Write An Essay On The Rwanda Genocide

Write An Essay On The Rwanda Genocide
In the end of the Boy in the Striped Pajamas, it says " Of course this happened a long time ago and nothing like this could ever happen again." (Boyne,
2005, page 216). This statement is irony at its best. Genocide is the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural
group. This killing of entire groups of people has happened all through history, if you think about how long humans have been on the earth, the
holocaust which happened from 1933–1945, is not that long ago, and there have been many genocides between then and present day, including
Cambodia 1975, Al–Anfal 1980, Rwanda 1990, and Bosnia 1991. For instance, the Darfur genocide 2003–20011 wasn't even 10 years ago. There are
also many similarities...show more content...
If you are to look at many genocides throughout history, these are three of the main factors that stay the same. A weak government after some type
of conflict, A group of people blamed for something they had no control over, and the government or other governments ignoring denying that
anything is happening. ". . .only the victims and survivors can truly comprehend the awfulness of that time and place; the rest of us live on the other
side of the fence, staring through from our own comfortable place, trying in our own clumsy ways to make sense of it all." (Boyne, 2005, page). The
quote from the boy in the striped pajamas is suppose to make people think about but also understand that you can't fully know what happened to those
people without being there. Bruno dies in a gas chamber at the end of the Boy in the Striped Pajamas, along with the other in the concentration camp.
Bruno was wearing striped pajamas because of this no one knew who he was. This shows that in the end there is no difference between Shmuel and
Bruno, no difference regardless of religion and race, they were just as human as each
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Causes And Effects Of The Rwandan Genocide
History Assignment Tim Human 24 October
Rwanda Genocide
Introduction:
For my research task on the Rwandan Genocide I will be discussing the causes and effects of the Rwandan Genocide and I will be stating the events
prior to the genocide. My research will be focused on three main questions, what caused the Genocide?What were the events prior to the Genocide?
And what effects did the Genocide have on the countries involved?I will be talking about belgium and their colonialism as well as the Tutsis and the
Hutu's.
Historical Context:
The two groups (the hutus and the tutsis) lived in peace with one another. Tutsis being landowners and Hutus being workers of the land because of their
traditional grouping. Their relationship was disrupted by the Belgians when they colonised Rwanda.
Analysis:...show more content...
Rwanda was inhabited by two main groups, the Hutus and the Tutsis. The Hutus were traditionally crop growers whereas the Tutsis were herdsmen.
This division of labour meant that the Hutus far outnumbered the Tutsis. This meant that the two groups were separated not literally but figuratively
in their roles of labour. When Rwanda was colonised by Belgium, a wedge was forced in between these two groups fully separating them. This was
because the practice of the colonial administrators was to select those who were more privileged or educated as factors for the decision of who would
run the country and who would be run. The belgians chose the Tutsis; tall, landowners and to the Europeans eye they were more political by
appearance and nature. THis introduction of classification brought an unbalance to Rwanda. Some Tutsis began to behave like aristocrats and the Hutu
to feel like they were peasants or

Case Study: Rwanda Genocide Essay
Case Study: Rwanda
The conflict in Rwanda is probably the most well known and documented case of genocide since the holocaust. Through years of discrimination based
on ethnic and class based differences, the population of Rwanda has been constantly entrenched in periods of fighting, refuge and genocide. In the
following essay we will explore the background of the conflict. Specifically the historical implications, the parties involved the reasons for the fighting
and the result of conflict. Next we will try to investigate some of the theories related to the conflict and discuss views of prominent authors who have
attempted to define the reasoning behind this most incomprehensible conflict.
Historical Background
The origin of the...show more content...
The identity cards remained in use into the post–independence era, and unfortunately also provided central assistance to the crazed militias who would
later carry out the atrocities on the Rwandan population.
After World War II, the trend of decolonization was sweeping Africa and the pacific and it was then that the Tutsis would lead a campaign for
independence from the Belgians (Cook, 2006). With the opportunity for independence, Rwandans like in any other country fighting for independence at
the time, divided into parties vying for the lead role in government. While the Tutsis historically had privilege to this position, before decolonization
occurred the Belgians began switching out Tutsi representatives for Hutus out of fear that a majority Hutu party would come out victorious (Rwanda,
2008). The Belgian suspicion of a Hutu overthrow came to fruition when the Hutus took control of Rwanda in 1959 (Rwanda, 2008). After the
overthrow, vengeful Hutu militias murdered about 15,000 Tutsis, and more than 100,000 Tutsis fled to bordering countries, primarily Uganda and
Burundi (Cook, 2006). The Tutsis remaining in Rwanda were stripped of their possessions and positions of power under the regime of JuvГ©nal
Habyarimana, who came to power in 1973 (January, 2007).
Background Post–Independence/Parties
During Habyarimana's rule as president an estimated one

