President of India forwarded Complaint vide PRSEC/E/2016/06805 dated 10.05.2016 to Registrar General Patna High Court on 08.06.2016 prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India

1. 8/5/2017 :: Grievance Status ::
http://pgportal.gov.in/ViewStatusForm.aspx?useraction=settings$JS=cb0S7GsbhnmfRyDh 1/2
Status as on 05 Aug 2017
Registration
Number
: PRSEC/E/2016/06805
Name Of
Complainant
: OM PRAKASH
Date of
Receipt
: 10 May 2016
Received by : President's Secretariat
Forwarded
to
: Department of Justice
Contact
Address
: Jaisalmer House,
Mansingh Road,
New Delhi110011
Contact
Number
: 23381496
Grievance
Description
: To, The Hon’ble President of India SUB: COMPLAINT AGAINST CJM COURT
BEGUSARAI, BIHAR AND MS VEENA KUMARI, PROTECTION OFFICER (UNDER
PROTECTION OF WOMEN AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT 2005) BEGUSARAI
BIHAR-reg. Hon’ble Sir, 1. Hon’ble sir, the undersigned is petitioner, named Om Prakash SO
Late Sh Deep Narayan Poddar RO Asha Deep Niwas, Shukkar Hat, Durga Mandir, Sonaili,
Kadwa, Katihar, Bihar-855114 and rented RO RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg, Raj Nagar Part-2,
Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077. 2. Hon’ble sir, Protection officer (Under protection of
women against domestic violence Act 2005) has misused and abused her vested power by way
of instituting frivolous litigation vide case No. 9P of 2010 dated 31.03.2010 before CJM Court
Begusarai, Bihar after a gap of 6 years from the date of occurrence dated 24.06.2004 for her own
vested interest and managed to get issued a frivolous N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 through her
husband Gopal Kumar, Advocate (Reg. No. 836 of 1991), district court, Begusarai against me
and my ailing old age mother through SP Begusarai while I was struggling to save the life of my
mother in ICU of AIIMS at New Delhi. Replication and cancellation of N.B.W have been filed
by me on 03.03.2011 against this frivolous case at Begusarai Court in Bihar. It is also on the
Supreme Court Record with SLP(C) no. 9854 of 2012, SLP(C) no. 9483 of 2013 and SLP(C) no.
19073 of 2013. 3. Hon’ble sir, the client of protection officer appeared before Trial Court at New
Delhi but did not file written statement (WS) before Trial Court at New Delhi and did not join
High Court of Delhi even after receipt of service Notice which is also on the Supreme Court
Record. 4. Hon’ble sir, after the pronouncement of Ex-parte Judgment by the High Court of
Delhi in favour of me in MAT. APPL. 7of 2012 on 23.07.2013; second time protection officer
has instituted another frivolous criminal case vide case no. 5591 of 2013 us 498A 323 of IPC
and us 34 of D.P. Act with filing date 07.02.2011 and first hearing date 05.12.2013 without the
knowledge of me. It is pertinent to note here that the client of protection officer has appeared
before the Trial Court at New Delhi on 09.02.2011 in case No. HMA-700 of 2010 before
Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka Court at New Delhi and intentionally did not mention
criminal case no. 5591 of 2013 filing date 7.2.2011 us 498A 323 of IPC and us 3 4 of D.P Act to
the Trial Court. 5. Hon’ble sir, the marriage was fraudulent with misrepresentation of bride in
2004. I have never ever been to the residence of rich Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) client
of protection officer in my whole life. I even do not know the multiple residential addresses of
rich IOCL client of protection officer since 12 years. For the first time I came to know the
official address of rich IOCL client of protection officer on 09.02.2011 when she supplied the
proceedings of Begusarai Court against case no. 9P of 2010 before the Trial Court at New Delhi.
6. Hon’ble sir, No FIR, No written statement (WS) by the client of protection officer before the
Trial Court at New Delhi, No appearance by the client of protection officer before the High

2. 8/5/2017 :: Grievance Status ::
http://pgportal.gov.in/ViewStatusForm.aspx?useraction=settings$JS=cb0S7GsbhnmfRyDh 2/2
Court of Delhi, yet frivolous criminal cases are continuing for the same cause of action even
after the settlement by the High Court of Delhi in the case No. MAT. APPL. 7 of 2012 in 2013.
7. Hon’ble sir, after winning the case MAT. APPL. 7 of 2012 in 2013, I have visited thrice to my
parental house in Bihar and have not received any Notice or Summon against us 498A 323 of
IPC and us 3 4 of D.P. Act as on date. 8. Hon’ble sir, it is a backstabbing plans to create and
repeat another Kanahiya case (of 17th February, 2016 inside the Patiala House Court premises at
New Delhi) in the premises of Begusarai Court against me and my mother. 9. Hon’ble sir, it also
violates the directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been laid down in the case of
Arnesh Kumar Vs State
Current
Status
: CASE CLOSED
Date of
Action
: 08 Jun 2016
Details :
The grievance has been forwarded to the Registrar General, Patna High Court for further action,
as appropriate.