THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ON STUDENTS IN RWAMPALA COUNTY, MBARARA DISTRICT
1. January 18, 2017
THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL LEADERSHIP ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE ON STUDENTS IN RWAMPALA COUNTY, MBARARA DISTRICT
BY
OMONDI COLLINS OLOO
14/bsu/bsced/068
A RESEARCH PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF EDUCATION IN
PARTIAL FULFILLMENT IN THE REQUIREMENT OF BACHELORS OF SCIENCE
WITH EDUCATION AT BISHOP STUART
UNIVERSITY
JANUARY,2016
2. CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the background of the study, the statement of the problem, purpose of the
stud, objectives of the study, scope of the study, and significance of the study.
1.1 Background of the study.
Intensified pressure for academic achievement has motivated education researchers as well as
practitioners to focus on classroom and school factors affecting student performance (Lamb &
Fullarton, 2002). On its part, the Ugandan government prioritized science and mathematics
achievement declaring it a national goal (Kanja et al, 2001). In spite of the government’s
intensified efforts and initiatives to improve science and mathematics achievement, the
anticipated results have not been realized (Sifuna & Kaime, 2007).
This dissertation reports on a two-phased research study that consisted of a qualitative study in
the first phase whose results informed and led to the quantitative study in the second phase.
Drawing on the researcher’s experience in Ugandan education practice, a research proposal
formulated a problem of practice and proposed a conceptual model that was evaluated through a
mixed method study. The research proposal drew on school leadership theories to elucidate the
problem of practice and situate it in school leadership literature.
Leadership is constituted in the interactions of an organization’s actors – that is the leaders and
followers (Spillane, Halverson, & Diamond, 2004) and embedded in context (Uhl-Bien, Marion,
& McKelvey, 2007). Context here refers to the “nature of interactions and 4 interdependencies
among agents, hierarchical divisions, organizations, and environments” (Uhl-Bien et al,
2007:299). Leadership involves leveraging these interactions to attain organizational goals
(Spillane et al, 2004; Uhl-Bien et al, 2007).
The general consensus in school leadership studies is that successful schools have good leaders
(Spillane et al, 2004). However, as Spillane and colleagues (Spillane et al, 2004: 4) affirm “it has
been notoriously difficult to construct an account of school leadership, grounded in everyday
practice that goes beyond some generic heuristics for suggested practices”. Motivated by this
apparent difficulty in school leadership studies, we set out to explore, discover and examine the
nexus between school leadership and schools’ academic performance situated in Ugandan
secondary schools context.
The study was organized in a manner to illuminate and develop a deeper understanding of the
school leadership phenomena, and to construct and validate a mechanism through which school
leadership would impact students’ academic achievement. A qualitative study was designed to
3. uncover the relationship between school leadership and students achievement as it unfolded in its
natural setting within Ugandan secondary schools.
Academic performance is a major concern area in educational delivery in Uganda. Stakeholders
Like parents, teachers, students, policy makers and society as a whole are anxious to see
Learners excel in their academic work. Even without the necessary framework and resources,
Everyone still expects that the standard of performance should be high at all times, and for
Poor academic performance, the Head of the school is mostly held responsible.
Education is a vital strategy for the development of society [1]. This strategy requires careful
Planning at every stage of its development especially in the development of the human
Capital.
1.2 Statement of the problem
Academic excellence is fundamental to very student .it is from this background that that the
researcher proposes to assess and examine the impact of school leadership on students’ academic
performance on students in rwampala county ,mbarara district
1.3 Purpose of the study
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of school leadership on students’ academic
performance in schools in rwampala county, mbarara district. The purpose of this study was to
examine the impact of particular types of leadership on student outcomes. Two analyses of
different types of leadership provided essentially the same answer—the closer educational
leaders get to the core business of teaching and learning, the more likely they are to have a
positive impact on students’ outcomes.
1.4 Objectives of the study
The study will be conducted basing o the following objectives
To identify the different kinds of school leadership styles that prevail in schools in rwampala
county, mbarara district
To examine the impact of different leadership styles on students’ academic performance
4. To examine other factors that influence students’ academic performance of students in rwampala
county, mbarara district
To establish the measures that can be taken to improve on students’ academic performance in
schools in rwampala county, mbarara district.
