Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit and Annexures P-1 to P-5 filed before Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 45930 dated 05.06.2017

1. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
CRL.M.P. D.NO.16166 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO.3913 OF 2017
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
S.N
Particulars Copies Pages
1. Application for Urgent Hearing
of Appeal by way of motion
against the Lodgment Order
dated 16.02.2017 in
W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017
issued by the Registrar,
Supreme Court of India under
Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 along with
Affidavit
1+3 1-34
2. Annexures P-1 to P-5 1+3 35-84

2. Petitioner in Person
On behalf of Petitioner No.02
(Om Prakash)
RZF-893, NETAJI SUBUSH
MARG, RAJ NAGAR PART-2
PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI-
110077, DWARKA SEC-08
MOB: 9968337815
E-mail:
om.poddar@gmail.com
(Widow Asha Rani Devi)
Petitioner No.02
R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS
W/O LATE SHRI DEEP NARAYAN
PODDAR
SHUKKAR HATT, NEAR DURGA MANDIR
P.S. KADWA, P.O. SONAILI
DISTT. KATIHAR, BIHAR-855114
Filed on : 05.06.2017
Diary No : 45930

3. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
CRL.M.P. D.NO.16166 OF 2017
WITH
CRL.M.P. D.NO.17593 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO.3913 OF 2017
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
APPLICATION FOR URGENT HEARING OF APPEAL
BY WAY OF MOTION AGAINST THE LODGMENT

4. ORDER DATED 16.02.2017 IN
W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 ISSUED BY
THE REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UNDER ORDER XV RULE 5 OF THE SUPREME
COURT RULES, 2013.
To
Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India
and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of
India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner abovenamed.
MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the present petition under
Article 32 of the Constitution of India is being
filed to enforce the Rights under Article 21 of
the Constitution of India with Writ Petition
Criminal vide D.NO. 3913 of 2017, Writ Petition
Criminal vide D.NO. 2188 of 2017, Writ Petition

5. Criminal 136 of 2016 and Writ Petition Civil 90
of 2016; whereby Registrar (J-I) of this Hon’ble
court has refused to register Writ Petition
(Criminal) D.No. 3913 of 2017 under Article 32
of Constitution of India titled as “Om Prakash &
Anr Vs. Registrar, Supreme Court of India & Anr”
on the ground of no reasonable cause received
for registration under order XV, Rule 5 of the
Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has suspended
the fundamental rights of the petitioners under
Article 21 and closed the door of this
Hon’ble Court for the petitioners forever,
the contents of which are requested to be read
as part of this application, as the same are not
being repeated here for the sake of brevity.
2. That the matter pertains to imminent
danger to life or personal liberty of the
petitioners; perjury and planned murder designed
by the nexus of Rtd. Justice Mr. S.B. Sinha of
this Hon’ble Court and Mr. Praveen Kumar from
Indian Defense Account Service (IDAS).

6. 3. That all the petitions filed by the
petitioner before this Hon’ble Court has been
either dismissed or lodged or withdrawn because
of suppression of records and denial of access
to justice by this Hon’ble Court; which has
resulted in planned murder/encounter of the
petitioners.
4. That now, the petitioner has been
left with only Appeal by way of motion against
the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in
W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the
Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV
Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 as a
last resort to access to the Court of Hon’ble
the Chief Justice of India.
5. That the Registry has notified
defects vide D.NO. 840/2017/X dated 22.03.2017
and D.NO. 840/2017/X dated 16.05.2017 in the
Appeal by way of motion Crl. M.P. D.NO. 16166 of

7. 2017 & Crl. M.P. D.NO. 17593 of 2017 against
Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P. (Crl.)
D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar,
Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of
the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.
6. That the petitioner has cured the
notified defects of the Registrar and refiled
the same vide D.NO.26314 dated 28.03.2017 and
vide D.NO.42137 dated 19.05.2017 before this
Hon’ble Court.
7. That the Appeal by way of motion
vide Crl. M.P. D.NO. 16166 of 2017 with Crl.
M.P. D.NO. 17593 of 2017 against the Lodgment
Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of
2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of
India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court
Rules, 2013 is pending since 20.02.2017 and this
diary number is neither being converted into
registered case nor being listed before the

