3. Why target the DNA Damage Response?
C-myc has been transcriptionally and non-transcriptionally implicated in having a role in DNA
replication
Increased levels of DNA Damage and replication stress has been reported
Is this a vulnerability that could be exploited within the context of MYCN?
4. Hypothesis
MYCN expression will correlate with increased endogenous levels of replication stress, DNA
damage, DDR and repair activity
MYCN expressing/amplified cells will be more sensitive to an inhibitor of DNA repair (PARPi)
10. Why was DNA Damage associated with
MYCN Expression?
ROS – Variable effects
DNA Fibre Assay
Cdc45
Replication
Characteristic
Result when MYCN
Expressed (OFF vs ON)
Mean Fork Speed
kb/min
0.743 vs 0.5359 CIdU
0.8959 vs 0.668 Idu
Fork Asymmetry
FPR <0.75
20% vs 72%**
New Origins 19% vs 33%*
Stalled/Collapsed forks 7.8% vs 16.8%***
N=7
N=4
13. Rationale for Targeting the DDR
Could MYCN be more sensitive to DDRi?
Replication Stress
DNA Damage
DDR Repair Pathways
PARP-1
High Expression correlates with poor
prognosis
DNA Repair
A Bulwark vs Replication Stress
Shown Efficacy in different Cancers
16. Why are MYCN Expressing more
sensitive to PARPi?
17. Conclusions
MYCN Expression Correlates with – Increased DNA Damage & DNA repair
Olaparib treatment increases DNA damage and more fork stalling/collapse when MYCN
expressed
Survival and viability assays confirm MYCN expressing are more sensitive to PARPi
PARP is a potentially viable drug target in high risk neuroblastoma and warrants further research