Essay On Rwanda Genocide
The Rwandan Genocide: Crime against humanity
Throughout history, human beings have revolutionized the world using technology and other innovative means. However, it goes without saying on
the opposite side of the coin that although people are capable of creating phenomenal things, people are just as capable of destruction. For as long as
there has been differences amongst people in society, there has always been discrimination against people in regards to a certain race, class, ethnicity,
gender, sexual orientation, and etc. In the most extreme cases, differences of groups of people in society have resulted in mass persecution through the
systematic destruction know as genocide. In society, atrocious genocides aren't uncommon events. Since the beginning of time, people have participated
in horrific acts of injustice against one another from the first modern genocide of "the 13th century, when heretics in Medieval Europe were massacred
during Albigensian Crusade" (History 1) to the most recent, the Rwandan Genocide. The...show more content...
This made the Hutus alter their strategy completely and they decided to exterminate the Tutsis completely to get ride of opposition, so that they will
remain in power.
During the Rwandan genocide, systematic rape was also practiced "as a weapon of war" (End Genocide). There was around 250,000 to 500,000
women raped and it was done to destroy the Tutsi by emotional pain. The Hutus wanted the woman to "die of sadness" and to cripple them with health
problems. In most cases, the women were murdered after being raped. Eventually, in the span of 100 days, the RPF started to "make gains on both the
battlefield and in the negotiations led by Tanzania". In the beginning of July, the RPF gained authority over the majority of the country and many
Hutus left the

Rwanda Genocide Sociology
The term genocide encompasses some of the darkest times in the history of the world. There is no definitive answer as to what drives one sect of
society to try and eliminate another based purely on their cultural, racial, national or political affiliation either by birth or by choice. During World
War II, between six and eleven million Jewish people were systematically exterminated by the Nazis. Although it was the most prolific of genocides, it
was not the first or the last of this atrocity to occur. In 1994, genocide occurred in the African nation of Rwanda. At the time it happened, the world
paid little heed while almost a million people were killed. After the incident, the reaction of the United Nations came under scrutiny as researchers
...show more content...
This had to do with the peacekeepers that were sent to Rwanda, and how long they should stay there. The UN wanted to pull out troops, but they
did not want to be hated. During the time the plan was being approved President Clinton did not want to commit any forces to Rwanda. Because of
this, the US was scrutinized by the media and asked why they said no, but they did try to help clean up the situation. Althorugh troops were sent,
they did not arrive until the middle of July. Though they were late, this did help to receive any other refugees to get away and to clam the
genocide. But only fifty US vehicles were really sent to help them get out, the extra troops were sent by the UN Secretary General for
peacekeeping duties along with 200 artillery pieces for a thousand men. Thanks to all the plans that had been approved and suggested by others to
appease the situation thought many have died a few were saved thanks to UN efforts and as all know thans to a certain owner of a hotel who
convinced a UN officer to take refugees out of Rwanda despite the risk of taking them out. There were many road blocks that were swarming with
Hutus trying to stop them , but it was too late and because of this many more lives were saved so the UN sending peacekeepers actually saved lives
CONCLUSION In conclusion, the Rwandan genocide clearly stemmed from decades of feuds and led to the death of over 800,000 people. Some
people think the genocide could have been prevented if the United States and the United Nations would have done more sooner. Looking at the history
of Alexander