8. Hon’ble Court so far.
8. That instead, the Registrar has
forcibly registered the defective Curative
(Crl.)D 41026 of 2016 without the consent of
petitioners on 28.02.2017 and twice listed the
same before the Hon’ble Judge in Chamber dated
27.03.2017 and 01.05.2017 for direction even
after letter dated 17.12.2016; 22.12.2016;
31.12.2016; 06.01.2017; 25.01.2017; 02.03.2017;
23.03.2017 and 05.04.2017 by the petitioners.
9. That the petitioner has withdrawn a
defective Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016
vide D.NO. 19917 dated 03.03.2017. Moreover, the
petitioner has NOT filed an interlocutory
application for appearance in person against
Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016. Certified
copy of Order dated 27.03.2017 and 01.05.2017 of
this Hon’ble Court in Curative (Criminal) D
41026 of 2016; Certified copy of withdrawal

9. application M.P.(Crl.) D.NO.19917 of 2017 in
Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 and
Certified copy of para 15 of the Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 are annexed herein as
Annexure P-1 (Page from 35 to 59)
10. That the Registrar has not complied
the Order dated 01.05.2017 of this Hon’ble
Court. The Order dated 01.05.2017 in Curative
(Criminal)D 41026 of 2016 clearly says, remove
office objections “from today”. Therefore it
implies w.e.f. 01.05.2017 itself. However, the
registry has not intimated the petitioner about
the Hon’ble Court’s direction on 01.05.2017.
Petitioner came to know about the Hon’ble
Court’s direction when the order was uploaded at
the website of Supreme Court of India dated
03.05.2017. Moreover, even after several
reminders over telephone and email dated
03.05.2017 and 04.05.2017 to the Branch Officer
Section X, petitioner was not allowed to remove
office objections on 03.05.2017 and 04.05.2017.

10. Petitioner has forcibly refiled the withdrawal
Application Crl. M.P. D.NO. 19917 of 2017 in
Curative (Criminal)D 41026 of 2016 on 05.05.2017
complying the order dated 01.05.2017 of this
Hon’ble Court and removing the office objection
from the withdrawal application. That the
Registry has neither complied the order dated
01.05.2017 of this Hon’ble Court nor paid any
heed to the urgency of the petitioner and kept
the Curative (Criminal)D 41026 of 2016
registered and pending before this Hon’ble Court
as on date.
11. That the petitioners have prayed
their urgency to list the Appeal by way of
motion against the Lodgment Order dated
16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017
through email letter dated 04.05.2017 and letter
vide D.NO.45513 dated 01.06.2017. However, the
Registrar has not paid any heed to the urgency
of the petitioner so far.

11. 12. That there has been rampant
suppression of records, violation of set
practice, procedure and rules of this Hon’ble
Court; evasion of Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court
Rules 2013 and denial of access to justice to
the petitioners by this Hon’ble Court since 2016
to till date.
13. That the petitioners are suffering
from illness and undergoing treatment with AIIMS
at New Delhi under illegal confinement in rented
accommodation without any employment at New
Delhi since 14 years.
14. That one death certificate is
already on the record of SCR and another death
certificate of petitioner no.02 is likely to be
on the SCR. Thereafter no one will be left in
her family and her life time acquired property
will be usurped by the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha
and his associates.