1.5 Research questions
What are the different kinds of school leadership styles that prevail in schools in rwampala
county, mbarara district?
What are the impact of different leadership styles on students’ academic performance?
What are the other factors that influence students’ academic performance of students in
rwampala county, mbarara district?
What are the measures that can be taken to improve on students’ academic performance in
schools in rwampala county, mbarara district?
1.6 Scope of the study
This study comprises of the content scope, geographical scope and time scope
1.6.1 Content scope
The study will be confined to the impact of school leadership on students’ academic performance
in rwampala county mbarara district. The respondents will include the head teachers, teachers,
and student’s leaders of the selected secondary schools in rwampala county, mbarara district.
1.6.2 Geographical scope
The research is going to be carried out in the selected schools of rwampala comprehensive
school, kinoni high school, kinoni girl’s secondary school, laki high school bujaga, and rugando
collage secondary school.
1.6.3 Time scope
The collection of primary data will be limited to two months (February, March 2016) and
secondary data will be for a period of two months .this will be appropriate time for the researcher
to get the required information to carry out the study.
1.7 Significance of the study
1. The study will highlight the different types of leadership styles that prevail in secondary
schools in rwampala a county, mbarara district
5. 2. The study will help the government to identify the various impact of school leadership on
students academic performance
3. The researcher will pave way for other researchers interested in this field of study to learn
from it and expand upon their research
4. The study will also enable the researcher to attain his academic qualifications since its
necessary to the award of bachelors degree of science with education at bishop Stuart
university
5. There is a gap between the existing research and the descriptions of leadership relations
and their effect on students’ achievement. The study attempts to fill the gap by
understanding the leadership styles and their effects on students’ achievement by
identifying leadership styles and their relationships between the current practices and
academic performance. The Head teachers would examine their leadership styles and
their role as leaders.
6. There are numerous studies on leadership but few specially link students’ performance
and leadership style. It is, therefore, important to measure the relationship between
leadership styles of head teachers and the effect on students’ academic performance.
6. CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 introduction
This chapter concern is a review of major existing literature on the impact of school leadership
on students’ academic performance in selected schools in rwampala county, mbarara district .it
involves textbooks, newspapers, magazines and journals. This is developed into themes
developed from the study objectives guided by bathe research questions.
2.1 The different kinds of school leadership styles that prevail in schools in rwampala
county, mbarara district
Leadership theory, were listed and grouped to reflect common sets of leadership practices. Five
groupings or leadership dimensions emerged and their relationship with student outcomes
calculated.
As part of factors affecting students’ academic performance much attention has been attributed
to the leadership styles in our schools most especially the junior high school .Maxwell defines
leadership as nothing more than influence, and others believe that leadership is a process of
social influence where one person is able to motivate others to solve a common task .
Leadership can also be the way of leading a particular group to positively influence their growth,
and development towards achieving their set goal and for a collective purpose” The definition
implies that a leader should not be self-centered but make sure to please most of his constituents
if not all. Again the leader’s way of life should influence his followers in a positive way as to the
achievement of the collective goals of the group.
From the above, certain variable are needed in defining leadership. These variable are
“influence”, motivate, others’ (people) “accomplish task” and” make something extraordinary
happen”. Hence the review was designed to provide a review of leadership in general; leadership
theories and styles; leadership and management origins of leadership; educational leadership
styles in schools and conclusion.
Abraham Zaleznik asserted that “Leaders are visionaries, Leaders care about substance,
manager’s care about form and process. Leaders inspire: managers motivate”. In effect, in any
organization, including the school, there is the need for leaders to have powerful influence on the
quality of teaching and student performance.
Leith wood and Reihl as in [6] again observe that large scale quantitative studies of schooling
Concluded that the effects of leadership in student”. Adding that, [2] leadership effect on
academic work is often indirect, helping to promote “a vision and goals” by making available
materials and directions for teachers to engage students meaningfully.
