Petition before Hon'ble President of India prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India against Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai Bihar

1. Date: 11.05.2016
To,
The Hon’ble President of India
SUB: COMPLAINT AGAINST CJM COURT BEGUSARAI,
BIHAR AND MS VEENA KUMARI, PROTECTION OFFICER
(UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN AGAINST DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE ACT 2005) BEGUSARAI BIHAR-reg.
Hon’ble Sir,
1.Hon’ble sir, the undersigned is petitioner,
named Om Prakash S/O Late Sh Deep Narayan
Poddar R/O Asha Deep Niwas, Shukkar Hat, Durga
Mandir, Sonaili, Kadwa, Katihar, Bihar-855114
and rented R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg,
Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, New Delhi-
110077.
2.Hon’ble sir, Protection officer (Under
protection of women against domestic violence
Act 2005) has misused and abused her vested
power by way of instituting frivolous
litigation vide case No. 9P/2010 dated
31.03.2010 before CJM Court Begusarai, Bihar
after a gap of 6 years from the date of

2. occurrence dated 24.06.2004 for her own vested
interest and managed to get issued a frivolous
N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 through her husband
Gopal Kumar, Advocate (Reg. No. 836/1991),
district court, Begusarai against me and my
ailing old age mother through SP Begusarai
while I was struggling to save the life of my
mother in ICU of AIIMS at New Delhi.
Replication and cancellation of N.B.W have been
filed by me on 03.03.2011 against this
frivolous case at Begusarai Court in Bihar. It
is also on the Supreme Court Record with SLP(C)
no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no. 9483/2013 and SLP(C)
no. 19073/2013.
3.Hon’ble sir, the client of protection officer
appeared before Trial Court at New Delhi but
did not file written statement (WS) before
Trial Court at New Delhi and did not join High
Court of Delhi even after receipt of service
Notice which is also on the Supreme Court
Record.
4.Hon’ble sir, after the pronouncement of Ex-
parte Judgment by the High Court of Delhi in
favour of me in MAT. APPL. 7/2012 on
23.07.2013; second time protection officer has

3. instituted another frivolous criminal case vide
case no. 5591/2013 u/s 498A/323 of IPC and u/s
3/4 of D.P. Act with filing date 07.02.2011 and
first hearing date 05.12.2013 without the
knowledge of me. It is pertinent to note here
that the client of protection officer has
appeared before the Trial Court at New Delhi on
09.02.2011 in case No. HMA-700/2010 before
Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka Court at
New Delhi and intentionally did not mention
criminal case no. 5591/2013 filing date
7.2.2011 u/s 498A/323 of IPC and u/s 3/4 of D.P
Act to the Trial Court.
5.Hon’ble sir, the marriage was fraudulent with
misrepresentation of bride in 2004. I have
never ever been to the residence of rich Indian
Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) client of protection
officer in my whole life. I even do not know
the multiple residential addresses of rich IOCL
client of protection officer since 12 years.
For the first time I came to know the official
address of rich IOCL client of protection
officer on 09.02.2011 when she supplied the
proceedings of Begusarai Court against case no.
9P/2010 before the Trial Court at New Delhi.

4. 6.Hon’ble sir, No FIR, No written statement (WS)
by the client of protection officer before the
Trial Court at New Delhi, No appearance by the
client of protection officer before the High
Court of Delhi, yet frivolous criminal cases
are continuing for the same cause of action
even after the settlement by the High Court of
Delhi in the case No. MAT. APPL. 7/2012 in
2013.
7.Hon’ble sir, after winning the case MAT. APPL.
7/2012 in 2013, I have visited thrice to my
parental house in Bihar and have not received
any Notice or Summon against u/s 498A/323 of
IPC and u/s 3/4 of D.P. Act as on date.
8.Hon’ble sir, it is a backstabbing plans to
create and repeat another Kanahiya case (of
17th
February, 2016 inside the Patiala House
Court premises at New Delhi) in the premises of
Begusarai Court against me and my mother.
9.Hon’ble sir, it also violates the directions of
Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been laid down
in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar
in Cr APP No. 1277 of 2014.

