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct -07
Raw Material Variance 50/50 Oil
Goal
Reduce Material Variance by 50%
Team Members
John King
Barbara Valentine
Dean Shirra
Edith Ganon
And Many More
10/10/07
1.
Warehouse
Receives
2.
Warehouse
issues to
Line
3.
Oil
pumped
4.
Tank #2
5.
Tank #1
6.
Fryer
8.
Lube oil
tote
7.
Back to
Tank #1
Oil Process Flow
Loss vs Number of Run
15 8 13 6 4 8 5 10 4 7
4503
4313
2729
5545
-183
20
-162
1034
2261
350
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct
# of runs
$ Overage
Had a run that the
Form was not filled
out. Had a Meeting
with Operators.
Processes is not being
followed in Sanitation and
Warehouse, talked to Cesar
and still working with Ronnell.
Process Action Team Presentation
Nick Wadsworth
Sample/Log PAT – Tracking
SWING SHIFT - MICRO SAMPLES
94%85%
62% 80%
43%
89%
0
50
100
150
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
Month
SamplesandLogs
TurnedinOnTime
(%)
Logs
Samples
GOAL: 100%
DAY SHIFT - MICRO SAMPLES
94%95% 89%
72%
0
50
100
150
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
Month
SamplesandLogs
TurnedinOnTime
(%)
Logs
Samples
GOAL: 100%
Process Sanitation PAT - Tracking
CN PRODUCT RETESTS (2007)
60%
100%
0%
none 0%
83%
50%
100%
100%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
08/06-
02/07
MAR APR MAY-
SEP
OCT
Month
NoRetestNeeded(%)
Hamburger
Tenders
GOAL: 100%
Pre-op Swabs
93% 92%
96% 96%
94%
95%
89%
85
90
95
100
APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
Month
%Passing
GOAL: 90%
Drains - Environmental Swabs
0/1
10/10
7/10 3/5
6/6 2/2
8/10
1/5
1/1
nonenone nonenonenone
0
50
100
150
AP
RIL
M
AY
JU
N
JU
L
AU
G
SE
P
O
C
T
Month
%Passing
Series1
Series2
GOAL: 90%
Temp Training for Temp
Agencies PAT
Team Members:
Nick Wadsworth
Jennifer Hummel
David Blackner
Barbara Valentine
Ronnell Porter
Cesar Pajuelo
Dean Shirra
Complete - Tracking
• Implemented: Mon. 8-27-07
• Will have a follow-up meeting on 11-29-07
• Waiting on turnover metrics from Strategic
• GMP videos to be ran in the break rm./team rm.
GMP NOTICES
36 34
24 25
16
25 22
159 11 6
0
20
40
M
AR
APR
M
AY
JU
N
JU
L
AU
G
SEP
O
C
T
Month
#ofGMPNotices
Given
Total
Temps
GOAL: 10 total; 5
temps
Mentoring Program PAT
Team Members:
Nick Wadsworth
Jennifer Hummel
David Blackner
Barbara Valentine
Ronnell Porter
Cesar Pajuelo
Dean Shirra
John King
Kurt Geiger
PAT Goal:
To create better skilled/qualified future and
current permanent floor employees, so
that they are more aligned with our current
business model.
Problems with Old Mentor Program
• No time frame for the mentoring
relationship caused the mentors to rush
through the training
• Unqualified mentors were selected
• Lack of supervisor buy-in
• Incomplete mentor training
• In complete mentee training
Criteria for Mentor Selection
1. need to have the necessary knowledge, skills,
abilities (know how all departments function, know
who the key players are)
2. adhere to company policy: attendance, safety, etc.
3. respected by co-workers
4. team player: has been involved with continuous
improvement teams or is interested in becoming
involved
5. able to practice confidentiality with co-workers
6. overall happy about/committed to their job
Last Meeting: 11-1-07
• Finished the design phase of the “Mentor Training”
portion of the project
• # of mentor in pilot program: production (1); quality (1);
sanitation (1); warehouse (2); maintenance (2)
• Mentor training:
– Leadership training including an exercise (done by HR)
– training booklet – GMP’s, safety, 5S/lean/kanban, continuous
improvement (done by safety/quality/mentor PAT member)
• Total of 2 to 4 trainers
• 3-5 hours of training done on Fridays
• Must pass a quiz with 85% or higher
• Management meets with mentors one-on-one before and
after training
Next Meeting: 11-15-07
• Design phase of “Actual Mentoring”
portion of the project
– This has been started
– Process breakdown/brainstorming
Action Plan
Task Responsibility Est. Comp Date
Discuss and decide on framework for
the “Mentor Training” portion
Team DONE
Discuss and decide on framework for
“Actual Mentoring” portion
Team 11-29-07
Design mentor training & quiz Sub-team assignments Dec/Jan, TBD
Design training booklet & quiz Sub-team assignments Dec/Jan, TBD
Write the SOP Sub-team assignments Dec/Jan, TBD
Select mentors Team January, TBD
Brief all supervisors/mgrs. Sub-team assignment January, TBD
Train the first mentors HR/Operations/QA January, TBD
Choose first mentee(s) Team January, TBD
Marsh Printer errors
October 2007
Ronnell Porter
cases
cost
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
October 2007MarshReport
cases
cost
No errors for the month
Total of $400 dollars
In rework over past 2
Months.
Marsh Printer Rework
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
June July August September October
Dollars
Rework
Bulk Management
October 2007
Members
Kurt, Joel & Ron
TOTES
POUNDS
S1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Bulk in October
Goal is 0
meatballs 3 totes 991 lbs
Warehouse caused!!!
Since Start of PAT
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
July August September October
Pounds
Pounds