7. This different forms of school leadership include the following.
Instructional Leadership
Instructional leadership theory has its empirical origins in studies undertaken during the late
1970’s and early 80’s of schools in poor urban communities where students succeeded despite
the odds (Edmonds, 1979). As reported by Busser, Dwyer, Rowan, and Lee (1982), these schools
typically had strong instructional leadership, including a learning climate free
Of disruption, a system of clear teaching objectives, and high teacher expectations
For students.
Early formulations of instructional leadership assumed it to be the responsibility of the principal.
Hence, measures of such leadership, such as the Principals’ Instructional Management Rating
Scale (PIMRS) (Hallinger &Murphy, 1985), focused only on the principal and neglected the
contribution of other staff to instructional goal setting, oversight of the teaching programs,
And the development of a positive academic and learning culture. The exclusive focus on the
principal reinforced a heroic view of the role that few were able to attain (Hallinger, 2005).
The most recent review of the impact of instructional leadership on student outcomes concluded
as follows: “The size of the effects that principals indirectly contribute toward student learning,
though statistically significant is also quite small” (Hallinger, 2005, p. 229). This conclusion
Was reached as part of a literature review and discussion of research on instructional leadership
rather than as a result of the calculation of the effect size statistic for each relevant study.
Emotional Leadership
Where transactional leadership was concerned primarily with the exchange of goods and
services, emotional leadership is concerned with the feelings and motivations of followers. It
takes the focus completely to the other side of the spectrum – demanding that leaders be
emotionally intelligent themselves and then to motivate through the use of that emotional
intelligence.
Emotional leadership and transformational leadership have a great deal in common with each
other. With emotional leadership, the leader taps into their emotional center in order to find the
8. path to guiding their followers. People sometimes argue that transformational leadership requires
that same level of influence over emotions, however there is a fundamental difference in the two
in that transformational leadership is by necessity a rational process rather than an emotional
one.
Transactional Leadership
Give and take is the hallmark of transactional leadership – it is indeed modeled just like a
business transaction. Of course the employer/employee relationship is largely transactional as is.
Employers need work done and employees do that work in exchange for money. That “quid pro
quo” (“something for something”) is the heart of the workplace, and everyone is generally happy
with this arrangement, but it only works if everyone involved sees it that way. In education, there
is often more at stake for employees who quite often understand their jobs to be more than just a
simple exchange of services for money, but rather see their higher purpose. Money is therefore
not the motivating factor.
This is where transformational leadership can step in to compliment transactional leadership,
taking the whole process as step further by building upon other forms of motivation outside of
simply the exchange of goods and services for money. However transformational leadership only
really works of the leader is able to keep up the charisma and interpersonal relationships which
are required for it to work.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership has its origins in James McGregor Burns’s1978 publication in
which he analyzed the ability of some leaders, across many types of organizations, to engage
with staff in ways that inspired them to new levels of energy, commitment, and moral purpose
(Burns, 1978). It was argued that this energy and commitment to a common vision transformed
The organization by developing its capacity to work collaboratively to overcome challenges and
reach ambitious goals.
Burns’s theory was extended further by Bass and colleagues who developed survey instruments
to assess transformational leadership (Bass &Avolio, 1994). Variations of these instruments have
been used in many published empirical studies of transformational leadership in education,
though few have investigated the impact of such leadership on students’ academic or social
outcomes. Of 33 studies reviewed by Leith wood and Jantzi (2005), about half were judged to
show that transformational leadership had a small indirect influence on academic or social
student outcomes.
2.2 The impact of different leadership styles on students’ academic performance
9. There is thus little consensus about how school leaders impact school’s academic outcomes and
little is known about how leadership is enacted within the schoolhouse and the means by which it
influences school outcomes (Hallinger & Heck, 1998; Spillane et al, 2004).These contrasting
positions leave the question about the degree of influence of school leadership on students’
academic performance unanswered.