5. 10. Hon’ble sir, three untimely deaths have
been occurred in my family since 12 years. My
family has been reduced to one member family
i.e. ailing old age mother only now and the
criminal conspiracy through misusing Government
machineries are increasing day by day against
me and my mother.
11. Hon’ble sir, if these misused Government
machineries who are indulged in designing and
planting criminal conspiracies since 12 years
against me and my mother are not being stopped
and not being punished then I and my mother
will also disappear untimely like an untimely
demise of my father in 2007 and my property
will be usurped by the client of the protection
officer and no one will be left in my family to
report to the Hon’ble President of India.
12. Hon’ble sir, it has been observed over the
period of 12 years that these misused
Government machineries are from the same
community i.e. Kayasth caste viz. S.B. Sinha,
Retd. Chief Justice of Delhi High Court;
Praveen Kumar, C&MD, Indian Drugs &
Pharmaceuticals Ltd; Veena Kumari, Protection

6. officer Begusarai; her husband, Gopal Kumar,
Advocate district court, Begusarai; Yugal
Kishore Sinha, DSP, Katihar; Nawal Kishore
Sinha, Accountant, SBI, ADB Sonaili Bazar,
Katihar; Dhirendra Prasad, Advocate, district
court, Katihar and Hari Prasad, Assistant
Commissioner, Food supplies & consumer affairs,
Dwarka, New Delhi.
13. Hon’ble sir, these misused Government
machineries have turned my parental house into
public toilet with the help of SP Katihar and
local Mukhiya, Mr. Bihari Lal Bubna in the
midst of religious gathering called Bhagwat
w.e.f 28.02.2016 to 05.03.2016. Fax complaints
and electronic complaints have been forwarded
to all concern state government agencies
against the same on 03.03.2016. Complaint also
has been forwarded to Chief Minister
Secretariat (CMSEC) through Bihar Public
Grievance Redressal System vide complaint
number 99999-0303160113 and 99999- 1703160139
dated 03.03.2016 and 29.03.2016. No action has
been taken so far.

7. 14. Hon’ble sir, Advocate Dhirendra Prasad,
District Court, Katihar (Reg. No. 963/1990), has
given a threat to the life of the petitioner
and his pensioned mother to render apology or
to face criminal case u/s 500 of IPC against
the Notice u/s 80 CPC to SBI accountant and
Bank manager sonaili, Katihar. Notice u/s 80
CPC to SBI Sonaili Katihar has been sent for
attacking the pension account of customer,
harassing the customer unnecessarily, not
removing KYC alert, refusing to open ATM
machine for withdrawal, planning to hack the
ATM pin of customer, tracking the customer till
Delhi with ulterior motive and establishing
nexus with Dwarka SBI Branch to hack the ATM
pin of customer. Revenue of property of the
petitioner’s mother has been attacked by the
Branch Manager SBI Sonaili in the garb of Green
Remit Card (GRC), while GRC is not mandatory
and it is not applicable for home branch. Home
Branch Manager, SBI Sonaili did not let the
attendant of petitioner’s mother to deposit her
own cash from property into her own saving
account.
15. Hon’ble sir, these misused Government
machineries are not letting me to live in Bihar

8. as well as in Delhi infringing my right to life
or personal liberty under Article 21.
16. Hon’ble sir, my Writ (C) 90 of 2016 has
been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India as the Hon’ble court did not find any
ground under Article 32 of Constitution of
India to entertain this petition.
17. Hon’ble Sir, Whether I have right to live
or not?
18. Hon’ble sir, on the basis of the above
facts and circumstances, it is accordingly
prayed that an appropriate action to be
initiated against the CJM court Begusarai,
Bihar; Ms Veena Kumari, protection officer,
Begusarai Bihar; Advocate Gopal Kumar District
court Begusarai, Bihar(Reg. No. 836/1991);
Advocate Dhirendra Prasad, District Court,
Katihar Bihar(Reg. No. 963/1990); SP Katihar,
Bihar and Sh Bihari Lal Bubna, Mukhiya Kantiya
Panchayat, Sonaili, Kadwa, Katihar, Bihar
against the consistent designing and planting
of criminal conspiracy against me and my (70

9. year old ailing) mother and also against the
pursuance of frivolous criminal litigation
against me and my mother for the same cause of
action which has been settled by the High Court
of Delhi in MAT. APPL. 7/2012 in 2013, in the
furtherance of Justice.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 11.05.2016