This thesis presentation summarizes a parametric study of reinforced concrete buildings considering different building codes in Bangladesh. The study analyzed 4 model buildings of varying heights from 6 to 12 stories using ETABS software under the BNBC 2006 and BNBC 2020 building codes. The results show variations in lateral displacement, drift ratio, base shear, and other parameters between the two building codes. The highest displacement and drift occurred for the tallest 12-story building model under both codes.

1. WELCOME
TO
OUR THESIS PRESENTATION
GROUP NO: 03
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
DHAKA UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, GAZIPUR

2. PARAMETRIC STUDY OF RC BUILDING
CONSIDERING DIFFERENT BUILDING
CODES
SUPERVISOR
Dr. Md. Khasro Miah
Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur
THESIS BY
Chandon Mondol (161109)
M M Alamgir Hossain (161072)
Md Ekramul Hasan (161075)

3. CONTENTS OF
THE PRESENTATION
 Introduction
 Objectives of the study
 Literature review
 Methodology
 Plan view
 Layout plan
 Modeling and numerical analysis
 Results
 Conclusion
 Recommendation for future study

4. INTRODUCTION
Analysis and design of Reinforcement Concrete (RC) building of
every country is based on their geographical location. Every
country has specific building design codes which provide the
standards to engineers for the design of various structural
components.
To identify the changes in the analysis of reinforced concrete
structure a comparative study is necessary between BNBC 2020
and BNBC 2006. This study aims to compare the result obtain
from lateral load analysis considering BNBC 2020 and BNBC
2006 for a number of model buildings with constant floor area
in Dhaka city of Bangladesh.

5. The objectives of this study are as follows:
To analyze a number of model buildings considering BNBC 2006
(UBC-94) and BNBC 2020 (ASCE 7-05) using ETABS.
To observe lateral displacement, drift ratio, storey shear, storey
stiffness and base shear of RC buildings considering BNBC 2006
(UBC-94) and BNBC 2020 (ASCE 7-05) using ETABS.
To compare the numerical behavior of different parameters under
BNBC 2006 (UBC-94) and BNBC 2020 (ASCE 7-05) using ETABS.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

6.  F. Atique and Z. Wadud (2015) comparison of various provisions for
earthquake and wind analysis codes of different countries. Bangladesh
National Building Code, 1993 (BNBC 93), Uniform Building Codes,
National Building Code of India, 1983 (NBC India-83).
 P.R.Bose, R.Dubey and M.A.Yazdi(2017) compares the seismic
provisions for multi-storeyed framed buildings of various counties.
The provisions compared are Building Standard Law of Japan (BSLJ)
1981, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures IS :1893-
1984(IS), National Building Code of Canada 1985(NBC), New
Zealand Standard (NZS) 4203:1984 and uniform building code-
1988(UBC).
LITERATURE REVIEW

7. LITERATURE REVIEW
 Marjan FAIZIAN and Yuji ISHIYAMA (2012) compares codes of
BSL-J, IBC and Iran. The fundamental natural period of the structure
is calculated by formulas are specified for the base shear and the
distribution of lateral forces over the height of the buildings.
Vinit Dhanvijay et. al (2009) comparison of international standards.
The paper studies the main contributing factors that lead to poor
performance of Structure during the earthquake. The G+10,Special RC
moment-resting frame Modelling of the structure is done as per Staad
pro.

8. METHODOLOGY
The method of Equivalent Static Analysis has been preferred
by using ETABS software as follows:
 The grid of the plan is prepared.
 Properties are defined to models.
 Properties of slab, beams and columns are given.
 Define the static load cases and apply them to slab and
beams.
 Assign the support condition as a fixed support to the
bottom.

9. METHODOLOGY
 Define diaphragm and mass sources.
 Adjust the data according to BNBC 2006 or BNBC 2020
for applying Earthquake and Wind load.
 Run the analysis and various results are obtained.
Designs are carried out and then select all the beams and
columns to assign hinge properties. Moment and shear
hinges are considered for beam element; and axial with
biaxial moment hinges are considered for column
elements.