Most contemporary studies that have sought to understand the relationship between school
leadership and academic performance have focused on the distributed/shared aspects of
leadership (for example Harris, 2004; Leith wood et al, 2007; Ahlstrom & Louis, 2008). This
focus is driven by a widespread belief about the 30
Superior benefits of distributed versus concentrated leadership. Moreover, it has been argued that
distributed forms of leadership reflect the reality of the day-to-day division of labor in schools
and minimize the probability of error in decision making by use of additional information
available from diverse, leadership sharing sources. (Leith wood & Miscall, 2008).
Hopkins and Jackson (2002:95) argue that “…distributed leadership along with social cohesion
and trust” are at the core of capacity building. Two forms distributed – additive and holistic –
have been identified by Leith wood et al (2007). The additive or cumulative pattern of
distribution has different individuals uncoordinatedly engaging in leadership activities while the
holistic pattern is a conscious alignment of leadership activities to foster collaboration between
leaders and followers (Gronn, 2000; Mascall et al, 2008).
This study aims to contribute to extant school leadership literature by seeking to understand the
influence of school leadership on schools’ academic performance and the applicability of
leadership theories to the Kenyan secondary schools’ context.
Academic achievement indirectly through a mediated process (Hallinger & Heck, 1996). Some
of the mediating variables of school leadership include teacher related factors such as beliefs and
emotional states (Mascall et al, 2008). It is therefore possible that school leaders, for example
principals, could exert indirect influence on a school’s mathematics performance through
teachers’ instructional practices and motivations. Specifically, distributed forms of leadership
have been positively associated with higher academic performance (Harris, 2004).
The list of dimensions is unusual in that it does not include the typical distinction between
leading through tasks and organization and leading through relationships and people. Leith wood
et al. (2004) for example, organize their literature review on “How Leadership Influences
Student Learning” under three headings: setting direction, developing people, and redesigning
the organization. The task–relationship distinction has been eschewed here because relationship
skills are embedded in every dimension. In goal setting, for example, effective leadership
involves not only determining the goal content (task focus) but doing so in a manner that enables
staff to understand and become committed to the goal (relationships).
With student background factors controlled, leadership made a difference to students through the
degree of emphasis on clear academic and learning goals (Bamberg & Andrews, 1991; Brewer,
1993; Heck teal., 1991).
10. In schools with higher achievement or higher achievement gains, academic goal focus is both a
property of leadership (e.g., “the principal makes student achievement the school’s top goal”)
and a quality of school organization (e.g., “schoolwide objectives are the focal point of reading
instruction in this school”).3 If goals are to function as influential coordinating mechanisms, they
need to be embedded in school and classroom routines And procedures (Robinson, 2001).
And recognizing academic achievement (Heck et al., 1991). There was also some evidence that
the degree of staff consensus about school goals was significant discriminator between otherwise
similar high- and low-performing schools (Golding & Pasternak, 1994).
Goal content is as important as the generic process of goal setting. The instructional leadership
studies were more likely than transformational leadership to include leadership indicators that
asked teachers to report the leaders’ emphases on particular goals, rather than the extent to which
the school leadership provided a generic direction.
A similar point has been made by Leith wood and Jantzi (2006) in their discussion of the results
of the role of transformational leadership in the English national literacy and numeracy reforms.
They found that the degree of transformational leadership explained the extent to which teachers
Changed, but the extent of teacher change bore no relationship to students ‘achievement gains in
either literacy or numeracy.
The present authors agree with the call of Leith wood and Jantzi (2006) for leadership
researchers to focus more strongly on what changes leaders encourage and promote, rather than
merely on the extent to which they promote unspecified changes Or innovation. Leith wood and
Jantzi (2006) write: There is a significant gulf between classroom practices that are “changed
“and practices that actually lead to greater pupil learning; the potency of leadership for
increasing student learning hinges on the specific classroom practices That leaders stimulate,
encourage and promote. (p. 223)In the context of goal setting, this means that what leaders and
leadership researchers need to focus on is not just leaders’ motivational and direction-setting
activities but on the educational content of those activities and Their alignment with intended
student outcomes. The importance of goal setting is also suggested from findings of a meta-
analysis of research on the direct effects of leadership on students’ academic achievements
reported by Witziers et al. (2003).