Research Paper On Rwanda Genocide
Rwanda Genocide
The Rwanda genocide is one of the worst genocides in human history. Genocide is a mass murder of a group of people depending on their race or
religion. Rwanda is in Eastern part of Africa near the equator. There were many terrible causes and people who contributed to the outcome of this
terrible genocide. There are several causes to this genocide, but it happened very fast. It was April 6th, 1994 when the president, Habyarimana's plane
was shot down with a ground to air missile when it was just about to land at Kigali airport. It was believed that Hutu extremists shot down the plane,
but it was never proven. When it started it was within 24 hours when road blocks started going up and checkpoints were people were getting killed.
When people went to these road blocks and if they were Tutsis their ID was seized and they were poled out of their car and killed with machetes, but
some taller and thinner Hutus were thought to be Tutsis and were also killed. These road blocks...show more content...
The first person arrested was the past mayor of Taba, Jean–Paul Akayesu in 1998 who was convicted of genocide. Over 120,000 people are jailed. A
day after Jean Paul Akayesu the prime minister of Rwanda Jean Kambanda with multiple convictions of genocide and crimes against humanity and
conspires. After the genocide it is believed that 750,000 Tutsis, 50,000 moderate Hutus and 10,000 to over 100,000 Hutus were killed. In 2002 the
Rwanda government released a statement saying that 1,074,017 people were killed. Now the RPF controls the government, but they have turned a lot
of blind eyes on RPF soldiers that did inhumane actions. The economy is having a tough time growing thanks to the genocide and loses of land.
Rwanda is getting back on its feet and even though it's facing hard times it is still trying to

Introduction When the Belgian colonizers entered Rwanda in 1924, they created an ethnic classification between the Hutu and the Tutsi, two tribes
who used to live together as one. After independence in 1962, there was a constant power struggle between the two tribes. Former Canadian Prime
Minister, Jean–Pierre ChrГ©tien described the situation as "tribalism without tribes." (Destexhe, 1995) There were many signs leading towards
genocide, yet the nations in power chose to ignore them. From April 6, 1994 until mid–July, a time spanning approximately of 100 days, 800,000
people were murdered when the Hutu attacked the Tutsi. No foreign aid came to the rescue until it was too late. Ten years after the genocide the United
Nations was still...show more content...
In 1993 the Hutu president, Habyarimana started to use radio broadcasts to try and create a feeling of hatred amongst the Hutu against the Tutsi. One
example was, "The grave is only half full. Who will help us fill it?" or in 1994, "By 5 May, the country must be completely cleansed of Tutsis."
(Destexhe, 1995) President Habyarimana issued threats on two levels. Publicly, the Tutsi race was threatened of annihilation. Yet the radio broadcasts
also made the Hutus feel as if they were under threat, and must attack the Tutsis.
When on April 6, 1994 Hutu President Habyarimana died after his plane was shot down, Rwanda's extremist Hutu immediately sent out an order for
Rwanda's mayors, militias, and death squads to start killing the Tutsis. From there, the Interhamwe (those who attack together), an unofficial militia
group of about 30,000 fighters, was organized. (Gale, 2010) Those in power started to create death lists, hunt down the Tutsi on these lists and kill
them. Radios broadcasted the command for all Hutus to join the campaign to kill the Tutsis. The speed and level of violence shocked many as Hutu
gangs armed with swords, spears, and machetes attacked the Tutsis. The Tutsis hid in hospitals and churches until the Hutu police came, tearing down
doors and killing more. It was estimated that 20,000 people were murdered per day.
The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a group of exiled Tutsis and sympathetic Hutus that formed in 1988 came into action. They had to