12. 15. That the petitioner has apprised the
alleged involvement of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha
into this matter to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India through nine cases for the interlinked
subject matters with different cause of actions
for the same relief till 03.02.2017. Fourteen
year old matter, two states jurisdiction and
illegal confinement. (SLP(C) no. 9854/2012,
SLP(C) no. 9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013,
Writ (C) 90 of 2016, Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016,
R.P. (Crl.) 825 of 2016, Curative (Crl.) D 41026
of 2016, Writ (Crl.) D.NO.2188 of 2017 and Writ
(Crl.) D.NO. 3913 of 2017).
16. That the Police Complaint u/s 200
Cr.Pc. and u/s 154(3)Cr.Pc. vide diary no. 37B
dated 30.05.2016, computerized complaint no.
00081710571601332 before P.S. Palam Village,
South West District at New Delhi has also been
filed by the petitioners for registration of
F.I.R against Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha, Mr.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rtd. Baruni Refinery

13. employee and Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS)& CMD of
IDPL at New Delhi. However, police has not
registered F.I.R against the accused so far.
17. That the petitioner has filed
W.P.(C) 90 of 2016 before this Hon’ble Court
against Mr. Praveen Kumar(IDAS) for illegal
termination of service without payment of wages
which has been dismissed on 18.04.2016 by this
Hon’ble Court. However, the same has been
registered as letter petition and pending under
Supreme Court Grievance Management System vide
D.NO.2206 since 16.01.2016. Mr. Praveen Kumar
(IDAS) & CMD of IDPL, Scope Complex, Lodhi Road
New Delhi has not let the petitioner no.01 to
work and kept him without work for one month at
Head Office and dismissed him with mala fide
intention and kept him under house arrest
without any work since 2014 to till date. It is
pertinent to mention here that the petitioners
are residing in rented accommodation at New
Delhi without any employment. Mr. Praveen Kumar

14. (IDAS) & his associates have hit all the BASIC
NEEDS of petitioners in Bihar as well as in
Delhi so that the petitioner no.01 & 02 could
not survive in this world, which has been
apprised and filed as written mentioning of
arguments vide D.NO.28889 dated 08.04.2016 in
W.P.(C) 90 of 2016.
18. That an offence of perjury has been
committed by Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) & CMD of
IDPL through Written Statement (WS) dated
07.09.2015 filed before Patiala House Court at
New Delhi which has been annexed as Annexure P-
42 (page from 223 to 248) in VOL-I in W.P.(C) 90
of 2016. Perjury has been exposed by the
petitioner through replication dated 04.11.2015
which has been annexed as Annexure P-53 (page
from 343 to 386) in VOL-II in W.P.(C) 90 of
2016.
19. That the petitioner has placed the
names of thirty six bad elements of Center and

15. State Government’s apparatus alleged associates
of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha of this Hon’ble Court
on the record of SCR with material evidence in
Writ (C) 90 of 2016; Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016;
Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017 and Writ (Crl.)
D.NO. 3913 of 2017 filed so far before this
Hon’ble Court. List of Bad Elements are annexed
herein as Annexure P-2 (Page from 60 to 65)
20. That the petitioner has also
apprised Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India
through letters via R&I department of Supreme
Court of India vide diary no.15411 dated
01.04.2017; vide diary no. 16879 dated
10.04.2017 and vide diary no. 18543 dated
17.04.2017.
21. That the Grievance Management System
of Supreme Court of India has registered total
eleven grievances of petitioners as letter
petition so far vide D.NO. 2206 dated
09.01.2016; vide D.NO.35529 dated 19.08.2016;

16. vide D.NO. 43126 dated 08.10.2016; vide D.NO.
47003 dated 13.10.2016; vide D.NO. 47004 dated
13.10.2016; vide D.NO. 50548 dated 21.10.2016;
vide D.NO. 3179 dated 12.01.2017; vide D.NO. 3185
dated 17.01.2017; vide D.NO. 20578 dated
25.02.2017; vide D.NO. 17135 dated 08.04.2017;
vide D.NO. 17748 dated 17.04.2017 which are
either pending or disposed of without any relief
in the garb of lame excuses like “letter
petition does not cover under PIL guidelines or
digitally not signed or tempering the name of
applicant from Om Prakash to ABCD against D.NO.
20578”. Update of D.NO. 20578 of 2017 on
16.05.2017 and 20.05.2017 are annexed herein as
Annexure P-3 (Page from 66 to 67)
22. That the Central Information
Commission (CIC) at New Delhi has registered and
admitted six second appeals and one complaint
u/s 18 of RTI Act 2005 vide F.NO.
CIC/SS/A/2013/901846-SA; vide F.NO.
CIC/DLJLA/A/2017/183721 dated 20.01.2017; vide