11. Leaders in higher performing schools are distinguished from their counterparts in otherwise
similar lower performing schools by their personal involvement in planning, coordinating, and
evaluating teaching and teachers. Four interrelated sub dimensions are involved in this leadership
dimension.
First, teachers in higher performing schools report that their leaders are actively involved in
collegial discussion of instructional matters, including how instruction impacts student
achievement (Heck et al., 1991).
Second, the leadership of higher performing schools is distinguished by its active oversight and
coordination of the instructional program. School leaders and staff work together to review and
improve teaching—an idea captured by that of shared instructional leadership (Heck et al., 1990;
Hecker al., 1991; Marks & Printy, 2003). In high-performing schools, the leadership was more
directly involved in coordinating the curriculum across year levels than in lower performing
schools. This included such activities as developing progressions of teaching objectives for
reading across year levels (Heck et al., 1991).
Third, the degree of leader involvement in classroom observation and subsequent feedback was
also associated with higher performing schools. Teachers in such schools reported that their
leaders set and adhered to clear performance standards for teaching (Andrews & Solder, 1987;
Bamberg &Andrews, 1991) and made regular classroom observations that helped them improve
their teaching (Bamberg & Andrews, 1991; Heck, 1992; Hecker al., 1990).
Fourth, there was greater emphasis in higher performing schools on ensuring that staff
systematically monitored student progress (Heck et al., 1990) and that test results were used for
the purpose of program improvement (Heck et al., 1991). For one study in Hawaiian primary
schools, use of achievement data involved both principal-led schoolwide examination of Data
and teacher-led classroom-based monitoring of students (Heck, 2000).
Teachers’ use of data to evaluate student progress, adjust their teaching, plan their weekly
program, and give students feedback was a strong indicator of school quality, and level of school
quality had a significant influence on student achievement in reading and math. It is important to
consider whether these findings are equally applicable to elementary and high schools. The
greater size, more differentiated structures, and specialist teaching culture of high schools would
suggest that the
Degree of principal influence, in particular, may be attenuated (Siskin &Little, 1995). The
present analysis provides some evidence relevant to this issue. Using a sample of 23 elementary
12. and 17 high schools, Heck (1992) found that the mean frequency of instructional leadership
activity in both higher and lower performing schools was lower in the high school group.
The mean effect size for the influence of the principal or designee was 1.1standard deviations in
elementary schools compared to 0.42 in high schools.
In sum, among higher performing schools, leaders work directly with teachers to plan,
coordinate, and evaluate teachers and teaching. They are more likely than their counterparts in
lower performing schools to provide evaluations that teachers describe as useful, and to ensure
that student progress is monitored and the results used to improve teaching programs.
Suggest that leaders who are perceived as sources of instructional advice and expertise gain
greater respect from their staff and hence have greater influence over how they teach. In
addition, the principals’ central position in school communication networks means that their
advice is more likely to have coordinating influence across the school (Friedkin & Slater, 1994).
Dimension 5: Ensuring an orderly and supportive environment.
These findings suggest that the leadership of effective schools is distinguished.
By emphasis on and success in establishing a safe and supportive environment through clear and
consistently enforced social expectations and discipline codes (Heck et al., 1991). In one study
that surveyed teachers, parents, and students (Heck, 2000), there were consistent reports
Across all three groups of the extent to which they felt safe, comfortable, and cared for.
An orderly and supportive environment is also one in which staff conflicts quickly and
effectively addressed. In one study, principal ability to identify and resolve conflict, rather than
allow it to fester, was strongly associated with student achievement in mathematics (Eberts &
Stone, 1986). A second variable, measuring differences between teacher and principal
perceptions of the latter’s ability to identify and resolve conflict, discriminated even
More strongly between higher and lower performing schools.
