Occupational safety and health (OSH), also commonly referred to as occupational health and safety (OHS), occupational health, or occupational safety, is a multidisciplinary field concerned with the safety, health, and welfare of people at work (i.e. in an occupation). These terms also refer to the goals of this field, so their use in the sense of this article was originally an abbreviation of occupational safety and health program/department etc.
Nanded Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
L6 - Hazard Analysis.ppt
1. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY &
HEALTH
HAZARD ANALYSIS
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR PRACHI DESSAI, DON BOSCO COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
1
2. DEFINITIONS
• Hazard - condition or combination of conditions
that, if left uncorrected, may lead to an accident,
illness, or property damage.
• A hazard analysis is a process used to assess
risk.
• The results of a hazard analysis is the
identification of unacceptable risks and the
selection of means of controlling or eliminating
them.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
2
3. TYPES OF HAZARD ANALYSIS
• Preliminary hazard analysis (PHA) is
conducted to identify potential hazards and
prioritize them according to the (1) likelihood of
an accident or injury being caused by the hazard
and (2) severity of injury, illness, or property
damage that could result if the hazard caused an
accident.
• Detailed hazard analysis involves the
application of analytical, inductive, and
deductive methods.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
3
4. FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS OF ANALYSIS
• FMEA proceeds as follows:
1. Critically examine the system in question.
2. Divide the system into its various components.
3. Examine each individual component and record all of the various ways in which the components
may fail.
4. Rate each potential failure according to the degree of hazard posed (0 No hazard, 1 Slight, 2
Moderate, 3 Extreme, 4 Severe 5- extremely severe).
5. Examine all potential failures for each individual component of the system and decide what effect
the failures could have.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
4
5. D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
5
6. HAZARD AND OPERABILITY REVIEW (HAZOP)
• Forming a team of experienced
• The safety and health professional should chair the team and
serve as a facilitator.
• The chair’s role is
record the ideas of team members
make sure that one member does not dominate or
intimidate other members
encourage maximum participation from all members
assist members in combining ideas where appropriate to
form better ideas.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
6
7. HAZARD AND OPERABILITY REVIEW (HAZOP)
• A HAZOP proceeds in a step-by-step manner. These steps are summarized as follows:
1. Select the process or system to be analyzed.
2. Form the team of experts.
3. Explain the HAZOP process to all team members.
4. Establish goals and timeframes.
5. Conduct brainstorming sessions.
6. Summarize all input
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
7
8. HAZOP TEAM
Name Alternative Role
Study Leader Chairman Experienced in HAZOP but not directly
involved in the design
Ensures that the method is followed carefully
Recorder Secretary Ensures that problems are documented and
recommendations are passed on
Designer Representative of the team who has
designed the process
To explain any design details and to provide
further information
User Representative who will be working
on the process
To consider it in use and question its
operability
Specialist - Some one with relevant Technical Knowledge
Maintainer - Some one concerned with maintenance
process
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
8
9. HUMAN ERROR ANALYSIS
• Predict human error, not to review what has occurred.
• Although the records of past accidents can be studied to identify trends that can, in turn, be used to
predict accidents, this should be done as part of an accident investigation.
• HEA should be used to identify hazards before they cause accidents.
• Two approaches to HEA can be effective:
(1) observing employees at work and noting hazards (the task analysis approach)
(2) actually performing job tasks to get a firsthand feel for hazards.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
9
10. TECHNIC OF OPERATIONS REVIEW
• Analysis method that allows supervisors and employees to work together to analyze workplace
accidents, failures, and incidents.
• STEPS TO CONDUCT TOR
Establish the TOR team.
Conduct a roundtable
Identify one major systematic factor that led to, or played a significant role in, causing the accident or
incident.
Use the group consensus to respond to a sequence of yes/no options
Evaluate identified factors
Develop corrective or preventive strategies for each factor..
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
10
11. FAULT TREE ANALYSIS
• Fault tree analysis (FTA) can be used to predict and prevent accidents or as an investigative tool after
the fact.
• A fault tree is built using special symbols, some derived from Boolean algebra.
• FTA analysis involves five steps:
Define the undesired event to study.
Obtain an understanding of the system.
Construct the fault tree.
Evaluate the fault .