10. PLAN VIEW

11. LAYOUT PLAN

12. MODELING AND NUMERICALANALYSIS
Open ETABS
1. Initialization Thesis Model
1. Quick Template
1. New Window of ETABS
1. Create Model For Analysis

13. 1. Define Materials Properties
MODELING AND NUMERICALANALYSIS

14. MODELING AND NUMERICALANALYSIS
1. Define Section Properties

15. Building Description:
In this analysis ETABS software is used. Same building
plan is used following four different height. The model
types are Model 1 (G+11 : 12 storied), Model 2 (G+9 :
10 storied), Model 3 (G+7 : 8 storied) and Model 4
(G+5 : 6 storied) . Same types of column, beam, grade
beam are used for all types of model.
MODELING AND NUMERICALANALYSIS

16. MODELING AND NUMERICALANALYSIS

17. RESULTS
• Numerical and Graphical
Representations
BASE SHEAR
928
893
842
774
635
567
489
400
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
580
558
526
484
423
378
326
266
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
Figure 4.1 Base shear for different Model (IMRF)
Figure 4.2 Base shear for different Model (SMRF)
Sl no.
Base Shear(kip)
SMRF IMRF
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006 BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
Model 1
(G+11)
580 423 928 635
Model 2
(G+9)
558 378 893 567
Model 3
(G+7)
526 326 842 489
Model 4
(G+5)
484 266 774 400

18. • Numerical and Graphical
Representations
RESULTS
 Model Type-1 (Story Displacement)
Height (ft)
Displacement (in)
Story BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.198 0.153 0.179 0.113
1F 18 0.764 0.555 0.694 0.360
2F 28 1.421 1.030 1.333 0.705
3F 38 2.075 1.498 2.013 1.082
4F 48 2.693 1.937 2.693 1.466
5F 58 3.262 2.339 3.347 1.845
6F 68 3.772 2.701 3.958 2.209
7F 78 4.220 3.019 4.513 2.552
8F 88 4.602 3.292 5.007 2.869
9F 98 4.929 3.518 5.437 3.157
10F 108 5.217 3.696 5.804 3.416
11F 118 5.447 3.830 6.116 3.647
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+11 : 12 storied
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+11 : 12 storied
Lateral Displacement for Model 1 in Y-direction
Lateral Displacement for Model 1 in X-direction

19. • Numerical and Graphical
Representations
RESULTS
 Model Type-2 (Story Displacement)
Height (ft)
Displacement (in)
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.184 0.127 0.132 0.103
1F 18 0.585 0.425 0.523 0.266
2F 28 1.082 0.784 0.995 0.517
3F 38 1.564 1.129 1.486 0.784
4F 48 2.008 1.444 1.964 1.049
5F 58 2.400 1.721 2.409 1.303
6F 68 2.737 1.957 2.809 1.539
7F 78 3.013 2.151 3.159 1.753
8F 88 3.228 2.301 3.456 1.943
9F 98 3.404 2.409 3.705 2.110
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+9 : 10 storied
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+9 : 10 storied
Lateral Displacement for Model 2 in X-direction
Lateral Displacement for Model 2 in Y-direction

20.  Model Type-3 (Story displacement)
• Numerical and Graphical
Representations
RESULTS
Height (ft)
Displacement (in)
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.115 0.088 0.096 0.051
1F 18 0.427 0.311 0.363 0.185
2F 28 0.781 0.567 0.682 0.355
3F 38 1.115 0.805 1.002 0.529
4F 48 1.406 1.012 1.299 0.694
5F 58 1.648 1.180 1.562 0.844
6F 68 1.837 1.309 1.785 0.975
7F 78 1.973 1.400 1.968 1.086
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+7 : 8 storied
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+7 : 8 storied
Lateral Displacement for Model 3 in X-direction
Lateral Displacement for Model 3 in Y-direction

21. RESULTS
• Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-4 (Storey displacement)
Height(ft)
Displacement (in)
Story BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.077 0.060 0.060 0.034
1F 18 0.282 0.205 0.225 0.119
2F 28 0.507 0.368 0.413 0.223
3F 38 0.705 0.509 0.590 0.322
4F 48 0.862 0.618 0.740 0.407
5F 58 0.975 0.694 0.861 0.475
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+5 : 6 storied
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Height
(ft)
Displacement (in)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+5 : 6 storied
Lateral Displacement for Model 4 in X-direction
Lateral Displacement for Model 4 in Y-direction