The belief that leadership matters when it comes to academic performance is generally accepted
within educational leadership studies (Hallinger & Heck, 1998; Spillane et al, 2004; Wahlstrom
& Louis, 2008), yet some scholars have questioned the validity of this claim (Witziers, Bosker,
& Krüger, 2003). Those that hold this divergent position have argued that there is no sufficient
13. proof that school leadership really matters. Some empirical studies, especially in the
Netherlands, have reported finding no significant influence of school leadership on students’
academic performance (Hallinger & Heck, 1998).
2.3 Other factors that influence students’ academic performance of students in selected
schools in rwampala county, mbarara district.
Internal and external factors affect the student academic performance. This entire host of reasons
are at work when society refuse to take responsibility and when children themselves behave
inappropriately or fail to meet a passing standard. In fact, there probably are as many factors as
there are struggling students. However, by grouping factors according to sources, you can begin
to identify where specific performance factors come from and how they intertwine with each
other. Children’s behavior and attitude towards school is influenced by our society today.
Student-Related Factors
There are some reasons for poor performance that are specific or related to the students and not
related to external factors. For example, bullying. The evolution of technology and social media
communication has, in some countries if not most, made it easier than ever for young people to
be exposed to environments that can make bullying unbearable and even more threatening than
ever before. Self-motivation, learning disability is student-centered and may create an obstacle to
reaching certain academic standards. Motivation also can play a factor in poor performance. A
student may be fully capable of earning high grades but might simply not care enough about
education to exert the effort. Issues of motivation could be placed upon the parents or even the
school, but sometimes a child simply does not enjoy learning.
Teacher-Related Factors
Africa loses an estimated 20,000 skilled personnel a year to developed countries in search of
better employment opportunities including qualified teachers. South Africa as an example; the
country needs 15000 more Teachers a year while Uganda’s ratio of student to qualified teacher is
42:1 for primary school while secondary is 31:1 .Teachers play a significant role in student
performance and also can be responsible for poor student performance. For example, if a teacher
lacks experience or is dispassionate about teaching, the children might not be able to develop
comprehensive understandings of the subject material. Furthermore, if the teacher suffers from a
classroom management problem, such as extreme authoritarianism, the classroom environment
might hinder fruitful class discussions and collaborative learning. It also can deter students from
applying themselves to the best of their abilities. Food for thought, something has got to be done!
School-Related Factors
The number of children enrolled in primary schools more than doubled between 1990 and 2012,
from 62 million to 149 million children in Sub-Saharan Africa. This is a huge increase in
enrollment compared to what the schools are able to accommodate, let alone increase the number
14. of qualified teachers. Schools themselves can then be contributors to low student performance
when one analyses these numbers. In such an environment, students then have to put forth less
effort because the expectations placed upon them have been lowered in order to cope with
increased demand for education. Furthermore, governments’ lack of ability to provide more
school funding increases the disparity.
In schools that can’t afford more teachers or building expansions, classes sometimes become
overcrowded to the point that children learn under trees and teachers have to spend more time on
‘classroom’ management than on teaching, which can result in lower student performance. Rural
and township schools are the most affected and in these areas you also find the highest levels of
poverty, given that 32 of the world’s 38 heavily indebted poor countries are in Africa. Food for
thought, something has got to be done!
Family-Related Factors
Finally, family-related factors can play a critical role in a student’s academic performance.
Average life expectancy in Africa is only 46 years due to HIV/AIDS. For instance, when both
parents are deceased as a result of HIV/AIDS, older children take the responsibility to raise and
provide for their siblings. Such heavy responsibility on a minor has a huge impact on academic
performance. In most cases the older children are forced into early marriages and or prostitution
in order to escape this responsibility. ‘Child marriages’ is one family related major contributor to
factors that affect academic performance of children.
In urban areas most working parents are too busy to care about their children’s performance,
causing children to lose their academic focus. Furthermore, living in poverty also can distract a
child from academics because survival becomes a more immediate and pressing priority. Both of
these examples include situations in which the parents are not intentionally harming a child’s
education, but such cases still can impact the problem. In extreme examples, if a parent or other
family member is abusive, that situation easily can consume a student’s attention and cause his
or her academic performance to decline dramatically.