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (11)

FOODS SLIDE
FOODS SLIDEFOODS SLIDE
FOODS SLIDE
 
2ºe food ii
2ºe food ii2ºe food ii
2ºe food ii
 
Recycling
RecyclingRecycling
Recycling
 
Actions and hobbies 1
Actions and hobbies 1Actions and hobbies 1
Actions and hobbies 1
 
Ai sounds
Ai soundsAi sounds
Ai sounds
 
Seasons and months
Seasons and monthsSeasons and months
Seasons and months
 
Breakfast lunck dinner snack drink
Breakfast lunck dinner snack drinkBreakfast lunck dinner snack drink
Breakfast lunck dinner snack drink
 
Places in a town
Places in a townPlaces in a town
Places in a town
 
Personal pronouns 2nd of primary
Personal pronouns 2nd of primaryPersonal pronouns 2nd of primary
Personal pronouns 2nd of primary
 
Face parts
Face partsFace parts
Face parts
 
Combined PAT Presentations
Combined PAT PresentationsCombined PAT Presentations
Combined PAT Presentations
 

Similar to Combined Pat Presentation Oct - Copy

Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 FinalGurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Singh Kakkar
 
Production Schedule Report 2016-rv
Production Schedule Report 2016-rvProduction Schedule Report 2016-rv
Production Schedule Report 2016-rv
James Thomas
 
AABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blue
AABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blueAABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blue
AABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blue
Tracy Mallios
 
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptxAPRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
nkarthik21
 
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptxAPRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
nkarthik21
 
MVR BEFORE RAMP
MVR BEFORE RAMPMVR BEFORE RAMP
MVR BEFORE RAMP
RAMANA M V
 

Similar to Combined Pat Presentation Oct - Copy (20)

SCM PROJECT
SCM PROJECTSCM PROJECT
SCM PROJECT
 
Juan Martinez, Principal, Profitality - Ergonomics & Engineering: The Secret ...
Juan Martinez, Principal, Profitality - Ergonomics & Engineering: The Secret ...Juan Martinez, Principal, Profitality - Ergonomics & Engineering: The Secret ...
Juan Martinez, Principal, Profitality - Ergonomics & Engineering: The Secret ...
 
