1. Date: 02.05.2016
To,
The Bihar State Bar Council
SUB: COMPLAINT AGAINST ADVOCATE GOPAL KUMAR
(836/1991), DISTRICT COURT BEGUSARAI AND
ADVOCATE DHIRENDRA PRASAD (963/1990), DISTRICT
COURT, KATIHAR BIHAR-reg.
Hon’ble Sir,
1.Hon’ble sir, the undersigned is petitioner,
named Om Prakash S/O Late Sh Deep Narayan
Poddar R/O Asha Deep Niwas, Shukkar Hat, Durga
Mandir, Sonaili, Kadwa, Katihar, Bihar-855114
and rented R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg,
Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, New Delhi-
110077
2.Hon’ble sir, Advocate, Gopal Kumar, district
court, Begusarai managed to get issued a
frivolous N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 against me and
my ailing old age mother through SP Begusarai
while I was struggling to save the life of my
mother in ICU of AIIMS, New Delhi. His wife

2. Protection officer (Under protection of women
against domestic violence Act 2005) has misused
and abused her vested power by way of
instituting frivolous litigation vide case No.
9P/2010 dated 31.03.2010 before CJM Court
Begusarai, Bihar after a gap of 5 years for her
own vested interest. Replication and
cancellation of N.B.W have been filed by me on
03.03.2011 against this frivolous case at
Begusarai Court in Bihar. It is also on the
Supreme Court Record with SLP(C) no. 9854/2012,
SLP(C) no. 9483/2013 and SLP(C) no. 19073/2013.
3.Hon’ble sir, the client of Advocate Gopal Kumar
has appeared before the Trial Court at New
Delhi but did not file written statement (WS)
before Trial Court at New Delhi and did not
join High Court of Delhi even after receipt of
service Notice which is also on the Supreme
Court Record.
4.Hon’ble sir, after the pronouncement of Ex-
parte Judgment by the High Court of Delhi in
favour of me in MAT. APPL. 7/2012 on
23.07.2013; second time Advocate Gopal Kumar
has instituted another frivolous criminal case
vide case no. 5591/2013 u/s 498A/323 of IPC and

3. u/s 3/4 of D.P. Act with filing date 07.02.2011
and first hearing date 05.12.2013 without the
knowledge of me. It is pertinent to note here
that the client of Advocate Gopal Kumar has
appeared before the Trial Court at New Delhi on
09.02.2011 in case No. HMA-700/2010 before
Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka Court at
New Delhi and intentionally did not mention
criminal case no. 5591/2013 filing date
7.2.2011 u/s 498A/323 of IPC and u/s 3/4 of D.P
Act to the Trial Court.
5.Hon’ble sir, the marriage was fraudulent with
misrepresentation of bride in 2004. I have
never ever been to the residence of rich IOCL
client of Advocate Gopal Kumar in my whole
life. I even do not know the multiple
residential addresses of rich IOCL client of
Advocate Gopal Kumar since 12 years. For the
first time I came to know the official address
of rich IOCL client of Advocate Gopal Kumar on
09.02.2011 when she supplied the proceedings of
Begusarai Court against case no. 9P/2010 before
the Trial Court at New Delhi.

4. 6.Hon’ble sir, No FIR, No WS by the client of
Advocate Gopal Kumar before the Trial Court at
New Delhi, No appearance by the client of
Advocate Gopal Kumar before the High Court of
Delhi, yet frivolous criminal cases are
continuing for the same cause of action after
the settlement by the High Court of Delhi on
23.07.2013 in MAT. APPL. 7/2012.
7.Hon’ble sir, after winning the case MAT. APPL.
7/2012 in 2013, I have visited thrice to my
parental house in Bihar and have not received
any Notice or Summon against u/s 498A/323 of
IPC and u/s 3/4 of D.P. Act as on date.
8.Hon’ble sir, it is a backstabbing plans to
create and repeat another Kanahiya case (of
17th
February, 2016 inside the Patiala House
Court premises at New Delhi) in the premises of
Begusarai Court against me and my mother.
9.Hon’ble sir, it also violates the directions of
Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been laid down
in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar
in Cr APP No. 1277 of 2014.

