(Rocky) Jaipur Call Girl - 09521753030 Escorts Service 50% Off with Cash ON D...
Using Heuristic Evaluation During Procurement to Improve Patient Safety
1. Using Heuristic Evaluation During
Procurement to Improve Patient
Safety
Amanda Raven, M.S.I.E.
Human Factors Safety Specialist, AHS
Amanda.Raven@albertahealthservices.ca
Jason Laberge, M.Sc.
Manager – Human Factors, AHS
Jason.Laberge@albertahealthservices.ca
2. 2
Define Opportunity
• Difficult to use medical devices are a patient safety
threat
– Have been implicated in adverse events and close calls within
and outside of Alberta Health Services (AHS)
• This threat can be minimized through careful evaluation
during procurement, prior to purchase and
implementation
• Heuristic evaluation is one evaluation technique that can
be used for medical devices during procurement
– Allows AHS to “Try It Before You Buy It”
3. 3
Build Understanding
• Heuristic evaluation was used by the
AHS Human Factors team to evaluate
electronic ‘wayfinding’ kiosks that were
being purchased for the new South
Health Campus in Calgary
Definition:
Wayfinding = all aspects of
knowing where you are and
successfully navigating to your
destination
4. 4
Act to Improve
• Heuristic Evaluation can be
used to evaluate the design of
a device to determine:
– How easy is the device to use?
– What errors are likely to be
observed with the device?
• Criteria (heuristics) can be
developed and assessed on a
device specific basis
Sample Wayfinding Design
Heuristics:
• Wayfinding principles –
includes overview maps,
landmarks, paths, and
intuitive signage
• Anthropometrics and
accessibility – Meets
ergonomic and accessibility
requirements
• Minimize memory load –
Does not require users to
memorize a lot of
information
• Prevent Errors –
Designed to prevent errors
from happening in the first
place
• Reversible actions –
Allows users to recover
from errors or change their
minds
5. 5
Measurement
• During the wayfinding kiosk evaluation, each vendor
device was evaluated by 3 Human Factors Specialists
• Compliance scores are issued for each heuristic for
each device, resulting in an overall compliance score
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Overall % Compliance
Heuristic Evaluation of Wayfinding Kiosk Vendors
4
3
2
1
0
Average Compliance Score
1 Vendor 1 2 Vendor 2 3 Vendor 3
• Lower compliance indicates
higher risk in terms of poor
design contributing to adverse
events
• AHS should purchase devices
with the highest compliance
scores
6. Normal Process With Heuristic Evaluation
6
Contribution to Patient Safety
Plan to Purchase
Create RFP
Select, purchase & deploy device
Identify common use errors
through close calls, adverse
events, patient harm
Implement reactive solutions (i.e.
training, policy) to reduce risk. With
serious issues, consider replacing
device ($$$).
Conduct Heuristic Evaluation to
identify usable and safe devices,
avoid devices with potential for major
use errors leading to adverse events
Select, purchase & deploy device
Use errors are identified prior to
purchase and deployment, proactively
reducing patient safety risk!
7. 7
Partnership
• Human Factors Specialists worked closely with the
Wayfinding working group at the South Health Campus
– Evaluation heuristics grounded in the defined wayfinding process
– Evaluations incorporated a
patient and volunteer
representative’s feedback
• Heuristic evaluations during
procurement support
engagement with users and
stakeholders for a medical
device
Image courtesy Joanne Ganton
8. 8
Sustain Results
• Heuristic evaluation in the procurement process leads
to sustainable change as it identifies usability concerns
with devices before they are brought into the health
system
– Avoids the negative impact that may have been observed if a
poorly designed device had been purchased
– Change is sustainable as usable devices remain in the health
system longer, rather than needing to constantly respond to
concerns with poorly designed devices.
Editor's Notes
Problem, issue and opportunity is clear, including a description of how it was identified and what the improvement goal was.
A key concern in any hospital environment is wayfinding – how do you know where you are and successfully navigate to your destination? This concern is especially relevant when undertaking the design of a new hospital, and was taken very seriously at SHC. The Alberta Health Services (AHS) Human Factors team was asked to assist the wayfinding working group in evaluating electronic kiosks to ensure they were easy to use and met the needs of hospital visitors.
Difficult to use devices have been implicated in adverse events and close calls both within and outside of AHS. Evaluating new devices prior to their purchase is a prospective patient safety activity which identifies design concerns prior to the device being purchased and put into use, allowing hazards to be avoided or mitigated before patient harm is observed.
Clearly defined aim, including the context in which the work was undertaken (unit/department/ community) and a summary of the conditions before the initiative.
This poster will demonstrate the value of using a Human Factors evaluation technique called Heuristic Evaluation to evaluate vendor proposals for the purchase of a new device. As an example, the poster will show how this technique was applied to evaluate electronic wayfinding kiosks that were being purchased for the new South Health Campus (SHC) in Calgary.
Description of activities undertaken to respond to the problem or issue, including a description of how changes were tested and implemented, and who was involved.
For the wayfinding kiosk, a heuristic evaluation was undertaken during the purchasing process. Three Human Factors Specialists developed specific heuristic (Rule of Thumb) criteria to evaluate each device. Attention was paid both to generally recognized usability criteria as well as wayfinding kiosk-specific criteria to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. The poster will provide examples of how heuristic evaluation can be developed and conducted for any medical device.
Description of the measurement strategy, including results (qualitative or quantitative)
Each heuristic criterion was given a compliance score rating by every Human Factors Specialist. Where differences were observed, a consensus rating was achieved through discussion. Ultimately, this technique of heuristic evaluation results in an overall compliance score for each product, which can then be used to inform the purchasing decision.
Clear articulation of how the submission relates to safe transitions in care or patient safety, with a focus on improving quality.
Difficult to use devices have been implicated in numerous adverse events and close calls in many health systems. Evaluating the ease of use of a device prior to purchase enables the identification of any major design concerns, and ultimately the purchase of easy to use devices. These devices are more likely to support clinicians, staff, patients, and their families within the health system, eliminating frustrations and potential ‘user error’ from the system.
Description of how a successful patient/client/resident/ family partnership was achieved.
This project involved partnership with the Wayfinding working group at SHC, including both patient and volunteer wayfinder representatives. These representatives took part in the evaluation sessions by interacting with each device and providing the Human Factors Specialists with feedback throughout the process. More generally, the heuristic evaluation process can encourage the engagement of all users of a device.
Statement of key lessons learned and how change is being sustained.
Human Factors involvement in the purchasing process leads to sustainable change as it identifies usability concerns with devices before they are brought into the health system, circumventing the negative impact that may have been observed if the device had been purchased. This change is sustainable as usable devices remain in the health system, rather than needing to constantly respond to concerns with poorly designed devices.