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 FinalGurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
 
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptxQuick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
Quick Change Over (ENG)- PPT.pptx
 
Agile Progress Tracking and Code Complete Date Estimation
Agile Progress Tracking and Code Complete Date EstimationAgile Progress Tracking and Code Complete Date Estimation
Agile Progress Tracking and Code Complete Date Estimation
 
Power financials - how we work
Power financials - how we workPower financials - how we work
Power financials - how we work
 
Every Product Every Cycle in Production
Every Product Every Cycle in ProductionEvery Product Every Cycle in Production
Every Product Every Cycle in Production
 
Lean six sigma black belt project by iftakhar
Lean six sigma black belt project   by iftakharLean six sigma black belt project   by iftakhar
Lean six sigma black belt project by iftakhar
 
Production Schedule Report 2016-rv
Production Schedule Report 2016-rvProduction Schedule Report 2016-rv
Production Schedule Report 2016-rv
 
AABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blue
AABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blueAABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blue
AABB - Improving Methods for Matching Single Donor Platelet Production -blue
 
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewProduction & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
 
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptxAPRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
 
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptxAPRIL  -23 TO  Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
APRIL -23 TO Feb 24 FINAL PPT (3).pptx
 
Industrial Engineering in Apparel Industry
Industrial Engineering in Apparel IndustryIndustrial Engineering in Apparel Industry
Industrial Engineering in Apparel Industry
 
Lean - Tight Oil Design & Construction
Lean - Tight Oil Design & ConstructionLean - Tight Oil Design & Construction
Lean - Tight Oil Design & Construction
 
Lean Software Development Is for Everyone
Lean Software Development Is for EveryoneLean Software Development Is for Everyone
Lean Software Development Is for Everyone
 
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of workingOpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
OpenText Live: Modeling your business processes to new ways of working
 
MVR BEFORE RAMP
MVR BEFORE RAMPMVR BEFORE RAMP
MVR BEFORE RAMP
 
Linking Budgets And Resources With Project Timelines
Linking Budgets And Resources With Project TimelinesLinking Budgets And Resources With Project Timelines
Linking Budgets And Resources With Project Timelines
 
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous FlowBatch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
Batch & Queue vs Lean Continuous Flow
 