Control the hazards identified.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
11
12. D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
12
13. Other train
on track
Driver fails to apply
brakes approaching
danger signal
Hazard H1:
Train stop fails
Train travelling too fast
as approaches signal
Hazard H2:
Speed trap fails
Accident A1:
Collision occurs
Train passes
signal at danger
Automatic protection
system fails
Speed Trap
Failure
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
13
14. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH
JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
14
15. JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS
A job hazard analysis is a technique that
focuses on job tasks as a way to identify
hazards before they occur.
It focuses on the relationship between the
worker, the task, the tools, and the work
environment.
After uncontrolled hazards are identified, take
action to eliminate them or reduce risk.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
15
16. JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS
Performing a job hazard analysis is one of the
best methods to develop safe work procedures
for the equipment that is operated.
The JHA can also be used to train employees
in the hazards associated with task and what
control measures should be practiced.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
16
17. JHA TEAM
A Job Hazard Analysis requires the
cooperation of all parties involved that
includes:
Safety Professional
Engineers-Technical Advisor
Supervisors-Frontline Personnel
responsible for making change
Employee-Person most familiar with job
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
17
18. PRIORITIZATION OF JHA
Jobs with the highest injury and illness rates
Jobs that have the potential to cause serious injury
Jobs in which one simple human error could cause
injury
Jobs complex enough to have written instructions
Jobs that are new to you facility
Jobs that significantly had changes in process
technology or procedures
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
18
19. STEPS FOR JHA
1. Involve Employees
2. Review accident history
3. Conduct preliminary job review
4. Outline the steps or tasks
5. List, rank, and set priorities for hazardous jobs
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
19
20. INVOLVEMENT OF EMPLOYEES
They have a unique understanding of the job, and this knowledge is invaluable for finding
hazards.
Involving employees will help minimize oversights, ensure a quality analysis.
Get workers to “buy in” to the solutions because they will share ownership
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
20
21. OUTLINE THE STEPS
Watch the employee perform the job and list each step as the worker takes it.
Be sure to record enough information to describe each job action without getting overly
detailed.
Avoid making the breakdown of steps so detailed that it becomes unnecessarily long or so
broad that it does not include basic steps.
Review the job steps with the employee to make sure you have not omitted something.
Include the employee in all phases of the analysis—from reviewing the job steps and
procedures to discussing uncontrolled hazards and recommended solutions.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
21
22. IDENTIFYING THE HAZARDS
A job hazard analysis is an exercise in detective work. Your goal is to discover the following:
What can go wrong?
What are the consequences?
How could it arise?
What are other contributing factors?
How likely is it that the hazard will occur?
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
22
23. D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
23
24. D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
24
25. D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
25
26. COMMON HAZARDS IN THE WORKPLACE
Stressor Hazard Type Hazard Type Hazard Type
Chemical Corrosive Fire
Explosion
Toxic
Electrical Shock Short Circuit Fire-Static
Mechanical Moving Parts Failure Noise
Pressure
Ergonomic Strain Human Error Fatigue
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
26
27. COMMON HAZARDS IN THE WORKPLACE
Stressor Hazard Type Hazard Type Hazard
Type
Radiation Ionizing Non
Ionizing
Contact Struck By Struck Against Caught In
Environment Temp. Visibility Weather
Misc. Slips Trips Falls
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
27
28. CONTROLLING THE HAZARDS
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
28
29. CONTROLLING THE HAZARDS
The most effective controls are engineering controls that physically change a machine or
work environment to prevent employee exposure to the hazard.
The more reliable or less likely a hazard control can be circumvented, the better.
If this is not feasible, administrative controls may be appropriate.
This may involve changing how employees do their jobs.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
29
30. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
Administrative controls include the following:
Written operating procedures, work permits, and safe work practices;
Exposure time limitations (used most commonly to control heat stress and ergonomic
hazards);
Monitoring the use of highly hazardous materials;
Alarms, signs, and warnings;
Buddy system; and training
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
30
31. PPE
Personal Protective Equipment is acceptable as a control method in the following circumstances:
When engineering controls are not feasible or do not totally eliminate the hazard;
While engineering controls are being developed;
When safe work practices do not provide sufficient additional protection; and
During emergencies when engineering controls may not be feasible.
D. L. GOETSCH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR TECHNOLOGISTS; ENGINEERS
AND MANAGERS
31