22. RESULTS
Graphical comparison of deflection for models
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Height
(ft)
Deflection (in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
(5.447,118)
(3.404,98)
(1.973,78)
(0.975,58)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5
Height
(ft)
Deflection (in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
(3.830,118)
(2.4069,98)
(1.40,78)
(0.694,58)
Deflection for Models in X-direction (BNBC 2020) Deflection for Models in Y-direction (BNBC 2020)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Height
(ft)
Deflection (in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
(0.861,58)
(1.968,78)
(3.705,98)
(6.116,118)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Height
(ft)
Deflection (in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
(0.475,58)
(1.086,78)
(2.110,98)
(3.647,118)
Deflection for Models in X-direction (BNBC 2006)
Deflection for Models in Y-direction (BNBC 2006)

23. RESULTS
• Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-1 (Drift ratio)
Height(ft)
Drift Ratio
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.002072 0.001582 0.001852 0.001007
1F 18 0.004729 0.003401 0.004333 0.00223
2F 28 0.005479
0.003964
0.005324 0.002879
3F 38 0.00545 0.003898 0.005665 0.003136
4F 48 0.005153 0.003658 0.005666 0.003204
5F 58 0.004803 0.003353 0.00545 0.003159
6F 68 0.004396 0.003014 0.005089 0.003035
7F 78 0.003932 0.002652 0.004631 0.002856
8F 88 0.003432 0.002274 0.004116 0.002639
9F 98 0.002915 0.002043 0.00372 0.0024
10F 108 0.002605
0.001863
0.003552 0.00216
11F 118 0.002522
0.001685
0.003428 0.002049
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+11 : 12 storied
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.003 0.0035 0.004 0.0045
Height
(ft) Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+11 : 12 storied
Drift ratio for Model 1 in X-direction
Drift ratio for Model 1 in Y-direction

24. RESULTS
• Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-2 (Drift ratio)
Height (ft)
Drift Ratio
Story BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.001612 0.001239 0.001407 0.000755
1F 18 0.003631 0.002612 0.003262 0.001653
2F 28 0.004134 0.002991 0.003935 0.002089
3F 38 0.004022 0.002876 0.004091 0.002224
4F 48 0.003695 0.002619 0.003982 0.002212
5F 58 0.003322 0.002308 0.003709 0.002116
6F 68 0.002917 0.00197 0.003337 0.001966
7F 78 0.002476 0.001614 0.002911 0.001783
8F 88 0.002074 0.001398 0.00272 0.001585
9F 98 0.001955 0.001233 0.002654 0.001387
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+9 : 10 storied
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.003 0.0035
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+9 : 10 storied
Drift ratio for Model 2 in X-direction
Drift ratio for Model 2 in Y-direction

25. RESULTS
• Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-3 (Drift ratio)
Height(ft)
Drift Ratio
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.001189 0.000919 0.00099 0.000537
1F 18 0.002649 0.001913 0.002264 0.001154
2F 28 0.002953 0.002138 0.002657 0.001413
3F 38 0.002777 0.001985 0.002664 0.001449
4F 48 0.002432 0.001717 0.00248 0.001378
5F 58 0.002066 0.001406 0.00219 0.001249
6F 68 0.001683 0.001077 0.001856 0.001092
7F 78 0.001403 0.000874 0.001811 0.000927
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.003 0.0035
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+7 : 8 storied
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+7 : 8 storied
Drift ratio for Model 3 in X-direction
Drift ratio for Model 3 in Y-direction

26. RESULTS
Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-4 (Drift ratio)
Height (ft)
Drift Ratio
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6WX 0.9DL+1.3WX
X dir. Y dir. X dir. Y dir.
Base 0 0 0 0 0
GF 8 0.0008 0.000624 0.000627 0.000358
1F 18 0.001748 0.001269 0.001401 0.000747
2F 28 0.001877 0.001358 0.001569 0.000863
3F 38 0.001653 0.001175 0.00147 0.000821
4F 48 0.001315 0.000909 0.001257 0.000709
5F 58 0.000996 0.000628 0.001006 0.000572
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+5 : 6 storied
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+5 : 6
Drift ratio for Model 4 in X-direction
Drift ratio for Model 4 in Y-direction

27. RESULTS
Graphical comparison of drift ratio for models
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.003 0.0035
Height
(ft)
Drift ratio
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
Drift ratio for Models in X-direction (BNBC 2020)
Drift ratio for Models in Y-direction (BNBC 2020)
Drift ratio for Models in X-direction (BNBC 2006) Drift ratio for Models in Y-direction (BNBC 2006)