Yvonne Beaumont Walters, kola soyibo,(1998) further elaborated that student performance is
very much dependent on SEB (socio economic back ground)as per their statement, “High school
students’ level of performance is with statistically significant differences, linked to their gender,
grade level, school location, school type, student type and socio-economic background (SEB).”
2.4 The measures that can be taken to improve on students’ academic performance in
schools in rwampala county, mbarara district.
Parental Involvement Strategy
On the influence of parental involvement strategy on students’ academic performance in public
secondary schools in ASAL areas in Kenya, schools as organizations involve parents in fee
payments and in the supervision of student’s academic progress. Most parents attend parent
meetings and there is a parent’s teachers association which every parent of a given school is a
member. The work of teachers is to ensure that the students perform well academically. Parents
15. mostly play a subsidiary role of providing financial support. Spera (2006) pointed out that
parental involvement in education tends to decrease across middle and secondary school, due in
part to adolescents’ increasing desire for autonomy and in part to changes in school structure and
organization. Provision of Support Programs Strategy
In respect to the influence of student support programs strategy on students’ academic
performance in public secondary schools in ASAL areas in Kenya, schools have assigned a
mentor to lead and guide students, counseling programs are available to students, remedial
coaching is provided to slow learners and students are properly tutored. Extra coaching for
instance helps the weaker students to be at bar with other students thus enabling the school get
good grades. Mentoring of students by teachers and adults is crucial for their success.
Capacity Building Strategy
In regard to the influence of capacity building strategy on students’ academic performance in
ASAL areas in Kenya, the teachers are continuously inducted in workshops and trainings for
capacity building, teachers are involved in decision making to improve on their leadership skills,
teachers are regularly taken through leadership courses and programs and teachers are often
enrolled in fully sponsored in-service training programs by the employer. Good academic
performance is realized due to, qualified teachers and adequate learning materials availability. As
such, most teachers in public schools in ASAL areas in Kenya are already better trained to
effectively impart relevant knowledge to their students.
Behavior Modification Strategy
On how behavior modification strategy impacts students’ academic performance in ASAL areas
in Kenya, students are sensitized on the importance of having good role models, punishment is
administered to offenders according to their International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol.
3, No. 4; 2015
Level of misdemeanor, exemplary behavior is usually acknowledged with positive
reinforcements and students are trained on how to monitor and evaluate their behavior and set
goals. Good behavior guarantees good grades. This is because students do not waste their study
time on other unnecessary things. Desirable behavior is reinforced in schools by rewarding the
most disciplined students.
Provision of Life Skills Strategy
On how Life Skill strategy affects students’ academic performance in ASAL areas in Kenya,
students in the school are good at solving problems, most students are able to think creatively,
students are able to communicate effectively and students are able to cope in stressful situations.
Imparting students with Life Skills knowledge enables them to be assertive. The students become
judgmental thus will not involve themselves in disruptive activities. Rooth (2000) points out that
Life Skills are needed for successful living in the twenty first century. Life skills include
disciplined work habits, caring attitudes, and the ability to cope as well as to create one’s own
opportunities..
16. Academic Indicators Strategy
On academic performance indicators strategy in ASAL areas in Kenya, good grades in national
examinations, syllabus completion on time, improved student discipline and excellent
performance in inter-school academic contests shows that the school is performing well
academically. A good grade in the national examination is an indicator to good performance.
However, the ability to complete the syllabus on time could be a major booster in posting even
more impressive grades in the national examinations. World Bank (2002) notes that student
achievement is evaluated by the mark or grade that student attain in tests or examinations done at
the end of the topic, term or year or education cycle.
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
• introduction
This presents the methods employed in data collection and analysis .it describes the research
design, study populations, sample size, sample design, sample procedure, data collection tools,
data processing and analysis.
3.1 research design
This study will adopt descriptive research design where both qualitative and quantitative data
will be employed to gain an in-depth understanding of the impact of school leadership on
students’ academic performance in schools in rwampala county, mbarara district.
17. Qualitative data will help in drawing conclusions and recommendations .it will further enable the
assessment of impact of school leadership on students a academic performance in schools in
rwampala county mbarara district. While quantitative research design will be used to evaluate
facts collected from the field.