The Rwanda Genocide Essay
The world's history has been tainted by many instances of violence targeted at specific groups of people due to either their ethnicity or beliefs. This
paper will discuss the characteristics of the Rwanda Genocide and the Jewish Holocaust. The Rwanda Genocide targeted the Tutsis because of their
ethnicity, while the Holocaust targeted the Jews because of their ethnicity and religion.
To really understand the Rwandan Genocide and the Final Solution, one must understand the background of the two exterminated peoples. The Tutsis
are an ethnic group that resides in the African Great Lakes region. During the Europeans settlements in Rwanda, the colonists need an identifier to
separate the population of Rwanda. Belgium settlers defined "Tutsi"...show more content...
(Hitler's Book "Mein Kampf") The Nazis claimed that the Jewish people and religion was the source of their downfall, and the genocide of the Jewish
people was their only option.
Propaganda for the Rwanda Genocide began when the RPF (Rwandan Patriotic Front) invaded Rwanda in 1990. Thus, the Hutu Power Movement
began. A group of government officers and officials began a magazine called "Kangura", which spread anti–Tutsi propaganda. The Hutu Ten
Commandments, which were published in the Kangura, was an example of racist guidelines for the Hutus if they ever came into contact with a Tutsi.
By 1990, the Rwandan army began arming its civilians with swords and clubs under the pretense of self defense. These weapons became the main
tools used in the genocide. After the ceasefire between the Rwanda government and the RPF in 1992, Hutu extremists in the Rwandan government and
the army began to plot against the President in fear of allowing the Tutsis to participate in governmental issues. The extremists began a new radios
station named "Radio TГ©lГ©vision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLMC), which broadcasted racist propaganda against Tutsis. Hutu extremist leaders
also staged or reported false events to convince the Hutu population that the Tutsis were accomplices of the RPF. (Propaganda and Practice) The
Holocaust, on the other hand, utilized many more ways of propaganda.

Rwandan Genocide Essay
The formation of the United Nations in 1945 was marked by an international outcry to 'never again' idly bear witness to the genocidal atrocities
capable of man, as so harshly revealed in the nature of the Holocaust. In doing so, all member states actively sought to facilitate discussion in the
United Nations as a world forum, in order to achieve both international and intra–national security. While the United Nations has achieved various
successes in the international community, the international entity and its' member states are subject to various legal and moral flaws, weakening
response to conflicts in the contemporary era of international relations. These failures are exemplified tragically in the response to the Rwandan
genocide in...show more content...
The genocide was partly founded in ethno–politics, as a group of exiled Hutus, the Rwandan Patriotic Front, invaded Rwanda from Uganda in order to
reclaim their power within Rwanda from the Tutsi peoples.
The turbulent relationship between the two groups was founded in pre–colonial, colonial, post–colonial and modern relationships and frameworks. The
pre–colonial ethnic distinctions of Hutu, Tutsi and Twa, defined by social and economic organization were furthered by colonization, during which
rigid segregation continued to plague political and social Rwandan frameworks. These distinctions were hypothesized and glorified by the academic
community during colonization as the Hamitic hypothesis began to gain prominence. The theory was based upon the idea of a scientific racial
supremacy separating the three tribes, praising the Tutsi pastoralists as being naturally destined to be the ruling group (Codere 1962, 48). Further, the
premise was of distinguishable, observable traits between the two groups, in a practice often conceptualized as scientific racism. As decolonization
became a more common shift in the international realm, the second colonizers of Rwanda, the state of Belgium, began to maintain authority over the
territory. The Rwandan Revolution of 1959, saw a dramatic switch in the Rwandan power structure, as the Hutu majority suddenly rose to prominence
and the Tutsi were excluded from government with active