17. F.NO. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 dated 06.03.2017;
vide F.NO. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/122864 dated
26.04.2017; vide F.NO. CIC/CICOM/A/2017/119689
dated 27.04.2017; vide F.NO.
CIC/CICOM/A/2017/126308 dated 01.05.2017 and
complaint vide F.NO.CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945
dated 28.11.2016 against different cause actions
for the interlinked same subject matters and for
the same relief. The cause of actions for Second
Appeal arose against Withdrawal of Legal Aid
Services by Delhi High Court Legal Service
Committee (DHCLSC) without prior intimation;
refusal to reply or supply of false and
misleading information by Dept of Legal Affairs,
Government of India and Law Department Bihar;
refusal to reply against suppression of records
in the office report in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of 2016;
violation of set practice, procedure and rules
by the Registrar Misc. of Supreme Court of India
in the garb of Judicial Order or interpretation
of Law; refusal to reply and transfer physically
the online RTI request by Department of Legal

18. Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice Government of
India pertaining to two States jurisdictions to
the concerned PIO u/s 6(3)(i)(ii) of RTI Act to
which the subject matter closely connected with;
refusal to reply against refusal of registration
of Writ petition Criminal D.NO. 2188 of 2017
entitled “Om Prakash & Anr VS. Union of India &
Ors” before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
the garb of Judicial Order or interpretation of
Law; Non-Implementation of section 7(1) of RTI
Act by Central Registry, CIC New Delhi and Non-
disclosure of Complaint information concerning
“Life and Liberty” at the website of CIC, New
Delhi. The cause of action for Complaint u/s 18
of RTI Act 2005 arose against Patna High Court
for no reply by FAA and supply of false and
misleading information by PIO. However, out of
six second appeals, CIC has announced only one
decision on 25.09.2014 so far, which has also
not been complied either by Delhi State Legal
Services Authority or by Delhi High Court Legal
Service Committee (DHCLSC) as on date.

19. 23. That an Offence of PERJURY; abuse of
court process; 14 years long criminal
conspiracy; illegal confinement under house
arrest; backstabbing; evasion of rule of law by
the Advocates and Judges from lower court to
High Court to Supreme Court of India; NO ACTUAL
PARTY ONLY PROXY WAR THROUGH JUDGES IN TWO
STATES from Lower Court to High Court to Supreme
Court of India and Nine Cases have reached up to
Supreme Court of India till 03.02.2017 are the
main features of the whole petition.
24. That Widow Asha Rani Devi W/O Late
Shri Deep Narayan Poddar is petitioner No.02
(aged about 71 years & Oxygen dependent) herein
in the Appeal by way of motion through Crl. M.P.
D.No. 16166 of 2017 with Crl. M.P. D.No. 17593
of 2017 under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court
Rules 2013 against the Registrar’s Lodgment
Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.) D.NO.3913
of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. THE
REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR”.