3.2 Sample population and sampling size
The survey populations will comprise of 100 respondents of whom both are the headmasters
,director of studies, students leaders and teachers found inn selected schools in rwampala
county ,mbarara district and theses schools include; rwampala comprehensive school,kinoni high
school,laki high school bujaga,kinoni girls secondary school,rugando college secondary school.
The sample size will be got from the study [population, of the people in the selected schools in
rwampala county mbarara district.
Category Number of Respondents
Headteachers 05
Director of studies 05
teachers 20
Student leaders 20
students 50
Total 100
3.3 Sampling techniques
The researcher will use a stratified random sampling technique during the field study .stratified
random sampling is a process of sample selection which involves dividing the population into
non overlapping groups called strata’s or selecting the sample from each stratum using simple
random techniques .the choice is made in order to enable the researcher get adequate
representation of the whole population .With stratified random sampling, the sample will be kept
small without losing its accuracy .
3.4 Source of the data
Data used will be both primary and secondary .primary data will be collected by the use of
questionnaires and secondary data will be collected by the use of internet and reports, including
journals.
3.4.1 Primary source
Data will be collected by the uses of questionnaires .theses will be designed by the researcher
and they will be distributed to the prospective selected schools in rwampala county, mbarara
18. district. That is rwampala comprehensive school, kinoni high school, kinoni girl’s secondary
school, laki high school bujaga, rugando college secondary school.
3.4.2 Secondary source of data
The source will comprise the review of textbooks, journals, newspapers articles, internet and
earlier researcher on the problem.
3.5 Data collection tools.
Data will be collected from primary respondents using a focus/guided interview and self
administered questionnaires. A self administered, questionnaire and direct interviews will be
used to collect information from the respondents of this study. Secondary data will be collected
using journals, newspapers and library sources.
3.5.1 Interviews
This will involve conversations between the interviewer and the respondent. In this case the
researcher will use guided/focused whereby the study objectives will guide the interviewer and
the respondent will be given a considerable degree of latitude within the frame work .It is
preferred because the respondent will be given a freedom to talk about the topic and given their
views in their own time . The interview guide is used since it also gets the views of people who
do not know how to read and write and also gives first hand information from the respondents.
3.5.2 Questionnaire
A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions and other prompts for
the purpose of gathering information from respondents. Burns, A. C. (2010). The researcher will
set open and closed ended questions to the respondents during the time of the field study. These
will be set in relation to the study objectives where the respondents will answer in writings. A
questionnaire is preferred since it increases the response rate in a short period of time.
3.6 Data quality control
To ensure validity of the mentioned instrument, the researcher will ensure that questions or items
in it conform to the study’s objectives.
To ensure reliability, the researcher will test reliability of the instrument using retest methods
whereby the questionnaires will be distributed to different groups of people at different point of
time to test whether the same information is provided.
3.7 Data analysis
Data from the research field will be analyzed by both qualitative and quantitative
methods.quantitavely, data will be used to generate tallies, frequencies and there after computer
19. programs like spss will be used to sort the findings and present them in tabular and graphical
form in units of percentages.Qualitatively, thematic analysis will be applied .by this method data
will be coded and arranged in themes and sub-themes leaving a room for exploration
REFERENCES
Alig-Mielcarek, J. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Instructional leadership: Its nature, meaning,
And influence. In C. G. Mikel & W. K. Hoy (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform
(pp. 29-52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Andrews, R., & Solder, R. (1987). Principal leadership and student achievement. Educational
Leadership, 44(6), 9-11.
Bamberg, J. D., & Andrews, R. L. (1991). School goals, principals, and achievement. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 175-191.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through
transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bell, L., Bolam, R., & Cubillo, L. (2003). A systematic review of the impact of school head
teachers and principals on student outcomes. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science
Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Bollman, L., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: Josei Bass.
Busser, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management
Role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
Brewer, D. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools.
20. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281-292.
Brown, D. J., & Keeping, L. M. (2005). Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership:
The role of affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 245-272.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Principal’s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: