The present article was initially published on 24th December 2007 in AfroArticles, Buzzle and the American Chronicle. It was republished in 2010 here: http://themasonic.blogspot.com/2010/ This article is the fourth of a series of articles about Turkey and France, as permanently rival countries throughout History. The first three articles of the series are here: "Turkey, Kurds, France and Freemasonic Messianism" https://www.academia.edu/42964848/Turkey_Kurds_France_and_Freemasonic_Messianism "Turkey, Kurds, Anglo-French Freemasonry, Islam, and Orientalism" https://www.academia.edu/24266848/Turkey_Kurds_Anglo-French_Freemasonry_Islam_and_Orientalism_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis Turkey and 'Kurdistan': How to Outfox the Anglo-French Freemasonic Plot https://www.academia.edu/42972363/Turkey_and_Kurdistan_How_to_Outfox_the_Anglo-French_Freemasonic_Plot Excerpt: Before the rise of the Anglo-French colonialism in Africa, the Ottoman territories on the Black Continent constituted the largest African empire throughout six millennia of African History. Of course, contrarily to the alien Anglo-French colonials, the Ottoman Empire was the authentic and representative political institution for all the African Muslims from Algeria to Egypt and thence to Somalia and Tanzania. For more than 300 years, the Ottoman Empire was in Africa far more successful and much better embedded than the Roman Empire (30 BCE – 313 CE), and the Christian Eastern Roman Empire (313 – 642 CE). Among all Islamic political institutions that controlled parts of the Black Continent, the Ottoman Empire lasted longer, and was far closer to the average people, who were very enthusiastic in their support of, and contribution to, the academic, intellectual, military, and political activities of the vast Caliphate.

1. Turkey's Global Strategy against the
Freemasonic Anglo-French elites: the
Afro-Asiatic Alliance
Turkey is better placed than India, Russia or China to conceptualize an Anti-
Colonial, 'Oriental' Vision of colonial-free, Liberated and Democratic Africa.
In three earlier articles, entitled "Turkey, Kurds, France and Freemasonic
Messianism"
(https://www.academia.edu/42964848/Turkey_Kurds_France_and_Freemasonic_
Messianism), "Turkey, Kurds, Anglo-French Freemasonry, Islam, and
Orientalism" (https://www.academia.edu/24266848/Turkey_Kurds_Anglo-
French_Freemasonry_Islam_and_Orientalism_-
_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis), and "Turkey and
'Kurdistan': How to Outfox the Anglo-French Freemasonic Plot"
(https://www.academia.edu/42972363/Turkey_and_Kurdistan_How_to_Outfox_th

2. e_Anglo-French_Freemasonic_Plot), we emphasized that Turkey’s Kurdish issue
consists in just a facet of a far more crucial problem, namely a long lasting
Anti-Ottoman and Anti-Turkish conspiracy geared for the eschatological
needs of an Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that controls the colonial
establishments of France and England.
We identified the reasons of the Kurdish problem as both, internal and
external, and we proposed, as remedy for the internal reasons, the
transformation of Turkey into a new, multicultural state; we asserted that a
similar development would deprive the interfering colonial powers from
significant internal support that has been mobilized in Turkey by the agents
of France and England, who portray themselves as advocates of an otherwise
non-existent Kurdish nation.
We then placed the Kurdish problem within a far wider context, namely the
surface of the Ottoman Empire, and finally we contextualized everything
within the circumference of the Orient, a created concept that comprises parts
of Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa. We suggested that Turkey should prepare
for a long perspective battle of primarily academic, cultural, educational,
intellectual and socio-behavioural character, targeting first to refute the fake
division Orient vs. Occident, and second to reject the Western system of
Humanities as misrepresentation of the History of the Mankind.
All this as a vast academic – intellectual project may require thousands of
specialists involved in each of many cooperating countries in Asia and Africa.
If the effort of eliminating the Colonial, Anglo-French, Freemasonic pseudo-
History of the Mankind is not undertaken, the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge
will be left with a great privilege that they will never cease to use at the
prejudice of Turkey and all the rest. In this regard, we asserted that when a
country has been the century-long target of adversary establishments, it is
disastrous of this country's rulers to imagine that they would thwart the plot
by means of a short term policy.
We then enumerated the proper targets for Turkey’s global strategy, which
should be directed against the Anglo-French establishment and generate great
obstacles for the plans of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge. Presenting
suggestions per geopolitical area, we described what the targets of a Turkish
policy should be as regards Europe, Germany, Russia and America. In the
present article, we will complete the presentation by focusing on Turkey’s
policy in Asia and Africa.
It would be essential to mention at this point that Turkey should view its
relations with Russia, India and China holistically; we mentioned briefly
Turkey's proper policy toward Russia, as it also hinges on Turkey’s relations
with Europe. However, it would be necessary for these four countries to enter
into an alliance of Peace and Concord in Asia, and to expand their

3. cooperation in Africa, working together the US, against the colonial structures
set and still defended by France and England.
Turkey – Russia – India – China
Turkey’s top interests impose a new geopolitical vision for the greater Asiatic
landmass. There are many issues on which the four countries' interests are
parallel; issues pertaining to Energy, Global Power and Strategic Stability,
Environment, Development and National Identity and Culture bring these
four countries into a logical mutual agreement and defense treaty. It would be
wrong to see in this an Anti-American attitude. Turkey and India are two
countries with traditionally good relations with America.
America should even favor the rise of an Asiatic Alliance that would help
outmaneuver the Anti-American tendency of the European Union. Contrarily
to what many believe, the Anti-American nucleus of the EU is not the
ostensible and superficial axis Paris – Berlin, but the secretive and profound
bond Paris – London.
This means that that the same Anglo-French colonial establishment, which is
known for its Anti-Ottoman and Anti-Turkish empathy, pursued policies
against:
1. America: England and France never accepted the existence of America as a
reality, and their anti-American policies comprised all methods that could
possibly either destroy America or make the US depart from the principles
and values of the Founding Fathers. The two colonial powers wanted either to
use the States in their favor (WW I, WW II, Cold War) or to engage the US
administration in wars of attrition (Vietnam, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq).
Creating a false problem in order to push America to solve it and damage the
US in the process is the epitome of the Anglo-French genius in all its splendid
inhumanity.
2. India: England and France always perceived all Indians, Hindus or
Muslims, Sikh or Parsis, in culturally and racially discriminatory terms.
3. Russia: England and France deployed systematic effort and extraordinary
energy, for several centuries, to prevent Russia from having free access to
harbors in the Southern Seas (Mediterranean, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, Indian
Ocean), while also ceaselessly fueling internal strives in Asia (Ottoman
Empire vs. Russia, Russia vs. Safavid Iran, Ottoman Empire vs. Iran, Iran vs.
Mughal India, Japan vs. Russia, etc.).
4. China: this was the top target of the pre-WW I colonial powers; in the
period 1910 – 1914, Russia, Japan, Germany, Austria – Hungary, America,
England and France were all present there, and were desperately trying to
figure out balanced ways to divide China into many zones of influence.
Finally, Japan got maximum benefit of the propinquity, and of the severe

4. exhaustion of resources that WW I caused to all warring parts (except
America), and progressively invaded the entire coastal part of China.
America must understand that in order to prevail in North and South
America (where England mobilizes all sorts of combinations of forces to
oppose the US) and expand its sphere of influence in Africa and Australia, a
cooperation with all the major Asiatic forces is needed; as a matter of fact,
peace and stability in Asia is key to America’s global success.
Asia must therefore rise as the central landmass of the global economy, and
the interconnection of its parts must advance in parallel with the cooperation
of the four greater land forces. Japan, despite its financial strength, and
Indonesia, despite its population, are peripheral to Asia. This does not mean
that they have to be ignored by the four central powers of the Asiatic Alliance;
on the contrary, they must be integrated in the process by means of numerous
projects.
Everything however hinges on the corridors of energy that are to be shaped in
the coming few years, and on the highways and the railways that have to
bring China and East Siberia closer to Moscow, Istanbul, Yemen, and the
Indian South.
With Turkey mounting a Union of Turkic Countries, Russia and China will
not be threatened; on the contrary, Russia will get closer to the South and
China will be closer to the West.
With Turkey expanding in, and reshaping, the Middle East and the Iranian
Plateau, a new, secular and multicultural version of Islam will be diffused, not
only in the area of the Turkic speaking Central Asiatic countries, the Iranian
Plateau, and the Middle East, but also among the Muslims of Russia and
China, and the hundreds of millions of Muslims of the Subcontinent
(Pakistan, India and Bangladesh are home to more than 450 million of
Muslims).
The cooperation among all the members of the Asiatic Alliance should cover
all levels, culture, economy, science, politics, religion, communication,
education, defense, space, etc. All the members of the Asiatic landmass
should converge through extensive academic programs, governmental and
entrepreunerial cooperation, mutual investment plans, energy resources’
rational partition, and vast cultural exchanges that would minimize any non-
Asiatic influence and impact on any part of Asia.
Eliminating any regime that would function as local agent of European
colonial powers would be the key to final success.
Pulling Germany into the great Asiatic landmass reunification will be the