Genocide in Rwanda Essay
Genocide is "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, ethnic, political, or cultural group". In Rwanda for example, the Hutu–led government
embraced a new program that called for the country's Hutu people to murder anyone that was a Tutsi (Gourevitch, 6). This new policy of one ethnic
group (Hutu) that was called upon to murder another ethnic group (Tutsi) occurred during April through June of 1994 and resulted in the genocide of
approximately 800,000 innocent people that even included women and children of all ages. In this paper I will first analyze the origins/historical
context regarding the discontent amongst the Hutu and Tutsi people as well as the historical context as to why major players in the international...show
more content...
The Belgians also decreed that Tutsis should be the only ones in power and thus removed Hutus from positions of power and excluded them from
higher education (Arraras). "By assuring the Tutsis' monopoly of power the Belgians set the stage for future conflict in Rwanda" (Arraras). The Tutsis
were enjoying their status as being superior to the Hutus but all that changed in 1959 with the Hutu revolution and so in 1960 and 1961 the Hutus
won the elections. Since then, ethnic tensions had always been brewing between the Hutus and the Tutsis. However the tensions escalated when
Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, was shot down above Kigali airport on April 6, 1994. I consider this to be a form of political
violence because someone or a group that opposed this President which represented only the political interests as well as the viability of the Hutus
had to be killed in order for another group possibly the Tutsis to fill the vacuum of power left by the Hutu president. The Hutus blamed the
assassination of their president on the Tutsis and in turn sparked an all out massacre waged on to the Tutsi people. Although it is sometimes viewed
that major players in the international community did not get involved in the conflict between the Hutus and the Tutsis I argue that in some form or
fashion they did. For example, prior to the genocide of 1994 the United States had formed an alliance with the Tutsis, they even gave Paul Kagame,
co–founder of the

International Response To Rwanda Genocide
The international response to this crisis was absolutely abysmal. Despite having had clear knowledge of the events occurring in Rwanda, the
international community, namely the United States and the United Nations, remained unresponsive, allowing the genocide to proceed unabated. In late
April 1994, amid urgent calls for an increase of forces, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution 912, which, despite their stated, 'deep
concern' for the Tutsi people, withdrew 90% of UN troops from Rwanda, leaving only 270 soldiers in the country to protect civilians from genocide.
NSA declassified documents clearly show how the United States willfully chose to be bystanders to the conflict that decimated the Tutsi population of
Rwanda, having

An Essay On The Rwandan Genocide
of the genocide. During this genocide, 11% of the Rwandan population was lost. This is the highest casualty rate of a population in history from
non–natural causes (Prunier 265). "Many of those seeking refuge had been involved with either the armed forces of Rwanda or Hutu militia groups,
and some were fugitives of justice that had committed genocide" (Adelman). "Approximately 1 million Hutu refugees fled Rwanda to Zaire, which is
now Dem. Republic of Congo, and another half million fled to Tanzania" (Adelman). About 300,000 of the refugees leaving the country was Hutu
killer (Prunier 265). Even though this genocide had a main target group, it was also the killers that were affected. After the Rwandan Genocide several
militia leaders were tried in a court. "One significant result was the establishment of a special international criminal tribunal to indict and try
perpetrators of the Rwandan...show more content...
It is disappointing that the history of Rwanda,..., may still repeat itself. I may not have the power or influence to stop this tragedy, but I am not
going to sit idly by and watch another tragedy continue to unfold before my eyes" US House2 5). Genocide has been around for centuries and
unfortunately countries such as Rwanda had to witness the atrocities of genocide. Unlike the holocaust, the Hutus main goal was to slaughter as
many Tutsi as they could in as little as 100 days. It is equally important to remember those that suffered from this historical event will never forget it.
The Rwandan genocide was a 100 day massacre that was started by the Hutu President's place accident, which was blamed on the Tutsi from previous
political disputes. All in all, the question still remains whether the Hutus shot their own president's plane down to start a war of massacre or if the Tutsi
were really trying to regain