28. RESULTS
Numerical and Graphical
Representations
Height
(ft)
Storey shear (kip)
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6
WX
0.9DL+1.3WX
GF 8 493.283 839.878
1F 18 486.231 839.878
2F 28 450.333 776.666
3F 38 413.051 710.483
4F 48 373.528 639.844
5F 58 332.211 564.804
6F 68 289.403 487.343
7F 78 245.306 407.902
`8F 88 200.066 326.48
9F 98 153.797 243.077
10F 108 106.586 157.694
11F 118 58.506 70.771
 Model Type-1 (Storey shear)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Height
(ft) Storey shear (kip)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+11 : 12 storied
Storey shear (kip) for Model 1

29. RESULTS
Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-2 (Storey shear)
Storey shear (kip) for Model 2
Height(
ft)
Storey shear (kip)
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6
WX
0.9DL+1.3WX
GF 8 480.554 636.944
1F 18 480.554 636.944
2F 28 437.101 576.777
3F 38 391.788 513.677
4F 48 343.467 446.177
5F 58 292.737 374.33
6F 68 240.005 300.094
7F 78 185.543 223.901
8F 88 129.547 145.752
9F 98 72.168 65.648
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Height
(ft)
Storey shear (kip)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+9 : 10 storied

30. RESULTS
Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-3 (Storey shear)
Storey shear (kip) for Model 3
Height(
ft)
Storey shear (kip)
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6
WX
0.9DL+1.3WX
GF 8 368.384 457.717
1F 18 368.384 457.717
2F 28 323.976 400.175
3F 38 277.738 339.699
4F 48 228.542 274.823
5F 58 176.976 205.601
6F 68 123.439 133.988
7F 78 68.201 60.419
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 100 200 300 400 500
Height
(ft)
Storey shear (kip)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+7 : 8 storied

31. RESULTS
Numerical and Graphical
Representations
 Model Type-4 (Storey shear)
Storey shear (kip) for Model 4
Height(
ft)
Storey shear (kip)
Story
BNBC 2020 BNBC 2006
1.2DL+LL+1.6
WX
0.9DL+1.3WX
GF 8 245.262 308.538
1F 18 245.262 308.538
2F 28 202.855 251.478
3F 38 158.618 190.104
4F 48 111.423 124.436
5F 58 61.857 55.543
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Height
(ft)
Storey shear (kip)
BNBC 2020
BNBC 2006
G+5 : 6 storied

32. RESULTS
Graphical comparison of storey shear for models
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Height
(ft)
Storey shear (kip)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Height
(ft)
Storey shear (kip)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
Storey shear for Models (BNBC 2020) Storey shear for Models (BNBC 2006)

33. RESULTS
Graphical comparison of storey stiffness for models
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Height
(ft)
Storey stiffness (kip/in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Height
(ft)
Storey stiffness (kip/in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
Storey stiffness for Models in X-direction (BNBC 2020) Storey stiffness for Models in Y-direction (BNBC 2020)

34. RESULTS
Graphical comparison of storey stiffness for models
Storey stiffness for Models in X-direction (BNBC 2006) Storey stiffness for Models in Y-direction (BNBC 2006)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
Height
(ft)
Storey stiffness (kip/in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Height
(ft)
Storey stiffness (kip/in)
Model 1 (G+11)
Model 2 (G+9)
Model 3 (G+7)
Model 4 (G+5)

35. CONCLUSIONS
 For intermediate moment-resisting frame and special moment
resisting frame, base shear of all models according to BNBC
2020 is more than that of BNBC 2006.
In Y-direction, displacement of all models considering BNBC
2020 is more than that of BNBC 2006.
But in X-direction displacement varies.

36. CONCLUSIONS
The drift ratio is maximum at 2nd floor for all models
considering BNBC 2020.
For BNBC 2006 drift ratio is maximum at 4th floor for
Model 1 and at 3rd floor for Model 2 and Model 3.
Storey shear is maximum at ground floor for all models
in both codes.
Storey shear is numerically large for BNBC 2006 than
BNBC 2020.

37. CONCLUSIONS
For model 1 in both X and Y direction storey stiffness
more for BNBC 2006 than BNBC 2020.
For other models the storey stiffness are more for BNBC
2020 than BNBC 2006.
 Comparisons of all parameters are stated above.
According to the comparisons, we can prefer BNBC
2020.

38. 1.A comparative study of cost analysis between BNBC
2006 and BNBC 2020.
2. Similar study can be carried out for steel structure
building.
3.The study of seismic behavior of structural system
could be extended considering different soil
conditions.
RECOMMENDATION FOR FUTURE STUDY

39. For Your Attention