5. 10. Hon’ble sir, three untimely deaths have
been occurred in my family since 12 years. My
family has been reduced to one member family
i.e. ailing old age mother only now and the
criminal conspiracy through misusing Government
machineries are increasing day by day against
me and my mother.
11. Hon’ble sir, if these misused Government
machineries who are indulged in criminal
conspiracies since 12 years against me and my
mother are not being stopped and not being
punished then I and my mother will also
disappear untimely like an untimely demise of
my father in 2007 and my property will be
usurped by the client of the Advocate Gopal
Kumar and no one will be left in my family to
report.
12. Hon’ble sir, it has been observed over the
period of 12 years that these misused
Government machineries are from the same
community i.e. Kayasth community of Bihar viz.
S.B. Sinha, Retd. Chief Justice of Delhi High
Court; Praveen Kumar, C&MD, IDPL; Veena Kumari,

6. Protection officer Begusarai; her husband,
Gopal Kumar, Advocate district court,
Begusarai; Yugal Kishore Sinha, DSP, Katihar;
Nawal Kishore Sinha, Accountant, SBI, ADB
Sonaili Bazar, Katihar; Dhirendra Prasad,
Advocate, district court, Katihar and Hari
Prasad, Assistant Commissioner, Food supplies &
consumer affairs, Dwarka, New Delhi.
13. Hon’ble sir, these misused Government
machineries have turned my parental house into
public toilet with the help of SP Katihar and
local Mukhiya, Mr. Bihari Lal Bubna in the
midst of religious gathering called Bhagwat
w.e.f 28.02.2016 to 05.03.2016. Fax complaint
and electronic complaints have been forwarded
to all concern government agencies against the
same on 03.03.2016. Complaint also has been
forwarded to Chief Minister Secretariat (CMSEC)
through Bihar Public Grievance Redressal System
vide complaint number 99999-0303160113 and
99999- 1703160139 dated 03.03.2016 and
29.03.2016. No action has been taken so far.
14. Hon’ble sir, Advocate Dhirendra Prasad,
District Court, Katihar, has given a threat to

7. the life of the petitioner and his pensioned
mother to render apology or to face criminal
case u/s 500 of IPC against the Notice u/s 80
CPC to SBI accountant and Bank manager sonaili,
Katihar. Notice u/s 80 CPC to SBI Sonaili
Katihar has been sent for attacking the pension
account of customer, harassing the customer
unnecessarily, not removing KYC alert, refusing
to open ATM machine for withdrawal, planning to
hack the ATM pin of customer, tracking the
customer till Delhi with ulterior motive and
establishing nexus with Dwarka SBI Branch to
hack the ATM pin of customer. Revenue of
property of the petitioner’s mother has been
attacked by the Branch Manager SBI Sonaili in
the garb of Green Remit Card (GRC), while GRC
is not mandatory and it is not applicable for
home branch. Home Branch Manager, SBI Sonaili
did not let the attendant of petitioner’s
mother to deposit her own cash from property
into her own saving account.
15. Hon’ble sir, these misused Government
machineries are not letting me to live in Bihar
as well as in Delhi infringing my right to life
or personal liberty under Article 21.

8. 16. Hon’ble sir, my Writ (C) 90 of 2016 has
been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India as the Hon’ble court did not find any
ground under Article 32 of Constitution of
India to entertain this petition.
17. Hon’ble Sir, Whether I have right to live
or not?
18. Hon’ble sir, on the basis of above facts
and circumstances, it is accordingly prayed
that an appropriate action to be initiated
against Advocate Gopal Kumar District court
Begusarai and Advocate Dhirendra Prasad,
District Court, Katihar Bihar against the
pursuance of frivolous criminal litigation
against the petitioner and his ailing old age
mother which has been settled by the High Court
of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT. APPL. 7/2012, in
the furtherance of Justice.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 02.05.2016