Essay On Genocide In Rwanda
Heartbreak and Loss Inside a Nation
Harmony turned power hungry. The Tutsis, tall warrior people, invaded the homeland of the Hutu farmers. The Tutsis had fewer numbers. Yet, they still
conquered the Hutus. There was a compromise: if the Tutsis raised the crops the Hutus would in turn protect them. They lived as one, spoke the same
language, and intermarried. However, when Belgium withdrew their troops a power vacuum spread rapidly throughout the rugged Rwandan plains.
The Tutsis and Hutus civil war turned into a mass genocide that lasted for months. Some 600 years after, the Hutus pushed aside theTutsi and finally
regained their rightfully deserved control. Now, Rwanda is at peace, but concerned with AIDS and other diseases. It is made lots...show more content...
Instead of confronting the Hutus with words or nonviolent protests, the Tutsis began a warfare. I learned that no more than half of the Tutsi andHutu
groups can read and write in their native language. Belgium and Germany must have seen this as an advantage. The Tutsis who held military power
inherited it from the colonia lpower and don't want to share fully with the Hutus. A news reporter stated, "The German and Belgian invaders shrewdly
manipulated the Tutsi and Hutu with the age–old, highly effective "divide and rule" strategy." If the Tutsis and Hutus had been educated they would
have realized that. If they had a higher education they could have run for office, instead of electing a king. They were smart enough to form an army,
train children with deadly weapons, and kill millions of people. The only difference between the two groups is economical, rather than ethical. Once
they began the assassinations they could not stop the slaughter. At first the Hutus were victims of the atrocity, but once they regained power terror
struck down on the Tutsis. All the unfair distribution of resources such as, wealth, and education powered their fight. Segregation was also a fuel that
was ignited every time they were called "dark

Rwanda Genocide Essay
Imagine living a life of fear, turmoil, with death all around. Hearing gun shots being fired, death chants, machete use, dead bodies everywhere.
Afraid to close your eyes at night to rest, yet more afraid to wake up in the morning. To sustain your life and the life of your loved ones you must
hide out, kill others, watch your neighbors be killed at the hands of the enemy. Knowing if you are caught you could be forced to murder your own
family, be raped, be held captive, be starved to death, and most likely be killed. In 1994, this was the life many faced in Rwanda. "Rwanda has become
a synonym for one of the worst genocides of the 20th century (Lemarchand, (n.d.), p. 483).
Rwanda is a small country located near the center of Africa. Kigali is the capital which is located in the center of the country. In 1991, the population
of Rwanda was 7.7 million, according to the national census. Rwanda was made up of three ethnic groups 90 percent of the population was Hutu, 9
percent was Tutsi, and 1 percent was Twa (Worldwithoutgenocide.org, 2013). A civil war broke out between the two major ethnic groups the Hutus
and the Tutsis, which led to a large–scale...show more content...
Rwanda's colonial period, the Belgians chose the minority Tutsis over the Hutus which created a legacy of tension that erupted into violence. In 1959,
ethnic violence was directed against the Tutsi chiefs erupted, killing hundreds of people, both Tutsis and Hutus. This violence ended rather quickly
with assistance from the Belgian troops. This was the beginning of the first phase of the Hutu–led revolutionary process that forced over 200,000 Tutsis
to depart from Rwanda. By 1961, the victorious Hutus had banished Rwanda's Tutsi monarchy, declaring the country a republic. Rwanda gained
independence from Belgium in July of 1962 (History.com,

Issues In Rwanda Genocide
The absence within the literature of the central pillars and their composed themes creates problems when trying to address current and future contention
between the international community and Rwanda. By relying largely on the genocide guilt card, issues important to Rwanda are sometimes either
overlooked or plainly forgotten. The result is miscommunication and misunderstandings that complicate a delicate situation. For example is the
previously mentioned debate on term limits for President Kagame. Despite the thesis not discussing the third term debate except for the mention in
Chapter Two, it is an important event that will help continue the trend of howRwanda views the actions and decisions by international actors.
The debate on whether...show more content...
The issue of abandonment will be brought to the forefront but not in terms of the genocide guilt card. Rwandan officials will believe that the same
states that abandoned Rwanda before and during the genocide have little ability to criticise the continuation of the only person who did not leave the
country during its darkest periods. President Kagame as leader of the RPF led the campaign to put an end to the massacres in response to international
abandonment of the genocide. This might be easily misinterpreted as Rwanda promoting genocide guilt to deflect criticism of electing Kagame for
more terms than the current Constitution allows. But at the heart of the issue is the distrust of the international community. They rather listen to and
trust Kagame who did not abandoned the country rather than the countries that did. How he ended the genocide and led the nation into wars with the
DRC is met with the other two themes. Unlike the international community, which seems to disappoint Rwanda by not properly combating the FDLR ,
Kagame is credited for promoting the security of Rwandans by fighting the FDLR and other extremist groups bent on harming Rwanda. These military
campaigns are all through a central belief that Rwanda needs to be self–reliant for its own protection and development. Since the 2012 M23 allegations
and aid withdrawal by donors, Rwandans are increasingly accepting President Kagame's call for self–reliance. As discussed in Chapter Six, his rhetoric
campaigns against foreign aid, Kagame continues to instruct Rwandans to trust that economic development has to come from within Rwanda rather
than continual acceptance of foreign aid. Ronal Nkusi commented how the reduction of aid went beyond just the realm of rhetoric to include it as a
belief to be held by all government officials. This

Essay On Rwanda Genocide
The Rwandan Genocide Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. The Hutu
extremists did not like the Tutsi because of the last few years under oppressive Tutsi rule; they believed many of the Tutsi citizens supported the rebel
group Rwandan Patriotic Front. From April to July 1994, over 800,000 Tutsi and thousands ofHutu moderates were killed all within a period of 100
days during the Rwandan Genocide.
During the 1990's the Tutsi and Hutu were already in a bad place after recently being under oppressive Tutsis rule. The Hutu extremist blamed all
their country's social and economic problems on the Tutsi people. A civil war was caused after a group of Rwandan exiles formed the Rwandan
Patriotic Front: a Tutsi–dominated rebel group, and had attacked Rwanda from their home base in Uganda. The invasion caused tension levels between
the two sides to skyrocket
On April 6th, 1994 President Juvenal Habyarimana's plane was shot down, killing everyone on board after flying back from delivering speeches in
neighboring countries. Despite the negotiations to keep peace, President Juvenal Habyarimana's death sparked a wide spread of violence....show more
content...
High political leaders who could challenge the Hutu were killed off almost immediately, and anyone suspected of being a Tutsi or having ties to a
Tutsi was killed. Tutsi were killed in their own homes and as they tried to escape the country. Whole Tutsi families were killed all at the same time.
Women were beaten and brutally raped. More than 67% of the women raped during the genocide were infected with HIV and

Essay On The Rwanda Genocide
DAYSTAR UNIVERSITY
School of Arts and Humanities
Department of Theology and Biblical Studies
ETH 202: Ethics of War and Peace
Assignment: Credo II
A discussion on the Rwandan Genocide and Kenyan Post Election Violence
Presented by: K. Ntinyari Mbogori 15–1658
Presented to: Reverend Steven Nduto
Date: 29|09|17
1.What was the main reason that triggered the Rwandan Genocide on April 7, 1994?
The country of Rwanda comprises an old kingdom that spanned several hundreds of years, established, ruled and ran by a people who spoke the
language Kinyarwanda. Within its years, these people split into two groups namely the Hutu and the Tutsi. It is unclear why, but it is speculated that it
may have been because of the different occupations they took; the Hutu being farmers and the Tutsi raising cattle. The Tutsi, despite...show more
content...
What possible benefits did the Kenyans got from the 2007/2008 PEV?
Post– election violence occurred following similar ethnic frustrations to the Rwandan Genocide. Once again, the perceived marginalization of one
community economically, politically and socially led to an uprising that devastated the country. Prior to this, Kenya had been considered the most
stable and the most successful democracies in East Africa following the landslide victory that overthrew Daniel Arap Moi.
Following the announcement of the election victor on December 27th 2008 and the subsequent clandestine swearing–in ceremony of the announced
winner Mwai Kibaki, violence erupted around the country with tribes of the western part of Kenya namely the Luo and Kalenjin rising up against the
Kikuyu and the latter's retaliation. The violence spread and lasted until February the next year after which followed the peace, power–sharing and
mediation talks conducted by Kofi Anan the former UN Secretary General. By this time, an estimated 1500 Kenyans had been killed and thousands

others displaced, doomed to live several years in Internally Displaces Person's

Genocide in Rwanda Essay
Genocide
War is not a necessary evil humans must endure. Although, war is not necessary, humans go to war to try to gain power, fortune, and to spread their
particular group's religions and beliefs. By definition civilization is an advanced state of intellectual, cultural, and material development in human
society, marked by progress in the arts and sciences, the extensive use of record–keeping, including writing, and the appearance of complex political
and social institutions. The chaos of war is reflected in the semantic history of the word war. War can be traced back to the Indo–European root
*wers–, "to confuse, mix up." In the Germanic family of the Indo–European languages, this root gave rise to several words having to do with...show
more content...
They also had begun organized slaughter, starting in the capital Kigali. They had killed nearly one million Rwandans in 100 days time.
The first people to be killed were those most likely to resist the plan of genocide. Those people included the Prime Minister, the Prisdent of the
constitutional court, priests, leaders of the Liberal Pary, etc. Also, those who did not immediately join the comapaign, like the governor of the south,
were removed from their political positions and some politicians were killed.
As the killing intensified, the international community deserted Rwanda. The US closed their eyes to the problems going on in Rwanda and Burundi
because it did not affect them. Western nations landed troops in Rwanda or Burundi in the first week to evacuate their citizens, did so, and left. The
UN mission (UNAMIR), created in October 1993 to keep the peace and assist the governmental transition in Rwanda, sought to intervene between the
killers and civilians. It also tried to mediate between the RPF and the Rwandan army after the RPF struck from Rwanda to protect Tutsi and rescue
their battalion encamped in Kigali as part of the Accord. On April 21, 1994, the United Nations Security Council, at the behest of the United
States–which had no troops in Rwanda–Belgium, and others, voted to withdraw all but a remnant of UNAMIR. The Security Council took

Essay on Genocide in Rwanda
Genocide in Rwanda
Raphael Lemkin coined the term "genocide" in 1944. According to Lemkin, genocide signifies the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group and
implies the existence of a coordinated plan, aimed at total extermination, to be put into effect against individuals chosen as victims purely, simply, and
exclusively because they are members of the target group. This coordinated plan is committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group. According to the United Nations' definition of genocide in their 1948 declaration of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, genocide is a crime under international law and classified as such:...show more content...
For instance, genocide has the tendency to occur in rural societies that are communal, divided, and in the mode of inequality and problematic issues.
It also has the tendency to occur when the government says that it is okay to resolve those problematic issues using violence. An example in which
there was a combination of racism, power struggles, and violence that all led to genocide is in the specific case of Rwanda between the Hutu and Tutsi
populations. Before colonial rule, the Tutsi were herdsmen and came from the Nile Valley. They brought concepts of power, monarchy, and kingship
to Rwanda. The Tutsi took grazing lands from the Hutu, who were farmers, and lived among them. Gourevitch states that this was the original
inequality: cattle were a more valuable asset than produce…and the word Tutsi became synonymous with a political and economic elite (p. 48).
The Tutsi, who were the powers of Rwanda, also became the protectors of the Hutu because they were armed with weapons and spears. Rwanda was
certainly an unequal society, but the ethnic boundary was permeable. Overtime, some Tutsi married Hutu. Also, Hutu farmers could, and did, become
wealthy Tutsi and acquired cattle as chiefs were incorporated into the ruling elite. Much authority was given to Hutu chiefs and certain obligations were
imposed on Tutsi administrators as well.
Colonial rule, however, transformed this

Write An Essay On The Rwanda Genocide

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Write An Essay On The Rwanda Genocide