Combined Pat Presentation Oct - Copy

  • 1. Current/New PAT Projects • Change Overs • PM Completion • Metal sticks • Bulk Management • Temp Orientation • Operations Consistency/Mentoring • Forecasting • Marsh printer holds Old PAT projects will be closed and tracked as we move into the new ones.
  • 2. Vibratory Waste Tracking Vibratory improvement waste in dollars line 2 $1,345.18 $733.00 $2,640.00 $2,374.15 $1,234.97 $2,039.40 $1,482.17 $932.00 $979.53 $697.31 $2,763.49 $6,285.06 $2,867.52 $2,530.71 $- $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $7,000.00 Aug Sept O ct N ov D ec Jan Feb M arch April M ay June July Aug Sept
  • 3. Average waste per run 64657744 6425456 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Runs avg. per run Goal to be less than 300lbs per run
  • 4. Identify Safety Hazard PAT Process Action Team Team Owner: John King Team Name: Identify Safety Hazards Team Members Current Process Proposed Process 1 John King 1 See attachments 1 See attachments 2 Duane Gagnon 2 2 3 Ronnel Porter 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 Metrics Identified to Measure Effectiveness Goals 1 Total incident rate for plant 1 Identify safety hazards 2 Before & After pics to identify change 2 Fix safety hazards 3 3 4 4 5 5
  • 5. Current Projects all Complete • Board replaced in deck at smoking area –Complete • Bottom of stairs by casepacker #2 to have non-slip tape replaced –Complete • Eye wash station leaking at base on Feed station. – Complete
  • 6. PM Completion PAT Process Action Team Team Owner: John King Team Name: PM Completion Team Members Current Process Proposed Process 1 Duane Gagnon 1 See attachments 1 See attachments 2 Frank Brown 2 2 3 John King 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 Metrics Identified to Measure Effectiveness Goals 1 Graphs of PM status, Downtime, & Eff. 1 95% completion 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5
  • 7. PM Completion vs. Plant Efficiency Started Aug 14th 07’ PM completion vs. Plant Efficiency 60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100.0% 105.0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct PM's Efficiency Goal is 95% PM completion
  • 8. PM Completion vs. Downtime PM's 93.0% 84.0% 90.0%91.0% 79.0% 91.0% 68.0% 95.5% 91.6%89.0% 60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0% 100.0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct PM's Down Time in Minutes 3270 3168 4900 3435 5972 4895 5575 7006 3729 3395 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Downtime Goal less than 3,500 minutes PAT in effect Aug. 14th
  • 10. Where the team is at • Team is currently outlining the process and cycle timing the steps. • Due to the slow schedule, there has not been many chances for cycle timing. • Have identified 3 changes that require no rinse, and formed a Matrix showing what to rinse on the items that need a rinse. • Focus is the time to rinse the former not mixer. Mixer will be complete and mix ready if Kanbans are followed.
  • 11. Pareto of rinse down Rinse steps at former 0.56 3.45 5.36 8.9 10.53 48.45 10 0.36 10.5 10 0.56 50 5 8.5 38 23 58 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Roll up hose Go get hose Turn on water 4.85 minutes to rinse the former
  • 12. • 4.85 minutes current rinse time per mach.. – Three longest cycles are non value non needed. – Saving time in motion could drop these from 158.45 seconds to 150 seconds or less. (Un- verified) – Or 2.5 minutes out of the process. • 2.5 minutes on line 2 = 187.5 lbs retail gained, 250 lbs Food service gained. At 2 per week could result in the possible gain of 18,000 lbs a year produced on this line.
  • 13. Idea’s • Retractable hose reels at the formers and mixers. • Water on / off is controlled by a lever instead of a turn handle. • 2 pressure washers that are on carts and water line is hooked up and un-hooked like an air line. The formers have this connection? Could be a spray hose connected to the former line. • 10-30-07 Rinse and plate change done in 18.75 minutes total gap time (goal is 15 min). Waiting on back half issues. On this day, saving 2.5 minutes would have yielded 129.75 lbs by saving 2.5 minutes or 224 lbs by meeting the 15 minute goal through time saving.
  • 15. B ulge r W he a t M a t e r ia l $ $ V a r ia n c e by M on t h. . $1,907. 00 $1, 384. 00 $2, 487.00 $2,612.00 $698. 00 $1, 346.00 34 30 32 31 20 27 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07
  • 16. A v g. LB S . Los s pe r r un . . 56. 09 46. 13 77.72 84. 26 34.90 49. 85 0. 00 10. 00 20. 00 30. 00 40. 00 50. 00 60. 00 70. 00 80. 00 90. 00 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct -07
  • 17. Raw Material Variance 50/50 Oil Goal Reduce Material Variance by 50% Team Members John King Barbara Valentine Dean Shirra Edith Ganon And Many More 10/10/07
  • 18. 1. Warehouse Receives 2. Warehouse issues to Line 3. Oil pumped 4. Tank #2 5. Tank #1 6. Fryer 8. Lube oil tote 7. Back to Tank #1 Oil Process Flow
  • 19. Loss vs Number of Run 15 8 13 6 4 8 5 10 4 7 4503 4313 2729 5545 -183 20 -162 1034 2261 350 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct # of runs $ Overage Had a run that the Form was not filled out. Had a Meeting with Operators. Processes is not being followed in Sanitation and Warehouse, talked to Cesar and still working with Ronnell.
  • 20. Process Action Team Presentation Nick Wadsworth
  • 21. Sample/Log PAT – Tracking SWING SHIFT - MICRO SAMPLES 94%85% 62% 80% 43% 89% 0 50 100 150 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Month SamplesandLogs TurnedinOnTime (%) Logs Samples GOAL: 100% DAY SHIFT - MICRO SAMPLES 94%95% 89% 72% 0 50 100 150 MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Month SamplesandLogs TurnedinOnTime (%) Logs Samples GOAL: 100%
  • 22. Process Sanitation PAT - Tracking CN PRODUCT RETESTS (2007) 60% 100% 0% none 0% 83% 50% 100% 100% 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 08/06- 02/07 MAR APR MAY- SEP OCT Month NoRetestNeeded(%) Hamburger Tenders GOAL: 100% Pre-op Swabs 93% 92% 96% 96% 94% 95% 89% 85 90 95 100 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Month %Passing GOAL: 90% Drains - Environmental Swabs 0/1 10/10 7/10 3/5 6/6 2/2 8/10 1/5 1/1 nonenone nonenonenone 0 50 100 150 AP RIL M AY JU N JU L AU G SE P O C T Month %Passing Series1 Series2 GOAL: 90%
  • 23. Temp Training for Temp Agencies PAT Team Members: Nick Wadsworth Jennifer Hummel David Blackner Barbara Valentine Ronnell Porter Cesar Pajuelo Dean Shirra
  • 24. Complete - Tracking • Implemented: Mon. 8-27-07 • Will have a follow-up meeting on 11-29-07 • Waiting on turnover metrics from Strategic • GMP videos to be ran in the break rm./team rm. GMP NOTICES 36 34 24 25 16 25 22 159 11 6 0 20 40 M AR APR M AY JU N JU L AU G SEP O C T Month #ofGMPNotices Given Total Temps GOAL: 10 total; 5 temps
  • 25. Mentoring Program PAT Team Members: Nick Wadsworth Jennifer Hummel David Blackner Barbara Valentine Ronnell Porter Cesar Pajuelo Dean Shirra John King Kurt Geiger
  • 26. PAT Goal: To create better skilled/qualified future and current permanent floor employees, so that they are more aligned with our current business model.
  • 27. Problems with Old Mentor Program • No time frame for the mentoring relationship caused the mentors to rush through the training • Unqualified mentors were selected • Lack of supervisor buy-in • Incomplete mentor training • In complete mentee training
  • 28. Criteria for Mentor Selection 1. need to have the necessary knowledge, skills, abilities (know how all departments function, know who the key players are) 2. adhere to company policy: attendance, safety, etc. 3. respected by co-workers 4. team player: has been involved with continuous improvement teams or is interested in becoming involved 5. able to practice confidentiality with co-workers 6. overall happy about/committed to their job
  • 29. Last Meeting: 11-1-07 • Finished the design phase of the “Mentor Training” portion of the project • # of mentor in pilot program: production (1); quality (1); sanitation (1); warehouse (2); maintenance (2) • Mentor training: – Leadership training including an exercise (done by HR) – training booklet – GMP’s, safety, 5S/lean/kanban, continuous improvement (done by safety/quality/mentor PAT member) • Total of 2 to 4 trainers • 3-5 hours of training done on Fridays • Must pass a quiz with 85% or higher • Management meets with mentors one-on-one before and after training
  • 30. Next Meeting: 11-15-07 • Design phase of “Actual Mentoring” portion of the project – This has been started – Process breakdown/brainstorming
  • 31. Action Plan Task Responsibility Est. Comp Date Discuss and decide on framework for the “Mentor Training” portion Team DONE Discuss and decide on framework for “Actual Mentoring” portion Team 11-29-07 Design mentor training & quiz Sub-team assignments Dec/Jan, TBD Design training booklet & quiz Sub-team assignments Dec/Jan, TBD Write the SOP Sub-team assignments Dec/Jan, TBD Select mentors Team January, TBD Brief all supervisors/mgrs. Sub-team assignment January, TBD Train the first mentors HR/Operations/QA January, TBD Choose first mentee(s) Team January, TBD
  • 32. Marsh Printer errors October 2007 Ronnell Porter
  • 33. cases cost 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 October 2007MarshReport cases cost No errors for the month Total of $400 dollars In rework over past 2 Months.
  • 36. TOTES POUNDS S1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Bulk in October Goal is 0 meatballs 3 totes 991 lbs Warehouse caused!!!
  • 37. Since Start of PAT 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 July August September October Pounds Pounds