20. 25. That the Registrar Misc. is habitual
and consistently involved in denying access to
justice and planned murder/encounter of
petitioners since 03.10.2016 by way of
suppressing record, tempering record,
circulating unregistered interlocutory
applications for Constitution bench, Lodging
petitions, circulating wrong office report
before Hon’ble Judges, circulating half
information before Hon’ble Judges and
circulating her own communications/letters only
and suppressing the communications/reply of the
petitioners in the office report before Hon’ble
Judges to shield/defend herself by the Hon’ble
Judges and to offend/victimize petitioners as of
now.
26. That the Registrar Misc. has
suppressed the factual record in office report
dated 20.10.2016 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and
in Office report dated 25.03.2017 in Curative
(Crl.)D 41026 of 2016. Interlocutory Application

21. vide D.NO.74930 dated 03.10.2016 for urgent
mentioning of the matter before Hon’ble the
Chief Justice of India’s Court in office report
dated 20.10.2016 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 has
been suppressed. Interlocutory applications vide
D.NO.77878 dated 18.10.2016 for Constitution
bench has been circulated unregistered in Writ
(Crl.) 136 of 2016. The reply of petitioner
dated 23.03.2017 against the Notification of
defects dated 23.03.2017 by the Registrar has
been suppressed in Office report dated
25.03.2017 in Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016
against which RTI vide JUSTC/R/2017/50390 dated
26.03.2017 and First Appeal vide Appeal
No.179/2017 have been filed by the petitioners.
The First Appeal has been heard by Mr. Sanjay
Parihar, Ld. Registrar (J-IV) cum FAA, Supreme
Court of India on 01.06.2017. Moreover, the
Registrar Misc. has neither supplied nor
uploaded Office report dated 30.11.2016 in
Review Petition (Crl.) 825 of 2016 as on date.
RTI vide JUSTC/R/2017/50412 dated 30.03.2017 has

22. been filed for obtaining Office report dated
30.11.2016 in Review Petition (Crl.) 825 of 2016
by the petitioners. Certified copy of office
report dated 20.10.2016 in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of
2016; Certified copy of office report dated NIL
in R.P.(Crl.) 825 of 2016; Certified copy of
office report dated 25.03.2017 and 28.04.2017 in
Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016 are annexed
herein as Annexure P-4 (Page from 68 to 78)
27. That Judicial order being reversed
from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by SDJM Ms Meena
Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under the
Judicature of Patna High Court at the behest of
Supreme Court of India.
28. That three updates of order sheet by
Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017 and
30.03.2017 are evident of this fact that
Judicial Murder is planned and designed from the
Supreme Court of India. Case Updates at
Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017 and

23. 30.03.2017 are annexed herein as Annexure P-5
(Page from 79 to 84)
29. That first update on 09.01.2017.
(Date of Hearing 02.01.2017. Next Date of
Hearing Not updated). Second update on
15.02.2017.( Next Date of Hearing 03.04.2017).
Third update on 30.03.2017. (Date of Hearing
22.03.2017. Next Date of Hearing 03.07.2017)
30. That these three updates by CJM
division Begusarai raises substantial question
of Law. How 22.03.2017 became the date of
hearing all of sudden while the date of hearing
was already fixed for 03.04.2017? Who tempered
the data at the e-court website? How Judicial
order being reversed from 03.04.2017 to
22.03.2017?
31. That the answers of these questions
are interlinked with the proceedings of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Because in

24. Supreme Court, Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of
2016 was forcibly listed by Registrar before
Hon'ble Justice Navin Sinha for direction on
27.03.2017. Because on 23.03.2017 the Registry
had Notified defects to remove Prayer(b) from
the Withdrawal Application of Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016. The Petitioner had
refused to remove the same at this Stage. The
Petitioner had reverted back the Registry on the
same date that he would not remove Prayer (b)
from Withdrawal Application of Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 AT THIS STAGE. Hence,
it was planned from Supreme Court and off the
record/confidential/indirect direction being
given from Supreme Court of India, therefore
scheduled date of hearing was changed all of
sudden from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by Ld. SDJM
Ms Meena Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under
the Judicature of Patna High Court. In nutshell,
whatever is happening at CJM division Begusarai
is Pre-Planned and being designed at the behest
of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and his associates

25. from Supreme Court of India.
32. That the petitioner has filed the
clarification with reasons against biased
Judiciary as to why the matter not to be listed
before Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gagoi, Hon’ble
Justice Prafulla Chandra Pant, Hon’ble Justice
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Hon’ble Justice Uday Umesh
Lalit and Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha vide
D.NO.42137 dated 19.05.2017 against the
Notification of defect vide D.NO.840/2017/X
dated 16.05.2017 in Crl. M.P. D.NO.17593 of 2017
in W.P.(Crl.)D.NO. 3913 of 2017 issued by the
Registrar Misc of this Hon’ble Court.
33. That the actual respondent has NOT
filed a single piece of paper throughout the
case from Trial Court to High Court of Delhi.
34. That the Hon’ble Judges have played
a role of respondents throughout the case.

26. 35. That the matter has been settled by
the High Court of Delhi in MATT.APPL. 7 of 2012
on 23.07.2013 with NO COST on the ground of
certified copy of Begusarai court in Bihar and
after SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no.
9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013 before this
Hon’ble Court. Application for early hearing
with receipt of delivery report of NOTICE of
motion vide ED881673094IN dated 29.04.2013 is
already on the record of SLP(C) No. 19073 of
2013 at page no. 165 to 169 annexed as Annexure
P-22 in the same petition. The service affidavit
with proof of delivery receipt of ED986320975IN
dated 08.12.2012 has also been put on the record
of High Court of Delhi on 22.01.2013 vide diary
no. 2376.
36. That the actual respondent has filed
two Criminal cases with two N.B.W before the CJM
division Begusarai Bihar and has supplied the
record of only one Criminal case with N.B.W to
the Trial Court at New Delhi on 09.02.2011 and

27. has concealed another Criminal case with
criminal intention. First Criminal case u/s D.V.
Act dated 30.03.2010 with N.B.W. dated
25.08.2010 and another criminal case u/s 498A
dated 07.02.2011 with N.B.W. dated 08.09.2011.
First one has been closed while second one has
been kept secret and has been disclosed through
RTI dated 27.08.2016. Application for
cancellation of N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 and
replication to Criminal case Complaint No. 9P of
2010 u/s D.V. Act has been filed by the
petitioners dated 03.03.2011 before CJM division
Begusarai are already on the record of SLP(C)
No. 19073 of 2013 at page no. 29 to 46 annexed
as Annexure P-2(Colly)in the same petition.
37. That this Hon’ble Court has evaded
the Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rules 2013 in
Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and dismissed the same
imposing liberty upon the petitioners to
approach High Court.

28. 38. That the petition raised substantial
question of Law as to the interpretation of
Constitution is required. Two states of
jurisdictions are involved for the same cause of
action and for the same relief. After winning
from High Court of Delhi petitioner is being
directed to approach Patna High Court for the
same cause of action and for the same relief.
39. That aggrieved by this, the
petitioner has filed Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of
2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF
INDIA & ORS” with Nine Prayers and nine reliefs
which has been Lodged by the Registrar dated
28.01.2017 by this Hon’ble Court.
40. That the petitioner in Writ (Crl.)
D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR
VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS” claiming relief of
Mandamus or prohibition or certiorari in respect
of cancellation of N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 issued
u/s 83 Cr.Pc. against the petitioners and

29. quashing the Criminal Case Complaint (P) No.
5591 of 2013 u/s 498A of IPC. The petitioners
also seek the dismissal and imprisonment against
the concerned Magistrate and Women Protection
Officer for an offence of perjury and illegal
confinement of the petitioners. The petitioners
also seek the removal of the legal aid Advocates
from the empanelment of the legal Aid
Institutions who were associated with the case
of the petitioners from the Trial Court to this
Hon’ble Court. The petitioners also seek
cancellation of registration no. 836/1991 of
Advocate Gopal Kumar and husband of Women
protection officer registered under Bihar State
Bar Council for an offence of perjury and seek
Rs. 50 Lakh as compensation for causing them
irreparable damage, loss and illegal
confinement. The petitioners also seek dismissal
against Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) and seek Rs. 50
Lakh as compensation for an offence of perjury
and keeping them captive and house arrest
illegally and causing them irreparable damage

30. and loss.
41. That under the above noted
circumstances Registrar of Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India has stopped the petitioners to agitate
the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India and spoiled the genuine nine reliefs of
petitioners prayed in Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of
2017.
42. That the husband of petitioner no.
02 has been encircled to death and the death
certificate of the husband of petitioner no.02
is already on the record of SLP(C) NO. 9854 of
2012 at page no. 18 to 22 annexed as Annexure P-
1; SLP(C) NO. 9483 of 2013 at page no. 18 to 22
annexed as Annexure P-1(Colly) and SLP(C) NO.
19073 of 2013 at page no. 24 to 28 annexed as
Annexure P-1(Colly) in the same petition. The
death certificate of petitioner no.02 is likely
to be on the SCR. Thereafter no one will be left

31. in her family and her life time acquired
property will be usurped by the Rtd. Justice
S.B. Sinha and his associates.
43. That the illiterate, before
independence born petitioner no.02 has earned
her property through ploughing her own
agricultural land, doing domestic household
works at her neighborhood and selling cow dung.
She is emotionally attached to her property and
wants to die at her own house not in Delhi.
However, she is being stopped to visit her own
house since two years due to disclosure of
N.B.W. u/s 83 Cr.Pc through RTI dated
27.08.2016. Hence, freedom of movement across
Indian Territory has been infringed by the Lower
Court under the Judicature of Patna High Court.
44. That the present application
contains the evidence against suppression of
records, denial of access to justice and planned
judicial murder/encounter designed by the

32. Supreme Court of India.
45. That this Hon’ble Court has complete
jurisdiction and power to allow the present
application for urgent hearing of Appeal by way
of motion against the Lodgment Order dated
16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued
by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under
Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules,
2013.
PRAYER
In the above premises, it is prayed that this
Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) To allow the application for urgent
hearing of Appeal by way of motion
against the Lodgment Order dated
16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of
2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme
Court of India under Order XV Rule 5
of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

33. (ii) To direct the Registrar to register
the W.P.(Crl.)D.NO.3913 of 2017 and
allow the petitioners to agitate
against suppression of records, denial
of access to justice and planned
judicial murder/encounter designed by
the Supreme Court of India before
Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s
Court for urgent relief.
(iii) Pass such other order/orders as this
Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper
in the facts and circumstances of the
case.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
Om Prakash
Petitioner No.01
On behalf of Petitioner No.02

34. S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
Rented R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar, Part-2, Palam Colony,
New Delhi-110077
Mob: 9968337815
Email: om.poddar@gmail.com
Widow Asha Rani Devi
Petitioner No.02
W/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS
Shukkar Hatt, Near Durga Mandir
Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar-855114
NEW DELHI:
Filed on: 05.06.2017
Diary No. 45930

35. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
CRL.M.P. D.NO.16166 OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO.3913 OF 2017
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
AFFIDAVIT
I, Om Prakash S/o Late Deep Narayan Poddar, aged
44 years, R/o RZF/893, Netaji Subash Marg, Raj
Nagar Part-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi - 77, do

36. hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as
under:-
1.That I am the Petitioner in the above matter
and well conversant with the facts of the
case as such competent to swear this
affidavit.
2. That the contents of the accompanying
application for urgent hearing of Appeal by
way of motion against the Lodgment Order
dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of
2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court
of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 which has been drafted by
me [para 01 to 45.], [Page 01 to 32] and I,
As. and having understood the contents
thereof I say that the facts state therein
are correct which are based on the official
record.

37. 3. That the accompanying application for urgent
hearing contains total pages 84.’
4. That the annexures are true copies of their
respective originals.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
I, the above-named deponent do hereby verify that
the facts stated in the above affidavit are true
to my knowledge and belief. No part of the same
is false and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
Verified at New Delhi on this the 5th
day of June,
2017.
DEPONENT