5. foremost factor of ultimate success; not only the Dream Berlin – Baghdad
should be revivified, but Germany should be conceptualized as the Epitome
of the Orient where the real markets for the German exports are to be located.
An Asiatic Union should rise at the end to guarantee peace, stability, progress
and development, solidarity and fraternity among the regrettably dissociated
members of the vast landmass that have long been the undeserved victims of
colonial exploitation and the unfortunate targets of inhuman hatred. Parts of
Eastern Europe should also be accepted to minimize as much as possible the
scope of the victims of the Anglo-French plot.
A Turkish Policy for Africa
Before the rise of the Anglo-French colonialism in Africa, the Ottoman
territories on the Black Continent constituted the largest African empire
throughout six millennia of African History. Of course, contrarily to the alien
Anglo-French colonials, the Ottoman Empire was the authentic and
representative political institution for all the African Muslims from Algeria to
Egypt and thence to Somalia and Tanzania.
For more than 300 years, the Ottoman Empire was in Africa far more
successful and much better embedded than the Roman Empire (30 BCE – 313
CE), and the Christian Eastern Roman Empire (313 – 642 CE).
Among all Islamic political institutions that controlled parts of the Black
Continent, the Ottoman Empire lasted longer, and was far closer to the
average people, who were very enthusiastic in their support of, and
contribution to, the academic, intellectual, military, and political activities of
the vast Caliphate.
Egyptians excelled in the Observatory of Istanbul, Algerians led the naval
battles against the Spaniards, and the Somalis developed great political
institutions in the name of the Sultan. All this reality has been kept secret
because of the perverse educational systems set up by the alien French and
British racists, who tried to diffuse historical falsehood through the selected
local agents – traitors, like for example the fallacy that the Ottomans had been
foreign to Africa or the historical distortion that Istanbul disregarded the
African peoples.
By definition Turkey, as an Ottoman derivative political institution, is better
placed than India, Russia or China to conceptualize and share with its Asiatic
partners an anti-colonial, ‘Oriental’ vision of colonialism-free, liberated and
democratic Africa where all will have their place, i.e. a continent from which
the colonial falsehood and perversion will be erased. It is in Africa where
Turkey, with the help of America, Russia, India and China, will take a definite
revenge over France and England, helping local nations to achieve
independence and nation-building, democracy and development.

6. It will be essential for Turkey to explain to America and to the three Asiatic
giants that, as in Europe and in Asia, wider unions can only be achieved in
Africa after the liberation of subjugated and currently oppressed nations and
following a thorough nation-building effort. Afro-Asiatic interconnectedness
will be essential in this regard and the African Americans will have to play a
major role in re-writing the erratic White History of the Mankind, which
consists in a serious threat against:
1. the formation of the African Identity
2. the Ideals of the American Founding Fathers
3. the Weltanschauung of German Humanism
4. the Values of the Italian Renaissance Universalism
5. the Doctrines of Oriental Christianity and Islam
6. the Ottoman and Islamic Heritage
7. the Moral Order of Hinduism
8. the Buddhist Ethics
9. the Moral Prescriptions of Confucianism, and
10. the Need of the Mankind to explore the African Cushitic Originality.
Thus, Turkey -coming back to Africa 500 years after the arrival of Sultan
Selim I- will implement Ataturk's famous dictum "Yurtta Sulh, Cihanda Sulh"
(Peace at Home, Peace in the World), by sharing with partners of our global
world the universal values of the Ottoman Empire, the world’s most tolerant
major state before the rise of America.
Note
Picture: Selim I
By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Published: 12/24/2007